please help with full explanation!! thank you!! :)

The correct match of each dilation to its function is: j(x) = (1/2x)^2: vertical stretch, k(x) = 2x²: vertical compression, h(x) = (2x)²: horizontal compression, and g(x) = x²: no dilation, it is the parent function.

Each of the given functions is a dilation of the parent function f(x) = x^2, which means that they are obtained by stretching or compressing the graph of the parent function either vertically or horizontally.

- j(x) = (1/2x)^2: This function is a vertical stretch of the parent function, because the constant factor of 1/2 in front of the x causes the function to be stretched vertically by a factor of 2.

- k(x) = 2x²: This function is a vertical compression of the parent function, because the constant factor of 2 in front of the x^2 causes the function to be compressed vertically by a factor of 1/2.

- h(x) = (2x)²: This function is a horizontal compression of the parent function, because the constant factor of 2 inside the x^2 causes the function to be compressed horizontally by a factor of 1/2.

- g(x) = x²: This is the parent function, and it is not dilated in any way. Its graph is a parabola that opens upwards and has a vertex at the origin.

Thus, this is the correct match for the given scenario.

For more details regarding dilation, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/13176891

#SPJ1

The volume of the composite figure is solved to be

The volume of the composite figure is calculated by dividing the figure into simpler figure and solve each volume. The volumes calculated is the added to give the volume of the composite figure

formula for volume = length x width x depth

First simpler part

volume = 10.5 ft x 3 ft x 6 ft

volume = 189 cubic ft

second simpler figure

volume = (9 - 3) ft x 4 1/2 ft x 6 ft

volume = 162 cubic ft

volume of the composite figure

= 189 + 162

= 351 cubic ft

Learn more about volume of composite figure at

https://brainly.com/question/12693294

#SPJ1

Using the given ratio we can see that there are 19 used cars.

We know that the dealership reported that they have 5 new cars for every 1 used car on the lot, so we need to use that ratio.

5/6 of the cars are new.

1/6 of the cars are used.

The total number is 114, then the number of used cars is:

(1/6)*114 = 19

There are 19 used cars.

Learn more about ratios at:

https://brainly.com/question/2328454

#SPJ1

There is approximately a 3.84% chance that a randomly selected adult has an IQ greater than 144.4.

To find the probability that a randomly selected adult has an IQ greater than 144.4, assuming their scores are normally distributed with a mean of 102.7 and a standard deviation of 23.5, we will use the z-score formula.

First, calculate the z-score:
z = (X - μ) / σ
where X is the IQ score (144.4), μ is the mean (102.7), and σ is the standard deviation (23.5).

z = (144.4 - 102.7) / 23.5
z ≈ 1.77

Now, use a z-table to find the probability corresponding to this z-score. The z-table value for a z-score of 1.77 is approximately 0.9616. Since we want the probability of an IQ greater than 144.4, we will find the area to the right of this z-score.

Probability = 1 - 0.9616 = 0.0384

Know more about probability here:

https://brainly.com/question/30034780

#SPJ11

For the two sample tests or Clin with m = 12 and n = 15.5, the number of degrees of freedom is (m + n - 2) which is (12 + 15.5 - 2) = 25.5. Since degrees of freedom must be a whole number, we round down to 25.
For the two sample tests or Clin with a sample size of -40.52 - 5,0 X (6), we need more information to determine the degrees of freedom.

In order to determine the number of degrees of freedom for a two-sample t-test, you need to use the following formula:

Degrees of freedom (df) = (m - 1) + (n - 1)

where m and n are the sample sizes of the two groups being compared.

In the given question, there seem to be some errors in the values provided. However, let me explain the steps using the available values:

1. m = 12 (assuming this is the sample size of the first group)
2. n = 15.5 (assuming this is the sample size of the second group, but sample sizes should be whole numbers, so it should be rounded down to 15)
3. Apply the formula:

Degrees of freedom (df) = (12 - 1) + (15 - 1)

4. Calculate the degrees of freedom:

Degrees of freedom (df) = 11 + 14 = 25

So, the number of degrees of freedom for the two-sample test in this situation is 25.

Learn more about degrees of freedom:

brainly.com/question/31424137

#SPJ11

The coordinate system with x-coordinates between -180 and 180 is likely to be the geographic coordinate system, specifically longitude values. This system represents positions on the Earth's surface using two angles: longitude (x-coordinates) and latitude (y-coordinates).

Longitude values range from -180 degrees (180 degrees West) to 180 degrees (180 degrees East) along the Earth's equator. Latitude values, on the other hand, range from -90 degrees (90 degrees South) to 90 degrees (90 degrees North). The origin (0, 0) of this coordinate system is the intersection of the Prime Meridian (Greenwich Meridian) and the Equator.

The units for these coordinates are typically expressed in decimal degrees (DD). These values can be converted into other units such as degrees-minutes-seconds (DMS) or radians, depending on the application or preference. When working with geographic coordinate systems, it is essential to consider the Earth's curvature and potential distortions when calculating distances or areas.

In summary, if a data set has x-coordinates between -180 and 180, the coordinate system is most likely the geographic coordinate system, representing longitude values. The coordinates are typically expressed in decimal degrees, and their positions relate to the Earth's surface.

Learn more about x-coordinates here:

https://brainly.com/question/16634867

#SPJ11

The equations can be solved as shown below.

a) We have that;

( x+2 ) ( 10-x ) = 0

10x - x^2 + 20 - 2x = 0

x^2 + 2x - 10x - 20 = 0

x^2 -8x - 20 = 0

x = 10 or - 2

b) 7x + 15 = 6x + 3

7x - 6x = 3 - 15

x = - 12

c) 5x ( 3x + 5 ) = 0

15x^2 + 25x = 0

x = 0 or -5/3

d) (2x-1) ² = 0

(2x - 1) (2x - 1)

4x^2 - 2x - 2x + 1 =0

4x^2 - 4x + 1 = 0

x = 1/2(twice)

e) 4x² +13 = 14

4x² + 13 -14 = 0

4x² - 1 = 0

x = ±1/2

f) ( x-9 )² =16

(x - 9) (x - 9) = 16

x^2 - 9x - 9x + 81 = 16

x^2 - 18x +81 - 16 = 0

x^2 - 18x + 65 = 0

x = 13 or x = 5

These are the solutions of the equations.

Learn more about equations;https://brainly.com/question/29657983

#SPJ1

Answer:

243π

Step-by-step explanation:

Area of the entire circle = πr² = π18² = 324π

Area of sector = (90/360)π(18)² = 81π

Shaded area = 324π - 81π = 243π

[tex]\blue{\boxed{\bold{\mathbb{SOLUTION}}}}[/tex]

Area of the biggest circle:

[tex]\pi r^{2}=\pi \times 6^{2}=\pi \times 36 \ cm^2[/tex].

Area of the rectangle:

[tex]4 \times (2+2+2+2) = 4 \times 8 = 32 \ cm^2[/tex].

Area of the 6 semicircles:

[tex]6 \times \dfrac{1}{2} \times \pi \times r^2 = 3 \times \pi \times 2^2 = \pi \times 12 \ cm^2.[/tex]

Total shaded area:

Biggest circle area - rectangle area - 6 semicircles area

[tex]= \pi \times 36 - 32 - \pi \times 12\\= \pi \times (36-12) - 32\\= \pi \times 24 - 32\\= 3.14 \times 24 - 32\\= 75.36 - 32\\= \boxed{43.36 \ cm^2}[/tex]

Therefore, the shaded part area is [tex]43.36 \ cm^2[/tex].

[tex]\aqua{\boxed{\mathfrak{Thank \: You}}}\\\aqua{\boxed{\bold{answered \: by: \: akbarsdtazm}}}[/tex]

To determine the volume of the box, we need to find the length, width, and height of the box. We can do this by subtracting twice the length of the square cutouts from the original length, twice the width of the square cutouts from the original width, and the height will be the length of the square cutouts.

Let's assume that the side length of the square cutouts is x. Then the length of the box is (24 - 2x), the width of the box is (20 - 2x), and the height of the box is x. Thus, the volume of the box can be expressed as:

V(x) = (24 - 2x) * (20 - 2x) * x

To simplify this expression, we can expand it using the distributive property and then combine like terms:

V(x) = 4x^3 - 88x^2 + 480x

The approximate domain for V(x) would be [0, 10] since the side length of the square cutouts cannot be greater than half the length or width of the original piece of metal, which is 12 and 10 respectively.

To calculate V(x), we simply substitute x into the formula for V(x):

V(x) = 4x^3 - 88x^2 + 480x

Let's say we want to calculate V(2):

V(2) = 4(2)^3 - 88(2)^2 + 480(2)

= 16 - 352 + 960

= 624

Therefore, the volume of the box when the side length of the square cutouts is 2 inches is 624 cubic inches.

The rate of the river current is 5 mph.
Let x represent the rate of the river current. When Kellen travels upstream, she goes against the current, so her effective speed will be (15 - x) mph. When she travels downstream, she goes with the current, so her effective speed will be (15 + x) mph.

We're given that the time it takes to travel 2 miles upstream is the same as the time it takes to travel 4 miles downstream. We can express time as distance divided by speed.

So, we have the equation:

(2 mi) / (15 - x) = (4 mi) / (15 + x)

Now, we need to solve for x:

Cross-multiply:

2(15 + x) = 4(15 - x)

Distribute:

30 + 2x = 60 - 4x

Add 4x to both sides:

6x = 30

Divide by 6:

x = 5

Learn more about Boat speeds here: brainly.com/question/24229194
#SPJ11

In order to determine if the golf instructional expert's claim is accurate, the LPGA would need to analyze the data collected from the random sample of 45 students.

Based on the given information, the new golf instructional expert claims that her students can hit their drivers an average of 300 yards. However, the LPGA is skeptical about this claim and believes that the students actually hit the ball less than that. To test this hypothesis, the LPGA took a random sample of 45 of her students.

By taking a random sample, the LPGA can estimate the average driving distance of all of the expert's students. If the sample's average is significantly less than 300 yards, then the LPGA's hypothesis would be supported. On the other hand, if the sample's average is close to 300 yards, then the new golf instructional expert's claim would be supported.

It is important to note that the average driving distance of a random sample may not necessarily represent the average driving distance of all of the expert's students. However, taking a random sample is a reliable way to estimate the population's average with a certain level of confidence.

To address your question, let's break it down into steps:

1. A golf instructional expert claims that her students can hit their drivers an average of 300 yards.
2. The LPGA believes this claim is inaccurate and thinks the students' actual average distance is less than 300 yards.
3. To test the claim, the LPGA takes a random sample of 45 students from the golf instructional expert's students.

In order to determine if the golf instructional expert's claim is accurate, the LPGA would need to analyze the data collected from the random sample of 45 students. They would calculate the average distance these students can hit their drivers and compare it to the claimed 300-yard average. If the actual average distance is significantly less than 300 yards, the LPGA would have evidence to dispute the golf instructional expert's claim.

Learn more about random sample at: brainly.com/question/31523301

#SPJ11

Complete Question:

A new golf instructional expert is on the scene. She claims that her students can hit their drivers an average of 300 yards. The LPGA does not think that this is accurate and that the students actually hit the ball less than that. The LPGA took a random sample of 45 of her students. Assume an error level of 5%. What is the null hypothesis?

Answer:

(-4, 4)

Step-by-step explanation:

5x + y = -16

2x + y = -4

Eliminate the y variable.

5x + y = -16

-1 (2x + y = -4)

Solve:

5x + y = -16

-2x - y = 4

3x = -12

Divide both sides by 3.

x = -4

5(-4) + y = -16

-20 + y = -16

Add 20 to both sides.

y = 4

The next step in solving the equation, if the first step was to subtract 5, is to A. add x.

To solve the equation -x + 6 = 5 - 3x, given that its first step is "subtract 5", one should move on to the next step which requires adding x to both sides of the equation.

Upon completing this newly introduced action, the resulting equation can be viewed as follows:

-x + 6 - 5 = 5 - 3x - 5

-x + 1 = -3x

-x + x + 1 = -3x + x

1 = -2x

By isolating x term on the right side of the equation through addition, resolving for x will become much more manageable and feasible in the succeeding steps.

Find out more on steps at https://brainly.com/question/29785805

#SPJ1

Answer: 6.25

Step-by-step explanation:

You have to divided 43.75 ounces by 7 which equals 6.25

The answer is (3) 0.

For the first integral, we have:

I = ∭W x^2 + y^2 dV

Using cylindrical coordinates, we have:

x = r cos(theta)

y = r sin(theta)

z = z

where 0 <= r <= 5, 0 <= theta <= 2pi, and -5 <= z <= 1.

Also, dV = r dz dr d(theta)

Substituting these into the integral, we have:

I = ∭W r^2 dV

= ∫(0 to 2pi) ∫(0 to 5) ∫(-5 to 1) r^2 (r dz dr d(theta)) dz dr d(theta)

= ∫(0 to 2pi) ∫(0 to 5) [(r^4/4)(1 - (-5))] dr d(theta)

= ∫(0 to 2pi) ∫(0 to 5) (13r^4/4) dr d(theta)

= ∫(0 to 2pi) [(13/20)r^5] from 0 to 5 d(theta)

= ∫(0 to 2pi) (13/20)(5^5) d(theta)

= (13/20)(3125)(2pi)

= 112pi

Therefore, the answer is (1) 112π.

For the second integral, we have:

I = ∭W y dV

Using cylindrical coordinates, we have:

x = r cos(theta)

y = r sin(theta)

z = z

where 2 <= r <= 4, 0 <= theta <= 2pi, and 0 <= z <= x+6.

Also, dV = r dz dr d(theta)

Substituting these into the integral, we have:

I = ∭W y dV

= ∫(0 to 2pi) ∫(2 to 4) ∫(0 to r cos(theta)+6) r sin(theta) (r dz dr d(theta)) dz dr d(theta)

= ∫(0 to 2pi) ∫(2 to 4) [(r^3 sin(theta)/3)(r cos(theta)+6)] dr d(theta)

= ∫(0 to 2pi) ∫(2 to 4) [(r^4/3) cos(theta) + 2r^3/3] sin(theta) dr d(theta)

= ∫(0 to 2pi) [(4^4/3 - 2^4/3)(cos(theta)/4) + 2(4^3/3 - 2^3/3)/3] sin(theta) d(theta)

= ∫(0 to 2pi) [(16/3)(cos(theta)/4) + (32/3)] sin(theta) d(theta)

= 0

Therefore, the answer is (3) 0.

To learn more about coordinates visit:

https://brainly.com/question/16634867

#SPJ11

Answer: 568mm ²

Step-by-step explanation:

area of trapezoid = [h(b₁+b₂)]/2

b₁ and b₂ are the lengths of the top and bottom sides, h is the height; 16

The ordinary number form of the mentioned scientific notation form of the number is 0.00604.

Scientific notation of representation of a number refers to converting a number to its readable form. It is applicable on both small and large numbers, where value of zeroes are represented in exponential form for easy interpretation.

The exponent of -3 is interpreted as three zeroes in the denominator. The division with zero will further shorten the number by adding zeroes to left hand side of the digit after decimal. Hence, the ordinary form of the number will be 0.00604.

Learn more about scientific notation -

https://brainly.com/question/1767229

#SPJ4

The requried, (6x10¹) + (9x10¹) in scientific notation is 1.50x10²

To add (6x10^1) + (9x10^1) in scientific notation, we need to first make sure that the exponents of 10 are the same.

Now we can add the two numbers:

6.0x10¹ + 9.0x10¹ = 15.0x10¹

To express the result in scientific notation, we need to write 15.0 as 1.50 and move the decimal point one place to the left, which gives:

1.50x10²

Therefore, (6x10¹) + (9x10¹) in scientific notation is 1.50x10².

Learn more about scientific notation here:

https://brainly.com/question/18073768

#SPJ1

If the null hypothesis is not rejected, we cannot conclude that there is a significant difference between the two time periods.

Assuming that the question is "Has real gross domestic product per capita significantly increased between 1988 and 1990?" We can use a paired-sample t-test to answer this question.

Here are the steps to conduct the paired-sample t-test:

Null hypothesis: The mean difference between the real gross domestic product per capita in 1988 and 1990 is zero. In other words, there is no significant difference between the two time periods.

Alternative hypothesis: The mean difference between the real gross domestic product per capita in 1988 and 1990 is not zero. In other words, there is a significant difference between the two time periods.

Determine the level of significance, alpha (α). Let's assume α = 0.05.

Calculate the difference between the two time periods (1990 - 1988) for each observation.

Calculate the mean and standard deviation of the differences.

Calculate the standard error of the mean difference (SEd) by dividing the standard deviation of the differences by the square root of the sample size.

Calculate the t-statistic by dividing the mean difference by the SEd.

Calculate the degrees of freedom (df) using the formula: df = n - 1, where n is the sample size.

Determine the critical t-value from the t-distribution table with df = n - 1 and α = 0.05.

Compare the calculated t-value with the critical t-value. If the calculated t-value is greater than the critical t-value, reject the null hypothesis. Otherwise, fail to reject the null hypothesis.

Interpret the results. If we reject the null hypothesis, we can conclude that there is a significant difference between the two time periods, and the direction of the difference can be determined by the sign of the mean difference.

Note: In order to conduct the paired-sample t-test, we need to assume that the differences are normally distributed and the variances of the two populations are equal.

After conducting the test, we can conclude whether there is a significant difference in real gross domestic product per capita between 1988 and 1990. If the null hypothesis is rejected, we can conclude that there is a significant difference between the two time periods. If the null hypothesis is not rejected, we cannot conclude that there is a significant difference between the two time periods.

Complete question: Two of the variables in this file ( rgdpch and rgdp88) measure real Gross Domestic Product (GDP) per capita in 1990 and 1988. Please conduct the appropriate t-test to answer the following question:

Is there statistically significant evidence that per capita GDP in 1988 is different from that of 1990? Please show your results and reasoning to justify your answer.

To learn more about Alternative visit:

https://brainly.com/question/29454589

#SPJ11

The statement provided in the question is true. The statistical power of a test is the probability of correctly rejecting a false null hypothesis. It is the ability of a statistical test to detect a true effect, given that one exists. In other words, it is the likelihood that a study will be able to detect a difference or relationship between variables if such a difference or relationship truly exists in the population being studied.

The statistical power of a test depends on several factors, including the sample size, the effect size, and the level of significance chosen for the test. A larger sample size, a larger effect size, and a smaller level of significance all increase the power of a test. A low statistical power may indicate that the sample size is too small or that the test is not sensitive enough to detect the true effect.

Therefore, it is important to consider statistical power when designing and interpreting studies.

To know more about hypothesis

brainly.com/question/30404845

#SPJ11

-5, view below for what Maureen did wrong.

Given:

   -1.2+(-3.8)

A positive times a negative is a negative:

   -1.2-3.8

Subtract:

   -5

   Instead of distributing the positive sign into the -3.8 and subtracting, Maureen added 1.2 to -3.8, leading to -2.6 instead of -5.

Based on the chord-arc theorem, the value of x in the circle shown is calculated as: x = 8.

The theorem states that if two chords of equal circle are congruent, then the arcs they intercepted would be congruent to each other.

The image shows that both chords are equal, therefore, their intercepted arcs would be congruent. Thus, we have:

4x + 7 = 5x - 1

Combine like terms:

4x - 5x = -7 - 1

-x = -8

x = 8

Learn more about chord-arc theorem on:

https://brainly.com/question/21691934

#SPJ1

The inverse of the function f(x) = x³ + 1 is f⁻¹(x) = ∛(x - 1).

Given the function in the question;

f(x)  = x³ + 1

To determine the inverse of the function  f(x) = x³ + 1,

we can follow these steps:

Step 1: Replace f(x) with y

y = x³ + 1

Step 2: Solve for x in terms of y

y = x³ + 1

y - 1 = x³

x = ∛(y - 1)

Step 3: Replace x with f⁻¹(x) to get the inverse function

f⁻¹(x) = ∛(x - 1)

Therefore, the inverse of is f⁻¹(x) = ∛(x - 1).

Learn more about functions here: https://brainly.com/question/17872426

#SPJ1

Answer:

The answer is approximately 50ft

Step-by-step explanation:

arrc length=0/360/2pir

L=150/360×2×22/7×19

L=1254001/2520

L≈50ft

a) The probability that a person waits fewer than 12.5 minutes is 0.8333 or 83.33%.

b) On average, a person must wait 7.5 minutes, with a standard deviation of approximately 4.3301 minutes.

c) Ninety percent of the time, the minutes a person must wait falls below 13.5 minutes.

To find the probability that a person waits fewer than 12.5 minutes, you can use the formula for a uniform distribution:

P(X < x) = (x - a) / (b - a)

Where X is the random variable (waiting time), a is the minimum waiting time (0 minutes), b is the maximum waiting time (15 minutes), and x is the given time (12.5 minutes).

P(X < 12.5) = (12.5 - 0) / (15 - 0)

= 12.5 / 15

= 5/6 ≈ 0.833

So, the probability that a person waits fewer than 12.5 minutes is approximately 0.833 or 83.3%.

For a uniform distribution, the mean (average waiting time) can be calculated using the formula μ = (a + b) / 2, and the standard deviation using the formula σ = [tex]\sqrt{\frac{{(b - a)^2}}{{12}}}[/tex].

Mean (μ) = (0 + 15) / 2 = 7.5 minutes

Standard deviation (σ) = [tex]\sqrt{\left(\frac{{15 - 0}}{2}\right)^2}[/tex]

Standard deviation (σ) = [tex]\sqrt{\frac{{15^2}}{{12}}}[/tex] ≈ 4.33 minutes

On average, a person must wait 7.5 minutes for a bus, with a standard deviation of approximately 4.33 minutes.

To find the value below which 90% of the time falls, we multiply the desired percentile (90%) by the total range of possible values (15 - 0 = 15) and add it to the lower bound, giving us:

= 0.9 x 15 + 0

= 13.5 minutes

Learn more about standard deviation: https://brainly.com/question/475676

#SPJ11

The solution is : 140 cm of the original piece is left after Joe cuts three pieces.

Given that,

Given the piece of string

3.5m

As we know that

3.5m = 350 cm

so the length of a piece of string = 350 cm

As joe cuts three pieces from it, and each 70 cm long.

so the total length of three pieces which were

cut by joe = 70cm + 70cm + 70cm = 210 cm

So, subtracting the total length of the three pieces that were cut from the total length of the string:

350 cm - 210 cm = 140 cm

Therefore, 140 cm of the original piece is left after Joe cuts three pieces from it.

To earn more on addition click:

brainly.com/question/29560851

#SPJ1

complete question:

A piece of string is 3-5 m long. Joe cuts three pieces from it,

each 70 cm long. How much of the original piece is left?​

Answer:

504

Step-by-step explanation:

use pemdas

multiply 8 and 7 first then u have 56 so multiply it by 9

The expression 9x (8x7) can be rewritten as (9x8) x7 or 72x7 by using the associative law of multiplication. This law states that the way numbers are grouped doesn't affect the result of multiplication.

The question asks to rewrite 9x (8x7) using the associative law of multiplication. The associative law of multiplication, in basic terms, states that the way in which numbers are grouped in multiplication does not change the result.

To apply this law to the given expression, we just need to change the grouping of the numbers. Instead of grouping (8x7) together, we could group (9x8) together. So, the content loaded rewrite of 9x (8x7) using the associative law of multiplication would be: (9x8) x7 or we can write it as 72x7.

This does not change the result of the multiplication, thus demonstrating the associative property. This is a helpful principle to understand, as it is commonly applied in a variety of mathematical operations and can simplify complex equations.

https://brainly.com/question/35585926

#SPJ2

The difference in the Beatles length is 1 / 10 centimetres.

Serena is measuring the length of beetles for a science project .One beetle measures 4/5 cm and another measure 7/10 cm.

Therefore, the difference in the beetles length can be calculated as follows:

Hence,

difference between the beetles length = 4 / 5 - 7 / 10

difference between the beetles length = 8 - 7 / 10

difference between the beetles length = 1 / 10 centimetres

learn more on difference here: https://brainly.com/question/30449218

#SPJ1