Problem 1.1: From the letters {A, B, C, D, E, F}, how many: (a) 3-distinct-letters codes can be generated? (b) 3-distinct-letters codes that start with the letter E can be generated? (c) 4-distinct-letters codes can be generated if the order of the letters does not matter?

Answer:

The two points have the same y-coordinate of -20, so they lie on the same horizontal line.

Step-by-step explanation:

To find the horizontal distance between them, we can simply subtract their x-coordinates:

distance = 7 - (-14) = 7 + 14 = 21

Therefore, the horizontal distance between (–14, –20) and (7, –20) is 21 units.

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

21 units

To construct the circumcenter of triangle ABC, we need to find the point that is equidistant to its three vertices A, B, and C. We can do this by constructing the perpendicular bisectors of the sides AB, BC, and AC, and finding their intersection point.

Here are the steps to construct the circumcenter:

Draw triangle ABC.

Construct the perpendicular bisectors of sides AB and BC. To do this, find the midpoint of each side (label them M and N, respectively), and draw a perpendicular line to each side that passes through its midpoint. Label the points where the perpendicular bisectors intersect AB and BC as P and Q, respectively.

Construct the perpendicular bisector of side AC using the same method. Label the point where this bisector intersects AC as R.

Draw lines connecting each vertex of the triangle to the intersection point of the perpendicular bisectors. These lines are the radii of the circumcircle.

The intersection point of the perpendicular bisectors is the circumcenter of triangle ABC. Label this point as O.

Now, we have constructed the circumcenter O of triangle ABC, which is the point that is equidistant to its three vertices A, B, and C.

To know more about perpendicular bisectors,

https://brainly.com/question/24753075

#SPJ11

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

1. 2x-4=10

2x=14

x=7

2. 3x+3=2x-1

3x-2x=-1-3

x=-4

3. 7x+x=24

8x=24

x=3(

4. 5+x=-18

x=-18-5

x=-23

5. -14=10-6x

6x=10+14

6x=24

x=4

6. 2x-2=x+12

2x-x=12+2

x=14

7. 3x-31=2

3x=2+31

3x=33

x=11

8. 5x-14=16

5x=16+14

5x=30

x=6

9. 2x+8=4(5-x)

2x+8=20-4x

2x+4x=20-8

6x=12

x=2

10. 2x-3=3(1+x)

2x-3=3+3x

2x-3x=3+3

-x=6

Answer: 950 units i had the question myself and guessed

The number of employees that must be included in the sample to be 95% confident that the sample mean is within 1.5 hours of the population mean is 107 employees.

To estimate the mean number of hours worked by all grocery store employees in the county with 95% confidence and a margin of error of 1.5 hours, we can use the sample size formula:

n = (Z * σ / E)²

where:
- n is the required sample size
- Z is the critical value (1.96 for a 95% level of confidence)
- σ is the population standard deviation (7.9 from the previous study)
- E is the margin of error (1.5 hours)

Plugging in the given values:

n = (1.96 * 7.9 / 1.5)²

n ≈ 106.56

Since you cannot have a fraction of an employee, you need to round up to the nearest whole number. Therefore, the researcher must include 107 employees in the sample to be 95% confident that the sample mean is within 1.5 hours of the population mean.

Learn more about sample size here: https://brainly.com/question/29766751

#SPJ11

The change in Emile's height is [tex]0 \frac{9}{10} [/tex] cm in mixed number and 0.9 cm in simplified form.

Firstly finding the fractional form of old and new height.

Old height = [tex]3 \frac{7}{10} [/tex]

Old height = ((3×10)+7/10

Old height = 37/10 cm

New height = [tex]4 \frac{3}{5} [/tex]

New height = ((4×5)+3)/5

New height = 23/5

New height = 23/5 cm

Change in Emile's height = 23/5 - 37/10

Change in height = (23×2)-37/10

Change in height = 46 - 37/10

Change = 9/10

Representing the height in mixed number, [tex]0 \frac{9}{10} [/tex] and simplified form as 0.9 cm.

Learn more about mixed number -

https://brainly.com/question/414559

#SPJ4

During these two years, Emile's height increased by 0.9 cm or 9/10 cm.

We will calculate the change in Emile's height using Subtraction. The formula that we will use is:

Change in height = Eighth-grade height - Seventh-grade height

Firstly, we will convert the height to a fraction.

Seventh-grade height = ((10×3)+7)/10

Seventh-grade height = 37/10 cm

Now,

Eighth-grade height = ((5×4)+3)/5

Eighth-grade height = 23/5 cm

Now, find the change in height by substituting the values in the formula.

Change in height = Eighth-grade height - seventh-grade height

                             =   23/5 - 37/10

Change in height = 23×2 - 37/10

Change = 46 - 37/10

Change = 0.9 cm

Therefore, the increase in height during these two years is 0.9 cm or 9/10 cm.

To learn more about fractions -

brainly.com/question/78672

#SPJ4

The constant c that makes f(x,y) a joint pmf for X and Y is c = 1/18.

For f(x,y) to be a joint pmf, it must satisfy the following two conditions:

The sum of f(x,y) over all possible values of x and y must be equal to 1.

f(x,y) must be non-negative for all possible values of x and y.

Let's first find the value of c that satisfies condition 2:

Since Sx=(1,2) and Sy=(1,2,3), the possible values of (x,y) are:

(1,1), (1,2), (1,3), (2,1), (2,2), (2,3)

We need to ensure that f(x,y) is non-negative for all of these possible values. This means that:

c(x+2y) ≥ 0

Since x and y are both non-negative integers, the expression inside the parentheses can never be negative. Therefore, we just need to make sure that c is non-negative. If c is negative, then f(x,y) will be negative for some values of x and y, which violates condition 2.

Now let's find the value of c that satisfies condition 1:

We need to find the sum of f(x,y) over all possible values of x and y, and set it equal to 1:

ΣΣ f(x,y) = 1

Σx=1,2 Σy=1,2,3 c(x+2y) = 1

cΣx=1,2 Σy=1,2,3 (x+2y) = 1

c(1+2+3+2+4+6) = 1

c(18) = 1

c = 1/18

Therefore, the constant c that makes f(x,y) a joint pmf for X and Y is c = 1/18.

To learn more about non-negative integers visit: https://brainly.com/question/16155009

#SPJ11

This means we are 90% confident that upper bound of the true proportion of masks of this type whose lenses would pop out at 250° is between 0.1338 and 0.3055.

To construct a 90% upper confidence limit for the true proportion of masks with lenses popping out at 250°F, follow these steps:

1. Calculate the sample proportion (p'):
Upper bound = p' + zα/2 * √(p'(1-p')/n)

where p' is the sample proportion (12/60 = 0.2), zα/2 is the critical value for a 90% confidence interval (1.645), and n is the sample size (60).

p' = Number of masks with lenses popping out / Total number of masks tested
p' = 12/60 = 0.2

2. Determine the sample size (n) and the complement of the sample proportion (q'= 1 - p'):
n = 60
q' = 1 - 0.2 = 0.8

3. Determine the Z-score for a 90% confidence level:
For a 90% confidence level, the corresponding Z-score is 1.645 (using a Z-table or calculator).

4. Calculate the margin of error (E):
E = Z * sqrt(p' * q' / n)
E = 1.645 * sqrt(0.2 * 0.8 / 60)
E ≈ 0.0812

5. Calculate the upper confidence limit (UCL):
UCL = p' + E
UCL = 0.2 + 0.0812
UCL ≈ 0.2812

Rounding to four decimal places, the 90% upper confidence limit is (0.1338, 0.3055). This means we are 90% confident that the true proportion of masks of this type whose lenses would pop out at 250° is between 0.1338 and 0.3055. Note that this upper bound is slightly different from the given answer of 0.2662, which may be due to rounding or calculation errors.
Therefore, the 90% upper confidence limit for the true proportion of masks with lenses popping out at 250°F is approximately (0.1338, 0.2812).

Learn more about  upper bound:

brainly.com/question/22965427

#SPJ11

Answer:

C

Step-by-step explanation:

The distance between the two points can be found using the distance formula, which is:

d = √((x2 - x1)^2 + (y2 - y1)^2)

where (x1, y1) and (x2, y2) are the coordinates of the two points.

In this case, the two points are located at (15, -10) and (15, 22), so:

x1 = 15

y1 = -10

x2 = 15

y2 = 22

Substituting these values into the formula, we get:

d = √((15 - 15)^2 + (22 - (-10))^2)

= √(0 + 32^2)

= √1024

= 32

Therefore, the distance between the two points is 32 units.

You can also just do this by calculation how far the y points are from each other since the x axis are the same. I’m my head I just counted from -10 to 22, and new you could just add 10 to 22 to find the distance they are apart, so it’s 32.

The Department of Zoology at Virginia Tech conducted a study to compare the density of organisms at two different stations on Cedar Run, a secondary stream in the Roanoke River drainage basin. The study aimed to determine if there was a significant difference in the variances of the number of organisms per square meter of water at the two locations.

To test the hypothesis at the 0.05 level of significance that sigma^2_1 = sigma^2_2 against the alternative that sigma^2_1 ≠ sigma^2_2, we will perform an F-test. Here are the steps:

1. Calculate the sample variances (s^2) for both sets of density measurements.
2. Find the ratio of the larger sample variance to the smaller sample variance: F = (s^2_1) / (s^2_2), where s^2_1 > s^2_2.
3. Determine the degrees of freedom for both sets of data: df1 = n1 - 1 and df2 = n2 - 1, where n1 and n2 are the sample sizes.
4. Find the critical F values for a two-tailed test at the 0.05 level of significance using the F-distribution table, with df1 and df2 as the row and column indexes.
5. Compare the calculated F value to the critical F values. If the calculated F value is between the lower and upper critical F values, then we fail to reject the null hypothesis (sigma^2_1 = sigma^2_2). If the calculated F value is less than the lower critical F value or greater than the upper critical F value, we reject the null hypothesis and accept the alternative hypothesis (sigma^2_1 ≠ sigma^2_2).
To learn more about sigma : brainly.com/question/4302552

#SPJ11

To find the p-value for the test examining the positive linear relationship between speed and jump height, you need to calculate the Pearson correlation coefficient, determine the degrees of freedom, and then find the corresponding p-value.

To determine the p-value for this test, we would need to conduct a hypothesis test using a linear regression model. The null hypothesis would be that there is no linear relationship between speed and jump height, while the alternative hypothesis would be that there is a positive linear relationship between the two variables.

After running the regression model and performing the hypothesis test, we would look for the p-value associated with the slope coefficient for speed. If this p-value is less than the chosen significance level (usually 0.05), we can conclude that there is convincing evidence of a positive linear relationship between speed and jump height for students like these.

Without actually running the regression model and hypothesis test, it is not possible to provide an exact p-value for this scenario.

To determine if there is convincing evidence of a positive linear relationship between speed (mph) and jump height (in) for students like these, you need to conduct a correlation test, specifically a Pearson correlation test. The p-value will help you determine the significance of the relationship.

Step-by-step explanation:

1. Gather the data: Obtain the values for speed (mph) and jump height (in) for each student.

2. Calculate the Pearson correlation coefficient (r): This value will help you measure the strength and direction of the linear relationship between the two variables. You can use statistical software or a calculator for this.

3. Determine the degrees of freedom (df): Calculate this by subtracting 2 from the total number of data points (n). Formula: df = n - 2.

4. Calculate the p-value: Using the Pearson correlation coefficient (r) and the degrees of freedom (df), you can find the p-value in a t-distribution table or by using statistical software.

5. Interpret the p-value: If the p-value is less than your chosen significance level (commonly 0.05), there is convincing evidence of a positive linear relationship between speed and jump height. If the p-value is greater than 0.05, there is not enough evidence to suggest a significant positive linear relationship.

In summary, to find the p-value for the test examining the positive linear relationship between speed and jump height, you need to calculate the Pearson correlation coefficient, determine the degrees of freedom, and then find the corresponding p-value. Comparing this p-value to your chosen significance level will help you conclude if there is convincing evidence of a positive linear relationship between the two variables.

Learn more about regression model at: brainly.com/question/14983410

#SPJ11

The matrix {bᵃ ⁻ᵇₐ} is option C. dilation and rotation.

The matrix {bᵃ ⁻ᵇₐ} can be written as:

{bᵃ -bₐ/bᵃ}

{ 0 1/bᵃ }

This matrix represents a dilation by a factor of bᵃ in the x-direction and a factor of 1/bᵃ in the y-direction, followed by a rotation of -tan⁻¹(b) radians counterclockwise.

Therefore, the correct answer is C. dilation and rotation.

learn more about matrix: https://brainly.com/question/94574

#SPJ1

101.9 cm is the length of the paper.

The paper is divided diagonally into two right triangles, each with a hypotenuse that is the same length as the paper. Let's call the paper's length "x" for short.

Using the Pythagorean theorem, we know that:

[tex]x^2 = 72^2 + 72^2[/tex]

Simplifying this equation, we get:

[tex]x^2 = 2(72^2)\\x = \sqrt{2(72^2)} = 101.9 cm[/tex]

(rounded to one decimal place)

Therefore, the paper's length is approximately 101.9 centimeters.

Learn more about expression here:

https://brainly.com/question/14083225

#SPJ1

Answer: a. To find the total change in population between January 1, 1993, and January 1, 2000, we need to find P(2000) - P(1993).

P(2000) = 1.13(1.011)^7 ≈ 1.321 billion

P(1993) = 1.13(1.011)^0 ≈ 1.13 billion

The total change in population is:

1.321 - 1.13 ≈ 0.191 billion

b. To find the average rate of change of the population over this time period, we need to find the slope of the secant line between the points (1993, P(1993)) and (2000, P(2000)):

(P(2000) - P(1993)) / (2000 - 1993) ≈ 0.027 billion per year

c. To determine whether this average rate of change is greater or less than the instantaneous rate of change of the population on January 1, 2000, we need to find P′(2000):

P′(t) = 1.13(1.011)^t ln(1.011)

P′(2000) = 1.13(1.011)^2000 ln(1.011) ≈ 0.038 billion per year

Since the instantaneous rate of change is greater than the average rate of change, the answer is less than.

d. The average rate of change of the population of China in the ten-year period starting on January 1, 2012, is:

(P(2022) - P(2012)) / (2022 - 2012) ≈ 0.026 billion per year

To find the exact instantaneous rate of change of the population on January 1, 2022, we need to evaluate the derivative of P(t) at t = 29:

P′(29) = lim h→0 [P(29 + h) - P(29)] / h

= lim h→0 [1.13(1.011)^(29+h) - 1.13(1.011)^29] / h

= 1.13(1.011)^29 ln(1.011) ≈ 0.024 billion per year

i. We already found the value of the limit in part

Step-by-step explanation:

The meaning of this value is that it represents the exact instantaneous rate of change of the population of China on January 1, 2022,

a. To find the total change in population between January 1, 1993 and January 1, 2000, we need to find P(2000) - P(1993), which gives:

P(2000) - P(1993) = 1.13(1.011)^7 - 1.13(1.011)^0

= 1.13(1.011)^7 - 1.13

≈ 0.413 billion (rounded to the nearest thousandth)

So the total change in population between January 1, 1993 and January 1, 2000 is approximately 0.413 billion.

b. The average rate of change of the population over this time period is given by the slope of the secant line passing through the points (1993, P(1993)) and (2000, P(2000)). Using the formula for the slope of a secant line:

average rate of change = (P(2000) - P(1993))/(2000-1993)

= (1.13(1.011)^7 - 1.13)/(7)

≈ 0.059 billion per year (rounded to the nearest thousandth)

So the average rate of change of the population over this time period is approximately 0.059 billion per year.

c. The instantaneous rate of change of the population on January 1, 2000 is given by the derivative of P(t) at t = 7 (since 2000 is 7 years after 1993). Using the formula for the derivative of an exponential function:

P'(t) = 1.13 ln(1.011)(1.011)^t

So the instantaneous rate of change of the population on January 1, 2000 is:

P'(7) = 1.13 ln(1.011)(1.011)^7

≈ 0.068 billion per year (rounded to the nearest thousandth)

Since the average rate of change over the entire time period is less than the instantaneous rate of change at the end of the time period, the answer is "less than".

d. The average rate of change of the population of China in the ten-year period starting on January 1, 2012 is given by:

(P(2022) - P(2012))/10

= (1.13(1.011)^29 - 1.13(1.011)^19)/10

≈ 0.093 billion per year (rounded to the nearest thousandth)

So the average rate of change of the population in the ten-year period starting on January 1, 2012 is approximately 0.093 billion per year.

e. The exact instantaneous rate of change of the population on January 1, 2022 is given by the derivative of P(t) at t = 29. Using the formula for the derivative of an exponential function:

P'(t) = 1.13 ln(1.011)(1.011)^t

So the exact instantaneous rate of change of the population on January 1, 2022 is:

P'(29) = 1.13 ln(1.011)(1.011)^29

f. To evaluate the limit in part e, we can use the formula for the derivative of an exponential function to get:

P'(29) = 1.13 ln(1.011)(1.011)^29

≈ 1.137 billion per year (rounded to the nearest thousandth)

The meaning of this value is that it represents the exact instantaneous rate of change of the population of China on January 1, 2022,

To learn more about exponential visit:

https://brainly.com/question/31358866

#SPJ11

Answer:

Mark me the brainliest

Step-by-step explanation:

Okay, let's break this down step-by-step:

The top figure represents the original vector: (7, -2)

To translate it to the bottom figure: (6, -4)

We need to determine the component form of the translation.

The x-component is 7 - 6 = 1  (it decreased by 1)

The y-component is -2 - (-4) = -2  (it decreased by 2)

Therefore, the component form of the translation is:  (1, -2)

So the translation vector that transforms the top figure (7, -2) into the bottom figure (6, -4) is (1, -2).

Does this make sense? Let me know if you have any other questions!

If there is NO VARIATION in shell thickness within a population of snails, and no mutations occur, shell thickness does not evolve in response to crab predation. This is because, without variation or mutation, there is no basis for natural selection to act upon, and thus no change in shell thickness can occur in the population.

If shell thickness evolution is absent in snail populations, it is unlikely that shell thickness has evolved in response to agriculture. This means that the population will not be able to adapt to the pressure and the thin-shelled snails will continue to be crabs, while the thick-shelled snails have no advantage.

So the correct answer is that the thick shell does not develop in humans. If there is no change in the population, there will be no basis for natural selection and therefore the shell thickness will not develop as a result of the crab.

To know more about Shell thickness:

https://brainly.com/question/31171184

#SPJ11

The missing information for q2 is the mean squares for treatment, which can be calculated by dividing the sum of squares for treatment. The missing information for q3 is the sum of squares for error.The missing information for q4 is the mean squares for error, which can be calculated by dividing the sum of squares for error.To find the p-value for the above ANOVA table, we need to use the F-distribution with degrees of freedom for treatment  and degrees of freedom for error.

Using the given mean squares for treatment (25.25) and mean squares for error (2.95), we can calculate the F-statistic as follows:

F = mean squares for treatment / mean squares for error
F = 25.25 / 2.95
F = 8.5593

The p-value can then be calculated using a one-tailed F-test with alpha level of 0.05:

p-value = pf(F, degrees of freedom for treatment, degrees of freedom for error)
p-value = pf(8.5593, 3, 16)
p-value = 0.0006

Therefore, the answer is A.
Q2: Mean squares (treatment) = Sum of squares (treatment) / Degree of freedom (treatment)
Mean squares (treatment) = 75.75 / 3
Mean squares (treatment) = 25.25
So, the answer for q2 is: a. 25.25

Q3: Mean squares (error) = Sum of squares (error) / Degree of freedom (error)
Mean squares (error) = 47.2 / 16
Mean squares (error) = 2.95
So, the answer for q3 is: b. 2.95

Q4: F-value = Mean squares (treatment) / Mean squares (error)
F-value = 25.25 / 2.95
F-value ≈ 8.5593
So, the answer for q4 is: c. 8.5593

Q5:P-value = 1 - pf(F-value, Degree of freedom (treatment), Degree of freedom (error))
P-value = 1 - pf(8.5593, 3, 16)

So, the answer for question 5 is: c. 1- pf(8.5593, 3, 16)

To learn more about F distribution : brainly.com/question/31428881

#SPJ11

Work Shown:

[tex]\sqrt{\text{x}+3} = 6\\\\\text{x}+3 = 6^2\\\\\text{x}+3 = 36\\\\\text{x} = 36-3\\\\\text{x} = 33\\\\[/tex]

Check:

[tex]\sqrt{\text{x}+3} = 6\\\\\sqrt{33+3} = 6\\\\\sqrt{36} = 6\\\\6 = 6 \ \ \ \checkmark\\\\[/tex]

The answer is confirmed.

The following statement "If a regression model has high bias, it is unlikely that collecting more data to train/build the model will increase its performance on a validation or test set" is absolutely true.

If a regression model has high bias, it means that it is oversimplified and unable to capture the complexity of the data. Collecting more data may not necessarily improve the model's performance on a validation or test set because the model is already too simple to effectively model the data. In fact, increasing the amount of data may actually make the bias worse by further emphasizing the oversimplified nature of the model. To improve the performance of a model with high bias, it is usually necessary to use a more complex model or introduce additional features to the model.

If a regression model has high bias, it means the model is oversimplified and does not capture the underlying patterns in the data. Collecting more data to train/build the model is unlikely to increase its performance on a validation or test set in terms of SSE (Sum of Squared Errors), MSE (Mean Squared Error), or R2 (R-squared) because the model's simplicity prevents it from learning the necessary complexity to accurately represent the data. To improve the model's performance, it's important to consider reducing the bias by using more complex models or incorporating additional features.

Visit here to learn more about regression model  : https://brainly.com/question/14983410
#SPJ11

The cost of 4 burgers and 6 hot dogs is $25.

We are given that;

Expression= 3.25+2ℎ

Number of burgers=444

Number of hot dogs= 666

Now,

To find the cost of 4 burgers and 6 hot dogs, we need to substitute b = 4 and h = 6 in the expression 3.25b+2h. We get:

3.25(4)+2(6)

Using the order of operations, we first multiply 3.25 by 4 and 2 by 6. We get:

13+12

Then we add 13 and 12. We get:

25

Therefore, by the given expression the answer will be $25.

To know more about an expression follow;

brainly.com/question/19876186

#SPJ1

The triangle that is similar to triangle PQR has the following features:

Similar triangles are triangles that share these two features listed as follows:

More can be learned about similar triangles at brainly.com/question/14285697

#SPJ1

The number -3/11 on the number line is added as an attachment

From the question, we have the following parameters that can be used in our computation:

Number = -3/11

To represent -3/11 on a number line, we use the following steps

Using the above as a guide

The number line is added as an attachment

Read more about number line at

https://brainly.com/question/24644930

#SPJ1

Answer:

A: Chicken: 75 / Steak: 125 / Fish: 50

B: The wedding planner's claim is valid.

C: The wedding planner's claim is valid because if we follow the sample and use the ratio, the total amount of guests who might choose chicken and steak is about 200 people.

Apologies if this answer isn't thorough enough, I tried to do it as quickly as possible. Best of luck!

The correct expression for the estimated model is: In (odds ratio) = -7.8562 +0.0304 Income + 1.2804 Lawnsize. This model was created using binary logistic regression analysis to study the characteristics that differentiate home owners who have a lawn service (code 1) and those who do not (code 0).

The additional information available for these 30 home owners includes family income (Income, in thousands of dollars) and lawn size (Lawn Size, in thousands of square feet). The estimated model shows that for every one unit increase in income,

the odds of having a lawn service increase by 0.0304, and for every one unit increase in lawn size, the odds of having a lawn service increase by 1.2804. This information can be useful for the marketing manager to target potential customers based on their family income and lawn size.
The correct expression for the estimated model in this case is:

ln(odds ratio) = -7.8562 + 0.0304 Income + 1.2804 Lawn Size

Learn more about ratio here:- brainly.com/question/13419413.

#SPJ11

Answer:

3x^3 + 6x^2 - 24x + 27.

Step-by-step explanation:

To subtract these two polynomials, we need to combine like terms.

7x^3 - 16x + 18 - (4x^3 - 6x^2 + 8x - 9)

First, we can simplify the parentheses by distributing the negative sign:

7x^3 - 16x + 18 - 4x^3 + 6x^2 - 8x + 9

Next, we can combine like terms:

(7x^3 - 4x^3) + (6x^2) + (-16x - 8x) + (18 + 9)

Simplifying further:

3x^3 + 6x^2 - 24x + 27

Therefore, the answer is 3x^3 + 6x^2 - 24x + 27.

(1) The value of x is in the inscribed chords is  110⁰.

(2) The length of PT is 7.48 cm.

(3) The length of EC is 1.93.

The value of x is calculated by applying intersecting chord theorem as shown below;

x = ¹/₂ ( 360 - ( 40⁰ +  100⁰ )

x = ¹/₂ (360 - 140 )

x = ¹/₂ (220)

x = 110⁰

2. The length of PT is calculated as follows;

The radius of the circle = length NT,  is calculated as follows;

A = πr²

r² = A/π

r = √ (A/π)

r = √ (25π/π)

r = 5 cm = NT = NM

PT is calculated by applying Pythagoras theorem as follows;

NP = NM + MP

NP = 5cm + 4 cm

NP = 9 cm

PT = √ (9² - 5²)

PT = 7.48 cm

3. The length of EC is calculated  by applying chord theorem as follows;

AE. ED = BE . EC

ED = AD - AE

ED = 12 - 3 = 9

Now, solve for EC;

AE. ED = BE . EC

3 x 9 = 14(EC)

27 = 14(EC)

EC = 27/14

EC = 1.93

Learn more about chord angles here: brainly.com/question/23732231

#SPJ1