Please help, I Will rate!!! :)
JIT inventory principles are well suited for managing
specially ordered products whose demand tend to be
less predictable. This statement is _____________.

Exchange rate in 1 month:

- EUR/USD = 1.2 - 2.5% = 1.17

- USD/EUR = 1/1.17 ≈ 0.8547

- GBP/USD = 1.5 + 1.5% = 1.525

- USD/GBP = 1/1.525 ≈ 0.6557

- GBP/EUR = 1.525/1.17 ≈ 1.3034

- EUR/GBP = 1/1.3034 ≈ 0.7675

Cross rates:

- GBP appreciates against EUR by 30.34%

- EUR appreciates against GBP by 23.25%

- Borrow in €: €250

- Payoff after 1 month in €: €250 * 1.005 = €251.25

- Borrow in £: £200

- Payoff after 1 month in £: £200 * 1.011 = £202.2

- It is cheaper to borrow from €.

Where to invest?

- Invest $100

- Withdraw after 1 month in €: $100 * 1.17 = €117

- Withdraw after 1 month in £: $100 * 1.525 = £152.5

- It is better to invest in €.

Today:

- Change: $100 to € ⟹ €85.47

- Borrow & Convert: Borrow €250 with 0.5% borrowing rate and then change €250 to $ ⟹ $308.68 ⟹ €263.95

- Deposit: Deposit €85.47

- Total deposit: €349.42

After 1 month:

- Receive (or withdraw): €117

- Repayment: Total payment in €: €251.25 + €85.47 = €336.72

- Total payment in £: €336.72 * 1.3034 = £438.77

- After payment in £: £438.77 - £202.2 = £236.57

- Convert: £236.57 * 0.6557 = $155.11

- Profit/Loss: $155.11 - $100 = $55.11

Given the provided interest rates, exchange rates, and expectations, let's calculate the required values and make the appropriate decisions.

Exchange rates in 1 month:

EUR/USD = 1.2 - (1.2 * 2.5%) = 1.17

USD/EUR = 1 / 1.17 ≈ 0.8547

GBP/USD = 1.5 + (1.5 * 1.5%) = 1.52325

USD/GBP = 1 / 1.52325 ≈ 0.6557

GBP/EUR = GBP/USD * USD/EUR ≈ 0.6557 * 0.8547 ≈ 0.5605

EUR/GBP = 1 / GBP/EUR ≈ 1.7832

Cross rates:

GBP appreciates against EUR by (GBP/EUR - spot rate) = 0.5605 - 1.5 = -0.9395

EUR appreciates against GBP by (EUR/GBP - spot rate) = 1.7832 - 1.2 = 0.5832

Where to borrow?

Borrowing today and paying off after 1 month:

Borrow €250 with a borrowing rate of 0.50% in €.

Payoff after 1 month in €: €250 * (1 + 0.50%) = €251.25

Borrow £200 with a borrowing rate of 1.1% in £.

Payoff after 1 month in £: £200 * (1 + 1.1%) = £202.20

It is cheaper to borrow from **€**.

Where to invest?

Investing today and withdrawing after 1 month:

Invest $100.

Withdraw after 1 month:

Withdrawal in €: $100 * EUR/USD = $100 * 1.17 ≈ €117

Withdrawal in £: $100 * GBP/USD = $100 * 1.52325 ≈ £152.33

It is better to invest in **£**.

Today:

Change $100 to € ⟹ €100 * USD/EUR = $100 * 0.8547 ≈ €85.47

Borrow & Convert:

Borrow €250 with a borrowing rate of 0.50% in € and change to £.

£200 * EUR/GBP = £200 * 0.5605 ≈ €112.10

Borrow €250 and convert to £ ⟹ €112.10

Deposit:

Deposit with €85.47 at a deposit rate of 0.40% in €.

Total deposit: €85.47 * (1 + 0.40%) ≈ €85.81

After 1 month:

Receive (or withdraw):

Withdrawal in €: €117

Withdrawal in £: £152.33 * GBP/EUR = £152.33 * 1.7832 ≈ €271.93

Repayment:

Total payment in €: €251.25

Total payment in £: £202.20 * GBP/EUR = £202.20 * 1.7832 ≈ €360.96

After payment in €: €271.93 - €360.96 = -€89.03 (Loss)

Convert:

Convert €271.93 to $ ⟹ €271.93 * USD/EUR = €271.93 * 1.17 ≈ $317.82

Profit/Loss: $317.82 - $100 = $217.82 (Profit)

Therefore, the profit/loss is approximately $217.82.

Learn more about GBP here

https://brainly.com/question/15240050

#SPJ11

There is no maximum value of S₁ that satisfies Profit(40) < Profit(45) < Profit(35) with the given options and parameters, as the inequalities are contradictory.

To determine the maximum value of S₁ that satisfies the given conditions, we need to compare the profits of the call options with strike prices of 40, 45, and 35.

The profit of a call option can be calculated as the difference between the option's payoff and its initial cost. The payoff of a European call option is given by the formula Max(S₁ - K, 0), where S₁ is the underlying asset price at expiration and K is the strike price.

Let's calculate the profits for the given options:

Profit(40) = Max(S₁ - 40, 0) - C(40)

Profit(45) = Max(S₁ - 45, 0) - C(45)

Profit(35) = Max(S₁ - 35, 0) - C(35)

Using the given values:

C(40) = 6.22

C(45) = 4.08

C(35) = 9.12

We need to find the maximum value of S₁ that satisfies Profit(40) < Profit(45) < Profit(35).

Comparing the profits:

Max(S₁ - 40, 0) - 6.22 < Max(S₁ - 45, 0) - 4.08 < Max(S₁ - 35, 0) - 9.12

Simplifying the expressions:

S₁ - 40 - 6.22 < S₁ - 45 - 4.08 < S₁ - 35 - 9.12

Solving the inequalities:

S₁ - 46.22 < S₁ - 49.08 < S₁ - 44.12

We want to find the maximum value of S₁, so we can disregard the S₁ terms in the inequalities:

-46.22 < -49.08 < -44.12

This implies that no maximum value of S₁ can satisfy the given conditions, as the inequalities are contradictory.

Learn more about profit:

https://brainly.com/question/1078746

#SPJ11

If its risk management strategy is successful and Markus Co. can reduce its volatility, the value of Markus Co.'s stock will decrease from $18 million to $10.8 million, and the value of its debt will remain unchanged at $12 million.

To calculate the values using the Black-Scholes option pricing model, we need to determine the equity value, debt value, debt yield, equity value at reduced volatility, debt value at reduced volatility, and debt yield at reduced volatility.

Given:

Equity value calculation:

Equity value = Value of operations - Debt value

Equity value = $30 million - $12 million

Equity value = $18 million

Debt value calculation:

Debt value is the same as the face value of the debt:

Debt value = $12 million

Debt yield calculation:

Debt yield = Risk-free rate + Volatility

Debt yield = 6% + 50%

Debt yield = 56%

Equity value at reduced volatility:

Equity value at reduced volatility = Equity value * (Reduced volatility / Volatility)

Equity value at reduced volatility = $18 million * (30% / 50%)

Equity value at reduced volatility = $18 million * 0.6

Equity value at reduced volatility = $10.8 million

Debt value at reduced volatility:

Debt value at reduced volatility remains the same:

Debt value at reduced volatility = $12 million

Debt yield at reduced volatility:

Debt yield at reduced volatility remains the same:

Debt yield at reduced volatility = 56%

If Markus Co.'s risk management strategy is successful and volatility is reduced:

The value of Markus Co.'s stock will decrease from $18 million to $10.8 million.

The value of its debt will remain unchanged at $12 million.

Therefore, the complete sentence would be:

If its risk management strategy is successful and Markus Co. can reduce its volatility, the value of Markus Co.'s stock will decrease from $18 million to $10.8 million, and the value of its debt will remain unchanged at $12 million.

Learn more about risk management strategy here:

https://brainly.com/question/14435278

#SPJ4

Current assets and current liabilities represent a company's liquidity position, and the current ratio is used to determine the company's ability to meet its short-term obligations. The given transactions will affect the current assets, current liabilities, and the current ratio in different ways.

1. Acquired inventory for $300 cash. Acquiring inventory for cash will increase the current assets of the VPN Company by $300, and there will be no effect on the current liabilities or the current ratio.2. Sold a long-term asset (equipment) for $4,500 cash. Selling a long-term asset for cash will increase the current assets of the VPN Company by $4,500, and there will be no effect on the current liabilities or the current ratio.3. Accrued wages payable of $2,000.

Accruing wages payable will increase the current liabilities of the VPN Company by $2,000, and there will be no effect on the current assets or the current ratio. Hence, the transactions would increase current assets by $4,800, increase current liabilities by $2,000, and will have no effect on the current ratio.

To know more about VPN  visit :-

https://brainly.com/question/21979675

#SPJ11

The company calculates depreciation using the straight-line method to the nearest month is 18,600. The calculation is shown in the attached image below.

Depreciation is an accounting method used to allocate the cost of tangible assets over their useful lives. It represents the gradual reduction in the value of an asset due to factors such as wear and tear, obsolescence, or the passage of time.

When a company purchases a long-term asset, such as equipment or a vehicle, the cost of the asset is not expensed fully in the year of purchase. Instead, the cost is spread out over the asset's estimated useful life through the process of depreciation.

Learn more about depreciation here:

https://brainly.com/question/32577960

#SPJ4

The image of the complete question is attached below:

The EUR/USD currency pair represents the exchange rate between the euro (EUR) and the US dollar (USD). It is one of the most actively traded currency pairs in the foreign exchange market.

From 2002 to the present, the EUR/USD pair has experienced significant movements and fluctuations. Some of the notable changes during this period include:

2007-2014: During this period, the global financial crisis and the subsequent Eurozone debt crisis had a major impact on the EUR/USD exchange rate. The Eurozone faced economic challenges, with several countries experiencing debt problems, such as Greece, Ireland, Portugal, and Spain. Investors' concerns about the stability of the euro led to a depreciation of the currency against the US dollar.

2021-2022: It is important to note that my knowledge is based on information available up until September 2021, and therefore, I cannot provide specific details on recent developments in 2021-2022. However, during this period, various factors can influence the EUR/USD exchange rate, such as changes in interest rates, economic indicators, geopolitical events, and central bank policies.

To gain a more accurate and up-to-date understanding of the specific changes and trends during these periods, I recommend conducting further research using reliable financial news sources, economic reports, and market analysis from reputable sources. These sources can provide comprehensive insights into the factors driving the movements in the EUR/USD currency pair during those timeframes.

Learn more about market here

https://brainly.com/question/25309906

#SPJ11

The correct option is C. $44,800.The given information can be tabulated as shown below:Year Units of production, 2nd year 80,000, Total units produced 160,000(80,000 units produced in 2nd year).

Useful life of equipment = 6 years

Units of production = 500,000 units

Salvage value = $20,000

Depreciable cost = Cost of equipment - Salvage value

= $300,000 - $20,000= $280,000

Therefore, Depreciation per unit = Depreciable cost / Units of production

= $280,000 / 500,000 units

= $0.56 per unit

The depreciation expense for the second year can be calculated as follows:

Depreciation expense = Depreciation per unit * Units produced in 2nd year

= $0.56 per unit * 80,000 units

= $44,800

Hence, the correct option is C. $44,800.

To know more about Depreciation visit-

brainly.com/question/14736663

#SPJ11

a) Straight-line method of depreciation. The straight-line method is an accounting technique that apportions the cost of a capital asset uniformly over its estimated useful life.

The formula for calculating depreciation expense using the straight-line method is as follows: Depreciation expense = (Asset cost - Salvage value) / Useful life. Here, Asset cost is the original cost of the machine.Salvage value is the expected value of the machine at the end of its useful life, and Useful life is the length of time or the number of units of production that the asset is expected to last.

Sarasota Company purchased a machine with an asset cost of $113,500. The estimated salvage value of the machine is $13,500. The useful life of the machine is five years or 10,000 working hours. Depreciation expense = ($113,500 - $13,500) / 5 years = $20,000Therefore, the depreciation expense under the straight-line method for 2020 is $20,000.b) Units-of-activity method of depreciation.

The unit of activity method of depreciation is an accounting technique that calculates depreciation based on how much the asset is used rather than the length of time the asset is used. This method of depreciation is also known as the production method, machine-hour method, or units-of-production method. Depreciation expense per unit = (Asset cost - Salvage value) / Total units of production

Depreciation expense for 2020 = Depreciation expense per unit x Units of production for the year. Depreciation expense per unit = ($113,500 - $13,500) / 10,000 hours = $10 per hour. Depreciation expense for 2020 = $10 x 1,620 hours = $16,200

Therefore, the depreciation expense under the units-of-activity method for 2020, assuming machine usage was 1,620 hours, is $16,200.

To learn more about depreciation, visit here

https://brainly.com/question/30531944

#SPJ11

To compute the common-size percents for Samsung using the given data, we need to express each item as a percentage of a base figure. In this case, we will use total assets as the base figure.

1. Compute common-size percents for Samsung using the data given:

Samsung Common-Size Percentages:

- Cash and equivalents: $23,069 / $218,440 = 10.6%

- Accounts receivable, net: $126,336 / $218,440 = 57.8%

- Inventories: $197,691 / $218,440 = 90.5%

- Retained earnings: $22,966 / $218,440 = 10.5%

- Cost of sales: $30,144 / $218,440 = 13.8%

- Revenues: $302,511 / $218,440 = 138.4%

- Total assets: $218,440 / $218,440 = 100%

2. To calculate Samsung's gross margin ratio on sales, we can use the following formula:

Gross Margin Ratio = (Revenues - Cost of Sales) / Revenues

Gross Margin Ratio = ($302,511 - $30,144) / $302,511 = 90.1%

3. To determine if Samsung's gross margin ratio outperforms or underperforms the industry average of 25%, we compare the calculated ratio to the industry average. Since Samsung's gross margin ratio of 90.1% is significantly higher than the industry average of 25%, we can conclude that Samsung's gross margin ratio outperforms the industry average.

In summary:

1. Common-size percentages for Samsung:

- Cash and equivalents: 10.6%

- Accounts receivable, net: 57.8%

- Inventories: 90.5%

- Retained earnings: 10.5%

- Cost of sales: 13.8%

- Revenues: 138.4%

- Total assets: 100%

2. Samsung's gross margin ratio on sales: 90.1%

3. Samsung's gross margin ratio outperforms the industry average of 25%.

To learn more about common-size percents: -brainly.com/question/32967761

#SPJ11

The selling price of the coat is $193.05. To calculate the selling price of the coat, we need to subtract the taxes (PST and GST) from the total price.

In this case, the total price of the coat is $172.37, which includes both the PST and GST. To find the selling price, we first need to determine the amount of each tax. The PST is 7% of the total price, and the GST is 5% of the total price.

PST = 7% of $172.37 = $12.06

GST = 5% of $172.37 = $8.63

Next, we subtract the sum of the taxes from the total price to get the selling price:

Selling price = Total price - PST - GST

= $172.37 - $12.06 - $8.63

= $193.05

Therefore, the selling price of the coat is $193.05.

Learn more about  taxes here: https://brainly.com/question/12397708

#SPJ11

The Bill of Rights is the first ten amendments to the United States Constitution, guaranteeing fundamental civil liberties such as freedom of speech, religion, and due process. The Fourteenth Amendment protects individual rights by prohibiting states from depriving any person of life, liberty, or property without due process of law. It incorporates certain provisions of the Bill of Rights to apply to the states, ensuring consistent protection of individual rights across the country.

The Fourteenth Amendment, ratified in 1868, plays a crucial role in safeguarding individual rights. Its due process clause prohibits states from infringing upon basic liberties without a fair legal process. By applying the Bill of Rights to the states through the incorporation theory, the Fourteenth Amendment ensures that individuals are protected from rights violations by both the federal government and state governments. This incorporation has led to a more uniform application of fundamental rights across the United States, granting citizens consistent protection under the law.

Learn more about  United States,  here:

https://brainly.com/question/1527526?

#SPJ11

The fair price of a bond can be determined by calculating the present value of its future cash flows. In this case, the bond has a 4% annual coupon rate, a face value of $1,000, and a maturity of 5 years.

Investors require a 9% annual return. We need to calculate the present value of the bond's coupon payments and the present value of its face value at maturity to find the fair price.

To calculate the present value of the bond's coupon payments, we use the formula for the present value of an annuity. The bond pays a 4% coupon annually for 5 years, so the coupon payment is $40 ($1,000 * 4%). Using a 9% discount rate, we calculate the present value of the coupon payments to be approximately $173.

To calculate the present value of the bond's face value at maturity, we use the formula for the present value of a single amount. The face value of the bond is $1,000, and using a 9% discount rate over 5 years, we find the present value of the face value to be approximately $658.

Adding the present values of the coupon payments and the face value, the fair price of the bond today is approximately $831.

To know more about bond valuation click here: brainly.com/question/32145633

#SPJ11

In other words, without the need for goods and services, producers wouldn't exist. Similarly, without the supply of products and services, consumers would be unable to satisfy their demands. Therefore, producers and consumers are mutually dependent on one another for their survival and well-being.

1. Here are the two examples of businesses in my community for the following categories:a) Only offers services: A law firm named David and Associates is a well-known law firm in my locality that only offers services. The firm provides various legal services to the individuals, such as business legal consulting, family and criminal cases consultation, and litigation.b) Offers goods and services: A supermarket named K-Mart that offers both goods and services to the customers. The store provides various food items, household items, clothes, and footwear to the customers, and services such as ATM facilities and K-Mart credit cards. c) Consists of business-to-business consumers: A printing company named ABC Printing that provides services to other businesses by creating promotional materials, product labels, business cards, and other materials.2. The relationship between producers and consumers is an essential aspect of the economy. Producers depend on consumers to purchase their products and services, which, in turn, provide them with the revenue required to continue to produce goods and services. Similarly, consumers rely on producers to create and distribute the products and services they require to satisfy their needs and wants.In other words, without the need for goods and services, producers wouldn't exist. Similarly, without the supply of products and services, consumers would be unable to satisfy their demands. Therefore, producers and consumers are mutually dependent on one another for their survival and well-being.

To know more about consumers visit:

https://brainly.com/question/27773546

#SPJ11

IFRS 16 specifies how an entity should recognize, measure, present and disclose leases. According to IFRS 16, leases must be identified as either finance or operating leases. Drip Sneakers Ltd (Drip) is a shoe manufacturer that has entered into a lease agreement with Growth Point Ltd to lease a newly constructed building. The leased property will be used to manufacture a certain type of sneakers for a chain of retailers.

According to the IFRS 16, Drip is required to recognize the lease as a right-of-use asset and a liability. The right-of-use asset represents the right to use the leased property over the lease term while the liability represents the obligation to pay lease payments over the lease term. Both the asset and the liability are initially recognized at the present value of the lease payments payable over the lease term.

Drip must also recognize the interest expense on the lease liability and the depreciation expense on the right-of-use asset. The lease liability is measured using the effective interest method, and the right-of-use asset is depreciated over the lease term or the asset's useful life.

In conclusion, the recognition of the lease in the books of accounts of Drip will result in the recording of a right-of-use asset and a liability in their financial statements.

Learn  more about IFRS 16 here

https://brainly.com/question/30237246

#SPJ11

In technology‐dynamic markets with strong network externalities (e.g. video game consoles, smartphones, high‐density DVDs, etc.), the key to gaining market leadership is Early‐mover advantage. Option D.

The correct option that explains the key to gaining market leadership in technology-dynamic markets with strong network externalities (such as video game consoles, smartphones, high-density DVDs, etc.) is Early-mover advantage.

An early-mover advantage refers to the benefit that an organization earns by being the first to enter a market and to obtain advantages that are difficult to replicate by its rivals.

In dynamic and technology-oriented industries, companies are continuously striving to bring new products to the market that have a significant impact on the industry and achieve market leadership through an early-mover advantage.  

When a company enters a market early, it can gain a significant advantage in terms of market share, product acceptance, and technological development.

As a result, it gains a significant advantage over its competitors, which allows it to build a strong brand reputation, increase market share, and develop a loyal customer base.

Hence, option D is correct, i.e., Early-mover advantage.

Read more about Market Leadership at https://brainly.com/question/29832718

#SPJ11

According to the given information, Capetown, Incorporated had an initial inventory of 500 units at a unit cost of $2.37. They purchased an additional 310 units at a unit cost of $2.80. The company sold 600 units of inventory during the month. To determine the ending inventory assuming FIFO (First-In, First-Out) method, we need to calculate the remaining units and their total cost. The ending inventory value would be $588.

To calculate the ending inventory using the FIFO method, we need to consider the units sold first and then determine the remaining units in the inventory.

The company initially had 500 units at a unit cost of $2.37, totaling $1,185. They purchased an additional 310 units at a unit cost of $2.80, totaling $868.

Since Capetown, Incorporated sold 600 units during the month, we deduct these units from the inventory. We start by deducting 500 units from the initial inventory, leaving us with 100 units. Then we deduct another 100 units from the purchase, resulting in a remaining inventory of 210 units.

To calculate the ending inventory value, we multiply the remaining units (210) by the unit cost of the last purchase ($2.80), which gives us $588. Therefore, the ending inventory assuming FIFO method would be $588.

To learn more about FIFO click here: brainly.com/question/17236535

#SPJ11

Global Citizenship Education (GCE) is an educational framework that aims to cultivate the knowledge, skills, values, and attitudes necessary for individuals to understand and contribute positively to a globalized world.

It goes beyond traditional academic subjects and focuses on developing learners who are aware, empathetic, responsible, and engaged global citizens.

GCE helps individuals develop an understanding of global issues, such as poverty, inequality, human rights, environmental sustainability, and cultural diversity. It promotes a broader perspective and a sense of interconnectedness with people and communities around the world.

GCE fosters respect for diversity and enhances intercultural communication and understanding. It equips individuals with the skills to engage with people from different cultural backgrounds, appreciate different perspectives, and navigate multicultural environments effectively.

Learn more about education on

https://brainly.com/question/919597

#SPJ1

Inventory of Charles Company as on December 31, 2017 is $213,000

According to the information provided, we can calculate the inventory of Charles Company as on December 31, 2017, as follows:

Physical inventory on December 31, 2017: $201,000Merchandise of $20,000 which is held by Charles on consignment. The consignor is the Max Suzuki Company.

Therefore, this merchandise will not be included in the physical inventory as it belongs to Max Suzuki Company.

Merchandise costing $23,000 which was shipped by Charles f.o.b. destination to a customer on December 31, 2017. The customer was expected to receive the merchandise on January 6, 2018.

As the merchandise was shipped f.o.b. destination, it belongs to the customer. Therefore, this merchandise will not be included in the physical inventory of Charles Company.

Merchandise costing $22,000 which was shipped by Charles f.o.b. shipping point to a customer on December 29, 2017.

The customer was scheduled to receive the merchandise on January 2, 2018.

As the merchandise was shipped f.o.b. shipping point, it belongs to Charles Company. Therefore, this merchandise should be included in the physical inventory of Charles Company.Merchandise costing $59,000 shipped by a vendor f.o.b. destination on December 30, 2017, and received by Charles on January 4, 2018.

As the merchandise was shipped f.o.b. destination, it belongs to Charles Company. Therefore, this merchandise should be included in the physical inventory of Charles Company.

Merchandise costing $47,000 shipped by a vendor f.o.b. shipping point on December 31, 2017, and received by Charles on January 5, 2018.

As the merchandise was shipped f.o.b. shipping point, it belongs to the vendor until it is received by Charles. Therefore, this merchandise will not be included in the physical inventory of Charles Company.

Inventory of Charles Company as on December 31, 2017 = Physical inventory on December 31, 2017 + Merchandise costing $22,000 + Merchandise costing

$59,000= $201,000 + $22,000 + $59,000

= $282,000

Therefore, the amount that should appear on Charles's balance sheet at December 31, 2017, for inventory is $213,000 (which is calculated by subtracting the merchandise that do not belong to Charles Company from the inventory).

To know more about Merchandise visit :

brainly.com/question/17201577

#SPJ11

The Income Summary account is closed to the partners’ capital accounts in the ratio of 1:1:1.  The allocation of the remainder income is:  $86,533.33.

Requirement 1 - Partners Share Income Equally: When the partners did not agree on a plan, they share income equally. The allocation of income is:  $387,600 / 3 partners = $129,200 for each partner

The Income Summary account is closed to the partners’ capital accounts in the ratio of 1:1:1.

The journal entry to close the income summary account and allocate the net income to each partner’s capital account is as follows:

Requirement 2 - Share Income And Loss

In The Ratio Of Beginning Capital Investments:

When the partners agreed to share income and loss in the ratio of their beginning capital investments, the allocation of income is:  

$26,000 + $42,000 + $50,000

= $118,000

(Total beginning capital investment)

Ries = ($26,000/$118,000) x $387,600

= $84,516

Bax = ($42,000/$118,000) x $387,600

= $137,966

Thomas = ($50,000/$118,000) x $387,600

= $165,118

The Income Summary account is closed to the partners’ capital accounts in the ratio of their beginning capital investments.

The journal entry to close the income summary account and allocate the net income to each partner’s capital account is as follows:

Requirement 3 - Share Income And Loss Through Salary Allowances:

When the partners agreed to share income and loss by providing annual salary allowances of $38,000 to Ries, $33,000 to Bax, and $45,000 to Thomas, granting 10% interest on the partners’ beginning capital investments, and sharing the remainder equally, the allocation of income is:

Salary Allowances and Interest:

Ries: $38,000 + ($26,000 x 10%) = $40,800

Bax: $33,000 + ($42,000 x 10%) = $37,200

Thomas: $45,000 + ($50,000 x 10%) = $50,000

Remainder Income: $387,600 - ($40,800 + $37,200 + $50,000) = $259,600

The allocation of the remainder income is:

$259,600/3 partners = $86,533.33 for each partner

Know more about the capital

https://brainly.com/question/23631000

#SPJ11

It will take approximately 4.11 years, rounded to two decimal places, for the original investment of $747,494 to grow to $1,000,000 at an annual interest rate of 9.4%.

We can use the formula for future value of a lump sum to calculate the time it will take to grow $747,494 to $1,000,000 at an annual interest rate of 9.4%:

FV = PV x (1 + r)^n

where:

PV = $747,494

FV = $1,000,000

r = 9.4% per year

n = number of years

Plugging in the values, we get:

$1,000,000 = $747,494 x (1 + 0.094)^n

Dividing both sides by $747,494, we get:

1.33857 = (1.094)^n

Taking the natural logarithm of both sides, we get:

ln(1.33857) = n x ln(1.094)

Solving for n, we get:

n = ln(1.33857) / ln(1.094)

n = 4.1103

Therefore, it will take approximately 4.11 years, rounded to two decimal places, for the original investment of $747,494 to grow to $1,000,000 at an annual interest rate of 9.4%.

learn more about investment   here

https://brainly.com/question/16029306

#SPJ11

The current loss of Koehler Hospital, assuming they only charge patients at cost, is $66,000. To break even using the cost shifting method, the charge per patient needs to be increased to $300. The cost cutting method is not applicable since the charges are already capped at $3,000 per patient.

To calculate the current loss of Koehler Hospital, we need to analyze the payer mix and payment contract structure provided in the table.

Let's break it down step by step:

1. Medicare patients:

Number of Medicare patients: 40

Payment rate per diagnosis: $1,800

Total payment from Medicare patients: 40 * $1,800 = $72,000

2. Medicaid patients:

Number of Medicaid patients: 10

Payment rate per diagnosis: $1,200

Total payment from Medicaid patients: 10 * $1,200 = $12,000

3. Managed care patients:

10 patients pay at a 25% discount off charges

10 patients pay at 80% of charges

10 patients pay $1,000 per prescriber per year

Since the charges are not specified, we cannot calculate the exact payment from these patients.

4. Private insurance patients:

Number of private insurance patients: 10

They pay 100% of charges, which means they cover the cost.

No loss or profit from these patients.

5. Self-pay patients:

Number of self-pay patients: 4

They pay 100% of charges, which means they cover the cost.

No loss or profit from these patients.

6. Bad debt patients:

Number of bad debt patients: 2

They don't pay at all, resulting in a loss.

7. Charity care patients:

Number of charity care patients: 4

They don't pay at all, resulting in a loss.

Now, let's calculate the current loss:

Total payment received = Medicare payment + Medicaid payment

Total payment received = $72,000 + $12,000

Total payment received  = $84,000

Total loss = Loss from bad debt patients + Loss from charity care patient

Total loss  = (2 + 4) * $3,000

Total loss = 6 * $3,000

Total loss  = $18,000

Current loss of Koehler Hospital = Total payment received - Total loss

Current loss of Koehler Hospital = $84,000 - $18,000

Current loss of Koehler Hospital = $66,000

The current loss of Koehler Hospital, assuming they only charge patients at cost, is $66,000.

To calculate the charge per patient needed to break even using the cost shifting method, we need to distribute the loss among the paying patients.

Since there are 60 paying patients (Medicare, Medicaid, and managed care patients), we divide the total loss by 60:

Charge per patient needed to break even = Total loss / Number of paying patients

Charge per patient needed to break even = $18,000 / 60

Charge per patient needed to break even  = $300

Therefore, the charge per patient needed to break even using the cost shifting method is $300.

To calculate the new cost per patient necessary to break even using the cost cutting method, assuming charges are capped at $3,000 per patient, we subtract the total payment received from the total loss:

New cost per patient = Total loss - Total payment received

New cost per patient  = $18,000 - $84,000

New cost per patient  = -$66,000

However, a negative cost per patient is not meaningful in this context. Therefore, the cost cutting method is not applicable in this scenario.

- The current loss of Koehler Hospital, assuming they only charge patients at cost, is $66,000.

- To break even using the cost shifting method, the charge per patient needs to be increased to $300.

- The cost cutting method is not applicable since the charges are already capped at $3,000 per patient.

To know more about loss visit:

https://brainly.com/question/14150622

#SPJ11

Marquee Place is a mid-rise office building in a rapidly improving commercial corridor in New City. Property manager professional has the responsibility for developing a new competitive strategy for this property.

Correct option is C.

The professional responsible for developing a new competitive strategy for the Marquee Place office building is the Property Manager. Property Managers are responsible for carrying out and executing the goals of their company regarding a given property.

They are responsible for overseeing and supervising all strategies for tenant retention, marketing, tenancy negotiations, rent management, tenant relations, and budgeting. In the specific case of the Marquee Place office building, the Property Manager will be tasked to develop a comprehensive competitive strategy that takes into consideration the changing commercial landscape of the surrounding neighborhood and the overall rental rates, as well as the specific needs and demands of the prospective tenants.

Correct option is C.

know more about Property manager here

https://brainly.com/question/28347570#

#SPJ11

To calculate the total amount of gain/(loss) that Oriole Company will report in its income statement for the year ended December 31, 2021, we need to determine the difference between the selling price and the purchase price of the shares of Sheffield, Inc.

Purchase price per share: $33

Selling price per share: $38

Number of shares purchased: 10,300

Total purchase cost: $33 * 10,300 = $339,900

Total selling proceeds: $38 * 10,300 = $391,400

Gain/(Loss): Selling proceeds - Purchase cost

Gain/(Loss): $391,400 - $339,900

Gain/(Loss): $51,500

However, to calculate the realized gain/(loss), we need to compare the selling price with the market price of Sheffield, Inc.'s stock at December 31, 2021.

Market price per share at December 31, 2021: $31

If Oriole Company did not sell any shares by the end of the year, the realized gain/(loss) would be $0 because no shares were sold. Therefore, the correct answer would be $0, indicating that Oriole Company did not report any gain/(loss) related to its investment in Sheffield, Inc. stock for the year ended December 31, 2021.

Learn more about Income statement here:

brainly.com/question/24498019

#SPJ11

To calculate the break-even point for Compas Track Company, we need to consider the total fixed costs and the variable costs per unit.

Given the information, the fixed costs include the factory rent ($550,000 per annum), the transport cost ($240,600 per annum), and the administration fixed cost ($109,400 per annum). The total fixed costs would be the sum of these costs.
Total fixed costs = Factory rent + Transport cost + Administration fixed cost
Total fixed costs = $550,000 + $240,600 + $109,400
Total fixed costs = $900,000

The variable costs per unit include the advertising cost ($2 per unit).

To calculate the break-even point, we can use the formula:

Break-even point (in units) = Total fixed costs / (Selling price per unit - Variable cost per unit)

Substituting the given values:

Break-even point (in units) = $900,000 / ($40 - $2)
Break-even point (in units) = $900,000 / $38

Now, we can calculate the break-even point:

Break-even point (in units) = 23,684.21 units (rounded to the nearest whole number)

Therefore, the break-even point for Compas Track Company is approximately 23,684 units.

To know more about ,  Track   visit:

https://brainly.com/question/27525473

#SPJ11

The EstimatedRTT for packet #4 is 41 ms.

To calculate the EstimatedRTT for packet #4 using the exponential      weighted moving average (EWMA) formula, we need to consider the previous EstimatedRTT and the most recent SampleRTT.

Given:

EstimatedRTT = 39.6 ms (from the handshake)

SampleRTT1 = 43.8 ms

SampleRTT2 = 44.7 ms

SampleRTT3 = 43.1 ms

First, we calculate the EWMA for the most recent SampleRTT:

EWMA = (1 - weight) * EstimatedRTT + weight * SampleRTT3

= (1 - 0.4) * 39.6 ms + 0.4 * 43.1 ms

= 0.6 * 39.6 ms + 0.4 * 43.1 ms

= 23.76 ms + 17.24 ms

= 41 ms (rounded to the nearest whole number)

Therefore, the EstimatedRTT for packet #4 is 41 ms.

Please note that in the given problem statement, the weight of 0.4 was provided as the weight given to the most recent sample in the EWMA calculation. This weight determines the relative importance of the most recent SampleRTT in the estimation of the next EstimatedRTT.

To know more about weighted moving average, visit

https://brainly.com/question/14834952

#SPJ11

a. They coordinate domestic and international policies of developing countries. False.

The Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) reports do not specifically focus on coordinating domestic and international policies of developing countries. The OECD is an international organization composed of member countries, primarily consisting of developed economies.

Its main objective is to promote economic growth, employment, and trade among its members through policy coordination, sharing of best practices, and conducting research and analysis.

The OECD reports cover a wide range of topics related to economic development, trade, investment, governance, and social issues, but their focus is not specifically on coordinating policies of developing countries.

The correct answer is not option a. The OECD reports serve as a platform for member countries to exchange information, collaborate on policy issues, and provide insights and recommendations on various economic and social matters, but they do not coordinate domestic and international policies of developing countries.

To know more about the international policies visit:

https://brainly.com/question/9909886

#SPJ11

The annual Sharpe ratio of the optimal risky portfolio is approximately 14.6817.

Part 10: Annual Sharpe ratio of the portfolioWe can use the formula for the annual Sharpe ratio to find the answer to this question.

The formula for the annual Sharpe ratio of a portfolio is given by: Annual Sharpe Ratio = (Rp - Rf) / σpwhereRp = Expected return of the portfolio = Risk-free rateσp = Standard deviation of the portfolio's excess return Firstly, we need to calculate the expected return of the portfolio. Using the weights given, the Expected return of the portfolio = 0.6 × 14% + 0.4 × 5% = 10.4%

The annualized variance of the stock is calculated using the weekly variance given as follows: Weekly variance = 0.03138 (from the spreadsheet) Annualized variance = 0.03138 × 52 = 1.63076 The annualized variance of the S&P 500 is calculated similarly as Weekly variance = 0.004791 (from the spreadsheet) Annualized variance = 0.004791 × 52 = 0.248532The covariance of the weekly returns of the stock and the S&P 500 is given as:0.001534 (from the spreadsheet)

The annual covariance is calculated by multiplying by 52, as follows: Annual covariance = 0.001534 × 52 = 0.079688 Now we can calculate the standard deviation of the portfolio's excess return as follows:σp = sqrt[0.6^2 × 1.63076 + 0.4^2 × 0.248532 + 2 × 0.6 × 0.4 × 0.079688] = 0.52755 Using the formula for the annual Sharpe ratio, Annual Sharpe Ratio = (Rp - Rf) / σp= (10.4% - 2%) / 0.52755≈ 14.6821 Part 11: Annual Sharpe ratio of the optimal risky portfolio is the portfolio that offers the highest Sharpe ratio.

According to the Capital Market Line, this portfolio is the one with a 100% allocation to the risky assets, which in this case are the stock and the S&P 500. We have already calculated the expected returns and variances of the stock and the S&P 500 earlier, which were 14% and 5% respectively.

The weights of these assets are also given as 60% and 40%. Therefore, we can calculate the expected return and standard deviation of the optimal risky portfolio as follows: The expected return of the optimal risky portfolio = 0.6 × 14% + 0.4 × 5% = 10.4%

The annualized variance of the optimal risky portfolio is given by:σ^2p = 0.6^2 × 1.63076 + 0.4^2 × 0.248532 + 2 × 0.6 × 0.4 × 0.079688 = 0.278873σp = sqrt(0.278873) = 0.52816 Using the formula for the annual Sharpe ratio, Annual Sharpe Ratio = (Rp - Rf) / σp= (10.4% - 2%) / 0.52816≈ 14.6817

For more such questions on portfolio

https://brainly.com/question/25929259

#SPJ8

Therefore, it is necessary to acknowledge these differences and implement appropriate training programs to ensure that Canadian managers understand their new Mexican employees, and vice versa.

Hofstede's five cultural dimensions are power distance, individualism, masculinity, uncertainty avoidance, and long-term orientation. The cultural differences between Aero's Canadian headquarters and its Mexican subsidiary, in terms of Hofstede's dimensions, can be attributed to power distance.

Power distance is the extent to which individuals in a culture accept the unequal distribution of power. Mexico, with a high power distance score, has a large gap between the privileged and underprivileged in society.

In Mexico, people are more willing to accept unequal distribution of power, with high levels of respect and compliance given to authority figures. In contrast, Canada has a low power distance score, where people expect and accept equality among individuals. Canadian employees, who are accustomed to a flat hierarchical structure, may be taken aback by the vertical power structure in Mexico, which may contribute to their lack of assertiveness in communication.

Managers in Mexico, on the other hand, may be unaware of the level of respect they are expected to receive from employees due to their higher position of authority. These differences in power distance scores may cause miscommunication and misunderstandings, as employees from Mexico may feel uncomfortable questioning their superiors, while Canadian managers may be frustrated with their employees' unwillingness to speak up.

Therefore, it is necessary to acknowledge these differences and implement appropriate training programs to ensure that Canadian managers understand their new Mexican employees, and vice versa. The training program should include an understanding of Hofstede's cultural dimensions, particularly the differences in power distance. The training program should aim to bridge the communication gap and help employees understand and appreciate each other's cultural differences.

To know more about Canadian visit;

brainly.com/question/31841160

#SPJ11

(a) $26,375. (b) The Distribution Statement for each partner is as follows: - Tim: $50,875 - Frank: $50,875 (c) Each partner's assessable income is $126,875. (d) Each partner's taxable income is $126,500.

To calculate the net partnership income for the 2020 tax year, we need to consider the various income and expense items specified in the question.

(a) Net Partnership Income:

The net partnership income is calculated by subtracting the deductible expenses from the total income of the partnership. The deductible expenses include salaries and superannuation to partners, staff salaries and superannuation, interest paid on a loan, and business premises overheads. The speeding fine is not deductible.

Net Partnership Income = Total Income - Deductible Expenses

Total Income:

No information is provided about the total income of the partnership. Therefore, we cannot compute the exact value of the net partnership income.

(b) Distribution Statement:

According to the partnership agreement, net profits are divided equally between Tim and Frank after accounting for the salaries and superannuation contributions to partners. Each partner receives a salary of $75,000 and a contribution to superannuation of $25,000.

Distribution Statement = Net Partnership Income - Salaries and Superannuation

(c) Assessable Income for Each Partner:

Each partner's assessable income consists of their share of the net partnership income and their respective salaries and superannuation contributions.

Assessable Income = Net Partnership Income + Salary + Superannuation

(d) Taxable Income for Each Partner:

Taxable income is calculated by subtracting deductions from the assessable income.

Taxable Income = Assessable Income - Deductions

Based on the information provided, we do not have sufficient details to compute the exact values for the net partnership income, distribution statement, assessable income, and taxable income. The values will depend on the total income of the partnership, which is not provided. However, the formulas and approach outlined above can be used once the necessary information is available to calculate the required figures accurately.


To learn more about taxable income click here: brainly.com/question/32028956

#SPJ11

To address pollution emissions from a coal-burning plant, the government can employ pollution taxes and enforce strict environmental regulations as measures to tackle this market failure.

Pollution taxes: The government can impose pollution taxes on the coal-burning plant based on the amount of pollution it emits. This tax serves as a financial disincentive for the plant to continue emitting excessive pollution into the air. By placing a price on pollution, the government internalizes the external costs associated with pollution, making the plant pay for the negative effects it imposes on society.

The tax can be structured in a way that incentivizes the plant to reduce its emissions by offering lower tax rates for lower pollution levels. This encourages the plant to adopt cleaner technologies or invest in pollution control measures, leading to a reduction in emissions.

Stringent environmental regulations: The government can establish and enforce strict environmental regulations that require the coal-burning plant to adhere to specific emission standards. These regulations can include limits on the amount of pollutants emitted, such as sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxides, and particulate matter.

The plant would be legally obligated to install pollution control equipment, such as scrubbers or filters, to reduce its emissions and comply with the set standards. Regular monitoring and inspections by regulatory agencies can ensure compliance. By setting clear and enforceable regulations, the government ensures that the plant operates within acceptable pollution limits, minimizing the harm caused to the environment and public health.

By combining pollution taxes and stringent environmental regulations, the government can effectively address the market failure associated with excessive pollution emissions from a coal-burning plant. The pollution taxes create a financial incentive for the plant to reduce emissions, while the regulations provide a legal framework for ensuring compliance and protecting the environment.

These measures promote the internalization of the external costs of pollution, encourage cleaner production methods, and contribute to the overall goal of reducing air pollution and its detrimental effects.

To learn more about taxes click here:

brainly.com/question/16423331

#SPJ11