True. Oral evidence of the modification of a contract after its making can be introduced at a trial, subject to certain requirements.
Generally, modifications to a written contract must be in writing to be enforceable. However, there are exceptions to this rule, such as where the parties to the contract have a history of modifying their agreement orally or where the contract itself explicitly allows for oral modifications. In such cases, oral evidence may be admissible in court to prove the modification of the contract.
It should be noted, however, that the admissibility of oral evidence to modify a contract can be subject to various legal and evidentiary rules, and may be disputed by the other party to the contract.
To know more about written contract, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/13510392
#SPJ11
T/F; if there is a statute that prohibits a certain act, a contract to do it is unenforceable.
True.
If there is a statute that prohibits a certain act, a contract to do it is unenforceable. This is because the contract is against public policy and illegal. The law will not enforce a contract that is illegal or against public policy. For example, a contract to commit a crime is unenforceable because it is illegal. Similarly, a contract to sell alcohol to a minor is unenforceable because it is against public policy. Therefore, any contract that is against the law or public policy is unenforceable.
Learn more about public policy is unenforceable.
https://brainly.com/question/28043524
#SPJ11
.The drugs that are often the choice for the young due to low cost and easy availability are ...
A. stimulants
B. inhalants
C. designer drugs
D. narcotics
B. Inhalants are often the choice for the young due to low cost and easy availability.
They are typically found in common household products such as cleaning fluids, gasoline, and aerosol sprays, and can produce a quick high when inhaled. Inhalant use can be very dangerous and can cause serious health problems or even death. Stimulants, designer drugs, and narcotics are also commonly abused by young people, but they are generally more expensive and less easily available than inhalants.Stimulants, inhalants, designer drugs, and narcotics are all types of drugs that can be used by young people for various reasons. However, each type of drug has its own specific characteristics that make it more or less likely to be chosen by young people.
Stimulants are drugs that increase alertness, attention, and energy, and can include substances like cocaine, amphetamines, and caffeine. Young people may be drawn to stimulants because they are often used as study aids, party drugs, or to help with weight loss.
Learn more about Inhalants here:https://brainly.com/question/30541866
#SPJ11
the use of hearings to insure that bureaucrats do what the congress intended is an example of
The use of hearings to ensure that bureaucrats do what Congress intended is an example of oversight. Oversight refers to the process of monitoring, supervising, and controlling the actions of government officials or agencies.
Hearings are an important tool in the oversight process because they provide a platform for Congress to question and scrutinize the activities of bureaucrats. During these hearings, Congress can call on bureaucrats to testify and answer questions about their policies, decisions, and actions. This helps to ensure that bureaucrats are accountable and that they are fulfilling their duties in accordance with the laws and regulations set by Congress. Furthermore, hearings provide a forum for public scrutiny and can increase transparency and accountability in government. Ultimately, the use of hearings in the oversight process helps to ensure that bureaucrats are serving the best interests of the public and are not acting in a way that is contrary to the intentions of Congress.
Learn more about bureaucrats here :
https://brainly.com/question/28661392
#SPJ11
it is legally necessary to notify the obligor of any assignment of rights to a third party. true/false
The answer to whether it is legally necessary to notify the obligor of any assignment of rights to a third party is generally "it depends." In some cases, there may be specific laws or regulations that require notice to be given to the obligor.
However, in other situations, there may be no legal requirement to give notice to the obligor. This may be the case if the assignment of rights is part of a private contract between the parties, and there are no laws or regulations that require notice to be given. It is worth noting, however, that even if there is no legal requirement to give notice of an assignment, it may still be a good business practice to do so.
It is legally necessary to notify the obligor of any assignment of rights to a third party. This ensures that the obligor is aware of their obligations towards the new assignee and helps prevent any confusion or disputes in the future.
To know more about obligor visit:
https://brainly.com/question/29213895
#SPJ11
as a general guideline, what percent of each paycheck should be set aside for retirement?
As a general guideline, it is recommended that individuals set aside at least 10-15% of their paycheck for retirement savings.
This percentage can vary depending on factors such as age, income level, and retirement goals. Younger individuals may want to aim for a higher percentage of their paycheck to be saved for retirement, as they have more time to allow their savings to grow through compound interest. It is important to consult with a financial advisor to determine the appropriate percentage for your individual situation and to regularly review and adjust your savings plan as needed.
As a general guideline, financial experts recommend setting aside at least 10-15% of each paycheck for retirement. This percentage allows for a comfortable savings accumulation over time, providing a solid foundation for future financial security. However, individual circumstances vary, and factors such as age, current savings, and retirement goals should be considered when determining the ideal amount to save. Regularly contributing to retirement accounts such as 401(k) plans, IRAs, or pensions can help maximize potential growth through compound interest and tax advantages. Remember to periodically reassess and adjust your savings strategy to stay on track for a successful retirement.
Visit here to learn more about financial experts : https://brainly.com/question/14376452
#SPJ11
Which of the following is not a possible outcome of a request for relief of liability? a. Liability remains unchanged b. Liability is reduced c. Liability is eliminated d. Liability is increased
The answer to the question is d. Liability is increased. A request for relief of liability is typically made when an individual or organization is seeking protection from legal responsibility for a particular action or event.
When a request for relief is granted, the liability may be reduced or eliminated, meaning that the individual or organization is no longer responsible for the consequences of the action or event. However, it is not possible for the liability to be increased as a result of the request for relief. In fact, if the request is denied, the liability may remain unchanged, but it cannot be increased as a direct result of the request. It is important to note that a request for relief of liability does not guarantee protection from legal action, and each situation must be evaluated on a case-by-case basis. Ultimately, the outcome of a request for relief of liability will depend on the specific circumstances of the situation and the decision of the legal system.
learn more about liability here:
https://brainly.com/question/18484315
#SPJ11
Tax laws, building codes, and health codes are examples of what type of law?
Tax laws, building codes, and health codes are all examples of regulatory law. Regulatory law is a type of law that regulates or governs certain activities or industries.
These laws are created and enforced by government agencies to protect public health and safety, ensure fair competition in business, and regulate economic activities. Tax laws are regulations that govern the collection and administration of taxes by government authorities. They set out the rules and procedures for determining taxable income, calculating tax liabilities, and enforcing tax laws. Building codes are regulations that govern the construction, alteration, and maintenance of buildings and structures. They are designed to ensure that buildings are safe, structurally sound, and accessible for people with disabilities. Health codes are regulations that govern the standards of hygiene and sanitation in public places, food service establishments, and healthcare facilities. They are designed to protect public health and prevent the spread of disease. Overall, regulatory law plays an important role in ensuring public safety, protecting the environment, and promoting fair competition in business. These laws are enforced by government agencies and can carry significant penalties for non-compliance.
Learn more about Regulatory here
https://brainly.com/question/29618671
#SPJ11
conflict resolution strategies that use a more positive approach require _____.
Conflict resolution strategies that use a more positive approach require effective communication, active listening, empathy, and collaboration.
To begin with, effective communication is essential in addressing conflicts positively. This involves clearly expressing one's thoughts and feelings, as well as understanding the other person's perspective. Maintaining a calm and respectful tone helps in preventing the situation from escalating further.
Secondly, active listening plays a crucial role in conflict resolution. This entails paying attention to what the other person is saying, avoiding interruptions, and asking clarifying questions. Demonstrating that you are genuinely trying to understand their viewpoint can make them feel valued and contribute to resolving the issue.
Empathy is another key component of positive conflict resolution strategies. By putting yourself in the other person's shoes and acknowledging their feelings, you can develop a deeper understanding of their perspective. This promotes mutual respect and can pave the way for finding a solution that satisfies both parties.
Finally, collaboration is essential in developing a win-win solution. This means working together to identify common goals and devising a plan that addresses the concerns of all parties involved. By emphasizing cooperation instead of competition, you can foster an atmosphere of trust and encourage open dialogue.
In summary, conflict resolution strategies that use a more positive approach require effective communication, active listening, empathy, and collaboration. These techniques promote understanding, respect, and cooperation, ultimately leading to a more satisfying resolution for all parties involved.
To know more about Conflict resolution refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/24769299#
#SPJ11
in the case of in re winship, the supreme court held that delinquency must be established
In the landmark case of In re Winship, the U.S. Supreme Court established an important precedent regarding the burden of proof in juvenile delinquency cases.
Specifically, the Court held that the prosecution must prove delinquency "beyond a reasonable doubt" in order to secure a conviction. This decision was significant because it established the same high standard of proof that is required in adult criminal cases, and it underscored the importance of protecting the rights of juveniles who are accused of wrongdoing. The Winship case centered on a 12-year-old boy who was accused of stealing money from a locker at his school. At trial, the prosecution presented evidence that the boy had been seen near the locker at the time of the theft and that he had spent more money than usual on candy and toys. However, the defense argued that this evidence was circumstantial and that the prosecution had not met the high burden of proof required to secure a conviction. Ultimately, the Supreme Court agreed with the defense and overturned the boy's conviction, establishing the precedent that has been followed in juvenile delinquency cases ever since.
Overall, the Winship case was an important victory for the rights of juveniles in the U.S. legal system. By establishing a high standard of proof and emphasizing the importance of due process, the Court helped to ensure that young people are not unfairly punished or deprived of their freedom without sufficient evidence.
Learn more about criminal cases here :
https://brainly.com/question/30278728
#SPJ11
According to Little's Law, which of the following can be used to estimate work-in-process inventory?
a) Process time/Cycle time
b) Throughput rate times Flow time
c) Process velocity/Flow time
d) Set up time/Throughput rate
e) Value added time/Process velocity
According to Little's Law, Throughput rate times Flow time can be used to estimate work-in-process inventory
Little's Law states that work-in-process inventory (WIP) is equal to the throughput rate (R) multiplied by the flow time (T) in a stable system. Mathematically, WIP = R x T.
Throughput rate refers to the rate at which the system is producing finished products, while flow time refers to the time it takes for one unit to move through the system from start to finish. By multiplying the throughput rate by the flow time, we can estimate the average amount of work-in-process inventory in the system at any given time.
Know more about Little's Law here:
https://brainly.com/question/29538196
#SPJ11
the supreme court, during the reagan administration and the period of "new federalism", began to
During the Reagan administration and the period of "new federalism," the Supreme Court began to shift towards a more conservative interpretation of federalism.
This meant that the Court was more likely to limit the power of the federal government and give more authority to the states. Some notable cases during this time include United States v. Lopez (1995), which struck down a federal gun control law as exceeding Congress's Commerce Clause power, and Printz v. United States (1997), which ruled that the federal government could not compel state and local law enforcement officers to conduct background checks on gun purchasers. Overall, the Court's decisions during this time reflected a belief in limiting the power of the federal government and promoting state sovereignty.
To know more about new federalism, visit:
brainly.com/question/13038531
#SPJ11
In 2010, _________ settled the largest sex-discrimination lawsuit in history.
a. Sears
b. Target
c. Costco
d. Wal-Mart
In 2010, the correct answer is d. Wal-Mart. Wal-Mart settled the largest sex-discrimination lawsuit in history known as Dukes v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
The lawsuit was filed by female employees alleging gender-based discrimination in pay and promotions. The case represented a class-action lawsuit covering approximately 1.6 million current and former female employees of Wal-Mart. The settlement resulted in Wal-Mart agreeing to pay $187 million and implement changes to their employment practices to address the allegations of discrimination.
It's important to note that while the Dukes case settled, it did not conclusively establish Wal-Mart's liability for sex discrimination. The settlement allowed both parties to avoid further litigation and marked an important moment in the ongoing efforts to address workplace discrimination and promote gender equality represented by class-action lawsuit.
To learn more about class-action lawsuit, visit here
https://brainly.com/question/31229402
#SPJ4
the group that urges states to enact model laws to provide greater uniformity of law is called the
The group that urges states to enact model laws to provide greater uniformity of law is called the Uniform Law Commission (ULC).
The ULC is a non-profit organization that was established in 1892 with the aim of improving the laws of the United States by promoting uniformity and clarity in the law. The ULC works with legal experts, legislators, and other stakeholders to develop and propose model laws that can be enacted by states to address emerging legal issues or provide consistency in the law across different jurisdictions.
The ULC has drafted and recommended numerous model laws on various legal topics, including business and commercial law, family law, and criminal law. Some of the most well-known model laws developed by the ULC include the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC), the Uniform Probate Code (UPC), and the Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act (UCCJEA).
The ULC's efforts have been instrumental in promoting legal uniformity and consistency across different states, thereby reducing confusion and ensuring that legal issues are addressed in a consistent and predictable manner. By advocating for the enactment of model laws, the ULC helps to ensure that the law remains relevant and effective in an ever-changing legal landscape.
To know more about laws, refer to the link below:
https://brainly.com/question/31459556#
#SPJ11
Retirement plans (IRAs, SEPs, and SIMPLEs) with named beneficiary designations pass outside of the probate process. Transfers that include a revocable beneficiary designation or a transfer to a revocable trust are incomplete transfers, which are not gifts for gift tax purposes. True or False?
Retirement plans with named beneficiary designations, such as IRAs, SEPs, and SIMPLEs, do pass outside of the probate process.
The statement is true.
For gift tax purposes, transfers with a revocable beneficiary designation or to a revocable trust are considered incomplete transfers. Retirement plans such as IRAs, SEPs, and SIMPLEs allow individuals to save for retirement and offer the benefit of named beneficiary designations. Upon the account holder's death, the assets held in the account are directly transferred to the named beneficiaries without going through the probate process. This can be advantageous, as it saves time and money, and provides quicker access to the assets. However, it's important to periodically review and update beneficiary designations to ensure that they reflect the account holder's wishes and any changes in personal circumstances or family situations.
Know more about retirement plans:
https://brainly.com/question/29393946
#SPJ11
The Supreme Court approved the right to terminate a pregnancy by a narrow 5-4 majority. True or false
In the landmark case of Roe v. Wade in 1973, the United States Supreme Court established a constitutional right to abortion.
The Court held that a woman's right to privacy, which is protected under the Due Process Clause of the 14th Amendment, includes the right to choose to have an abortion.
The decision was not unanimous, however. The Court voted 7-2 in favor of the right to abortion, but the majority opinion was written by Justice Harry Blackmun and joined by only four other justices. The dissenting opinion was written by Justice William Rehnquist, who was joined by Justice Byron White.
Since then, the issue of abortion has remained contentious and politically charged in the United States. Proponents of abortion rights argue that women should have the right to make decisions about their own bodies, while opponents argue that abortion is immoral and violates the rights of the fetus.
Learn more about violates here:
https://brainly.com/question/14365243
#SPJ11
the fair packaging and labeling act in the united states enforces laws for what reason?
The Fair Packaging and Labeling Act (FPLA) in the United States enforces laws for the purpose of protecting consumers from misleading or false labeling and packaging.
The act requires that all consumer products must carry clear and accurate information about the contents and ingredients of the product. This is important as it ensures that consumers can make informed decisions when purchasing products and also helps to prevent fraud in the marketplace. The FPLA also mandates that the label must include the manufacturer's name, address, and the net quantity of the contents. This is to prevent manufacturers from deceiving consumers with inaccurate information about the product, such as overestimating the amount of product contained in the packaging. Moreover, the FPLA covers a wide range of products including food, drugs, cosmetics, and household products. The act also ensures that all product labeling and packaging must be in English so that consumers can understand what they are purchasing. Overall, the Fair Packaging and Labeling Act serves to protect consumers from fraudulent and deceptive packaging and labeling practices, ensuring that they have access to accurate information about the products they purchase.
Learn more about United States here
https://brainly.com/question/25899399
#SPJ11
claims of self-defense are weakened whenever ________.
Claims of self-defense are weakened whenever there is evidence of excessive force or disproportionate response, lack of imminence, or absence of necessity.
Excessive force or disproportionate response means that the defender used more force than was necessary to defend themselves from the perceived threat. For example, if someone uses deadly force against an unarmed attacker, or if they continue to use force after the threat has been neutralized, their claim of self-defense may be weakened or even invalidated.
Lack of imminence means that the threat was not immediate or that the attacker did not pose an immediate danger to the defender. For example, if someone uses force against an attacker who is walking away, their claim of self-defense may be weakened or invalidated.
Absence of necessity means that the defender did not have a reasonable belief that using force was necessary to defend themselves. For example, if someone uses force against an attacker who is not physically threatening them, their claim of self-defense may be weakened or invalidated.
It is also important to note that self-defense claims can be weakened or invalidated if the defender is found to have initiated the altercation or if they were engaged in criminal activity at the time of the incident. In addition, self-defense claims may be subject to legal scrutiny and may be evaluated based on the specific circumstances of the incident.
Know more about self-defense here:
https://brainly.com/question/30673507
#SPJ11
When the judge ruled that the seller pay the buyer for damages this is an example of what?
1) Specific Performance
2) Liquidated Damages
3) Rescission
4) Compensatory Damages
The judge ruling that the seller pay the buyer for damages is an example of compensatory damages. Hence, option 4. compensatory damages is correct.
Compensatory damages are a monetary award given to the buyer to compensate them for the actual losses they suffered due to the seller's breach of contract. In this case, the buyer suffered damages due to the seller's breach of the contract, and the judge ordered the seller to pay the buyer to compensate them for those losses. Specific performance, on the other hand, is a remedy where the court orders the seller to perform their obligations under the contract as agreed upon. Liquidated damages are a predetermined amount of damages agreed upon in the contract to be paid in case of a breach. Rescission is the cancellation of the contract, and both parties are released from their obligations. In conclusion, the judge ruling that the seller pay the buyer for damages is an example of compensatory damages, which aim to compensate the buyer for the actual losses they suffered due to the seller's breach of the contract.
learn more about compensatory damages here:
https://brainly.com/question/14265086
#SPJ11
true or false,If the offeree can accept simply by promising to perform, then the contact is unilateral.
The statement, "If the offeree can accept simply by promising to perform, then the contact is unilateral", is True.
If the offeror promises to perform in exchange for the offeree's promise to perform, and the offeree can accept by simply promising to perform, then the contract is unilateral. This means that only the offeror promises to do something, and the offeree is only required to perform if they choose to accept the offer.
An example of a unilateral contract would be a reward for finding a lost item. The offeror promises to pay a reward to anyone who finds the item and returns it, and the offeree can accept by finding and returning the item. In this case, the offeror has made a promise and is obligated to pay the reward if the offeree performs, but the offeree is not obligated to perform unless they choose to accept the offer.
Overall, the key characteristic of a unilateral contract is that only one party is making a promise, and the other party can accept it by performing the requested action.
To learn more about unilateral contract, visit: https://brainly.com/question/15648341
#SPJ11
T/F Criminal justice explains the etiology, extent, and nature of crime in society.
Yes, the above statement is true. Criminal justice explains the etiology, extent, and nature of crime in society.
Criminal justice is a field that aims to understand and address crime in society, including its causes, extent, and nature. The study of criminal justice involves a range of disciplines, including criminology, sociology, psychology, law, and public policy. These disciplines work together to explore the complex factors that contribute to criminal behavior and to develop strategies for preventing and addressing crime. The criminal justice system also plays a critical role in responding to and deterring crime, including through law enforcement, the courts, and corrections. Overall, criminal justice is a multifaceted field that seeks to promote safety and justice in society.
To learn more about Criminal justice, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/30629034
#SPJ11
(T/F) the foran act made it illegal for federal or state government workers to join labor unions.
False, the Foran Act did not make it illegal for federal or state government workers to join labor unions.
The Foran Act, also known as the Contract Labor Law of 1885, was a United States federal law that aimed to prohibit the importation and migration of foreign workers who had entered into contracts for work within the United States. The purpose of the law was to protect American workers from unfair competition with cheaper foreign labor and to prevent the exploitation of foreign workers.
The legislation that did restrict the rights of government employees to join labor unions is the Hatch Act of 1939. This act limited the political activities of federal employees to ensure that they perform their duties without the influence of partisan politics. Although the Hatch Act did not outright ban government workers from joining unions, it did place restrictions on their involvement in political activities, which could limit their participation in union-related activities.
In summary, the Foran Act of 1885 focused on regulating the importation of foreign labor, while the Hatch Act of 1939 addressed the political activities of federal employees. Neither act made it explicitly illegal for federal or state government workers to join labor unions, but the Hatch Act did impose limitations on their involvement in certain union-related activities.
Learn more about government :
https://brainly.com/question/16940043
#SPJ11
Question 4 of 10
Government spending influences the economy by:
A. influencing the brands of products the country is allowed to
produce.
B. setting the salaries for employees in all private industries.
C. deciding on the prices for goods available to consumers.
D. determining which government programs get the most funding.
Government spending influences the economy by: determining which government programs get the most funding. Option D
What are the influence of government spending?Government spending can influence the economy by directing resources towards certain sectors or programs, creating jobs, and stimulating economic activity.
The government can choose to allocate funds to different areas, such as education, healthcare, defense, infrastructure, and social welfare programs, which can have a significant impact on the economy.
By determining which government programs get the most funding, the government can affect the level of economic growth, employment, and consumer spending in the country.
Learn more about government spending at https://brainly.com/question/29794698
#SPJ1
the identity of a person submitting a complaint against a nurse to the bon is kept confidential
The confidentiality of a person submitting a complaint against a nurse to the Board of Nursing (BON) is crucial for several reasons. Maintaining confidentiality provides a safe and protected environment for individuals to come forward with their concerns and ensures their willingness to report any misconduct or malpractice without fear of retaliation or negative consequences.
By keeping the identity of the complainant confidential, it helps protect them from potential harm, harassment, or discrimination that could arise if their identity were disclosed.
It allows individuals to freely express their concerns and share relevant information without fear of personal or professional repercussions. This is particularly important when the complaint involves sensitive matters or potential misconduct by the nurse.
Confidentiality also encourages more individuals to come forward with their experiences and observations, which can contribute to a more comprehensive understanding of the nurse's conduct or performance. It promotes a culture of accountability and safety within the healthcare system by providing an avenue for reporting and addressing concerns.
Furthermore, maintaining confidentiality during the complaint process demonstrates the BON's commitment to impartiality and fairness. It ensures that the investigation is conducted objectively and without any biases or influence based on the identity of the complainant. It helps protect the integrity of the process and the credibility of the outcomes.
Overall, confidentiality in the complaint process is essential to protect the rights and safety of individuals coming forward with concerns about a nurse's practice. It creates an environment conducive to reporting, investigation, and resolution while upholding the principles of fairness and justice.
To know more about Board of Nursing (BON) refer here
https://brainly.com/question/30473783#
#SPJ11
Bernard Madoff, Bear Stearn, and Lehman Brothers all have committed this type of crime
a. Globalization
b. Transnational
c. Green
d. Corporate Enterprise
The responsibility falls on corporations to prioritize ethical business practices and act with integrity towards their stakeholders.
The type of crime committed by Bernard Madoff, Bear Stearns, and Lehman Brothers is corporate enterprise fraud. This type of fraud involves businesses or corporations using illegal means to deceive their investors, customers, and other stakeholders for financial gain. In the case of Bernard Madoff, he ran a massive Ponzi scheme where he used new investors' money to pay off existing investors. Bear Stearns and Lehman Brothers were involved in fraudulent mortgage securities that contributed to the 2008 financial crisis. This type of crime has transnational implications because corporations often operate in multiple countries and their fraudulent activities can have far-reaching effects. Additionally, globalization has increased the interconnectedness of economies, making it easier for corporations to commit fraud across borders. However, the issue at hand is primarily a matter of corporate accountability and ethical behavior. To prevent corporate enterprise fraud, governments need to enforce strict regulations and hold businesses accountable for their actions. It is also essential for investors and stakeholders to conduct due diligence and exercise caution when dealing with corporations. Ultimately, the responsibility falls on corporations to prioritize ethical business practices and act with integrity towards their stakeholders.
Learn more about stakeholders here
https://brainly.com/question/30720205
#SPJ11
the process by which government can acquire ownership of private land for public use is
The process by which the government can acquire ownership of private land for public use is known as "eminent domain or land expropriation."
Eminent domain is a power granted to the government to take private property for public use as long as the owner is compensated for the value of the property. This power is typically used to acquire land for infrastructure projects such as roads, highways, and airports or for public facilities such as schools and hospitals.
The process of eminent domain involves a series of steps that include the identification of the land needed for public use, the appraisal of the value of the property, and negotiations with the landowner to agree on a price for the land. If the landowner refuses to sell, the government can initiate a legal proceeding to take ownership of the land.
While eminent domain can be controversial, it is a necessary power for the government to have in order to ensure that public projects are completed for the greater good of society. However, it is important that the government uses this power judiciously and fairly to protect the rights of private property owners.
To learn more about the Eminent domain, visit: https://brainly.com/question/30947843
#SPJ11
In Texas, special elections are held for all of the following reasons EXCEPT to:
a. give approval to borrow money.
b. ratify amendments to the Texas Constitution.
c. fill vacancies in office.
d. allow government agencies to undertake long-term debt.
e. impeach a corrupt politician.
In Texas, special elections are held for all of the following reasons except: e. impeach a corrupt politician.
In Texas, special elections are held for various reasons, including giving approval to borrow money, ratifying amendments to the Texas Constitution, filling vacancies in office, and allowing government agencies to undertake long-term debt.
Special elections in Texas are used to give approval to borrow money, ratify amendments to the Texas Constitution, fill vacancies in office, and allow government agencies to incur long-term debt. Impeachment of a corrupt politician is not a purpose for holding special elections; rather, it is a process handled by the legislature.
However, special elections are not specifically held to impeach a corrupt politician. Impeachment is a separate legal and political process that involves charges of misconduct or wrongdoing against a public official. While impeachment can lead to the removal of an individual from office, it is not a specific reason for holding a special election.
To know more about Texas special elections, visit:
brainly.com/question/28039654
#SPJ11
which of the following refers to gifts made in contemplation of one’s immediate death?
a. intervivos gifts
b. intravivos gifts
c. gift causa mortis
d. gift mortis cause
The answer is c. gift causa mortis. This term refers to gifts made in contemplation of one's immediate death.
It is a type of gift that is conditional and revocable, meaning that it is only effective if the donor dies as a result of the contemplated peril. If the donor survives, the gift is revoked and the property returns to the donor. Intervivos gifts, on the other hand, are gifts made during the donor's lifetime and are not conditional upon their death. Intravivos gifts are also gifts made during the donor's lifetime but are typically used in the context of property transfers, such as real estate. Understanding the different types of gifts is important for estate planning and ensuring that your wishes are carried out after your death. Gift causa mortis is one way to make sure that your property is distributed according to your wishes and can provide peace of mind in the face of an immediate danger.
Learn more about mortis here: https://brainly.com/question/30765407
#SPJ11
which of the following is not a right granted to crime victims in at least some jurisdictions? - the right to be informed, present, and heard at important criminal justice proceedings
- the right of sexual assault victims to be paid for forensic exams
- the right to HIV testing of sex offenders and notification of the results
The right of sexual assault victims to be paid for forensic exams is not a right granted to crime victims in at least some jurisdictions.
Crime victims' rights are legal rights granted to victims of crimes in many jurisdictions around the world. These rights are designed to ensure that victims are treated with dignity and respect, and that they have a voice in the criminal justice system. Some common rights granted to crime victims in at least some jurisdictions include the right to be informed, present, and heard at important criminal justice proceedings, the right to receive compensation for their losses, and the right to protection from the accused. While some jurisdictions do provide financial assistance to sexual assault victims for forensic exams, this is not considered a right granted to crime victims in all jurisdictions. Similarly, while some jurisdictions do require HIV testing of sex offenders and notification of the results, this is not universally recognized as a right of crime victims. Therefore, the right of sexual assault victims to be paid for forensic exams is not a right granted to crime victims in at least some jurisdictions.
To learn more about sexual assault victims, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/10386606
#SPJ11
In early England, the sheriff was responsible for which of the following tasks?
A)He maintained law and order in the tithings.
B)He presided over court proceedings of civil disputes.
C)He collected taxes and served as magistrate.
D)He conducted preliminary hearings to determine cause of death and the party responsible for it.
In early England, the sheriff was responsible for collecting taxes and serving as magistrate. The answer is C)
In early England, the sheriff was a royal official who held a position of significant power and authority. The sheriff was responsible for maintaining law and order in the tithings, which were small areas of land that were used for the purpose of collecting taxes and enforcing local laws.
However, the primary responsibilities of the sheriff were to collect taxes and serve as magistrate. The sheriff collected taxes on behalf of the king and was responsible for ensuring that they were paid in a timely and efficient manner.
In addition, the sheriff served as magistrate and presided over court proceedings of civil disputes. The sheriff also conducted preliminary hearings to determine the cause of death and the party responsible for it, although this was not one of the primary responsibilities of the sheriff.
Thus, the correct option is C)
To know more about magistrate, refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/13523139#
#SPJ11
In 1997, the Supreme Court rendered a decision on a case stipulating that sexual harassment law:
A. Only applies to women B. Only applies to men C. Only applies to the workplace D. Applies to both men and women in any setting
The correct option is D. Applies to both men and women in any setting. In 1997, the Supreme Court rendered a decision on a case stipulating that sexual harassment law applies to both men and women in any setting.
This landmark ruling established that sexual harassment is a form of discrimination that is prohibited by law, regardless of the gender of the victim or the location of the incident. The decision has had significant implications for workplace policies and practices, as well as for the legal rights of victims of sexual harassment.
In 1997, the Supreme Court rendered a decision on a case stipulating that sexual harassment law applies to both men and women in any setting (Option D). This decision ensures equal protection under the law for all individuals, regardless of their gender, in situations involving sexual harassment.
Learn more about legal rights here:- brainly.com/question/28024586
#SPJ11
The correct option is D. Applies to both men and women in any setting. In 1997, the Supreme Court rendered a decision on a case stipulating that sexual harassment law applies to both men and women in any setting.
This landmark ruling established that sexual harassment is a form of discrimination that is prohibited by law, regardless of the gender of the victim or the location of the incident. The decision has had significant implications for workplace policies and practices, as well as for the legal rights of victims of sexual harassment.
In 1997, the Supreme Court rendered a decision on a case stipulating that sexual harassment law applies to both men and women in any setting (Option D). This decision ensures equal protection under the law for all individuals, regardless of their gender, in situations involving sexual harassment.
Learn more about legal rights here:- brainly.com/question/28024586
#SPJ11
