Show that all points the curve on the tangent surface of are parabolic.

The correct option is:

c. y¹ = 3 + √(x - 7)

To find the inverse function of y = (x - 3)^2 + 7 for x > 3, we can follow these steps:

Step 1: Replace y with x and x with y in the given equation:

x = (y - 3)^2 + 7

Step 2: Solve the equation for y:

x - 7 = (y - 3)^2

√(x - 7) = y - 3

y - 3 = √(x - 7)

Step 3: Solve for y by adding 3 to both sides:

y = √(x - 7) + 3

So, the inverse function of y = (x - 3)^2 + 7 for x > 3 is y¹ = √(x - 7) + 3.

Therefore, the correct option is:

c. y¹ = 3 + √(x - 7)

Learn more about inverse function here

https://brainly.com/question/29141206

#SPJ11

a. The distribution of individual runner's time (X) is approximately normal (X ~ N).

b. The distribution of the sample mean (ȳ) of 9 runners is also approximately normal (ȳ ~ N).

c. The distribution of the sample mean difference (∆ȳ) is also approximately normal (∆ȳ ~ N).

d. To find the probability of a randomly selected runner's time falling between 19.2 and 20.2 minutes, calculate the corresponding z-scores and find the area under the standard normal curve between those z-scores.

e. The Central Limit Theorem states that the distribution of the sample mean approaches normality for large sample sizes. Therefore, the probability of the average time of 9 runners falling between 19.2 and 20.2 minutes can be calculated using z-scores and the standard normal distribution.

f. To determine the probability of a randomly selected 9-person team having a total time less than 174.6 minutes, calculate the z-score and find the corresponding probability using the standard normal distribution.

g. Yes, the assumption of normality is necessary for parts e) and f) because they rely on the properties of the normal distribution and the Central Limit Theorem.

h. To find the longest total time allowing a relay team to make it to the championship round (top 15%), calculate the z-score corresponding to the 15th percentile and convert it back to the original scale using the population mean (20 minutes) and standard deviation (2.2 minutes).

a. The distribution of X (individual runner's time) is approximately normal (X ~ N).

b. The distribution of the sample mean (average time of 9 runners) is also approximately normal (ȳ ~ N).

c. The distribution of the sample mean difference (∆ȳ) is also approximately normal (∆ȳ ~ N).

d. To find the probability that a randomly selected runner's time will be between 19.2 and 20.2 minutes, we need to calculate the z-scores for these values and then find the area under the standard normal curve between those z-scores.

Using the formula:

z = (x - μ) / σ

For 19.2 minutes:

z1 = (19.2 - 20) / 2.2

For 20.2 minutes:

z2 = (20.2 - 20) / 2.2

Next, we can use a standard normal distribution table or a calculator to find the probabilities corresponding to these z-scores. The probability of the runner's time being between 19.2 and 20.2 minutes is the difference between these probabilities.

e. To find the probability that the average time of the 9 runners is between 19.2 and 20.2 minutes, we can use the Central Limit Theorem. Since the sample size is large enough (n = 9), the distribution of the sample mean approaches a normal distribution, regardless of the shape of the population distribution.

We can calculate the z-scores for the given values and then find the corresponding probabilities using a standard normal distribution table or a calculator.

f. To find the probability that the randomly selected 9-person team will have a total time less than 174.6 minutes, we need to calculate the z-score for this value and then find the corresponding probability using a standard normal distribution table or a calculator.

g. Yes, the assumption of normality is necessary for parts e) and f) because we are using the properties of the normal distribution and the Central Limit Theorem to make inferences about the sample mean and the sample mean difference.

h. To determine the longest total time that a relay team can have and still make it to the championship round (top 15%), we need to find the z-score corresponding to the 15th percentile. This z-score represents the cutoff point for the top 15% of the distribution. We can then convert the z-score back to the original scale using the formula:

x = μ + z * σ

where μ is the population mean (20 minutes) and σ is the population standard deviation (2.2 minutes). This will give us the longest total time that allows the relay team to make it to the championship round.

Learn more about distribution here :-

https://brainly.com/question/29664127

#SPJ11

The formula for standard deviation is: Standard deviation = √(Σ(X - μ)2 / N).

The researcher designs a questionnaire to measure sexism so that she can test the participants' level of sexism before and after the intervention. She tests one version of the questionnaire with 45 statements and a shorter version with 12 statements. In both questionnaires, the participants respond to each statement with a rating on a 5-point Likert scale, with O equaling "strongly disagree" and 4 equaling "strongly agree."The overall score for each participant is the mean of his or her ratings for the different statements on the questionnaire. This method of computing scores uses a 5-point Likert scale with a range from 0 to 4. To visualize the variability, we need to calculate the range, variance, and standard deviation.The formula for the range is: Range = Maximum score – Minimum score. The formula for variance is: Variance = ((Σ(X - μ)2) / N), where Σ is the sum of, X is the data value, μ is the mean, and N is the number of observations.

Learn more about standard deviation here :-

https://brainly.com/question/29115611

#SPJ11

The research question involves the usage of a questionnaire with a Likert scale to gather data on sexism levels. The mean of the participants' ratings represents their average sexism level. The mathematical subject applicable here is statistics, where the mean and variability of these scores are studied.

The researcher's work appears to involve both aspects of sociology and psychology, but the maths behind her questionnaire design firmly falls within the field of statistics. The questionnaire is an instrument for data collection. In this case, the researcher is using it to gather numerical data corresponding to participants' level of sexism. The Likert scale is a commonly used tool in survey research that measures the extent of agreement or disagreement with a particular statement. Each statement on the questionnaire is scored from 0 to 4, indicating the degree to which the participant agrees with it.

The mean of these scores provides an average rating of sexism for each respondent, allowing the researcher to easily compare responses before and after the intervention. Variability in these scores could come from a range of factors, such as differing interpretations of the statements or variations in individual attitudes and beliefs about sexism. Statistics is the tool used to analyze these data, as it provides methods to summarize and interpret data, like calculating the mean, observing data variability, etc.

For more such questions on statistics, click on:

https://brainly.com/question/31538429

#SPJ2

Differentiating w with respect to t using the chain rule we get -12xcost - 14ysint. When we evaluate dw/dt at t=π4 we get -13.

i. Differentiate w with respect to t using the chain rule.

Substitute x and y in the given function by their values and differentiate with respect to t.

We getdw/dt =dw/dx × dx/dt + dw/dy × dy/dt    (1)

The differentials are:

dx/dt = -sint ,

dy/dt = cost,

dw/dx = -12x, and

dw/dy = -14y

Substituting these values in equation (1), we get

dw/dt = -12xcost - 14ysint    (2)

ii. Differentiate w directly with respect to t

Express x and y in terms of t.

We get,

x = cost,

y = sint

Substituting these values in the given function we get:

w = -6cos^2t - 7sin^2t

Now, differentiating w with respect to t, we get

dw/dt = d/dt[-6cos^2t - 7sin^2t]dw/dt

= 12cos(t)sin(t) - 14cos(t)sin(t)dw/dt

= -2cos(t)sin(t).....(3)

iii. Evaluate dw/dt at t=π/4

Substituting π/4 in equation (2) we get:

dw/dt = -12×cos(π/4)×sin(π/4) - 14×sin(π/4)×cos(π/4)dw/dt

= -12(1/2)(1/2) - 14(1/2)(1/2)dw/dt

= -6-7dw/dt

= -13

Therefore, dw/dt at t=π/4 is -13.

Learn more about chain rule -

brainly.com/question/30895266

#SPJ11

The correct answer is 32.

In an integer optimization problem with binary variables, each variable can take one of two possible values: 0 or 1. Therefore, for 5 binary variables, each variable can be assigned either 0 or 1, resulting in 2 possible choices for each variable. The maximum number of potential solutions in an integer optimization problem with 5 binary variables is 32 because each binary variable can take on 2 possible values (0 or 1)

In this case, we have 5 binary variables, so the maximum number of potential solutions is given by 2 * 2 * 2 * 2 * 2, which simplifies to 2^5. Calculating 2^5, we find that the maximum number of potential solutions is 32.

Learn more about Integer optimization here

https://brainly.com/question/29980674

#SPJ11

(3Q)^(t) = 3Q^(t) this expression can be concluded as true.

The given matrix is Q = [2 3][1 -2]

To prove that (3Q)^(t) = 3Q^(t),

we need to calculate the transpose of both sides of the equation.

Let's solve it step by step as follows:

(3Q)^(t)

First, we will calculate 3Q which is;

3Q = 3[2 3][1 -2]= [6 9][-3 6]

Then we will calculate the transpose of 3Q as follows;

(3Q)^(t) = [6 9][-3 6]^(t)= [6 9][-3 6]= [6 -3][9 6]Q^(t)

Now we will calculate Q^(t) which is;

Q = [2 3][1 -2]

So,

Q^(t) = [2 1][3 -2]

Therefore, we can conclude that (3Q)^(t) = 3Q^(t) is true.

Learn more about transpose at https://brainly.com/question/2263930

#SPJ11

The degree of the numerator is greater than the degree of the denominator. So, there is no horizontal asymptote. Therefore, the given function has no horizontal asymptote. The oblique asymptote is found by dividing the numerator by the denominator using long division. The graph of the function is graph{x^2(8x^2+26x-7)/(4x-1) [-10, 10, -5, 5]}

Given rational function is:

R(x) = (8x² + 26x - 7) / (4x - 1)To find the vertical, horizontal, and oblique asymptotes, if any, of the rational function, follow these steps:

Step 1: Find the Vertical Asymptote The vertical asymptote is the value of x which makes the denominator zero. Thus, we solve the denominator of the given function as follows:4x - 1 = 0  

⇒ x = 1/4

Therefore, x = 1/4 is the vertical asymptote of the given function.

Step 2: Find the Horizontal Asymptote

The degree of the numerator is greater than the degree of the denominator.

So, there is no horizontal asymptote.

Therefore, the given function has no horizontal asymptote.

Step 3: Find the Oblique Asymptote The oblique asymptote is found by dividing the numerator by the denominator using long division.

8x² + 26x - 7/4x - 1

= 2x + 7 + (1 / (4x - 1))

Therefore, y = 2x + 7 is the oblique asymptote of the given function.

Step 4: Graph of the Function The graph of the function is shown below:

graph{x^2(8x^2+26x-7)/(4x-1) [-10, 10, -5, 5]}

The vertical asymptote is the value of x which makes the denominator zero. Thus, we solve the denominator of the given function. The degree of the numerator is greater than the degree of the denominator. So, there is no horizontal asymptote. Therefore, the given function has no horizontal asymptote. The oblique asymptote is found by dividing the numerator by the denominator using long division. The graph of the function is shown above.

To know more about numerator visit:

https://brainly.com/question/7067665

#SPJ11

- Fixed cost: $4000, Marginal cost per item: $2.8, Price: $4

To identify the fixed cost, marginal cost per item, and the price at which the item is sold, we can analyze the given functions.

1. Fixed cost:
The fixed cost refers to the cost that remains constant regardless of the quantity produced or sold. In this case, the fixed cost is represented by the constant term in the total cost function. Looking at the equation C = 4000 + 2.8q, we can see that the fixed cost is $4000.

2. Marginal cost per item:
The marginal cost per item represents the additional cost incurred when producing or selling one more item. To find the marginal cost per item, we need to calculate the derivative of the total cost function with respect to the quantity (q).

Differentiating the total cost function C = 4000 + 2.8q with respect to q, we get:
dC/dq = 2.8

Therefore, the marginal cost per item is $2.8.

3. Price:
The price at which the item is sold is represented by the revenue per item. Looking at the revenue function R = 4q, we can see that the price at which the item is sold is $4.

To know more about " Fixed cost, Marginal cost , Price "

https://brainly.com/question/30165613

#SPJ11

Proved: a)sinxsin2x + cosxcos2x = cosx is true for all values of x.   b) cotx = sinxsin(π/2−x) + cos2xcotx is true for all values of x.    c)  2csc^2x = secx cscx is true for all values of x.

To prove a trigonometric identity, we need to manipulate the expressions using known identities until we obtain an equation that is true for all values of the variable.

1. To prove sinxsin2x + cosxcos2x = cosx:

We will use the identity sin(A + B) = sinAcosB + cosAsinB.

Let's apply this identity to the left-hand side of the equation:
sinxsin2x + cosxcos2x
= sinx(cosx + cos3x) + cosx(1 - 2sin^2x)
= sinxcosx + sinxcos3x + cosx - 2cosxsin^2x
= cosx(sinxcosx + sin3xcosx) + cosx - 2cosxsin^2x
= cosx(sinxcosx + sin3xcosx) - 2cosxsin^2x + cosx
= cosx(sinxcosx + sin3xcosx - 2sin^2x + 1)
= cosx[2sinxcosx + (1 - 2sin^2x)]
= cosx[2sinxcosx + cos^2x - sin^2x]
= cosx[cos^2x + 2sinxcosx - sin^2x]
= cosx[cos(2x) + 2sinxsin(2x)]
= cosx[cos(2x) + sin(2x)]
= cosxcos(2x) + cosxsin(2x)
= cosx.

Therefore, sinxsin2x + cosxcos2x = cosx is true for all values of x.

2. To prove cotx = sinxsin(π/2−x) + cos2xcotx:

We will use the identity cotx = cosx/sinx and the Pythagorean identity sin^2x + cos^2x = 1.

Let's manipulate the right-hand side of the equation:
sinxsin(π/2−x) + cos2xcotx
= sinxcosx/sinx + cos^2x(cosx/sinx)
= cosx + cos^3x/sinx
= cosx(1 + cos^2x/sinx)
= cosx(1 + cos^2x/(√(1 - sin^2x)))
= cosx(1 + cos^2x/√(1 - cos^2x))
= cosx(1 + cos^2x/√(sin^2x))
= cosx(1 + cos^2x/sinx)
= cosx(1 + cot^2x)
= cosx + cosx(cot^2x)
= cosx(1 + cot^2x)
= cotx.

Therefore, cotx = sinxsin(π/2−x) + cos2xcotx is true for all values of x.

3. To prove 2csc^2x = secx cscx:

We will use the identity cscx = 1/sinx and secx = 1/cosx.

Let's manipulate the left-hand side of the equation:
2csc^2x
= 2(1/sinx)^2
= 2/sin^2x
= 2/(1 - cos^2x)
= 2/(1 - cos^2x)/(1/cosx)
= 2cosx/(cos^2x - cos^4x)
= 2cosx/(cos^2x(1 - cos^2x))
= 2cosx/(cos^2xsin^2x)
= 2cosx/sin^2x
= 2cot^2x.

Therefore, 2csc^2x = secx cscx is true for all values of x.

In conclusion, we have proven the given trigonometric identities using known trigonometric identities and algebraic manipulation.

To know more about "trigonometric identities"

https://brainly.com/question/7331447

#SPJ11

The percent decrease in Val's fund from last quarter to this quarter is 14.4%

To calculate the percent decrease in Val's mutual fund from last quarter to this quarter, we can use the following formula:

Percent Decrease = (Change in Value / Initial Value) * 100

Given that last quarter her fund was worth $37,500 and this quarter it is worth $32,100, we can calculate the change in value:

Change in Value = Initial Value - Final Value

= $37,500 - $32,100

= $5,400

Now we can plug these values into the formula for percent decrease:

Percent Decrease = (5,400 / 37,500) * 100

= 0.144 * 100

= 14.4%

Therefore, the percent decrease in Val's fund from last quarter to this quarter is 14.4%.

This means that the value of Val's mutual fund decreased by 14.4% over the given time period. It is important to note that this calculation assumes a simple percentage decrease based on the initial and final values and does not take into account any additional factors such as fees or dividends.

Learn more about: percent decrease

https://brainly.com/question/2913116

#SPJ11

Answer: 0.86 or 86%

Step-by-step explanation:

To calculate the probability that a new insured with an unknown accident history will be accident-free in the second year of coverage, we can use conditional probability.

Let's define the following events:

A: Insured had no accidents last year

B: Insured is accident-free this year

Given information:

i) P(A) = 0.70 (probability that a new insured had no accidents last year)

ii) P(B | A) = 0.80 (probability that an insured who was accident-free last year will be accident-free this year)

iii) P(B | A') = 0.60 (probability that an insured who was not accident-free last year will be accident-free this year)

We want to find P(B), which is the probability that an insured is accident-free this year, regardless of their accident history last year.

We can use the law of total probability to calculate P(B):

P(B) = P(A) * P(B | A) + P(A') * P(B | A')

P(B) = 0.70 * 0.80 + (1 - 0.70) * 0.60

P(B) = 0.56 + 0.30

P(B) = 0.86

Therefore, the probability that a new insured with an unknown accident history will be accident-free in the second year of coverage is 0.86.

(a) f(x) = 2 for all x in R is a function from R to R.

(b) f(x) = √x is not a function from R to R because it is undefined for negative values of x.

(c) The set {(x, y) | x = y², x = 0} is not a function from R to R because it violates the vertical line test.

(d) The set {(x, y) | x = y³} is a function from R to R.

(a) The function f(x) = 2 for all x in R is a constant function. It assigns the value 2 to every real number x. Since there is a well-defined output for every input, it is a function from R to R.

(b) The function f(x) = √x represents the square root function. However, it is not defined for negative values of x because the square root of a negative number is not a real number. Therefore, it is not a function from R to R.

(c) The set {(x, y) | x = y², x = 0} represents a parabola opening upwards. For every y-coordinate, there are two corresponding x-coordinates, one positive and one negative, except at x = 0. This violates the vertical line test, which states that a function must have a unique output for each input. Therefore, this set is not a function from R to R.

(d) The set {(x, y) | x = y³} represents a cubic function. For every real number y, there is a unique corresponding x-coordinate, given by y³. This satisfies the definition of a function, as there is a well-defined output for each input. Thus, this set is a function from R to R.

Learn more about function here:

https://brainly.com/question/30721594

#SPJ11

The equation of the function that results from shifting the parent function three units to the right is g(x) = x + 8.

To shift the parent function f(x) = x + 5 three units to the right, we need to subtract 3 from the input variable x. This will offset the graph horizontally to the right. Therefore, the equation of the shifted function, g(x), can be written as g(x) = (x - 3) + 5, which simplifies to g(x) = x + 8. The constant term in the equation represents the vertical shift. In this case, since the parent function has a constant term of 5, shifting it to the right does not affect the vertical position, resulting in g(x) = x + 8. This equation represents a function that is the same as the parent function f(x), but shifted three units to the right along the x-axis.

Learn more about function here :

brainly.com/question/30721594?

#SPJ11

The complete question is : Write the equation of a function whose parent function, f(x)=x+5, is shifted 3 units to the right. g(x)=x+3 g(x)=x+8 g(x)=x-8 g(x)=x-2

The vector field F(x, y, z) is conservative. The potential function for the given vector field is Φ(x, y, z) = 2/3 x³ + 2/3 y³ - (x² + y²)z + C.

To show that a vector field is conservative, we need to check if its curl is zero. If the curl of the vector field is zero, it implies that the vector field can be expressed as the gradient of a scalar function, which is the potential.

Given the vector field:

F(x, y, z) = 2x²i + 2y²j - (x² + y²)k

To find the curl of this vector field, we can use the curl operator:

∇ x F = (∂F₃/∂y - ∂F₂/∂z)i + (∂F₁/∂z - ∂F₃/∂x)j + (∂F₂/∂x - ∂F₁/∂y)k

Computing the partial derivatives:

∂F₁/∂x = 4x

∂F₁/∂y = 0

∂F₁/∂z = 0

∂F₂/∂x = 0

∂F₂/∂y = 4y

∂F₂/∂z = 0

∂F₃/∂x = -2x

∂F₃/∂y = -2y

∂F₃/∂z = 0

Substituting these values into the curl expression, we have:

∇ x F = (0 - 0)i + (0 - 0)j + (0 - 0)k

= 0i + 0j + 0k

= 0

Since the curl of the vector field is zero, we can conclude that the vector field F(x, y, z) is conservative.

To find the potential function, we need to integrate the components of the vector field. Since the curl is zero, the potential function can be found by integrating any component of the vector field. Let's integrate the x-component:

∫ F₁ dx = ∫ 2x² dx = 2/3 x³ + C₁(y, z)

Where C₁(y, z) is the constant of integration with respect to y and z.

Similarly, integrating the y-component:

∫ F₂ dy = ∫ 2y² dy = 2/3 y³ + C₂(x, z)

Where C₂(x, z) is the constant of integration with respect to x and z.

Finally, integrating the z-component:

∫ F₃ dz = ∫ -(x² + y²) dz = -(x² + y²)z + C₃(x, y)

Where C₃(x, y) is the constant of integration with respect to x and y.

The potential function, Φ(x, y, z), can be obtained by combining these integrated components:

Φ(x, y, z) = 2/3 x³ + 2/3 y³ - (x² + y²)z + C

Where C is a constant of integration.

Therefore, the potential function for the given vector field is Φ(x, y, z) = 2/3 x³ + 2/3 y³ - (x² + y²)z + C.

Lear more on potential function at

brainly.com/question/26978411

#SPJ11

They rode 15 miles before replacing each horse.

Let's assume that each rider rode a different number of horses, denoted as x, y, and z respectively. Since they used a total of 16 horses, we have the equation x + y + z = 16.

Since they rode the same number of miles on each horse, let's denote the distance traveled by each horse as d. Therefore, the total distance covered by all the horses can be calculated as 16d.

We are given that the three riders rode a total of 240 miles. Therefore, we have the equation xd + yd + z*d = 240.

From the given information, we have two equations:

x + y + z = 16 (Equation 1)

xd + yd + z*d = 240 (Equation 2)

Since we need to find the number of miles they rode before replacing each horse, we need to find the value of d. To solve this system of equations, we can substitute one variable in terms of the others.

Let's assume x = 16 - y - z. Substituting this into Equation 2, we get:

(16 - y - z)d + yd + z*d = 240

Simplifying, we have:

16d - yd - zd + yd + zd = 240

16d = 240

d = 240/16

d = 15

For more such questions on miles

https://brainly.com/question/29806974

#SPJ8

Answer:

(please be aware that the answers are not ordered in abc!)

a. a = 120

c. a = 210

e. a = 105

g. a = 225

b. a = 72

d. a = 49

f. a = 160

h. a = 288

Step-by-step explanation:

Since we are given a base and height on all of these triangles, the formula you can use to solve for the area (a) is [tex]a = \frac{1}{2} * h * b[/tex], where h = height and b = base.

Simply plug your height and base values into the formula and solve.

(a) The 99% confidence interval for the selling price-list price difference is approximately -$16,636 to $9,889.

(b) This suggests that housing prices can vary significantly, with potential discounts or premiums compared to the listed price.

(a) Based on the provided data, the 99% confidence interval for the difference between the selling price and list price (selling price - list price) is approximately (-$16,636 to $9,889) rounded to the nearest dollar. This interval notation represents the range within which we can estimate the true difference to fall with 99% confidence.

(b) Interpreting the confidence interval in terms of the housing market, it means that we can be 99% confident that the actual difference between the selling price and list price of homes lies within the range of approximately -$16,636 to $9,889. This interval reflects the inherent variability in housing prices and the uncertainty associated with estimating the exact difference.

In the housing market, the confidence interval suggests that while the selling price can be lower than the list price by as much as $16,636, it can also exceed the list price by up to $9,889. This indicates that negotiations and market factors can influence the final selling price of a property. The wide range of the confidence interval highlights the potential variability and fluctuation in housing prices.

It is important for buyers and sellers to be aware of this uncertainty when pricing properties and engaging in real estate transactions. The confidence interval provides a statistical measure of the range within which the true difference between selling price and list price is likely to fall, helping stakeholders make informed decisions and consider the potential variation in housing market prices.

For more such information on: selling price

https://brainly.com/question/26008313

#SPJ8

Answer:

The correct answer is:

||u|| = 18.439; θ = 130.601°

The magnitude of the vector u is 18.439 and its direction is 130.601°. These values come from the formulae for the magnitude and direction of a vector, given its initial and terminal points.

The initial and terminal points of vector u decide its magnitude and direction. The magnitude of the vector ||u|| can be calculated using the distance formula which is √[(x2-x1)²+(y2-y1)²]. The direction of the vector can be found using the inverse tangent or arctan(y/x), but there are adjustments required depending on the quadrant.

Given the initial point (4, 8) and terminal point (–12, 14), we derive the magnitude as √[(-12-4)²+(14-8)²] = 18.439, and the direction θ as atan ((14-8)/(-12-4)) = -49.399°. However, since the vector is in the second quadrant, we add 180° to the angle to get the actual direction, which becomes 130.601°. Therefore, ||u|| = 18.439; θ = 130.601°.

https://brainly.com/question/35891441

#SPJ2

The parabola opens upward because the coefficient of the quadratic term is positive.

This part of the question concerns the quadratic function y = x² + 18x + 42.

To write the quadratic expression x² + 18x + 42 in completed-square form, we need to complete the square for the quadratic term.

We can do this by adding and subtracting the square of half the coefficient of the linear term.

Using the completed-square form from part (c)(i), we can solve the equation (x + 9)² - 39 = 0.

Therefore, the solutions to the equation x² + 18x + 42 = 0 are x = -9 + √39 and x = -9 - √39.

The vertex of the parabola y = x² + 18x + 42 is located at the value of x that corresponds to the minimum or maximum of the quadratic function.

In completed-square form, the vertex coordinates can be determined by taking the opposite of the constant term inside the parentheses.

To sketch the graph of the parabola y = x² + 18x + 42, we can plot the vertex (-9, -39) and draw a smooth curve passing through the vertex.

Learn more about quadratic term

brainly.com/question/32055901

#SPJ11

The sum of 5500 mm, 720 cm, 90 dm, and 20 dam can be expressed in meters as 58.2 meters. To convert the given measurements to a common unit, we need to convert each unit to meters and then add them together.

1 meter is equal to 1000 millimeters (mm), 100 centimeters (cm), 10 decimeters (dm), and 0.1 decameters (dam).

Converting the given measurements to meters:

5500 mm = 5500/1000 = 5.5 meters

720 cm = 720/100 = 7.2 meters

90 dm = 90/10 = 9 meters

20 dam = 20 * 0.1 = 2 meters

Now, we can add these converted measurements together:

5.5 meters + 7.2 meters + 9 meters + 2 meters = 23.7 meters

Therefore, the sum of 5500 mm, 720 cm, 90 dm, and 20 dam in meters is 23.7 meters.

Learn more about meters:

https://brainly.com/question/29367164

#SPJ11

Answer:

B=54

C=54

Step-by-step explanation:

180-72=108

108/2=54

54*2=108

108+72=180

Answer:

x = 6

Step-by-step explanation:

the 3 angles in a triangle sum to 180°

sum the 3 angles and equate to 180

7x + 8 + 102 + 28 = 180

7x + 138 = 180 ( subtract 138 from both sides )

7x = 42 ( divide both sides by 7 )

x = 6

        In this question, we need to calculate the proportion of sizes in 100   rolls, repeated 100 times.

        Then we can use the formula to calculate the interval containing the middle 95% of the data based on the data from the simulation.

         Finally, we can compare the observed proportion with the margin of error of the simulation results.

         P  =  20/100  =  0.2

       Mean  P and Standard Deviation:  √P(1 - P)/n  Where n is the sample size.

      √0.2(1 - 0.2)/100 = 0.04

        m  =  1.96 *  0.04/√100 = 0.008

        (0.2  -  m, 0.2 + m)  =  (0.192,  0.208)

       The interval containing the middle 95% of the data based on the data from the simulation is:  (0.192,  0.208 ), and the observed proportion is within the margin of error of the simulation results.

Hope it helps!

Answer: H

Step-by-step explanation:  The answer is G because H is farther from the circle and G is the closest.

Answer:

[tex]54c^3+68c^2-72c[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

[tex]6c(9c^2+11c-12)+2c^2\\=(6c)(9c^2)+(6c)(11c)+(6c)(-12)+2c^2\\=54c^3+66c^2-72c+2c^2\\=54c^3+68c^2-72c[/tex]

Answer:

$408.73

Step-by-step explanation:

To determine how much more the SUV will be worth than the car five years after their model years, we first need to calculate how much the car is worth five years after its model year.

The value of the car (in dollars, x years from its model year) can be predicted by the function f(x):

[tex]f(x)= 12000(0.89)^x[/tex]

Therefore, to calculate how much the car will be worth five years after its model year, substitute x = 5 into the given function f(x):

[tex]\begin{aligned}x=5 \implies f(5)&=12000(0.89)^5\\&=12000(0.5584059449)\\&=6700.8713388\\&=6700.87\; \sf (nearest\;hundredth) \end{aligned}[/tex]

Therefore, the car will be worth $6,700.87 five years from its model year.

From observation of the given table, the SUV will be worth $7,109.60 five years from its model year.

To calculate how much more the SUV will be worth than the car five years from their model years, subtract the amount the car will be worth from the amount the SUV will be worth:

[tex]7109.60-6700.87=408.73[/tex]

Therefore, the SUV will be worth $408.73 more than the car five years after their model years.

Answer:

$408.73

Step-by-step explanation:

To determine how much more the SUV will be worth than the car five years after their model years, we first need to calculate how much the car is worth five years after its model year.

The value of the car (in dollars, x years from its model year) can be predicted by the function f(x):

Therefore, to calculate how much the car will be worth five years after its model year, substitute x = 5 into the given function f(x):

Therefore, the car will be worth $6,700.87 five years from its model year.

From observation of the given table, the SUV will be worth $7,109.60 five years from its model year.

To calculate how much more the SUV will be worth than the car five years from their model years, subtract the amount the car will be worth from the amount the SUV will be worth:

Therefore, the SUV will be worth $408.73 more than the car five years after their model years.

Answer:

(g ￮ f)(x) = x² + 8x + 15

Step-by-step explanation:

to find (g ￮ f)(x) substitute x = f(x) into g(x)

(g ￮ f)(x)

= g(f(x))

= g(x + 4)

= (x + 4)² - 1 ← expand factor using FOIL

= x² + 8x + 16 - 1 ← collect like terms

= x² + 8x + 15

Answer:

c = 13.8

Step-by-step explanation:

[tex]c^2=a^2+b^2-2ab\cos C\\c^2=19^2+26^2-2(19)(26)\cos 31^\circ\\c^2=190.1187069\\c\approx13.8[/tex]

Therefore, the length of c is about 13.8 units

The given binary integer program represents a decision problem for selecting potential locations for new warehouses. The objective is to maximize the net present value, subject to several constraints. Let's analyze the program:

Objective:

Maximize 20x1 + 30x2 + 10x3 + 15x4

Decision Variables:

x1, x2, x3, x4 (binary variables representing the selection of each location)

Constraints:

Constraint 1: 5x1 + 7x2 + 12x3 + 11x4 ≤ 21

This constraint represents the limitation on the total budget/capital available for the new warehouses.

Constraint 2: x1 + x2 + x3 + x4 ≥ 2

This constraint ensures that at least two locations are selected for the new warehouses.

Constraint 3: x1 + x2 ≤ 1

This constraint limits the selection to a maximum of one location from the first two potential locations.

Constraint 4: x1 + x3 ≥ 1

This constraint ensures that at least one location is selected from the first and third potential locations.

Constraint 5: x2 = x4

This constraint imposes the condition that the selection of the second and fourth potential locations must be the same.

The binary variables x1, x2, x3, and x4 can take values of 0 or 1, indicating whether a particular location is selected or not.

The objective is to maximize the net present value of the decision while satisfying the budget constraint and the conditions for the number and specific locations of the warehouses. The values of x1, x2, x3, and x4 will determine the optimal selection of locations that maximize the objective function while meeting all the given constraints.

Learn more about warehouses here

https://brainly.com/question/23941356

#SPJ11

To calculate the mass of the load, we can use the equation W = m × g, where W is the weight, m is the mass, and g is the acceleration due to gravity. When we simplify this, we see that the burden weighs about 500 kg.

Given that the weight of the fully loaded lorry is 14700 N and the mass of the lorry is 500 kg, we can use these values to find the value of g.

Using the equation W = m × g, we can rearrange it to solve for g:

g = W / m

Substituting the given values, we have:

g = 14700 N / 500 kg

Calculating this, we find that g ≈ 29.4 m/s².

Now, to calculate the mass of the load, we can rearrange the equation W = m × g to solve for m:

m = W / g

Substituting the known values, we have:

m = 14700 N / 29.4 m/s²

Simplifying this, we find that the mass of the load is approximately 500 kg.

To know more about "Mass":

https://brainly.com/question/1838164

#SPJ11