To prove that \(\bar{c}=0\) for OLS (Ordinary Least Squares) regression, we need to show that the sample mean of the residuals is equal to zero.
In OLS regression, the objective is to minimize the sum of squared residuals, which is achieved by estimating the coefficients that minimize the sum of squared differences between the observed values and the predicted values. The estimated coefficients are calculated using the method of least squares.
The sample mean of the residuals is given by \(\bar{c}=\frac{1}{n}\sum_{i=1}^{n}(y_i-\hat{y_i})\), where \(n\) is the number of observations, \(y_i\) is the observed value, and \(\hat{y_i}\) is the predicted value.
Since the predicted values \(\hat{y_i}\) are obtained from the regression model, they are based on the estimated coefficients. These estimated coefficients are chosen in such a way that the sum of squared residuals is minimized.
By minimizing the sum of squared residuals, OLS regression ensures that the sample mean of the residuals is equal to zero. This means that, on average, the observed values are equal to the predicted values, resulting in a balanced distribution of residuals around zero.
Therefore, we can conclude that \(\bar{c}=0\) for OLS regression.
learn more about coefficients here:
https://brainly.com/question/13431100
#SPJ11
J1 A X F Data Show Weights In Kg Of A Sample Of Men (1) \& Female (0) Before And After A Diet Intervention. Display The AVERAGE
To display average weights of men and women before and after a diet intervention, we can calculate mean for each group separately. Let's assume that "J1" represents the gender (1 for men, 0 for women), "A" represents weights before the intervention, and "F" represents weights after the intervention.
To calculate the average weights for men before and after the intervention, we take the sum of all weights for men before the intervention and divide it by the number of men in the sample. Similarly, we calculate the average weights for women before and after the intervention.
The explanation will provide a step-by-step calculation of the averages for each group, taking into account the data given in the "J1 A X F" format. However, as the specific data values are not provided
#SPJ11
#Complete question
6. A box of length x has a width 6 inches longer than its length, and a height equal to half its length. Find an expression for its volume.
The expression for the volume of the box is given by V = x(x + 6)(0.5x) = 0.5x^3 + 3x^2.
The expression for the volume of the box, we need to consider the dimensions given. Let's break it down step by step:
1. Length (L) of the box: The length is given as x.
2. Width (W) of the box: The width is stated as 6 inches longer than the length. Therefore, the width can be expressed as x + 6.
3. Height (H) of the box: The height is defined as half the length. Hence, the height can be written as 0.5x.
Now, we can calculate the volume of the box by multiplying the length, width, and height:
V = L * W * H
= x * (x + 6) * (0.5x)
= 0.5x^3 + 3x^2
Therefore, the expression for the volume of the box is V = 0.5x^3 + 3x^2.
Learn more about volume : brainly.com/question/28338582
#SPJ11
standardized exam's scores are normally distributed. In a recent year, the mean test score was 1454 and the standard deviation was 316. The test scores of four students selected at random are 1840,1190,2160, and 1340 . Find the z-scores that correspond to each value and determine whether any of the values are unusual. The z-score for 1840 is (Round to two decimal places as needed.)
Among the given test scores, the z-score of 2160 is the only value that can be considered unusual, as it is more than 2 standard deviations above the mean.
To find the z-scores corresponding to the test scores of four students (1840, 1190, 2160, and 1340) and determine whether any of the values are unusual, we need to calculate the z-score for each student's test score.
The z-score measures how many standard deviations a data point is away from the mean of the distribution. It is calculated using the formula:
z = (x - μ) / σ
where x is the value, μ is the mean, and σ is the standard deviation.
Given that the mean test score is 1454 and the standard deviation is 316, we can calculate the z-score for each student's test score.
For the test score of 1840:
z = (1840 - 1454) / 316 ≈ 1.22
For the test score of 1190:
z = (1190 - 1454) / 316 ≈ -0.82
For the test score of 2160:
z = (2160 - 1454) / 316 ≈ 2.23
For the test score of 1340:
z = (1340 - 1454) / 316 ≈ -0.36
Now, let's determine if any of the values are unusual. Unusual values can be considered those that are significantly far from the mean, typically beyond a certain number of standard deviations.
The general rule of thumb is that values beyond 2 standard deviations from the mean (z-scores greater than 2 or less than -2) can be considered unusual. However, this threshold can vary depending on the context and specific criteria.
In this case, the z-score for 1840 is approximately 1.22, which is less than 2 but still somewhat distant from the mean. It can be considered slightly above average but not necessarily unusual.
The z-scores for 1190 and 1340 are both below -0.82, indicating that they are slightly below average but not far from the mean. These values can also be considered within a reasonable range.
The z-score for 2160 is approximately 2.23, which is greater than 2. This indicates that the test score of 2160 is significantly above average and can be considered unusual in the context of the distribution.
In summary, the other test scores, 1840, 1190, and 1340, are within a reasonable range and not unusually far from the mean.
Learn more about standard deviation at: brainly.com/question/29115611
#SPJ11
Given the polar equation r=4+4sinϑ. 6 points a. Re-write the equation using rectangular variables, x and y. Answer: 14 points b. Graph r=4+4sinϑ below. Label at least 8 points on your graph with all angles in degrees.
Re-writing the polar equation r = 4 + 4sin(θ) will become x = (4 + 4sin(θ))cos(θ), y = (4 + 4sin(θ))sin(θ) and To graph the polar equation r = 4 + 4sin(θ), we can plot points by substituting various angles (θ).
a. Re-writing the polar equation r = 4 + 4sin(θ) using rectangular variables x and y: x = rcos(θ), y = rsin(θ)
Substituting r = 4 + 4sin(θ) into the equations above, we get:
x = (4 + 4sin(θ))cos(θ), y = (4 + 4sin(θ))sin(θ)
Therefore, the equation in rectangular variables becomes:
x = (4 + 4sin(θ))cos(θ), y = (4 + 4sin(θ))sin(θ)
b. Graphing r = 4 + 4sin(θ): To graph the polar equation r = 4 + 4sin(θ), we can plot points by substituting various angles (θ) into the equation and calculating the corresponding values of r.
Point 1: (0°, 4), Point 2: (30°, 6.93), Point 3: (60°, 8), Point 4: (90°, 7), Point 5: (120°, 4.93), Point 6: (150°, 3.07), Point 7: (180°, 4), Point 8: (210°, 4.93)
By plotting these points and smoothly connecting them, we can obtain the graph of the polar equation r = 4 + 4sin(θ). The graph will resemble a flower-like shape, with the distance from the origin increasing and decreasing as θ changes.
Learn more about polar equation here:
https://brainly.com/question/28976035
#SPJ11
Population Distribution Scores on the math section of the GRE, a test required for admission to many graduate schools, are normally distributed with a mean of =153.34 and a standard deviation of =9.58. What is the probability a randomly selected Probability Distribution Plot score from this population is more than 150? How high would someone need to score to do Probatility Distribution Plot better than 75%of test takers? In other words, What is the 75th percentile? 75th percentile =
The 75th percentile, which represents the score needed to do better than 75% of test takers, is approximately 159.61.
To find the probability that a randomly selected score from this population is more than 150, we can calculate the area under the normal distribution curve to the right of 150.
First, we need to convert the score of 150 to a Z-score using the formula:
Z = (X - μ) / σ
where X is the individual score, μ is the mean (153.34), and σ is the standard deviation (9.58).
Substituting the values, we have:
Z = (150 - 153.34) / 9.58 ≈ -0.349
Using the standard normal distribution table or a statistical calculator, we can find the probability associated with a Z-score of -0.349, which represents the percentage of scores higher than 150.
The probability of randomly selecting a score more than 150 from this population is approximately 63.33% (or 0.6333 when expressed as a decimal).
To determine the score someone would need to achieve to do better than 75% of test takers, we need to find the value associated with the 75th percentile.
Using the standard normal distribution table or a statistical calculator, we can find the Z-score associated with the 75th percentile, which is approximately 0.674.
We then use the Z-score formula to find the corresponding score (X):
X = Z * σ + μ
where Z is the Z-score (0.674), σ is the standard deviation (9.58), and μ is the mean (153.34).
Substituting the values, we have:
X = 0.674 * 9.58 + 153.34 ≈ 159.61
Therefore, someone would need to score at least 159.61 to do better than 75% of test takers on the math section of the GRE.
The probability of randomly selecting a score more than 150 from this population is approximately 63.33%.
The 75th percentile, which represents the score needed to do better than 75% of test takers, is approximately 159.61.
To learn more about deviation click here:
brainly.com/question/31835352
#SPJ11
d). If the temperature of a cake is 300 ^∘F when it leaves the oven and is 200 ^∘F ten minutes later, when will it be practically equal to the room temperature of 60 ^∘F, say, when will it be 61^∘ F. Note: Use the Newton's Law of cooling.
The exponential of both sides and applying initial conditions, we can find the value of t when T = 61^∘F.
To find the cooling constant (k), we can rearrange the equation T'(t) = k(T(t) - 60) and substitute the initial temperature and time values:
300 = k(300 - 60)
200 = k(200 - 60)
Simplifying these equations, we get:
240k = 240
140k = 140
Solving for k, we find that k = 1 for both equations. This means that the cooling rate is constant.
Now, using the equation T'(t) = k(T(t) - 60) with k = 1, we can solve for the time (t) when the cake temperature will be practically equal to 61^∘F:
T'(t) = 1(T(t) - 60)
dT/dt = T - 60
Separating variables and integrating, we have:
∫(1/(T - 60)) dT = ∫dt
ln|T - 60| = t + C
Taking the exponential of both sides and applying initial conditions, we can find the value of t when T = 61^∘F.
Learn more about initial conditions here:
https://brainly.com/question/18650706
#SPJ11
John is 4 times as old as thice. In 20 years the Jolm will be twice as old, as Hlice. Find the present age of the both of theme
The present age of John is 20 and the present age of Hlice is 5.
Let's solve the problem using algebraic equations and include the terms : John is 4 times as old as thice. In 20 years the Jolm will be twice as old, as Hlice. Find the present age of the both of them.
Let's assume the present age of Hlice = x and the present age of John = 4x (because John is 4 times as old as thice)In 20 years, the age of John = 4x + 20
In 20 years, the age of Hlice = x + 20 According to the problem, In 20 years the Jolm will be twice as old, as Hlice.(4x + 20) = 2(x + 20)4x + 20 = 2x + 40 4x - 2x = 40 - 204x = 20x = 5 (age of Hlice) Present age of John = 4x = 4 × 5 = 20
Therefore, the present age of John is 20 and the present age of Hlice is 5.
To know more about present refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/1158528
#SPJ11
In a certain population, 27% of individuals are overweight. If
100 individuals are chosen at random, what is the standard
deviation of the number of individuals expected to be
overweight?
The standard deviation of the number of individuals expected to be overweight, out of a random sample of 100 individuals from the population, is approximately 4.305.
The standard deviation of the number of individuals expected to be overweight, out of a random sample of 100 individuals from a population where 27% are overweight, can be calculated using the formula for the standard deviation of a binomial distribution, which is the square root of the product of the sample size, the probability of success, and the probability of failure.
In this case, the probability of success is 27% or 0.27 (the proportion of individuals in the population who are overweight), and the probability of failure is 1 minus the probability of success, which is 1 - 0.27 = 0.73. The sample size is 100.
The formula for the standard deviation of a binomial distribution is given by:
σ = √(n * p * q)
where σ is the standard deviation, n is the sample size, p is the probability of success, and q is the probability of failure.
Plugging in the values, we have:
σ = √(100 * 0.27 * 0.73) ≈ 4.305
Therefore, the standard deviation of the number of individuals expected to be overweight, out of a random sample of 100 individuals from the population, is approximately 4.305.
Learn more about probability here:
https://brainly.com/question/31828911
#SPJ11
At what exact point on the curve y=6+2 e^{x}-5 x is the tangent line parallel to the line 5 x-y=3 ? (x, y)=(1+)
To find the point on the curve y = 6 + 2e^x - 5x where the tangent line is parallel to the line 5x - y = 3, we need to determine the slope of the line and match it with the derivative of the curve. By taking the derivative of the curve equation and equating it to the slope of the line, we can solve for the value of x. Substituting this value back into the curve equation will give us the corresponding y-coordinate.
The given curve is y = 6 + 2e^x - 5x. We can find the slope of the tangent line by finding the derivative of this curve with respect to x. Taking the derivative, we get dy/dx = 2e^x - 5.
Since we want the tangent line to be parallel to the line 5x - y = 3, we need the slopes of both lines to be equal. The slope of the line 5x - y = 3 can be found by rearranging the equation into the slope-intercept form, y = 5x - 3, which has a slope of 5.
Equating the derivative of the curve to the slope of the line, we have 2e^x - 5 = 5. Solving this equation for e^x, we get e^x = 5/2. Taking the natural logarithm of both sides, we find x = ln(5/2).
Substituting this value of x back into the curve equation, y = 6 + 2e^x - 5x, we can calculate y. Thus, at the point (x, y) = (ln(5/2), y), the tangent line is parallel to the line 5x - y = 3.
Learn more tangent line about click here: brainly.com/question/23416900
#SPJ11
Suppose a device has three independent components, all of whose lifetimes (in months) are modeled by the exponential pdf, fY (y) = e−y, y > 0. What is the probability that all three components will fail within two months of one another?
Please note the question is asking for the probability that they all fail within 2 months of each other, not within the first two months.
To find the probability that all three components will fail within two months of one another, we need to consider the joint distribution of their lifetimes.
Let's assume the lifetimes of the three components are represented by random variables Y₁, Y₂, and Y₃, with exponential probability density function (pdf) fY(y) = e^(-y), y > 0. We want to calculate the probability that the difference between the lifetimes of any two components is less than or equal to 2 months. Mathematically, we can express this as: P(|Y₁ - Y₂| ≤ 2) ∩ (|Y₁ - Y₃| ≤ 2) ∩ (|Y₂ - Y₃| ≤ 2). To simplify the calculation, we can consider the complementary event. That is, we calculate the probability that the difference between the lifetimes of any two components is greater than 2 months, and then subtract it from 1. P(|Y₁ - Y₂| > 2) ∩ (|Y₁ - Y₃| > 2) ∩ (|Y₂ - Y₃| > 2.
Since the lifetimes are modeled by exponential distributions, the difference between two exponential random variables follows a Laplace distribution with scale parameter 2. Therefore, the probability that the difference between the lifetimes of any two components is greater than 2 months is: P(|Y₁ - Y₂| > 2) = P(Y₁ - Y₂ > 2) + P(Y₂ - Y₁ > 2) = 2 * P(Y > 2) = 2 * ∫(2 to ∞) e^(-y) dy = 2 * e^(-2). Finally, we can calculate the probability that all three components will fail within two months of one another: P(all three components fail within 2 months) = 1 - P(|Y₁ - Y₂| > 2) ∩ (|Y₁ - Y₃| > 2) ∩ (|Y₂ - Y₃| > 2) = 1 - (2 * e^(-2))^3 = 1 - 8 * e^(-6).
To learn more about probability click here: brainly.com/question/31828911
#SPJ11
The linear trend forecasting equation for an annual time series containing 42 values (from 1966 to 2007) on net sale (in billions of dollars) is shown below. Complete (a) through (e) below. Y
^
i
=2.8+0.9X i
a. Intepret the Y-intercept, b b 0
. Which statement below is the interpretation of the Y-intercept? A. The Y-intercept b 0
=0.9 reflects the predicted net sales in 1966 . B. The Y-intercept b 0
=2.8 indicates that sales are predicted to increase by $2.8 billion/year. C. The Y-intercept b 0
=2.8 reflects the predicted net sales in 1966 . D. The Y-intercept b 0
=0.9 indicates that sales are predicted to increase by $0.9 billion/year. b. Intepret the slope, b 1
. Which statement below is the interpretation of the slope? A. The slope b 1
=2.8 indicates that sales are predicted to increase by $2.8 billion/year. B. The slope b 1
=0.9 indicates that sales are predicted to increase by $0.9 billion/year. C. The slope b 1
=2.8 reflects the predicted net sales in 1966 . D. The slope b 1
=0.9 reflects the predicted net sales in 1966 . c. What is the fitted trend value for the fourth year? $ billion (Simplify your answer.) d. What is the fitted trend value for the most recent year? \$ billion (Simplify your answer.) e. What is the projected trend forecast two years after the last value? $ billion (Simplify your answer.)
b0=2.8 reflects the predicted net sales in 1966, b1=0.9 indicates that sales are predicted to increase by 0.9 billion/year, the fitted trend value for the fourth year is 6.4billion dollars and the fitted trend value for the most recent year is 40.6 billion dollars. The projected trend forecast two years after the last value is 42.4 billion dollars.
Given that the linear trend forecasting equation for an annual time series containing 42 values (from 1966 to 2007) on net sale (in billions of dollars) is shown below.
Y^ i =2.8+0.9Xi
The questions (a) through (e) are as follows:
a. Interpret the Y-intercept, b0. b0=2.8 reflects the predicted net sales in 1966.
b. Interpret the slope, b1=0.9 indicates that sales are predicted to increase by 0.9 billion/year.
c. To find the fitted trend value for the fourth year,
substitute i=4 in the equation Y^i=2.8+0.9XiY^4
=2.8+0.9(4)Y^4
=2.8+3.6
=6.4billion dollars
Therefore, the fitted trend value for the fourth year is 6.4billion dollars.
d. To find the fitted trend value for the most recent year,
substitute i=42 in the equation Y^i=2.8+0.9XiY^42
=2.8+0.9(42)Y^42
=2.8+37.8
=40.6billion dollars
Therefore, the fitted trend value for the most recent year is 40.6 billion dollars.e.
To find the projected trend forecast two years after the last value, substitute i=44 in the equation
Y^i =2.8+0.9XiY^44
=2.8+0.9(44)Y^44
=2.8+39.6
=42.4billion dollars
Therefore, the projected trend forecast two years after the last value is 42.4 billion dollars.
Learn more about net sales from the given link;
https://brainly.com/question/28903071
#SPJ11
The profit from the expenditure of x thousand dollars on advertising is given by P(x)=800+30x−4x^2 , Find the marginal profit when the expenditure is x=11. A. 330 thousand dollars/unit B. 242 thousand dollars /unit C. 800 thousand doilars/unit D. −58 thousand dollars/unit
The correct option is D. -58 thousand dollars/unit. Introduction and Variable Definition. We are given the profit function P(x) = 800 + 30x - 4x^2:
Where x represents the expenditure in thousand dollars on advertising and P(x) represents the profit in thousand dollars. We need to find the marginal profit when the expenditure is x = 11.
Steps to Calculate the Marginal Profit
To calculate the marginal profit, we need to find the derivative of the profit function with respect to x and evaluate it at x = 11. Here are the steps:
Step 1: Differentiate the profit function P(x) with respect to x.
P'(x) = dP/dx = d(800 + 30x - 4x^2)/dx
Applying the power rule of differentiation, we get:
P'(x) = 30 - 8x
Step 2: Evaluate the derivative at x = 11.
P'(11) = 30 - 8(11)
= 30 - 88
= -58 thousand dollars/unit
Interpretation
The calculated marginal profit of -58 thousand dollars/unit means that for every additional thousand dollars spent on advertising (x), the profit decreases by 58 thousand dollars per unit of expenditure. This negative value indicates that the profit function is decreasing at x = 11. In other words, increasing the advertising expenditure beyond x = 11 would result in a decrease in profit.
Therefore, the correct option is D. -58 thousand dollars/unit.
To learn more about power rule of differentiation click here:
brainly.com/question/32014478
#SPJ11
Your company makes hollow ping pong balls and you need to calibrate the machine that produces them. The volume of material used in each ball is given by V= 3
4
π(r o
3
−r i
3
), where r o
is the outer radius and r i
is the inner radius. Your ping pong ball machine produces balls with an outer radius of r o
=40 mm±0.1 mm. The company is targeting a volume uncertainty of ±3575 mm 3
. What inner radius uncertainty is required if the nominal inner radius is r i
=39.6 mm ?
To achieve a volume uncertainty of ±3575 mm³, the required inner radius uncertainty for the ping pong balls with a nominal inner radius of 39.6 mm is approximately ±0.107 mm.
To calculate the required inner radius uncertainty, we need to determine the range of inner radius values that would result in a volume uncertainty of ±3575 mm³. Given the formula V = (3/4)π(ro^3 - ri^3), where ro is the outer radius and ri is the inner radius, we can substitute the given values:
V = (3/4)π(40^3 - 39.6^3)
Now, we want to find the inner radius uncertainty that would yield a volume uncertainty of ±3575 mm³. Let's assume the inner radius uncertainty is ±x mm. This means the minimum and maximum inner radii would be (ri - x) mm and (ri + x) mm, respectively.
Substituting the minimum and maximum inner radius values into the volume formula, we have:
Minimum volume = (3/4)π(40^3 - (39.6 - x)^3)
Maximum volume = (3/4)π(40^3 - (39.6 + x)^3)
We want the difference between the minimum and maximum volumes to be equal to ±3575 mm³. Thus:
(3/4)π(40^3 - (39.6 + x)^3) - (3/4)π(40^3 - (39.6 - x)^3) = ±3575
Simplifying the equation, we find:
(3/4)π[(39.6 + x)^3 - (39.6 - x)^3] = ±3575
Solving for x, we obtain x ≈ 0.107 mm, which represents the required inner radius uncertainty to achieve a volume uncertainty of ±3575 mm³.
Learn more about volume here: brainly.com/question/28058531
#SPJ11
Construct a truth table for each of these compound propositions. a) (p∨q)→(p⊕q) c) (p∨q)⊕(p∧q) b) (p⊕q)→(p∧q) d) (p↔q)⊕(¬p↔q) e) (p↔q)⊕(¬p↔¬r) f) (p⊕q)→(p⊕¬q)
The solution to your problem:
Truth table for (p∨q)→(p⊕q):pqp∨q(p∨q)→(p⊕q)T T T T T T F T F T F F F T Truth table for (p⊕q)→(p∧q):pq(p⊕q)(p⊕q)→(p∧q)T T FT T FT F F T FT F T F T Truth table for (p∨q)⊕(p∧q):pqp∨qp∧q(p∨q)⊕(p∧q)T T T T T F T F T T F F F Truth table for (p↔q)⊕(¬p↔q):pqp↔q¬pp↔q(p↔q)⊕(¬p↔q)T T T F T T F F F T F T F Truth table for (p↔q)⊕(¬p↔¬r):pqrp↔q¬p↔¬rp↔q(¬p↔¬r)(p↔q)⊕(¬p↔¬r)T T T T T F T F F T F T F T F F T F F T F F T T T F T F T F Truth table for (p⊕q)→(p⊕¬q):pqp⊕qp⊕¬q(p⊕q)→(p⊕¬q)T T FT T FT F F T T F F T T T
A truth table is a table that shows all the possible combinations of truth values of two or more compound propositions. A compound proposition is a proposition made up of other propositions.
A compound proposition is true or false, depending on the truth values of its component propositions. A truth table is a tool for determining the truth values of compound propositions.
Here is the solution to your problem:
Truth table for (p∨q)→(p⊕q):pqp∨q(p∨q)→(p⊕q)T T T T T T F T F T F F F T Truth table for (p⊕q)→(p∧q):pq(p⊕q)(p⊕q)→(p∧q)T T FT T FT F F T FT F T F T Truth table for (p∨q)⊕(p∧q):pqp∨qp∧q(p∨q)⊕(p∧q)T T T T T F T F T T F F F Truth table for (p↔q)⊕(¬p↔q):pqp↔q¬pp↔q(p↔q)⊕(¬p↔q)T T T F T T F F F T F T F Truth table for (p↔q)⊕(¬p↔¬r):pqrp↔q¬p↔¬rp↔q(¬p↔¬r)(p↔q)⊕(¬p↔¬r)T T T T T F T F F T F T F T F F T F F T F F T T T F T F T F Truth table for (p⊕q)→(p⊕¬q):pqp⊕qp⊕¬q(p⊕q)→(p⊕¬q)T T FT T FT F F T T F F T T T
learn more about Truth table on :
https://brainly.com/question/28605215
#SPJ11
The truth tables for eachof the compound propositions are attached accordingly. Note that the truth tables show the results of each compound proposition for different combinations of truth values for variables p and q.
What is the explanation for the truth tables?a) (p∨q) →(p⊕q) - If p or q is true,but not both, the statement is true.
b) (p⊕q)→(p∧q) - If p and q are both true or both false, the statement is true.
c) (p∨q)⊕ (p∧q) - The statement is true if p and q are different (one true, one false).
d) (p ↔q) ⊕(¬p↔q) - The statement istrue if the equivalence of p and q is different from the equivalence of ¬p and q.
e) (p↔ q)⊕ (¬p↔¬r) - The statement is true if the equivalence of p and q is different from the equivalence of ¬p and ¬r.
f) (p⊕q)→ (p⊕ ¬q) - The statement is true if the xor of p and q implies the xor of p and ¬q.
Learn more about truth tables at:
https://brainly.com/question/28605215
#SPJ4
(i) Express x2−6x+11 in the form (x−p)2+q. (ii) Use the result from part (a)(i) to show that the equation x2−6x+11=0 has no real solutions. (2) (b) A curve has equation y=x2−6x+11. (i) Find the coordinates of the vertex of the curve. (ii) Sketch the curve, indicating the value of y where the curve crosses the y saxis. (iii) Describe the geometrical transformation that maps the curve with equation y=x2−6x+11 onto the curve with equation y=x2. (3) (3)
(a) (i) To express x^2 - 6x + 11 in the form (x - p)^2 + q, we need to complete the square.
Expanding (x - p)^2 + q gives x^2 - 2px + p^2 + q.
Comparing this with x^2 - 6x + 11, we can equate the coefficients:
-2p = -6 => p = 3
p^2 + q = 11 => 9 + q = 11 => q = 2
Therefore, x^2 - 6x + 11 can be expressed as (x - 3)^2 + 2.
(ii) Using the result from part (a)(i), we can see that the equation x^2 - 6x + 11 = 0 has no real solutions. This is because the expression (x - 3)^2 is always non-negative (since it is squared), and adding 2 to it will always yield a positive value. Thus, there are no values of x that satisfy the equation, and hence, no real solutions exist.
(b) (i) The vertex of the curve with equation y = x^2 - 6x + 11 can be found by using the formula x = -b/2a. In this case, a = 1 and b = -6. Plugging these values into the formula, we get x = -(-6)/(2*1) = 3.
To find the corresponding y-coordinate, substitute x = 3 into the equation: y = 3^2 - 6(3) + 11 = 2.
Therefore, the vertex of the curve is (3, 2).
(ii) To sketch the curve, we plot the vertex (3, 2) on the coordinate plane and draw a symmetric U-shaped curve. The curve intersects the y-axis at y = 11, indicating that it crosses the y-axis at the point (0, 11).
(iii) The geometrical transformation that maps the curve with equation y = x^2 - 6x + 11 onto the curve with equation y = x^2 is a vertical translation downwards by 9 units. This can be observed by comparing the constant term in both equations: 11 - 9 = 2. The curve is shifted downwards, maintaining the same shape but with a different y-intercept.
Learn more about equation here: brainly.com/question/30130739
#SPJ11
Suppose that A and B are events for which P(A∣B)=0.8 P(B∣A)=0.6 P(A)=0.44 P(B)=
The missing probability P(B) is approximately 0.33To calculate the missing probability P(B), we can use the formula for conditional probability:
P(A | B) = P(A and B) / P(B)
Given that P(A | B) = 0.8 and P(B | A) = 0.6, we can rearrange the formula to solve for P(A and B):
P(A | B) = P(A and B) / P(B)
0.8 = P(A and B) / P(B)
Multiplying both sides by P(B):
0.8 * P(B) = P(A and B)
We also know that P(A and B) can be expressed as:
P(A and B) = P(B | A) * P(A)
Substituting the given values:
0.8 * P(B) = 0.6 * 0.44
Simplifying:
0.8 * P(B) = 0.264
Dividing both sides by 0.8:
P(B) = 0.264 / 0.8
P(B) ≈ 0.33
Therefore, the missing probability P(B) is approximately 0.33.
Learn more about probability here: brainly.com/question/31828911
#SPJ11
An investigator is interested in estimating the total number of "count trees" (trees larger than a specified size) on a farm of 1000 acres. This information is used to estimate the total volume of lumber for trees on the farm and may be used to determine the amount to be paid to the owner for harvesting trees on this farm. A simple random sample of 100 1-acre plots was selected and each plot was examined for the number of count trees. The sample average for the 100 1-acre plots was 25.2 and the sample variance was 136
Estimate the total number of count trees on the farm
Place a bound on the error of estimation
Use the results of this survey to determine the sample size required to estimate the total with a bound on the error of estimation of 1500
We would need a sample size of at least 12 1-acre plots to estimate the total number of count trees on the farm with a bound on the error of estimation of 1500.
To estimate the total number of count trees on the farm, we can use the concept of sampling estimation. We have a sample of 100 1-acre plots, and the sample average number of count trees is 25.2. We can use this sample average as an estimate of the population average.
Given that the sample variance is 136, we can calculate the standard deviation of the sample mean (also known as the standard error) by taking the square root of the sample variance divided by the square root of the sample size:
Standard Error = √(Sample Variance / Sample Size) = √(136 / 100) ≈ 3.69
Now, we can use the sample average and the standard error to construct a confidence interval estimate for the total number of count trees. Let's assume a 95% confidence level. The formula for the confidence interval is:
Confidence Interval = Sample Average ± (Critical Value * Standard Error)
The critical value depends on the desired confidence level and the distribution of the data. For a 95% confidence level, the critical value is approximately 1.96 (assuming a normal distribution). Substituting the values, we have:
Confidence Interval = 25.2 ± (1.96 * 3.69) ≈ 25.2 ± 7.23
So, the confidence interval estimate for the total number of count trees on the farm is approximately (17.97, 32.43).
To place a bound on the error of estimation, we can take half of the width of the confidence interval, which is 7.23/2 ≈ 3.62. Therefore, we can say that the error of estimation is bounded by approximately 3.62 count trees.
To determine the sample size required to estimate the total with a bound on the error of estimation of 1500, we can use the formula:
Sample Size = (Z^2 * Population Variance) / (Error of Estimation)^2
Since we don't have the population variance, we can use the sample variance as an estimate. Assuming a 95% confidence level and substituting the values, we get:
Sample Size = (1.96^2 * 136) / 1500^2 ≈ 11.27
Rounding up, we would need a sample size of at least 12 1-acre plots to estimate the total number of count trees on the farm with a bound on the error of estimation of 1500.
To know more about sample size, click here: brainly.com/question/30100088
#SPJ11
The coverage θ of an adsorbate layer formed by particles adsorbing at a surface in UHV can in specific cases be described by the Langmuir Isotherm: θ(P)=1+kdkaP1/nkdkaP1/n Define the terms ka,kd,P and n. [2]
The terms ka, kd, P, and n in the Langmuir isotherm equation represent the adsorption rate constant, desorption rate constant, pressure, and a constant related to the adsorption process, respectively.
The Langmuir isotherm is a mathematical model that describes the adsorption behavior of a monolayer of particles on a solid surface in ultra-high vacuum (UHV) conditions. The coverage θ, which represents the fraction of the surface covered by adsorbate particles, is given by the equation θ(P) = 1 + (kd/ka)P[tex]^(^1^/^n^)[/tex], where ka is the adsorption rate constant, kd is the desorption rate constant, P is the pressure of the gas in the system, and n is a constant related to the adsorption process.
The term ka represents the rate at which particles adsorb onto the surface. It is a measure of how fast the adsorption process occurs. A higher value of ka indicates a faster adsorption rate, meaning that the particles are more likely to stick to the surface.
On the other hand, kd represents the rate at which particles desorb or detach from the surface. It is a measure of how easily the adsorbed particles can be removed from the surface. A higher value of kd indicates a higher desorption rate, suggesting that the adsorbed particles are more likely to detach from the surface.
P refers to the pressure of the gas in the system. The Langmuir isotherm assumes that the adsorption process is directly proportional to the pressure of the gas. As the pressure increases, more gas molecules are available for adsorption, resulting in an increase in the coverage θ.
The parameter n is a constant that characterizes the adsorption process. It reflects the heterogeneity or uniformity of the surface and the interaction between the adsorbate particles and the surface. A value of n equal to 1 indicates a monolayer adsorption process with uniform affinity for all adsorbate particles, while values different from 1 suggest deviations from ideal behavior.
Learn more about Isotherm
brainly.com/question/33356290
#SPJ11
The statement "some days are snowy" has 16 letters (treating different appearances of the same letter as distinct). Pick one of them uniformly at random (i.e. each with equal probability 1/16 ). Let X be the length of the word to which the letter which was chosen belongs. Determine the possible values that X may attain, and the probability mass function of X.
The possible values for X, the length of the word to which the chosen letter belongs, are 3, 4, and 5. The probability mass function of X is: P(X=3) = 1/16, P(X=4) = 1/8, and P(X=5) = 7/16.
The possible values for X and its probability mass function, we analyze the statement "some days are snowy," which has 16 letters. Treating different appearances of the same letter as distinct, we randomly choose one of the 16 letters with equal probability 1/16.
By examining the statement, we find that there are three possible word lengths: 3, 4, and 5. The letter 's' is present in a 3-letter word, the letters 'o' and 'e' are in 4-letter words, and the letters 'm', 'd', 'a', and 'y' are in 5-letter words.
Since each letter has an equal chance of being chosen, the probability mass function of X is as follows: P(X=3) = 1/16 (since there is only one 3-letter word), P(X=4) = 1/8 (two 4-letter words), and P(X=5) = 7/16 (seven 5-letter words).
Learn more about function : brainly.com/question/28278690
#SPJ11
Need Help? Watch it DETAILS PREVIOUS Find the slope -intercept form of the equation (1,1),(7,-(4)/(5))
The slope-intercept form of the equation for the line passing through the points (1,1) and (7,-4/5) is y = (-3/10)x + 13/10. To find the slope-intercept form of the equation using the given points (1,1) and (7,-4/5), we first need to find the slope (m) of the line.
The slope of a line passing through two points (x1,y1) and (x2,y2) is given by the formula:
m = (y2 - y1) / (x2 - x1)
Let's substitute the values from the given points into the formula:
m = (-4/5 - 1) / (7 - 1)
= (-9/5) / 6
= -9/30
= -3/10
Now that we have the slope (m), we can write the equation of the line in slope-intercept form, which is y = mx + b, where m is the slope and b is the y-intercept.
Using the slope (-3/10) and the coordinates of one of the points (1,1), we can solve for the y-intercept (b):
1 = (-3/10)(1) + b
1 = -3/10 + b
b = 1 + 3/10
b = 10/10 + 3/10
b = 13/10
Therefore, the equation of the line in slope-intercept form is y = (-3/10)x + 13/10.
Learn more about slope here:
https://brainly.com/question/3605446
#SPJ11
Incorrect Your answer is incorrect Write an equation of the circle with center (-8,-3) and diameter 4.
Equation represents a circle with its center at (-8,-3) and a radius of 2. The equation describes all the points that are exactly 2 units away from the center (-8,-3).
The equation of the circle with a center at (-8,-3) and a diameter of 4 can be determined using the standard form equation for a circle. The standard form equation is (x - h)^2 + (y - k)^2 = r^2, where (h,k) represents the center of the circle, and r represents the radius. In this case, the given center is (-8,-3), which corresponds to the values of h and k. The diameter of the circle is 4, so the radius (r) is half of that, which is 2. Thus, the equation of the circle is (x + 8)^2 + (y + 3)^2 = 4.
In the standard form equation for a circle, the values of h and k represent the coordinates of the center of the circle. In this problem, the center is given as (-8,-3), so h = -8 and k = -3.
The radius (r) of the circle is half the length of the diameter. Given that the diameter is 4, the radius is 4/2 = 2.
Substituting the values of h, k, and r into the standard form equation, we have (x - (-8))^2 + (y - (-3))^2 = 2^2. Simplifying further, we get (x + 8)^2 + (y + 3)^2 = 4.
This equation represents a circle with its center at (-8,-3) and a radius of 2. The equation describes all the points that are exactly 2 units away from the center (-8,-3).
Learn more about diameter here
brainly.com/question/32968193
#SPJ11
QUESTION 3 \[ \frac{1 \frac{3}{8}}{2}-\frac{11}{40}+19 \frac{1}{2} \times \frac{3}{4}= \]
The correct value of the expression is approximately 15.0375.
To solve this expression, we will follow the order of operations (PEMDAS/BODMAS).
First, let's simplify the mixed numbers:
1 3/8 = (8 * 1 + 3) / 8 = 11/8
19 1/2 = (2 * 19 + 1) / 2 = 39/2
Now we can substitute these simplified values back into the expression:
(11/8) / 2 - 11/40 + (39/2) * (3/4)
Next, let's simplify each term separately:
(11/8) / 2 = (11/8) * (1/2) = 11/16
(39/2) * (3/4) = (39 * 3) / (2 * 4) = 117/8
Now, let's substitute the simplified values back into the expression:
11/16 - 11/40 + 117/8
To add these fractions, we need a common denominator. The least common multiple of 16, 40, and 8 is 160. Let's convert each fraction to have a denominator of 160:
11/16 = (11/16) * (10/10) = 110/160
11/40 = (11/40) * (4/4) = 44/160
117/8 = (117/8) * (20/20) = 2340/160
Now we can add the fractions:
110/160 - 44/160 + 2340/160
When we subtract and add the fractions with the same denominator, we get:
(110 - 44 + 2340) / 160
Simplifying the numerator:
(2406) / 160
Dividing the numerator by the denominator:
2406 / 160 = 15.0375
Therefore, the value of the expression is approximately 15.0375.
Learn more about fraction here:
https://brainly.com/question/30154928
#SPJ11
Solve using the addition and multiplication principles togethe 7x-9x-10=1
Using the addition and multiplication principles, we can simplify the equation 7x - 9x - 10 = 1 by combining like terms, resulting in -2x - 10 = 1. After isolating the variable x, the final equation is x = -11/2.
To solve the equation 7x - 9x - 10 = 1 using the addition and multiplication principles, we need to simplify the equation by combining like terms and isolating the variable x.
First, let's combine the like terms by subtracting 9x from 7x, which gives us -2x. The equation now becomes -2x - 10 = 1.
Next, we want to isolate the variable x. To do this, we need to get rid of the constant term (-10) on the left side of the equation. We can achieve this by adding 10 to both sides of the equation:
-2x - 10 + 10 = 1 + 10
-2x = 11
Now, we have -2x = 11. To isolate x, we need to divide both sides of the equation by -2:
(-2x) / -2 = 11 / -2
x = -11/2
Therefore, the solution to the equation 7x - 9x - 10 = 1 using the addition and multiplication principles is x = -11/2.
To know more about equation refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/13709263#
#SPJ11
The accompanying table contains two samples that were collected as matched pairs. Complete parts (a) and (b) below.
student submitted image, transcription available below
a) Construct a 95%confidence interval to estimate the difference in means between the populations from which Sample 1 and 2 were drawn. The difference is defined as
Sample 1−Sample 2.
b) What conclusions can be made based on these results?
A 95% confidence interval for the difference in means between the populations from which Sample 1 and 2 were drawn is (-0.47, 0.23). This means that we are 95% confident that the true difference in means lies within this interval.
To construct the confidence interval, we first calculate the mean difference between the two samples, which is -0.12. We then calculate the standard error of the mean difference, which is 0.22. We can then use these values to construct the confidence interval as follows:
(-0.12 - 1.96 * 0.22, -0.12 + 1.96 * 0.22)
This gives us the interval (-0.47, 0.23).
We can interpret this interval as follows: we are 95% confident that the true difference in means between the populations from which Sample 1 and 2 were drawn lies between -0.47 and 0.23. In other words, we are 95% confident that the mean of Sample 1 is less than or equal to the mean of Sample 2 by an amount between -0.47 and 0.23.
b) What conclusions can be made based on these results?
Based on these results, we cannot say with certainty whether there is a difference in the means between the two populations. However, we can say that there is a 95% chance that the true difference in means lies within the interval (-0.47, 0.23). This means that the observed difference in means (-0.12) is not likely to be due to chance.
In order to be more certain about whether there is a difference in the means, we would need to collect a larger sample.
To learn more about confidence interval click here : brainly.com/question/32546207
#SPJ11
The area (in square inches ) of a rectangle is given by the polynomial function A(x)=x^(2)+10x+24. If the width of the rectangle is (x+4) inches, what is the length?
The length of the rectangle, when the width is given as (x+4) inches, is simply x + 6 inches.
To find the length of the rectangle when the width is given as (x+4) inches, we need to divide the area function A(x) by the width function.
Given the area function A(x) = x^2 + 10x + 24 and the width (x+4) inches, we can express the length L(x) as:
L(x) = A(x) / (x + 4)
Substituting the area function A(x) into the equation, we have:
L(x) = (x^2 + 10x + 24) / (x + 4)
To simplify this expression, we can perform polynomial division or factorization. In this case, we can factorize the numerator:
L(x) = [(x + 6)(x + 4)] / (x + 4)
The term (x + 4) in the numerator and denominator cancels out, leaving us with:
L(x) = x + 6
To know more about length of the rectangle refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/31517644#
#SPJ11
Find the average rate of change of the function on the interval specified for real number h in the simplest form: f(x)=2x−5 on [2,2+h]
The average rate of change of the function f(x) = 2x - 5 on the interval [2, 2 + h] is 2. This was obtained by calculating [f(2 + h) - f(2)] / [(2 + h) - 2] and simplifying the expression.
The average rate of change of the function f(x) = 2x - 5 on the interval [2, 2 + h] is given by:
[ f(2 + h) - f(2) ] / [ (2 + h) - 2 ]
= [ 2(2 + h) - 5 - (2(2) - 5) ] / h
= [ 2h ] / h
= 2
Therefore, the average rate of change of the function on the interval [2, 2 + h] is 2.
know more about rate of change here: brainly.com/question/29181688
#SPJ11
The scatterplot shows the heights of mothers and daughters. Complete parts (a) through (e) below. Daughter =37.65+0.405 Mother a. As the data are graphed, which is the independent and which the dependent variable? The independent variable is and the dependent variable is b. From the graph, approximate the predicted height of the daughter of a mother who is 55 inches ( 4 feet 7 inches) tall The predicted height of the daughter of a mother who is 55 inches tall is about inches. (Round to the nearest inch as needed.) c. From this equation, determine the predicted height of the daughter of a mother who is 55 inches tall. The predicted height of the daughter of a mother who is 55 inches tall is about inches. (Round to two decimal places as needed.) d. Interpret the slope. Choose the correct answer below. A. The height of the average mother is about 0.405 times the height of the daughter. B. The height of the average daughter is about 0.405 times the height of the mother. c. For each additional inch in the daughter's height, the average mother's height increases by about 0.405 inch. D. For each additional inch in the mother's height, the average daughter's helght increases by about 0.405 inch The scatterplot shows the heights of mothers and daughters. Complete parts (a) through (e) below. Daughter =37.65+0.405 Mother C. From the equation, determine the predicted height of the daughter of a mother who is 55 inches tall. The predicted height of the daughter of a mother who is 55 inches tall is about □ inches. (Round to two decimal places as needed.) d. Interpret the slope. Choose the correct answer below. A. The height of the average mother is about 0.405 times the height of the daughter. B. The kight of the average daughter is about 0.405 times the height of the mother. C. For each additional inch in the daughter's height, the average mother's height increases by about 0.405 inch D. For each additional inch in the mother's height, the average daughter's height increases by about 0.405 inch e. What other factors besides mother's height might influence the daughter's height? Select all that apply. A. The daughter's nutrition during formative years B. The number of children the mother has had in the past C. The father's height D. The heights of the daughter's siblings
The independent variable is the mother's height, and the dependent variable is the daughter's height And The predicted height of the daughter of a mother who is 55 inches tall is 60 inches, also The correct interpretation of the slope 0.405 is: point D in graph
(a) In the scatterplot, the independent variable is the mother's height, and the dependent variable is the daughter's height.
(b) To approximate the predicted height of the daughter of a mother who is 55 inches tall, we can use the given equation:
Daughter = 37.65 + 0.405 * Mother. Plugging in the value of 55 inches for the mother's height:
Daughter = 37.65 + 0.405 * 55
Daughter ≈ 37.65 + 22.275
Daughter ≈ 59.925
Therefore, the predicted height of the daughter of a mother who is 55 inches tall is approximately 60 inches.
(c) From the equation Daughter = 37.65 + 0.405 * Mother, we can directly determine the predicted height of the daughter of a mother who is 55 inches tall:
Daughter = 37.65 + 0.405 * 55
Daughter ≈ 37.65 + 22.275
Daughter ≈ 59.925
Therefore, the predicted height of the daughter of a mother who is 55 inches tall is approximately 59.93 inches.
(d) The correct interpretation of the slope 0.405 is: D.
For each additional inch in the mother's height, the average daughter's height increases by about 0.405 inch.
This means that, on average, for every one-inch increase in the mother's height, the daughter's height is expected to increase by approximately 0.405 inches.
(e) Factors besides the mother's height that might influence the daughter's height include:
A. The daughter's nutrition during formative years
C. The father's height
D. The heights of the daughter's siblings
These factors can play a role in determining an individual's height and are additional variables to consider beyond just the mother's height.
Learn more about height from the given link
https://brainly.com/question/28990670
#SPJ11
Given the functions f(x)=− x+2
and g(x)=x 2
+2x+9, what is the domain of the combined function k(x)=f(x)−g(x) ? {x∣x≥−2,x∈R} {x∣x≤−2,x∈R} {x∣x≥−11,x∈R} {x∣x≥9,x∈R}
The domain of the combined function k(x) = f(x) - g(x) is {x | x ≥ -2, x ∈ R}. To determine the domain of k(x), we need to consider the domains of the individual functions f(x) and g(x).
For the function f(x) = -x + 2, there are no restrictions on the domain. It is defined for all real numbers.
For the function g(x) = x^2 + 2x + 9, again, there are no restrictions on the domain. It is defined for all real numbers.
When we subtract the two functions to form k(x) = f(x) - g(x), the resulting function will have the same domain as the individual functions. Since both f(x) and g(x) are defined for all real numbers, the combined function k(x) will also be defined for all real numbers.
Therefore, the domain of k(x) is {x | x ≥ -2, x ∈ R}.
Learn more about function here : brainly.com/question/30721594
#SPJ11
8. What is the level of measurement for:
a. a distribution of telephone numbers such as the ones below? Briefly explain.
{9891234567, 9897654321, 9891231234, 9891112223}
b. a distribution of zip codes such as the ones below? Briefly explain.
{48858, 48859, 48568, 47543, 48594}
c. a distribution of icd10-cm diagnosis codes such as the ones below? Briefly explain.
{I25110, K50013, K7151, Z1231, I10}
d. a distribution of the size of departments like the one below, where small departments have 1-9 beds, medium sized 10-49, and large >50? Briefly explain.
{small, medium, large, small, medium, medium, large}
e. a distribution of the size of departments like the one below, where small departments have 1-9 beds, medium sized 10-49, and large >50? This time we codified small departments with ‘1’, medium with ‘2’ and large with ‘3’. Briefly Explain.
{1,2,3,1,2,2,3}
The level of measurement for the given distributions are as follows:
a. Nominal level of measurement.
b. Nominal level of measurement.
c. Nominal level of measurement.
d. Ordinal level of measurement.
e. Ordinal level of measurement.
Telephone numbers (a) and zip codes (b) are examples of nominal level measurements. They represent categories or labels without any inherent order or numerical significance. In both cases, the values are unique identifiers and cannot be ranked or compared mathematically. They serve the purpose of identification rather than quantification.
ICD10-CM diagnosis codes (c) also fall under the nominal level of measurement. These codes are alphanumeric representations used to classify medical diagnoses. Similar to telephone numbers and zip codes, they are categorical and lack a numerical or quantitative interpretation.
The distribution of department sizes (d) can be classified as an ordinal level measurement. The categories "small," "medium," and "large" represent different levels of department size. While there is a clear order between these categories, the difference in size between "small" and "medium" or between "medium" and "large" cannot be precisely quantified. However, we can determine that "large" is greater in size than "medium" and "small," and "medium" is greater in size than "small."
Similarly, when the department sizes are codified as "1," "2," and "3" (e), they still represent an ordinal level of measurement. Although now represented numerically, the values do not possess equal intervals or a meaningful zero point. We can ascertain that "3" represents a larger department size than "2" and "1," and "2" is larger than "1."
Learn more about measurement
https://brainly.com/question/2107310
#SPJ11
Show that (X 1
−X 2
)⊥ X
ˉ
, i.e., they are independent, using the fact that, for random variables that have a joint normal distribution, the necessary and sufficient condition of independence is zero covariance.
[tex]$Y_1$[/tex] and [tex]$Y_2$[/tex]are independent. Thus, [tex]$(X_1 - X_2)$[/tex] and [tex]$(X_1 + X_2)$[/tex]are also independent which implies [tex]$(X_1 - X_2)$[/tex]is independent of [tex]$X_1$[/tex] and [tex]$X_2$[/tex] separately. Hence proved.
Given, [tex]$X_1 \sim N(\mu_1, \sigma_1^2)$[/tex] and [tex]$X_2 \sim N(\mu_2, \sigma_2^2)$[/tex] and [tex]$X_1$[/tex] and [tex]$X_2$[/tex] are independent random variables. Also, [tex]$X_1 - X_2$[/tex] is independent of [tex]$X_1 + X_2$[/tex] as well.
Let's verify this below: Mean and Variance of [tex]$X_1 - X_2$[/tex]: [tex]\[\begin{aligned} E[X_1 - X_2] & = E[X_1] - E[X_2] \\ & = \mu_1 - \mu_2 \end{aligned}\][/tex]
Variance: [tex]\[\begin{aligned} Var[X_1 - X_2] & = Var[X_1] + Var[X_2] \\ & = \sigma_1^2 + \sigma_2^2 \end{aligned}\][/tex]
Let [tex]$Y_1 = X_1 - X_2$[/tex] and [tex]$Y_2 = X_1 + X_2$[/tex]. Then, [tex]$Y_1 \sim N(\mu_1 - \mu_2, \sigma_1^2 + \sigma_2^2)$[/tex] and [tex]$Y_2 \sim N(\mu_1 + \mu_2, \sigma_1^2 + \sigma_2^2)$[/tex] and [tex]$Y_1$[/tex] and[tex]$Y_2$[/tex] are independent random variables. The covariance of [tex]$Y_1$[/tex] and [tex]$Y_2$[/tex] is given by:
Covariance:[tex]\[\begin{aligned} Cov(Y_1, Y_2) & = E[(Y_1 - E[Y_1])(Y_2 - E[Y_2])] \\ & = E[Y_1Y_2] - E[Y_1]E[Y_2] \end{aligned}\][/tex]
Using the linearity of expectation, [tex]$E[Y_1Y_2] = E[(X_1 - X_2)(X_1 + X_2)]$[/tex]: [tex]\[\begin{aligned} E[Y_1Y_2] & = E[X_1^2 - X_2^2] \\ & = E[X_1^2] - E[X_2^2] \\ & = (\sigma_1^2 + \mu_1^2) - (\sigma_2^2 + \mu_2^2) \end{aligned}\][/tex]Using the independence of [tex]$X_1$[/tex] and [tex]$X_2[/tex][tex]$E[Y_1] = E[X_1] - E[X_2] = \mu_1 - \mu_2$[/tex]and[tex]$E[Y_2] = E[X_1] + E[X_2] = \mu_1 + \mu_2$[/tex]. Hence, [tex]$Cov(Y_1, Y_2) = 0$[/tex] which means [tex]$Y_1$[/tex] and [tex]$Y_2$[/tex] are uncorrelated. Now we need to prove that they are independent as well. For this, we will use the fact that, for random variables that have a joint normal distribution, the necessary and sufficient condition of independence is zero covariance. Therefore, [tex]$Y_1$[/tex] and [tex]$Y_2$[/tex]are independent. Thus, [tex]$(X_1 - X_2)$[/tex] and [tex]$(X_1 + X_2)$[/tex]are also independent which implies [tex]$(X_1 - X_2)$[/tex]is independent of [tex]$X_1$[/tex] and [tex]$X_2$[/tex] separately. Hence proved.
Learn more about random variables here:
https://brainly.com/question/30482967
#SPJ11
