our environment is very sensitive to the amount of ozone in the upper atmosphere. the level of ozone normally found is 4.7 parts/million (ppm). a researcher believes that the current ozone level is not at a normal level. the mean of 21 samples is 5.1 ppm with a standard deviation of 1.1 . assume the population is normally distributed. a level of significance of 0.01 will be used. find the value of the test statistic. round your answer to two decimal places.

Answer: b - r/5 + 7

explanation:

Isolate the variable by dividing each side by factors that don't contain the variable.

Answer:

b = r/5 + 7

Step-by-step explanation:

Distribute first: 5b - 35 = r

Add 35 to both sides: 5b = r + 35

Divide by 5: b = r/5 + 7

The speaker is John F. Kennedy. It was during the Address on the Nation's Space Program.

The purpose behind this speech was to gain America's support and to get everyone on board with the idea of space exploration. The audience were Americans.

The rhetorical appeal used include logos, and ethos.

The rhetorical appeal illustrated was used when he said " I appreciate your president having made me an honorary visiting professor, and I will assure you that my first lecture will be very brief"

We have,

The formal term for describing various persuasive techniques is a rhetorical appeal. Ethos, pathos, and logos are all terms used in rhetorical appeals. Language used to inspire, inform, or persuade readers, listeners, or both is known as rhetoric. Figurative language and other literary devices are frequently used in rhetoric; when they are, they are referred to as rhetorical devices.

The decision to go to the Moon and the space program were influenced, in part, by Cold War tensions between the United States and the Soviet Union, as suggested by President Kennedy's speech at Rice University.

Learn more about Kennedy on:

brainly.com/question/1577421

#SPJ1

complete question:

Despite the striking fact that most of the scientists that the world has ever known are alive and working today, despite the fact that this Nation's own scientific manpower is doubling every 12 years in a rate of growth more than three times that of our population as a whole, despite that, the vast stretches of the unknown and the unanswered and the unfinished still far outstrip our collective comprehension.

The sample size of only 5, it's difficult to make strong conclusions about the differences in pricing between the two stores.

To compare the textbook prices for two online bookstores, we can calculate the mean and standard deviation of the textbook prices for each store.

For store A:

Mean = (115 + 43 + 99 + 80 + 119) / 5 = $91.20

Standard deviation = 34.48

For store B:

Mean = (110 + 40 + 99 + 69 + 109) / 5 = $85.40

Standard deviation = 29.80

From this, we can see that the mean textbook price for store A is higher than that of store B, but store A also has a higher standard deviation, indicating greater variability in prices.

However,

With a sample size of only 5, it's difficult to make strong conclusions about the differences in pricing between the two stores.

For similar question on sample size:

https://brainly.com/question/30885988

#SPJ11

A non-negative linear combination of submodular functions is also a submodular function.

Let f1, f2, ..., fm be submodular functions, and let c1, c2, ..., cm be non-negative constants. We want to show that the function f defined by f(x) = c1f1(x) + c2f2(x) + ... + cmfm(x) is submodular.

To prove this, we need to show that for any sets A and B, and any element x, we have:

f(A ∪ {x}) - f(A) ≥ f(B ∪ {x}) - f(B)

Expanding the left-hand side using the definition of f, we get:

(c1f1(A ∪ {x}) + c2f2(A ∪ {x}) + ... + cmfm(A ∪ {x})) - (c1f1(A) + c2f2(A) + ... + cmfm(A))

Simplifying, we get:

c1(f1(A ∪ {x}) - f1(A)) + c2(f2(A ∪ {x}) - f2(A)) + ... + cm(fm(A ∪ {x}) - fm(A))

Similarly, expanding the right-hand side, we get:

c1(f1(B ∪ {x}) - f1(B)) + c2(f2(B ∪ {x}) - f2(B)) + ... + cm(fm(B ∪ {x}) - fm(B))

To prove that f is submodular, we need to show that the above inequality holds for all A, B, and x. Since each fi is submodular, we have:

fi(A ∪ {x}) - fi(A) ≥ fi(B ∪ {x}) - fi(B)

Multiplying both sides of this inequality by ci and summing over i, we get:

(c1fi(A ∪ {x}) + c2fi(A ∪ {x}) + ... + cmfi(A ∪ {x})) - (c1fi(A) + c2fi(A) + ... + cmfi(A)) ≥ (c1fi(B ∪ {x}) + c2fi(B ∪ {x}) + ... + cmfi(B ∪ {x})) - (c1fi(B) + c2fi(B) + ... + cmfi(B))

Simplifying, we get:

f(A ∪ {x}) - f(A) ≥ f(B ∪ {x}) - f(B)

which is exactly what we needed to show. Therefore, the non-negative linear combination of submodular functions is also a submodular function.

Learn more about functions :

https://brainly.com/question/25638609

#SPJ4

Step-by-step explanation:

The type of transformation shown in the given image is a horizontal translation. This is because the second image, polygon A' B' C' D', is shifted to the right of the first image with all points maintaining the same position. In other words, each point in the second image is horizontally translated by a fixed distance from its corresponding point in the first image.

The other options can be ruled out as follows:

- Vertical translation: This would involve shifting the second image either up or down relative to the first image, which is not the case here.

- Reflection across the x-axis: This would involve flipping the second image upside down relative to the first image, which is not the case here.

- 90° clockwise rotation: This would involve rotating the second image by 90 degrees clockwise relative to the first image, which is not the case here.

Therefore, based on the given information, we can conclude that the type of transformation shown in the given image is a horizontal translation.

Answer:

The type of transformation shown is a Horizontal translation.

Step-by-step explanation:

I did the test and got it right

Answer:

V = (1/3)π(8^2)(16) = 1,024π/3 cubic meters

= 1,072.33 cubic meters

Since 3.14 is used for π here:

V = (1/3)(3.14)(8^2)(16) =

1,071.79 cubic meters

Answer:

Method I

2x +4y=0 -- Equation 1

y =-8x -- Equation 2

Multiply the first equation by -4 to get the "x" coefficient of "2" equal to -8.

-4 * (2x + 4y) = 0

-8x - 16y = 0

Now substitute in "y" for the "-8x" in the second equation to get:

y - 15y = 0

Combine like terms and solve for 'y':

-14y = 0

y = 0

Now, plug your value for 'y' back into either of the two equations above and solve for 'x':

y = -8x

0 = -8x

x = 0

Method II

2x +4y=0 -- Equation 1

y =-8x -- Equation 2

Another way of doing this is simply plugging in '-8x' for 'y' from the second equation into the first equation as follows:

2x + 4 * (-8x) = 0

2x + (-32x) = 0

-30x = 0

x = 0

Take your value for 'x' and plug it into either of the two equations to solve for 'y':

y = -8x

y = -8 * (0)

y=0

Step-by-step explanation:

do i get brainliest???

Answer: x = 16, y = -8

Step-by-step explanation:

Given

2x + 4y = 0

y= -8

substitute -8 for y

2x + (4) (-8) =0

simplify

2x - 32 = 0

add 32 to both sides to isolate variable

2x - 32 +32 = 0 + 32

simplify

2x = 32

divide both sides by 2 to solve for x

2/2x = 32/2

simplify

x = 16

check your work, substitute values of x and y into equation

2(16) + 4( -8) = 0

32 - 32 = 0

equation is true so the answer is correct

A. X and Y might be independent. Knowing the value of one independent variable tells us nothing about the value of the other independent variable. The mean and variance of X and Y being different does not necessarily mean that knowing the value of one tells us nothing about the other.

Visit here to learn more about independent variable brainly.com/question/17034410

#SPJ11

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

If

27

%

is equivalent to

81

magazine subscriptions, then we can find what

100

%

is equivalent to by first finding out what

1

%

is equal to

27

%

=

81

1

%

=

x

x

=

81

27

=

3

Therefore,

1

%

is equivalent to

3

magazine equivalent. If you want to find what

100

%

is equivalent to, you do

3

×

100

which equals to

300

The miles will be around 303 miles, both Uhaul and Penske will have the same total cost.

To determine at what point both companies have the same total cost, we need to set up an equation.

Let x be the number of miles driven.
For Uhaul, the cost will be $50 + $0.99x.
For Penske, the cost will be $350.
Setting these two expressions equal to each other, we get:
$50 + $0.99x = $350
Simplifying this equation, we get:
$0.99x = $300
U-Haul: Cost_UH = 50 + 0.99 * miles

Penske: Cost_P = 350

Set the equations equal to each other to find the number of miles where the costs are equal.

50 + 0.99 * miles = 350

Solve for the number of miles.

0.99 * miles = 350 - 50 0.99 * miles = 300 miles = 300 / 0.99

Calculate the number of miles and round to the nearest whole number if needed.

miles ≈ 303

So,

At approximately 303 miles, both companies will have the same total cost for renting a truck for one day.
Dividing both sides by $0.99, we get:
x ≈ 303.03

It is important to note that this calculation assumes that the only cost for Uhaul is the rental fee and mileage charge, and does not include any additional fees or charges that may be incurred during the rental period.

It is also important to consider other factors such as the availability of trucks, customer service, and any additional services offered by the rental companies before making a final decision.

For more questions related to total cost:

https://brainly.com/question/30355738

#SPJ11

Any vector v in R2 can be expressed as a linear combination of x1 and x2, so x1 and x2 span R2. If x1, x2, and x3 were linearly independent, then the matrix with x1, x2, and x3 as its rows would have a non-zero determinant, which would contradict this fact.

(a) To show that x1 and x2 form a basis for R2, we need to show that they are linearly independent and span R2.
First, we show that they are linearly independent. Suppose we have scalars a and b such that ax1 + bx2 = 0. This gives us the system of equations:
2a + 4b = 0
a + 3b = 0
Solving this system, we get a = -2b. Substituting this into the second equation, we get b = 0, and then a = 0. Thus, the only solution to ax1 + bx2 = 0 is a = b = 0, which shows that x1 and x2 are linearly independent.
Next, we show that they span R2. Any vector in R2 can be written as a linear combination of x1 and x2. Suppose we have a vector v = (x,y) in R2. Then, we can solve for a and b in equation v = ax1 + bx2 to get:
x = 2a + 4b
y = a + 3b
Solving for a and b, we get a = (3x - 2y)/2 and b = (x - a)/4. Thus, any vector v in R2 can be expressed as a linear combination of x1 and x2, so x1 and x2 span R2.

(b) x1, x2, and x3 must be linearly dependent because there are more vectors than dimensions in R2. In other words, it is not possible for three linearly independent vectors to exist in R2.
One way to see this is to use the fact that the determinant of a matrix with three rows and two columns (i.e. a 3x2 matrix) is always zero. If x1, x2, and x3 were linearly independent, then the matrix with x1, x2, and x3 as its rows would have a non-zero determinant, which would contradict this fact.

(c) Since x1 and x2 form a basis for R2 and x3 is in R2, we know that Span(x1, x2, x3) is a subspace of R2. To find its dimension, we must determine how many vectors are needed to form a basis for Span(x1, x2, x3).
Since x1 and x2 are already a basis for R2, we know that any vector in Span(x1, x2, x3) can be written as a linear combination of x1, x2, and x3. Thus, we only need to consider whether x3 can be written as a linear combination of x1 and x2.
Suppose there exist scalars a and b such that x3 = ax1 + bx2. This gives us the system of equations:
2a + 4b = 7
a + 3b = -3
Solving this system, we get a = -4 and b = 3. Thus, x3 can be written as -4x1 + 3x2.
Since x3 is a linear combination of x1 and x2, we don't need all three vectors to form a basis for Span(x1, x2, x3). In fact, we can remove x3 and still have a basis for Span(x1, x2, x3), which means that Span(x1, x2, x3) is a subspace of R2 with dimension 2.

Learn more about linearly independent here: brainly.com/question/31086895

#SPJ11

The set of all integer solutions for the inequality -1 ≤ x - √5 < 4 is {-1, 0, 1, 2, 3, 4}.

The inequality:

-1 ≤ x - √5 < 4

To isolate x by adding √5 to each side:

-1 + √5 ≤ x < 4 + √5

The inequality is now expressed in terms of x with lower and upper bounds.

To find the set of all integer solutions for this inequality, we need to identify all integer values of x that fall within this range.

The integer values between -1 + √5 and 4 + √5 are:

-1 + √5 ≈ 0.236 and 4 + √5 ≈ 5.236

The integers between these two values are 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5.

The inequality is inclusive of the lower bound (-1 ≤ x - √5), we need to include the integer value that satisfies this condition.

Thus, the set of integer solutions for the inequality is:

{-1, 0, 1, 2, 3, 4}

For similar questions on integer

https://brainly.com/question/929808

#SPJ11

∂z/∂s = [tex]e^(st cos(s^6 + t^6)) * (t cos(s^6 + t^6) - 6s^5 st sin(s^6 + t^6))[/tex]

∂z/∂t = [tex]e^(st cos(s^6 + t^6)) * (s cos(s^6 + t^6) - 6t^5 st sin(s^6 + t^6))[/tex]

To use the Chain Rule, we need to express z as a function of s and t. We have:

z = [tex]e^{(r cos(θ))}[/tex], where r = st and θ = [tex](s^6 + t^6)[/tex].

First, let's find the partial derivative of z with respect to s:

∂z/∂s = (∂z/∂r) * (∂r/∂s) + (∂z/∂θ) * (∂θ/∂s)

To find (∂z/∂r), we can use the derivative of e^(r cos(θ)) with respect to r, which is simply cos(θ) * [tex]e^{(r cos(θ))}[/tex]:

∂z/∂r = cos(θ) * [tex]e^{(r cos(θ))}[/tex]

To find (∂r/∂s), we can use the fact that r = st, so:

∂r/∂s = t

To find (∂z/∂θ), we can use the derivative of e^(r cos(θ)) with respect to θ, which is -r sin(θ) * e^(r cos(θ)):

∂z/∂θ = -r sin(θ) * e^(r cos(θ))

To find (∂θ/∂s), we can use the fact that θ = s^6 + t^6, so:

∂θ/∂s = 6s^5

Putting it all together, we have:

∂z/∂s = cos(θ) * e^(r cos(θ)) * t + (-r sin(θ) * e^(r cos(θ))) * 6s^5

Simplifying this expression, we get:

∂z/∂s = e^(st cos(s^6 + t^6)) * (t cos(s^6 + t^6) - 6s^5 st sin(s^6 + t^6))

Similarly, we can find the partial derivative of z with respect to t:

∂z/∂t = (∂z/∂r) * (∂r/∂t) + (∂z/∂θ) * (∂θ/∂t)

To find (∂r/∂t), we can again use the fact that r = st, so:

∂r/∂t = s

To find (∂θ/∂t), we have:

∂θ/∂t = 6t^5

Putting it all together, we have:

∂z/∂t = cos(θ) * e^(r cos(θ)) * s + (-r sin(θ) * e^(r cos(θ))) * 6t^5

Simplifying this expression, we get:

∂z/∂t = e^(st cos(s^6 + t^6)) * (s cos(s^6 + t^6) - 6t^5 st sin(s^6 + t^6))

In summary, using the Chain Rule, we have found that:

∂z/∂s = e^(st cos(s^6 + t^6)) * (t cos(s^6 + t^6) - 6s^5 st sin(s^6 + t^6))

∂z/∂t = e^(st cos(s^6 + t^6)) * (s cos(s^6 + t^6) - 6t^5 st sin(s^6 + t^6))

These expressions represent the rate of change of z

To know more about partial derivative refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/31397807

#SPJ11

The number of fiction books is 224 if fiction book is 35 percent in the circle graph.

We have,

Total number of books = 640

Now,

From the circle graph,

Fiction is 35 percent.

Now,

35% of 640

= 35/100 x 640

= 224

Thus,

The number of fiction books is 224 if fiction book is 35 percent in the circle graph.

Learn more about percentages here:

https://brainly.com/question/11403063

#SPJ1

To minimize the amount of fencing needed, each of the five pens should have identical dimensions. To minimize the amount of fencing needed, each of the five pens should have dimensions of approximately 13.4 meters by 13.4 meters.

To minimize the amount of fencing for five identical pens adjacent to each other with a total area of 900m², you need to find the dimensions that minimize the perimeter. Let's denote the width of each pen as 'w' and the length as 'l'. Since there are five identical pens, the total width is 5w.
1. Write the area constraint equation:
Total area = 900m²
lw = 900
2. Express 'l' in terms of 'w':
l = 900/w
3. Write the perimeter equation:
Perimeter (P) = 6w + 3l
We use 6w because there are six widths (top and bottom of the pens) and 3l because there are three lengths (the sides of the pens).
4. Substitute 'l' from step 2 into the perimeter equation:
P = 6w + 3(900/w)
5. Differentiate P with respect to w:
dP/dw = 6 - (2700/w²)
6. Set dP/dw to 0 and solve for w:
6 - (2700/w²) = 0
2700/w² = 6
w² = 2700/6
w² = 450
w = √450 ≈ 21.21m
7. Find 'l' using the area constraint equation:
l = 900/w
l = 900/21.21 ≈ 42.43m
So, to minimize the amount of fencing, you should use dimensions of approximately 21.21m for the width (w) and 42.43m for the length (l) for each pen.

learn more about identical dimensions here: brainly.com/question/6828846

#SPJ11

The type of statistical testing likely to be used for a test of controls is attribute sampling. This type of sampling is used to test the effectiveness of controls by measuring the proportion of items that meet a certain criteria or attribute.

It is commonly used in audits to determine if internal controls are operating effectively. The auditor selects a sample of items and examines them to determine if they meet the established criteria. The results of the sample are then projected to the entire population. Attribute sampling is preferred over other methods such as monetary-unit sampling or classical variables sampling when the focus is on testing controls rather than testing for errors in financial statements.

The type of statistical testing likely to be used for a test of controls is attribute sampling. Attribute sampling is a technique that focuses on evaluating the presence or absence of certain characteristics (attributes) in a population, such as whether controls are functioning effectively or not.

This method is suitable for assessing controls as it helps auditors determine the rate of control deviations, which can then be used to evaluate the reliability of internal controls within a process or system. The other methods mentioned, such as monetary-unit sampling and classical variables sampling, are more commonly used for substantive testing of financial data.

Visit here to learn more about   sampling : https://brainly.com/question/30452300
#SPJ11

To write down the initial simplex tableau of the corresponding dual problem, we need to first rewrite the primal problem in standard form:
Minimize:
P(w1,w2,w3)=5w1+6w2+4w3
Subject to:
w1+2w2 + s1 =6
5w1+3w2+3w3 + s2 =24
w1,w2,w3, s1, s2 ≥0.

The dual problem is to maximize the objective function:
D(y1,y2)=6y1+24y2
Subject to:
y1+5y2 ≤5
2y1+3y2 ≤6
3y2 ≤4
y1, y2 ≥0.

The initial simplex tableau of the dual problem is as follows:

   BV  | y1    | y2     | RHS
   ----------------------------
   s1  | 1    | 5     | 5
   s2  | 2    | 3     | 6
   w3  | 0    | 3     | 4
   ----------------------------
   Z   | -6   | -24   | 0

To use the theorem of duality to find the minimum value of P in the primal problem, we need to compare the optimal values of the primal and dual problems. If they are equal, then the optimal solution to one problem provides the optimal solution to the other.

The optimal value of the dual problem is obtained by setting y1=0 and y2=4/3, which gives D(y1,y2)=32/3.

According to the theorem of duality, the optimal value of the primal problem is also 32/3. The optimal solution can be found from the last row of the simplex tableau for the dual problem. Since w3 is a basic variable with a nonzero value, we can solve for it in terms of the nonbasic variables:

w3 = 4/3 - (3/2)s1 - (1/2)s2

Substituting this expression into the constraints of the primal problem, we get:

w1+2w2 ≥6
5w1+3w2+3(4/3 - (3/2)s1 - (1/2)s2)≥24
w1,w2,s1, s2 ≥0.

Simplifying the second constraint, we get:

5w1+3w2-9/2s1 -3/2s2 ≥16

The optimal solution occurs when both constraints are satisfied with equality. From the first constraint, we have w1=6-2w2. Substituting this into the second constraint, we get:

5(6-2w2)+3w2-9/2s1 -3/2s2 = 24

Solving for w2, we get w2=5/2. Substituting this into the expression for w1, we get w1=3.

Therefore, the optimal solution to the primal problem is (w1,w2,w3) = (3, 5/2, 4/3), and the minimum value of P is:

P(3, 5/2, 4/3) = 5(3)+6(5/2)+4(4/3) = 32/3.

Refer for more,

https://brainly.com/question/31325287#

#SPJ11

1. The probability that exactly 12 students drive to school is 0.169.

2.The probability that more than 15 students drive to school is 0.027.

3. The probability that no more than 10 students drive to school is 0.004.

4. The mean and standard deviation of the sample are 13.6 and 2.4, respectively.

5. The percentage falling within 1 standard deviation of the mean is approximately 68%, which satisfies the empirical rule for normal distributions.

This problem involves the binomial distribution, since each student either drives to school (success) or does not (failure), and the probability of success is given as 0.68 for each student.

(1) The probability that exactly 12 students drive to school is given by the binomial probability mass function:

P(X = 12) [tex]= (20 choose 12) * (0.68)^12 * (1 - 0.68)^(20 - 12) = 0.169[/tex]

(2) The probability that more than 15 students drive to school is given by the complement of the probability that at most 15 students drive to school:

P(X > 15) = 1 - P(X <= 15) = 1 - sum[(20 choose i) * [tex](0.68)^i * (1 - 0.68)^{20 - i)}[/tex] for i = 0 to 15.

This is approximately 0.027.

(3) The probability that no more than 10 students drive to school is given by the cumulative distribution function:

P(X <= 10) = sum[(20 choose i) * [tex](0.68)^i * (1 - 0.68)^{20 - i}[/tex] for i = 0 to 10. This is approximately 0.004.

(4) The mean of the binomial distribution is given by the formula np, where n is the sample size and p is the probability of success.

Thus, the mean is 200.68 = 13.6.

The standard deviation of the binomial distribution is given by the formula sqrt(np(1-p)), which is approximately 2.4.

(5) The percentage falling within one standard deviation of the mean is approximately 68% by the empirical rule, which is the same as the percentage of students who drive to school in the university.

However, the empirical rule applies to normal distributions, and the binomial distribution is not exactly normal.

Nonetheless, for large sample sizes, the binomial distribution can be approximated by a normal distribution using the central limit theorem, which would make the empirical rule applicable.

For similar question on probability.

https://brainly.com/question/24756209

#SPJ11

There are 26,404 different ways to select 4 leaders from a class of 30 students with at least one girl in the group.There are different methods to approach this problem, but one way is to use the complement rule.

That is, we can find the total number of ways to select 4 leaders from the class of 30 students, and then subtract the number of ways to select 4 leaders such that no girl is selected. The difference will be the number of ways to select at least one girl.

The total number of ways to select 4 leaders from 30 students is given by the combination formula: C(30, 4) = 27,405. This means there are 27,405 different groups of 4 leaders that can be chosen from the class.

To find the number of ways to select 4 leaders with no girls, we can consider only the 14 boys in the class. The number of ways to select 4 boys from 14 is given by the combination formula: C(14, 4) = 1,001. Therefore, there are 1,001 different groups of 4 boys that can be chosen as leaders.

Now, we can subtract the number of groups of 4 boys from the total number of groups of 4 leaders to find the number of groups with at least one girl. That is: 27,405 - 1,001 = 26,404.

Therefore, there are 26,404 different ways to select 4 leaders from a class of 30 students with at least one girl in the group.

learn more about complement rule here: brainly.com/question/13655344

#SPJ11

It is absolutely False that  Every random variable with a Laplace probability model does not necessarily have a uniform probability distribution.

A Laplace distribution is a continuous probability distribution that is symmetric around its mean and has fat tails compared to a normal distribution. On the other hand, a uniform distribution is also a continuous probability distribution but has a constant probability density function over a specified range. Although both probability models have different characteristics, they can be used to model different types of phenomena. Therefore, it is incorrect to assume that every random variable with a Laplace probability model must have a uniform probability distribution.

False. A random variable with a Laplace probability model does not necessarily have a uniform probability distribution. A Laplace distribution is characterized by its location parameter (μ) and scale parameter (b), which determine the shape of the distribution. It is double peaked, symmetric, and centered around the location parameter. On the other hand, a uniform distribution has a constant probability across a specified range of values, resulting in a single rectangular peak. These two distributions are distinct in their shapes and properties, and one cannot be concluded from the presence of the other.

Visit here to learn more about  probability : https://brainly.com/question/30034780
#SPJ11

The mean of the data is approximately 0.47, the median is 0.45, and the mode is 0.31.

To find the mean, median, and mode of the given data on the rate of fatal alcohol-impaired car crashes per 100 million vehicle miles of travel, we will first need to arrange the data in ascending order:

0.31, 0.31, 0.31, 0.32, 0.32, 0.34, 0.34, 0.34, 0.38, 0.43, 0.46, 0.54, 0.55, 0.58, 0.62, 0.63, 0.66, 0.67, 0.68, 0.70

Mean: To find the mean, add up all the values and divide by the total number of values (20 in this case). The mean is approximately 0.47.

Median: The median is the middle value when the data is ordered. Since there are 20 values, we will take the average of the 10th and 11th values (0.43 and 0.46). The median is 0.445, but we will round to one more decimal place, so the median is 0.45.

Mode: The mode is the value that occurs most frequently in the data set. In this case, the mode is 0.31, as it appears three times.

To learn more about median click here

brainly.com/question/30891252

#SPJ11

Angle AFE is equal to 48 degrees. This can be found by applying the angle bisector theorem and using properties of equilateral and isosceles triangles. The answer is B).

We can start by finding the measure of angle EBC. Since BE=CD and triangle BCD is isosceles, we have angle BCD = angle CBD. Therefore, angle EBC = angle CBD + angle CBE = angle BCD + angle CBE = 60° + angle CBE.

Now, let's look at triangle ACD. We know that angle CAD = 18° and angle ACD = 60° (since triangle ABC is equilateral). Therefore, angle ADC = 180° - angle CAD - angle ACD = 102°.

Since AC is the angle bisector of angle BCD, we have angle ACB = angle ACD = 60°. Therefore, angle BCD = 120°.

Now, let's look at triangle CBE. We know that angle CBE + angle BCE + angle EBC = 180°. Since triangle ABC is equilateral, angle BCE = 60°. Therefore, angle CBE + 60° + 60° + angle CBE + 60° = 180°, which simplifies to 3angle CBE = 60° and angle CBE = 20°.

Finally, we can find angle AFE. Since angle FAE = angle CAD + angle CAF = 18° + 12° = 30°, we have angle AFE = 180° - angle ADC - angle EBC - angle FAE = 180° - 102° - 60° - 30° = 48°.

Therefore, the answer is (B) 48°.

To know more about equilateral triangle:

https://brainly.com/question/3461022

#SPJ1

An estimate for the total number of dragonflies around the lake is 930 by proportional equation.

Let x be the total number of dragonflies around the lake.

We know that on Saturday, Greta caught 120 dragonflies and tagged them.

Therefore, the proportion of tagged dragonflies in the lake is 120/x.

On Sunday, Greta caught 124 dragonflies, and 16 of them were tagged. This means that the proportion of tagged dragonflies in the lake is 16/124.

Since the same proportion of dragonflies were tagged on both days, we can set up an equation:

120/x = 16/124

Solving for x, we get:

x = (120 × 124) / 16 = 930

Therefore, an estimate for the total number of dragonflies around the lake is 930.

To learn more on Equation:

https://brainly.com/question/10413253

#SPJ1

The change in angular momentum of the bolt is 11.25 kg m²/s.

Angular momentum is a measure of an object's tendency to keep rotating. It is calculated as the product of the object's moment of inertia and its angular velocity. The change in angular momentum is given by the torque applied to the object over a certain time interval. In this case, 45 Nm of torque is applied to a large bolt in 0.25s, and we need to find the change in angular momentum of the bolt.

To find the change in angular momentum, we need to first calculate the moment of inertia of the bolt. This depends on the shape and size of the bolt. Once we have the moment of inertia, we can use the formula:

Change in angular momentum = torque x time interval

Substituting the given values, we get:

Change in angular momentum = 45 Nm x 0.25 s = 11.25 Nms

Therefore, the change in angular momentum of the bolt is 11.25 Nms. This means that the bolt's tendency to rotate has increased by this amount due to the torque applied to it.

Learn more about angular momentum here :-

https://brainly.com/question/15898158

#SPJ11

Answer:

6

Step-by-step explanation:

The answer is 6 because 7-1=6

Answer:

6

Step-by-step explanation:

The area of the triangle BCD is 55.4 centimetres squared.

A right angle triangle is a triangle that has one of its angles as 90 degrees. The area of the right triangle can be found as follows:

area of the right triangle = 1 / 2 bh

where

Therefore, let's find the base and height of the right triangle using trigonometric ratios.

Hence,

cos 60 = adjacent  / hypotenuse

cos 60 = b / 16

cross multiply

b = 16 cos 60

b = 8 cm

Hence,

h² = 16² - 8²

h = √256 - 64

h = √192

h = 13.8564064606

h = 13.85 cm

Therefore,

area of the right triangle = 1 / 2 × 8 × 13.85

area of the right triangle = 110.851251684 / 2

area of the right triangle = 55.4256258422

area of the right triangle = 55.4 cm²

learn more on area here: https://brainly.com/question/29183952

#SPJ1

The polynomial of the can not be factored over set of real numbers is x²+4x+5

A polynomial is an expression consisting of variable and coefficient involved mathematical operations like addition and subtraction e.t.c

A quadratic expression is derived by the formula;

x² - (alpha+beta)x + (alpha)(beta)

Where alpha and beta are the roots of the expression.

For a quadratic expression to a real numbers as root, b = (alpha+beta)

c = (alpha)(beta)

For the expression x² +4x+5

there are no factors of 5 that their sum will give 4. Therefore the polynomial that can not be factored by real number is x²+4x+5

learn more about factorization of polynomial from

https://brainly.com/question/25829061

#SPJ1

The function f(x) = x/(x+2) satisfies the hypotheses of the Mean Value Theorem on the interval [1, 4], and the number c that satisfies the conclusion of the Mean Value Theorem is c = 2.29.

To verify that f(x) satisfies the hypotheses of the Mean Value Theorem on [1, 4], we need to check that f(x) is continuous on [1, 4] and differentiable on (1, 4).

First, we note that f(x) is a rational function and is therefore continuous on its domain, which includes [1, 4].

To show that f(x) is differentiable on (1, 4), we calculate the derivative:

f'(x) = (2-x)/(x+2)²

Since the denominator is never zero on (1, 4), f(x) is differentiable on (1, 4).

By the Mean Value Theorem, there exists a number c in (1, 4) such that:

f'(c) = (f(4) - f(1))/(4 - 1)

Substituting the values of f(x) and f'(x) into this equation, we get:

(2-c)/(c+2)² = (4/3 - 1/3)/(4-1)

Simplifying and solving for c, we get:

c = 2.29

To know more about Mean Value Theorem, refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/30403137#

#SPJ11

Ans .: The width of the border cannot be negative, the width of the border should be approximately 0.62 feet.

To find the width of the border, let's follow these steps:

1. Find the area of the rectangular stained-glass window: The window measures 2 feet by 1 foot, so the area is 2 ft × 1 ft = 2 square feet.

2. Determine the area of the window including the border: You have 4 square feet of glass for the border, so the total area will be the window area plus border area, which is 2 square feet (window) + 4 square feet (border) = 6 square feet.

3. Set up an equation to solve for the width of the border: Let x be the width of the border. The new dimensions of the window including the border will be (2 + 2x) feet by (1 + 2x) feet, since the border is of uniform width around the window.

4. The equation for the total area including the border is (2 + 2x)(1 + 2x) = 6 square feet.

5. Expand the equation and solve for x:
(2 + 2x)(1 + 2x) = 6
2 + 4x + 4x^2 = 6
4x^2 + 4x - 4 = 0
x^2 + x - 1 = 0

This quadratic equation does not have rational roots, so we'll use the quadratic formula to solve for x:

x = (-B ± √(B² - 4AC)) / 2A
x = (-1 ± √(1² - 4(1)(-1))) / 2(1)
x ≈ 0.62 or x ≈ -1.62

Since the width of the border cannot be negative, the width of the border should be approximately 0.62 feet.

Learn more about :

area : brainly.com/question/28016184

#SPJ11

The graphical representation that would be best to display the data is Circle graph (Option A)

One graphical representation that is commonly used for categorical data is a circle graph, also known as a pie chart. A circle graph displays the data as a circle divided into sectors, with each sector representing a category and its size proportional to the corresponding numerical value.

To create a circle graph for this data, we first calculate the percentage of purchases in each category by dividing the number of purchases by the total number of purchases (125) and multiplying by 100. This gives us:

Health & Medicine: 27/125 x 100% = 21.6%

Beauty: 17/125 x 100% = 13.6%

Household: 25/125 x 100% = 20%

Grocery: 56/125 x 100% = 44.8%

We can then use these percentages to draw the corresponding sectors in the circle graph, as shown below:

The circle graph allows us to easily see the relative proportions of the different types of items purchased. We can see that grocery items were the most commonly purchased (44.8%), followed by health & medicine (21.6%), household (20%), and beauty (13.6%).

Hence the correct option is (a) Circle Graph

To know more about Graph here

https://brainly.com/question/17267403

#SPJ1