Say whether or not the following pairs of expressions are unifiable, and show the most general unifier for each unifiable pair:1.1.P(x, B, B) and P(A, y, z)2.P(g(f (v)), g(u)) and P(x, x)3.P(x, f (x)) and P(y, y)4.P(y, y, B) and P(z, x, z)5.2 + 3 = x and x = 3 + 3

Wallis's formulas are a set of mathematical formulas that can be used to evaluate certain types of integrals, including the one you have presented. Specifically, we can use the formula:
∫ cos^n(x) dx = (1/n) * cos^(n-1)(x) * sin(x) + ((n-1)/n) * ∫ cos^(n-2)(x) dx
Using this formula with n = 3, we get:
∫ cos^3(x) dx = (1/3) * cos^2(x) * sin(x) + (2/3) * ∫ cos(x) dx
We can further simplify this by using the identity cos^2(x) = 1 - sin^2(x), which gives us:
∫ cos^3(x) dx = (1/3) * (1 - sin^2(x)) * sin(x) + (2/3) * sin(x) + C

Where C is the constant of integration. To evaluate this integral from 0 to 2, we simply need to substitute the limits of integration into our equation and subtract the result at x = 0 from the result at x = 2:
∫/2 0 cos^3(x) dx = [(1/3) * (1 - sin^2(2)) * sin(2) + (2/3) * sin(2)] - [(1/3) * (1 - sin^2(0)) * sin(0) + (2/3) * sin(0)]
After simplifying and evaluating, we get:
∫/2 0 cos^3(x) dx = 0.4659 (to four decimal places)

To learn more about Wallis's formulas : https://brainly.com/question/1216161

#SPJ11

To evaluate these integrals in terms of areas, we can think of the integral of a function f(x) as the area under the curve of f(x) between the limits of integration.

So for the first integral, integral from 0 to 2 of f(x) dx, we would find the area under the curve of f(x) between x=0 and x=2.
Similarly, for the second integral, integral from 0 to 5 of f(x) dx, we would find the area under the curve of f(x) between x=0 and x=5.
And for the third integral, integral from 5 to 7 of f(x) dx, we would find the area under the curve of f(x) between x=5 and x=7.
Finally, for the fourth integral, integral from 0 to 9 of f(x) dx, we would find the total area under the curve of f(x) between x=0 and x=9.

The following integrals by interpreting them in terms of areas, we'll consider each integral separately:
1. integral_0^2 f(x) dx: This integral represents the area under the curve f(x) between the limits x = 0 and x = 2. To evaluate this integral, you need to find the antiderivative of f(x), plug in the limits, and subtract the lower limit's value from the upper limit's value.
2. integral_0^5 f(x) dx: This integral represents the area under the curve f(x) between the limits x = 0 and x = 5. Follow the same procedure as in the first integral, plugging in the new limits.
3. integral_5^7 f(x) dx: This integral represents the area under the curve f(x) between the limits x = 5 and x = 7. Again, find the antiderivative of f(x), plug in the limits, and subtract the lower limit's value from the upper limit's value.
4. integral_0^9 f(x) dx: This integral represents the area under the curve f(x) between the limits x = 0 and x = 9. Follow the same procedure as in the previous integrals, plugging in the new limits.
Remember that to find the exact values for these integrals, you need to know the function f(x). Once you have the function, you can follow the steps provided for each integral to determine their values.

Visit here to learn more about limits:

brainly.com/question/8533149

#SPJ11

Answer:

8

Step-by-step explanation:

8*0

To maximize the enclosed area of the ostrich pens, the farmer should build rectangular pens. 35. The rectangular ostrich pen with 350 feet of fencing material should be built as a square, with each side measuring 87.5 feet. The maximum enclosed area would be 7,656.25 square feet. 36. The rectangular ostrich pen built along the side of a river with 540 feet of fencing material should have two equal sides measuring 135 feet, and one side along the river. The maximum enclosed area would be 18,225 square feet. 37. The rectangular ostrich pen with 1000 feet of fencing material should be divided into three equal sections with two interior fences. Each section should measure 166.67 feet by 333.33 feet. The maximum enclosed area would be 55,555.56 square feet.

35. For a rectangular ostrich pen with 350 feet of fencing material, let the width be x and the length be y. The perimeter equation will be 2x + 2y = 350, which simplifies to x + y = 175. To maximize the area (A), we have A = xy, so we need to find the optimal dimensions. When x = y (i.e., a square), the maximum area is enclosed. In this case, x = y = 87.5 feet, and the maximum area is 87.5 * 87.5 = 7656.25 square feet. 36. For the rectangular pen built along the river, only three sides of fence are needed. Let x be the width (parallel to the river) and y be the length (perpendicular to the river). The fencing equation is x + 2y = 540. To maximize area (A = xy), we need to find the optimal dimensions. By setting y = (540 - x)/2 and substituting into the area equation, we get A = x(270 - x/2). The maximum area occurs when x = 270, so y = 135. The maximum enclosed area is 270 * 135 = 36,450 square feet. 37.

For the rectangular pen with 1000 feet of fencing material and divided into three equal sections, let x be the width and y be the length of each section. The fencing equation is 3x + 4y = 1000. To maximize area (A = 3xy), we need to find the optimal dimensions. Setting y = (1000 - 3x)/4 and substituting into the area equation, we get A = 3x(250 - 3x/4). The maximum area occurs when x = 100, so y = 150. The maximum enclosed area is 3 * 100 * 150 = 45,000 square feet.

To know more Ostrich about click here .

brainly.com/question/2288317

#SPJ11

This is the expression's condensed form.

(P2q2) * [r / (1 – 3p6)]

We can simplify the expression by using the properties of exponents and basic algebra.

First, we can simplify the numerator:

P2qr0 * p0q = P2 * p0 * q1 * q1 = P2q2

Next, we can simplify the denominator:

1r – 3p6q0r = 1/r – 3p6 * q0 * r1 = 1/r – 3p6/r

Combining the numerator and denominator, we get:

(P2q2) / (1/r – 3p6/r)

To simplify further, we can factor out 1/r from the denominator:

(P2q2) / [(1 – 3p6) / r]

Finally, we can invert the fraction in the denominator and multiply:

(P2q2) * [r / (1 – 3p6)]

For similar question on expression.

https://brainly.com/question/96123

#SPJ11

There are 11 empty seats on the bus.

What is row-column?

A row and column are terms used to describe the arrangement of data in a table, matrix or spreadsheet.

A row is a horizontal arrangement of data in a table. It is identified by a number or a name, and it typically contains related data.

If the school bus has 22 rows of seats, and each row can seat 4 students, then the total number of seats on the bus is:

22 rows x 4 seats per row = 88 seats

If 19 rows of seats are already filled with students, then the number of seats filled is:

19 rows x 4 seats per row = 76 seats

There is one seat remaining in the 20th row. Therefore, the total number of filled seats is:

76 seats + 1 seat = 77 seats

The number of empty seats on the bus is the difference between the total number of seats and the number of filled seats, which is:

88 seats - 77 seats = 11 seats

So there are 11 empty seats on the bus.

To learn more about row-column visit the link:

https://brainly.com/question/25740584

#SPJ9

Answer: B, C, and D

Step-by-step explanation:

It is not A or E those are false. It is B, C, and D if you check the graph those are right.

The indefinite integral of 1/ x2 − 18x + 100 dx is ln|√[(x − 9)2 − 19]| + C.

To find the indefinite integral of 1/ x2 − 18x + 100 dx, we first need to rewrite the denominator as a perfect square. We can do this by completing the square:
x2 − 18x + 100 = (x − 9)2 − 19

Now we can rewrite the integral as:

∫ 1/[(x − 9)2 − 19] dx

Next, we can make the substitution u = x − 9. This gives us:

∫ 1/(u2 − 19) du

To evaluate this integral, we can use the substitution v = √(u2 − 19). Then, dv/du = u/√(u2 − 19), and we can write:

∫ 1/(u2 − 19) du = ∫ dv/v

Integrating this expression gives:

ln|v| + C

Substituting back in for u and v, we get:

ln|√[(x − 9)2 − 19]| + C

Learn more about  indefinite integral: https://brainly.com/question/27419605

#SPJ11

When rounding to the nearest whole number, there were approximately 93 bacteria after 5 hours.

All positive integers from 0 to infinity are included in the group of numbers known as whole numbers. The number line has these numbers. They are all genuine numbers as a result. Although not all real numbers are whole numbers, we can say that all whole numbers are real numbers. As a result, the set of natural numbers plus zero can be used to define whole numbers. The category of whole numbers and the negative of natural numbers is known as integers. Hence, integers can be either positive or negative, including 0. Natural numbers, whole numbers, integers, and fractions all fall under the category of real numbers.

To find the number of bacteria in the culture after 5 hours, we can use the given formula: B = 100 - 1.32t. We need to substitute t with 5 and solve for B:

B = 100 - 1.32(5)
B = 100 - 6.6
B = 93.4

When rounding to the nearest whole number, there were approximately 93 bacteria after 5 hours.

To learn more about whole numbers visit:

brainly.com/question/29766862

#SPJ11

The margin of error is 0.069, The sample mean is 0.611.

Part 1: To find the margin of error, we need to know the confidence level and the sample size. Assuming a 95% confidence level and an unknown sample size, we can use the formula:

Margin of error = (upper limit - lower limit) / 2 * z

where z is the z-score for the desired confidence level, which is 1.96 for a 95% confidence level.

Margin of error = (0.680 - 0.542) / 2 * 1.96

Margin of error = 0.069

Therefore, the margin of error is 0.069.

Part 2:

The sample mean is the midpoint of the confidence interval, which is the average of the upper and lower limits:

Sample mean = (upper limit + lower limit) / 2

Sample mean = (0.680 + 0.542) / 2

Sample mean = 0.611

Therefore, the sample mean is 0.611.

Learn more about  sample mean

https://brainly.com/question/31101410

#SPJ4

The initial value problem of equivalent integral equation is:

1) Given initial value problem is:

[tex]\frac{dy}{dx} =x+y[/tex]

y(x) = [tex]e^x[/tex] , y = 1

The equivalent integral equation is,

[tex]y = y_o + \int\limits^x_0 {(s+e^s)} \, dx \\[/tex]

Then by pieard's method,

[tex]y = 1 + \int\limits^x_0 {(s+e^s)} \, dx \\= 1+\int\limits^0_xsds+\int\limits^x_0 {e^s} \, dx[/tex]

[tex]= 1+\frac{x^2}{2} +e^x[/tex]

y(x) = [tex]e^{x^2}[/tex] -1

y(x) = x²

2) The given initial value problem is,

[tex]\frac{dy}{dx} =x+y[/tex]

y(x) = 1+x

The equivalent integral equation is,

[tex]y = y_o + \int\limits^x_0 {(s+e^s)} \, dx \\[/tex]

Then by pieard's method,

[tex]y = 1 + \int\limits^x_0 {(s+1+s)} \, dx \\\\= 1+\int\limits^0_x {(1+2s)} \, dx \\= 1+[s]^x_0+2[\frac{s^2}{2} ]^x_0\\=1+x+x^2[/tex]

y(x) = 1+x+2[[tex]e^x-x-1[/tex]]

3) The given initial value problem is,

[tex]\frac{dy}{dx} =cosx[/tex]

y(x) = cosx

The equivalent integral equation is,

[tex]y = y_o + \int\limits^x_0 {(s+e^s)} \, dx \\[/tex]

Then by pieard's method,

[tex]y = 1 + \int\limits^x_0 {(s+cos s)} \, dx \\\\= 1+\frac{x^2}{2}+sinx \\ = (sinx-x)+1+x+\frac{x^2}{2}[/tex]

y = -sinx - x + [tex]\frac{x^3}{3!}[/tex] + 1 +x + x² + x³/3! + x⁴/3!

Leran more

We have shown that {f+g(xn)} converges to f+g(x0) in V, and f+g is continuous at x0.

To show that f + g is continuous at x0 ∈ M using the sequential criterion, let {xn} be a sequence in M that converges to x0. We need to show that {f+g(xn)} converges to f+g(x0) in V.

Since f and g are continuous at x0, we know that {f(xn)} and {g(xn)} both converge to f(x0) and g(x0), respectively.

Thus, we have two convergent sequences {f(xn)} and {g(xn)}, and we can use the algebraic properties of limits to show that {f(xn) + g(xn)} converges to f(x0) + g(x0).

Specifically, let ε > 0 be given. Since f and g are continuous at x0, there exist δ1, δ2 > 0 such that d(x, x0) < δ1 implies ∥f(x) - f(x0)∥ < ε/2 and d(x, x0) < δ2 implies ∥g(x) - g(x0)∥ < ε/2. Choose δ = min{δ1, δ2}.

Now, let N be such that d(xn, x0) < δ for all n ≥ N. Then we have:

∥(f+g)(xn) - (f+g)(x0)∥ = ∥f(xn) + g(xn) - f(x0) - g(x0)∥
≤ ∥f(xn) - f(x0)∥ + ∥g(xn) - g(x0)∥        (by the triangle inequality for norms)
< ε/2 + ε/2 = ε

Therefore, we have shown that {f+g(xn)} converges to f+g(x0) in V, and hence f+g is continuous at x0.

To learn more about continuous functions visit: brainly.com/question/30552168

#SPJ11

There are 19,304,011,200 ways to distribute the 52 cards deck if we want to give 17 cards to Sara, 17 cards to Jacob, and 18 cards to their mom.

We can approach this problem using the concept of combinations. We need to choose 17 cards out of 52 for Sara, 17 cards out of the remaining 35 for Jacob, and 18 cards out of the remaining 18 for their mom.

The total number of ways to distribute the deck of 52 cards is given by

52! / (17! × 17! × 18!)

This is because there are 52! ways to order the 52 cards in the deck, but we need to divide by the number of ways to order the cards within each group (Sara's, Jacob's, and their mom's), which is given by 17! × 17! × 18!.

Using a calculator, we can simplify this expression to get

4,712,697,790,400 / (17 × 17 × 18)

This evaluates to

19,304,011,200

Learn more about combinations here

brainly.com/question/28720645

#SPJ4

Yes, a 6-pointed star has both line symmetry and rotational symmetry.

Symmetry is a property of an object, shape, or pattern that remains unchanged when subjected to a transformation, such as a reflection, rotation, or translation.

Yes, a 6-pointed star has both line symmetry and rotational symmetry.

Line symmetry (also called reflection symmetry) occurs when a shape can be divided into two halves that are mirror images of each other. A 6-pointed star can be divided into two halves along any line passing through the center of the star, and the two halves will be mirror images of each other. Therefore, a 6-pointed star has line symmetry.

Rotational symmetry occurs when a shape can be rotated by a certain angle and still look the same. A 6-pointed star has rotational symmetry of order 6, which means that it can be rotated by 60 degrees (or a multiple of 60 degrees) and still look the same. If we rotate a 6-pointed star by 60 degrees, we get the same star shape. If we rotate it by another 60 degrees, we get the same shape again, and so on, until we have rotated it by a total of 360 degrees (6 times 60 degrees). Therefore, a 6-pointed star has rotational symmetry of order 6.

To know more about symmetry visit:

https://brainly.com/question/29044130

#SPJ1

Answer:

I believe that the correct answer would be A) 170t = 4050 - 100t

Step-by-step explanation:

With "t" meaning time we can put it next to 170 and with 100.

However, because 170t is filling up, we don't add a negative sign in the front; this is the opposite for 100t since it drains instead of filling.

Equation: 170t, -100t

Now since 170t is a different expression from the other two terms we will have to put an equal sign to separate the two.

Equation: 170t = -100t

For the Second part of the equation, we first add 4050 since it's the starting amount and NOT the change in amount.

Equation: 170t = 4050, -100t

We then put -100t at the end of 4050 since it's draining from 4050.

Equation: 170t = 4050 - 100t

I hope that this was helpful!

The possible of choices to place the 10 positions by choosing players from the 13 people who went is 1,287,600.

To find the possible number of ways to assign the 10 positions by selecting players from the 13 people who show up, we need to use the principles of permutation and combination.

therefore, the principle of  permutation and combination can be used to derive a formula

[tex]P(n,r) = \frac{n!}{(n-r)!}[/tex]

here,

n = total number of players coming

r = is the number of position made

placing the given values in the given formula

[tex]P(13,10) = \frac{13!}{(13-10)!}[/tex]

[tex]= \frac{13!}{3!}[/tex]

[tex]=1,28,600[/tex]

The possible of choices to place the 10 positions by choosing players from the 13 people who went is 1,287,600.

To learn more about  permutation and combination,

https://brainly.com/question/28065038

#SPJ4

The answer is 55 possible selections of 4 books from this shelf that include at least one paperback. Option D (55) is the correct answer.

To answer your question regarding the possible selections of 4 books from a shelf with 8 books (2 paperbacks and 6 hardbacks) that include at least one paperback, we'll use combinatorics.
Calculate the total possible combinations of selecting 4 books out of 8 without any conditions:
This can be calculated using the combination formula, C(n, r) = n! / (r! * (n-r)!), where n is the total number of books (8) and r is the number of books to be selected (4).
C(8, 4) = 8! / (4! * (8-4)!) = 70
Calculate the total possible combinations of selecting 4 hardback books only:
Here, n is the total number of hardbacks (6) and r is the number of books to be selected (4).
C(6, 4) = 6! / (4! * (6-4)!) = 15
Calculate the number of combinations that include at least one paperback:
Since we know the total combinations and the combinations with hardbacks only, we can subtract the latter from the former to get the number of combinations with at least one paperback.
Number of combinations with at least one paperback = Total combinations - Combinations with hardbacks only = 70 - 15 = 55
So, there are 55 possible selections of 4 books from this shelf that include at least one paperback.

for more questions on combinations

https://brainly.com/question/28065038

#SPJ11

Cell frequencies computed under the assumption that the null hypothesis is true are called Expected frequencies. The correct answer is option C.

Learn more about expected frequencies: https://brainly.com/question/23866673

#SPJ11

The value of a is [tex]a=-3x_{1}+2x_{2}+6[/tex] adn the the critical point of the

[tex]x^{'}_{1}=ax_{1}+2x_{2}+5a=0[/tex] has no value for the systme.

A crucial point is a location on the graph of a function, such as (c, f(c)), where the derivative is either 0 or undefined. So how does the derivative relate to a vital point,

We are aware that the derivative f'(x) at a given place is what determines the slope of a tangent line to the line y = f(x) at that location. We already know that a function's critical point has either a horizontal tangent or a vertical tangent.

Critical point of the sysytem is calculaed as in following manner :

[tex]x^{'}_{1}=ax_{1}+2x_{2}+5a=0[/tex]         ................(1)

[tex]x^{'}_{2}=-3x_{1}+2x_{2}+6-a=0[/tex]   ............  (2)

so, applying [tex]3\times equation(1)+a\times equation(2)[/tex]  we get,

[tex]2x_{2}(3+a)+21a-a^{2}[/tex]

[tex]=0\Rightarrow x_{2}[/tex]

[tex]=\frac{(a^{2}-21a)}{2(3+a)}[/tex]

putting above value in equation (1) we get

[tex]x_{1}=\frac{-1}{a}[2x_{2}+5a][/tex]

[tex]=\frac{-1}{a}[\frac{(a^{2}-21a)}{(3+a)}+5a][/tex]

[tex]=\frac{6-6a}{a+3}[/tex]

Putting the value of x1 and x2 in equation (2) to get value of a as:

[tex]a=-3x_{1}+2x_{2}+6[/tex]

[tex]=\frac{18a-18}{a+3}+\frac{a^{2}-21a}{a+3}+6[/tex]

[tex]=\frac{a^{2}+3a}{a+3}[/tex]

[tex]\Rightarrow a(a+3)=a^{2}+3a\Rightarrow a(3+a)=a(3+a)[/tex],

which suggest there are no value of a for the given system.

Learn more about Critical point:

https://brainly.com/question/29144288

#SPJ4

The correct comparison is C. -2 > -7. the inequality of the -2 is greater then -7.

Inequality refers to the state of being unequal or not equal in some respect. It can refer to various forms of disparities or differences, such as differences in income, wealth, education, opportunities, health, or social status, among others. Inequality can occur between individuals, groups, communities, or nations, and it can be caused by various factors, such as discrimination, historical legacies, social structures, policies, or economic systems. Inequality is often considered a social problem because it can lead to social tension, unrest, and injustice, as well as undermine economic growth and human development.

Option A (-9 > 4) is incorrect because -9 is a smaller value than 4, so it is false.

Option B (-6 > -5) is also incorrect because -6 is a smaller value than -5, so it is false.

Option D (7 < 3) is incorrect because 7 is a larger value than 3, so it is false.

Therefore, option C (-2 > -7) is the correct comparison because -2 is a larger value than -7, so it is true.

To know more about inequality, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/30231190

#SPJ1

The volume of Prism Y is 9 3/10 ft³

Dilation is a transformation in geometry that changes the size of an object but leaves its shape unchanged. It involves stretching or shrinking an object by a certain scale factor in all dimensions.

To find the volume of the prism we need to find the scale factor using the given heights of both prisms

Here we have

Prism X is a dilation of Prism Y.

The height of Prism X is 10 1/3 ft, and the volume of Prism X is 74 2/5 ft³. The height of Prism Y is 5 1/6 ft.

Since Prism X is a dilation of Prism Y, the ratio of their corresponding side lengths is the same as the ratio of their corresponding volumes.

Let the scale factor between Prism X and Prism Y be k.

Then, the height of Prism X is k times the height of Prism Y.

=> k = height of Prism X / height of Prism Y = (10 1/3) ft / (5 1/6) ft

To simplify this fraction, convert the mixed numbers to improper fractions:

k = (31/3) ft / (31/6) ft

k = 2

Therefore, Prism X is twice the size of Prism Y in all dimensions.

So, the volume of Prism Y is:

The volume of Prism Y = Volume of Prism X / k³

= (74 2/5) ft³ / 2³ = (74 2/5) ft³ / 8 = 9 3/10 ft³

Therefore,

The volume of Prism Y is 9 3/10 ft³

Learn more about Dilation at

https://brainly.com/question/27166024

#SPJ9

Answer:

65°

Step-by-step explanation:

The integral of 17/√x (5-2√x) dx is 17(5√x - x) + C.

To find the integral of the given function 17/√x (5-2√x) dx, we will use the substitution method for integration.

1. First, let u = √x. Then, x = u² and du = (1/2) * (1/√x) dx.

2. Next, substitute u into the function and the dx term:
  ∫17/u (5-2u) ((2du)).

3. Simplifying the expression:
  ∫17(5-2u) du.

4. Now, we integrate the simplified function with respect to u:
  ∫17(5-2u) du = 17∫(5-2u) du.

5. Performing the integration:
  17(5u - u²) + C, where C is the constant of integration.

6. Finally, substituting back the original variable x:
  17(5√x - (√x)²) + C.

The integral of the given function 17/√x (5-2√x) dx is equal to 17(5√x - x) + C.

Learn more about Integration : https://brainly.com/question/25500577

#SPJ11

There is no quantity that minimizes SRATC for this firm. The minimum point on the SRATC curve does not exist.

To find the value of q that minimizes the short-run average total cost (SRATC) for a perfectly competitive firm with a short-run total cost curve of 200q + 2q^2, we need to follow these steps:
1. Calculate the average total cost (ATC) by dividing the total cost (TC) by q: ATC = (200q + 2q^2) / q.
2. Simplify the ATC equation: ATC = 200 + 2q.
3. Find the derivative of ATC with respect to q to determine the slope: d(ATC)/dq = 2.
4. Set the derivative equal to zero to find the minimum point: 2 = 0.
In this case, there is no solution for q, as the derivative of ATC with respect to q is a constant (2) and does not equal zero. Therefore, there is no value of q that minimizes the SRATC in this scenario.

To know more about SRATC visit:

https://brainly.com/question/15186674

#SPJ11

In the short run, Ike's Bikes currently produces bicycles using only one factory. However, the company is considering expanding production to two or even three factories in the long run. The table provided shows the company's short-run average total cost (SRATC) each month for different levels of production using different numbers of factories.

In the short run, the average total cost (ATC) depends on the level of production and the number of factories used. As the number of factories increases, the company is able to produce more bicycles, which leads to economies of scale. This means that the average total cost decreases as production increases.

In the long run, the company has the flexibility to choose the optimal number of factories for a given level of production. By considering the costs associated with each factory, including fixed costs and variable costs, Ike's Bikes can determine the most cost-effective production setup.

For example, if Ike's Bikes produces 100 bicycles per month using one factory, the short-run average total cost might be $100 per bicycle. However, if the company expands production to two factories, the short-run average total cost could decrease to $90 per bicycle due to economies of scale. Similarly, with three factories, the short-run average total cost could further decrease to $80 per bicycle.

In summary, the costs in the short run versus the long run depend on the number of factories used for production. In the short run, the company's average total cost decreases as production increases due to economies of scale. In the long run, Ike's Bikes can choose the optimal number of factories to minimize costs and improve efficiency.

To learn more about (SRATC), visit here:

https://brainly.com/question/31429305

#SPJ11

Putting everything together, we have det(M) = det(A)det(D - cI) = det(A)(det(M)/det(A)) = det(M). Therefore, det(M) = det(A), as desired.

You do not need to use induction to prove this statement. Here is a proof:

First, recall that the determinant of a block matrix can be computed as follows: if M = (), where A is an n × n matrix and B is an n × m matrix, then det(M) = det(A)det(D - [tex]BC^-1[/tex]), where C is an m × n matrix, B is an n × m matrix, and D is an m × m matrix.

Now, suppose that M = () is given, where A is an n × n matrix and B, C, and D are matrices with appropriate dimensions. We want to show that det(M) = det(A).

First, note that B and C are both column vectors, so [tex]BC^-1[/tex] is a scalar multiple of the identity matrix I. Thus, we can write det([tex]D - BC^-1[/tex]) = det(D - cI), where c is the scalar corresponding to [tex]BC^-1.[/tex]

Next, note that M can be written as (), where A is an n × n matrix and D - cI is an m × m matrix. By the formula for the determinant of a block matrix, we have det(M) = det(A)det(D - cI).

Finally, note that D - cI is invertible if and only if D - [tex]BC^-1[/tex] is invertible (since they differ by a scalar multiple of I), so det(D - cI) = det(D - [tex]BC^-1[/tex]). But D - [tex]BC^-1[/tex]is just the matrix obtained by deleting the first n columns of M, so by the formula for the determinant of a block matrix again, we have det(D - BC^-1) = det(M)/det(A).

Learn more about block matrix

https://brainly.com/question/30002874

#SPJ4

Due to the complexity of the series, it's difficult to determine which Comparison Test to use without further information. As a result, we cannot definitively conclude whether the series is convergent or divergent.

To test the convergence or divergence of the given series using the Alternating Series Test, we first need to identify bn and evaluate the limit. The series is given as: ∑(-1)^n * ln(7n), where n = 2 to ∞
Here, bn = ln(7n).
Now, let's evaluate the limit: lim (n→∞) bn = lim (n→∞) ln(7n)
Since the natural logarithm function is increasing and 7n goes to infinity as n goes to infinity, the limit is also infinity: lim (n→∞) ln(7n) = ∞
Now, let's apply the Alternating Series Test:
1. The limit of bn as n goes to infinity must be 0. However, in this case, it's not, as we found that the limit is ∞.
2. The sequence bn must be non-increasing, i.e., bn ≥ bn+1 for all n.
Since the first condition is not satisfied, we cannot use the Alternating Series Test to determine the convergence or divergence of the series. Instead, we'll need to use a different test, such as the Comparison Test. Unfortunately, due to the complexity of the series, it's difficult to determine which Comparison Test to use without further information. As a result, we cannot definitively conclude whether the series is convergent or divergent.

Learn more about Alternating Series Test here, https://brainly.com/question/30400869

#SPJ11

The value of the sides are;

x = 44.9

y = 22.5

z = 55.1

To determine the lengths of the sides of the triangle, we should take into considerations the different trigonometric identities, we have;

Using the sine identity, we have;

sin θ = opposite/hypotenuse

Substitute the values, we get;

sin 45 = 39/x

cross multiply x = 55. 1

Then,

cos 45 = n/55.1

n = 38.9

Using the sine rule,

sin 60 = 38.9/x

x = 44. 9

Also, using the cosine rule

cos 60 = y/44.9

y = 22.5

Learn about trigonometric ratios at: https://brainly.com/question/24349828

#SPJ1

Approximately <0.301,0.959> is the direction in which the maximum rate of change of f occurs at (16,5).

Learn More About Rate Of Change: https://brainly.com/question/8728504

#SPJ11

1. Inconsistent

2. Consistent

3. The graph of the system of equations is at B

4. The graph of the system of equations is at C

5. The solution of the equation is b

The system of equation required to be solved are

x - 9y = 2            ----1

3x - 3y = -10       ----2

Multiplying (1) by 3 and subtracting 2 from it

3x - 27y = 6

3x - 3y = -10  

0 - 24y = 16

solving for y

y = 16 / -24 = -2/3

solving for x by substituting y into 1

x - 9 * -2/3 = 2

x + 6 = 2

x = -4

hence the solution is (-4, -2/3)

Learn more about system of equation at

https://brainly.com/question/25976025

#SPJ1

The mistake you committed is while transposing -3 from LHS to the RHS you didn't consider its negative sign, which gets carried on with it to the RHS.

-3(x+9) = 21(x+9)=7x=-2 doesnt look like a valid expression of linear equation.

What I understand from your question is,

-3(x+9)=21

⇒(x+9)=7

⇒x = -2

So what's the mistake?

Now, the original linear equation is,

-3(x+9)=21

As -3 is multiplied with the LHS, when we transpose it to RHS, the equation becomes,

x+9=21÷(-3)

⇒x+9 = -7

⇒x= -7-9

    = -16

So, the correct answer is -16.

The mistake you committed is while transposing -3 from the LHS to the RHS you didn't consider its negative sign, which gets carried on with it to the RHS.

For more questions on linear equation,

https://brainly.com/question/26260688

https://brainly.com/question/29876954