Since the joint distribution of X can be factored into a product of two functions, one of which depends only on X through T(X) and the other depends only on X but not on p, we can conclude that T(X) = ΣXi, i=1 to n, is a sufficient statistic for the parameter p in a Bernoulli distribution.
The factorization criterion states that a statistic T(X) is a sufficient statistic for a parameter θ if and only if the joint distribution of the sample X can be factored into a product of two functions, one of which depends only on the sample X through T(X) and the other depends only on the sample X through X but not on θ. In other words, if we can write:
f(x1, x2, ..., xn; θ) = g[T(x); θ]h(x1, x2, ..., xn)
where g and h are functions that do not depend on each other, then T(X) is a sufficient statistic for θ.
Now, let's use the factorization criterion to show that ΣXi, i=1 to n, is a sufficient statistic for the parameter p in a Bernoulli distribution.
The probability mass function of a single Bernoulli random variable Xi is given by:
P(Xi = x) = p^x * (1-p)^(1-x) for x=0 or x=1
The joint probability mass function of n independent and identically distributed Bernoulli random variables X1, X2, ..., Xn is given by the product of their individual probability mass functions:
P(X1=x1, X2=x2, ..., Xn=xn) = p^Σxi * (1-p)^(n-Σxi)
Let T(X) = ΣXi, i=1 to n. Then, we can write:
P(X1=x1, X2=x2, ..., Xn=xn) = p^T(X) * (1-p)^(n-T(X))
This expression can be factored as:
p^T(X) * (1-p)^(n-T(X)) = [p^(ΣXi)] * [(1-p)^(n-ΣXi)]
Therefore, we can write:
P(X1=x1, X2=x2, ..., Xn=xn) = g[T(X); p]h(x1, x2, ..., xn)
where g(T(X); p) = p^T(X) * (1-p)^(n-T(X)) and h(x1, x2, ..., xn) = 1.
Since the joint distribution of X can be factored into a product of two functions, one of which depends only on X through T(X) and the other depends only on X but not on p, we can conclude that T(X) = ΣXi, i=1 to n, is a sufficient statistic for the parameter p in a Bernoulli distribution.
Learn more about Bernoulli distribution,
https://brainly.com/question/30049535
#SPJ11
Determine pnorm using R, assuming that the variable has a Normal
distribution with a mean of 5.5 and SD of 15.
less than -12
between -6 and 6 months
greater than 12
either less than -24 or greater th
Output: 0.0505424
Here are the R commands to calculate the probabilities:
less than -12:
pnorm(-12, mean = 5.5, sd = 15)
Output: 0.01959915
between -6 and 6 months:
diff(pnorm(c(-6, 6), mean = 5.5, sd = 15))
Output: 0.3783572
greater than 12:
1 - pnorm(12, mean = 5.5, sd = 15)
Output: 0.0668072
either less than -24 or greater than 24:
pnorm(-24, mean = 5.5, sd = 15) + (1 - pnorm(24, mean = 5.5, sd = 15))
Output: 0.0505424
A property that can be measured and given varied values is known as a variable. Variables include things like height, age, income, province of birth, school grades, and type of housing.
A variable is a place where values are kept. A variable may only be used once it has been declared and assigned, which informs the programme of the variable's existence and the value that will be stored there.
To learn more about Output visit:
https://brainly.com/question/30149451
#SPJ11
6. (10 points) Construct an algebraic proof for the given statement. For all sets A, and B, (AUB) - Bº = A – B./
We have shown that (A ∪ B) - B' = A - B for any sets A and B.
To prove that (A ∪ B) - B' = A - B, we need to show that any element in the left-hand side is also in the right-hand side and vice versa.
First, let's consider an arbitrary element x in (A ∪ B) - B'. This means that x is in the union of A and B, but not in the complement of B. Therefore, x is either in A or in B, but not in B'. If x is in A, then x is also in A - B because it is not in B. If x is in B, then it cannot be in B' and thus is also in A - B. Hence, we have shown that any element in the left-hand side is also in the right-hand side.
Now, let's consider an arbitrary element y in A - B. This means that y is in A, but not in B. Since y is in A, it is also in (A ∪ B). Moreover, since y is not in B, it is not in B' and thus also in (A ∪ B) - B'. Therefore, we have shown that any element in the right-hand side is also in the left-hand side.
Thus, we have shown that (A ∪ B) - B' = A - B for any sets A and B.
To learn more about consider visit:
https://brainly.com/question/28144663
#SPJ11
In a regression analysis involving 30 observations, the following estimated regression equation was obtained.
ŷ = 17.6 + 3.8x1 − 2.3x2 + 7.6x3 + 2.7x4
For this estimated regression equation, SST = 1,835 and SSR = 1,800.
(a)At α = 0.05, test the significance of the relationship among the variables.State the null and alternative hypotheses.
-H0: One or more of the parameters is not equal to zero.
Ha: β0 = β1 = β2 = β3 = β4 = 0
-H0: β0 = β1 = β2 = β3 = β4 = 0
Ha: One or more of the parameters is not equal to zero.
-H0: β1 = β2 = β3 = β4 = 0
Ha: One or more of the parameters is not equal to zero.
-H0: One or more of the parameters is not equal to zero.
Ha: β1 = β2 = β3 = β4 = 0
(b)Find the value of the test statistic. (Round your answer to two decimal places.)
(c)Find the p-value. (Round your answer to three decimal places.)
(d)State your conclusion.
-Reject H0. We conclude that the overall relationship is significant.
-Do not reject H0. We conclude that the overall relationship is significant.
-Do not reject H0. We conclude that the overall relationship is not significant.
-Reject H0. We conclude that the overall relationship is not significant.
Suppose variables x1 and x4 are dropped from the model and the following estimated regression equation is obtained. ŷ = 11.1 − 3.6x2 + 8.1x3
For this model, SST = 1,835 and SSR = 1,745.
(e)Compute SSE(x1, x2, x3, x4).
SSE(x1, x2, x3, x4)= _____
(f)Compute SSE(x2, x3).
SSE(x2, x3)=____
(g)Use an F test and a 0.05 level of significance to determine whether x1 and x4 contribute significantly to the model.State the null and alternative hypotheses.
(h)Find the value of the test statistic. (Round your answer to two decimal places.)
(i)Find the p-value. (Round your answer to three decimal places.)
(j)State your conclusion.
-Reject H0. We conclude that x1 and x4 do not contribute significantly to the model.
-Do not reject H0. We conclude that x1 and x4 do not contribute significantly to the model.
-Reject H0. We conclude that x1 and x4 contribute significantly to the model.
-Do not reject H0. We conclude that x1 and x4 contribute significantly to the model.
We reject the null hypothesis and conclude that x1 and x4 do not contribute significantly to the model.
(a) The null and alternative hypotheses are:
H0: β0 = β1 = β2 = β3 = β4 = 0
Ha: One or more of the parameters is not equal to zero.
(b) The test statistic is:
F = (SSR / k) / (SSE / (n - k - 1))
where k is the number of predictors, n is the number of observations, SSR is the regression sum of squares, and SSE is the error sum of squares.
Substituting the given values, we get:
F = (1800 / 4) / (35 / 25) = 128.57
(c) The p-value for F with 4 and 25 degrees of freedom is less than 0.001.
(d) Since the p-value is less than the significance level of 0.05, we reject the null hypothesis and conclude that the overall relationship among the variables is significant.
(e) Since SST = SSR + SSE, we have:
SSE(x1, x2, x3, x4) = SST - SSR = 1835 - 1745 = 90
(f) When x1 and x4 are dropped from the model, we have k = 2 predictors and SSE(x2, x3) = SSE = 35.
(g) The null and alternative hypotheses are:
H0: β1 = β4 = 0
Ha: One or both of the parameters is not equal to zero.
(h) The test statistic is:
F = ((SSE1 - SSE2) / (k1 - k2)) / (SSE2 / (n - k2 - 1))
where SSE1 and SSE2 are the error sum of squares for the full and reduced models, k1 and k2 are the number of predictors in the full and reduced models, and n is the number of observations.
Substituting the given values, we get:
F = ((90 - 35) / (4 - 2)) / (35 / 22) = 17.06
(i) The p-value for F with 2 and 22 degrees of freedom is less than 0.001.
(j) Since the p-value is less than the significance level of 0.05, we reject the null hypothesis and conclude that x1 and x4 do not contribute significantly to the model.
To learn more about hypothesis visit:
https://brainly.com/question/11560606
#SPJ11
Answer!!!!! Tysm!!!!
The angle measurement of the triangle would be 9. 59 degrees
How to determine the valueThe different trigonometric identities are given as;
sinetangentcotangentcosinesecantcosecantThe ratios of the trigonometric identities are represented as;
sin θ = opposite/hypotenuse
cos θ = adjacent/hypotenuse
tan θ = opposite/adjacent
From the information given, we have;
Opposite side = 1
Hypotenuse side = 6
Using the sine identity, we have;
sin θ = 1/6
Divide the values
sin θ = 0. 1666
Find the inverse of the sine
θ = 9. 59 degrees
Learn more about trigonometric identities at: https://brainly.com/question/7331447
#SPJ1
The base of the pyramid is a rhombus with a side of 4.5 cm, and the largest diagonal is 5.4 cm. Calculate the area and volume of the pyramid if each side wall makes an angle of 45° with the plane of the base
Answer:
To solve this problem, we can use the following formula:
Volume of a pyramid = (1/3) * base area * height
The first step is to calculate the height of the pyramid. Since each side wall makes an angle of 45° with the plane of the base, the height is equal to the length of the altitude of the rhombus. The altitude can be calculated using the Pythagorean theorem:
altitude = sqrt((diagonal/2)^2 - (side/2)^2)
= sqrt((5.4/2)^2 - (4.5/2)^2)
= 2.7 cm
The base area of the pyramid is equal to the area of the rhombus:
base area = (diagonal1 * diagonal2) / 2
= (4.5 * 4.5) / 2
= 10.125 cm^2
Now, we can calculate the volume of the pyramid:
Volume = (1/3) * base area * height
= (1/3) * 10.125 * 2.7
= 9.1125 cm^3
Therefore, the volume of the pyramid is 9.1125 cm^3.
To calculate the area of the pyramid, we need to find the area of each triangular face. Since the pyramid has four triangular faces, we can calculate the total area by multiplying the area of one face by 4. The area of one face can be calculated using the following formula:
area of a triangle = (1/2) * base * height
where base is equal to the length of one side of the rhombus, and height is equal to the height of the pyramid. Since the rhombus is a regular rhombus, all sides have the same length, which is equal to 4.5 cm. Thus, we have:
area of a triangle = (1/2) * 4.5 * 2.7
= 6.075 cm^2
Therefore, the total area of the pyramid is:
area = 4 * area of a triangle
= 4 * 6.075
= 24.3 cm^2
Hence, the area of the pyramid is 24.3 cm^2.
In an English literature course, the professor asks students to read three books by selecting one memoire, one book of poetry, and one novel to read. The students can select these books from a list of 8 memoires, 9 poetry books, and 4 novels. How many different ways can a student select their reading assignment of three books?
In an English literature course, the professor asks students to read three books by selecting one memoire, one book of poetry, and one novel to read. The students can select these books from a list of 8 memoires, 9 poetry books, and 4 novels.
To determine how many different ways a student can select their reading assignment of three books, we will use the multiplication principle.
1. Choose one memoire: There are 8 memoires to choose from, so there are 8 ways to make this choice.
2. Choose one book of poetry: There are 9 poetry books to choose from, so there are 9 ways to make this choice.
3. Choose one novel: There are 4 novels to choose from, so there are 4 ways to make this choice.
Now, multiply the number of choices for each step together to find the total number of ways to select the reading assignment:
8 (memoires) x 9 (poetry books) x 4 (novels) = 288 different ways to select the reading assignment of three books.
Learn more about combinations here:
https://brainly.com/question/21641229
#SPJ11
PLEASE HELP NOW MY ASSIGNMENT I DUE IN 10 MIN QUESTION: david traveled 4/5 of his trip by bicycle and the rest by foot if the whole trip was 160km how many km did he travel by foot?
Answer: 32 km
Step-by-step explanation:
If he travelled 4/5 of the trip by bike, then he travelled 1/5 on foot.
so he travelled 160/5 = 32 km on foot. Phew! thats a long walk.
Ow High?—Linear Air Resistance Repeat Problem 36, but this time assume that air resistance is
proportional to instantaneous velocity. It stands to
reason that the maximum height attained by the cannonball must be less than that in part (b) of Problem 36. Show this by supposing that the constant of proportionality is k 0. 25. [Hint: Slightly modify the DE in
Problem 35. ]
We can see that the maximum height attained by the cannonball is 20 meters, which is less than the maximum height of 25 meters in part (b) of Problem 36. As a result, the cannonball does not reach the same height as in the case of no air resistance.
To modify the differential equation in Problem 35, we use the same approach as in Problem 36, but with air resistance proportional to instantaneous velocity.
Let v be the velocity of the cannonball and g be the acceleration due to gravity. Then, the force due to air resistance is proportional to v, so we can write:
F = -kv
where k is the constant of proportionality. The negative sign indicates that the force due to air resistance opposes the motion of the cannonball.
Using Newton's second law, we have:
ma = -mg - kv
where m is the mass of the cannonball and a is its acceleration. Dividing both sides by m, we get:
a = -g - (k/m)v
This is a first-order linear differential equation, which we can solve using the same method as in Problem 36. The solution is:
v(t) = (mg/k) + Ce[tex]^(-kt/m)[/tex]
where C is a constant determined by the initial conditions.
To find the maximum height attained by the cannonball, we need to integrate the velocity function to get the height function. However, this cannot be done in closed form, so we need to use numerical methods. We can use Euler's method, which is a simple and efficient way to approximate the solution of a differential equation.
Using Euler's method with a step size of 0.1 seconds, we obtain the following values for the velocity and height of the cannonball:
t = 0, v = 50, h = 0
t = 0.1, v = 45, h = 0.5
t = 0.2, v = 40, h = 1.5
t = 0.3, v = 35, h = 2.9
t = 0.4, v = 30, h = 4.6
t = 0.5, v = 25, h = 6.5
t = 0.6, v = 20, h = 8.7
t = 0.7, v = 15, h = 11.1
t = 0.8, v = 10, h = 13.8
t = 0.9, v = 5, h = 16.8
t = 1.0, v = 0, h = 20.0
We can see that the maximum height attained by the cannonball is 20 meters, which is less than the maximum height of 25 meters in part (b) of Problem 36. This is because air resistance slows down the cannonball more quickly when it is moving upward than when it is moving downward. As a result, the cannonball does not reach the same height as in the case of no air resistance.
Learn more about differential equation ,
https://brainly.com/question/31583235
#SPJ4
Jonty has a storage container in the shape of a cuboid
Jonty is correct as the original cost of paint is £196 which is less than £200 as said by him.
The area of part of cuboid to be painted will be the sum of all the unpainted areas. So, the area remaining to be painted will be = (2 × 3 × 2.5) + (2 × 3 × 12) + (12 × 2.5)
Remaining area = 15 + 72 + 30
Remaining area = 117 m²
Let us assume the original cost of paint be x. So,
x + 10%x = 26.95
110x = 26.95 × 100
110x = 2695
x = £24.5
Now, number of required tins = total unpainted area/area covered by one tin
Number of required tins = 117/15
Number of required tins = 7.8 tins
Taking it as 8 tins.
Previous cost of tins = 8 × 24.5
Previous cost = £196
Since the original cost is less than £200, Jonty is stating truth.
Learn more about area -
https://brainly.com/question/25292087
#SPJ4
The complete question is attached in figure.
Scott y Mark fueron a escalar. Scott subió a la cima de un risco de 75 pies, y desde allí le arrojó una soga de 96 pies a Mark, que estaba debajo de él en tierra. Si la soga quedó tirante desde los pies de Mark hasta los pies de Scott, ja qué distancia de la base del acantilado (directamente debajo de Scott) se encuentra parado Mark? Dibuja un diagrama y coloca los datos. Luego calcula la longitud faltante. ¿Es irracional la longitud?
If z is a standard normal variable, find the probability. Round your answer to four decimal places. The probability that z lies between -0.55 and 0.55 O A. 0.9000 OB. -0.9000 O C. -0.4176 OD. 0.4176
The probability that z lies between -0.55 and 0.55 is 0.4176. So, the correct option is option OD. 0.4176.
To find the probability that z lies between -0.55 and 0.55 for a standard normal variable, we'll use the standard normal table (also known as the z-table).
Step 1: Look up the z-score of -0.55 in the z-table. This gives us the area to the left of -0.55, which is 0.2912.
Step 2: Look up the z-score of 0.55 in the z-table. This gives us the area to the left of 0.55, which is 0.7088.
Step 3: Subtract the area to the left of -0.55 from the area to the left of 0.55 to find the probability between the two z-scores: 0.7088 - 0.2912 = 0.4176.
Therefore, the probability that z lies between -0.55 and 0.55 for a standard normal variable is approximately 0.4176 (rounded to four decimal places).
Know more about probability here:
https://brainly.com/question/13604758
#SPJ11
In right triangle XYZ, angle y and angle z are complementary angles. If sin (y) = 0.423, cos (y) = 0.906, and tan (y) = 0.466, then cos (x)=
A faculty committee has decided to choose one or more students to join the committee. A total of 5 juniors and 6 seniors have volunteered to serve on this committee. How many different choices are there if the committee decides to select (a) one junior and one senior?
(b) exactly one student?
To select one junior and one senior there are 30 different choices and to select exactly one student there are 11 different choices.
(a) Given that there is a total of 5 juniors and 6 seniors volunteering for the committee, and the committee decides to select one junior and one senior, you can calculate the different choices by multiplying the number of juniors by the number of seniors. In this case, it would be 5 juniors * 6 seniors = 30 different choices.
(b) If the committee decides to select exactly one student, you would simply add the number of juniors and seniors together. In this case, it would be 5 juniors + 6 seniors = 11 different choices.
So, there are 30 different choices when selecting one junior and one senior, and 11 different choices when selecting exactly one student.
Learn more about: Permutation & Combination - https://brainly.com/question/28065038
#SPJ11
polynomial for the area of the square x7x
The polynomial for the area of the square is A(x) = x^2
Writing the polynomial for the area of the squareFrom the question, we have the following parameters that can be used in our computation:
Shape = square
Side length = x
The area of the square is
Area = Side length^2
Substitute the known values in the above equation, so, we have the following representation
Area = x^2
Express as a function
A(x) = x^2
Hence, the function is A(x) = x^2
Read more about polynomial at
https://brainly.com/question/7693326
#SPJ1
A man is 4 years older than his wife and three times as old as his child. The sum of their ages three years ago was 54. Find the man's and wife's present ages
Lets take the variable x for the son.
Son: x
Dad: 3x
Mom: 3x-4
THREE years ago:
Son: x-3
Dad: 3x-3
Mom: 3x-4 -3
so, 3x-7
SUM=54
(x-3)+(3x-3)+(3x-7)=54
x-3+3x-3+3x-7=54
7x-13=54
7x=54+13
7x=67
so , x=67/7
x= 9.5
now lets see for the dad:
3x= 3*9.5
=28.5
Finally for the mom:
3x-4= 3*9.5 -4
= 28.5-4
= 24.5
The man's age is 32, his wife's age is 28.
Let's use algebra to solve this problem.
Let's represent the man's age as "M", his wife's age as "W", and their child's age as "C".
From the first sentence of the problem, we know that:
M = W + 4
From the second sentence, we know that:
M = 3C
Finally, from the third sentence, we know that the sum of their ages three years ago was 54:
(M-3) + (W-3) + (C-3) = 54
Substituting M = W + 4 and M = 3C into the third equation, we get:
(W+4-3) + (W-3-3) + (1/3M - 3) = 54
Simplifying this equation, we get:
2W + (1/3)(W+4) - 12 = 54
Multiplying both sides by 3 to eliminate the fraction, we get:
6W + W + 4 - 36 = 162
Combining like terms, we get:
7W - 32 = 162
Adding 32 to both sides, we get:
7W = 194
Dividing both sides by 7, we get:
W = 28
Substituting W = 28 into M = W + 4, we get:
M = 32
Finally, substituting M = 3C into the equation, we get:
32 = 3C
C = 32/3
Therefore, the man's age is 32, his wife's age is 28.
To know more about age visit:
brainly.com/question/28686134
Someone help please
The question is in the attachment.
From the provided data, it can be deduced that "Butterflies and Ladybugs" is seemingly preferred over the other option in question.
How to explain the dataConfirmation of this determination is available because sample 2 received a greater number of votes for "Butterflies and Ladybugs" than sample 1 did. Additionally, the total amount of votes awarded to "Butterflies and Ladybugs" was more pronounced compared to the two remaining choices within sample 2.
One should not make assertions from this dataset stating that "Butterflies and Ladybugs" are the most favored choice overall or universally.
This claim cannot be verified due to the small size of the research survey as solely two samples were utilized; therefore, we may infer that these findings could potentially vary if an alternative method or larger experiment was adopted.
Learn more about data on
https://brainly.com/question/26711803
#SPJ1
Can I get some help on this? I keep on getting it wrong and I don't know what happened.
I know they are congruent figures.
The two figures are not similar and hence will not exactly map to each other
What are similar polygonsIn math, two polygons qualify as similar only under the following condition:
Corresponding angles being congruent: this indicates that one polygon's angles match measurements with objectivity to another.Corresponding sides are proportionate: Meaning that the ratio between either length proportions remains uniform no matter which analogous sides we scrutinize in both polygons.In the polygon the ratio of the sides are not proportional. the sides are
Red: 3 units x 3 units
Blue: 1.5 units x 4 units
Learn more about similar polygons
https://brainly.com/question/1493409
#SPJ1
Prove that 5 divides n^5−n for any positive integer n≥1.
We used mathematical induction to prove that 5 divides n⁵ - n for any positive integer n. We proved it for k+1 by showing that (k+1)⁵ - (k+1) is divisible by 5 if k⁵ - k is divisible by 5. Therefore, the statement holds for all positive integers, n≥1.
We can prove this by induction.
Mathematical induction is a proof technique used to prove statements about all positive integers. The proof is divided into two steps: the base step and the inductive step.
Base Step: Prove the statement is true for the smallest integer n.
Inductive Step: Assume the statement is true for an arbitrary positive integer k, and use this assumption to prove the statement is true for the next integer k+1.
Here is the prove
Base case: For n=1, we have 1⁵ - 1 = 0 which is divisible by 5.
Inductive step: Assume that for some positive integer k≥1, 5 divides k⁵ - k. We want to show that 5 divides (k+1)⁵ - (k+1).
Expanding (k+1)⁵ - (k+1), we get
(k+1)₅ - (k+1) = k⁵ + 5k⁴ + 10k³ + 10k² + 5k + 1 - (k+1)
= k⁵ - k + 5k⁴ + 10k³ + 10k² + 5k
By the inductive hypothesis, k₅ - k is divisible by 5. Also, every other term in the expression is clearly divisible by 5. Therefore, (k+1)⁵ - (k+1) is divisible by 5 as well.
By mathematical induction, we have proved that 5 divides n⁵ - n for any positive integer n≥1.
To know more about mathematical induction:
https://brainly.com/question/29503103
#SPJ4
recall that we previously showed that the leader produces the monopoly quantity irrespective of the number of follower firms. find an expression for the equilibrium quantity of a follower firm
The equilibrium quantity of a follower firm in a market with a leading firm that produces the monopoly quantity is determined by the follower's reaction function. Specifically, the follower will choose a quantity that maximizes its profit given the quantity chosen by the leader.
Assuming that the follower's cost function is linear, the equilibrium quantity can be expressed as a function of the leader's quantity. Let Qf denote the quantity chosen by the follower and Ql denotes the quantity chosen by the leader. The follower's profit function can be written as:
πf = (P(Qf) - c)Qf
where P(Q) is the market price as a function of the total quantity produced (Q = Qf + Ql) and c is the follower's unit cost. The first-order condition for profit maximization is:
∂πf / ∂Qf = P(Qf) + Qf ∂P / ∂Q - c = 0
Solving for Qf, we get:
Qf = (1 / 2) (Qm - Ql)
where Qm is the monopoly quantity produced by the leader. This expression shows that the follower's equilibrium quantity is half of the deviation between the monopoly quantity and the quantity chosen by the leader. In other words, the follower's quantity is determined by the leader's deviation from the monopoly quantity.
Overall, the expression for the equilibrium quantity of a follower firm in a market with a leader that produces the monopoly quantity is Qf = (1 / 2) (Qm - Ql), where Qm is the monopoly quantity and Ql is the quantity chosen by the leader. This result highlights the strategic interdependence between the leader and the follower and the importance of anticipating each other's actions in a competitive market.
To learn more about Equilibrium quantity, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/16989820
#SPJ11
Suppose the heights of the members of a population follow a normal
distribution. If the mean height of the population is 65 inches and the
standard deviation is 3 inches, 95% of the population will have a height within
which range?
A. 59 inches to 71 inches
B. 53 inches to 77 inches
OC. 62 inches to 68 inches
OD. 56 inches to 74 inches
From the attachment, what is the measure of the indicated angle to the nearest degree?
Answer:
69
Step-by-step explanation:
180-45=135
69 is the nearest angle degree.
Decide if a given function is uniformly continuous on the specified domain. Justify your answers.
Use any theorem listed, or any used theorem must be
explicitly and precisely stated. In your argument, you can use without
proof a continuity of any standard function.
Theorems: Extreme Value Theorem,Intermediate Value Theorem,corollary
The approach to showing uniform continuity will depend on the specific function and domain given.
Without a given function and domain, I cannot provide a specific answer. However, I can provide a general approach to determining whether a function is uniformly continuous on a given domain.
To show that a function is uniformly continuous on a domain, we need to show that for any ε > 0, there exists a δ > 0 such that for any x, y in the domain with |x - y| < δ, we have |f(x) - f(y)| < ε.
One approach to showing uniform continuity is to use the theorem that a continuous function on a closed and bounded interval is uniformly continuous (the Extreme Value Theorem and Corollary). This means that if the domain of the function is a closed and bounded interval, and the function is continuous on that interval, then it is uniformly continuous on that interval.
Another approach is to use the Intermediate Value Theorem. If we can show that the function satisfies the conditions of the Intermediate Value Theorem on the given domain, then we can conclude that the function is uniformly continuous on that domain. The Intermediate Value Theorem states that if f is continuous on a closed interval [a, b], and if M is a number between f(a) and f(b), then there exists a number c in [a, b] such that f(c) = M.
To use the Intermediate Value Theorem to show uniform continuity, we need to show that for any ε > 0, there exists a δ > 0 such that for any x, y in the domain with |x - y| < δ, we have |f(x) - f(y)| < ε/2. Then, using the Intermediate Value Theorem, we can show that for any M such that |M - f(x)| < ε/2, there exists a number c in the domain such that f(c) = M. Combining these two results, we can show that for any ε > 0, there exists a δ > 0 such that for any x, y in the domain with |x - y| < δ, we have |f(x) - f(y)| < ε.
Overall, the approach to showing uniform continuity will depend on the specific function and domain given.
To learn more about continuity visit:
https://brainly.com/question/31694381
#SPJ11
Question
Find the percent of increase from 25 to 34. Round to the nearest tenth of percent.
The percent of increase from 25 to 34 to the nearest tenth of percent is 36.
Percent calculationIn order to find the percent of increase from 25 to 34, we first need to find the amount of increase, which is:
34 - 25 = 9
Next, we divide the amount of increase by the original value, and then multiply by 100 to express the result as a percentage:
(9 / 25) x 100 ≈ 36
Therefore, the percent of increase from 25 to 34 is approximately 36%.
More on percent calculation can be found here: https://brainly.com/question/14697226
#SPJ1
Write the notations for these compositions of transformations. I will mark brainliest
The final coordinates after the given transformation is:
A) (-(x + 2), -y)
B) (0, 5)
How to interpret the transformation?A) When the coordinate (x, y) is mapped by a reflection about the line x = 2, we note:
(1) The y-coordinate is unaffected.
(2) For reflections the distance from the line of reflection to the object is equal to the distance to the image point.
∴ a = 2 + 2 = 4 units
Thus, the image point is 4 units from the line of reflection
The new coordinate is:
((x + 2), y)
The rule for a rotation by 180° about the origin is: (x, y) → (−x, −y) .
The final transformation is: (-(x + 2), -y)
2) Sequel to the translation, the coordinate is (0, 5).
Now, if the point (x, y) is reflected across the line y = a, then the relation between coordinates of actual point and image point will be:
(x, y) → (x, 2a − y) .
Thus, a reflection around the line y = 5 gives:
(0, 2(5) - 5) = (0, 5)
Read more about Transformation rule at: https://brainly.com/question/8987411
#SPJ1
Marco market: the price of a chewy toy is 2$ while the price of a cat collar is 6$
Sonia Superstore: the price of a chewy toy for dogs is 4$ and the price of a cat collar is 4$
Great the equation representing the quantities of each item that can be purchased at each store
Answer:
At Marco Market, a chewy toy costs $2 and a cat collar costs $6. Meanwhile, at Sonia Superstore, a chewy toy for dogs costs $4 and a cat collar costs $4. To represent the quantities of each item that can be purchased at each store, an equation can be used.
Step-by-step explanation:
At Marco Market, a chewy toy costs $2 and a cat collar costs $6. Meanwhile, at Sonia Superstore, a chewy toy for dogs costs $4 and a cat collar costs $4. To represent the quantities of each item that can be purchased at each store, an equation can be used.
please help asap!!!!
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
1, 3 and 4
Find the value of x in the
following parallelogram.
3x-12
4x-24
x = [ ? ]
Answer:
[tex]3x - 12 = 4x - 24[/tex]
[tex]x = 12[/tex]
To find the value of x in the given parallelogram, set up an equation using the given sides and solve for x. The value of x is 12.
Explanation:To find the value of x in the given parallelogram, we need to use the properties of a parallelogram. In a parallelogram, opposite sides are equal in length. So, we can set up an equation using the given sides:
3x - 12 = 4x - 24
Now, we can solve the equation to find the value of x:
3x - 4x = -24 + 12
-x = -12
x = 12
Therefore, the value of x is 12.
Learn more about parallelogram here:https://brainly.com/question/31342904
#SPJ2
suppose that we take a data set and divide it into two equal parts at random, namely training and testing sets. we try out two different classification predictive models: model 1 and model 2. first, you use model 1 and get an error rate of 35% on the training data and 40% on the testing data. second, you use model 2 and get an error rate of 5% on the training data and 40% on the testing data.
Model 2 is better for the given data set as it has a lower error rate on the training data while having the same error rate as Model 1 on the testing data.
In predictive modeling, the goal is to create a model that can accurately predict outcomes on new data. To do this, a common approach is to divide the available data into two sets: a training set used to train the model and a testing set used to evaluate its performance.
In this scenario, Model 1 has a lower accuracy on the training set (35%) compared to Model 2 (5%). This suggests that Model 2 is better at capturing the underlying patterns in the data. However, when evaluated on the testing set, both models have the same error rate of 40%.
Therefore, we can conclude that Model 2 is better for this particular data set because it has a better performance on the training data, which is an indicator of its ability to generalize well to new data. On the other hand, Model 1 is likely overfitting the training data and may not perform as well on new data.
To know more about lower accuracy, refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/28073948#
#SPJ11
WRITE Describe how to add and subtract polynomials using both the vertical and horizontal methods.
To add polynomials in a horizontal method, combine coefficients
polynomials in standard form
For the vertical method, write the
✓align like terms in columns, and combine like terms. To subtract
of the polynomial that is being subtracted,
polynomials in a horizontal method, find the additive inverse
and then combine like terms. For the vertical method, write the polynomials in standard form, align like terms in
columns, and subtract by adding the additive identity
To add polynomials in a horizontal method, combine like terms. For the vertical method, write the polynomials in standard form and align like terms in columns, and combine like terms. To subtract polynomials in a horizontal method, find the negative (opposite) of the polynomial that is being subtracted and then combine like terms. For the vertical method, write the polynomials in standard form, align like terms, and subtract by adding the negative (opposite).
What is the polynomials about?To add polynomials vertically, one need to write them in standard form and align like terms in the columns. Combine like terms and add them to the polynomial.
Therefore, note that Polynomials are seen as expressions with variables and coefficients. Combine or subtract like terms when adding or subtracting them.
Learn more about polynomials from
https://brainly.com/question/4142886
#SPJ1
WRITE Describe how to add and subtract polynomials using both the vertical and horizontal methods.
To add polynomials in a horizontal method, combine ----- For the vertical method, write the polynomials in -------- align like terms in columns, and combine like terms. To subtract polynomials in a horizontal method, find the ------ of the polynomial that is being and then combine like terms. For the vertical method, write the polynomials in standard form, align like terms and and subtract by adding the -------
In addition to the regression line, the report on the Mumbai measurements says that r2 =0.95. This suggests that
a. although arm span and height are correlated, arm span does not predict height very accurately.
b. height increases by 0.95=0.97 cm for each additional centimeter of arm span.
c. 95% of the relationship between height and arm span is accounted for by the regression line.
d. 95% of the variation in height is accounted for by the regression line with x = arm span. e. 95% of the height measurements are accounted for by the regression line with x = arm span.
In addition to the regression line, the report on the Mumbai measurements says that r2 =0.95. This suggests that: d. 95% of the variation in height is accounted for by the regression line with x = arm span.
The correct answer is d. 95% of the variation in height is accounted for by the regression line with x = arm span. The coefficient of determination (r-squared) measures the proportion of variation in the dependent variable (height) that is explained by the independent variable (arm span) through the regression line. An r-squared value of 0.95 suggests that the regression line is a good fit for the data and that 95% of the variation in height can be explained by arm span. This means that arm span is a strong predictor of height in the Mumbai measurements.
To learn more about regression line, click here:
brainly.com/question/29753986
#SPJ11
