Select all fractions that describe the model below. A. 4 6 of the bars are green. B. 1 3 of the bars are blue. C. 2 8 of the bars are blue. D. 3 4 of the bars are green. E. 3 2 of the bars are green.

Each cross street is 500 m far apart from each other.

Given that a scenario of three streets, Washington Street and N. South St. is 3.2 km long from the north.

There are no cross streets for the first 1.2 km then there are four cross streets each an equal distance apart,

So,

We need to find the distance between each street,

3.2-1.2 = 2 km

Therefore, all the 4 streets collectively are of length 2 km,

Since, each of them have equal distance so,

4s = 20 [say s is the length of one street]

s = 0.5 km

s = 500 meters

Hence, each cross street is 500 m far apart from each other.

Learn more about equations, click;

https://brainly.com/question/29538993

#SPJ1

Step-by-step explanation:

35 %   means you pay 65%   or  .65

if x is the original price   the discounted price is  $  .65 x

The formula for finding the number of permutations of n objects with identical items is n! / (n1! * n2! * ... * nr!).

To find the number of permutations of n objects where n1, n2, ..., nr items are identical, we can use the formula:
n! / (n1! * n2! * ... * nr!)
Here, n is the total number of objects and n1, n2, ..., nr are the number of identical items in each group.
This formula works by first finding the total number of permutations of all n objects, which is n!.

However, we need to adjust for the fact that some objects are identical. We divide by the factorial of the number of identical objects in each group, to avoid overcounting.For example, if we have 6 objects and 2 pairs of identical objects (n1 = n2 = 2), the formula gives:
6! / (2! * 2! * 2!) = 15 permutations
This means there are 15 different ways to arrange the 6 objects, taking into account the identical pairs.

To know more about permutations  click here

brainly.com/question/1216161

#SPJ11

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Using the inclusion-exclusion principle, we can find the number of students who play at least one of the games as follows:

Number of students who play at least one of the games = number of students who play football + number of students who play table tennis - number of students who play both games

= 16 + 12 - 5

= 23

Therefore, 23 students play at least one of the games.

To find the number of students who play none of the games, we can subtract the number of students who play at least one of the games from the total number of students:

Number of students who play none of the games = total number of students - number of students who play at least one of the games

= 31 - 23

= 8

Therefore, 8 students play none of the games.

The second right-most figure is recognized as the rectangular pyramid.

A rectangular pyramid may be a geometric strong that comprises of a rectangular base and four triangular faces that meet at a common vertex. It has a place in the family of pyramids, which are polyhedra with a polygonal base and triangular faces that meet at a common vertex.

The rectangular pyramid has five faces, counting the rectangular base, and five vertices. The triangular faces are consistent, which implies they have the same shape and measure, and they meet at the pinnacle, which is the best vertex of the pyramid.

Rectangular pyramids are commonly utilized in engineering and designing to make different structures such as buildings, bridges, and burrows. They are moreover utilized in science to educate geometry concepts, such as surface zone and volume.

The equation to calculate the surface zone of a rectangular pyramid is 2ab + (a × incline stature) + (b × incline stature),

where a and b are the base sides, and the incline stature is the remove from the summit to the base's midpoint.

The equation to calculate the volume of a rectangular pyramid is

(1/3) × (base region) × tallness,

where the base region is the zone of the rectangular base and the height is the remove from the base to the summit.  

To know more about rectangular pyramids refer to this :

https://brainly.com/question/27270944

#SPJ1

Greenhouse- Geisser correction required when you do not have sphericity.

The Greenhouse-Geisser correction is a statistical method used to adjust for violations of sphericity in repeated measures ANOVA.

Sphericity assumes that the variances of the differences between all possible pairs of repeated measures are equal. When this assumption is violated, the Greenhouse-Geisser correction can be used to adjust the degrees of freedom to account for the non-sphericity and provide more accurate p-values.

Therefore, the correction is required when you do not have sphericity.

Learn more about greenhouse:

https://brainly.com/question/27537929

#SPJ11

Paige bought 32 songs in a month.

Let's break down the cost components in terms of an equation:

The monthly membership fee is $5.

The cost of each song is $0.10.

The total monthly cost is $8.20.

Let s represent the number of songs Paige purchases in a month.

The equation can be written as:

5 + 0.10s = 8.20

This equation represents the total cost of Paige's membership fee plus the cost of the songs she purchases, which equals the total monthly cost of $8.20.

To find the number of songs she bought, we can solve this equation for s.

Subtracting 5 from both sides:

0.10s = 8.20 - 5

0.10s = 3.20

Dividing both sides by 0.10:

s = 3.20 / 0.10

s = 32

Know more about cost here;

https://brainly.com/question/30045916

#SPJ11

Answer:

i think its 18

Step-by-step explanation:

Systematic sampling and cluster sampling are examples of probability sampling methods used in human research. These methods are employed to ensure that each participant in the population has a known, non-zero chance of being selected, which helps in obtaining representative samples and drawing more accurate conclusions.

Systematic sampling and cluster sampling are both examples of probability sampling methods used in human research.

Probability sampling methods involve randomly selecting participants from a larger population, giving each individual an equal chance of being selected.

Systematic sampling involves selecting every nth participant from a list of the population, while cluster sampling involves dividing the population into clusters or groups and then randomly selecting entire clusters to include in the study.

These methods are considered to be more representative and unbiased than non-probability sampling methods, which do not involve random selection and may not accurately reflect the characteristics of the population.

For similar question on probability.

https://brainly.com/question/12344616

#SPJ11

To solve this problem, we can use the Poisson distribution, which models the number of events that occur in a fixed period of time, given the average rate of occurrence.

a. To find the probability that at most 425 people are struck by lightning in a year, we can use the Poisson distribution with a mean of 400. The formula for the Poisson distribution is:
P(X ≤ k) = e^-λ ∑_(i=0)^k (λ^i/i!)
where X is the random variable (the number of people struck by lightning in a year), λ is the mean (400), and k is the maximum number of people we're interested in (425). Plugging in the values, we get:
P(X ≤ 425) = e^-400 ∑_(i=0)^425 (400^i/i!) = 0.8855
So the probability that at most 425 people are struck by lightning in a year is 0.8855, or about 88.55%.
b. To find the probability that at least 375 people are struck by lightning in a year, we can use the complement rule: the probability of an event happening is 1 minus the probability of the event not happening. So in this case, we want to find the probability that fewer than 375 people are struck by lightning, and subtract that from 1 to get the probability of at least 375 people being struck.
P(X ≥ 375) = 1 - P(X < 375) = 1 - e^-400 ∑_(i=0)^374 (400^i/i!) = 0.9369
So the probability that at least 375 people are struck by lightning in a year is 0.9369, or about 93.69%.
It's important to note that these probabilities are based on the assumption that the number of people struck by lightning in a year follows a Poisson distribution with a mean of 400. This may not be a perfect model, but it's a reasonable approximation based on the available data. Additionally, the chances of being struck by lightning are still relatively low - even at the high end of our estimates, only about 0.1% of the US population would be affected.

Based on the given information of 400 people being struck by lightning in the United States on average each year, we can calculate the probabilities for the scenarios you mentioned.
a. The probability that at most 425 people are struck by lightning in a year:
To calculate this, we'll need to know the distribution of people being struck by lightning, which isn't provided. However, let's assume it follows a normal distribution with a mean of 400 and some standard deviation. In this case, we would calculate the z-score for 425 people and find the corresponding probability from the z-table. Unfortunately, without the standard deviation, we cannot compute the exact probability.
b. The probability that at least 375 people are struck by lightning in a year:
Similarly, to calculate this probability, we'd need the standard deviation to find the z-score for 375 people and then find the corresponding probability from the z-table. Again, without the standard deviation, we cannot compute the exact probability.
In conclusion, without knowing the standard deviation or the distribution of people being struck by lightning, we cannot provide a precise probability for the given scenarios.

Visit here to learn more about Poisson distribution:

brainly.com/question/17280826

#SPJ11

The output for the given inputs 6, 8, and 9 is 1, 3, and 4 respectively.

Based on the given input-output relationship, we can see that the output is obtained by subtracting 5 from the input. Let's apply this rule to the given inputs:

Input: 6

Output: 6 - 5 = 1

Input: 8

Output: 8 - 5 = 3

Input: 9

Output: 9 - 5 = 4

Know more about input-output relationship here:

https://brainly.com/question/30186033

#SPJ11

Answer:

--------------------

Perimeter is the sum of three side lengths.

Use the sum and known sides to find the missing side:

Substitute sides for P and solve for ?:

The missing side is x² + 3x + 5 units.

Conducting multiple t-tests on the same DV inflates the  experiment wise alpha.

When conducting multiple t-tests on the same dependent variable, there is an increased probability of committing a Type I error, which is rejecting the null hypothesis when it is actually true. This is because the more tests that are performed, the more likely it is that one or more of them will produce a significant result by chance alone.

The per comparison alpha is the probability of committing a Type I error on a single test, which is typically set at 0.05 (or 0.01) level of significance. When multiple tests are conducted, the probability of committing a Type I error across all tests, known as the experiment-wise alpha, increases. This means that the overall likelihood of falsely rejecting at least one null hypothesis increases with each additional test.

Therefore, it is important to adjust the alpha level for multiple comparisons using appropriate statistical techniques, such as Bonferroni correction or False Discovery Rate (FDR) control. These methods help to maintain a desirable experiment-wise error rate and control the risk of falsely rejecting the null hypothesis.

Learn more about multiple t-tests

brainly.com/question/30006011

#SPJ11

The equation of the quadratic function is:

f(x) = 4(x + 2)^2 - 3

To determine the equation of a quadratic function, we can start with the general form of a quadratic equation:

f(x) = ax^2 + bx + c

Given that the quadratic function has a minimum at (-2, -3), we know that the vertex of the parabola is at (-2, -3). The x-coordinate of the vertex gives us the value of the line of symmetry, which is also the value of the x-coordinate at the minimum point. Thus, we have:

x = -2

To find the coefficient "a" of the quadratic function, we can use the fact that the vertex form of a quadratic function is given by:

f(x) = a(x - h)^2 + k

where (h, k) is the vertex. Substituting the values of the vertex (-2, -3) into the vertex form, we get:

f(x) = a(x - (-2))^2 + (-3)

f(x) = a(x + 2)^2 - 3

Now, we can use the fact that the quadratic function passes through the point (-1, 1). Substituting these coordinates into the equation, we get:

1 = a(-1 + 2)^2 - 3

1 = a(1)^2 - 3

1 = a - 3

a = 4

Know more about quadratic function here;

https://brainly.com/question/30929439

#SPJ11

Area of small sector is 1620 square meters and Area of large sector  is 12960 square meters

Area of sector = 1/2r²θ

r is the radius of the circle which is 9cm

The area of small and large sectors we have to find

Small sector has θ value of 40 degrees

and large sector has 320 degrees

Area of small sector = 1/2(9)²×40

=1/2×81×40

=1620 square meters

Area of large sector = 1/2(9)²×320

=81×160

=12960 square meters

Hence, area of small sector is 1620 square meters and Area of large sector  is 12960 square meters

To learn more on Circles click:

https://brainly.com/question/11833983

#SPJ1

The level of significance chosen for this hypothesis testing is 5%. In this hypothesis testing scenario, the null hypothesis (H0) is that the population proportion (P) is equal to 0.25 and the alternative hypothesis (Ha) is that P is not equal to 0.25.

The P-value is 0.094, which is the probability of observing a sample proportion at least as extreme as the one obtained if the null hypothesis were true.

Since the test rejected the null hypothesis, it means that the P-value is less than the chosen level of significance (alpha), indicating that the data provides enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis. Therefore, the alpha level chosen for this test must be greater than 0.094.

The only answer choice that satisfies this condition is C, where alpha = 5%. This means that there is a 5% chance of rejecting the null hypothesis when it is actually true. In other words, the level of significance chosen for this hypothesis testing is 5%.

Learn more about hypothesis here:

brainly.com/question/29537948

#SPJ11

So Simon has [tex]7/10[/tex] of the original cakes left.

Simon gives 1/5 of the cakes to Sali:

= 30 * 1/5

= 6 cakes.

Simon gives 10% of the cakes to Jane:

= 10% * 30

= 3 cakes.

The total number of cakes Simon gives away is:

=  6 + 3

= 9 cakes.

So, Simon is left with 30 - 9 = 21 cakes.

To express this as a fraction of the original 30 cakes, we will simplify as:

= 21/30

= 7/10.

Read more about fraction

brainly.com/question/17220365

#SPJ1

To find the mean number of calls per hour, we divide the average number of calls per day by 24:

Mean number of calls per hour = 19.2/24 = 0.8

a) To find the probability that in a randomly selected hour the number of calls is exactly 2, we use the Poisson distribution formula:

P(X = 2) = (e^-0.8)*(0.8^2)/(2!) = 0.213

b) To find the probability that in a randomly selected hour the number of calls is more than 2, we can use the complement rule and subtract the probability of getting 0, 1, or 2 calls from 1:

P(X > 2) = 1 - P(X = 0) - P(X = 1) - P(X = 2)

P(X > 2) = 1 - (e^-0.8)*(0.8^0)/(0!) - (e^-0.8)*(0.8^1)/(1!) - (e^-0.8)*(0.8^2)/(2!)

P(X > 2) = 0.579

c) To find the probability that in a randomly selected hour the number of calls is less than 2, we add the probabilities of getting 0 or 1 call:

P(X < 2) = P(X = 0) + P(X = 1)

P(X < 2) = (e^-0.8)*(0.8^0)/(0!) + (e^-0.8)*(0.8^1)/(1!)

P(X < 2) = 0.264.

Learn more about mean:

https://brainly.com/question/1136789

#SPJ11

The solution for the equation AB=BC is A = B(CB⁻¹), given that B is invertible.To solve the equation AB=BC for A, assuming that A, B, and C are square matrices and B is invertible, follow these steps:

1. Since B is invertible, it means it has an inverse matrix, denoted as B⁻¹.
2. To isolate A, you can multiply both sides of the equation by the inverse of B.
3. Multiply B⁻¹ to the right side of both equations: (AB)B⁻¹= (BC)B⁻¹.

4. Remember that matrix multiplication is associative, so you can rearrange the parentheses: A(BB⁻¹) = B(CB⁻¹).
5. Since the product of a matrix and its inverse is the identity matrix (I), we have AI = B(CB⁻¹).
6. As multiplying by the identity matrix doesn't change the original matrix, we can simplify the equation to A = B(CB⁻¹).
Now, you have isolated A, and the solution for the equation AB=BC is A = B(CB⁻¹).

To know more about square matrices  click here

brainly.com/question/31398671

#SPJ11

If a 10-ft vertical post casts a 20-in shadow at the same time a nearby cell phone tower casts a 120-ft shadow. The height of the cell phone tower is 0.6 inches.

The proportion is:

(Height of post) / (Shadow length of post) = (Height of tower) / (Shadow length of tower)

Where:

Height of post = 10 ft

Shadow length of post = 20 in (convert to feet: 20 / 12 = 5/3 ft)

Shadow length of tower = 120 ft

So, the proportion is:

(10 ft) / (5/3 ft) = (Height of tower) / (120 ft)

Cross-multiply:

10 * (3/5) = (Height of tower) * 120

Simplify:

6 = (Height of tower) * 120

solve for the height of the tower:

Height of tower = 6 / 120 = 1/20 ft

Since the answer is in feet let's convert it to inches:

1/20 ft * 12 in/ft = 0.6 inches

Therefore, the height of the cell phone tower is 0.6 inches.

Learn more about height here:https://brainly.com/question/73194

#SPJ1

To find the height of the cell phone tower, we can set up a proportion based on the similar triangles formed by the post and its shadow, and the tower and its shadow. By cross-multiplying and solving for x, we find that the cell phone tower is 60 ft tall.

To find the height of the cell phone tower, we can set up a proportion based on the similar triangles formed by the post and its shadow, and the tower and its shadow. Let's call the height of the cell phone tower x ft. From the given information, we have:

(10 ft / 20 in) = (x ft / 120 ft)

Now, we can cross-multiply and solve for x:

(10 ft) * (120 ft) = (20 in) * (x ft)

1200 ft = 20x ft

To isolate x, we divide both sides of the equation by 20:

1200 ft / 20 = x ft

60 ft = x ft

Therefore, the cell phone tower is 60 ft tall.

https://brainly.com/question/14846653

#SPJ1

At Woodbridge Middle School's annual concert, 6 classical tunes were played.

The given ratio of popular to classical tunes played is 2:3, which means that for every 2 popular tunes played, 3 classical tunes were played. Let's assume that the number of popular tunes played is '2x' (since the ratio of popular to classical tunes is 2:3) and the number of classical tunes played is '3x'. Therefore, the total number of tunes played is:

2x + 3x = 5x

We are given that the total number of popular and classical tunes played is 10, so we can write:

5x = 10

Dividing both sides by 5, we get:

x = 2

Therefore, the number of popular tunes played is:

2x = 2 x 2 = 4

And the number of classical tunes played is:

3x = 3 x 2 = 6

So, at Woodbridge Middle School's annual concert, 6 classical tunes were played.

Learn more about Woodbridge here

https://brainly.com/question/18922181

#SPJ11

The number of home runs that Homer would need to hit next season to have a 12-year mean of 60 is given as follows:

98.

The mean of a data-set is given by the sum of all observations in the data-set divided by the number of observations, which is also called the cardinality of the data-set.

The sum of the observations, considering next year's amount as x, is given as follows:

25 + 49 + 51 + 52 + 56 + 58 + 62 + 64 + 65 + 68 + 72 + x = 622 + x.

Hence, for a mean of 60, the value of x is obtained as follows:

(622 + x)/12 = 60

622 + x = 720

x = 98.

More can be learned about the mean of a data-set at https://brainly.com/question/1136789

#SPJ1

It will take 20 months for Loren and Jessica to have the same amount in their savings accounts.

Loren's savings account doubles every month, so we can use the formula for compound interest to figure out how long it will take to reach $10,000:

$10,000 = $0.01 * 2ⁿ

1,000,000 = 2ⁿ

n = log2(1,000,000) ≈ 20

It will take Loren 20 months to reach $10,000 in her savings account.

During that same time period, Jessica's account will have grown by $275/month * 20 months = $5,500.

the amount of money in Jessica's account after 20 months will be:

$17.88 + $5,500 = $5,517.88

Learn more about account on

https://brainly.com/question/26498002

#SPJ1

For ð inputs, there can be an infinite number of subsets of those features. This is because a subset is a collection of some or all of the features within the inputs. Therefore, the number of possible subsets is determined by the number of possible ways in which we can choose from the available features.

For instance, if we have three features within an input, we can create subsets of one, two, or all three features. This gives us a total of seven possible subsets. However, this is not the only way in which we can create subsets. We can also create subsets that contain no features or any combination of features, which increases the number of possible subsets even further.

Therefore, the total number of possible subsets for ð inputs is limitless. It is important to note that not all subsets will be relevant or useful, but the more subsets we have, the more options we have for creating effective models or making informed decisions based on the inputs and features.

learn more about subsets here: brainly.com/question/20161144

#SPJ11

For ð inputs, there can be an infinite number of subsets of those features. This is because a subset is a collection of some or all of the features within the inputs. Therefore, the number of possible subsets is determined by the number of possible ways in which we can choose from the available features.

For instance, if we have three features within an input, we can create subsets of one, two, or all three features. This gives us a total of seven possible subsets. However, this is not the only way in which we can create subsets. We can also create subsets that contain no features or any combination of features, which increases the number of possible subsets even further.

Therefore, the total number of possible subsets for ð inputs is limitless. It is important to note that not all subsets will be relevant or useful, but the more subsets we have, the more options we have for creating effective models or making informed decisions based on the inputs and features.

learn more about subsets here: brainly.com/question/20161144

#SPJ11

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

I can't tell you the answer because I don't have the protractor at hand, and different size screens will make the measurement wrong. But I can tell you how to solve it. Move the protractor so that point S is in the middle of the protractor (there is a hole in the protractor in the bottom middle). ST is not straight, so make sure you rotate the protractor a little bit to make it line up. Then, read the protractor from the bottom right up in a circular motion and stop when you see the line SR. Finally, you read what number is on the protractor right on the line SR. That will be your degree of RST.

The equation that represents the situation is y = 2x + 1062

From the question, we have the following parameters that can be used in our computation:

x     y

3   1032

5   1072

7   1112

9   1152

A linear equation is represented as

y = mx + c

Using the points, we have

3m + c = 1032

5m + c = 1072

So, we have

2m = 40

Divide

m = 2

Next, we have

5(2) + c = 1072

This gives

c = 1062

So, the equation is

y = 2x + 1062

Hence, the equation that represents the situation is y = 2x + 1062

Read more about linear relation at

https://brainly.com/question/30318449

#SPJ1

(g) and Theorem 5 are not equivalent.

Are (g) and Theorem 5 equivalent?

You are correct. Statement (g) in Theorem 8, which states that the equation Ax = b has at least one solution for each b in R", includes both the case of a unique solution and the case of infinitely many solutions.

Therefore, (g) is not equivalent to Theorem 5, which specifically states that the equation Ax = b has a unique solution x = A^(-1)b when A is an invertible matrix. The equivalence mentioned in the text seems to be an error or a misinterpretation.

The correct interpretation is that Theorem 5 implies statement (g) in Theorem 8, but the converse is not necessarily true.

Learn more about Theorem

brainly.com/question/30066983

#SPJ11