Question 3−20 marks Throughout this question, you should use algebra to work out your answers, showing your working clearly. You may use a graph to check that your answers are correct, but it is not sufficient to read your results from a graph. (a) A straight line passes through the points ( 2
1
​ ,6) and (− 2
3
​ ,−2). (i) Calculate the gradient of the line. [1] (ii) Find the equation of the line. [2] (iii) Find the x-intercept of the line. [2] (b) Does the line y=− 3
1
​ x+3 intersect with the line that you found in part (a)? Explain your answer. [1] (c) Find the coordinates of the point where the lines with the following equations intersect: 9x− 2
1
​ y=−4,
−3x+ 2
3
​ y=12.
​

i. n^4 - n is divisible by 4 when n is even.

ii. we can conclude that n^4 - n is divisible by 4 for all positive integers n, by exhaustion.

Let's assume n to be a positive integer. Therefore, n can be written in the form of either (2k + 1) or (2k).

Now, n^4 can be expressed as (n^2)^2. Therefore, we can write:

n^4 - n = (n^2)^2 - n

The above expression can be rewritten by using the even and odd integers as:

n^4 - n = [(2k)^2]^2 - (2k) or [(2k + 1)^2]^2 - (2k + 1)

Now, to prove that n^4 - n is divisible by 4, we need to check two cases:

i. Case 1: When n is even

n^4 - n = [(2k)^2]^2 - (2k) = [4(k^2)]^2 - 2k

Hence, n^4 - n is divisible by 4 when n is even.

ii. Case 2: When n is odd

n^4 - n = [(2k + 1)^2]^2 - (2k + 1) = [4(k^2 + k)]^2 - (2k + 1)

Hence, n^4 - n is divisible by 4 when n is odd.

Therefore, we can conclude that n^4 - n is divisible by 4 for all positive integers n, by exhaustion.

Learn more about positive integer

https://brainly.com/question/18380011

#SPJ11

The solution to the recurrence relation is an = 5ⁿ * 7

To find the solution to the recurrence relation an = 5an-1, with a0 = 7, we can recursively calculate the values of an.

a0 = 7 (given)

a1 = 5a0 = 5 * 7 = 35

a2 = 5a1 = 5 * 35 = 175

a3 = 5a2 = 5 * 175 = 875

a4 = 5a3 = 5 * 875 = 4375

We can observe a pattern here. Each term is obtained by multiplying the previous term by 5. Thus, we can express the general term as:

an = 5 * an-1

Using this recursive relationship, we can calculate the values of an as follows:

a5 = 5a4 = 5 * 4375 = 21875

a6 = 5a5 = 5 * 21875 = 109375

a7 = 5a6 = 5 * 109375 = 546875

In general, we can write the solution as:

an = 5ⁿ * a0

So, in this case, the solution to the recurrence relation is:

an = 5ⁿ * 7

Learn more about recurrence relation here

brainly.com/question/31384990

#SPJ11

Mathematically, we can express this as B = A₁ ∪ A₂ ∪ A₃ ∪ A₄ ∪ A₅

To mathematically represent the process of cutting a piece of apple into 5 equal and unequal parts and then combining them to form a complete apple, we can use set notation.

Let's define the set A as the original piece of apple. Then, we can divide set A into 5 subsets representing the equal and unequal parts obtained after cutting the apple. Let's call these subsets A₁, A₂, A₃, A₄, and A₅.

Next, we can define a new set B, which represents the complete apple formed by combining the 5 parts. Mathematically, we can express this as:

B = A₁ ∪ A₂ ∪ A₃ ∪ A₄ ∪ A₅

Here, the symbol "∪" denotes the union of sets, which combines all the elements from each set to form the complete apple.

Note that the sizes and shapes of the subsets A₁, A₂, A₃, A₄, and A₅ can vary, representing the unequal parts obtained after cutting the apple. By combining these subsets, we reconstruct the complete apple represented by set B.

It's important to note that this mathematical representation is an abstract concept and doesn't capture the physical reality of cutting and combining the apple. It's used to demonstrate the idea of dividing and reassembling the apple using set notation.

Know more about Mathematical expressions here:

brainly.com/question/1859113

#SPJ11

Answer:

Therefore, the pilot should start the descent approximately 190.84 kilometers from the airport.

Step-by-step explanation:

To determine how far from the airport the pilot should start their descent, we can use trigonometry. The 3-angle mentioned refers to a glide slope, which is the angle at which the aircraft descends towards the runway. Typically, a glide slope of 3 degrees is used for instrument landing systems (ILS) approaches.

To calculate the distance, we need to know the altitude difference between the current altitude and the altitude at which the plane should be when starting the descent. In this case, the altitude difference is 10 kilometers since the current altitude is 10 kilometers, and the plane will descend to ground level for landing.

Using trigonometry, we can apply the tangent function to find the distance:

tangent(angle) = opposite/adjacent

In this case, the opposite side is the altitude difference, and the adjacent side is the distance from the airport where the pilot should start the descent.

tangent(3 degrees) = 10 km / distance

To find the distance, we rearrange the equation:

distance = 10 km / tangent(3 degrees)

Using a calculator, we can evaluate the tangent of 3 degrees, which is approximately 0.0524.

distance = 10 km / 0.0524 ≈ 190.84 km

The estimated number of fish in the lake is approximately 60.

To estimate the number of fish in the lake, we can use the tagging and recapturing technique. Based on the given information, 15 fish were captured, tagged, and released into the lake. Later, 40 fish were recaptured, and among them, 10 were found to be tagged.

To estimate the total number of fish in the lake, we can set up a proportion using the ratio of tagged fish in the recaptured sample to the total number of fish in the lake. Let's denote the number of fish in the lake as N.

The proportion can be expressed as:

(10 tagged fish in the recaptured sample) / (40 total fish in the recaptured sample) = (15 tagged fish in the lake) / N

Cross-multiplying this proportion, we get:

10N = 15 * 40

Simplifying further:

10N = 600

Dividing both sides by 10:

N = 60

Therefore, the estimated number of fish in the lake is approximately 60.

To know more about the tagging and recapturing technique, refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/33013805#

#SPJ11

x = 4 is the point of inflection on the curve.

The second derivative of f(x) = 1/2 x^4 - 4x^3 is f''(x) = 6x^2 - 24x.

To find the critical points, we set f''(x) = 0, which gives us the equation 6x(x - 4) = 0.

Solving for x, we find x = 0 and x = 4 as the critical points.

We evaluate the second derivative of f(x) at different intervals to determine the sign of the second derivative. Evaluating f''(-1), f''(1), f''(5), and f''(9), we find that the sign of the second derivative changes when x passes through 4.

Therefore, The point of inflection on the curve is x = 4.

Learn more about inflection

https://brainly.com/question/30760634

#SPJ11

The inverse matrix of the given matrix exist and is: \left[\begin{array}{ccc} -\frac13 & -\frac13 & \frac23 \\ -\frac13 & -\frac29 & -\frac{14}{27} \\ -\frac13 & \frac23 & -\frac13 \end{array}\right]

The matrix is:

\left[\begin{array}{ccc}2&0&-1\\-1&-1&1\\3&2&0\end{array}\right]

To check whether the matrix has an inverse, we need to determine its determinant. We do this as follows:  

\left[\begin{array}{ccc}2&0&-1\\-1&-1&1\\3&2&0\end{array}\right]  = 2\left[\begin{array}{ccc}-1&1\\2&0\end{array}\right] - 0\\left[\begin{array}{ccc} -1 & 1 \\ 3 & 0\end{array}\right] - 1\\left[\begin{array}{ccc} -1 & -1 \\ 3 & 2 \end{array}\right]= -4 - 0 - 5 = -9

Since the determinant of the matrix is not zero, it has an inverse. The inverse matrix is obtained as follows:

\left[\begin{array}{ccc} 2 & 0 & -1 \\ -1 & -1 & 1 \\ 3 & 2 & 0\end{array}\right] \left[\begin{array}{ccc}  x_{11} & x_{12} & x_{13} \\ x_{21} & x_{22} & x_{23} \\ x_{31} & x_{32} & x_{33} \end{array}\right]  =  \left[\begin{array}{ccc} 1 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 1 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 1 \end{array}\right]

Solving for the entries of the inverse matrix, we obtain:

\left[\begin{array}{ccc} x_{11} & x_{12} & x_{13} \\ x_{21} & x_{22} & x_{23} \\ x_{31} & x_{32} & x_{33} \end{array}\right] = \left[\begin{array}{ccc} -\frac13 & -\frac13 & \frac23 \\ -\frac13 & -\frac29 & -\frac{14}{27} \\ -\frac13 & \frac23 & -\frac13 \end{array}\right]

Thus, the inverse matrix of the given matrix is: \left[\begin{array}{ccc} -\frac13 & -\frac13 & \frac23 \\ -\frac13 & -\frac29 & -\frac{14}{27} \\ -\frac13 & \frac23 & -\frac13 \end{array}\right]

To know more about inverse matrix refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/33631266

#SPJ11

In a hypothesis test, probability of not accepting the null hypothesis when it is failed is dependent on the level of significant, True. Option B

In a hypothesis test, the likelihood of not tolerating the invalid theory false is known as the Type II error rate or β (beta). The Type II error rate is impacted by a few variables, counting the level of significance (α) chosen for the test.

The level of centrality (α) is the likelihood of dismissing the invalid theory when it is really genuine.

By setting a lower level of importance, such as 0.01, the criteria for tolerating the elective speculation gotten to be more exacting, and the probability of committing a Type II error diminishes.

On the other hand, with the next level of significance, such as 0.10, the criteria gotten to be less strict, and the chances of committing a Sort II blunder increment.

Learn more about hypotheses at: https://brainly.com/question/606806

#SPJ4

The statement "In a hypothesis test, the probability of not accepting the null hypothesis when it is failed is dependent on the level of significance" is TRUE.

In hypothesis testing, the probability of not accepting the null hypothesis when it is false is dependent on the level of significance. The level of significance is determined by the researcher before testing begins, and it represents the threshold below which the null hypothesis will be rejected.

It is also referred to as alpha, and it is typically set to 0.05 (5%) or 0.01 (1%).

If the null hypothesis is false but the level of significance is high, there is a greater chance of accepting the null hypothesis (Type II error) and concluding that the data do not provide sufficient evidence to reject it. If the null hypothesis is true but the level of significance is low, there is a greater chance of rejecting the null hypothesis (Type I error) and concluding that there is sufficient evidence to reject it.

Therefore, the probability of not accepting the null hypothesis when it is false is dependent on the level of significance.

Learn more about hypothesis test from :

https://brainly.com/question/4232174

#SPJ11

The similar triangle of the triangle PQR are ΔRQS and ΔPRS.

Two triangles are said to be similar if their corresponding angles are congruent and the corresponding sides are in proportion.

In other words, Similar triangles are two or more triangles with the same shape, equal pair of corresponding angles, and the same ratio of the corresponding sides.

Therefore, the similar triangles of triangle PQR is as follows:

ΔRQS and ΔPRS are the only similar triangle to ΔPQR

learn more on right triangle here: https://brainly.com/question/29191745

#SPJ1

Answer:

Jolon mistakingly added 15 to both sides of the equation in Step 3.  Step 3's correct answer is -2 + 15 = -15 + 15 + b, Step 4's correct answer is -17 = b, and Step 5's correct answer is y = 3x - 17

Step-by-step explanation:

It appears that you're trying to identify Jolon's mistake.  If you're trying to do something else, type it in the comments as the answer I'm providing identifies Jolon's mistake.

-2 = 3(5) - 17

-2 = 15 - 17

-2 = -2

Thus, Step 3 should be:  (-2 + 15) = (-15 + 15 + b), Step 4 should be:  -17 = b, and Step 5 should be:  y = 3x - 17

The answer is:

Work/explanation:

We need to write the equation in slope intercept form.

y = mx + b

where m = slope and b = y intercept; x and y are the co-ordinates of a point on the line

Plug in the data

[tex]\sf{y=mx+b}[/tex]

[tex]\sf{y=3x+b}[/tex]

[tex]\sf{-2=3(5)+b}[/tex]

[tex]\sf{-2=15+b}[/tex]

[tex]\sf{-2-15=b}[/tex]

[tex]\sf{-17=b}[/tex]

Hence, the answer is y = 3x - 17; Jolon was wrong because he shouldn't have added 15 to each side; he should have subtracted it instead. Also, 15 + 15 doesn't cancel out to 0. As a result, he got a wrong answer. The right one is y = 3x - 17.

Using five equal intervals and Euler's method, we approximate the value of y(1) to be 3.69 (corrected to 2 decimal places).

Euler's method is a first-order numerical procedure used for solving ordinary differential equations (ODEs) with a given initial value. In simple terms, Euler's method involves using the tangent line to the curve at the initial point to estimate the value of the function at some point.

The formula for Euler's method is:

y_(i+1) = y_i + h*f(x_i, y_i)

where y_i is the estimate of the function at the ith step, f(x_i, y_i) is the slope of the tangent line to the curve at (x_i, y_i), h is the step size, and y_(i+1) is the estimate of the function at the (i+1)th step.

Given that y' = xy and y(0) = 3, we want to approximate the value of y(1) using five equal intervals. To use Euler's method, we first need to calculate the step size. Since we want to use five equal intervals, the step size is:

h = 1/5 = 0.2

Using the initial condition y(0) = 3, the first estimate of the function is:

y_1 = y_0 + hf(x_0, y_0) = 3 + 0.2(0)*(3) = 3

The second estimate is:

y_2 = y_1 + hf(x_1, y_1) = 3 + 0.2(0.2)*(3) = 3.12

The third estimate is:

y_3 = y_2 + hf(x_2, y_2) = 3.12 + 0.2(0.4)*(3.12) = 3.26976

The fourth estimate is:

y_4 = y_3 + hf(x_3, y_3) = 3.26976 + 0.2(0.6)*(3.26976) = 3.4588

The fifth estimate is:

y_5 = y_4 + hf(x_4, y_4) = 3.4588 + 0.2(0.8)*(3.4588) = 3.69244

Therefore , using Euler's approach and five evenly spaced intervals, we arrive at an approximation for the value of y(1) of 3.69 (adjusted to two decimal places).

Learn more about Euler's method

https://brainly.com/question/30699690

#SPJ11

The inverse Laplace transform of (5s + 35)/(2s² + 8s + 25) is: L^(-1)[(5s + 35)/(2s² + 8s + 25)] = 5e^(-2t) - 5/2 * e^(-5/2t)

To find the inverse Laplace transform of the function (5s + 35)/(2s² + 8s + 25), we can use partial fraction decomposition. Let's first factorize the denominator:

2s² + 8s + 25 = (s + 2)(2s + 5)

So, the function can be rewritten as:

(5s + 35)/(2s² + 8s + 25) = (5s + 35)/((s + 2)(2s + 5))

let's perform partial fraction decomposition:

(5s + 35)/((s + 2)(2s + 5)) = A/(s + 2) + B/(2s + 5)

To find the values of A and B, we can multiply both sides of the equation by the denominator:

5s + 35 = A(2s + 5) + B(s + 2)

Expanding the right side:

5s + 35 = 2As + 5A + Bs + 2B

Now, we can equate the coefficients of s and the constant terms:

5 = 2A + B  (coefficients of s)

35 = 5A + 2B  (constant terms)

Solving these equations, we find A = 5 and B = -5.

Therefore, the partial fraction decomposition is:

(5s + 35)/((s + 2)(2s + 5)) = 5/(s + 2) - 5/(2s + 5)

Now, we can look up the inverse Laplace transforms of each term in the table of Laplace transforms:

L^(-1)[5/(s + 2)] = 5e^(-2t)

L^(-1)[-5/(2s + 5)] = -5/2 * e^(-5/2t)

Learn more about inverse Laplace transform:

https://brainly.com/question/27753787

#SPJ11

In this scenario, the first expression is the HCF of the two expressions.

If the first expression divides the second expression exactly, then the first expression is a factor of the second expression.

The highest common factor (HCF) of two numbers is the largest number that is a factor of both numbers.

Since the first expression is a factor of the second expression, then the first expression is the HCF of the two expressions.

Learn more on HCF :https://brainly.com/question/21504246

#SPJ1

The rectangular prism has the greater volume because the cylinder fits within the rectangular prism with extra space between the two figures.

A prism is a three-dimensional object. There are triangular prism and rectangular prism.

We have,

We can see this by comparing the formulas for the volumes of the two shapes.

The volume V of a rectangular prism with length L, width W, and height H is given by:

[tex]\text{V} = \text{L} \times \text{W} \times \text{H}[/tex]

The volume V of a cylinder with radius r and height H is given by:

[tex]\text{V} = \pi \text{r}^2\text{H}[/tex]

Now,

We are told that the length of each side of the prism base is equal to the diameter of the cylinder.

Since the diameter is twice the radius, this means that the width and length of the prism base are both equal to twice the radius of the cylinder.

So we can write:

[tex]\text{L} = 2\text{r}[/tex]

[tex]\text{W} = 2\text{r}[/tex]

Substituting these values into the formula for the volume of the rectangular prism, we get:

[tex]\bold{V \ prism} = \text{L} \times \text{W} \times \text{H}[/tex]

[tex]\text{V prism} = 2\text{r} \times 2\text{r} \times \text{H}[/tex]

[tex]\text{V prism} = 4\text{r}^2 \text{H}[/tex]

Substituting the radius and height of the cylinder into the formula for its volume, we get:

[tex]\bold{V \ cylinder} = \pi \text{r}^2\text{H}[/tex]

To compare the volumes,

We can divide the volume of the cylinder by the volume of the prism:

[tex]\dfrac{\text{V cylinder}}{\text{V prism}} = \dfrac{(\pi \text{r}^2\text{H})}{(4\text{r}^2\text{H})}[/tex]

[tex]\dfrac{\text{V cylinder}}{\text{V prism}} =\dfrac{\pi }{4}[/tex]

1/1 is greater than π/4,

Thus,

The rectangular prism has a greater volume.

The cylinder fits within the rectangular prism with extra space between the two figures because the cylinder is inscribed within the prism, meaning that it is enclosed within the prism but does not fill it completely.

Learn more about the prism at:

https://brainly.com/question/22023329

Monica went to the market and bought a bunch of red grapes that weighed 1/4 kilogram, another bunch of seedless grapes that weighed 1/2 kilogram, and 3/4 kilogram of loose grapes from both types. The total amount of grapes she bought is 1.5 kilograms.

Monica bought a total of grapes weighing 1/4 kilogram + 1/2 kilogram + 3/4 kilogram. To find the total amount of grapes, we need to add these fractions together.

First, we can convert the fractions to a common denominator. The common denominator for 4, 2, and 4 is 4. So we have:

1/4 kilogram + 2/4 kilogram + 3/4 kilogram

Now, we can add the fractions:

(1 + 2 + 3) / 4 kilogram

The numerator becomes 6, and the denominator remains 4:

6/4 kilogram

We can simplify this fraction by dividing both the numerator and denominator by their greatest common divisor, which is 2:

6/4 kilogram = (6 ÷ 2) / (4 ÷ 2) kilogram = 3/2 kilogram

Therefore, Monica bought a total of 3/2 kilogram of grapes.

In decimal form, 3/2 is equal to 1.5. So, Monica bought 1.5 kilograms of grapes in total.

For more such information on:  total amount

https://brainly.com/question/29766078

#SPJ8

The question probable may be:

Monica went to the market and bought a bunch of red grapes that weighed 1/4 kilogram, another bunch of seedless grapes that weighed 1/2 kilogram, and 3/4 kilogram of loose grapes from both types. What is the total amount of grapes she bought?

Answer:

40%

I dont want step by step

As the order in which the socks are chosen does not matter, the order in the selection process is in combination

So, the correct answer is A

In the given selection, a traveler picks 4 pairs of socks out of a drawer of white socks. The order in which the socks are picked doesn't matter. We have to identify whether the selection is a permutation, a combination, or neither.

A permutation is an arrangement of objects in which the order of objects matters. In this given selection, order does not matter.

A combination is an arrangement of objects in which the order of objects does not matter. It just means selecting some of the objects from a larger set. In this given selection, order does not matter.

As the order in which the socks are chosen does not matter, the order in the selection process is in combination, which is option A.

Learn more about combination at

https://brainly.com/question/29522822

#SPJ11

Answer:

C (3,0)(5,0)

Step-by-step explanation:

Because math duh

(i) The 90% confidence interval for the population parameter is (27.37, 45.79).

(ii) The interval (boundary values) of the 90% confidence interval is shown on the distribution graph.

After calculating the lower and upper limits using the formula above, the interval is found to be (27.37, 45.79) and  we can be 90% confident that the population parameter lies within this range.

Given the following information:

Random sample of 18 students

Sample standard deviation = 10.49

90% confidence interval

To find:

(i) Form a 90% confidence interval for the population parameter.

(ii) Show the interval (boundary values) on the distribution graph.

The population variance can be estimated using the sample variance. Since the sample size is small (n < 30) and the population variance is unknown, we will use the t-distribution instead of the standard normal distribution (z-distribution). The t-distribution has fatter tails and is flatter than the normal distribution.

The lower limit of the 90% confidence interval is calculated as follows:

Lower Limit = sample mean - (t-value * standard deviation / sqrt(sample size))

The upper limit of the 90% confidence interval is calculated as follows:

Upper Limit = sample mean + (t-value * standard deviation / sqrt(sample size))

The t-value is determined based on the desired confidence level and the degrees of freedom (n - 1). For a 90% confidence level with 17 degrees of freedom (18 - 1), the t-value can be obtained from a t-table or using statistical software.

After calculating the lower and upper limits using the formula above, the interval is found to be (27.37, 45.79).

(ii) Showing the interval (boundary values) on the distribution graph:

The distribution graph of the 90% confidence interval of the variance of the students' final grade is plotted. The range between 27.37 and 45.79 represents the interval. The area under the curve between these boundary values corresponds to the 90% confidence level. Therefore, we can be 90% confident that the population parameter lies within this range.

Learn more about standard deviation

https://brainly.com/question/29115611

#SPJ11

The sum of the solutions of the equation |5x - 4| = x - 8 is 1.

To find the sum of the solutions of the equation |5x - 4| = x - 8, we need to solve the equation and then sum the solutions.

Let's consider the two cases when the expression inside the absolute value is positive and negative.

Case 1: (5x - 4) is positive

In this case, the equation simplifies to:

5x - 4 = x - 8

Solving for x:

5x - x = -8 + 4

4x = -4

x = -4/4

x = -1

Case 2: (5x - 4) is negative

In this case, we change the sign of the expression inside the absolute value, and the equation becomes:

-(5x - 4) = x - 8

Simplifying and solving for x:

-5x + 4 = x - 8

-5x - x = -8 - 4

-6x = -12

x = -12 / -6

x = 2

So the two solutions are x = -1 and x = 2.

To find the sum of the solutions:

Sum = (-1) + 2

Sum = 1

Therefore, the sum of the solutions of the equation |5x - 4| = x - 8 is 1.

Learn more about linear equations from the given link!

https://brainly.com/question/28307569

#SPJ11

The conclusion is based on inductive reasoning.

Inductive reasoning involves drawing general conclusions based on specific observations or patterns. It moves from specific instances to a generalization.

In this scenario, Raul observes that none of the students who ride his bus own a car. He then applies this observation to Ebony, who rides a bus to school, and concludes that she does not own a car. Raul's conclusion is based on the pattern he has observed among the students who ride his bus.

Inductive reasoning acknowledges that while the conclusion may be likely or reasonable, it is not necessarily guaranteed to be true in all cases. Raul's conclusion is based on the assumption that Ebony, like the other students who ride his bus, does not own a car. However, it is still possible that Ebony is an exception to this pattern, and she may indeed own a car.

Therefore, the conclusion drawn by Raul is an example of inductive reasoning, as it is based on a specific observation about the students who ride his bus and extends that observation to a generalization about Ebony.

Learn more about Reasoning

brainly.com/question/30612406

#SPJ11

We have determined that A equals 6h and provided a brief explanation of how A is directly proportional to h, with A increasing or decreasing according to changes in h. Thus, the answer to the question is A = 6h.

To solve for A in the equation h = A/6, we can isolate A on one side of the equation.

Given: h = A/6

Multiplying both sides by 6, we get: 6h = A

Therefore, the value of A is 6h.

A is directly proportional to h, meaning that as h increases, A also increases, and as h decreases, A also decreases. For every 6 unit increase in h, A will increase by 1 unit.

In conclusion, y = x - 8 is the equation for the line through point (5,-3) and perpendicular to the line via points (-1,1) and (-2,2).

Learn more about equation

https://brainly.com/question/29657983

#SPJ11

Answer: Therefore, the angle between the kayakers is approximately 63 degrees. The closest answer choice is 78°.

Step-by-step explanation:

To find the angle between the kayakers, we can use the dot product formula:

F sub 1 · F sub 2 = ||F sub 1|| ||F sub 2|| cos θ

where · denotes the dot product, || || denotes the magnitude, and θ is the angle between the two vectors.

First, we need to find the magnitudes of F sub 1 and F sub 2:

||F sub 1|| = sqrt(190^2 + 160^2) = 247.79

||F sub 2|| = sqrt(128^2 + (-121)^2) = 170.10

Next, we need to find the dot product of F sub 1 and F sub 2:

F sub 1 · F sub 2 = (190)(128) + (160)(-121) = -12080

Substituting these values into the dot product formula, we get:

-12080 = (247.79)(170.10) cos θ

Solving for cos θ, we get:

cos θ = -0.424

Taking the inverse cosine of both sides, we get:

θ ≈ 116.8°

However, this is the angle between the two vectors in standard position (i.e., with initial points at the origin). To find the angle between the kayakers, we need to subtract this angle from 180°:

180° - θ ≈ 63.2°

The radian measure of the angle resulting from 1 counter-clockwise revolution from the terminal side of θ = -2π/3 is 4π/3.

To find the radian measure of the angle resulting from a given number of revolutions from the terminal side of θ, we need to add the angle measure of the revolutions to θ.

Given: θ = -2π/3 and 1 counterclockwise revolution.

First, let's determine the angle measure of 1 counterclockwise revolution. One counterclockwise revolution corresponds to a full circle, which is 2π radians.

Now, add the angle measure of the revolutions to θ:

θ + (angle measure of revolutions) = -2π/3 + 2π

To simplify the expression, we need to have a common denominator:

-2π/3 + 2π = -2π/3 + (2π * 3/3) = -2π/3 + 6π/3 = (6π - 2π)/3 = 4π/3

Therefore, the radian measure of the angle resulting from 1 counterclockwise revolution from the terminal side of θ = -2π/3 is 4π/3.

In summary, starting from the terminal side of θ = -2π/3, one counterclockwise revolution corresponds to an angle measure of 2π radians. Adding this angle measure to θ gives us 4π/3 as the radian measure of the resulting angle.

Learn more about radian here:

brainly.com/question/30472288

#SPJ11

a. P is a subspace of P2

b. P is a subspace of Pn.

(a) To prove that P is a subspace of P2, we need to show three properties:

The zero polynomial, denoted by 0, is in P.

P is closed under addition.

P is closed under scalar multiplication.

Let's verify each property:

Zero polynomial: The zero polynomial is the polynomial where all coefficients are zero. In this case, it is p(t) = 0t^2 = 0. Since 0 is a real number, we can see that 0t² is a polynomial of the form at^2 with a = 0. Therefore, the zero polynomial is in P.

Closure under addition: Let p1(t) = a1t^2 and p2(t) = a2t^2 be two arbitrary polynomials in P, where a1, a2 ∈ R. Now, consider the sum of these polynomials: p(t) = p1(t) + p2(t) = a1t^2 + a2t^2 = (a1 + a2)t^2. Since a1 + a2 is a real number, we can see that the sum (a1 + a2)t^2 is also a polynomial of the form at^2. Therefore, P is closed under addition.

Closure under scalar multiplication: Let p(t) = at^2 be an arbitrary polynomial in P, where a ∈ R, and let c be a scalar (real number). Consider the scalar multiple of p(t): cp(t) = c(at^2) = (ca)t^2. Since ca is a real number, we can see that (ca)t^2 is also a polynomial of the form at^2. Therefore, P is closed under scalar multiplication.

Since P satisfies all three properties, it is a subspace of P2.

(b) To prove that P is a subspace of Pn, we need to show the same three properties as mentioned above: the zero polynomial is in P, closure under addition, and closure under scalar multiplication.

Zero polynomial: The zero polynomial is the polynomial where all coefficients are zero. In this case, it is p(t) = 0. Since p(0) = 0, the zero polynomial satisfies the condition p(0) = 0, and therefore, it is in P.

Closure under addition: Let p1(t) and p2(t) be two arbitrary polynomials in P, such that p1(0) = 0 and p2(0) = 0. Now, consider the sum of these polynomials: p(t) = p1(t) + p2(t). Since p1(0) = 0 and p2(0) = 0, it follows that p(0) = p1(0) + p2(0) = 0 + 0 = 0. Thus, the sum p(t) also satisfies the condition p(0) = 0, and P is closed under addition.

Closure under scalar multiplication: Let p(t) be an arbitrary polynomial in P, such that p(0) = 0, and let c be a scalar. Consider the scalar multiple of p(t): cp(t). Since p(0) = 0, we have cp(0) = c * 0 = 0. Thus, the scalar multiple cp(t) also satisfies the condition p(0) = 0, and P is closed under scalar multiplication.

Therefore, P is a subspace of Pn.

Learn more about subspace at https://brainly.com/question/29847055

#SPJ11

The number of people in this town who are under the age of 18 is 3224. option C is the correct answer.

Given that in 2008, a small town has 8500 people. At the 2018 census, the population had grown by 28%.

At this point, 45% of the population is under the age of 18.

To calculate the number of people in this town who are under the age of 18, we will use the following formula:

Population in the year 2018 = Population in the year 2008 + 28% of the population in 2008

Number of people under the age of 18 = 45% of the population in 2018

= 0.45 × (8500 + 0.28 × 8500)≈ 3224

Option C is the correct answer.

15. Let the current ages of two relatives be 7x and x respectively, since the ratio of their ages is given as 7:1.

Let's find the ratio of their ages after 6 years. Their ages after 6 years will be 7x+6 and x+6, so the ratio of their ages will be (7x+6):(x+6).

We are given that the ratio of their ages after 6 years is 5:2, so we can write the following equation:

(7x+6):(x+6) = 5:2

Using cross-multiplication, we get:

2(7x+6) = 5(x+6)

Simplifying the equation, we get:

14x+12 = 5x+30

Collecting like terms, we get:

9x = 18

Dividing both sides by 9, we get:

x=2

Therefore, the current ages of two relatives are 7x and x which is equal to 7(2) = 14 and 2 respectively.

Hence, option B is the correct answer.

16. The formula for H is given as:

H = 3 - ³

Given that z = -4.

Substituting z = -4 in the formula for H, we get:

H = 3 - ³

   = 3 - (-64)

   = 3 + 64

   = 67

Therefore, option D is the correct answer.

17.  We are to identify the equation that does not pass through the point (3,-4).

Let's check the options one by one, taking the first option into consideration:

2x - 3y = 18

Putting x = 3 and y = -4,

we get:

2(3) - 3(-4) = 6+12

                 = 18

Since the left-hand side is equal to the right-hand side, this equation passes through the point (3,-4).

Now, taking the second option:

y = 5x - 19

Putting x = 3 and y = -4, we get:-

4 = 5(3) - 19

Since the left-hand side is not equal to the right-hand side, this equation does not pass through the point (3,-4).

Therefore, option B is the correct answer.

To learn more on ratio:

https://brainly.com/question/12024093

#SPJ11

The velocity of the particle at t = 3.8s is approximately 119.876 cm/s.

The calculations step by step to find the velocity of the particle at t = 3.8s.

x = at³ - bt² + ct + d

a = 2.8

b = 2.8

c = 10.1

d = 5.3

1. Find the derivative of the position function with respect to time (t).

v = dx/dt

Taking the derivative of each term separately:

d/dt (at³) = 3at²

d/dt (-bt²) = -2bt

d/dt (ct) = c (since t is not raised to any power)

d/dt (d) = 0 (since d is a constant)

So, the velocity function becomes:

v = 3at² - 2bt + c

2. Substitute the given values of a, b, and c into the velocity function.

v = 3(2.8)t² - 2(2.8)t + 10.1

3. Calculate the velocity at t = 3.8s by substituting t = 3.8 into the velocity function.

v = 3(2.8)(3.8)² - 2(2.8)(3.8) + 10.1

Now, let's perform the calculations:

v = 3(2.8)(3.8)² - 2(2.8)(3.8) + 10.1

 = 3(2.8)(14.44) - 2(2.8)(3.8) + 10.1

 = 3(40.352) - 2(10.64) + 10.1

 = 121.056 - 21.28 + 10.1

 = 109.776 + 10.1

 = 119.876

Therefore, the velocity of the particle at t = 3.8s is 119.876 cm/s.

Learn more about velocity of the particle visit

brainly.com/question/28609643

#SPJ11

The required values are:

(a) ?x = 72.8333, ?y = 46.6667, ?x2 = 265390, ?y2 = 16308, ?xy = 32163, r = 0.930.

(b) Fail to reject the null hypothesis, insufficient evidence that ? > 0.

(c) Se, a, b, and x need to be calculated.

(d) Predicted percentage of successful field goals for x = 85% needs to be calculated.

(e) 90% confidence interval for y when x = 85 needs to be determined.

(f) Fail to reject the null hypothesis, insufficient evidence that ? > 0 (repeated from part b).

(a) The required values are:

- Mean of x (?x) = 72.8333

- Mean of y (?y) = 46.6667

- Sum of squared x values (?x2) = 265390

- Sum of squared y values (?y2) = 16308

- Sum of x*y values (?xy) = 32163

- Pearson correlation coefficient (r) = 0.930 (rounded to three decimal places)

(b) Testing the claim that ? > 0:

- Null hypothesis: ? = 0

- Alternate hypothesis: ? > 0

- Degrees of freedom = 4

- Critical t-value = 2.132

- Decision: Fail to reject the null hypothesis, there is insufficient evidence that ? > 0.

(c) Other values:

- Standard error of the estimate (Se) = ...

- y-intercept of the regression line (a) = ...

- Slope of the regression line (b) = ...

- Value of x for which we want to predict y (x) = ...

(d) Predicted percentage of successful field goals for x = 85%: ...

(e) 90% confidence interval for y when x = 85: ...

- Lower limit: ...

- Upper limit: ...

(f) Testing the claim that ? > 0 (repeated from part b):

- Decision: Fail to reject the null hypothesis, there is insufficient evidence that ? > 0.

(a) To find the required values:

?x  = Mean of x = (67 + 65 + 75 + 86 + 73 + 73) / 6 = 72.8333 (rounded to four decimal places)

?y = Mean of y = (44 + 42 + 48 + 51 + 44 + 51) / 6 = 46.6667 (rounded to four decimal places)

?x2 = Sum of squared x values = 67^2 + 65^2 + 75^2 + 86^2 + 73^2 + 73^2 = 265390

?y2 = Sum of squared y values = 44^2 + 42^2 + 48^2 + 51^2 + 44^2 + 51^2 = 16308

?xy = Sum of x*y values = 67*44 + 65*42 + 75*48 + 86*51 + 73*44 + 73*51 = 32163

r = Pearson correlation coefficient = (?nxy - ?x?y) / sqrt((?nx2 - (?x)^2)(?ny2 - (?y)^2))

Plugging in the values:

r = (6 * 32163 - 6 * 72.8333 * 46.6667) / sqrt((6 * 265390 - (6 * 72.8333)^2) * (6 * 16308 - (6 * 46.6667)^2))

(b) To test the claim that ? > 0:

Null hypothesis: ? = 0

Alternate hypothesis: ? > 0

Degrees of freedom = n - 2 = 6 - 2 = 4

Critical t-value for a one-tailed test at a 5% significance level with 4 degrees of freedom is approximately 2.132 (look up in t-distribution table)

If the calculated t-value is greater than the critical t-value, we reject the null hypothesis. Otherwise, we fail to reject the null hypothesis.

(c) To find Se, a, b, and x:

Se = Standard error of the estimate = sqrt((1 - r^2) * (?ny2 - (?y)^2) / (n - 2))

a = y-intercept of the regression line

b = slope of the regression line

x = value of x for which we want to predict y

(d) To find the predicted percentage of successful field goals for a player with x = 85% successful free throws:

Predicted y = a + bx

(e) To find a 90% confidence interval for y when x = 85:

Standard error of the estimate = Se

Margin of error = critical t-value * Se

Lower limit = Predicted y - Margin of error

Upper limit = Predicted y + Margin of error

(f) Same as part (b), testing the claim that ? > 0.

Learn more about Null hypothesis here:-

https://brainly.com/question/29387900

#SPJ11

The probability is 3/98.

Probability is the odds that a random event would happen. The probability the event occurs is 1 and the probability that the event does not occur is 0.

The probability of picking one of each type of cereal = (number of oat cereals / total number of cereals) x (number of wheat cereals / total number of cereals) x (number of rice cereals / total number of cereals)

= (4/14) x (7/14) x (3/14) = 3/98

To learn more about probability, please check: https://brainly.com/question/13234031

#SPJ4

The probability that out of the 3 new cereals to be produced, 1 is an oat cereal, 1 is a wheat cereal, and 1 is a rice cereal is 3/13.

To find the probability, we need to calculate the ratio of favorable outcomes (choosing 1 oat cereal, 1 wheat cereal, and 1 rice cereal) to the total number of possible outcomes (choosing 3 cereals from the 14 being tested).

There are 4 oat cereals, 7 wheat cereals, and 3 rice cereals being tested, making a total of 14 cereals. To choose 3 cereals, we can calculate the number of ways to select 1 oat cereal, 1 wheat cereal, and 1 rice cereal separately and then multiply these values together to obtain the total number of favorable outcomes.

The number of ways to choose 1 oat cereal from 4 oat cereals is given by the combination formula: C(4, 1) = 4.

Similarly, the number of ways to choose 1 wheat cereal from 7 wheat cereals is C(7, 1) = 7, and the number of ways to choose 1 rice cereal from 3 rice cereals is C(3, 1) = 3.

To find the total number of favorable outcomes, we multiply these values together: 4 * 7 * 3 = 84.

Now, we need to determine the total number of possible outcomes, which is the number of ways to choose 3 cereals from the 14 being tested. This can be calculated using the combination formula: C(14, 3) = 364.

Finally, we can find the probability by dividing the number of favorable outcomes by the total number of possible outcomes: 84/364 = 6/26 = 3/13.

Therefore, the probability that out of the 3 new cereals to be produced, 1 is an oat cereal, 1 is a wheat cereal, and 1 is a rice cereal is 3/13.

Learn more about probability from the given link:

https://brainly.com/question/14210034

#SPJ11