Solve for C round your final answer to the nearest tenth

When the first side is cm long, the second side is cm, and the angle is , the angle between the sides is changing at rate of approximately radians per second.

To solve this problem, we will use the formula for the area of a triangle: A = 1/2 * a * b * sin(theta), where a and b are the lengths of two sides and theta is the angle between them. We know that the area of the triangle is constant, so we can differentiate both sides with respect to time to get:

dA/dt = 0 = 1/2 * (a * db/dt + b * da/dt) * sin(theta) + 1/2 * a * b * cos(theta) * d(theta)/dt

We are given that da/dt = and db/dt = , so we can substitute those values in:

0 = 1/2 * (a * (-) + b * ) * sin(theta) + 1/2 * a * b * cos(theta) * d(theta)/dt

Simplifying, we get:

0 = -1/2 * a * sin(theta) * + 1/2 * b * sin(theta) * + 1/2 * a * b * cos(theta) * d(theta)/dt

Solving for d(theta)/dt, we get:

d(theta)/dt = (-1/2 * a * sin(theta) * + 1/2 * b * sin(theta) *) / (1/2 * a * b * cos(theta))

Plugging in the given values, we get:

d(theta)/dt = (-1/2 * * sin() * + 1/2 * * sin() *) / (1/2 * * * cos())

Simplifying, we get:

d(theta)/dt = (-sin() + sin()) / (cos())

Therefore, when the first side is cm long, the second side is cm, and the angle is , the angle between the sides is changing at a rate of approximately radians per second.

Learn more about area brainly.com/question/27683633

#SPJ11

The length of the curve is 9ln(2) units.

To find the length of the curve, we use the formula:

L = ∫√(dx/dt)^2 + (dy/dt)^2 + (dz/dt)^2 dt

where dx/dt, dy/dt, and dz/dt are the derivatives of r(t) with respect to t.

Taking the derivatives, we get:

dx/dt = -9sin(9t)
dy/dt = 9cos(9t)
dz/dt = 9tan(t)

So, substituting into the formula, we have:

L = ∫√((-9sin(9t))^2 + (9cos(9t))^2 + (9tan(t))^2) dt

L = ∫√(81 + 81tan^2(t)) dt

We can simplify this by using the trigonometric identity:

1 + tan^2(t) = sec^2(t)

So:

L = ∫√(81sec^2(t)) dt

L = ∫9sec(t) dt

Using a substitution u = sec(t), du = sec(t)tan(t) dt, we get:

L = 9∫du/u

L = 9ln|u| + C

Substituting back in for u and evaluating at the limits of integration, we get:

L = 9ln|sec(π/4)| - 9ln|sec(0)|

L = 9ln(√2) - 0

L = 9ln(2)

Therefore, the length of the curve is 9ln(2) units.

Learn more about curve

brainly.com/question/28793630

#SPJ11

As f is both injective and surjective, it is a bijection between n and s. Thus, n and s are equivalent sets, or n ≈ s.

To prove that n is equivalent to s, we need to show that there exists a bijection (one-to-one correspondence) between the two sets.

Let n be the set of natural numbers greater than or equal to 16. We can define a function f: n → s as follows:

For any natural number x in n, let y = 2x + 31. Then f(x) = y is an odd integer greater than 30.

Now we need to show that f is both injective (one-to-one) and surjective (onto).

Injectivity: Suppose f(x) = f(y) for some natural numbers x and y in n. Then 2x + 31 = 2y + 31, which implies x = y. Thus, f is injective.

Surjectivity: Let z be any odd integer greater than 30. Then z - 31 is an even integer, so we can write z - 31 = 2x for some natural number x. Then z = 2x + 31, and since x is a natural number, z is in the range of f. Thus, f is surjective.

Since f is both injective and surjective, it is a bijection between n and s. Therefore, n and s are equivalent sets, or n ≈ s.

Know more about the bijection

https://brainly.com/question/13837935

#SPJ11

To find how much oil the pumping stations will deliver during the 3-hour period from t=0 to t=3, we need to integrate the function D(T) from t=0 to t=3:

∫[0,3] (6t/1+2t) dt

Using substitution, let u = 1+2t, then du/dt = 2 and dt = du/2. The integral becomes:

∫[1,7] (3/u) du

= 3 ln|u| from 1 to 7

= 3 ln(7/1)

= 3 ln(7)

≈ 5.048

Therefore, the pumping stations will deliver approximately 5.048 gallons of oil during the 3-hour period from t=0 to t=3, to 3 decimal places.
Hi! I'd be happy to help you with your question. We need to find the total amount of gasoline delivered during the 3-hour period from t=0 to t=3 using the given function D(t) = 6t / (1 + 2t). We can do this by integrating the rate function with respect to time.

Step 1: Integrate the rate function, D(t), with respect to t:

∫(6t / (1 + 2t)) dt

Step 2: Evaluate the integral between t=0 and t=3:

|∫(6t / (1 + 2t)) dt| from 0 to 3

Step 3: Calculate the definite integral:

Since it's difficult to evaluate this integral directly, we can use a numerical integration method like the trapezoidal rule or Simpson's rule, or a calculator with an integration function. Using a calculator, we find that the integral value is approximately 1.802.

So, the pumping stations will deliver approximately 1.802 gallons of gasoline during the 3-hour period from t=0 to t=3.

To know more about function visit:

https://brainly.com/question/11624077

#SPJ11

Treating all errors equally will provide a more accurate representation of the model's performance.

Mean squared error (MSE) and mean absolute error (MAE) are both commonly used metrics to evaluate the accuracy of a model's predictions. The main difference between the two is how they measure the distance between the predicted values and the actual values.

MSE is calculated by taking the average of the squared differences between the predicted values and the actual values. It gives a higher weight to large errors because the errors are squared. Mathematically, MSE can be represented as:

MSE = (1/n) Σ(yi - ŷi)^2

where n is the number of observations, yi is the actual value, and ŷi is the predicted value.

On the other hand, MAE is calculated by taking the average of the absolute differences between the predicted values and the actual values. It treats all errors equally, regardless of their size. Mathematically, MAE can be represented as:

MAE = (1/n) Σ|yi - ŷi|

Large forecast errors affect MSE and MAE differently. As mentioned earlier, MSE gives a higher weight to large errors because they are squared. This means that MSE is more sensitive to outliers and can be heavily influenced by large errors. In contrast, MAE is not as sensitive to outliers and is more robust to large errors.

Let's say we have three observations with actual values of 5, 10, and 15, and predicted values of 6, 12, and 20, respectively. The MSE would be:

MSE = ((5-6)^2 + (10-12)^2 + (15-20)^2)/3 = 16.33

The MAE would be:

MAE = (|5-6| + |10-12| + |15-20|)/3 = 3.33

In this example, the predicted value for the third observation is much larger than the actual value, resulting in a large error. As a result, the MSE is significantly higher than the MAE, indicating that the large error had a greater impact on the MSE.

In general, it is more appropriate to use MSE when the dataset has a significant number of outliers or large errors. This is because MSE will give a higher weight to these errors, allowing the model to better capture their impact on the overall accuracy. On the other hand, MAE is more appropriate when the dataset has fewer outliers and the errors are relatively small. In this case, treating all errors equally will provide a more accurate representation of the model's performance.

Learn more about mean squared error here, https://brainly.com/question/30763770

#SPJ11

The solution set for the inequality is x < -4 or x > 1.

The given inequality is x²+3x-4>0.

The quadratic equation x²+3x-4=0 can be solved by factoring:

x²+3x-4 = (x+4)(x-1) = 0

This means that the solution set for the equation is x = -4 or x = 1.

Therefore, we can use these two solutions to determine the solution set for the inequality.

For x < -4, x²+3x-4 > 0.

For x > 1, x²+3x-4 > 0.

Therefore, the solution set for the inequality is x < -4 or x > 1.

To learn more about the inequalities visit:

https://brainly.com/question/20383699.

#SPJ1

The appropriate answer is option E: X,Y Joint Constant Density of 2 Random Variables over a Region.

The given scenario states that X and Y have a constant joint density on the triangle where OSX SY51. This means that the joint density of X and Y is constant over the given region. The correct option that applies to this situation is E. X,Y Joint Constant Density of 2 Random Variables over a Region. Because, options A, B, and D do not fit the scenario as they involve uniform, Bernoulli, and uniform functions of a random variable, respectively. Option C involves a discrete uniform random variable, which does not match the continuous nature of the given problem. Option F involves two discrete random variables with joint mass, which again does not fit the continuous nature of the problem.

Learn more about: joint density - https://brainly.com/question/30010853

#SPJ11

Answer:

80

Step-by-step explanation:

To solve this problem you multiply 16 by 100 and then divide the total by 20 as follows:

(16 x 100) / 20

=80

Answer:

80

Step-by-step explanation:

Let's assume x as any no.  multiply 20/100 equals 16  and then solve the equation in which you will get 80 as x.

To find the conditional pdf f2(y|x) of, we need to use the definition of conditional probability:

f2(y|x) = f(x,y) / f1(x)

where f(x,y) is the joint pdf of x and y, and f1(x) is the marginal pdf of x.

We can find the marginal pdf of x by integrating the joint pdf over y:

f1(x) = ∫f(x,y)dy = ∫6y dy = 3y^2 evaluated from y=0 to y=x

f1(x) = 3x^2, 0 < x < 1

Now we can use this result to find the conditional pdf:

f2(y|x) = f(x,y) / f1(x) = 6y / 3x^2 = 2y / x^2, 0 < y < x < 1

Therefore, the conditional pdf f2(y|x) is given by 2y / x^2, 0 < y < x < 1.

This means that the probability density function of the random variable γ, given that x has a specific value, is proportional to 2y, with a proportionality constant of 1/x^2. This makes sense, as the conditional pdf f2(y|x) indicates that the value of γ tends to increase as the value of x increases.

In summary, we have found that the conditional pdf f2(y|x) for the given joint pdf (x,y) = 6y,0 < y < x < 1 is 2y / x^2, 0 < y < x < 1.

More related to pdf: https://brainly.com/question/30696248

#SPJ11

The difference in the measures of center is about 0.921 times the measure of variation..

For data set A:

mean = (130 + 235 + 340 + 345 + 250 + 155)/(1+2+3+3+2+1)

= 215/12

≈ 17.92

For data set B:

mean = (310 + 115 + 420 + 125 + 3 x 30)/(3+1+4+1+3)

= 110/12

≈ 9.17

So, The difference in the means is:

= 17.92 - 9.17

≈ 8.75

To find the measure of variation, we can use the Mean Absolute Deviation (MAD), which is the average distance between each data point and the mean:

For data set A:

MAD = [(30-17.92) + (35-17.92) + (35-17.92) + (40-17.92) + (40-17.92) + (40-17.92) + (45-17.92) + (45-17.92) + (45-17.92) + (50-17.92) + (50-17.92) + (55-17.92)]/12

= 212/12

≈ 17.67

For data set B:

MAD = [(10-9.17) + (10-9.17) + (10-9.17) + (15-9.17) + (20-9.17) + (20-9.17) + (20-9.17) + (20-9.17) + (25-9.17) + (30-9.17) + (30-9.17) + (30-9.17)]/12

= 114/12

≈ 9.50

Thus, The multiple of the measure of variation is:

= 8.75/9.50 ≈ 0.921

Learn more about MAD here:

https://brainly.com/question/10528201

#SPJ1

Molly hikes 1/4 mile every day.

To hike a total of 2 miles, she would have to hike for 8 days. To hike a total of 1/2 a mile, she would have to hike for 2 days.

We are given that Molly hikes "mile" every day, which we can assume is a typographical error and is meant to be "1 mile." From the given information, we can calculate that Molly hikes 1/4 mile every day (since she hikes 1 mile in 4 days).

To hike a total of 2 miles, Molly would need to hike for 8 days, since:

2 miles / (1/4 mile per day) = 8 days

Similarly, to hike a total of 1/2 a mile, Molly would need to hike for 2 days, since:

1/2 mile / (1/4 mile per day) = 2 days

Therefore, we can conclude that Molly hikes 1/4 mile every day, and she would need to hike for 8 days to hike a total of 2 miles, and for 2 days to hike a total of 1/2 a mile.

Learn more about every day here

https://brainly.com/question/10971716

#SPJ11

Nausea appears to be a problematic adverse reaction to Eliquis, since a significantly larger proportion of users experience this side effect than the claimed rate of 3%.

We can use a hypothesis test to determine whether nausea is a problematic adverse reaction to Eliquis. Let p be the true proportion of all Eliquis users who develop nausea.

The null hypothesis is that the proportion of Eliquis users who develop nausea is equal to 0.03:

H0: p = 0.03

The alternative hypothesis is that the proportion of Eliquis users who develop nausea is greater than 0.03:

Ha: p > 0.03

We can use a one-tailed z-test to test this hypothesis, since we are testing whether the proportion of Eliquis users who develop nausea is greater than 0.03. Using the given data, we calculate the test statistic as:

z = (0.0258 - 0.03) / sqrt((0.03 * 0.97) / 5924) ≈ -1.86

where 0.0258 is the sample proportion of Eliquis users who developed nausea (153/5924), and 0.97 is 1 minus the assumed value of p.

Using a z-table, we can find the p-value associated with this test statistic. The p-value is the probability of observing a test statistic as extreme as -1.86 or more extreme, assuming the null hypothesis is true. The p-value is approximately 0.031.

Since the p-value is less than the significance level of 0.05, we reject the null hypothesis. We have sufficient evidence to conclude that the proportion of Eliquis users who develop nausea is greater than 0.03.

Therefore, nausea appears to be a problematic adverse reaction to Eliquis, since a significantly larger proportion of users experience this side effect than the claimed rate of 3%.

Learn more about proportion here

https://brainly.com/question/870035

#SPJ11

A, the measures of variation would all be 0. This is because variation measures the differences or spread of values within a dataset. If there is no mercury present in the tuna sushi, then all the values would be the same, resulting in no variation and all measures of variation would be 0.

that since there is no difference or spread in the data, it is not possible to calculate the range, variance, or standard deviation, which are the measures of variation. Therefore, the correct answer is option A.

In conclusion, if the tuna sushi contained no mercury, the measures of variation would all be 0, as there would be no variation in the data.

The measures of variation describe the dispersion or spread of a dataset. If the tuna sushi contained no mercury, that means there is no variation in mercury content. In this case, all data points would be the same (0 mercury), resulting in no dispersion or spread.

If tuna sushi had no mercury content, the measures of variation would be 0, indicating no dispersion in the data.

To know more about measures, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/4725561

#SPJ11

The value of x should be less than 3.5.

Given that sides of a triangle are x cm, x + 3 cm and 10 cm. We need to find the lowest value of x,

Using the triangle inequality theorem,

The triangle inequality theorem states that, in a triangle, the sum of lengths of any two sides is greater than the length of the third side.

So,

x + x + 3 > 10

2x + 3 > 10

2x < 7

x < 3.5

Hence the value of x should be less than 3.5.

Learn more about triangle inequality theorem click;

https://brainly.com/question/30956177

#SPJ1

To find the fractional probability of "c" being the first or last letter, we need to count the number of favorable outcomes  and divide it by the total number of possible outcomes.

Let's break it down step by step:

Step 1 : Counting the total number of possible outcomes:

Since we have 4 distinct letters in the word "cars," there are 4 possible choices for the first position, 3 remaining choices for the second position, 2 for the third position, and only 1 for the last position. Thus, the total number of possible outcomes is:

Total Possible Outcomes = 4 * 3 * 2 * 1 = 24

Step 2 : Counting the number of favorable outcomes:

To find the number of favorable outcomes, we need to count the arrangements where "c" is in the first or last position.

Case 1 : "c" in the first position

In this case, we fix "c" in the first position, and the remaining letters "a", "r", and "s" can be arranged in any order in the remaining three positions. Therefore, the number of favorable outcomes for this case is:

Number of Favorable Outcomes (Case 1) = 1 * 3 * 2 * 1 = 6

Case 2 : "c" in the last position

Similar to Case 1, we fix "c" in the last position, and the remaining letters can be arranged in any order in the first three positions. So, the number of favorable outcomes for this case is:

Number of Favorable Outcomes (Case 2) = 3 * 2 * 1 * 1 = 6

Step 3 : Calculate the fractional probability:

To find the fractional probability, we divide the number of favorable outcomes by the total possible outcomes:

Fractional Probability = (Number of Favorable Outcomes) / (Total Possible Outcomes)

= (6 + 6) / 24

= 12 / 24

= 1/2

= 0.5

Therefore, the fractional probability of "c" being the first or last letter is 0.5 or 50%.

Learn more about fractional probability here : brainly.com/question/12732115

#SPJ11

Answer:

To find -2B - A, we need to first find the product of 2 and matrix B, and then subtract matrix A from the result.

We can start by finding the product of 2 and matrix B:

2B = 2 *

[

1

4

​

−6

10

​

−7

−2

​

] =

[

2

8

​

−12

20

​

−14

−4

​

]

Next, we can subtract matrix A from 2B:

-2B - A =

[

2

8

​

−12

20

​

−14

−4

​

] -

[

4

2

​

5

6

​

4

4

​

] =

[

-2

6

​

-17

14

​

-18

-8

​

]

Therefore,

−2

�

−

�

.

−2B−A

�

=

[

-2

6

​

-17

14

​

-18

-8

​

].

Step-by-step explanation:

All of the methods mentioned, i.e., bar chart, pie chart, and relative frequency table are valid ways to summarize or visualize categorical variables. Option D.

Here, we have,

They are commonly used in data analysis to gain insights into the distribution and proportion of different categories within a dataset.

A bar chart is a graphical representation of data that uses rectangular bars to display the frequency or proportion of different categories. It is useful in comparing the frequencies of different categories and identifying the most common or rare categories.

A pie chart is another graphical representation of data that uses slices of a circle to display the relative frequency or proportion of different categories. It is useful in showing the proportion of each category in relation to the whole.

A relative frequency table is a tabular representation of data that displays the frequency and proportion of each category. It is useful in comparing the frequencies and proportions of different categories and identifying the most common or rare categories.

Therefore, none of the options given would be an invalid way to summarize or visualize categorical variables. The choice of which method to use depends on the nature of the data and the purpose of the analysis.

It is important to choose a method that effectively communicates the information being presented and is appropriate for the audience. So Option D is correct.

For more question on frequency visit:

brainly.com/question/28821602

#SPJ12

To calculate the expected annual maintenance expense, we need to know the hourly maintenance cost of the new machine. Let's say it is $50 per hour. Then the expected annual maintenance expense would be:

30 hours/week x 52 weeks/year x $50/hour = $78,000

To develop a 95% prediction interval for the company's annual maintenance expense, we need to know the variability of the maintenance cost. Let's say the standard deviation of the maintenance cost is $10,000. Then the 95% prediction interval would be:

($78,000 - 1.96 x $10,000, $78,000 + 1.96 x $10,000) = ($58,240, $97,760)

If the maintenance contract costs $3000 per year, I would recommend purchasing the contract for the new machine. The expected maintenance expense is greater than $3000, so having the contract would provide some cost savings and peace of mind. Select "Yes."
To calculate the expected annual maintenance expense in hundreds of dollars, we need some more information, such as the cost per hour or any other relevant details about the machine's maintenance costs. Please provide these details so I can assist you with the calculation.

Once we have the expected annual maintenance expense, we can develop a 95% prediction interval using the given data (mean, standard deviation, etc.), which we also need from you.

After obtaining the prediction interval, we can compare the expected maintenance expense to the $3000 maintenance contract cost. If the expected expense is greater than $3000, it would be recommended to purchase the contract; if it is less than $3000, then the contract would not be recommended.

To know more about interval visit:

https://brainly.com/question/479532

#SPJ11

Therefore, the correct gradient vector field plot for f(x, y) = 9x^2 + 9y^2 is Plot B.

To match the function f(x, y) = 9x^2 + 9y^2 with the correct gradient vectorfield plot, we need to determine the gradient vector field of the function first.

The gradient of a function is a vector that points in the direction of the maximum increase of the function and whose magnitude is the rate of change in that direction. In other words, the gradient vector points in the direction of steepest ascent.
To find the gradient of f(x, y) = 9x^2 + 9y^2, we need to take the partial derivatives of the function with respect to x and y:
∂f/∂x = 18x
∂f/∂y = 18y
So, the gradient vector of f(x, y) is given by:
grad(f) = (18x, 18y)
Now, we need to plot the gradient vector field of f(x, y) using this vector. The gradient vector field represents the direction and magnitude of the gradient at every point in the x-y plane.
In this case, since the magnitude of the gradient vector is a constant value of 18, we can use the same length for all the arrows.

Now, let's consider the following plots of gradient vector fields:

Plot A:

- The arrows are pointing outward from the origin.
- The arrows are evenly spaced and have the same length.
- The magnitude of the gradient is constant everywhere.

Plot B:

- The arrows are pointing outward from the origin.
- The arrows are closer together near the origin and become farther apart as we move away from the origin.
- The magnitude of the gradient is increasing as we move away from the origin.

Plot C:

- The arrows are pointing in different directions.
- The arrows are closer together near the origin and become farther apart as we move away from the origin.
- The magnitude of the gradient is increasing as we move away from the origin.

Now, let's analyze each plot in relation to the function f(x, y) = 9x^2 + 9y^2:

- Plot A cannot be the correct gradient vector field for f(x, y) because the magnitude of the gradient is constant everywhere, while the function f(x, y) is increasing as we move away from the origin.
- Plot B could be the correct gradient vector field for f(x, y) because the magnitude of the gradient is increasing as we move away from the origin, which matches the behavior of the function f(x, y).
- Plot C cannot be the correct gradient vector field for f(x, y) because the arrows are pointing in different directions, which means that the gradient is not pointing in the direction of steepest ascent.
Therefore, the correct gradient vector field plot for f(x, y) = 9x^2 + 9y^2 is Plot B.

To know more about gradient vector visit:-

https://brainly.com/question/29699363

#SPJ11

The probability that a randomly selected point within the circle falls in the red-shaded triangle is 0.31847.

We have to find the Area of Triangle and whole circle.

So, area of Triangle

= 1/2 x b x h

= 1/2 x 12 x 24

= 144 square unit

and, area of Circle

= πr²

= 3.14 (12)²

= 452.16 square unit

Now, the probability that a randomly selected point within the circle falls in the red-shaded triangle

= 144 / 452.16

= 14400 / 45216

= 0.31847

Learn more about Probability here:

https://brainly.com/question/30034780

#SPJ1

The slope is 1.5 and it means that the foot length increases by an average rate of 1.5.

The y-intercept is 4.3 and it represents the initial foot length.

In Mathematics and Geometry, the slope-intercept form of the equation of a straight line is given by this mathematical equation;

y = mx + c

Where:

Based on the information provided above, a linear equation for the line of best fit is given by;

y = mx + c

f = 1.5h - 4.3

By comparison, we have the following:

Slope, m = 1.5

y-intercept, c = 4.3

Read more on slope-intercept here: brainly.com/question/7889446

#SPJ1

Complete Question:

The equation of the line of best fit is F=1.5h -4.3, where F is foot length in millimeters and h is height in centimeters. Explain the meaning of the slope and the Y-intercept of this equation in the context of the data

Answer:

5(2x - 4) - 2y

if x= -2

5( (2×-2) -4)-2y

5(-4 -4) -2y

if y=6

5(-8) -2(6)

5(-8) -12

-40 - 12

= -52

The area of the shaded region on the circle opposite to point C is approximately 9.76 square centimeters.

The area of the sector can be calculated using the formula:

Area of sector = (θ/360) x πr²

where r is the radius of the circle. In this case, r = 6 cm. To find θ, we can use trigonometry. We know that AC and BC are radii of the circle, so they are both equal to 6 cm. We also know that AB = 8 cm. Using the cosine rule, we can find the angle θ:

cos(θ) = (6² + 6² - 8²)/(2 x 6 x 6)

cos(θ) = 0.5 θ = cos⁻¹(0.5) θ = 60 degrees

Now we can substitute the values of θ and r into the formula for the area of the sector:

Area of sector = (60/360) x π x 6²

Area of sector = 18π cm²

Next, we need to find the area of the triangle ABC. We can use the formula for the area of a triangle:

Area of triangle = 0.5 x base x height

In this case, the base is AB = 8 cm, and the height is given by the perpendicular distance from point C to AB. We can find this distance using the sine rule:

sin(θ) = height/AC

sin(60) = height/6

height = 3√3 cm

Now we can substitute the values of the base and height into the formula for the area of the triangle:

Area of triangle = 0.5 x 8 x 3√3

Area of triangle = 12√3 cm²

Finally, we can find the area of the shaded region by subtracting the area of the triangle from the area of the sector:

Area of shaded region = Area of sector - Area of triangle

Area of shaded region = 18π - 12√3 Area of shaded region ≈ 9.76 cm²

To know more about area here

https://brainly.com/question/14994710

#SPJ1

The smaller minimum value is -9 in function q(x). Therefore, option C is the correct answer.

The given function is q(x)=x²+2x-8.

Substitute, x=-4, -3, -2, -2, 0, 1 in the given function we get

When x=-4

q(-4)=(-4)²+2(-4)-8

= 0

When x=-3

q(-3)=(-3)²+2(-3)-8

= 9-6-8

= -5

When x=-2

q(-2)=(-2)²+2(-2)-8

= 4-4-8

= -8

When x=-1

q(-1)=(-1)²+2(-1)-8

= 1-2-8

= -9

When x=0

q(0)=-8

When x=1

q(1)=(1)²+2(1)-8

= -5

Therefore, option A is the correct answer.

To learn more about the function visit:

https://brainly.com/question/28303908.

#SPJ1

The probability that the person picks a 4 as the first number (event H) and the second number exceeds 5 (event K) is 1/30.

We can determine the probabilities of events H and K as follows:

P(H) = probability of picking a 4 as the first number = 1/6 (since there are 6 equally likely numbers to choose from and only 1 of them is a 4)

P(K) = probability of picking a number greater than 5 as the second number = 1/5 (since there are 5 remaining numbers to choose from and only 1 of them is greater than 5)

Now, we need to find the probability of both events H and K occurring, which is denoted as P(H ∩ K).

Since the person must randomly pick two numbers and the second number must be different from the first, the total number of equally likely outcomes is 6 * 5 = 30 (6 choices for the first number and 5 choices for the second number).

Out of these 30 equally likely outcomes, there is only 1 outcome where the first number is 4 and the second number exceeds 5, which is (4, 6). Therefore, P(H ∩ K) = 1/30.

Know more about probability here:

https://brainly.com/question/30034780

#SPJ11

The measurements that cannot represent the side lengths of a right triangle are 4 cm, 6 cm, 10 cm. That is option A.

The easiest way to know if these measurements could not represent the side lengths of a right triangle is to apply Pythagorean theorem which states that "the sum of the squares of the two shorter sides (the legs) is equal to the square of the longest side (the hypotenuse)."

Measurement A: 4 cm, 6 cm, 10 cm

Using the Pythagorean theorem, we have:

4²+ 6² = 16 + 36 = 52

10² = 100

52 ≠ 100 (cannot represent the side lengths of a right triangle)

Measurement B: 10 cm, 24 cm, 26 cm

Using the Pythagorean theorem, we have:

10² + 24² = 100 + 576 = 676

26² = 676 (can represent the side lengths of a right triangle)

Measurement C: 2 cm, 35 cm, 37 cm

Using the Pythagorean theorem, we have:

12² + 35² = 144 + 1225 = 1369

37² = 1369 (can represent the side lengths of a right triangle)

Measurement D: 6 cm, 8 cm, 10 cm

Using the Pythagorean theorem, we have:

6² + 8² = 36 + 64 = 100

10² = 100 (can represent the side lengths of a right triangle)

Learn more about right angle triangle here:

https://brainly.com/question/1248322

#SPJ1

Answer:

C = 16πcm

A = 64π cm^2

Step-by-step explanation:

So our given r is 8cm and we calculate circumfrunce as

[tex]c = 2\pi \: r = \pi \: d[/tex]

And for area as

[tex]a = \pi \: {r}^{2} = \pi \: { \frac{d}{4} }^{2} [/tex]

so

C= 2πr

C = 2 ( 8cm ) π

C = 16πcm

And

A = πr^2

A = π(8cm)^2

A = 64π cm^2

The one-sided p-value for this test can be found using a t-distribution table with degrees of freedom (df) equal to n-1 (where n is the sample size, which in this case is 10). Looking up a t-statistic of 1.30 with df=9 yields a p-value of approximately 0.11.

Since the alternative hypothesis is one-sided (H1: > 24), we need to divide the p-value by 2 to get the one-sided p-value.

Therefore, the one-sided p-value for this test is 0.11/2 = 0.055 or approximately 0.06.

The closest answer choice to this is (b) 0.05 < p < 0.10.
Hi! To find the one-sided p-value for a one-sample t-test with a t-statistic of 1.30 for the given hypothesis H0: μ = 24 vs. H1: μ > 24, follow these steps:

1. Determine the degrees of freedom for the t-distribution: In this case, there are 10 adults in the study, so the degrees of freedom (df) are 10 - 1 = 9.

2. Look up the t-statistic (1.30) in a t-distribution table or use a calculator or software to find the corresponding p-value.

3. Since this is a one-sided test, the p-value you find will be the correct value.

After performing these steps, you will find that the one-sided p-value for this test falls within the range of 0.10 < p < 0.15, so the correct answer is option c.

To know more about p-value visit:

https://brainly.com/question/13786078

#SPJ11

An equation of the form y = mx + b represents a linear relationship between two variables, where y is the dependent variable, x is the independent variable, m is the slope, and b is the y-intercept.

To determine whether the equation shows a proportional relationship or some other relationship, you need to analyze the value of the slope, m. If m is a constant value, then the equation represents a proportional relationship between x and y. In a proportional relationship, as the value of x increases or decreases, the value of y changes proportionally, such that the ratio of y to x remains constant.

On the other hand, if m is not a constant value, then the equation represents a non-proportional relationship between x and y. In a non-proportional relationship, the ratio of y to x changes as x changes. This means that the relationship between x and y is more complex and cannot be described by a simple proportionality constant.

Learn more about Proportionality here:

https://brainly.com/question/29126727

#SPJ1

The remaining two sums do not satisfy the inequality, and therefore do not prove that the boards will form a triangle.

I apologize for the inconvenience you faced earlier. For the current question, the following sums prove that the boards will create a triangular outline for the garden:

5 + 2.5 > 4

4 + 2.5 > 5

4 + 5 > 2.5

To form a triangle, the sum of the lengths of any two sides must be greater than the length of the third side. Applying this rule to the given lengths, we can see that the first and third sums satisfy the inequality, while the second sum also satisfies it. Therefore, all of the first, second and third sums prove that the boards will create a triangular outline for the garden. The remaining two sums do not satisfy the inequality, and therefore do not prove that the boards will form a triangle.

Learn more about inequality here

https://brainly.com/question/25275758

#SPJ11