Solve the equation dX(t) = rX(t)(1 - X(t)dt + oX(t)dW, XO) = Xo, where r and o are constants. Find X(t), E(X(t)) and V(X(t)).

Angle A is measured as 39°.

Inverse trigonometric functions have been what they sound like.

The opposite direction functions of trigonometry are somewhat the inverse functions of the basic trigonometric functions. The basic trigonometric function sin = x can be replaced with sin-1 x =. In this case, x is able to be expressed as a whole number, a decimal number, a fraction, as well as an exponent.

Now, we have AB (Hypotenuse)= 54 m BC (opposite side)= 38 m in triangle ABC.

To find the angle A's measurement

By employing inverse trigonometric keys.

We are aware of the following:

The sin inverse formula is as follows:

[tex]\theta = Sin^-^1(\frac{opposite side}{hypontenuse} )[/tex]

[tex]\theta= Sin^-^1(\frac{54}{38} )[/tex]

[tex]\theta= Sin^-^1(\frac{27}{19} )[/tex]  ≈1.570796326794897−0.888179846706129

θ = 39°

Learn more about Trigonometric function at:

https://brainly.com/question/6904750

#SPJ1

The general solution of the given differential equation is:
r cos(y) = -(x+1)^2 + Ax + B, where A and B are constants.

To find the general solution of the given differential equation, we can use the method of separation of variables.
First, we can separate the variables by dividing both sides by (x+1)^2 and multiplying by dx:

r sin(y) dy/(x+1)^2 = dx

Next, we can integrate both sides:

∫ r sin(y) dy/(x+1)^2 = ∫ dx

Using the substitution u = x+1 and du = dx, we get:

∫ r sin(y) dy/u^2 = ∫ du

Integrating both sides again, we get:

- r cos(y)/u + C = u + D

where C and D are constants of integration.

Substituting back u = x+1, we get:

- r cos(y)/(x+1) + C = x+1 + D

Rearranging, we get:

r cos(y) = -(x+1)^2 + Ax + B

where A = C+1 and B = D-C-1 are constants.

Thus, the general solution of the given differential equation is:

r cos(y) = -(x+1)^2 + Ax + B, where A and B are constants.

To learn more about differential equations visit : https://brainly.com/question/1164377

#SPJ11

There are 72 ways a customer can select a meal consisting of one choice from each category

This is an example of the multiplication principle of counting. The multiplication principle states that if there are m ways to do one thing, and n ways to do another thing after the first thing is done, then there are m x n ways to do both things together.

In this problem, there are 4 main courses to choose from, 3 desserts to choose from, and 6 drinks to choose from. Using the multiplication principle, we can find the total number of ways to select a meal by multiplying the number of choices for each category:

Total number of ways = 4 x 3 x 6 = 72

Therefore, there are 72 ways to select a meal consisting of one choice from each category.

Learn more about multiplication at https://brainly.com/question/23036007

#SPJ11

The area of the composite figure is 29 feet squared.

A five-sided figure with a flat top labelled 5 and one-half feet.  A height labelled 4 feet. The length of the entire image is 9 ft.

Therefore, the area of the composite figure can  be found as follows;

The figure can be divide into two shapes which are rectangle and a triangle.

Hence,

area of the composite figure = area of the rectangle + area of the triangle

area of the rectangle = 4 × 5.5 = 22 ft²

area of the triangle = 1 / 2 bh

where

area of the triangle = 1 / 2 × 4 × (9 - 5.5)

area of the triangle = 1 / 2 × 4 × 3.5

area of the triangle = 14 / 2

area of the triangle = 7 ft²

Therefore,

area of the composite figure = 22 + 7

area of the composite figure = 29 ft²

learn more on area here: https://brainly.com/question/31272718

#SPJ1

Based on the information, csc(0) - sin(0) = cot(0) cos(0) is a valid identity.

lim x→0+ csc(x) = ∞

lim x→0- csc(x) = -∞

Recall that cot(0) is undefined, as the cotangent function has a vertical asymptote at x=0. However, we can still simplify the expression by using the limit definition of the cotangent function as x approaches 0:

lim x→0+ cot(x) = ∞

lim x→0- cot(x) = -∞

Since both sides simplify to ∞, we can say that the identity holds.

Therefore, csc(0) - sin(0) = cot(0) cos(0) is a valid identity.

Learn more about identity on

https://brainly.com/question/343682

#SPJ1

The credit-card purchase price of the item after a 4% discount is $87.50.

To find the credit-card purchase price of the item, we need to first calculate the amount of discount offered for paying in cash. This can be done by multiplying the cash price by the discount rate:

$84 x 0.04 = $3.36

This means that the discount offered for paying in cash is $3.36. To find the credit-card purchase price, we need to add this discount amount back to the cash price:

$84 + $3.36 = $87.36

Therefore, the credit-card purchase price of the item is $87.36. However, this is not the final answer because we need to round it to the nearest cent. The nearest cent is $87.50 since $87.36 is closer to $87.50 than it is to $87.49.

Therefore, the credit-card purchase price of the item is $87.50.

Learn more about discount

https://brainly.com/question/23865811

#SPJ4

Answer:

C

Step-by-step explanation:

The reason I would choose C is that the penny doubling each day might seem small but the amount would continue to grow exponentially giving you a might higher payoff than the rest of the options. I don't know the exact amount you would get by it is around 3 mill.

Option B gives you linear growth, which means that by the end of 30 days, you would only have 750,000.

Option A is the worst potion only leaving you with 1 million.

Wingate Metal Products, Inc.'s capital structure weights are 60% for debt financing and 40% for equity financing

To find Wingate Metal Products, Inc.'s capital structure weights for debt and equity financing, you need to first identify the weighted average cost of capital (WACC), after-tax cost of debt financing, and cost of equity financing.

The information provided is as follows:
- WACC: 9.0%
- After-tax cost of debt financing: 7%
- Cost of equity financing: 12%

Let's use the formula for WACC:

WACC = (Weight of Debt * Cost of Debt) + (Weight of Equity * Cost of Equity)

Since the weights of debt and equity financing must sum up to 1, we can represent the weight of debt as "x" and the weight of equity as "1-x". Now, we can rewrite the formula:

9.0% = (x * 7%) + ((1-x) * 12%)

Now, solve for x (weight of debt financing) and 1-x (weight of equity financing):

9.0% = 7x + 12 - 12x
9.0% = 12 - 5x
5x = 3%
x = 0.6

The weight of debt financing is 0.6, and the weight of equity financing is 1-0.6 = 0.4.

Therefore, Wingate Metal Products, Inc.'s capital structure weights are 60% for debt financing and 40% for equity financing.

Capitalhttps://brainly.com/question/30590270

#SPJ11

Answer: 384

Step-by-step explanation:

you would find the volume and then divide by 2

To prove that 1/xy = 1/x * 1/y, we can start by multiplying both sides of the equation by xy.

Multiplying both sides of the equation by xy gives us:

1 = xy * 1/x * 1/y

Next, we can simplify the right-hand side by canceling out the x and y terms that appear in both the numerator and denominator:

1 = y/x + x/y

To further simplify this expression, we can multiply both sides by xy:

xy = y^2 + x^2

This equation can be rearranged to get:

x^2 + y^2 = xy

Finally, we can use the formula for the sum of squares:

x^2 + y^2 = (x+y)^2 - 2xy

Substituting this into the previous equation, we get:

(x+y)^2 - 2xy = xy

Simplifying, we get:

(x+y)^2 = 3xy

Taking the square root of both sides, we get:

x+y = sqrt(3xy)

Dividing both sides by xy, we get:

1/xy = 1/x * 1/y

Therefore, we have proven that 1/xy = 1/x * 1/y.

To learn more about equations visit : https://brainly.com/question/2972832

#SPJ11

There were 5500 shipments of one book, 2500 shipments of two books, and 1500 shipments of three to five books.

Let's denote the number of shipments for one book, two books, and three to five books as x, y, and z respectively. Then we can set up a system of equations based on the given information:

x + 2y + 3z = total number of books shipped

4x + 6y + 7z = total shipping charges

We know that there were 6400 orders of five or fewer books, so we can set an upper bound on the total number of books shipped:

x + y + z <= 6400

We also know that the number of shipments with $7 charges was 1000 less than the number with $6 charges, so:

z = y - 1000

Now we can substitute the last equation into the first two equations to eliminate z:

x + 2y + 3(y - 1000) = total number of books shipped

4x + 6y + 7(y - 1000) = total shipping charges

Simplifying and rearranging:

x - y = 3000

3x - y = 16000

Solving this system of equations gives:

x = 5500

y = 2500

z = 1500

There were 1500 shipments of three to five books, 2500 of two books, and 5,500 of one book.

Learn more about book at https://brainly.com/question/29326413

#SPJ11

The equation of the line through the point (2,1) with a slope of 3, expressed in slope-intercept form, is y = 3x - 5.

To determine the equation of the line through the point (2,1) with a slope of 3 and express it in slope-intercept form.

Step 1: Recall the slope-intercept form of a linear equation, which is y = mx + b, where m is the slope and b is the y-intercept.

Step 2: Substitute the given slope (m = 3) and the coordinates of the given point (x = 2, y = 1) into the equation: 1 = 3(2) + b.

Step 3: Solve for b. First, multiply 3 by 2 to get 6: 1 = 6 + b. Then, subtract 6 from both sides to find the value of b: b = -5.

Step 4: Write the final equation of the line by substituting the values of m and b back into the slope-intercept form: y = 3x - 5.

Learn more about slope-intercept form: https://brainly.com/question/22057368

#SPJ11

S U T is a basis of Rn, and we have

dim(S U T) = dim(S) + dim(T) = s + (n - s) = n

which confirms that S and T are complementary subspaces of Rn.

(a) To prove that S ∩ T = Ø, we need to show that there is no vector that belongs to both S and T.

Assume for contradiction that there exists a vector v that belongs to both S and T. Then, since v is in T, it is orthogonal to all vectors in S, including itself. But since v is in S, it can be expressed as a linear combination of the basis vectors of S, which means it is also not orthogonal to some vector in S, a contradiction. Therefore, S ∩ T = Ø.

(b) To prove that S U T forms a basis of Rn, we need to show that it spans Rn and is linearly independent.

(i) Spanning property: Let x be any vector in Rn. Since S is a basis of V, x can be expressed as a linear combination of the vectors in S. Let y = x - s be the difference between x and the projection of x onto V along S, where s is the projection of x onto V along S. Then y is orthogonal to V, and thus y is in T. Therefore, x = s + y, where s is in V and y is in T. Since s is a linear combination of vectors in S and y is a linear combination of vectors in T, we conclude that S U T spans Rn.

(ii) Linear independence: Assume that there exist scalars c1, c2, ..., cn and d1, d2, ..., dm such that

c1v1 + c2v2 + ... + cnvn + d1w1 + d2w2 + ... + dmwm = 0

where 0 is the zero vector in Rn. We want to show that all the ci's and di's are zero.

Since the vectors in S are linearly independent, we know that c1 = c2 = ... = cn = 0. Thus, the equation reduces to

d1w1 + d2w2 + ... + dmwm = 0

Since the vectors in T are also linearly independent, we know that d1 = d2 = ... = dm = 0. Therefore, S U T is linearly independent.

Since S U T spans Rn and is linearly independent, it forms a basis of Rn.

(c) We know that S is a basis of V, so dim(V) = |S| = s. Let S' be the orthogonal complement of S in Rn, i.e., S' = {x in Rn: x is orthogonal to all vectors in S}. Then, dim(S') = n - s.

We also know that T is a basis of V', the orthogonal complement of V in Rn. Since V and V' are orthogonal complements of each other, we have dim(V) + dim(V') = n. Therefore, we have

dim(T) = dim(V') = n - dim(V) = n - s

Adding the dimensions of S and T, we get

dim(S) + dim(T) = s + (n - s) = n

Therefore, S U T is a basis of Rn, and we have

dim(S U T) = dim(S) + dim(T) = s + (n - s) = n

which confirms that S and T are complementary subspaces of Rn.

To learn more about complementary visit:

https://brainly.com/question/5708372

#SPJ11

The scatter plot shows that there is no strong correlation between average weight and life expectancy for the 12 dog breeds. The coefficient of correlation for this adult weight data to be -0.123, which is very near to 0.

The adult weight of a person can vary greatly depending on several factors, including genetics, age, gender, height, muscle mass, and overall health. However, a healthy weight range for adults is typically determined by body mass index (BMI), which is calculated by dividing weight in kilograms by height in meters squared.

We can use the average weight as the x-value and the average life expectancy as the y-value to represent the data as ordered pairs. Following are the ordered pairs for the provided data:

(125, 57.5)

(62.5, 49)

(12, 16)

(12.3, 12)

(11, 11)

We may plot these ordered pairs on a scatter plot to show the form of the data. As for the story:

We can observe from the scatter plot that there is no obvious pattern formed by the data points. There is no discernible pattern or connection between the two variables, and the spots are dispersed throughout the plot. As a result, the data's shape can be described as random or dispersed.

We can calculate the correlation coefficient to provide more evidence for this. The variables do not have a linear relationship if the correlation coefficient is close to zero. we can calculate the coefficient of correlation for this data to be -0.123, which is very near to 0.

To learn more about adult weight visit:

https://brainly.com/question/395419

#SPJ4

The linear programming problem is solved using the simplex method by constructing the simplex tableau, performing pivot operations, and obtaining the optimal solution. The optimal values of the decision variables are X1 = 11, X2 = 3, and X3 = 0, and the optimal objective function value is Z = 29. The other variables X4, X5, and X6 are equal to 0.

What is a linear constraint?

Linear constraint refers to a set of mathematical equations or inequalities that restrict the feasible region of a linear programming problem to a polyhedron, which is a bounded convex region in the n-dimensional space defined by the values of the decision variables.

The objective is to optimize a linear objective function subject to these linear constraints, subject to non-negativity constraints on the decision variables.

a) Write out the full set of linear constraints including the surplus variables:
x1 + 4x2 + 2x3 + x4 = 28
3x1 + 6x2 + x3 + x5 = 36
2x1 + x2 + 5x3 + x6 = 20
x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6 ≥ 0
Note: Assume that the third constraint was actually meant to be "2x1 + x2 + 5x3 + x6 ≤ 20" since the original inequality was not specified.

b) Write the problem in standard form:
Minimize Z = 2x1 + 3x2 + 2x3 + 0x4 + 0x5 + 0x6
Subject to:
x1 + 4x2 + 2x3 + x4 = 28
3x1 + 6x2 + x3 + x5 = 36
2x1 + x2 + 5x3 + x6 ≤ 20
x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6 ≥ 0

c) Write the problem in matrix form:
Minimize Z = [2 3 2 0 0 0] [x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6]T
Subject to:
[1 4 2 1 0 0] [x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6]T = 28
[3 6 1 0 1 0] [x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6]T = 36
[2 1 5 0 0 1] [x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6]T ≤ 20
[x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6]T ≥ 0

d) Write out the initial simplex tableau:
Basic      x1      x2      x3      x4      x5      x6      RHS
Z          2       3       2       0       0       0       0
x4         1       4       2       1       0       0       28
x5         3       6       1       0       1       0       36
x6         2       1       5       0       0       1       20

Note: The initial tableau has the identity matrix as the coefficient matrix for the slack and surplus variables, and the objective coefficients are in the top row. The RHS column contains the right-hand side values of the constraints.

To know more about surplus variables visit:

https://brainly.com/question/31343353

#SPJ11

The maximum modulus is the maximum value of |z| within the given domain.

To find the maximum modulus, we need to find the point(s) within the unit circle where the modulus is the highest.

(a) ƒ(z) = z² - 2z + 3

We can write ƒ(z) as ƒ(z) = (z - 1)² + 2, which is a parabola that opens upwards. The maximum modulus occurs at the vertex, which is located at z = 1, and the maximum modulus is ƒ(1) = 2.

(b) ƒ(z) = z² + z - 1

We can write ƒ(z) as ƒ(z) = (z + 1/2)² - 5/4, which is a parabola that opens upwards. The maximum modulus occurs at the vertex, which is located at z = -1/2, and the maximum modulus is ƒ(-1/2) = 1/4.

(c) ƒ(z) = (z + 1)/(2z - 2)

We can write ƒ(z) as ƒ(z) = 1/2 + 3/(2z - 2), which is a hyperbola that opens downwards. The maximum modulus occurs at the point where the real part of z is 1/2, and the imaginary part of z is 0, which is located at z = 1. The maximum modulus is ƒ(1) = 2.

(d) ƒ(z) = cos(z)

The maximum modulus of cos(z) occurs at z = 0 or z = π, where the modulus is 1.

Therefore, the maximum modulus for each function is:

(a) 2

(b) 1/4

(c) 2

(d) 1

Note: The modulus of a complex number z is defined as |z| = sqrt(x^2 + y^2), where x and y are the real and imaginary parts of z, respectively. The maximum modulus is the maximum value of |z| within the given domain.

To learn more about complex visit:

https://brainly.com/question/31315365

#SPJ11

The simplified expression after simplification is 3x² - 3x - 2.

To simplify the expression, we need to distribute the negative sign to the second polynomial and then combine like terms.

So,

(2xx² - 4) - (-x²+ 3x - 6)

= 2x² - 4 +x²- 3x + 6 (distributing the negative sign)

= 3x²- 3x + 2 (combining like terms)

To simplify the given expression, we first need to distribute the negative sign to the terms inside the second parentheses:

(2x² - 4) - (-x² + 3x - 6)

= 2x² - 4 + ² - 3x + 6 (distributing the negative sign changes the signs of all terms inside the second parentheses)

= 3x² - 3x + 2

Therefore, the simplified expression is 3x² - 3x - 2.

Learn more about Simplification

https://brainly.com/question/28008382

#SPJ4

Complete Question:

Simplify (2x²−4)−(−x²+3x−6)(² −4)−(−x² +3x−6).

The probability that the sample mean would be less than 132.25 liters is 0.0564 (or 5.64% when expressed as a percentage), rounded to four decimal places.

We can use the central limit theorem to approximate the distribution of the sample mean as normal with a mean of 138 liters and a standard deviation of 28/sqrt(60) liters.

z = (132.25 - 138) / (28 / sqrt(60)) = -1.5811

Using a standard normal distribution table or a calculator, we can find the probability of getting a z-score less than -1.5811. The probability is approximately 0.0564.

Therefore, the probability that the sample mean would be less than 132.25 liters is 0.0564 (or 5.64% when expressed as a percentage), rounded to four decimal places.

To know more about  probability, here

https://brainly.com/question/13604758

#SPJ4

Based on the information, we can see from the line plots that Bus 14 tends to have longer travel times than Bus 18 for most of the data points, except for a few outliers.

In terms of travel time, Bus 14 and Bus 18 each have a median of 16 minutes. As such, it cannot be inferred from this information alone which mode of transportation tends to arrive more rapidly.

Nevertheless, the line plots reveal that Bus 14's journey takes slightly longer than Bus 18's for most of the data points, except for a few outliers.

Learn more about median on

https://brainly.com/question/26177250

#SPJ1

The radius and height of a real soda can with a double thickness in the top and bottom surfaces that minimize its surface area are approximately 2.89 cm and 13.15 cm, respectively. These dimensions are closer to the dimensions of a real soda can compared to the dimensions obtained in part (a).

a. To minimize the surface area of a cylindrical soda can, we need to find the values of radius and height that minimize the surface area equation.

Let's denote the radius of the can as r and the height as h. The volume of the can is given as 354 cm^3, so we have:

πr^2h = 354

Solving for h, we get:

h = 354 / (π[tex]r^2[/tex])

The surface area of the can can be calculated as follows:

A = 2πr^2 + 2πrh

Substituting the expression for h in terms of r, we get:

A = 2πr^2 + 2πr(354 / πr^2)

Simplifying:

A = 2πr^2 + 708 / r

To minimize the surface area, we need to find the value of r that makes the derivative of A with respect to r equal to zero:

dA/dr = 4πr - 708 / r^2

Setting dA/dr = 0, we get:

4πr = 708 / r^2

Multiplying both sides by r^2, we get:

4πr^3 = 708

Solving for r, we get:

r = (708 / 4π)^(1/3) ≈ 3.64 cm

Substituting this value of r back into the expression for h, we get:

h = 354 / (π(3.64)^2) ≈ 9.29 cm

Therefore, the radius and height of the cylindrical soda can with minimum surface area and volume of 354 cm^3 are approximately 3.64 cm and 9.29 cm, respectively.

b. Real soda cans do not seem to have an optimal design because their dimensions are not the same as the ones obtained in part (a). The radius of a real soda can is 3.1 cm and the height is 12.0 cm. However, real soda cans have a double thickness in their top and bottom surfaces, which means that their dimensions are not directly comparable to the dimensions of the cylindrical can we calculated in part (a).

To find the dimensions of a real soda can with a double thickness in the top and bottom surfaces that minimize its surface area, we can use the same approach as in part (a), but with the appropriate modification to the surface area equation:

A = 4πr^2 + 708 / r

Setting dA/dr = 0, we get:

8πr^3 = 708

Solving for r, we get:

r = (708 / 8π)^(1/3) ≈ 2.89 cm

Substituting this value of r back into the expression for h, we get:

h = 354 / (π(2.89)^2) ≈ 13.15 cm

Therefore, the radius and height of a real soda can with a double thickness in the top and bottom surfaces that minimize its surface area are approximately 2.89 cm and 13.15 cm, respectively. These dimensions are closer to the dimensions of a real soda can compared to the dimensions obtained in part (a).

To learn more about surface area  visit: https://brainly.com/question/29298005

#SPJ11

The partial sum for the power series which represents the function 1/(1-x³) consisting of the first 5 nonzero terms is: 1 + x³ + x⁶ + x⁹ + x¹² and the radius of convergence is 1.

The formula for the partial sum of a power series is given by:

Sₙ(x) = a₀ + a₁x + a₂x² + ... + aₙxⁿ

where a₀, a₁, a₂, ..., aₙ are the coefficients of the power series.

In this case, we can use the formula for the geometric series to find the coefficients:

1/(1-x³) = 1 + x³ + x⁶ + x⁹ + x¹² + ...

a₀ = 1

a₁ = 1

a₂ = 1

a₃ = 0

a₄ = 0

and so on.

Therefore, the first 5 nonzero terms of the power series are 1, x³, x⁶, x⁹, and x¹².

The radius of convergence for this power series can be found using the ratio test:

lim┬(n → ∞)⁡|aₙ₊₁/aₙ| = lim┬(n → ∞)⁡|x³/(1-x³)| = 1

Since the limit equals 1, the radius of convergence is 1.

To know more about  power series, refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/16407904#
#SPJ11

Using proportions, it is found that 8 more seventh graders are involved in the yearbook.

What is a proportion?

A proportion is a fraction of a total amount.

Researching the problem on the internet, it is found that 10% of the 6th graders and 18% of the 7th graders are on the yearbook, hence:

0.1 x 280 = 28 6th graders.

0.18 x 200 = 36 7th graders.

36 - 28 = 8

8 more seventh graders are involved in the yearbook.

The surface area of the entire prism is 294 ft².

The surface area of the entire prism can be found by summing the areas of the triangular and rectangular faces of the prism.

Since we have two triangular faces and  3 rectangular faces. Thus,

surface area of the entire prism = 2*( 1/2bh) + 3*(L*W)

where b = 6, h = 4, L = 18 and W = 5

surface area of the entire prism = 2*( 1/2 * 6*4) + 3*(18*5)

surface area of the entire prism = 24  + 270

surface area of the entire prism = 294 ft²

Learn more about surface area on:

https://brainly.com/question/76387

#SPJ1

The Approximate  height after 3 seconds using 6 rectangles is 255.45m

To inexact the stature of the shot after 3 seconds utilizing 6 rectangles, we are able to utilize the midpoint to run the show of guess. Here are the steps:

1. Partition the interim [0, 3] into 6 subintervals of rise to width, which is (3 - 0)/6 = 0.5. The 6 subintervals are:

[0, 0.5], [0.5, 1], [1, 1.5], [1.5, 2], [2, 2.5], [2.5, 3].

2. For each subinterval, discover the midpoint and assess the work v(t) at that midpoint. The stature of the shot at that time can be approximated as the item of the speed and the width of the subinterval.

3. Add up the zones of the 6 rectangles to urge the whole surmised stature(height).

Here are the calculations:

- For the subinterval [0, 0.5], the midpoint is (0 + 0.5)/2 = 0.25. The speed at t = 0.25 is v(0.25) = -15.4(0.25) + 147 = 143.65.

The inexact tallness amid this subinterval is 0.5(143.65) = 71.825.

- For the subinterval [0.5, 1], the midpoint is (0.5 + 1)/2 = 0.75. The speed at t = 0.75 is v(0.75) = -15.4(0.75) + 147 = 135.85.

The inexact stature amid this subinterval is 0.5(135.85) = 67.925.

- For the subinterval [1, 1.5], the midpoint is (1 + 1.5)/2 = 1.25. The speed at t = 1.25 is v(1.25) = -15.4(1.25) + 147 = 123.5.

The surmised stature amid this subinterval is 0.5(123.5) = 61.75.

- For the subinterval [1.5, 2], the midpoint is (1.5 + 2)/2 = 1.75. The speed at t = 1.75 is v(1.75) = -15.4(1.75) + 147 = 107.9.

The inexact tallness amid this subinterval is 0.5(107.9) = 53.95.

- For the subinterval [2, 2.5], the midpoint is (2 + 2.5)/2 = 2.25. The speed at t = 2.25 is v(2.25) = -15.4(2.25) + 147 = 88.15.

The surmised tallness amid this subinterval is 0.5(88.15) = 44.075.

- For the subinterval [2.5, 3], the midpoint is (2.5 + 3)/2 = 2.75. The speed at t = 2.75 is v(2.75) = -15.4(2.75) + 147 = 64.15.

The inexact tallness amid this subinterval is 0.5(64.15) = 32.075.

To induce the full inexact tallness, we include the zones of the 6 rectangles:

Add up to surmised height = 71.825 + 67.925 + 61.75 + 53.95 = 255.45

To know more about velocity refer to this :

https://brainly.com/question/24445340

#SPJ4

The sampling distribution of sample means, especially for samples with n>30, refers to the distribution of means obtained from repeated random sampling from the same population.

According to the Central Limit Theorem, this distribution will have the same mean as the population from which the samples are drawn, and it will be normally distributed regardless of the population's distribution shape. The statement is true. The sampling distribution of sample means is a distribution of the means of all possible samples of a certain size that can be drawn from a population. When the sample size is greater than 30, the Central Limit Theorem states that the sampling distribution will be approximately normal, regardless of the underlying population distribution.

Additionally, the mean of the sampling distribution of sample means will be equal to the population mean, assuming that the samples are drawn randomly and independently from the population. This makes it a useful tool for making inferences about the population mean based on a sample mean.

Learn more about Central Limit Theorem here: brainly.com/question/18403552

#SPJ11

We can find that this probability is 0.99994, rounded to five decimal places.

Based on the given statistic, we know that 80% of vehicles using the Lincoln Tunnel use E-ZPass. Therefore, we can expect that out of the 12 randomly selected vehicles, 80% or 0.8 * 12 = 9.6 vehicles would use E-ZPass. Rounding to the nearest whole number, we would expect 10 of the 12 vehicles to use E-ZPass.

The mode of the distribution is 10, as this is the most frequently occurring value in the sample.

Since 10 out of 12 vehicles is the mode, the probability associated with the mode is the proportion of vehicles that use E-ZPass in the sample. Therefore, the probability associated with the mode is 10/12 or 0.833, rounded to three decimal places.

The probability of four or more vehicles using E-ZPass can be calculated using the binomial distribution. The probability of a single vehicle using E-ZPass is 0.8, and the probability of a single vehicle not using E-ZPass is 0.2. The probability of four or more vehicles using E-ZPass is the sum of the probabilities of selecting 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, or 12 vehicles that use E-ZPass. Using Excel or a calculator, we can find that this probability is 0.99994, rounded to five decimal places.

Learn more about "probability": https://brainly.com/question/13604758

#SPJ11

The  limit of the function as x approaches infinity is infinity.

To evaluate this limit, we can use L'Hospital's rule, which says that if we have an indeterminate form of the type 0/0 or infinity/infinity, we can differentiate the numerator and denominator separately with respect to the variable of interest, and then take the limit again.

In this case, we have infinity/infinity, so we can apply L'Hospital's rule:

\begin{aligned}
\lim_{x\rightarrow\infty} \frac{8x}{2\ln(12e^x)} &= \lim_{x\rightarrow\infty} \frac{8}{\frac{2}{12e^x}}\\
&= \lim_{x\rightarrow\infty} \frac{8}{\frac{1}{6e^x}}\\
&= \lim_{x\rightarrow\infty} 48e^x\\
&= \infty
\end{aligned}

Therefore, the limit of the function as x approaches infinity is infinity.

Visit to know more about Limit:-

brainly.com/question/30339394

#SPJ11

The number of circles he will draw is 30 circles.

The branch of mathematics which involves the study and manipulation of mathematical symbols is known as Algebra. This field comprises the use of characters and signs to symbolize unknown values and their linkages.

How to solve:

On one card, we have 14 triangles and 6 circles

Therefore, if we have 70 triangles,

number of cards= 70/14

= 5 card

Thus, Total number of circles is 6 x 5 = 30 circles

Read more about algebra here:

https://brainly.com/question/22399890

#SPJ1