True. Federal courts and state courts cannot share concurrent jurisdiction. Even when a federal court has jurisdiction, state law matters may not be decided by federal trial courts inside a particular state.
The most suitable court site for a case is determined by the venue. Federal courts and state courts cannot share concurrent jurisdiction. When two or more courts from various legal systems simultaneously hold jurisdiction over a certain case, this is known as concurrent jurisdiction.
The parties will attempt to have their civil or criminal action heard in the court they believe will be most favorable to them, which frequently results in forum shopping. The ability of two or more courts from various jurisdictions to hear the cases mentioned below is referred to.
Learn more about jurisdiction Visit: brainly.com/question/10377896
#SPJ4
Name some areas where an officers personal traumas can be an asset to a department
Empathy and understanding are the areas that an officers trauma would be an asset to the department
Name some areas where an officers personal traumas can be an asset to a departmentAn officer's personal trauma can be an asset to a department in several ways:
Empathy and understanding: If an officer has experienced trauma themselves, they may be better able to understand and relate to victims of trauma in their work.
Communication skills: Personal trauma can also improve an officer's ability to communicate with people who have experienced similar traumatic events.
Problem-solving skills: Officers who have faced personal trauma may have developed creative and innovative coping mechanisms that they can apply in their work.
Resilience: Officers who have faced personal trauma and have overcome it may be better equipped to handle difficult situations in their work.
Cultural sensitivity: If an officer's personal trauma is related to a particular community, they may have a deeper understanding of that community's culture, history, and experiences, which can enhance their ability to work effectively with that group.
Read more on trauma here: https://brainly.com/question/13097273
#SPJ1
Protects against unreasonable searches and seizures is called as?
what is the controversial policy enforced by the EEOC that seeks to remedy past discrimination?
The policy regarding the inclusion of affirmative actions was a controversial policy enforced by the EEOC that sought to remedy past the practice of discrimination.
The policy of affirmative action had been brought into enforcement into the American society with an intention to provide remedial relief to the individuals who face discrimination in the society based on the different grounds. Ever since its enforcement by the EEOC, it became controversial, as many southern states had been in opposition of the same.
Learn more about affirmative action here:
https://brainly.com/question/8088645
#SPJ4
how do certifying officers ensure system integrity?
Certifying officers are required to carry out a number of actions to ensure system integrity. They must first determine which aspects of the system are crucial to its proper operation.
Second, they must create methods and tests to determine whether these vital features are present and operating as intended.
Thirdly, they need to keep an eye on the system throughout time to make sure it keeps working properly. Finally, if any issues are found, they must take corrective action. The VA will reverse its initial rejection of benefits and grant them to the veteran if the certifying officer can convincingly refute the presumption of carelessness.
To learn more about Certifying officers visit;
https://brainly.com/question/30245424
#SPJ4
part ii offenses do not include group of a) vagrancy. b) dui. c) gambling.
Part II offences do not include arson. (Option D).
The Uniform Crime Reporting (UCR) program has classified crimes according to their seriousness into two groups. Part I offences refer to group of serious crimes that happen on a regular basis and are likely to be reported to law enforcement. These offences include murder, assault, arson, larceny, robbery, identity theft, etc.
On the other hand, Part II offences are less serious crimes that are punishable by a fine of less than $5,000 or a prison term of less than six months. These include offences such as gambling, DUI, vagrancy, fraud, substance abuse, vandalism, disorderly conduct, embezzlement, etc. Hence, arson does not belong to the group of part II offences.
Note: The question is incomplete. The complete question probably is: Part II offences do not include a) vagrancy, b) DUI, c) gambling, d) arson.
Learn more about Part I offenses:
https://brainly.com/question/28488489
#SPJ11
In the United States, what recourse does an accused person have in case he or she cannot afford a private defense lawyer?a) The government will provide an attorney to the accused free of charge.b) The accused will have to spend his or her time in jail until he or she can obtain enough money to afford an attorney.c) He or she will have to defend himself or herself when the trial starts.d) A public defender will be appointed to the accused by the government for a nominal fee.
In the United States, an accused person who cannot afford a private defense lawyer the government will provide an attorney to the accused free of charge. (Option A)
In the US, if an accused person cannot afford a private defense lawyer, a public defender will be appointed to them by the government for free. This is outlined in the Sixth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, which guarantees the right to counsel for criminal defendants.
It is important to note that the right to counsel does not mean that an accused person is entitled to the lawyer of their choice, but rather that they are entitled to effective assistance of counsel. If an accused person is deemed indigent, or unable to afford a private defense lawyer, the government will appoint a public defender to represent them. Public defenders are attorneys who are employed by the government specifically to provide legal representation to those who cannot afford it.
In summary, an accused person in the United States who cannot afford a private defense lawyer will be provided with a public defender by the government at no cost to them.
Learn more about Right to counsel:
https://brainly.com/question/17649565
#SPJ11
what must a prosecutor prove when the law requires mens rea?
Each element of the offense must be shown beyond a reasonable doubt by the prosecutor. Anything that is assumed cannot be demonstrated, making it an appealable mistake.
The prosecution must establish both an actus reus—a physical act—and a mens rea—a state of mind—to commit the crime—for the defendant to be found guilty. Mens rea refers to the defendant's state of mind at the time the actus reus was committed. The mens rea requirements for certain crimes vary. The responsibility to back up your statements with adequate evidence is known as the burden of proof. For instance, if someone asserts that ghosts exist, they are required to present evidence to back up their claim.
To learn more about prosecutors visit;
https://brainly.com/question/12057544
#SPJ4
Krugman advocates that it is logical to expect the US government to ignore special-interest politics when forming policy.
True or false?
False. According to Krugman, it is realistic to expect that the US government will ignore special-interest politics when making judgments.
According to Paul Krugman, a strategic trade policy that seeks to give domestic businesses an advantage in a global industry is a beggar-thy-neighbors tactic that increases national income at the expense of other countries. Such measures are likely to be opposed by other nations that try to enact them.
The argument for trade policy argues that it is appropriate for the government to offer subsidies to start-up companies. In light of this, the strategic trade policy argument suggests that a government should use subsidies to support promising companies that operate in recently emerging industries.
Learn more about government policy Visit: brainly.com/question/3810659
#SPJ4
Laws are made to protect the public as a whole from the harmful acts of others
a)criminal
b)civil
c)international
d)military
Criminal laws are made to protect the public as a whole from the harmful acts of others.
What are Criminal laws?
Criminal law is the body of legislation that establishes criminal offenses, governs the detention, accusation, and trial of suspects, and establishes the fines and forms of retribution for those found guilty.
Criminal law is just one of the tools used by organized societies to safeguard individuals' rights and guarantee the survival of the group. In addition, there are the moral principles taught by families, schools, and religion; workplace and factory rules; laws of civil life enforced by regular police powers; and the penalties accessible through tort claims.
To learn more about Criminal laws visit;
https://brainly.com/question/1205493
#SPJ4
when do the courts choose how to detain a juvenile and decide if the case will be handled formally or informally?
why can senators use senatorial courtesy ?
Senators can use senatorial courtesy as a way to influence the nomination and confirmation process for federal judges and other presidential appointments.
This practice allows senators to give their approval or disapproval of a nominee before the nomination is officially made. If a senator from the same party as the president disapproves of a nominee from their home state, it is considered a "courtesy" for the president to withdraw the nomination. This practice helps to ensure that the nominees are acceptable to the senators from the state in which they will serve. However, it can also lead to delays and obstruction in the confirmation process.
Learn more about senatorial courtesy brainly.com/question/12528524
#SPJ11
Huey long criticized roosevelt’s new deal policies because he believed.
Huey Long disagreed with Roosevelt's New Deal initiatives because he thought more extreme measures were required to alleviate poverty.
What can be done to alleviate poverty?
Applications for economic protection, together with those for social protection, food assistance, tax credits, and housing assistance, can help create opportunity by reducing short-term poverty and hardship and, in doing so, enhancing children's long-term outcomes.
Each year, the government allots a budget to each faculty to cover its regular expenses, which include books, maintenance, stationery, and strength. Compared to academic institutions that are permitted to set their own prices, no-price colleges receive greater money.
With the help of its strategy, the Philippine government hopes to end extreme poverty by 2040. Additionally, the government has implemented a number of policies and reforms to reduce poverty by focusing on the financial system as a whole, healthcare, and education.
The social security system is one of the main government policies to address extreme poverty levels. The government's primary strategy for reducing poverty is social safety programs, while secondary initiatives include free or heavily discounted housing and vital services.
To learn more about alleviating poverty visit;
https://brainly.com/question/14285856
#SPJ4
according to the rule of law a government leader: a) is excluded from "we the people". b) Has absolute authority to make decisions for everyone. c) Must follow the law like everyone else.
According to the rule of law a government leader must follow the law like everyone else.
Hence. the correct option is C.
Rule of law is the mechanism or a norm that supports the equality of all citizens before the law, secures a nonarbitrary form of government, and more generally prevents the arbitrary use of power. The constitution protects persons rights and the rule of law describes constitution as the source of law, each law is derived from the constitution and it cannot override the general provisions of the constitution. The three major elements of rule of law are supremacy of law, equality to everyone before law and predominance of law i.e. court should be free from external influence.
To know more about "rule of law " visit-
brainly.com/question/12469633
#SPJ4
Two unrelated passengers on a small plane sued the pilot of the plane for injuries suffered during a rough landing after a sightseeing trip. They filed a negligence action in federal district court with the younger passenger, who had only minor injuries, claiming $5,000 in damages and the older passenger, whose injuries were life-threatening, claiming $95,000. The two passengers are citizens of the same state. The pilot is a citizen of another state. The pilot moved to dismiss the younger passenger's claim for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction.
Should the court dismiss the younger passenger's claim?
Joinder of Parties
No, the court may not need to dismiss the younger passenger's claim for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction because the court can exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the claim.
In this case, the court can exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the younger passenger's claim because it shares a common nucleus of operative fact with the older passenger's claim, which falls within the court's original subject matter jurisdiction. However, supplemental jurisdiction is not allowed if a supplemental claim contaminates diversity or seeks less than $75,000 in damages. Since both passengers are from the same state, there is no contamination.
To know more about subject-matter jurisdiction, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/30386872
#SPJ4
how did the articles of confederation lay the groundwork for america’s future political structure?
The Articles of Confederation laid the groundwork for America’s future political structure by establishing a government with a weak central government and strong state governments.
The Articles also set up a unicameral legislature, or Congress, with limited powers. Finally, the Articles provided for a system of checks and balances that limited the power of the central government and gave the states more control over their own affairs.
These features of the Articles of Confederation would become the basis for the Constitution of the United States and the federal system of government that we have today.
To learn more about Articles of Confederation link is here
brainly.com/question/13608970
#SPJ4
as a provision of the land ordinance of 1785, (1) one lot in each township was set aside for a _____________.
As a provision of the Land Ordinance of 1785, (1) one lot in each township was set aside for a public school. This was done in order to promote education and ensure that each township had access to a school for its residents.
What is the Land Ordinance of 1785?The Land Ordinance of 1785 was an important piece of legislation that helped to organize the settlement and development of the Northwest Territory.
It established a system for surveying and dividing the land into townships, and set aside one lot in each township for the purpose of building a public school.
This provision helped to promote education and ensure that each township had access to a school for its residents.
Learn More about Land Ordinance of 1785 at https://brainly.com/question/30082465
#SPJ11
As a provision of the Land Ordinance of 1785, one lot in each township was set aside for a public school.
This was done to ensure that education was a priority in the newly formed townships and that there was land specifically designated for this purpose.
¿What is the Land Ordinance Law of 1785?The Land Ordinance of 1785 was a law passed by the United States Congress that outlined the process for dividing and selling land in the Northwest Territory.
It created a system of townships, each consisting of 36 square miles, and further divided each township into 36 one-square-mile sections.
One of these sections was set aside for the purpose of building a public school, demonstrating the importance of education in the newly formed townships.
Another question about Law in https://brainly.com/question/20585839
#SPJ11
Under the Articles, the national government included a way to make, enforce and interpret laws.a. trueb. false
Concerns relationships between individuals or between individuals and the governmenta)criminal lawb)civil lawc)international lawd)military law
Out of the choices of alternatives provided above, it may be stated that the Civil Law is the one that takes care of the concerns of the relationships that exist between the individuals or individuals and the government. Therefore, the option B holds true.
The civil law may be taken into interpretation or consideration as the type of law that brings into account the matters related to the disputes or concerns related to the individuals and civilians of the country, and also provides a number of protections and regulations being made thereunder.
Learn more about civil law here:
https://brainly.com/question/14788507
#SPJ4
Concerns relationships between individuals or between individuals and the government
a)criminal law
b)civil law
c)international law
d)military law
Who was the designated survivor for the State of the Union?
For the 2021 State of the Union, the designated survivor was Secretary of Transportation Pete Buttigieg.
The designated survivor is a member of the president’s cabinet who is not in attendance at the State of the Union address in order to ensure continuity of government in the event of a catastrophic event.
The designated survivor is typically chosen from a member of the president's cabinet who is not affiliated with the president's political party. The designated survivor is taken to an undisclosed location, where they remain until the end of the address.
To learn more about catastrophic event link is here
brainly.com/question/30634248
#SPJ4
which amendments address the rights of the accused? a) The fourth amandement. b) The fifth amandement. c) The sixth amandement. d) The seventh amandement
The sixth amendment of the constitution of United States address the rights of the accused.
Hence, the correct option is C.
The amendment was ratified in houses in the year 1791 by the required three-fourths majority of states, and the 6th amendment of the constitution of United States protects the rights of the criminal defendants or accused. It includes the right to a public trial without unnecessary delay, the right to a lawyer, the right to an impartial jury, and the right to know about accused and the nature of the charges and evidence against the accused. It addresses an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed.
To know more about "sixth amendment" visit-
brainly.com/question/3044508
#SPJ4
who announces the president at the state of the union
The House of Representatives Sergeant-at-Arms announces the President's arrival. The President is then introduced and goes on to address the Congress.
It is customary for one member of the president's cabinet to skip the State of the Union speech.
Near the start of most calendar years, the president of the United States addresses a joint session of Congress with his annual message on the state of the union, also known as the State of the Union Address (SOTU).
The State of the Union Address typically includes updates on the nation's finances, economy, news, agenda, advancements, as well as the president's legislative priorities and agenda items.
Learn more about " state of the union " to visit here;
https://brainly.com/question/14372354
#SPJ4
What is the right to privacy and how is it protected by the Constitution?
As a result of the guarantee of life and liberty in Article 21 of the Constitution, privacy is a right that is guaranteed by the constitution.
The right to privacy in India has changed during the past 60 years as a result of various rulings. Over the years, there has been disagreement over whether the right to privacy is a fundamental right due to inconsistency from two early rulings. The evaluation and interpretation of constitutional provisions must guarantee that they are in line with the international human rights treaties that India has ratified. According to the court, privacy is a fundamental prerequisite for the meaningful exercise of other guaranteed freedoms.
To learn more about right to privacy visit;
https://brainly.com/question/2033492
#SPJ4
when a tortfeasor is willful in bringing about a particular event that caused harm, it falls into which category of tort?
Option E is Correct. It falls under the Intentional category of tort when a tortfeasor willfully causes an incident that results in harm.
A tortfeasor is a person who commits a tort; this person is "liable" rather than guilty. The purpose of tort liability is to compensate the tort victim financially for the harm that the tortfeasor inflicted. There are further remedies available, such as injunctions or restitution.
When the defendant's activities were disproportionately risky, negligent torts occurred. Strict liability torts, in contrast to deliberate and negligent torts, are independent of the level of care that the defendant used. Courts in strict liability instances instead concentrate on whether a specific outcome or harm manifested. A sort of liability known as "fault" requires the plaintiff to demonstrate that the defendant's actions were at fault.
Learn more about tortfeasor Visit: brainly.com/question/28136021
#SPJ4
Correct Question:
When a tortfeasor is willful in bringing about a particular event that caused harm, it falls into which category of tort?
A) None of these
B) Partial liability
C) Negligence
D) Strict liability
E) Intentional
Munten Company's management derives four estimates relating to the possible tax benefit of its tax position. The amount that Munten should recognize relating to this potential tax benefit is the
The largest amount with a cumulative greater than 50 percent chance of realization is the amount that is to be recognized as being in relation to the potential tax benefit for Munten.
The tax benefit may be taken into interpretation as the benefit that an individual derives from the payment or nonpayment of taxes within the stipulated time of the previous year during the time of assessment being made in the context of the same. In the above situation, the largest amount is the amount to be considered for tax benefit.
Learn more about tax benefits here:
https://brainly.com/question/1581158
#SPJ4
How many Supreme Court justices are Republican?
Laws are made to protect the public as a whole from the harmful acts of othersa)criminalb)civilc)internationald)military
Criminal laws are made to protect the public as a whole from the harmful acts of others.
So, option A is the correct answer.
Criminal laws regulate the criminal acts of the individuals, groups or associations. These criminal acts are addressed in the statutes. It can also be termed as penal laws because the criminal acts will lead to the punishment and fines.
It includes harmful or criminal acts such as theft, threatening a person about his/her body or property, robbery, defamation and many more.
Therefore, the correct answer is option A.
To know more about theft, click here: brainly.com/question/17224809
#SPJ4
THREE POLICYMAKERS ARE DISCUSSING HOW TO ENSURE A JUST DISTRIBUTION OF A NATIONAL CAKE
Answer:
A just distribution of a national cake refers to the equitable distribution of resources and benefits within a country among its citizens. This concept is important because it ensures that everyone has equal access to opportunities and resources to improve their standard of living. Three policymakers discussing how to ensure a just distribution of a national cake may consider the following:
Redistribution of wealth: The policymakers may propose policies that involve redistributing wealth from the rich to the poor. This could be done through progressive taxation, subsidies, and transfer programs.
Providing basic services: The policymakers may focus on providing basic services like healthcare, education, and housing to all citizens, regardless of their economic status.
Improving access to job opportunities: The policymakers may aim to create job opportunities in underdeveloped regions to reduce the gap between rich and poor.
Encouraging entrepreneurship: The policymakers may also encourage entrepreneurship and provide support to small businesses, particularly in rural areas.
Promoting equality: The policymakers may promote equality of opportunities, including education, healthcare, and employment.
Explanation:
By considering these and other related measures, the policymakers may ensure that the national cake is distributed justly, leading to a more equitable and sustainable future for all citizens.
ALLEN
Answer:citizien promotion
Explanation:
what jobs can you get with a criminal justice degree?
From a criminal justice degree,we can get jobs in stores, showrooms, public hotels etc.
A criminal justice degree is an interdisciplinary review. It integrates regulation, human science, brain research, policy management, and then some. With the degree, you'll figure out how the legal framework functions, from policing the courts.
While acquiring a criminal justice degree, you will get to grasp the framework according to the point of view of the two hoodlums and casualties. Numerous understudies decide to progress forward with the way to turn into a legal counselor, yet others might enter governmental issues or seek after a situation in scholarly community showing criminal justice degree.
Five areas where we can enter via criminal justice degree
RevisionsPolicingCountry SecurityPrivate SecuritySocial Justice ServicesCriminology And ExaminationTo know more about criminal justice,visit here:
https://brainly.com/question/24622613
#SPJ4
What 5 global companies have the highest number of employees?
The following list of five multinational corporations with the highest employee to revenue ratios includes:
$576 billion Walmart (WMT).Amazon (AMZN) is worth $486 billion.$443 billion Petro China (PTR).$394 billion Saudi Aramco (2222.SR).$388 billion is the value of Apple Inc.With nearly four million employees combined, Walmart and Amazon lead the retail industry as the largest employers worldwide. Statista reports that recent information has shown that the defense industry employs the most people globally.
With over 39% of the estimated total number of workers, the manufacturing industry is the largest employer, followed by the education sector with 22%. The majority of Indian workers are employed in the primary sector. The agricultural industry makes up the majority of the primary sector.
Learn more about employees Visit: brainly.com/question/27404382
#SPJ4
The classic Millikan oil drop experiment was the first to obtain an accurate measurement of the charge on an electron. In it, oil drops were suspended against gravity by a vertical electric field. microscopeAssume the oil drop to be 1.40 μμm in radius and have a density of 939 kg/m33(a) Find the weight of the drop.(b) If the drop has a single excess electron, find the magnitude of the electric field strength needed to balance its weight.
A - The weight of the oil drop is 1.13× [tex]10^{-13}[/tex]3 N, B- the magnitude of the electric field strength needed to balance the weight of the oil drop is 7.05 x [tex]10^{-4}[/tex] N/C.
A- To find the weight of the oil drop, we can use the formula:
weight = density x volume x gravity
volume = (4/3)[tex]πr^3[/tex]
volume = (4/3)π[tex](1.40 μm)^3[/tex] = 1.091 x[tex]10^{-14} m^{3}[/tex]
weight = 939[tex]kg/m^{3}[/tex]x 1.091 x [tex]10^{-14}[/tex] [tex]m^{3}[/tex] x 9.81 [tex]m/s^{2}[/tex]= 1.13 x [tex]10^{-13}[/tex]N
Therefore, the weight of the oil drop is 1.13 x[tex]10^{-13}[/tex]N.
B- To find the magnitude of the electric field strength needed to balance the weight of the oil drop, we can use the formula:
electric field strength = weight / (number of excess electrons x charge on one electron)
electric field strength = 1.13 x[tex]10^{-13}[/tex]N / (1 x 1.602 x [tex]10^{-19}[/tex] C) = 7.05 x [tex]10^{4[/tex] N/C
Therefore, the magnitude of the electric field strength needed to balance the weight of the oil drop is 7.05 x [tex]10^{4}[/tex] N/C.
Learn more about electric field strength here:
https://brainly.com/question/28227168
#SPJ4
