Prove that each sequence is monotone and bounded. Then find the limit. is (a) s
1
​
=1 and s
n+1
​
=
5
1
​
(s
n
​
+7) for n≥1. (b) s
1
​
=2 and s
n+1
​
=
5
1
​
(s
n
​
+7) for n≥1. (c) s
1
​
=2 and s
n+1
​
=
4
1
​
(2s
n
​
+7) for n≥1. (d) s
1
​
=1 and s
n+1
​
=
2s
n
​
+2
​
for n≥1. (e) s
1
​
=5 and s
n+1
​
=
4s
n
​
+1
​
for n≥1.

According to the question The work needed to stretch the spring 6 in. beyond its natural length is 36 ft-lb.

If the work required to stretch a spring 1 ft beyond its natural length is 6 ft-lb, we can find the work needed to stretch it 6 in. beyond its natural length.

Let's denote the work required to stretch the spring by W. We can set up a proportion based on the lengths and work values:

[tex]\(\frac{1 \text{ ft}}{6 \text{ ft-lb}} = \frac{6 \text{ in.}}{W \text{ ft-lb}}\)[/tex]

To find W, we can cross-multiply and solve for W:

1 ft × W ft-lb = 6 ft-lb × 6 in.

[tex]W = \(\frac{6 \text{ ft-lb} \times 6 \text{ in.}}{1 \text{ ft}}\)[/tex]

W = 36 ft-lb

Therefore, the work needed to stretch the spring 6 in. beyond its natural length is 36 ft-lb.

To know more about spring visit -

brainly.com/question/29434686

#SPJ11

At the optimal level where the present worth of cost is $3 million, the B/C ratio is 0 that is present worth of cost that optimizes the benefit/cost ratio.

To find the present worth of cost that optimizes the benefit/cost ratio, we need to solve the given equation:

(PW of benefits)² - 18 * (PW of cost) + 54 = 0

Let's solve this equation to find the present worth of cost.

By rearranging the equation, we have:

(PW of benefits)² = 18 * (PW of cost) - 54

Taking the square root of both sides, we get:

PW of benefits = √(18 * (PW of cost) - 54)

To optimize the benefit/cost ratio, we want to find the value of PW of cost that minimizes the denominator. In this case, we can consider the derivative of the benefit/cost ratio with respect to the PW of cost and set it equal to zero to find the minimum value. Taking the derivative of the benefit/cost ratio with respect to the PW of cost, we get:

d(B/C) / d(PW of cost) = -18 / (PW of benefits)

= -18 / √(18 * (PW of cost) - 54)

Setting the derivative equal to zero, we have:

-18 / √(18 * (PW of cost) - 54) = 0

Solving this equation, we find that PW of cost = $3 million.

Therefore, the present worth of cost for the project that optimizes the benefit/cost ratio is $3 million. To calculate the B/C ratio at the optimal level, we substitute the value of PW of cost into the equation:

(PW of benefits)² - 18 * (PW of cost) + 54 = 0

(PW of benefits)² - 18 * 3 + 54 = 0

(PW of benefits)² = 0

PW of benefits = 0

To know more about optimal level,

https://brainly.com/question/32379978

#SPJ11

The solution in parametric vector form is:
a = 0.3x
b = 1.6
c = 0
d = any real number

To solve the system of equations, we will use the matrix method.
First, let's write the given system in matrix form:
[ 2  6  4  12 ]
[ -2  3  -4  3 ]
[ a  b  0  0 ]
[ c  d ]
Now, perform the row operations to bring the matrix into row-echelon form:
1. Multiply R1 by -1/2 and add it to R2.
2. Multiply R1 by 2 and add it to R3.
The resulting matrix is:
[ 2  6  4  12 ]
[ 0  6  -2  9 ]
[ 0  -9  4  -9 ]
[ c  d ]
Next, perform the following row operations:
1. Multiply R2 by 1/6.
2. Multiply R3 by -1/9 and add it to R2.
The matrix becomes:
[ 2  6  4  12 ]
[ 0  1  -1/3  3/2 ]
[ 0  0  10/3  0 ]
[ c  d ]
Now, we can solve for c and d:
10/3c = 0
c = 0
d can take any value.
The solution in parametric vector form is:
a = 0.3x
b = 1.6
c = 0
d = any real number

To know more about parametric visit:

https://brainly.com/question/33413331

#SPJ11

This statement is false. It represents the logical implication that if all x satisfy P(x), then there exists a unique x satisfying P(x).

Let's evaluate each statement one by one:

13. ∀x(P(x)⇒Q(x)) ≡ ∀xP(x)⇒∀xQ(x)

This statement is true. It represents the logical equivalence between the universal quantification of an implication and the implication of universal quantifications. In other words, if for all x, P(x) implies Q(x), then it is equivalent to saying that if all x satisfy P(x), then all x satisfy Q(x).

14. ∃x(P(x)∨Q(x)) ≡ ∃xP(x)∨∃xQ(x)

This statement is true. It represents the logical equivalence between the existence of a disjunction and the disjunction of existences. In other words, if there exists an x such that P(x) or Q(x) is true, then it is equivalent to saying that there exists an x that satisfies P(x) or there exists an x that satisfies Q(x).

15. ∃x(P(x)∧Q(x)) ≡ ∃xP(x)∧∃xQ(x)

This statement is false. It represents the logical equivalence between the existence of a conjunction and the conjunction of existences. However, the statement is not true in general. The existence of an x such that P(x) and Q(x) are both true does not necessarily imply that there exists an x that satisfies P(x) and there exists an x that satisfies Q(x). For example, consider the domain of natural numbers, where P(x) represents "x is even" and Q(x) represents "x is odd." There is no number that satisfies both P(x) and Q(x), yet there are numbers that satisfy P(x) and numbers that satisfy Q(x) individually.

16. ∃!xP(x)⇒∃xP(x)

This statement is true. It represents the logical implication that if there exists a unique x satisfying P(x), then there exists an x satisfying P(x). This is true because if there is only one x that satisfies P(x), then that x also exists and satisfies P(x).

17. ∃!x¬P(x)⇒¬∀xP(x)

This statement is false. It represents the logical implication that if there exists a unique x such that not P(x) is true, then it is not the case that all x satisfy P(x). However, this is not necessarily true. It is possible for there to be a unique x such that not P(x) is true, but still, all other x satisfy P(x).

18. ∀xP(x)⇒∃!xP(x) [Assume the domain has more than one element.]

This statement is false. It represents the logical implication that if all x satisfy P(x), then there exists a unique x satisfying P(x). However, this is not true in general. It is possible for all x to satisfy P(x) without there being a unique x that satisfies P(x). For example, consider the domain of natural numbers, where P(x) represents "x is positive." All natural numbers satisfy P(x), but there is no unique natural number that satisfies P(x).

To know more about number click-
http://brainly.com/question/24644930
#SPJ11

The general solution of the second-order linear homogeneous differential equation y'' - 6y' + 5y = 0 using the Power Series Method is y = c₁e^x + c₂e^(5x).

To solve the given differential equation using the Power Series Method, we assume a power series solution of the form y = ∑ₙ=0∞ aₙxⁿ, where a₀ and a₁ are given coefficients, and we need to determine the values of a₂, a₃, and a₄ in terms of a₀ and a₁.

1) Differentiating y, we obtain y' = ∑ₙ=1∞ (aₙn)xⁿ⁻¹.

Then, differentiating y' again, we have y'' = ∑ₙ=2∞ (aₙn(n-1))xⁿ⁻².

2) Substituting y, y', and y'' into the original differential equation, we get ∑ₙ=2∞ (aₙn(n-1))xⁿ⁻² - 6∑ₙ=1∞ (aₙn)xⁿ⁻¹ + 5∑ₙ=0∞ aₙxⁿ = 0.

3) Grouping terms according to their powers of x, we obtain the following equation:

∑ₙ=0∞ [(aₙ(n+2)(n+1) - 6aₙ₋₁n + 5aₙ₋₂)xⁿ] + [2a₂ - 6a₁ + 5a₀] = 0.

Since the terms with the same power of x must sum to zero, we set each coefficient equal to zero:

aₙ(n+2)(n+1) - 6aₙ₋₁n + 5aₙ₋₂ = 0 for n ≥ 2,

and solve for a₂, a₃, and a₄ in terms of a₀ and a₁.

4) Solving the equations, we find:

a₂ = (6a₁ - 5a₀) / 2,

a₃ = (20a₀ - 12a₁) / 6,

a₄ = (42a₁ - 30a₀) / 24.

5) Finally, we can write the solution y(x) up to x³ terms by substituting the values of a₀, a₁, a₂, a₃, and a₄ into the power series representation of y:

y(x) = a₀ + a₁x + (6a₁ - 5a₀)x²/2 + (20a₀ - 12a₁)x³/6 + ...

This is the solution to the given second-order linear homogeneous differential equation using the Power Series Method.

Learn more about Power Series Method:

brainly.com/question/29992253

#SPJ11

The rate of growth of the value of the​ collector's item was 2.795% per year.Given that a toy tractor sold for $264 in 1975 and was sold again in 1990 for $466. We are to assume that the growth in the value v of the​ collector's item was exponential.

Assuming that the growth in the value of the​ collector's item was exponential, we can use the exponential growth formula, which is given as:P(t) = P0(1+r)^t

where, P0 = initial value, r = rate of growth or decay and P(t) = value after t years.In the given problem, let P0 = $264 (initial value), r = rate of growth and P(t) = $466 (value after 1990).

The time t is 1990 - 1975 = 15 years.

Hence, we can write the formula as:

$[tex]466 = $264(1 + r)^{15}[/tex]

Dividing both sides by $264, we get:

[tex](1 + r)^{15} = $466/$264= 1.7651515.[/tex]

Taking the 15th root on both sides, we get:1 + r = 1.02795r = 0.02795 or 2.795%.

Thus, the rate of growth of the value of the​ collector's item was 2.795% per year.

For more question on growth

https://brainly.com/question/29334875

#SPJ8

The kernel of the homomorphism G → Sym(G\H) is the intersection of all conjugates of H in G.


Let H be a subgroup of G and consider the action of G on the set G\H, where G acts on G\H by left multiplication.

The homomorphism G → Sym(G\H) assigns to each element g in G the permutation of G\H induced by the action of g on G\H.

The kernel of this homomorphism is the set of elements in G that fix every element of G\H under the action. In other words, it is the intersection of all conjugates of H in G, denoted as ⋂(gHg^(-1)).

Now, suppose G is infinite but has a subgroup H of finite index k. This means that there are k distinct left cosets of H in G.

By the first isomorphism theorem, G/ker(φ) is isomorphic to a subgroup of Sym(G\H), where φ is the homomorphism G → Sym(G\H).

Since G/ker(φ) is a subgroup of Sym(G\H), and Sym(G\H) is finite, G/ker(φ) must also be finite. Therefore, ker(φ) is a normal subgroup of G and has finite index in G.

Thus, if G is infinite but has a subgroup of finite index, it also has a normal subgroup of finite index.

Learn more about Homomorphism click here :brainly.com/question/6111672

#SPJ11

A multiple-choice quiz has 15 questions,

(a) Probability of getting at least 12 correct answers by sheer guesswork is approximately 0.00000641.

(b) Expected number of correct answers is 3.

(a) To find the probability of getting at least 12 correct answers through sheer guesswork, we can use the binomial probability formula.
The probability of getting exactly k successes (correct answers) in n independent trials, each with a probability p of success(choosing the correct answer), is given by:
P(X = k) = C(n, k) * p^k * (1-p)^(n-k)
In this case, n = 15 (number of questions) and p = 1/5 (probability of choosing the correct answer).
To find the probability of getting at least 12 correct answers, we need to calculate the probability of getting exactly 12, 13, 14, and 15 correct answers, and then sum them up.
P(X ≥ 12) = P(X = 12) + P(X = 13) + P(X = 14) + P(X = 15)

P(X = 12) = 455 * (1/5)^12 * (4/5)^3 ≈ 0.00000606,

P(X = 13) = 105 * (1/5)^13 * (4/5)^2 ≈ 0.00000032,

P(X = 14) = 15 * (1/5)^14 * (4/5)^1 ≈ 0.00000003,

P(X = 15) = 1 * (1/5)^15 * (4/5)^0 ≈ 0.000000001.

P(X ≥ 12) = P(X = 12) + P(X = 13) + P(X = 14) + P(X = 15)

≈ 0.00000606 + 0.00000032 + 0.00000003 + 0.000000001

≈ 0.00000641.

Therefore, the probability that sheer guesswork will yield at least 12 correct answers is approximately 0.00000641.

(b) Expected number of correct answers:

E(X) = n * p

E(X) = 15 * (1/5)

= 3.

Therefore, the expected number of correct answers by sheer guesswork is 3.

To learn more about probability visit:

https://brainly.com/question/13604758

#SPJ11

6. r║s based on the: Consecutive Interior Angles Converse Theorem.

10. m<2 = 34°

The Consecutive Interior Angles Converse Theorem states that if two lines are intersected by a transversal, and the consecutive interior angles formed are congruent, then the lines are parallel.

6. Since m<7 + m<8 = 180°, therefore, lines r and s are parallel lines based on the Consecutive Interior Angles Converse Theorem.

10. m<1 = 180 - 72 [linear pair theorem]

m<1 = 108°

m<2 = 180 - 108 - 38 [triangle sum theorem]

m<2 = 34°

Learn more about Consecutive Interior Angles Converse on:

https://brainly.com/question/28805457

#SPJ1

On average, John can expect to need 2 coin flips each day until he sees a T.

Each day, John performs an experiment where he flips a fair coin repeatedly until he sees a T (tails) and counts the number of coin flips needed. This experiment can be modeled as a geometric distribution.

In a geometric distribution, we are interested in the number of trials needed until the first success occurs. In this case, a success is defined as seeing a T (tails) on the coin flip.

Since the coin is fair, the probability of getting a T on any individual flip is 1/2. Therefore, the probability of needing exactly k flips until the first T is (1/2)^(k-1) * (1/2), where k is the number of flips.

The mean or expected value of a geometric distribution is given by 1/p, where p is the probability of success. In this case, the expected number of coin flips needed until the first T is 1 / (1/2) = 2.

Therefore, on average, John can expect to need 2 coin flips each day until he sees a T.

Learn more about probability

https://brainly.com/question/32117953

#SPJ11

The expected number of coin flips needed until John sees a T is 2. On average, it would take John two flips to observe a T.

Each day, John performs an experiment where he flips a fair coin repeatedly until he sees a T (tail) and counts the number of coin flips needed.

Since the coin is fair, the probability of getting a T on any given flip is [tex]\( \frac{1}{2} \)[/tex]. Therefore, the number of coin flips needed follows a geometric distribution with a probability of success (getting a T) of [tex]\( \frac{1}{2} \)[/tex].

The expected value or average number of coin flips needed can be calculated using the formula for the expected value of a geometric distribution:

[tex]\[ E(X) = \frac{1}{p} \][/tex]

where [tex]\( E(X) \)[/tex] is the expected value and [tex]\( p \)[/tex] is the probability of success.

In this case, [tex]\( p = \frac{1}{2} \)[/tex], so:

[tex]\[ E(X) = \frac{1}{\frac{1}{2}} = 2 \][/tex]

Therefore, the expected number of coin flips needed until John sees a T is 2. On average, it would take John two flips to observe a T.

To know more about probability visit -

brainly.com/question/14978493

#SPJ11

The solution to the given system of equations using different methods are as follows:

(a) Naïve Gauss elimination: x = -1, y = 2, z = 0.

(b) Gauss elimination with partial pivoting: x = -1, y = 2, z = 0.

(c) Gauss-Jordan elimination without partial pivoting: x = -1, y = 2, z = 0.

(a) To solve the system of equations using naïve Gauss elimination, we perform the following steps:

1. Multiply the first equation by 6 and the third equation by 21 to eliminate x.

6x + 6y - 6z = -18

-63x + 84y + 21z = 21

2. Add the modified first equation to the second equation to eliminate x.

6x + 2y + 2z = 2

0x + 86y + 15z = 4

3: Solve the resulting system of equations.

6x + 2y + 2z = 2     (Equation 1)

0x + 86y + 15z = 4   (Equation 2)

From Equation 1, we have:

6x = 2 - 2y - 2z

x = (2 - 2y - 2z)/6

x = (1 - y - z)/3

Substituting the value of x in Equation 2, we have:

0(1 - y - z)/3 + 86y + 15z = 4

86y + 15z = 4

15z = 4 - 86y

z = (4 - 86y)/15

4. Now, we can substitute the obtained values of x and z back into the first equation to find y:

(1 - y - z)/3 + y - (4 - 86y)/15 - 3 = -3

Solving this equation, we get y = 2.

5. Substituting the values of y and z back into x, we have:

x = (1 - 2 - (4 - 86*2)/15)/3

x = -1

Therefore, the solution to the given system of equations using naïve Gauss elimination is x = -1, y = 2, z = 0.

(b) To solve the system of equations using Gauss elimination with partial pivoting, we'll perform the following steps:

1: Rearrange the equations to form an augmented matrix:

[1, 1, -1 | -3]

[6, 2, 2 | 2]

[-3, 4, 1 | 1]

2: Find the pivot element by selecting the row with the largest absolute value in the first column. Swap rows if necessary:

[6, 2, 2 | 2]

[1, 1, -1 | -3]

[-3, 4, 1 | 1]

3: Perform row operations to create zeros below the pivot element in the first column:

R2 = R2 - (1/6)R1

R3 = R3 + (1/2)R1

The new matrix becomes:

[6, 2, 2 | 2]

[0, 5/3, -5/3 | -17/3]

[0, 5, 7/2 | 5/2]

4: Continue row operations to eliminate the second variable from the third row:

R3 = R3 - (5/3)R2

The matrix after this step is:

[6, 2, 2 | 2]

[0, 5/3, -5/3 | -17/3]

[0, 0, 32/3 | 22/3]

5: Back-substitution to find the values of the variables:

z = (22/3) / (32/3) = 0

y = (-17/3 - (-5/3)z) / (5/3) = 2

x = (2 - 2y + z) / 6 = -1

Main Answer:

The solution to the given system of equations using Gauss-Jordan elimination without partial pivoting is:

x = -1

y = 2

z = 0

The solution is x = -1, y = 2, and z = 0.

(c) To solve the system of equations using Gauss-Jordan elimination without partial pivoting, we'll perform the following steps:

1: Rearrange the equations to form an augmented matrix:

[1, 1, -1 | -3]

[6, 2, 2 | 2]

[-3, 4, 1 | 1]

2: Perform row operations to create zeros above and below the pivot element in the first column:

R2 = R2 - 6R1

R3 = R3 + 3R1

The new matrix becomes:

[1, 1, -1 | -3]

[0, -4, 8 | 20]

[0, 7, -2 | -8]

3: Continue row operations to create a diagonal matrix with ones on the main diagonal and zeros elsewhere:

R1 = R1 + R2

R3 = R3 + (7/4)R2

The matrix after this step is:

[1, -3, 7 | 17]

[0, -4, 8 | 20]

[0, 0, 1 | -1]

4: Further simplify the matrix to get the final solution:

R1 = R1 + 3R3

R2 = R2 - 2R3

The matrix becomes:

[1, 0, 0 | -1]

[0, -4, 0 | 2]

[0, 0, 1 | -1]

The solution is x = -1, y = 2, and z = 0.

Learn more about Gauss elimination

brainly.com/question/32514329

#SPJ11

For case (i), the given two-parameter family of functions y = c1 e3x + c2 e3x + x^2 is the general solution of the corresponding nonhomogeneous differential equation on the interval (-∞, ∞).


To verify if a given two-parameter family of functions is the general solution of a nonhomogeneous differential equation, we substitute the functions into the differential equation and check if the equation is satisfied. In this case, when we substitute y = c1 e3x + c2 e3x + x^2 into the differential equation y'' - 4y' + 3y = 3x^2 - 8x + 2, we find that the equation is satisfied. Therefore, the given two-parameter family of functions is the general solution for this case.

For case (ii), the given two-parameter family of functions y = c1 e2x + c2 xe2x + 4sin x is the general solution of the corresponding nonhomogeneous differential equation on the interval (-∞, ∞).

Similarly, when we substitute y = c1 e2x + c2 xe2x + 4sin x into the differential equation y'' - 14y' + 49y = 192 sin x - 108 cos x, we find that the equation is satisfied. Hence, the given two-parameter family of functions is the general solution for this case.

For case (iii), the given two-parameter family of functions y = c1 x^2 + c2 x^3 + (4/x), where the interval is (0, ∞), is the general solution of the corresponding nonhomogeneous differential equation.

Explanation:
Upon substituting y = c1 x^2 + c2 x^3 + (4/x) into the differential equation x^2y'' - 4xy' + 6y = 48/x, we observe that the equation is satisfied. Therefore, the given two-parameter family of functions is the general solution for this case.

Learn more about the differential equation: https://brainly.com/question/32645495

#SPJ11

a) The corresponding relative frequency, cumulative frequency, and cumulative relative frequency distributions are as follows:

Relative Frequency:

Average mpg Frequency Relative Frequency

15 up to 20 15 0.1875

20 up to 25 30 0.375

25 up to 30 15 0.1875

30 up to 35 10 0.125

35 up to 40 7 0.0875

40 up to 45 3 0.0375

Cumulative Frequency:

Average mpg Frequency Cumulative Frequency

15 up to 20 15 15

20 up to 25 30 45

25 up to 30 15 60

30 up to 35 10 70

35 up to 40 7 77

40 up to 45 3 80

Cumulative Relative Frequency:

Average mpg Frequency Cumulative Relative Frequency

15 up to 20 15 0.1875

20 up to 25 30 0.5625

25 up to 30 15 0.75

30 up to 35 10 0.875

35 up to 40 7 0.9625

40 up to 45 3 1.0000

b-1) The number of cars that got less than 30 mpg is 60.

a) To construct the corresponding relative frequency, cumulative frequency, and cumulative relative frequency distributions, we can use the provided frequency distribution.

First, let's calculate the relative frequency by dividing each frequency by the total number of cars (80):

Average mpg Frequency Relative Frequency

15 up to 20 15 15/80 = 0.1875

20 up to 25 30 30/80 = 0.375

25 up to 30 15 15/80 = 0.1875

30 up to 35 10 10/80 = 0.125

35 up to 40 7 7/80 = 0.0875

40 up to 45 3 3/80 = 0.0375

To calculate the cumulative frequency, we sum up the frequencies as we move down the table:

Average mpg Frequency Cumulative Frequency

15 up to 20 15 15

20 up to 25 30 15 + 30 = 45

25 up to 30 15 45 + 15 = 60

30 up to 35 10 60 + 10 = 70

35 up to 40 7 70 + 7 = 77

40 up to 45 3 77 + 3 = 80

To calculate the cumulative relative frequency, we sum up the relative frequencies as we move down the table:

Average mpg Frequency Relative Frequency Cumulative Relative Frequency

15 up to 20 15 0.1875 0.1875

20 up to 25 30 0.375 0.1875 + 0.375 = 0.5625

25 up to 30 15 0.1875 0.5625 + 0.1875 = 0.75

30 up to 35 10 0.125 0.75 + 0.125 = 0.875

35 up to 40 7 0.0875 0.875 + 0.0875 = 0.9625

40 up to 45 3 0.0375 0.9625 + 0.0375 = 1.0000

b-1) To determine how many cars got less than 30 mpg, we need to sum up the frequencies for the categories below 30 mpg.

Cars with less than 30 mpg:

Frequency(15 up to 20) + Frequency(20 up to 25) + Frequency(25 up to 30) = 15 + 30 + 15 = 60

To know more about frequency,

https://brainly.com/question/12049955

#SPJ11

A particular solution of the given equation is yp(x) = (1/15)eˣ - (1/60)x + (1/120).

An equation is a mathematical statement that asserts the equality of two expressions or quantities. It consists of two sides, known as the left-hand side (LHS) and the right-hand side (RHS), connected by an equal sign (=). The LHS and RHS can contain variables, constants, mathematical operations, and functions.

Equations are used to represent various relationships and properties in mathematics, physics, engineering, and other scientific disciplines. They serve as a means to describe and solve problems, establish mathematical models, and analyze the behavior of systems.

To find a particular solution of the given equation using the method of undetermined coefficients, we assume that the particular solution can be expressed as a linear combination of terms involving exponents of x and polynomials in x.

Let's assume the particular solution is of the form:

yp(x) = Ae^x + Bx^2 + Cx + D

where A, B, C, and D are constants to be determined.

Taking the first and second derivatives of yp(x), we have:

yp'(x) = Aeˣ + 2Bx + C
yp''(x) = Aeˣ + 2B

Substituting yp(x), yp'(x), and yp''(x) back into the original equation, we get:

(Aeˣ + 2B) + 2(Aeˣ + 2Bx + C) + 8(Aeˣ + Bx² + Cx + D) = ex(5x-1)

Simplifying the equation, we have:

(A + 2C + 8D) + (2B + 8C) x + (A + 2B + 8C) eˣ + 8B x² = ex(5x-1)

To match the terms on both sides of the equation, we equate the coefficients of the corresponding terms. In this case, we have:

For the constant term: A + 2C + 8D = 0
For the coefficient of x: 2B + 8C = 0
For the coefficient of eˣ: A + 2B + 8C = 1
For the coefficient of x²: 8B = 0

Solving these equations simultaneously, we find:
A = 1/15
B = 0
C = -1/60
D = 1/120

Therefore, a particular solution of the given equation is:

yp(x) = (1/15)e^x - (1/60)x + (1/120)

To know more about equation visit:

https://brainly.com/question/29111179

#SPJ11

Answer:

bums bums pr**k book

pause

The probability that the sum 5 happens before sum 7 is 2/5.
To solve this problem, we need to find the probability of getting a sum of 5 before getting a sum of 7.
Let's consider the possible outcomes that lead to a sum of 5:
- (1, 4)
- (2, 3)
- (3, 2)
- (4, 1)
And the possible outcomes that lead to a sum of 7:
- (1, 6)
- (2, 5)
- (3, 4)
- (4, 3)
- (5, 2)
- (6, 1)
Out of these outcomes, we can see that there are 4 possible ways to get a sum of 5 and 6 possible ways to get a sum of 7.
Since the probability of any specific outcome is the same for each roll, we can conclude that the probability of getting a sum of 5 before getting a sum of 7 is 4/10, or 2/5.
Therefore, the probability that the sum 5 happens before sum 7 is 2/5.

Let us know more about probability : https://brainly.com/question/11034287.

#SPJ11

The answer is "NOT" that is  given differential equation is not exact.

To determine whether the given differential equation is exact, we need to check if the partial derivatives of the terms with respect to x and y are equal. Let's calculate these partial derivatives.

The given equation is (2xy^2 - 7)dx + (2x^2y + 6)dy = 0.

The partial derivative of the term with respect to x is:
∂/∂x (2xy^2 - 7) = 2y^2.

The partial derivative of the term with respect to y is:
∂/∂y (2x^2y + 6) = 2x^2.

Since the partial derivatives are not equal (2y^2 ≠ 2x^2), the given differential equation is not exact.

Learn more about  partial derivatives from the given link:

https://brainly.com/question/28751547

#SPJ11

To find an orthogonal basis using the Gram-Schmidt process, follow these steps Start with the first vector U1 as V1. In this case, V1 = U1 = [-2, 2; 0, 0].

Calculate the second vector V2 using the formula:
V2 = U2 - ((U2 * V1') / (V1 * V1')) * V1,
where * denotes matrix multiplication and ' denotes matrix transposition.
Plugging in the values, we have:
V2 = U2 - ((U2 * V1') / (V1 * V1')) * V1
  = [0, 16; -8, 0] - (([0, 16; -8, 0] * [-2, 2; 0, 0]') / ([-2, 2; 0, 0] * [-2, 2; 0, 0]')) * [-2, 2; 0, 0].


Now, V3 = [0, -2; 4, 2].

Therefore, the orthogonal basis under the Frobenius inner product is:
{V1 = [-2, 2; 0, 0], V2 = [0, 16; -7, 0], V3 = [0, -2; 4, 2]}.

To know more about Gram-Schmidt visit:

https://brainly.com/question/30761089

#SPJ11

To find an orthogonal basis using the Gram-Schmidt process, we start with the given basis {U1, U2, U3}.

1. Set V1 = U1. This is the first vector in the orthogonal basis.
  V1 = [-2 2; 0 0]

2. Subtract the projection of U2 onto V1 from U2 to get an orthogonal vector relative to V1.
  Projection of U2 onto V1 = (U2 • V1) / (V1 • V1) * V1
  where • represents the Frobenius inner product.
  U2 - [(U2 • V1) / (V1 • V1) * V1] = U2 - (U2 • V1) / (V1 • V1) * V1
  V2 = [0 16; -8 0] - [(0 16; -8 0) • (-2 2; 0 0)] / [(-2 2; 0 0) • (-2 2; 0 0)] * [-2 2; 0 0]

3. Normalize V2 to obtain a unit vector.
  V2 = V2 / ||V2||, where ||V2|| represents the Frobenius norm of V2.

4. Subtract the projections of U3 onto V1 and V2 from U3 to obtain an orthogonal vector relative to V1 and V2.
  V3 = U3 - [(U3 • V1) / (V1 • V1) * V1] - [(U3 • V2) / (V2 • V2) * V2]

To find the values of a, b, c, and d in the orthogonal basis {V1, V2, V3}, calculate the values obtained in the above steps.

Note: The values of a, b, c, and d may vary depending on the calculations.

Learn more about Gram-Schmidt here:

https://brainly.com/question/30761089

#SPJ11

For 23: \( \cosh (ix) \) The real part is the cosh function evaluated at the imaginary part of the argument: \( \cosh (0) = 1 \) The imaginary part is the sinh function evaluated at the imaginary part of the argument: \( \sinh (0) = 0 \)

The absolute value is the magnitude of the complex number: \( |23| = \sqrt{1^2 + 0^2} = 1 \)  24: \( \cos (ix) \) The real part is the cos function evaluated at the imaginary part of the argument: \( \cos (0) = 1 \) The imaginary part is the sin function evaluated at the imaginary part of the argument: \( \sin (0) = 0 \)  The absolute value is the magnitude of the complex number: \( |24| = \sqrt{1^2 + 0^2} = 1 \)

For 25: \( \sin (x-iy) \) The real part is the sin function evaluated at the real part of the argument: \( \sin (x) \) The imaginary part is the negative of the sin function evaluated at the imaginary part of the argument: \( -\sin (-y) \)  The absolute value is the magnitude of the complex number: \( |25| = \sqrt{(\sin(x))^2 + (-\sin(-y))^2} \)

To know more about evaluated visit:

https://brainly.com/question/14677373

#SPJ11

23. Real part: [tex]\( \cos(23) \), Imaginary part: 0, Absolute value: \( | \cos(23) | \)[/tex]

24. Real part: [tex]\( \cosh(24) \), Imaginary part: 0, Absolute value: \( | \cosh(24) | \)[/tex]

25. Real part:[tex]\( \sin(x) \cosh(y) \), Imaginary part: \( \cos(x) \sinh(y) \),[/tex]

Absolute value: [tex]\( \sqrt{ (\sin(x) \cosh(y))^2 + (\cos(x) \sinh(y))^2 } \)[/tex]

26. Real part: [tex]\( \cosh(2) \cos(3) \), Imaginary part: \( \sinh(2) \sin(3) \),[/tex]

Absolute value:[tex]\( | \cosh(2) \cos(3) + \sinh(2) \sin(3)i | \)[/tex]

27. Real part: [tex]\( \sin(4) \cosh(3) \), Imaginary part: \( \cos(4) \sinh(3) \),[/tex]

Absolute value: [tex]\( \sqrt{ (\sin(4) \cosh(3))^2 + (\cos(4) \sinh(3))^2 } \)[/tex]

28. Real part:[tex]\( \tanh(1) \cos(\pi) \), Imaginary part: \( \sinh(1) \sin(\pi) \),[/tex]

Absolute value:[tex]\( | \tanh(1) \cos(\pi) + \sinh(1) \sin(\pi)i | \)[/tex]

To find the real part, imaginary part, and absolute value of the given expressions, let's evaluate them one by one:

23. The expression \( \cosh (i x) \) represents the hyperbolic cosine function of the imaginary number \( i x \). Since \( \cosh (ix) = \cos(x) \) for any real value of \( x \), the real part is \( \cos (23) \), the imaginary part is 0, and the absolute value is \( | \cos (23) | \).

24. The expression \( \cos (i x) \) represents the cosine function of the imaginary number \( i x \). Since \( \cos (ix) = \cosh(x) \) for any real value of \( x \), the real part is \( \cosh (24) \), the imaginary part is 0, and the absolute value is \( | \cosh (24) | \).

25. The expression \( \sin (x-i y) \) represents the sine function of the complex number \( x-i y \). The real part is \( \sin(x) \cosh(y) \), the imaginary part is \( \cos(x) \sinh(y) \), and the absolute value is \( \sqrt{ (\sin(x) \cosh(y))^2 + (\cos(x) \sinh(y))^2 } \).

26. The expression \( \cosh (2-3 i) \) represents the hyperbolic cosine function of the complex number \( 2-3i \). The real part is \( \cosh(2) \cos(3) \), the imaginary part is \( \sinh(2) \sin(3) \), and the absolute value is \( | \cosh(2) \cos(3) + \sinh(2) \sin(3)i | \).

27. The expression \( \sin (4+3i) \) represents the sine function of the complex number \( 4+3i \). The real part is \( \sin(4) \cosh(3) \), the imaginary part is \( \cos(4) \sinh(3) \), and the absolute value is \( \sqrt{ (\sin(4) \cosh(3))^2 + (\cos(4) \sinh(3))^2 } \).

28. The expression \( \tanh(1-i\pi) \) represents the hyperbolic tangent function of the complex number \( 1-i\pi \). The real part is \( \tanh(1) \cos(\pi) \), the imaginary part is \( \sinh(1) \sin(\pi) \), and the absolute value is \( | \tanh(1) \cos(\pi) + \sinh(1) \sin(\pi)i | \).

Learn more about Absolute value

https://brainly.com/question/12928519

#SPJ11

We can simply add w1​ and w2​ to the basis B to obtain an extended basis for V. Therefore, a basis for V consisting of elements in {w1​,w2​} is: {v1​, v2​, v3​, v4​, w1​, w2​}

First, let's write the vectors in S as column vectors:                                  

S = {[−2,−1,1],[1,0,1],[5,3,−4],[6,2,−1],[0,−1,3]}.                                               Next, we can construct a matrix A with the vectors in S as its columns:

A = [−2, 1, 5, 6, 0; −1, 0, 3, 2, −1; 1, 1, −4, −1, 3]

Now, we can perform row reduction on the matrix A to determine the linearly independent vectors. After row reduction, we obtain:

R = [1, 0, 3, 2, −1; 0, 1, −2, −3, 1; 0, 0, 0, 0, 0].                                                 Therefore, a basis for U consisting of elements in S is:
{[−2,−1,1],[1,0,1]}.

First, let's express the vectors w1​ and w2​ in terms of the basis B:

w1​ = v1​ + v2​ − v3​ + v4​ = (1)v1​ + (1)v2​ + (-1)v3​ + (1)v4​
w2​ = 2v1​ − 2v3​ + 2v4​ = (2)v1​ + (0)v2​ + (-2)v3​ + (2)v4​.                                

The coefficients of the basis vectors in the expressions for w1​ and w2​ give us the coordinates of w1​ and w2​ in the basis B.

The set {w1​,w2​} is linearly independent, which means that the vectors w1​ and w2​ are not linearly dependent on any other vectors in V. Therefore,

To know more about linearly visit:

brainly.com/question/32195047

#SPJ11

The answer based on the well-formed formulas (wffs)  is ,

(1)  (α∧β⇒γ)⇔(α∧∼γ⇒∼β) is a theorem. ,

(2) α⇒(β⇒(β⇒α)) is a theorem. ,

(3) α⇒(β⇔β) is a theorem. ,

(4) (α⇒(β⇔γ))⇔(α⇒(∼β⇔∼γ)) is a theorem.

To prove that each of the following well-formed formulas (wffs) is a theorem with a formal proof, follow  the proofs step-by-step:

1. (α∧β⇒γ)⇔(α∧∼γ⇒∼β)

  Proof:
  (α∧β⇒γ)⇔(α∧∼γ⇒∼β)
  ≡ (¬(α∧β)∨γ)⇔(¬(α∧∼γ)∨∼β)       (Implication equivalence)
  ≡ ((¬α∨¬β)∨γ)⇔((¬α∨γ)∨¬β)         (De Morgan's law)
  ≡ ((¬α∨¬β)∨γ)⇔(¬α∨(γ∨¬β))         (Associative law)
  ≡ ((¬α∨¬β)∨γ)⇔(¬α∨(¬β∨γ))         (Commutative law)
  ≡ ((¬α∨¬β)∨γ)⇔(¬α∨(γ∨¬β))         (Associative law)
  ≡ (¬(α∧β)∨γ)⇔(¬(α∧∼γ)∨∼β)       (De Morgan's law)
 
  Hence, (α∧β⇒γ)⇔(α∧∼γ⇒∼β) is a theorem.

2. α⇒(β⇒(β⇒α)):

 Proof:
  α⇒(β⇒(β⇒α))
  ≡ α⇒(β⇒(β→α))                  (Implication equivalence)
  ≡ α⇒(β⇒(¬β∨α))                (Implication equivalence)
  ≡ α⇒((¬β∨α)∨β)                (Implication equivalence)
  ≡ α⇒((¬β∨β)∨α)                (Commutative law)
  ≡ α⇒(T∨α)                    (Negation law)
  ≡ α⇒T                        (Domination law)
  ≡ T                           (Implication law)
 

  Hence, α⇒(β⇒(β⇒α)) is a theorem.

3. α⇒(β⇔β):

  Proof:
  α⇒(β⇔β)
  ≡ α⇒(β∧β)                (Biconditional equivalence)
  ≡ α⇒β                    (Idempotent law)

  Hence, α⇒(β⇔β) is a theorem.

4. (α⇒(β⇔γ))⇔(α⇒(∼β⇔∼γ)):

Proof:
  (α⇒(β⇔γ))⇔(α⇒(∼β⇔∼γ))
  ≡ (α⇒((β∧γ)∨(∼β∧∼γ)))⇔(α⇒((∼β∧∼γ)∨(β∧γ)))      (Biconditional equivalence)
  ≡ (α⇒((β∧γ)∨(∼β∧∼γ)))⇔(α⇒((β∧γ)∨(∼β∧∼γ)))      (Commutative law)
  ≡ T                                             (Implication law)

   Hence, (α⇒(β⇔γ))⇔(α⇒(∼β⇔∼γ)) is a theorem.

These are the formal proofs for each of the given wffs.

To know more about De Morgan's law visit:

https://brainly.com/question/29073742

#SPJ11

The statement is true. If the greatest common divisor (gcd) of the orders of two cyclic subgroups is 1, then their intersection is the identity element.

Let's assume that there exists an element x in the intersection of C₁ and C₂, which means x belongs to both C₁ and C₂. Since C₁ and C₂ are cyclic subgroups generated by elements a and b, respectively, we can express x as x = aᵢ = bⱼ, where i and j are positive integers.

Since a generates C₁, we can write aᵢ = aᵏ for some positive integer k. Similarly, b generates C₂, so we have bⱼ = bˡ for some positive integer l.

Substituting these expressions into x = aᵢ = bⱼ, we get aᵏ = bˡ. Rearranging this equation, we have aᵏ⋅bˡ⁻¹ = e, where e is the identity element.

Now, consider the order of the element x in C₁. By definition, the order of an element is the smallest positive integer k such that aᵏ = e. Similarly, the order of x in C₂ is the smallest positive integer l such that bˡ = e.

From the equation aᵏ⋅bˡ⁻¹ = e, we can see that aᵏ = bˡ⁻¹. Since the order of x in C₁ is k and the order of x in C₂ is l, it follows that k divides l. Similarly, l divides k.

However, if gcd(n, m) = 1, then the only positive integer that divides both n and m is 1. Therefore, the only possible value for k and l is 1, meaning x = a¹ = b¹ = e.

Thus, the intersection of C₁ and C₂ is the trivial subgroup consisting only of the identity element, as required.

Learn more about integers here: brainly.com/question/33503847

#SPJ11

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Yes it is a linear equation

        Hence, The Value of:  a^2   +   b^2   is  18

        b  =  1/a  =  1/ 2 + √5

        b  =  1/2 + √5  *   2 - √5/2 - √5

            =     2  - √5/1

        b  =  2  -  √5

       a^2    =  (2  +  √5)^2    =  4  +  4√5  +  5

       b^2    =  (2   -  √5)^2    =  4   -  4√5  +   5

        a^2   +  b^2   =   4  +  4√5  +  5  +  4  -  4√5  +  5

                              =   18  -  3√5

        4    +  5     +  4  +  5

        9    +   4     +   5

       13   +   5   =   18

        a^2  +  b^2       =   18                

        a^2  =  18   -  b^2

        a  =  ± √18  -  b^2

        a  =  √18     -  b^2

        a   =  -√18   -  b^2

        Hence, The Value of:  a^2   +   b^2   is  18

I hope this helps you!

According to the question Yes, The frequency distribution appears to follow a normal distribution. To assess normality, we typically examine the shape of the data using graphical methods.

To assess if a frequency distribution appears to have a normal distribution, let's consider an example of a temperature dataset.

Suppose we have collected temperature data for a city over a period of time and constructed a frequency distribution based on temperature ranges and their corresponding frequencies. The frequency distribution table shows the temperature ranges (x-axis) and the frequencies (y-axis), indicating how many times each temperature range occurred.

If the frequency distribution follows a normal distribution, we would expect to see a bell-shaped curve when we plot the data. The curve should have a symmetric shape, with the peak at the center of the distribution.

For example, let's say we have temperature ranges and frequencies as follows:

Temperature Range (°F): 50-55 55-60 60-65 65-70 70-75 75-80

Frequency: 8 20 35 45 32 12

To know more about normality visit -

brainly.com/question/16799894

#SPJ11

(a) These conditions are necessary because they guarantee that a solution satisfies the necessary conditions for optimality.

(b) To solve the problem using the KKT conditions, we need to find the values of xi and λ that satisfy the three KKT conditions.

To solve the problem using the KKT conditions, we need to find the values of xi and λ that satisfy the three KKT conditions. This involves setting up the Lagrangian function, differentiating it, and solving the resulting equations.

(a) The KKT (Karush-Kuhn-Tucker) conditions are necessary and sufficient for the optimality of solutions in constrained optimization problems. These conditions ensure that a candidate solution satisfies both the optimality and feasibility requirements.
The KKT conditions consist of three components:
1. Primal Feasibility: The primal feasibility condition ensures that the candidate solution satisfies all the constraints in the problem.
2. Dual Feasibility: The dual feasibility condition ensures that the Lagrange multipliers associated with each constraint are non-negative.
3. Complementary Slackness: The complementary slackness condition states that the product of the Lagrange multiplier and the slack variable (the difference between the actual value and the allowed value of a constraint) is zero for each constraint.
If any of the conditions are violated, the solution cannot be optimal.
Furthermore, the KKT conditions are sufficient because if a solution satisfies all three conditions, it is guaranteed to be optimal. This means that there are no other solutions that can improve the objective function value while still satisfying the constraints.

(b) To solve the given problem using the KKT conditions, we need to set up the Lagrangian function, which is the objective function plus the product of the Lagrange multipliers and the constraints.
The Lagrangian function for the given problem is:
L(x, λ) = ∑(i=1 to n) xi * ln(xi) + λ * (∑(i=1 to n) xi - 1)
To solve for the optimal solution, we need to find the values of xi and λ that satisfy the KKT conditions.
The KKT conditions for this problem are:
1. Primal Feasibility: ∑(i=1 to n) xi = 1
2. Dual Feasibility: λ ≥ 0
3. Complementary Slackness: λ * (∑(i=1 to n) xi - 1) = 0 and

xi * ln(xi) = 0 for all i.
To find the solution, we can differentiate the Lagrangian function with respect to xi and set it equal to zero:
∂L/∂xi = ln(xi) + 1 + λ

= 0
Solving this equation gives us xi = e^(-λ - 1).
Next, we substitute the value of xi into the constraint equation:
∑(i=1 to n) e^(-λ - 1) = 1
Now we solve for λ using this equation.
Finally, we substitute the value of λ back into xi = e^(-λ - 1) to find the optimal values of xi.
In conclusion, to solve the problem using the KKT conditions, we need to find the values of xi and λ that satisfy the three KKT conditions. This involves setting up the Lagrangian function, differentiating it, and solving the resulting equations.

To know more about Lagrangian, visit

https://brainly.com/question/33290992

#SPJ11

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

16/28

The answer is:

4/7

Work/explanation:

To find an equivalent fraction for 8/14, we will reduce it to its lowest terms, by dividing both its numerator and its denominator by 2:

[tex]\sf{\dfrac{8\div2}{14\div2}}[/tex]

[tex]\sf{\dfrac{4}{7}}[/tex]

Hence, a fraction equivalent to 8/14 is 4/7.

The thing to remember is that it's by far not the only option. In fact, there are infinite options. You can't divide anymore, but you can multiply 8/14 by 2, 3, 4, etc. As long as you multiply the numerator and the denominator by the same number, you'll get an equivalent fraction.

The initial value problem dy/dt = y(1 − y), y(0) = 1 is y = 1/(1 + e^(-t - C)), where C is undefined.

To solve the initial value problem dy/dt = y(1 − y), y(0) = 1, we can use separation of variables.

Rewrite the equation in the form dy/dt = f(t)g(y).
  In this case, f(t) = 1 and g(y) = y(1 − y).

Separate the variables by dividing both sides of the equation by g(y) and dt.
  The equation becomes (1/y(1 − y)) dy = dt.

Integrate both sides with respect to their respective variables.
  ∫(1/y(1 − y)) dy = ∫dt.

Step 4: Evaluate the integrals.
  The integral of (1/y(1 − y)) dy can be solved by partial fraction decomposition:
  (1/y(1 − y)) = A/y + B/(1 − y).

  Multiply both sides by y(1 − y) to get:
  1 = A(1 − y) + By.

  Setting y = 1, we get:
  1 = A(1 − 1) + B(1).

  Simplifying the equation, we find that A = 1.

  Setting y = 0, we get:
  1 = A(1) + B(0).

  Simplifying the equation, we find that A = 1.

  Therefore, A = 1 and B = 1.

  Substituting the values of A and B back into the partial fraction decomposition, we get:
  (1/y(1 − y)) = 1/y + 1/(1 − y).

  Now we can evaluate the integrals:
  ∫(1/y(1 − y)) dy = ∫(1/y + 1/(1 − y)) dy.

  The integral of 1/y with  respect to y is ln|y| + C1.

  The integral of 1/(1 − y) with respect to y is -ln|1 − y| + C2.

  Therefore, the integral of (1/y(1 − y)) dy is ln|y| - ln|1 − y| + C.

  The integral of dt with respect to t is t + C.

  So, the equation becomes ln|y| - ln|1 − y| = t + C.

Solve for y.
  Using the properties of logarithms, we can rewrite the equation as ln|y/(1 − y)| = t + C.

  Taking the exponential of both sides, we get:
  y/(1 − y) = e^(t + C).

  Multiplying both sides by (1 − y), we obtain:
  y = (1 − y)e^(t + C).

  Expanding the right side, we get:
  y = e^(t + C) - ye^(t + C).

  Rearranging the equation, we find:
  y + ye^(t + C) = e^(t + C).

  Factoring out y, we have:
  y(1 + e^(t + C)) = e^(t + C).

  Dividing both sides by (1 + e^(t + C)), we obtain:
  y = e^(t + C)/(1 + e^(t + C)).

  Simplifying the equation, we get:
  y = 1/(1 + e^(-t - C)).

Step 6: Apply the initial condition to find the value of the constant C.
  Since y(0) = 1, we can substitute t = 0 and y = 1 into the equation:
  1 = 1/(1 + e^(-0 - C)).

  Simplifying the equation, we find:
  1 = 1/(1 + e^(-C)).

  Multiplying both sides by (1 + e^(-C)), we get:
  1 + e^(-C) = 1.

  Subtracting 1 from both sides, we obtain:
  e^(-C) = 0.

  Since e^(-C) is always positive, there is no solution for e^(-C) = 0.

  Therefore, the constant C is undefined.

In conclusion, the solution to the initial value problem dy/dt = y(1 − y), y(0) = 1 is y = 1/(1 + e^(-t - C)), where C is undefined.

Learn more about integrals

brainly.com/question/31433890

#SPJ11

The sum of the series ∑n=1[infinity]​(4n^2 - 11) is infinite.

To find the sum of the series ∑n=1[infinity]​(4n^2 - 11), we can use the formula for the sum of a series of squares.
The formula is S = n(n+1)(2n+1)/6, where S represents the sum of the series and n is the number of terms.
In this case, n goes from 1 to infinity, so we need to find the limit of the sum as n approaches infinity.
Taking the limit as n approaches infinity, we can simplify the formula to S = lim(n→∞) n(n+1)(2n+1)/6.
Using the limit rules, we can expand the expression to S = lim(n→∞) (2n^3 + 3n^2 + n)/6.

To find the limit, we look at the term with the highest power of n, which is 2n^3.
As n approaches infinity, the term 2n^3 becomes dominant, and the other terms become insignificant in comparison.
Therefore, we can ignore the other terms and simplify the expression to S = lim(n→∞) 2n^3/6 = (1/3)lim(n→∞) n^3.
Taking the limit as n approaches infinity, we get S = (1/3)(∞^3) = ∞.
Thus, the sum of the series ∑n=1[infinity]​(4n^2 - 11) is infinite.

To know more about series visit:

brainly.com/question/31979719

#SPJ11