Please help me with this problem

In order to determine which person's sampling distribution closely approximates the population distribution, we need to compare the number of students in each sample to the total population of students. Without knowing the size of the population or the characteristics of the population, it's difficult to make an exact determination.

However, we can make some generalizations based on the table.

If the number of students in each sample is relatively small compared to the total population of students, then none of the individuals' sampling distributions are likely to closely approximate the population distribution. This is because small sample sizes are more likely to produce results that deviate from the true population distribution.

On the other hand, if the number of students in each sample is relatively large compared to the total population of students, then it's more likely that one of the individuals' sampling distributions will closely approximate the population distribution.

person's sampling distribution was most likely to closely approximate the population distribution, Based on the information given in the table, it appears that Mark's sampling distribution has the largest sample sizes, which makes it more likely that his sampling distribution will closely approximate the population distribution. However, without additional information about the size and characteristics of the population, we can't say for sure which person's sampling distribution is the best approximation of the population distribution.

learn more about population distribution here: brainly.com/question/13403673

#SPJ11

The probability that both people own a dog is 0.1225, written as a decimal using the appropriate rounding rule. To solve this problem, we can use the multiplication rule of probability which states that the probability of two independent events occurring together is the product of their individual probabilities.

So, the probability of the first person owning a dog is 0.35, and the probability of the second person owning a dog (assuming independence) is also 0.35.  Therefore, the probability that both people own a dog is 0.35 x 0.35 = 0.1225.
To write this as a decimal using appropriate rounding rule, we can round to two decimal places, giving us 0.12 as our final answer. The probability that both people own a dog, we will use the concept of random, probability, and decimal.
1. Convert the percentage of people owning dogs to a decimal: 35% = 0.35
2. Since the two people are picked at random and we assume independence, we can multiply the probabilities: 0.35 * 0.35
3. Calculate the result: 0.35 * 0.35 = 0.1225

Learn more about independent events here: brainly.com/question/30905572

#SPJ11

To find the length of the wire, we need to use the formula: Length of arc = (central angle / 360) x 2πr Plugging in the given values, we get:

length of arc = (105/360) x 2π(14.8)
length of arc = (0.2917) x (2 x 3.14 x 14.8)
length of arc = 25.9 cm (rounded to tenths)

Therefore, the length of the wire needed to form the arc of the circle is 25.9 cm.

To find the length of the wire, we will use the formula for the arc length of a circle:

Arc length = (Central angle / 360°) × 2π × Radius

1. First, plug in the given values for the central angle (105°) and the radius (14.8 cm):

Arc length = (105° / 360°) × 2π × 14.8 cm

2. Divide 105 by 360:

0.2917 = 105° / 360°

3. Multiply the result by 2π:

0.2917 × 2π = 1.8326π

4. Finally, multiply the result by the radius (14.8 cm):

Arc length = 1.8326π × 14.8 cm ≈ 85.5 cm (rounded to tenths)

So, the length of the wire that forms the arc is approximately 85.5 cm.

To know more about the length of a circle:- https://brainly.com/question/28109262

#SPJ11

Answer: To fill the whole bucket, it will take 64 seconds so the remaining time is 40 seconds

Step-by-step explanation: As we are given 3/8 th part of the bucket is filled in 24 seconds. So by simply applying the unitary method we can say -

3/8 th part -----> 24 seconds

To fill the whole bucket multiply both sides by 8/3 in order to make the 1 unit of the bucket on the L.H.S, we get

1 bucket ----> 64 seconds.

The remaining times as it already passes 24 seconds and 3/8 th part of the bucket is filled, 64-24 seconds i.e 40 seconds is remaining in which bucket is full.

to get more understanding about unitary method:

https://brainly.in/question/3329858

To rewrite the linear system as a matrix equation, we can let y = [y1, y2, y3] and A be the coefficient matrix:

y' = Ay
where
A = [1 1 2; 1 0 1; 2 1 3]

To compute the eigenvalues of A, we can use the formula:
det(A - λI) = 0
where det represents the determinant and I is the identity matrix.

So, we have:
|1-λ 1 2|     |1 1-λ 2|     |1 1 1-λ|
|1 0-λ 1|  =  |1 0 1|  =  |1-λ 0 1|
|2 1 3-λ|     |2 1 3|     |2 1 3-λ|

Expanding the determinants, we get:
(1-λ)[(0-λ)(3-λ)-1]-1[(1)(3-λ)-2(1)]+2[(1)(1)-2(1-λ)]
= (λ-3)(λ-1)(λ-2) = 0

Therefore, the eigenvalues of A are 3, 1, and 2.

Refer for more,

https://brainly.com/question/13987127#

#SPJ11

The Solution of the equation is x = 27/5

The equation given is x - 2/5 = 5. This equation is in the form of a linear equation, which means it can be solved for x using algebraic methods.

To solve the equation, we need to isolate the variable, x, on one side of the equation. We can do this by adding 2/5 to both sides of the equation, which gives:

x - 2/5 + 2/5 = 5 + 2/5

Simplifying the left-hand side of the equation, we get:

x = 5 + 2/5

Combining the terms on the right-hand side, we get:

x = 5 2/5

Therefore, the solution to the equation x - 2/5 = 5 is x = 5 2/5 or x = 27/5.

To know more about equation here

https://brainly.com/question/10413253

#SPJ1

Complete Question :

Solve the equation x - 2/5 = 5

Using the given terms, we'll apply Stokes' theorem to find the flux of the vector field F across the surface S.

Stokes' theorem states that the flux of the curl of a vector field F across a surface S is equal to the circulation of F around the boundary of S. Mathematically, it's expressed as:

∮_C F·dr = ∬_S curl(F)·dS

Given the vector field F = li + 3j + 1k, we first need to find the curl of F. Curl(F) is given by the determinant of the following matrix:

| i  j  k  |
| ∂/∂x  ∂/∂y  ∂/∂z |
| l  3  1 |

Curl(F) = i(∂(1)/∂y - ∂(3)/∂z) - j(∂(1)/∂x - ∂(l)/∂z) + k(∂(3)/∂x - ∂(l)/∂y)
Curl(F) = -j(0 - 0) + k(0 - 0) = 0

Since the curl of F is 0, the flux of the vector field F across the surface S is also 0. Therefore, by using Stokes' theorem, we have found that the flux of the vector field F across the surface S in the first octant is 0.

To learn more about vector visit;

brainly.com/question/29740341

#SPJ11

For a line plot of data values of a data set present in above figure, the outlier is one of data set value which is equals to the 0.1. So, option(a) is right one.

Outlier is a data value that differ significantly from other values in the dataset. That is, outliers are values that deviate significantly from the mean. In general, outliers affect the mean, but not the median or mode. Therefore, the effect of outliers on the mean is significant. We have a line plot of data set present in above figure. We have to determine the data value would be considered the outlier. From the above discussion about outliers, we can say that outlier is a data value far beyond the meaning of statistical methods. So, after watching the above graph carefully, the data value 0.1 is far away from other data values and mean of values. So, outlier is 0.1.

For more information about outlier, visit :

https://brainly.com/question/3631910

#SPJ4

Complete question:

The above figure complete the question.

Which data value would be considered the outlier? Enter your answer in the box.

a) 0. 1

b) 0. 2

c) 0. 3

d) 0. 4

e) 0. 5

f) 0. 6

g) 0. 7

The Kermack and McKendrick model of an epidemic proposes that the population can be divided into three classes: healthy, sick, and dead. The total population remains constant in size, except for deaths due to the epidemic. The model is kxy, where k and l are positive constants. The equations are based on the assumptions that healthy people get sick at a rate proportional to the product of x and y, and sick people die at a constant rate l.

The given model consists of three variables: x(t), y(t), and z(t), representing the number of healthy, sick, and dead people, respectively, in a population. The model has two assumptions:

1. Healthy people get sick at a rate proportional to the product of x and y (kxy).
2. Sick people die at a constant rate l.

We are given the following system of equations:

dx/dt = -kxy
dy/dt = kxy - ly
dz/dt = ly

Now, our goal is to reduce this third-order system to a first-order system that can be analyzed by our methods.

First, we notice that the total population N is constant except for deaths due to the epidemic, so we have:

N = x(t) + y(t) + z(t)

Since the total population remains constant (ignoring deaths due to the epidemic), we have:

dN/dt = dx/dt + dy/dt + dz/dt = 0

Substituting the given equations into the equation above, we get:

(-kxy) + (kxy - ly) + ly = 0

Notice that the terms involving kxy and ly cancel each other out. As a result, the system of equations is already reduced to a first-order system:

dx/dt = -kxy
dy/dt = kxy - ly

Now you can analyze this first-order system using the appropriate methods for first-order differential equations.

Learn more about :

first-order system : brainly.com/question/13260151

#SPJ11

The given equation is a curve in the Cartesian plane. Therefore, the  exact length of the curve [tex]y^2= 4(x+5)^3 , 0 \leq x \leq 3, y > 0[/tex]  is  [tex]2(3 \sqrt{3} - \sqrt{6} )[/tex] units

To find its length, we can use the formula for the arc length of a curve in terms of its parameterization.

First, we need to rewrite the equation in terms of a parameterization. Let's use x as the parameter, so we have [tex]y = 2\sqrt{(x+5)^3}[/tex]. Then, taking the derivative of y with respect to x, we get:

dy/dx = √(x+5)

Using this, we can calculate the arc length of the curve as:

[tex]L = \int_0^3 \sqrt{(1 + (dy/dx)^2) dx}[/tex]

Substituting dy/dx, we get:

[tex]L = \int_0^3 \sqrt{(1 + x+5) dx}[/tex]

Simplifying the inside of the square root, we get:

[tex]L = \int_0^3 \sqrt{(x+6) dx}[/tex]

Making the substitution u = x+6, we get:

[tex]L = \int_6^9 \sqrt{u \;du}[/tex]

Using the power rule of integration, we get:

[tex]L = (2/3)u^{(3/2)} |_6^9[/tex]

[tex]L = (2/3)(9\sqrt{9} - 6\sqrt{6} )[/tex]

[tex]L = 2(3\sqrt{3} - \sqrt{6})[/tex]

Therefore, the exact length of the curve is [tex]2(3 \sqrt{3} - \sqrt{6} )[/tex] units

To know more about equation refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/31190601#

#SPJ11

No, Noah's arithmetic is not correct.

Lin is correct that when you add or multiply two complex numbers, the result can always be written in the form a + bi.

In the first example, (7+2)+(3-2), we can simplify by adding the real and imaginary parts separately: (7+3)+(2-2) = 10 + 0i, which can be written in the form a + bi.

In the second example, (2+2)(2+2), we can expand using FOIL: 2(2) + 2(2i) + 2i(2) + 2i(2i) = 4 + 4i + 4i - 4 = 8i, which can also be written in the form a + bi.

Therefore, Noah's exceptions are not valid, and the statement made by Lin is true.

To learn more about arithmetic here:

https://brainly.com/question/4626313

#SPJ1

The radius of convergence (r) is 1.

To find the radius of convergence of the power series using the ratio test, we first need to identify the general term of the series.

The given power series is:

x + 4x^2 + 9x^3 + 16x^4 + 25x^5 + ...

The general term is an = n^2 * x^n.

Now, apply the ratio test:

lim (n→∞) |(a(n+1))/an|

= lim (n→∞) |((n+1)^2 * x^(n+1))/(n^2 * x^n)|

= lim (n→∞) |(n^2 + 2n + 1)x / n^2|

For the ratio test, the series converges if this limit is less than 1:

|(n^2 + 2n + 1)x / n^2| < 1

Taking the limit as n approaches infinity, we get:

|x| < 1

Therefore, the radius of convergence (r) is 1.

To learn more about radius visit;

brainly.com/question/13449316

#SPJ11

The vertical asymptote is x = -4 and the horizontal asymptote of the function is y = 2.

To find the vertical asymptote of the function f(x) = 2x ÷ (x+4), we need to look for any value of x that makes the denominator equal to zero. In this case, we have: x + 4 = 0

x = -4

Therefore, the vertical asymptote is x = -4.

f(x) = (2x ÷ x) ÷ (x ÷ x + 4 ÷ x)

f(x) = 2 ÷ (1 + 4/x)

As x becomes very large, the term 4/x becomes very small and can be neglected.

Therefore, as x → ∞, f(x) → 2/1 = 2.

Similarly, as x becomes very small (i.e., negative), the term 4/x becomes very large and can be neglected. Therefore, as

x → -∞, f(x) → 2/1 = 2.

To learn more about vertical follow the link:

https://brainly.com/question/27029296

#SPJ1

The complete question is:

Determine the equations of the vertical and horizontal asymptotes, if any, for f(x) = 2x / x + 4.

The currency exchange , If we Rounded it up to  2 decimal places , it will be  $313.95.

Firstly,  we will convert the amount given  in pounds to euros:

sin 1 pounds = 1.12 euro

And €1 is =$1.22

Therefore,

£230 x €1.12 divide by £1 = €257.60

Then, let convert the amount in euros  to dollars:

€257.60 x $1.22 divided €1 = $313.95

So, we can say  Aishah will  get $313.95 when  she converts  230 pounds  into dollars. If we Rounded it up to  2 decimal places , it will be  $313.95.

Learn more about currency exchange below.

https://brainly.com/question/2202418

#SPJ1

The value 6 is a counterexample to this conditional statement. So, correct option is C.

The statement "If a number is divisible by three, then it is odd" is a conditional statement that can be written in the form of "If p, then q", where p represents "a number is divisible by three" and q represents "it is odd". To disprove a conditional statement, we need a counterexample where p is true and q is false.

Option C) 6 is a counterexample to this conditional statement since it is divisible by three but it is not odd. Therefore, option C) is the correct answer.

Option A) 1 is not a counterexample as it is not divisible by three and is odd.

Option B) 3 is true for both p and q, and is not a counterexample.

Option D) 9 is not a counterexample as it is divisible by three and is odd.

So, correct option is C.

To learn more about counterexample click on,

https://brainly.com/question/30845664

#SPJ1

the correct option is:

b. No horizontal asymptote. Vertical asymptotes \(x = 3\) and \(x = -2\)

To find the asymptotes of the function \(f(x) = \frac{7x^2+x+3}{(x-3)(x+2)}\), we can analyze the behavior of the function as \(x\) approaches certain values.

1. Vertical Asymptotes:

Vertical asymptotes occur when the denominator of the function approaches zero, but the numerator does not. So, set the denominator equal to zero and solve for \(x\):

\(x - 3 = 0\) \(\implies x = 3\)

\(x + 2 = 0\) \(\implies x = -2\)

Therefore, there are vertical asymptotes at \(x = 3\) and \(x = -2\).

2. Horizontal Asymptote:

To determine the horizontal asymptote, we examine the degrees of the numerator and denominator. Since the degree of the numerator (2) is equal to the degree of the denominator (2), we need to compare the leading coefficients of both.

The leading coefficient of the numerator is 7, and the leading coefficient of the denominator is 1. Thus, there is a horizontal asymptote at \(y = \frac{7}{1} = 7\).

3. Slant Asymptote:

To determine if there is a slant asymptote, we divide the numerator by the denominator using polynomial long division or synthetic division:

```

    7x + 22

---------------

(x - 3)(x + 2) | 7x^2 +  x + 3

    -7x^2 - 14x

    ------------

            15x + 3

            -15x - 30

            ------------

                 33

```

The quotient is \(7x + 22\) with a remainder of 33. Since the remainder is not zero, there is no slant asymptote.

To know more about asymptotes refer here

https://brainly.com/question/32038756#

#SPJ11

Larry, who is 32 years old, is planning to invest $250 at the beginning of each month in an IRA that earns 3.5% interest compounded monthly. After 26 years, he will have around $177,075 in his account. Therefore, the correct answer is $177,075 and option is A).

We can solve this problem using the formula for the future value of an annuity

[tex]FV = Pmt[(1 + r/n)^{nt} - 1] / (r/n)[/tex]

where FV is the future value, Pmt is the payment made each period, r is the annual interest rate, n is the number of compounding periods per year, and t is the number of years.

In this case, Larry is going to invest $250 at the beginning of each month, so his monthly payment (Pmt) is $250. The annual interest rate (r) is 3.5%, and it is compounded monthly (n=12). Larry wants to retire in 26 years (58 - 32 = 26), so the number of years (t) is 26.

Substituting these values into the formula, we get

FV = $250 x [(1 + 0.035/12)¹²ˣ²⁶ - 1] / (0.035/12)

FV = $177,075.08

Therefore, Larry will have approximately $177,075 in his IRA when he retires, rounded to the nearest dollar. The closest option provided is $177,075, so the correct answer is A) $177,075.

To know more about interest rate:

https://brainly.com/question/15089941

#SPJ1

The property of vectors that is incorrect is "Oa· (b + c) = a · b + a.c = (a + b ) + c = a +(b + c)". The correct property is "Oa· (b + c) = Oa·b + Oa·c".

The incorrect property of vectors among the given options is:

Oa·b = axb

This property is incorrect because the dot product (a·b) and cross product (axb) of two vectors are different operations with different results. The dot product is a scalar value, while the cross product is another vector that is orthogonal to the given vectors. The correct properties of vectors in your question are:

1. a x b = -b x a (cross product)
2. a · (b + c) = a · b + a · c (dot product distributive property)
3. (a + b) + c = a + (b + c) (vector addition associativity)

to learn more about distributive property click here:

brainly.com/question/13818728

#SPJ11

Using linear approximation, we can approximate [tex]3.6^3[/tex] as approximately 28.8.

To use linear approximation to approximate [tex]3.6^3[/tex], we first find the equation of the tangent line to f(x) = [tex]x^3[/tex] at a = 4.

The slope of the tangent line at a point x = a is given by the derivative f'(a), so in this case:

f'(x) = [tex]3x^2[/tex]

f'(4) = 48

So the slope of the tangent line at x = 4 is m = f'(4) = 48.

The equation of the tangent line at x = 4 can be written in point-slope form as:

y - f(4) = m(x - 4)

We substitute f(4) = [tex]4^3[/tex] = 64 and m = 48, and simplify:

y - 64 = 48(x - 4)

y = 48x - 160

This is the equation of the tangent line to f(x) = [tex]x^3[/tex] at x = 4, in slope-intercept form. To approximate [tex]3.6^3[/tex] using this tangent line, we plug in x = 3.6:

y ≈ 48(3.6) - 160

y ≈ 28.8

To know more about linear approximation, refer to the link below:

https://brainly.com/question/1621850#

#SPJ11

The surface area of the composite figure is 416 in².

We have,

From the figure,

We have 10 surfaces.

Now,

There are 4 pairs of surfaces and 2 different surfaces.

1 pair is in square shape.

3 pairs in a rectangle shape.

Now,

Square shape surface area.

= 3² + 3²

= 9 + 9

= 18 in²

Rectangular surface area.

= (6 x 8) + (6 x 8) + (6 x 11) + (6 x 11) + (3 x 11) + (3 x 11)

= 56 + 56 + 66 + 66 + 33 + 33

= 310 in²

And,

Two different Surfaces area.

Both are in rectangular shape.

= (11 x 3) + (11 x (8 - 3))

= 33 + (11 x 5)

= 33 + 55

= 88 in²

Thus,

The surface area of the composite figure.

= 18 + 310 + 88

= 416 in²

Thus,

The surface area of the composite figure is 416 in².

Learn more about the surface area here:

https://brainly.com/question/31663437

#SPJ1

f is increasing on the interval (0,6). To find the interval(s) on which f is increasing, we need to find the derivative of f and determine where it is positive.

f'(x) = 6x^5e^-x - x^6e^-x = x^5e^-x(6-x)
Now, we need to determine when f'(x) > 0.
x^5e^-x(6-x) > 0
x^5 is always positive, so we just need to consider e^-x(6-x).
When x < 0, e^-x is positive and (6-x) is negative, so the product is negative.
When 0 < x < 6, both e^-x and (6-x) are positive, so the product is positive.
When x > 6, e^-x is very small and (6-x) is negative, so the product is negative.
Therefore, f is increasing on the interval (0,6).

Learn more about derivatives here: brainly.com/question/23847661

#SPJ11

If a is a subset of b, then the cardinality of a (|a|) is less than or equal to the cardinality of b (|b|).

By definition, if a is a subset of b, it means that every element in a is also an element of b. In other words, a is contained within b. The cardinality of a set refers to the number of elements it contains. Therefore, if a is a subset of b, it implies that the number of elements in a (|a|) cannot exceed the number of elements in b (|b|). In fact, |a| could be equal to |b| if a and b have the same number of elements. Hence, if a ⊂ b, it follows that |a| ≤ |b|.

To show that if a and b are sets and a ⊂ b, then |a| ≤ |b|, we need to show that there exists an injective function from a to b.

Let f(a) = a, for all a in set a. Since a is a subset of b, every element in a is also an element in b. Therefore, f(a) is a function from a to b.

To show that f is injective, suppose that f(a) = f(a'). Then, by the definition of f, we have a = a'. Therefore, f is injective.

Since we have found an injective function from a to b, by the definition of cardinality, we have |a| ≤ |b|.

Learn more about Cardinality

brainly.com/question/29093097

#SPJ11

Answer:

4

Step-by-step explanation:

If BD bisects <ABC, then that means it also bisects AC.

If a line is bisecting another line, then both parts are equal.  So, x has to be equal to 4.

Hope this helps :)

Answer: 18x+21

Step-by-step explanation: The function that shows the cost of the shirts if she uses the coupon is:

f(x) = 18x - 21

Explanation:

The cost for each shirt is $18, and Mrs. Chambers is buying x number of shirts. So the cost of all the shirts would be 18x.

The design fee is $26, but she has a coupon for $5 off. So the new design fee would be 26 - 5 = $21.

Therefore, the total cost of the shirts and the design fee with the coupon would be 18x + 21, which is the same as f(x) = 18x - 21.

Using Lagrange multipliers method, we have one maximum value of 3√3 and one minimum value of -3√3.

To use the Lagrange multipliers method to find the extreme values of the function f(x,y)=xy subject to the constraint [tex]36x^2 + y^2 = 72[/tex], we set up the following equation:

L(x, y, λ) = f(x, y) - λ(g(x, y)) = xy - λ[tex](36x^2 + y^2 - 72)[/tex]

where λ is the Lagrange multiplier.

Next, we take the partial derivatives of L with respect to x, y, and λ, and set them equal to zero to find the critical points:

∂L/∂x = y - 72λx = 0

∂L/∂y = x - 2λy = 0

∂L/∂λ = [tex]36x^2 + y^2 - 72[/tex] = 0

Solving for x and y in terms of λ from the first two equations gives:

x = 2λy

y = 72λx

Substituting these into the third equation and simplifying gives:

[tex]36(2 \lambda y)^2 + y^2 - 72[/tex] = 0

Solving for y gives:

y = ±2√3

Substituting this value of y back into the equations for x in terms of λ gives:

x = ±√3

So the critical points are (±√3, ±2√3).

To determine whether these critical points correspond to maximum or minimum values of f(x,y), we evaluate the function at each critical point:

f(√3, 2√3) = 3√3

f(√3, -2√3) = -3√3

f(-√3, 2√3) = -3√3

f(-√3, -2√3) = 3√3

Thus, we have one maximum value of 3√3 and one minimum value of -3√3.

To know more about Lagrange multipliers method, refer to the link below:

https://brainly.com/question/9458658#

#SPJ11

The coordinates after the rotation are A' = (-2, 2), B' = (3, -3) and C' = (-5, -2)

Given that, graph of triangle ABC with vertices at (-2, -2), (3, 3), (2, -5)

We need to determine the coordinates of triangle A′B′C′ when triangle ABC is rotated 90° clockwise.

So, we know that rule of rotation 90° clockwise = (x, y) becomes (y, -x)

Therefore,

A' = (-2, 2)

B' = (3, -3)

C' = (-5, -2)

Hence, the graph is attached.

Learn more about rotations, click;

https://brainly.com/question/1571997

#SPJ1

Answer:

The coordinates after the rotation are A' = (-2, 2), B' = (3, -3) and C' = (-5, -2)

Step-by-step explanation:

Since matrix A is a 3x7 matrix and it has three pivot columns, it means that there are three leading ones in the row-reduced echelon form of A, which implies that the row-reduced echelon form of A has three nonzero rows. Thus, the rank of matrix A is 3.

(a) Col A- R3: The column space of A is spanned by the columns containing the pivot entries in the row-reduced echelon form of A.

Since there are three pivot columns, it means that the column space of A has dimension 3. Therefore, Col A- R3 = {0}, which means that the only linear combination of the columns of A that gives the zero vector is the trivial one.

(b) Nul A- R42: The null space of A is t solutions to the homogeneous equation Ax = 0. Since A has rank 3, the nullity of A is 7 - 3 = 4.

It follows that Nul A- R42 is the set of all solutions to the homogeneous equation Ax = 0 that can be written as a linear combination of four linearly independent vectors. Since the nullity of A is 4, it means that Nul A- R42 has dimension 4.

To know more about matrix refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/29132693

#SPJ11

When binary 1100 and binary 1110 are multiplied the product in hexadecimal is A8.

To convert binary numbers to decimal numbers:

We are supposed to add the product of the face value of the number and 2 raised to the power of the place value of the number.

Therefore, the binary number 1100 can be converted to the number:

binary number 1100 = 1 * [tex]2^3[/tex] + 1 * [tex]2^2[/tex] + 0 * [tex]2^1[/tex] + 0 * [tex]2^0[/tex]

= 8 + 4 + 0 + 0 = 12

binary number 1110 = 1 * [tex]2^3[/tex] + 1 * [tex]2^2[/tex] + 1 * [tex]2^1[/tex] + 0 * [tex]2^0[/tex]

= 8 + 4 + 2 + 0 = 14

Product = 12 * 14

= 168

To convert the decimal number into a hexadecimal number:

We divide the number by 16 until we reach 0 as the quotient. We mention the remainder on the side. From the below to above, we mention the remainder as the answer.

Decimal 168 = A8 hexadecimal.

Learn more about Binary:

https://brainly.com/question/31662989

#SPJ4