Question 3 of 10
Find tan 0

Answer:

3546 ft

Step-by-step explanation:

First find length of base to center of mountain.

(3150*sin 16 deg)/(sin 74 deg) = ~903 ft

Then dist of point from centre of mountain

903+725=1628 ft

Then cable length

(3150^2 + 1628^2)^0.5 = ~3546 ft

Answer:

75.36cm

Step-by-step explanation:

We use the pithagorean theorem: height^2 = 152^2 - 132^2 = 5680;

height = [tex]\sqrt{5680} = 75..36 cm[/tex]

Answer:

29/4

Step-by-step explanation:

2/4 is added per step

14 steps from 1/4

1/4 + 14.(2/4) = 29/4

Answer:

29 / 4 is the 15th term

simplified : 7 1/4

Step-by-step explanation:

3/4 - 1/4 = 2/4

5/4 - 3/4 = 2/4

7/4 - 5/4 = 2/4

. Use Arithmetic equation

a1 = 1/4

d= common difference = 2/4

a15 = a1 + (n-1) d

a15 = 1/4 + (15 - 1) 2/4

a15 = 1/4 + 14 (2/4)

a15 = 1/4 + 7

a15 = 29/4 or 7 1/4

Answer:

the explanation of wot

Step-by-step explanation:

If you give an explanation of something, you give details about it or describe it so that it can be understood.

If Selena ran x miles and manny ran y miles, who ran more miles

x=any number

y=any number smaller than x

Answer:

option C

Step-by-step explanation:

x + 5 ≤ 13

x + 5 - 5 ≤ 13 - 5

x = ≤ 8

Answer:

x  ≤  8

Step-by-step explanation:

Move all terms not containing  x to the right side of the inequality. Then solve for x. :)

Answer:

The answer is 13,200 feet.

Step-by-step explanation:

1 mile equals 5,280 feet, So all we have to do is multiply 5,280 by 2.5 miles.

5,280 * 2.5 = 13,200.

If you don't have a calculator you can multiply be splitting the parts.

5,280 * 2 = 10,560

+ 2,640 = 13,200

You get the 2,640 feet by dividing 5,280 by 2 because the 0.5 in 2.5 is half of a mile and 5,280 feet is a whole mile. Meaning that we have to cut the 5,280 in half to find the 0.5 in 2.5

Hope this helps! :)

૮ ・ﻌ・ა

Answer:

13200 feet. Guaranteed

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

check online for more information

Answer:

here's a photo of the calculator to that question

Answer:

4<×<6

Step-by-step explanation:

interval as an inequality

Answer:

x=3/2 Espero que esto te ayude

Answer:

x=3/2

hope this helps mate

Answer:

I believe the answer would be A. $200.00

Step-by-step explanation:

This is because if jay has 12 cars that he paid 3,500$ each for, the total cost would have been $42,000.

And the current price is 4,200$ for each car.

If you add 200$ to each 4,200$ car, you get 4,400$

After, you take the amount for each car (4,400) and multiply it by 12 (the amount of cars purchased) and you get 52,800.

You then need to subtract the recent cost of 12 cars (52,800) by 42,000$ (the original cost for 12 cars) and you will get $10,800.

52,800-42,000=10,800

therefore, A.$200.00 would be the correct answer

I'm not sure if all calculations are correct, but I hope this helps! :)

The average value of the cars must rise by $200 for the combined value of the 12 cars to be exactly $10,800 more than what Jay paid for them. Therefore, the correct answer is A. $200.00.

To find out how much more the average value of the cars must rise for the combined value to be $10,800 more than what Jay paid for them, we need to calculate the difference between the current combined value and the total price Jay paid, and then divide it by the number of cars.

Given:

Number of cars (n) = 12

Price Jay paid for each car (P) = $3,500

Current worth of each car (W) = $4,200

Total price Jay paid (T) = n * P = 12 * $3,500 = $42,000

Current combined value of the cars (C) = n * W = 12 * $4,200 = $50,400

Difference in value = C - T = $50,400 - $42,000 = $8,400

Additional increase needed = $10,800 - $8,400 = $2,400

To find the average increase needed per car, we divide the additional increase by the number of cars:

Average increase per car = Additional increase / Number of cars = $2,400 / 12 = $200

Therefore, the average value of the cars must rise by $200 for the combined value of the 12 cars to be exactly $10,800 more than what Jay paid for them.

The correct answer is A. $200.00.

To know more about average value, refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/32515383

#SPJ2

Answer: true you should run

Answer:

To go to (-7,0) on a graph on the x axis go to the left 7 times and plot your point

Step-by-step explanation:

[tex] \: \: \: \: [/tex]

[tex]\\ \sf{:}\dashrightarrow \dfrac{4}{x}=\dfrac{6}{9}[/tex]

[tex]\\ \sf{:}\dashrightarrow 6x=36[/tex]

[tex]\\ \sf{:}\dashrightarrow x=6[/tex]

#y

[tex]\\ \sf{:}\dashrightarrow \dfrac{y}{12}=\dfrac{12}{18}[/tex]

[tex]\\ \sf{:}\dashrightarrow \dfrac{y}{12}=\dfrac{2}{3}[/tex]

[tex]\\ \sf{:}\dashrightarrow 3y=24[/tex]

[tex]\\ \sf{:}\dashrightarrow y=8[/tex]

Here we go

And

Answer:

y=50

Step-by-step explanation:

[tex]\frac{1}{5}[/tex]y=10

 y=10÷[tex]\frac{1}{5}[/tex]

   =50

Answer:

5/253

Step-by-step explanation:

The first green is 7/23, the second is 6/22 and the red is 5/21. Multiply them together for 5/253.

Based on the definition of congruent triangles, the statements will be completed as follows:

Recall the following about Congruent Triangles:

Given that △CFE≅△PTR, thus:

Thus, based on the definition of congruent triangles, the statements will be completed as follows:

Learn more about congruent triangles on:]

https://brainly.com/question/8876876

Answer:

No. They are not equivalent.

Step-by-step explanation:

[tex]\frac{3}{5} \neq \frac{1}{2}[/tex]

=> [tex]\frac{6}{10} \neq \frac{5}{10}[/tex]

Therefore, 3/5 and 1/2 are not equivalent.

Hoped this helped.

Answer:

yes

Step-by-step explanation:

they are equivalent

Answer:

The answer is 16/10 or 1.6

Step-by-step explanation:

I'm guessing Scott bought 16 ton of rocks for this question since the question was written weirdly.

We know that Scott will share his 16 ton of rocks with 9 neighbors and himself.

Which means that the answer is 16/10 because Scott is gonna divide his 16 ton of rocks with 10 people. (9 neighbors and himself)

Hope this helps! :)

૮ ・ﻌ・ა

Explanation:

Each person is x years old. Adding those unknown ages gets us x+x = 2x

We can think of it like x being one box, so x+x represents having two boxes which shortens to 2x.

19 times Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

The required number of panels that were painted to be green is 19.

Joseph is going to paint the panels of a fence. He is going to use the same repeating pattern for the entire fence. The rule is "orange, yellow, pink, green, purple." If there are 98 panels in the fence, how many will be painted green is to be determined.

The process in mathematics to operate and interpret the function to make the function or expression simple or more understandable is called simplifying and the process is called simplification.

Here,
Pattern =  "orange, yellow, pink, green, purple."

                      1               2        3       4            5
Total number of panels = 98
Number of panels that were painted green,
= 98 / 5
= 19 + 3/5
In the 19 pattern, there are 19 panels that is green,
While in the remaining 3 panels consist of orange, yellow, and pink.

Thus, the required number of panels that were painted to be green is 19.

Learn more about simplification here:

https://brainly.com/question/12501526

#SPJ2

Answer:

I would remove 5 yellow tiles.

Step-by-step explanation:

If the beginning ratio was 6:15, I would start by finding the ratio of 1 red tile to ? yellow tiles. By multiplying 1 by 15, giving you 15, and dividing 15 by 6, I would find out that 1 red tile is equal to 2.5 yellow tiles. I would then set up an equation so there is 1/2.5 = 4/?, the 4 being the remaining red tiles after removing 2. I would then find the yellow tiles by multiplying whatever number the 1st numerator can be multiplied by to equal the 2nd numerator. Basically, I know that 1 multiplied by 4 is equal to 4, so I would multiply 2.5 by 4, which is equal to 10. Now that I know 4 red tiles is equal to 10 yellow tiles, I would remove 5 tiles to keep the ratio equivalent to 6:15

HOPE THIS HELPS :)

Answer:

im pretty sure its the routing number

Step-by-step explanation:

trust me

Answer:

x =1 if understood it correctly

Step-by-step explanation:

An actual two-by-two table is a tabular representation containing two rows and two columns.

Mathematically, the set-up of the two-by-two table for this data can be computed as:

Tested                  True Positive for cancer   True Negative    Total

Predicted Positive         800                            3200                 4000

Predicted Negative        100                            95900              96000

Total                                900                            99100              100000  

The prevalence rate of prostate cancer in this population is:

[tex]\mathbf{ =\dfrac{900}{100000}}[/tex]

[tex]\mathbf{ =\dfrac{9}{1000}}[/tex]

= 9 per thousand.

The calculation of the sensitivity of this screening is as follows:

[tex]\mathbf{=\dfrac{TP}{TP+PN_1}}[/tex]

where;

∴

[tex]\mathbf{=\dfrac{800}{800+100}}[/tex]

= 0.889

= 88.9%

The interpretation shows that 88.9% are correctly identified to be actual positive for prostate cancer.

The calculation of the specificity  of this screening is as follows:

[tex]\mathbf{=\dfrac{PN_2}{PN_2+TN}}[/tex]

where;

∴

[tex]\mathbf{=\dfrac{95900}{95900+3200}}[/tex]

= 0.9677

= 96.77%

The interpretation shows that 96.7% of an actual negative is correctly identified as such.

The positive predicted value of the screening test is computed as:

[tex]\mathbf{= \dfrac{TP}{TP + TN}}[/tex]

[tex]\mathbf{= \dfrac{800}{800 + 3200}}[/tex]

= 0.2

= 20%

The interpretation of the positive predicted value of this screening shows that 20% that are subjected to the diagnosis of positive prostate cancer truly have the disease.

Learn more about tabular representation here:

https://brainly.com/question/8307968