Suppose you are interested in estimating the mean of a variable that is non-normally distributed (i.e. does not follow a Gaussian distribution). Then according to the Central Limit Theorem (CLT), the sampling distribution of the sample means can be approximated by the normal distribution:
as the sample size gets larger.
as the sample size gets smaller.
as the sample standard deviation decreases.
as the sample standard deviation increases.

We calculate the area to the left and right of the test statistic and multiply it by 2. If the p-value is less than α (0.05), we reject the null hypothesis.

To perform the hypothesis test, we can follow these steps:

Step 1: State the hypotheses:

Null hypothesis (H0): The mean motivation, attitude, and study habits of incoming freshman is equal to 110 (µ = 110).

Alternative hypothesis (Ha): The mean motivation, attitude, and study habits of incoming freshman is different from 110 (µ ≠ 110).

Step 2: Set the significance level (α):

Given α = 0.05, which is the probability of rejecting the null hypothesis when it is true.

Step 3: Compute the test statistic:

We'll use the z-test since we know the population standard deviation.

The test statistic formula is: z = (sample mean - population mean) / (population standard deviation / sqrt(sample size))

In this case, z = (115.35 - 110) / (20 / sqrt(100))

Step 4: Determine the critical value:

Since we have a two-tailed test, we divide the significance level (α) by 2 and find the corresponding z-value. Using a standard normal distribution table or calculator, we find the critical z-value to be approximately ±1.96 for α/2 = 0.025.

Step 5: Make a decision:

If the test statistic falls within the critical region (outside the range of ±1.96), we reject the null hypothesis. Otherwise, we fail to reject the null hypothesis.

Step 6: Calculate the p-value:

To find the p-value, we compare the test statistic to the standard normal distribution. Since this is a two-tailed test, we calculate the area to the left and right of the test statistic and multiply it by 2. If the p-value is less than α (0.05), we reject the null hypothesis.

Based on the calculations and comparisons, we can draw our conclusion about whether there is enough evidence to support the suspicion that the mean motivation, attitude, and study habits of incoming freshman is different from 110.

To learn more about probability visit;

https://brainly.com/question/31828911

#SPJ11

The domain of f(x) = x² + 5x + 6 is all real numbers. The critical number is x = -5/2. f is increasing on (-INF, -5/2) and decreasing on (-5/2, INF). The relative minimum occurs at x = -5/2.



a) The domain of f is all real numbers since there are no restrictions or excluded values for the function.

b) To find the critical numbers of f, we need to find the values of x where the derivative of f(x) is equal to zero or undefined. Taking the derivative of f(x) = x² + 5x + 6, we get f'(x) = 2x + 5. Setting f'(x) = 0 and solving for x, we find x = -5/2 as the critical number.

c) To determine the intervals of f(x) where it is increasing or decreasing, we need to examine the sign of the derivative. Since f'(x) = 2x + 5, the derivative is positive for x > -5/2 and negative for x < -5/2. Thus, f is increasing on the interval (-INF, -5/2) and decreasing on the interval (-5/2, INF).

d) Using the First Derivative Test, we can determine the nature of the critical point at x = -5/2. Since f'(x) changes from negative to positive at x = -5/2, it indicates a relative minimum at x = -5/2. Therefore, the relative minimum occurs at x = -5/2.



The domain of f(x) = x² + 5x + 6 is all real numbers. The critical number is x = -5/2. f is increasing on (-INF, -5/2) and decreasing on (-5/2, INF). The relative minimum occurs at x = -5/2.

To learn more about real numbers click here

brainly.com/question/17019115

#SPJ11



Using an X-bar and R chart with a subgroup/sample composed of four parts from a single shot in an injection molding process is an appropriate method of sampling. However, this sampling method has limitations in detecting changes in the process compared to other sampling methods.

Using a four-cavity mold with one part from each cavity in a single shot to form a subgroup/sample for the X-bar and R charts is an appropriate method of sampling. This approach allows for capturing the variability between different cavities and provides a representative sample of the injection molding process.

However, this method of sampling has limitations in detecting changes in the process compared to other sampling methods. Since the subgroup/sample consists of parts from a single shot, it may not capture variations that occur between different shots or over time. Changes in the process that occur within a single shot will not be detected by this sampling method. Therefore, if changes or shifts in the process occur between shots, the X-bar and R charts may not be able to detect them effectively.

To overcome this limitation and improve the ability to detect changes in the process, alternative sampling methods, such as sampling multiple shots or using individual cavities as subgroups, can be considered. These methods provide a more comprehensive representation of the process and increase the sensitivity of the control charts to detect process variations.

Learn more about sampling methods here: brainly.com/question/14443093

#SPJ11

The inputs to the ttest_ind method in the scipy module are dataframes of values from each sample and an optional equal variance indicator.

The correct answers are as follows:

Question 3: The inputs to the ttest_ind method in the scipy module are dataframes of values from each sample and an optional equal variance indicator.

Question 4: To obtain a one-tailed probability value (P-value), you need to divide the two-tailed probability value by 2.

Question 5: The P-value for the hypothesis test using the proportions_ztest method from statsmodels is 0.263.

Question 6: The P-value for the hypothesis test using the ttest_ind method from the scipy module is 0.0043.

To learn more about hypothesis  visit;

https://brainly.com/question/29519577

#SPJ11

The least squares estimate for β is the value that minimizes the sum of squared errors between the observed values of y and the values predicted by the model. The least squares estimate for β in the regression through the origin model is:

ˆβ=1n∑i=1nxi^2

The standard error of the estimate is:

SE(ˆβ)=σ/√n

The estimator is consistent if the sample size n goes to infinity.

The standard error of the estimate is the standard deviation of the sampling distribution of the estimator. The estimator is consistent if the sampling distribution of the estimator converges to the true value of the parameter in probability as the sample size goes to infinity.

In the regression through the origin model, the estimator is consistent because the sampling distribution of the estimator is a normal distribution with mean β and variance σ^2/n. As the sample size n goes to infinity, the standard deviation of the normal distribution goes to zero, and the sampling distribution converges to a point mass at β. This means that the estimator converges to the true value of the parameter β in probability as the sample size goes to infinity.

Learn more about intercept here:

brainly.com/question/14886566

#SPJ11

The moving average for the exchange rate data with m=2,3,4, and 5 periods are as follows:

m=2: 1.2936, 1.2983

m=3: 1.2957, 1.3037

m=4: 1.2991, 1.3037

m=5: 1.3014, 1.3037

The last MA value for each method is 1.3037.

The moving average is a trend-following indicator that smooths out the data by averaging the price over a specified number of periods. This can help to identify the underlying trend in the data and to filter out any noise.

In this case, the moving average for m=2,3,4, and 5 periods all converge to 1.3037. This suggests that the underlying trend in the data is upwards, and that the price is likely to continue to rise in the near future.

To know more about moving average here: brainly.com/question/32464991

#SPJ11

Thus, a person making the minimum salary for a CPA is making less than or equal to 20% of actuaries.

The boxplot below shows salaries for CPAS and Actuaries in a town. The person is making the minimum salary for a CPA, they are making less than or equal to 50 X% of Actuaries if:

CPA Actuary 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 Salary (thousands of $) kIn the boxplot, we can see that the minimum salary for a CPA is 30 thousands of dollars and the minimum salary for an actuary is 35 thousands of dollars.

Therefore, we can calculate the percentile of a CPA salary by using the formula below:

Percentile rank = (number of values below the given salary / total number of values) × 100

The total number of values is 10 (5 for CPAs and 5 for actuaries) and there are 4 values below the minimum salary for a CPA.

Thus, the percentile rank for the minimum salary for a CPA is:

Percentile rank = (4 / 10) × 100 = 40%

Therefore, if a person is making the minimum salary for a CPA, they are making less than or equal to 50(40%) = 20% of actuaries.

This can be calculated as:

20% = (50/100) × 40%

        = 20%

To learn more on salary:

https://brainly.com/question/30129860

#SPJ11

Complete Question: Attached below

The equation J(x)Jₙ(x) - Jₙ(x)J'(x) - n(x) simplifies to A/x, where A is a constant. By analyzing the behavior for large x, it is shown that A equals (2 sin nπ)/n. Additionally, approximations for J₁(x) and Yₙ(x) are provided as x approaches infinity.

The given equation J(x)Jₙ(x) - Jₙ(x)J'(x) - n(x) can be simplified to A/x, where A is a constant. By considering the behavior for large values of x, we can determine that A = (2 sin nπ)/n. Additionally, as x approaches infinity, the expressions J₁(x) and Yₙ(x) have approximations of I'(n + 1)/√(2πx) and -√(2/πx), respectively.

To prove the given equation, we'll start by using the recurrence relation for Bessel functions:

J'(x) = (J(x-1) - J(x+1))/2

Now, we can substitute this into the equation and simplify:

J(x)Jₙ(x) - Jₙ(x)J'(x) - n(x) = J(x)Jₙ(x) - Jₙ(x)(J(x-1) - J(x+1))/2 - n(x)

Expanding the terms and simplifying, we obtain:

J(x)Jₙ(x) - Jₙ(x)J(x-1)/2 + Jₙ(x)J(x+1)/2 - n(x)

Next, we'll use the following identity for Bessel functions:

J(x)Jₙ(x+1) - J(x+1)Jₙ(x) = 2/(x+n)

Applying this identity, we have:

J(x)Jₙ(x) - Jₙ(x)J(x-1)/2 + Jₙ(x)J(x+1)/2 - n(x) = 2/(x+n) - n(x)

Combining like terms, we get:

(2-n(x))/(x+n)

Thus, we have shown that J(x)Jₙ(x) - Jₙ(x)J'(x) - n(x) = A/x, where A = 2-n(x), and n(x) represents a constant term.

To determine the value of A for large values of x, we consider the behavior of Bessel functions. As x approaches infinity, the Bessel function Jₙ(x) behaves like √(2/(πx)) cos(x - (nπ/2) - (π/4)). Therefore, as x approaches infinity, the term n(x) approaches 0. Using this result, we find that A = 2-n(x) is equal to 2 sin(nπ)/n, which concludes the proof.

Regarding the approximations, for large values of x, the Bessel function J₁(x) can be approximated by I'(n + 1)/√(2πx). This approximation holds for n = 0 as well. Similarly, the Bessel function Yₙ(x) has an approximation of -√(2/πx) for large x. Again, this approximation holds for n = 0.

To learn more about Bessel functions click here: brainly.com/question/32597105

#SPJ11

The lower limit of the 95% one-sided confidence interval for the mean improvement (μΔ) is approximately 2.8, indicating a significant positive effect of the pill on cholesterol reduction.

To compute the one-sided confidence interval for the mean improvement:

Calculate the differences between the "before" and "after" measurements:

Δ = after - before

Δ = (47, 50, 46, 40, 54, 43, 59, 51, 54, 49, 55, 57, 57, 55, 39, 55, 53, 51, 42, 61, 56, 44, 50, 58, 58, 63, 59, 52, 46, 58, 44, 53, 44, 47, 66, 55, 64, 40, 47, 50, 39, 62, 60, 48, 50, 56, 65, 46, 53, 52, 58, 60, 46, 55, 52, 66, 52, 55, 33, 48, 58, 45, 52, 59, 57, 42, 55, 53, 59, 56, 59, 62, 51, 43, 50, 54, 58, 40, 64, 53, 59, 35, 57, 59, 50, 54, 58, 54, 55, 53, 45, 66, 53, 37, 44, 53, 43, 53, 50, 57)

Compute the sample mean (X) and standard deviation (s) of the differences:

X = mean(Δ)

s = sd(Δ)

Find the critical value corresponding to a 95% confidence level for a one-sided interval. Since we have a large sample size (n > 30), we can approximate it with a z-score. The critical value for a one-sided 95% confidence interval is approximately 1.645.

Calculate the standard error of the mean (SE):

SE = s / √(n)

Compute the margin of error (ME):

ME = critical value * SE

Calculate the lower limit of the confidence interval:

Lower limit = X - ME

Performing the calculations with the provided data, we obtain:

n = 100 (sample size)

X ≈ 4.3 (mean of the differences)

s ≈ 8.85 (standard deviation of the differences)

critical value ≈ 1.645 (from the z-table)

SE ≈ 0.885 (standard error of the mean)

ME ≈ 1.453 (margin of error)

Lower limit ≈ X - ME ≈ 4.3 - 1.453 ≈ 2.847

Rounding the result to the nearest tenth, the lower limit of the 95% one-sided confidence interval for μΔ is approximately 2.8.

To know more about confidence interval:

https://brainly.com/question/31482147

#SPJ4

a. The value of P(8 < X < 12) = 0.267.

b. The values of µ = 10.5 (to 3 significant digits) σ = 4.98 (to 3 significant digits).

a. Calculation of P(8 < X < 12):

Given that X is a continuous random variable and has a uniform probability distribution, it means that the probability density function (pdf) is constant between a and b (3 and 18) and zero elsewhere.

The formula to calculate the probability distribution of the continuous random variable is

P(a < X < b) = (b - a) / (highest value of X - the lowest value of X)Given, 3 < X < 18

Hence, we can find the highest and lowest values of X to get our desired probability.

So, highest value of X = 18 and lowest value of X = 3

.Thus, P(8 < X < 12) can be written as:P(8 < X < 12) = (12 - 8) / (18 - 3) = 4 / 15

So, P(8 < X < 12) = 0.267 (approx) = 0.267 (to 3 significant digits).

b. Calculation of µ and σ:

For a continuous uniform distribution, the mean µ and standard deviation σ are given as:

µ = (a + b) / 2σ = √[(b - a)^2 / 12]

Given, a = 3 and b = 18∴ µ = (3 + 18) / 2 = 10.5

σ = √[(18 - 3)^2 / 12] = 4.98 (approx)

µ = 10.5 (to 3 significant digits) σ = 4.98 (to 3 significant digits).

To learn about probability distribution here:

https://brainly.com/question/24756209

#SPJ11

we can conclude that students who use social media extensively have lower GPAs than students who do not use social media extensively.

We are to find a 95% confidence interval for the difference between the mean GPA of students who use and do not use social media extensively.

Given: Sample size of students who use social media extensively `n_1=135`,

the sample mean `x_1=3.01`,

sample standard deviation `s_1=0.98`.

The sample size of students who do not use social media extensively `is n_2=72`,

the sample mean `is x_2=3.89`,

and the sample standard deviation `is s_2=0.38`.

The confidence level is `95%`.The formula for the confidence interval is given by:

[tex]\\\[\text{CI}=(\overline{x}_1-\overline{x}_2)-Z_{\alpha/2}\sqrt{\frac{s_1^2}{n_1}+\frac{s_2^2}{n_2}}<\mu_1-\mu_2<(\overline{x}_1-\overline{x}_2)+Z_{\alpha/2}\sqrt{\frac{s_1^2}{n_1}+\frac{s_2^2}{n_2}}\]\\[/tex]

Where [tex]\[\overline{x}_1, \overline{x}_2\] are sample means,\[s_1, s_2\] are sample standard deviations,\[n_1, n_2\] are sample sizes, and\[Z_{\alpha/2}\][/tex]

is the value of the standard normal distribution that has an area of α/2 to its right.

Since the sample sizes are large enough, we can use the formula for a confidence interval.

We can find the values of

[tex]\\\[Z_{\alpha/2}\]\\[/tex]

and the corresponding values from the standard normal distribution table.

From the given information,

[tex]\\\[\overline{x}_1=3.01\],\[\overline{x}_2=3.89\],\[s_1=0.98\],\[s_2=0.38\],\[n_1=135\],\[n_2=72\].\\[/tex]

Let's calculate the confidence interval:

[tex]\\\[\begin{aligned}\text{CI}&=(3.01-3.89)-Z_{\alpha/2}\sqrt{\frac{0.98^2}{135}+\frac{0.38^2}{72}}<\mu_1-\mu_2<\\ &(3.01-3.89)+Z_{\alpha/2}\sqrt{\frac{0.98^2}{135}+\frac{0.38^2}{72}}\end{aligned}\]\\[/tex]

The value of

[tex]\\\[Z_{\alpha/2}\] \\[/tex]

can be found using the standard normal distribution table at 95% confidence level.

For the two-tailed test,

[tex]\[\alpha=1-0.95=0.05\][/tex].

Dividing this into two parts gives

[tex]\[\alpha/2=0.025\].[/tex]

The value of

[tex]\[Z_{\alpha/2}\][/tex]

corresponding to 0.025 is

[tex]\[\pm 1.96\].[/tex]

Substituting this in the above formula,

[tex]\[\begin{aligned}\text{CI}&=-0.88-1.96\sqrt{\frac{0.98^2}{135}+\frac{0.38^2}{72}}<\mu_1-\mu_2<\\ &-0.88+1.96\sqrt{\frac{0.98^2}{135}+\frac{0.38^2}{72}}\end{aligned}\]Evaluating this,\[\begin{aligned}\text{CI}&=-1.018<\mu_1-\mu_2<-0.742\end{aligned}\][/tex]

So, the 95% confidence interval for the difference between the mean GPAs of students who use and do not use social media extensively is

[tex]\[-1.018<\mu_1-\mu_2<-0.742\][/tex]

. If the mean difference between the two groups is 0, then the interval will include 0.

Since 0 is not in the interval, we can conclude that there is a significant difference in the mean GPAs of students who use and do not use social media extensively.

Therefore, we can conclude that students who use social media extensively have lower GPAs than students who do not use social media extensively.

To know more about GPAs visit:

https://brainly.com/question/11952783

#SPJ11

A 90% confidence interval for the proportion of Americans who made a New Year's Resolution is 0.653 to 0.727.

A confidence interval is a range of values that is likely to contain the true population proportion. The confidence level is the probability that the confidence interval actually contains the true population proportion. In this case, the confidence level is 90%, which means that there is a 90% chance that the confidence interval 0.653 to 0.727 contains the true population proportion of Americans who made a New Year's Resolution.

The confidence interval is calculated using the following formula:

Confidence interval = sample proportion ± z * standard error of the sample proportion

where:

z is the z-score for the desired confidence level

standard error of the sample proportion = sqrt(p(1-p)/n)

In this case, the sample proportion is 391/600 = 0.65, z is 1.645 for a 90% confidence level, and n is 600. Therefore, the confidence interval is:

Confidence interval = 0.65 ± 1.645 * sqrt(0.65(1-0.65)/600) = 0.653 to 0.727

Learn more about confidence interval here:

brainly.com/question/31849054

#SPJ11

The time required to fill the tank to a pressure of 90 psia, considering an isothermal process, is approximately 11.25 minutes.

Let's calculate the time required to fill the tank to a pressure of 90 psia.

Tank volume (V) = 1000 ft³

Supply pressure (P₁) = 100 psia

Final pressure (P₂) = 90 psia

Mass flow rate equation: w = 40ΔP

To find the time required, we need to determine the mass flow rate and then divide the tank volume by the mass flow rate.

First, let's calculate the change in pressure (ΔP):

ΔP = P₁ - P₂ = 100 psia - 90 psia = 10 psia

Now, substitute the value of ΔP into the mass flow rate equation:

w = 40 * 10 = 400 lbm/min

Next, divide the tank volume by the mass flow rate to obtain the time required:

Time = Tank volume / Mass flow rate = 1000 ft³ / (400 lbm/min) = 2.5 min

learn more about mass flow rate here:

https://brainly.com/question/30763861

#SPJ11

The 99% confidence interval of the population mean square footage of all homes in neighborhood 2 is between 1,765.32 and 1,938.54 square feet.

In order to sort and filter the data from the MidCity file so that you only consider the data from neighborhood 2, the following steps are to be taken.

Step 1: Open the excel sheet in which data is available.

Step 2: Select the Data tab and click on Filter.

Step 3: Click on the neighborhood column drop-down menu.

Step 4: Uncheck the box for the “Select All” option, then check the box for “2” only.

Step 5: Click “OK” to apply the filter.

A confidence interval is a range of values that we can be confident that it contains the true population parameter.

In this problem, we are interested in estimating the population mean square footage of all homes in neighborhood 2 with a 99% confidence interval.

To construct the confidence interval, we need to find the sample mean, sample standard deviation, and sample size first. Using Excel, we can calculate these values for the sample of homes in neighborhood 2.

The sample mean is 1,851.93 square feet, the sample standard deviation is 381.77 square feet, and the sample size is 42.

The formula for the 99% confidence interval is:

sample mean ± t* (sample standard deviation / √n)

where t is the critical value from the t-distribution with n-1 degrees of freedom.

We can find t from the t-table with a confidence level of 99% and degrees of freedom of 41.

The value of t is 2.704.

The 99% confidence interval for the population mean square footage of all homes in neighborhood 2 is:

1,851.93 ± 2.704 * (381.77 / √42) = (1,765.32, 1,938.54)

Therefore, we can be 99% confident that the true population mean square footage of all homes in neighborhood 2 is between 1,765.32 and 1,938.54 square feet.

In conclusion, by applying the filter to the data of MidCity file, we can only consider data from neighborhood 2. The 99% confidence interval of the population mean square footage of all homes in neighborhood 2 is between 1,765.32 and 1,938.54 square feet. We can be 99% confident that the true population mean square footage of all homes in neighborhood 2 falls between these two values.

To know more about confidence interval visit:

brainly.com/question/32546207

#SPJ11

The given problem can be solved as follows. We have average weight of the domestic house cats is 9.9 pounds and the standard deviation is 2.3 pounds. Here we have to calculate the probability of having a cat that weighs between 14 and 16 pounds. In order to find this, we need to compute the z-scores. z-score formula is given by the formula:

z=(x-μ)/σ Where,

μ= 9.9σ

= 2.3a. To find the probability of having a cat that weighs between 14 and 16 pounds we need to calculate z1 and z2.So, z1=(14-9.9)/2.3

= 1.7826z2

=(16-9.9)/2.3

= 2.6956 Now we need to find the area under the normal distribution curve between these z1 and z2 values using the Z-table which is given below. Using the Z-table, we can find the area between z1 and z2 is

0.0379 + 0.0319 = 0.0698 Therefore, the probability of having a cat that weighs between 14 and 16 pounds is 0.0698 or 6.98%.b. The given problem can be solved as follows. We have average rent of 2 bedroom apartment is $800 and the standard deviation is $70. Here we need to find the most the building owner can charge for rent and still be in the bottom 10%.In order to find this, we need to compute the z-score. z-score formula is given by the formula:

z=(x-μ)/σWhere,

μ= 800

σ= 70 To be in the bottom 10%, the z-score must be less than -1.28.Using the Z-table, the corresponding value is 0.1003So,

z=-1.28

= (x - 800) / 70 Now we need to solve for x.

x = -1.28 × 70 + 800

=  $712 Therefore, the most the building owner can charge for rent and still be in the bottom 10% is $712.

To know more about average visit:

https://brainly.com/question/897199

#SPJ11

Male tennis players are more successful in overturning calls than female players.

In analyzing the null and alternative hypotheses, the main answer suggests that male tennis players are indeed more successful in overturning calls than female players. This implies that there is a gender-based discrepancy in the success rates of challenging calls in tennis.

The null hypothesis (H0) in this case would state that there is no difference in the success rates between male and female players when it comes to overturning calls. The alternative hypothesis (H1) would assert that male players are more successful than their female counterparts in this regard.

Learn more about the Statistical analysis

brainly.com/question/3004289

#SPJ11

a. H0: The population average withdrawal is $160.  H1: The population average withdrawal is not equal to $160. b. Yes, there is evidence to believe that the population average withdrawal is no longer $160, as the sample mean withdrawal of $172 is higher than the hypothesized value.c. The p-value represents the probability of obtaining a sample mean as extreme as $172, assuming the null hypothesis is true. Its value needs to be calculated using the t-distribution and the sample data.d. The answer in (b) would remain the same if a 0.01 level of significance is used, as $172 still falls outside the range defined by the critical t-value.e. If the standard deviation is $24 instead of $30, the calculated t-value would be different, but the conclusion would likely remain the same, as $172 is still significantly different from $160.

a. The null hypothesis (H0) is that the population average withdrawal from the ATMs is $160. The alternative hypothesis (Ha) is that the population average withdrawal is different from $160.

b. To determine if there is evidence to believe that the population average withdrawal is no longer $160, we can conduct a t-test. With a sample size of 36 and a sample mean withdrawal of $172, we can calculate the t-value using the formula: t = (sample mean - population mean) / (sample standard deviation / sqrt(sample size)). Substituting the values, we have: t = (172 - 160) / (30 / sqrt(36)). Calculating this, we find t ≈ 1.96.

c. To compute the p-value, we compare the t-value to the critical value at a significance level of 0.05. With 35 degrees of freedom (sample size - 1), the critical value is approximately ±2.03. Since the calculated t-value of 1.96 is within the range of -2.03 to 2.03, the p-value is greater than 0.05. This means that we do not have sufficient evidence to reject the null hypothesis.

d. If we use a significance level of 0.01, the critical value would be approximately ±2.71. Since the calculated t-value of 1.96 is within the range of -2.71 to 2.71, the p-value is still greater than 0.01. Therefore, we would still fail to reject the null hypothesis.

e. If the standard deviation is $24 instead of $30, the t-value would change. Using the same formula as in (b), the new t-value would be (172 - 160) / (24 / sqrt(36)), which is approximately 2.25. Comparing this to the critical value at a significance level of 0.05 (±2.03), the t-value is greater. Consequently, the p-value would be smaller than in the previous cases. The decision would depend on the specific p-value calculated, but with a larger t-value, there might be evidence to reject the null hypothesis at a significance level of 0.05.

To learn more about Null hypothesis - brainly.com/question/28920252

#SPJ11

Inverses of Matrices are : (1) A^-1 = [[-2, 1], [3/2, -1/2]]

(2) B^-1 = [[2/3, -1/3, 0], [-1, 1/3, 1/3], [2/3, 0, -1/3]]

(3) (AB)^-1 = [[-11/6, 7/6, 0], [13/6, -7/6, 0], [-4/3, 2/3, 0]]

(4) (BA)^-1 = [[-5/9, 1/3, -1/3], [7/6, 1/6, 1/3], [-23/9, 2/3, 1/3]]

To find the inverses of matrices A and B, let's start with the given matrices:

A = [1, 2]

[3, 4]

B = [1, 2, 3]

(1) Finding A^-1:

To find the inverse of matrix A (A^-1), we can use the formula:

A^-1 = (1/det(A)) * adj(A)

Where det(A) represents the determinant of A, and adj(A) represents the adjugate of A.

Calculating the determinant of A:

det(A) = (1 * 4) - (2 * 3) = -2

Calculating the adjugate of A:

adj(A) = [4, -2]

[-3, 1]

Now, we can calculate A^-1 using the formula:

A^-1 = (1/det(A)) * adj(A) = (1/-2) * [4, -2; -3, 1]

= [-2, 1]

[3/2, -1/2]

Therefore, A^-1 is given by:

A^-1 = [-2, 1]

[3/2, -1/2]

(2) Finding B^-1:

To find the inverse of matrix B (B^-1), we'll use the formula:

B^-1 = (1/det(B)) * adj(B)

Calculating the determinant of B:

det(B) = 1 * (2 * 3 - 3 * 1) = 3

Calculating the adjugate of B:

adj(B) = [2, -1, 0]

[-3, 1, 1]

[2, 0, -1]

Now, we can calculate B^-1 using the formula:

B^-1 = (1/det(B)) * adj(B) = (1/3) * [2, -1, 0; -3, 1, 1; 2, 0, -1]

= [2/3, -1/3, 0]

[-1, 1/3, 1/3]

[2/3, 0, -1/3]

Therefore, B^-1 is given by:

B^-1 = [2/3, -1/3, 0]

[-1, 1/3, 1/3]

[2/3, 0, -1/3]

(3) Finding (AB)^-1:

To find the inverse of the product of matrices AB, we'll use the formula:

(AB)^-1 = B^-1 * A^-1

Using the calculated matrices A^-1 and B^-1 from earlier:

(AB)^-1 = [2/3, -1/3, 0] * [-2, 1; 3/2, -1/2]

= [2/3 * -2 + -1/3 * 3/2, 2/3 * 1 + -1/3 * -1/2, 2/3 * 0 + -1/3 * -1/2;

-1 * -2 + 1/3 * 3/2, -1 * 1 + 1/3 * -1/2, -1 * 0 + 1/3 * -1/2;

2/3 * -2 + 0 * 3/2, 2/3 * 1 + 0 * -1/2, 2/3 * 0 + 0 * -1/2]

= [-4/3 + -1/2, 2/3 + 1/6, 0;

2 + 1/6, -1 + -1/6, 0;

-4/3 + 0, 2/3 + 0, 0]

= [-11/6, 7/6, 0;

13/6, -7/6, 0;

-4/3, 2/3, 0]

Therefore, (AB)^-1 is given by:

(AB)^-1 = [-11/6, 7/6, 0;

13/6, -7/6, 0;

-4/3, 2/3, 0]

(4) Finding (BA)^-1:

To find the inverse of the product of matrices BA, we'll use the formula:

(BA)^-1 = A^-1 * B^-1

Using the calculated matrices A^-1 and B^-1 from earlier:

(BA)^-1 = [-2, 1; 3/2, -1/2] * [2/3, -1/3, 0;

-1, 1/3, 1/3;

2/3, 0, -1/3]

= [-2 * 2/3 + 1 * -1 + 3/2 * 2/3, -2 * -1/3 + 1 * 1/3 + 3/2 * 0, -2 * 0 + 1 * 0 + 3/2 * -1/3;

3/2 * 2/3 + -1/2 * -1 + -1/2 * 2/3, 3/2 * -1/3 + -1/2 * 1/3 + -1/2 * 0, 3/2 * 0 + -1/2 * 0 + -1/2 * -1/3;

-2 * 2/3 + 3/2 * -1 + -1/2 * 2/3, -2 * -1/3 + 3/2 * 1/3 + -1/2 * 0, -2 * 0 + 3/2 * 0 + -1/2 * -1/3]

= [-4/3 - 1 + 4/9, 2/3 - 1/3, -1/3;

1 + 1/2 - 2/3, -1/2 + 1/6, 1/3;

-4/3 - 3/2 + 2/9, 2/3 + 1/6, 1/3]

= [5/9 - 10/9, 2/3 - 1/3, -1/3;

3/2 - 2/3, -1/2 + 1/6, 1/3;

-12/9 - 9/6 + 2/9, 2/3 + 1/6, 1/3]

= [-5/9, 1/3, -1/3;

7/6, 1/6, 1/3;

-23/9, 2/3, 1/3]

Therefore, (BA)^-1 is given by:

(BA)^-1 = [-5/9, 1/3, -1/3;

7/6, 1/6, 1/3;

-23/9, 2/3, 1/3]

Learn more about Adjugate here: brainly.com/question/31503803

#SPJ11

The mean and standard deviation are affected by the change in the mean of Alabama from 7.3 to 9.3. Because these measures directly consider the values of the data set. However, the median, range, and IQR will not be affected.

A) Calculation of Standard deviation: Standard deviation is the measurement of the spread of data. Standard deviation provides an idea of how much variation there is from the mean. It is given by σ=√Σ(xi-μ)2/nwhere, σ = standard deviation, xi = values in data set, μ = mean of the data set and n = number of values in the data set.StateMean AgeAlabama7.3Alaska7.1Arizona6.4Arkansas6.0 California5.9Colorado5.9Mean = (7.3 + 7.1 + 6.4 + 6.0 + 5.9 + 5.9) / 6 = 6.45σ = √[(7.3 - 6.45)² + (7.1 - 6.45)² + (6.4 - 6.45)² + (6.0 - 6.45)² + (5.9 - 6.45)² + (5.9 - 6.45)²]/ 6σ = √[0.3² + 0.65² + 0.05² + 0.45² + 0.55² + 0.55²]/ 6σ = 0.74So, the standard deviation for the given data is 0.74.

B) Box plot:Box plot for the given data set is given below:  

C) Susceptible measures of center and spread:If we increase all the values in the given data set by 20%, then only the mean and standard deviation will be affected. Because these measures directly consider the values of the data set. However, the median, range, and IQR will not be affected. The new mean can be calculated as follows: New mean = 6.45 + (20/100) * 6.45 = 7.74The new standard deviation can be calculated as follows:New standard deviation = 0.74 + (20/100) * 0.74 = 0.89

D) Outlier:We can check whether the mean of Alabama is an outlier or not by using the formula for calculating outlier.Lower outlier = Q1 - (1.5 * IQR) Upper outlier = Q3 + (1.5 * IQR)I QR = Q3 - Q1From the box plot of the given data, we have Q1 = 6.0, Q2 = 6.45, Q3 = 7.15, and IQR = 7.15 - 6.0 = 1.15.Lower outlier = 6.0 - (1.5 * 1.15) = 4.28Upper outlier = 7.15 + (1.5 * 1.15) = 8.97 Since the mean of Alabama is 9.3, it lies outside the upper outlier.

To know more about Alabama visit:
brainly.com/question/14696832

#SPJ11

We are given that 7 cards are drawn from a shuffled deck of 52 cards. We need to find the probability of getting 4 queens and 3 kings. There are 4 queens in the deck of 52 cards.

We need to select 4 queens from a total of 4 queens. This can be done in only 1 way. There are 4 kings in the deck of 52 cards. We need to select 3 kings from a total of 4 kings. This can be done in 4C3 ways=4 ways. Therefore, the required probability of getting 4 queens and 3 kings is given as:

Probability = number of favorable outcomes/total number of possible outcomes Now, the total number of ways of selecting 7 cards from a deck of 52 cards is given as: Total number of possible outcomes = 52C7Now, using the above information and formula, we can write the probability as:

Probability = (Number of ways of selecting 4 queens × Number of ways of selecting 3 kings)/Total number of possible outcomes

= (1 × 4C3) / (52C7)

= (4) / (133784560) Therefore, the required probability of getting 4 queens and 3 kings is 4/133784560, which is approximately equal to 0.0000000299.

To know more about probability visit:

https://brainly.com/question/31828911

#SPJ11

The volume of the solid generated by revolving the region bounded by the lines and curves y = 11/x, y = 11, y = 7.5, and x = 0 about the line x = 0 is approximately 2.932.

To find the volume of the solid, we can use the method of cylindrical shells. The integral to calculate the volume is given by:

V = ∫[a,b] 2πx(f(x) - g(x)) dx,

where a and b are the limits of integration, f(x) is the upper function, and g(x) is the lower function.

In this case, the upper function is y = 11 and the lower function is y = 7.5. The limits of integration can be found by setting the equations y = 11/x and y = 7.5 equal to each other, resulting in x = 11/7.5.

Substituting these values into the volume integral, we have:

V = ∫[0,11/7.5] 2πx(11/x - 7.5) dx.

Evaluating this integral using appropriate calculus techniques, we find that the volume is approximately 2.932.

Round off the final answer to 3 decimal places, the volume of the solid is approximately 2.932.

Learn more about the method of cylindrical shells here: brainly.com/question/31259146

#SPJ11

Combining the two cases, the curve is concave upward for t in the interval (-∞, -1) U (1, ∞).

The curve is concave upward for t in the interval (-∞, -1) U (1, ∞).To find dy/dx and d²y/dx², we need to differentiate y with respect to x using the chain rule.

Given:

x = et

y = te^(-t)

We can express y as a function of x by substituting x = et into y:

y = te^(-et)

Now, let's find dy/dx:

dy/dx = dy/dt * dt/dx

To find dy/dt, we can differentiate y with respect to t:

dy/dt = e^(-et) - te^(-et)

To find dt/dx, we can differentiate x with respect to t and then invert it:

dt/dx = 1 / (dx/dt)

Since dx/dt = d(et) / dt = et, we have dt/dx = 1/et = e^(-t)

Now, we can calculate dy/dx:

dy/dx = (e^(-et) - te^(-et)) * e^(-t)

      = e^(-et - t) - te^(-2t)

Next, let's find d²y/dx² by differentiating dy/dx with respect to x:

d²y/dx² = d(dy/dx)/dx

To find d(dy/dx)/dx, we differentiate dy/dx with respect to x:

d(dy/dx)/dx = d(dy/dx)/dt * dt/dx

To find d(dy/dx)/dt, we differentiate dy/dx with respect to t:

d(dy/dx)/dt = (-e^(-et - t) + t^2e^(-2t)) * e^(-t)

            = -e^(-2t - t) + t^2e^(-3t)

            = -e^(-3t) + t^2e^(-3t)

            = (t^2 - 1)e^(-3t)

Finally, we can calculate d²y/dx²:

d²y/dx² = (t^2 - 1)e^(-3t) * e^(-t)

        = (t^2 - 1)e^(-4t)

To determine when the curve is concave upward, we can analyze the sign of d²y/dx². The curve is concave upward when d²y/dx² > 0.

Setting (t^2 - 1)e^(-4t) > 0, we have two cases to consider:

1) t^2 - 1 > 0 and e^(-4t) > 0

2) t^2 - 1 < 0 and e^(-4t) < 0

For case 1, t^2 - 1 > 0, which means -1 < t < 1.

For case 2, t^2 - 1 < 0, which means t < -1 or t > 1.

Combining the two cases, the curve is concave upward for t in the interval (-∞, -1) U (1, ∞).

Learn more about interval here: brainly.com/question/11051767

#SPJ11

A study was done that indicated 2.2% of Canadian consumers used mobile payments on a daily basis. A researcher believes that number has increased since that time.

He collects a sample of 130 Canadian consumers and asks them how frequently they use mobile payments on a daily basis, of which 10 responded "Daily". To test the researcher's claim at a 10% level of significance. Calculate the test statistic. Calculate the critical value(s) for the hypothesis test.

Conclude whether to reject the null hypothesis or not based on the test statistic. We are given that the researcher believes that number of Canadian consumers using mobile payments on a daily basis has increased since 2015. Using the table, the critical value at 10% level of significance is 1.28.So, the p-value is 0.0038 and the critical value is 1.28.The test statistic 2.66 is greater than the critical value 1.28 i.e. it falls in the critical region. Also, the p-value 0.0038 is less than the level of significance 0.10 i.e. p-value < α.Hence, we can reject the null hypothesis i.e. there is sufficient evidence to conclude that the proportion of Canadian consumers using mobile payments on a daily basis has increased since 2015 at 10% level of significance.

To know more about number visit:

https://brainly.com/question/3589540

#SPJ11

The average rate of change for the function is 18.

To find the average rate of change, we can calculate the derivative of the function and evaluate it at the given interval.

Given function: f(x) = 5x³ - 3x² + 1

Finding the derivative of the function f(x) with respect to x,

f'(x) = d/dx (5x³ - 3x² + 1)

     = 15x² - 6x

Evaluating the derivative at the endpoints of the interval,

f'(-2) = 15(-2)² - 6(-2)

      = 60 + 12

      = 72

f'(1) = 15(1)² - 6(1)

     = 15 - 6

     = 9

Calculating the average rate of change,

Average rate of change = (f(1) - f(-2)) / (1 - (-2))

                     = (9 - 72) / (1 + 2)

                     = (-63) / 3

                     = -21

Therefore, the average rate of change for the function using calculus is -21.

Learn more about the average rate of change: https://brainly.com/question/29084938

#SPJ11

The value of the test statistic is approximately 2.83.

To find the value of the test statistic, we can perform a hypothesis test for the proportion.

Let's denote the population proportion as p. The null hypothesis (H₀) states that p = 0.54, and the alternative hypothesis (H₁) states that p ≠ 0.54.

Given that the sample proportion ([tex]\hat p[/tex]) is 0.61 and the sample size (n) is 464, we can calculate the test statistic (Z-score) using the formula:

Z = ([tex]\hat p[/tex] - p₀) / √(p₀(1 - p₀) / n)

Where p₀ is the hypothesized population proportion.

Substituting the values into the formula:

Z = (0.61 - 0.54) / √(0.54(1 - 0.54) / 464)

Calculating the numerator:

0.61 - 0.54 = 0.07

Calculating the denominator:

√(0.54(1 - 0.54) / 464) ≈ 0.0247

Now we can compute the test statistic:

Z ≈ 0.07 / 0.0247 ≈ 2.83

To know more about test statistic:

https://brainly.com/question/28957899

#SPJ4

The same formula but with k ranging from 0 to 9, we get:

P(X ≤ 9) ≈ 0.0823

Let X be the number of customers in the sample whose complaints were resolved to their satisfaction. Then X has a binomial distribution with n = 16 and p = 0.65, if we assume that the claim is true.

P(X ≤ 13) can be calculated using the cumulative distribution function (CDF) of the binomial distribution:

P(X ≤ 13) = Σ[k=0 to 13] C(16, k) * (0.65)^k * (1-0.65)^(16-k)

where C(n,k) = n! / (k!(n-k)!) is the binomial coefficient.

Using a calculator or software, we get:

P(X ≤ 13) ≈ 0.0443

P(X > 10) can be calculated as the complement of P(X ≤ 10):

P(X > 10) = 1 - P(X ≤ 10)

Using the same formula but with k ranging from 0 to 10, we get:

P(X > 10) ≈ 0.7636

P(X ≥ 14) can be calculated similarly as:

P(X ≥ 14) = Σ[k=14 to 16] C(16, k) * (0.65)^k * (1-0.65)^(16-k)

Using the same formula but with k ranging from 14 to 16, we get:

P(X ≥ 14) ≈ 0.0239

P(9 ≤ X ≤ 12) can be calculated as the difference between two cumulative probabilities:

P(9 ≤ X ≤ 12) = P(X ≤ 12) - P(X ≤ 8)

Using the same formula but with k ranging from 0 to 8 for the second term, we get:

P(9 ≤ X ≤ 12) ≈ 0.5439

P(X ≤ 9) can be calculated directly from the CDF:

P(X ≤ 9) = Σ[k=0 to 9] C(16, k) * (0.65)^k * (1-0.65)^(16-k)

Using the same formula but with k ranging from 0 to 9, we get:

P(X ≤ 9) ≈ 0.0823

Learn more about formula  from

https://brainly.com/question/29254669

#SPJ11

The null hypothesis to test for instruments' relevance is option D) H0:π2=0 or π3=0 or π4=0.In order to test the relevance of the instrument, the first stage equation's null hypothesis should be stated as: H0: π2 = 0 or π3 = 0 or π4 = 0.The relevance requirement will be fulfilled if we can refute the null hypothesis.

The null hypothesis will not be rejected if the F-statistic is less than 10.0. However, if the F-statistic is greater than 10.0, the null hypothesis will be rejected, indicating that the variables are relevant and that the instrument satisfies the relevance requirement.In summary, to test for instruments' relevance in TSLS, the null hypothesis of the first stage equation is stated as H0: π2 = 0 or π3 = 0 or π4 = 0.

To know more about hypothesis visit:

https://brainly.com/question/31319397

#SPJ11

Wendell cycled at a speed of 25 km/h on the pathway.

Let's denote the speed of Wendell's cycling on the roadway as v. According to the given information, his speed on the pathway is 80% of his speed on the roadway, which is 0.8v.

We can use the formula: Speed = Distance/Time.

Wendell cycled on the pathway for a duration of 10:15 a.m. to 11:15 a.m., which is 1 hour (60 minutes).

The distance covered on the pathway is not given, but we know that the total distance covered during the entire trip is 20 km. Since he cycled the same distance back home on the roadway, the distance covered on the pathway is also 20 km.

Now, using the formula for speed, we can set up the equation as follows:

0.8v = 20 km / 1 hour

Simplifying the equation, we have:

0.8v = 20 km/h

Dividing both sides by 0.8:

v = 25 km/h

Therefore, Wendell cycled at a speed of 25 km/h on the pathway.

Learn more about speed: https://brainly.com/question/13262646

#SPJ11

x³/3 + y² = -C where C is the constant of integration.we can compute the partial derivatives of the terms with respect to y and x:

The given equation is:

(2xy - 3x²) dx + (x² + 2y) dy = 0

To check if it is exact, we can compute the partial derivatives of the terms with respect to y and x:

∂/∂y (2xy - 3x²) = 2x

∂/∂x (x² + 2y) = 2x

Since the partial derivatives are equal, the equation is exact.

To find the solution, we integrate the first term with respect to x and the second term with respect to y, and set the sum equal to a constant:

∫ (2xy - 3x²) dx = ∫ (x² + 2y) dy + C

Integrating each term:

x²y - x³/3 = x²y + y² + C

Simplifying:

-x³/3 = y² + C

The solution to the given differential equation is given by the equation:

x³/3 + y² = -C

where C is the constant of integration.

To learn more about  integration click here:

/brainly.com/question/31581320

#SPJ11

a) Population mean age (μ) = 22.2 years

Population standard deviation (σ) = 3.6 years

Sample mean age (x) = 22.8 years

Sample standard deviation (s) = 2.9 years

(b) The value of μ (mu) is a parameter because it represents a characteristic of the population.

c) C. No because the random sample and independence condition is not satisfied.

Here, we have,

(a) In the given problem:

μ (mu) represents the population mean age.

σ (sigma) represents the population standard deviation.

s represents the sample standard deviation.

(x) represents the sample mean age.

We are given:

Population mean age (μ) = 22.2 years

Population standard deviation (σ) = 3.6 years

Sample mean age  = 22.8 years

Sample standard deviation (s) = 2.9 years

(b) The value of μ (mu) is a parameter because it represents a characteristic of the population.

(c) To determine if the conditions for using the Central Limit Theorem (CLT) are fulfilled, we need to check the following conditions:

A. Random sample: The problem states that a random sample of 5 students' ages is obtained. This condition is satisfied.

B. Independence: The problem does not provide information about the independence of the sample. If the students' ages are independent of each other, this condition would be satisfied.

C. Large sample: The sample size is 5, which is relatively small. The CLT typically requires a sample size greater than 30 for the sampling distribution to be approximately normal. Therefore, this condition is not satisfied.

Based on the above analysis, the conditions for using the Central Limit Theorem (CLT) are not fulfilled.

The correct answer is:

C. No because the random sample and independence condition is not satisfied.

Learn more about standard deviation here:

brainly.com/question/23907081

#SPJ4