The accelerationfunction (in m/s 2
) and the initial velocity are given for a particle m oving along a line. Find (a) the velocity at tim e t and (b) the total distance traveled during the given tim e interval. Show all work. Write your final answer rounded to hundredths. a(t)=2t+3,v(0)=−4,0≤t≤3

The function does not represent a discrete probability distribution function since it does not meet the two necessary conditions

The function can only represent a discrete probability distribution function if it meets the following conditions:

Each of the probabilities associated with each event is between 0 and 1, inclusive.

The sum of all probabilities is 1.

The probabilities of all events are mutually exclusive.

In this context, the given function f(x) = 1/x, can only represent a discrete probability distribution function for values of x greater than or equal to 2, because, for x = 1, the probability is equal to 1, which violates the first condition.

Besides, the function does not meet the second condition since the sum of all the probabilities for the values greater than or equal to 2 diverges.

Therefore, the function does not represent a discrete probability distribution function since it does not meet the two necessary conditions.

Learn more about Probability:

https://brainly.com/question/32963989

#SPJ11

The function that would make K an unbiased estimator for σ2 is K' = (n/n - 1)K.

a) We are given the Gamma distribution of K, that is, K ∼ Γ(α = n - 1, β = nσ2). Now, we have to compute the bias of K, i.e., B(K) = E(K) - σ2.Using the moments of Gamma distribution, we have,E(K) = α/β = (n - 1)/nσ2Now, B(K) = E(K) - σ2= (n - 1)/nσ2 - σ2= (n - 1 - nσ4)/nσ2b) To make K an unbiased estimator for σ2, we have to find a function of K that results in the expected value of K being equal to σ2. That is, E(K') = σ2.To find the required function, let K' = cK, where c is some constant. Then,E(K') = E(cK) = cE(K) = c(n - 1)/nσ2We want E(K') to be equal to σ2. So, we must have,c(n - 1)/nσ2 = σ2Solving for c, we get:c = n/n - 1Therefore, the function that would make K an unbiased estimator for σ2 is K' = (n/n - 1)K.

Learn more about Gamma distribution here,

The value of the given triple integral is ln(3)/2 - 1.

To evaluate the given triple integral, let's calculate it step by step.

[tex]\[\int_1^{\ln(3)} \int_1^z \int_{\ln(4y)}^{\ln(5y)} e^{x+y^2-z} \, dx \, dy \, dz\][/tex]

First, let's integrate with respect to x:

[tex]\[\int_1^{\ln(3)} \int_1^z \left(e^{x+y^2-z}\right)\Bigg|_{\ln(4y)}^{\ln(5y)} \, dy \, dz\][/tex]

Simplifying the limits of integration, we have:

[tex]\[\int_1^{\ln(3)} \int_1^z \left(e^{\ln(5y)+y^2-z} - e^{\ln(4y)+y^2-z}\right) \, dy \, dz\][/tex]

Using the properties of logarithms, we can simplify the exponentials:

[tex]\[\int_1^{\ln(3)} \int_1^z \left(5ye^{y^2-z} - 4ye^{y^2-z}\right) \, dy \, dz\][/tex]

Next, let's integrate with respect to y:

[tex]\[\int_1^{\ln(3)} \left(\frac{5}{2}e^{y^2-z} - \frac{4}{2} e^{y^2-z}\right)\Bigg|_1^z \, dz\][/tex]

Simplifying the limits of integration, we have:

[tex]\[\int_1^{\ln(3)} \left(\frac{5}{2}e^{z-z} - \frac{4}{2} e^{z-z}\right) \, dz\][/tex]

The exponents cancel out:

[tex]\[\int_1^{\ln(3)} \left(\frac{5}{2} - \frac{4}{2}\right) \, dz\][/tex]

Simplifying further:

[tex]\[\int_1^{\ln(3)} \frac{1}{2} \, dz\][/tex]

Integrating with respect to z:

[tex]\[\left[\frac{z}{2}\right]_1^{\ln(3)}\][/tex]

Substituting the limits of integration:

[tex]\[\left[\frac{\ln(3)}{2} - \frac{1}{2}\right] - \left[\frac{1}{2}\right]\][/tex]

Simplifying:

ln(3)/2 - 1/2 - 1/2

Final result:

ln(3)/2 - 1

As a result, the specified triple integral has a value of ln(3)/2 - 1.

Learn more about integral

https://brainly.com/question/30286960

#SPJ11

The revenue function is given by R(x) = x p(x) dollars where x is the number of units sold and p(x) is the unit price. If p(x) = 41(4), then the revenue if 10 units are sold is 1640 dollars.

The given revenue function is given by:

R(x) = x p(x) dollars where x is the number of units sold and p(x) is the unit price and p(x) = 41(4).

To find the revenue if 10 units are sold, substitute the value of x = 10 in the revenue function.

R(x) = x p(x) dollars

Given, p(x) = 41(4)p(10) = 41(4) = 164

Substitute p(10) and x = 10 in the revenue function,

R(x) = x p(x) dollars

R(10) = 10 × 164 = 1640 dollars

Therefore, the revenue if 10 units are sold is 1640 dollars.

To learn more about revenue function:https://brainly.com/question/19755858

#SPJ11

In hypothesis testing, there is not sufficient evidence to reject the claim μ<3.8.

In hypothesis testing, the null hypothesis (H0) is the statement that is assumed to be true unless there is strong evidence to suggest otherwise. In this case, the null hypothesis would be that the mean number of hours students study at the university (per day) is not less than 3.8 hours (μ >= 3.8). The alternative hypothesis (Ha) is the claim being made by the dean, stating that the mean is less than 3.8 hours (μ < 3.8).

To assess the validity of the dean's claim, a hypothesis test is performed. The test typically involves collecting a sample of data and calculating a test statistic. In this scenario, the test statistic would be a t-score or z-score, depending on the sample size and whether the population standard deviation is known.

After calculating the test statistic, it is compared to a critical value or p-value to make a decision. If the decision fails to reject the null hypothesis, it means that there is not sufficient evidence to suggest that the mean number of hours students study is less than 3.8 hours.

Based on the decision to fail to reject the null hypothesis, we cannot support the claim made by the dean that the mean number of hours students study at the university (per day) is less than 3.8 hours. However, it's important to note that failing to reject the null hypothesis does not prove that the claim is false. It simply means that the evidence in the sample is not strong enough to support the claim. Further research or a larger sample size may be necessary to draw more conclusive results.

To know more about hypothesis, visit

https://brainly.com/question/29576929

#SPJ11

There are no angles in the range 0≤θ<2π for which the cosine is equal to 2. The cosine function takes values between -1 and 1. Since the range of the cosine function is limited, there are no angles for which the cosine is equal to 2.

The equation cos(θ) = 2 has no real solutions, since the cosine function oscillates between -1 and 1 as θ varies. Therefore, it is not possible to find angles within the range 0≤θ<2π where the cosine is equal to 2.

If we expand our scope to include complex numbers, we can find values of θ for which the cosine is equal to 2. In the complex plane, the cosine function can take on values greater than 1 or less than -1. Using Euler's formula, we have cos(θ) = (e^(iθ) + e^(-iθ))/2. By setting this expression equal to 2, we can solve for the complex values of θ.

However, in the context of the given range 0≤θ<2π, there are no angles that satisfy the condition cos(θ) = 2. The cosine function is limited to values between -1 and 1 within this range.

Therefore, considering only real values of θ within the range 0≤θ<2π, there are no angles for which the cosine is equal to 2.

Learn more about cosine here:

brainly.com/question/11070103

#SPJ11

Given that the standard deviation of Lake A is 5°F.

We are to find out the number of days a researcher would need to observe to estimate the true mean of the temperature of Lake A within an error of 3°F and 99% confidence.

Let's determine the answer of this problem:

Step 1: Determine the critical valueThe critical value of 99% confidence is 2.576.

Step 2: Determine the margin of error is given by: Margin of error = Critical value *[tex]Standard deviation/sqrt (sample size)3 = 2.576 * 5 / sqrt (sample size)Sqrt (sample size) = 2.576 * 5 / 3Sqrt (sample size) = 4.293Sample size = (4.293)^2Sample size ≈ 18.41≈ 19[/tex]

Therefore, the number of days a researcher would need to observe to estimate the true mean of the temperature of Lake A within an error of 3°F and 99% confidence is 19.

Answer: \boxed{19}.

To know more about the word margin  visits :

https://brainly.com/question/18143830

#SPJ11

a) The difference in number of pigs in one year is 4.8 pigs per year.

b) There is difference of 995,904lbs sell in one year.

c) There is difference of $86.40/year in gross income.

d) The difference in gross income is $39,426.72 per year.

a. The difference in number of pigs in one year is 2 pigs per litter and 2 pigs multiplied by 2.4 litters/year is equal to 4.8 pigs per year.

b. The difference in pounds to sell in one year is:

Live weight: Two pigs weigh 40 lbs more than ten pigs i.e., two pigs weigh 80 lbs. Thus, the difference between 12 pigs and 10 pigs is 80 pounds.

Therefore, 80 × 2.4 × 1,000 = 192,000 pounds per year.

Carcass weight: Average market weight per pig is 280lbs and the dress is 74%.

Then, 74% of 280 is 207.2lbs (cwt). 207.2lbs × 2 pigs = 414.4lbs

difference = 414.4lbs × 2.4 litters/year × 1,000 sows = 995,904lbs per year.

c. The difference in gross income is: $87.00/cwt

carcass weight = $87.00/cwt × 207.2lbs = $18.00 per pig × 4.8 pigs = $86.40/year.

d. If you have 1,000 sows, the difference in gross income will be: 995,904lbs × $87.00/cwt ÷ 100 = $866,562.72 per year.

Thus, the difference in gross income is $866,562.72 - $827,136 = $39,426.72 per year.

Learn more about weight

https://brainly.com/question/30822405

#SPJ11

the probability that at least 370 voted in their most recent local election is approximately 0.9636.

To find the probability that at least 370 voted in their most recent local election, find P(X ≥ 370). The normal approximation to the binomial distribution with parameters p and n is

P(X≥r)=1-Φ(r-µ/σ)P(X≥370)

=1-Φ(369.5-375/√93.75)P(X≥370)

=1-Φ(-5.5/3.063)P(X≥370)

=1-Φ(-1.795)

By standard normal distribution table,

Φ(-1.795) = 0.0364

Therefore, P(X≥370) = 1 - 0.0364= 0.9636

Hence, the probability that at least 370 voted in their most recent local election is approximately 0.9636.

To learn more about probability,

https://brainly.com/question/13604758

#SPJ11

the probability that one bill for veterinary services costs between $55 and $103 is approximately 0.7699, which corresponds to option (d).

The probability that one bill for veterinary services costs between $55 and $103 can be calculated by finding the area under the Normal distribution curve within this range.

To solve this, we need to standardize the values using the z-score formula: z = (x - μ) / σ, where x is the given value, μ is the mean, and σ is the standard deviation.

For $55:

z1 = (55 - 79) / 20 = -1.2

For $103:

z2 = (103 - 79) / 20 = 1.2

We then look up the corresponding probabilities associated with these z-scores in the standard Normal distribution table.

Using the table, we find that the probability for z1 is 0.1151, and the probability for z2 is 0.8849.

To find the probability between these two values, we subtract the smaller probability from the larger probability:

P(55 < x < 103) = 0.8849 - 0.1151 = 0.7699

Learn more about probability here : brainly.com/question/31828911

#SPJ11

P(Z < 1.32) ≈ 0.9066

P(Z < 3.0) = 1

P(Z > 1.45) ≈ 0.0735

P(Z > 2.15) ≈ 0.0158

P(-2.34 < Z < 1.76) ≈ 0.9222

To determine the probabilities for the standard normal random variable Z, we can use a standard normal distribution table or a calculator.

P(Z < 1.32):

P(Z < 1.32) represents the probability of observing a value less than 1.32 on the standard normal distribution curve. By looking up the value 1.32 in the standard normal distribution table or using a calculator, we find that the corresponding probability is approximately 0.9066.

P(Z < 3.0):

P(Z < 3.0) represents the probability of observing a value less than 3.0 on the standard normal distribution curve. The standard normal distribution extends to positive infinity, and the area to the left of any positive value is equal to 1. Therefore, P(Z < 3.0) is equal to 1.

P(Z > 1.45):

P(Z > 1.45) represents the probability of observing a value greater than 1.45 on the standard normal distribution curve. By symmetry, this is equal to the probability of observing a value less than -1.45. Using the standard normal distribution table or a calculator, we find that the probability is approximately 0.0735.

P(Z > 2.15):

P(Z > 2.15) represents the probability of observing a value greater than 2.15 on the standard normal distribution curve. By looking up the value 2.15 in the standard normal distribution table or using a calculator, we find that the probability is approximately 0.0158.

P(-2.34 < Z < 1.76):

P(-2.34 < Z < 1.76) represents the probability of observing a value between -2.34 and 1.76 on the standard normal distribution curve. By subtracting the area to the left of -2.34 from the area to the left of 1.76, we can find this probability. Using the standard normal distribution table or a calculator, we find that the probability is approximately 0.9222.

In summary:

P(Z < 1.32) ≈ 0.9066

P(Z < 3.0) = 1

P(Z > 1.45) ≈ 0.0735

P(Z > 2.15) ≈ 0.0158

P(-2.34 < Z < 1.76) ≈ 0.9222

Know more about Probabilities here :

https://brainly.com/question/29381779

#SPJ11

(i) The double angle identities for sine and cosine are used to express sin(2x) and cos(2x) in terms of sin(x) and cos(x).

(b) The equation sin(2x) - tan(x) = tan(x)cos(2x) is not universally true for all values of x.

(c)Solving sin(2x) - tan(x) = 0 yields solutions of x = 0°, x = 60°, x = 180°, and x = 300° in the interval 0° ≤ x < 360°.

(i) To express sin(2x) in terms of sin(x) and cos(x), we can use the double angle identity for sine:

sin(2x) = 2sin(x)cos(x)

(ii) To express cos(2x) in terms of cos(x), we can use the double angle identity for cosine:

cos(2x) = cos^2(x) - sin^2(x)

(b) To show that sin(2x) - tan(x) = tan(x)cos(2x) for all values of x, we can start by substituting the expressions for sin(2x) and cos(2x) from part (i) and (ii):

sin(2x) - tan(x) = 2sin(x)cos(x) - tan(x)

Now, let's rewrite tan(x) in terms of sin(x) and cos(x):

tan(x) = sin(x)/cos(x)

Substituting this back into the equation:

sin(2x) - tan(x) = 2sin(x)cos(x) - sin(x)/cos(x)

Multiplying through by cos(x) to eliminate the denominator:

cos(x) * (sin(2x) - tan(x)) = 2sin(x)cos^2(x) - sin(x)

Using the identity cos^2(x) = 1 - sin^2(x):

cos(x) * (sin(2x) - tan(x)) = 2sin(x)(1 - sin^2(x)) - sin(x)

Expanding and simplifying:

cos(x) * (sin(2x) - tan(x)) = 2sin(x) - 2sin^3(x) - sin(x)

cos(x) * (sin(2x) - tan(x)) = sin(x) - 2sin^3(x)

Now, let's simplify the right side of the equation using the identity sin^2(x) = 1 - cos^2(x):

cos(x) * (sin(2x) - tan(x)) = sin(x) - 2sin^3(x)

cos(x) * (sin(2x) - tan(x)) = sin(x) - 2(1 - cos^2(x))^3

Expanding and simplifying:

cos(x) * (sin(2x) - tan(x)) = sin(x) - 2(1 - 3cos^2(x) + 3cos^4(x) - cos^6(x))

cos(x) * (sin(2x) - tan(x)) = sin(x) - 2 + 6cos^2(x) - 6cos^4(x) + 2cos^6(x)

Now, we can express the right side in terms of tan(x) and cos(2x):

cos(x) * (sin(2x) - tan(x)) = sin(x) - 2 + 6(1 - sin^2(x)) - 6(1 - sin^2(x))^2 + 2(1 - sin^2(x))^3

Expanding and simplifying:

cos(x) * (sin(2x) - tan(x)) = sin(x) - 2 + 6 - 6sin^2(x) - 6 + 6sin^2(x) - 6sin^4(x) + 2 - 6sin^2(x) + 3sin^4(x) - 3sin^6(x)

Combining like terms:

cos(x) * (sin(2x) - tan(x)) = -3sin^6(x) + 3sin^4(x) - 3sin^2(x) + 6

Notice that the right side does not simplify to tan(x) * cos(2x). Therefore, the equation sin(2x) - tan(x) = tan(x) * cos(2x) is not true for all values of x.

(c) To solve the equation sin(2x) - tan(x) = 0, we can rearrange the equation as follows:

sin(2x) - tan(x) = 0

2sin(x)cos(x) - sin(x)/cos(x) = 0

Combining the terms with a common denominator:

(2sin(x)cos(x) - sin(x))/cos(x) = 0

Multiplying through by cos(x):

2sin(x)cos(x) - sin(x) = 0

Factoring out sin(x):

sin(x)(2cos(x) - 1) = 0

This equation is satisfied when either sin(x) = 0 or 2cos(x) - 1 = 0.

For sin(x) = 0, we have x = 0° and x = 180°.

For 2cos(x) - 1 = 0, we have cos(x) = 1/2, which gives us x = 60° and x = 300°.

Therefore, the solutions in degrees in the interval 0° ≤ x < 360° are x = 0°, x = 60°, x = 180°, and x = 300°.

To learn more about cosine  Click Here: brainly.com/question/29114352

#SPJ11

The article states that 1 in 200 people carry the defective gene for colon cancer. We want to find the approximate proportion of all groups of size 1000 that have at least 2 people with the defective gene.

Let's consider the probability of an individual not carrying the defective gene, which is given by 1 - 1/200 = 199/200. The probability of an individual carrying the defective gene is 1/200.

To find the proportion of groups with at least 2 people carrying the defective gene, we can use the binomial distribution. Let X be the number of people in a group of size 1000 who carry the gene. We want to calculate P(X ≥ 2).

Using the binomial distribution formula, we can calculate this probability as follows:

P(X ≥ 2) = 1 - P(X = 0) - P(X = 1)

P(X = 0) = (199/200)^1000

P(X = 1) = 1000 * (1/200) * (199/200)^999

Substituting these values into the equation, we can find the approximate proportion of groups having at least 2 people with the defective gene.

It's important to note that we are assuming independence among individuals and that the population size is large enough for the binomial distribution to be an appropriate approximation.

By calculating the probabilities and subtracting them from 1, we can determine the approximate proportion of all groups of size 1000 that have at least 2 people with the defective gene.

Learn more about binomial here:

https://brainly.com/question/30339327

#SPJ11

The expression as a simplified power series in x is:[tex]\((5+x^2)y'' + xy' + 2y\)=\(\sum_{n=0}^{\infty} [(2n^2 + 6n + 4) \cdot a_{n+2} + (n+1) \cdot a_{n+1} + 2a_n] \cdot x^n\)[/tex]

To express the given expression [tex]\((5+x^2)y'' + xy' + 2y\)[/tex] as a power series in x on the open interval I containing the origin, we need to differentiate and manipulate the power series representation of y.

Given that \(y = \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} a_n x^n\) on \(I\), let's first find the derivatives of \(y\) with respect to \(x\).

The first derivative is:

[tex]\[y' = \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} a_n \cdot n \cdot x^{n-1} = \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} a_{n+1} \cdot (n+1) \cdot x^n\][/tex]

The second derivative is:

[tex]\[y'' = \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} a_{n+1} \cdot (n+1) \cdot n \cdot x^{n-1} = \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} a_{n+2} \cdot (n+2) \cdot (n+1) \cdot x^n\][/tex]

Now, let's substitute these derivatives into the given expression:

[tex]\((5+x^2)y'' + xy' + 2y = (5+x^2)\left(\sum_{n=0}^{\infty} a_{n+2} \cdot (n+2) \cdot (n+1) \cdot x^n\right) + x\left(\sum_{n=0}^{\infty} a_{n+1} \cdot (n+1) \cdot x^n\right) + 2\left(\sum_{n=0}^{\infty} a_n x^n\right)\)[/tex]

Expanding and rearranging the terms, we have:

[tex]\((5+x^2)y'' + xy' + 2y = \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} a_{n+2} \cdot (n+2) \cdot (n+1) \cdot x^n + \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} a_{n+2} \cdot (n+2) \cdot (n+1) \cdot x^{n+2} + \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} a_{n+1} \cdot (n+1) \cdot x^{n+1} + 2\sum_{n=0}^{\infty} a_n x^n\)[/tex]

Notice that the terms in each sum have the same power of x, but different coefficients. To express this as a single power series, we can combine the terms with the same power of x.

Let's rewrite the sums by adjusting the indices:

[tex]\((5+x^2)y'' + xy' + 2y = \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} (n+2)(n+1) \cdot a_{n+2} \cdot x^n + \sum_{n=2}^{\infty} (n+2)(n+1) \cdot a_{n+2} \cdot x^{n} + \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} (n+1) \cdot a_{n+1} \cdot x^{n} + 2\sum_{n=0}^{\infty} a_n x^n\)[/tex]

Now, we can combine the terms with the same power of x:

[tex]\((5+x^2)y'' + xy' + 2y = \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} [(n+2)(n+1) \cdot a_{n+2} + (n+2)(n+1) \cdot a_{n+2} + (n+1) \cdot a_{n+1} + 2a_n] \cdot x^n\)[/tex]

Simplifying the coefficients, we have:

[tex]\((5+x^2)y'' + xy' + 2y = \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} [(2n^2 + 6n + 4) \cdot a_{n+2} + (n+1) \cdot a_{n+1} + 2a_n] \cdot x^n\)[/tex]

Therefore, the expression [tex]\((5+x^2)y'' + xy' + 2y\)[/tex] can be expressed as the power series:

[tex]\(\sum_{n=0}^{\infty} [(2n^2 + 6n + 4) \cdot a_{n+2} + (n+1) \cdot a_{n+1} + 2a_n] \cdot x^n\)[/tex]

To know more about Derivative refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/32931796#

#SPJ11

1. The expected number is 2/3. (2) The probability is 4/7. (3) The expected amount of money (in PLN) the players will spend on the game can be calculated as 7 PLN.

1. To find the expected number of obtained black balls, we can consider the probability of drawing a black ball on each round until a green ball is drawn. Since there are 2 black balls out of a total of 7 balls, the probability of drawing a black ball in each round is 2/7. Since the draws are made with replacement and independently, the expected number of obtained black balls is equal to the probability of drawing a black ball on each round, which is 2/7.

2. The probability that Adam will win the reward in the shooting game can be calculated using a geometric distribution. The probability that Adam wins on the first round is the probability that he hits, which is 1/4. The probability that Bob wins on the first round is the probability that Adam misses (3/4) multiplied by the probability that Bob hits (1/3). In subsequent rounds, the probabilities adjust accordingly. By summing the probabilities of Adam winning on each round, we find that the probability of Adam winning the reward is 4/7.

3. To calculate the expected amount of money spent on the game, we can multiply the probability of each round by the cost of each round (1 PLN) and sum them up. Since the game ends when one of the players wins, the number of rounds played follows a geometric distribution. The expected amount of money spent can be calculated by multiplying the probability of each round by the cost of each round and summing them up. In this case, since the game ends when one of the players hits, the expected amount of money spent is 7 PLN.


To learn more about probability click here: brainly.com/question/32117953

#SPJ11

The critical number of the function f(x) = x² - 512x is x = 256, and it leads to a local minimum.

To find the critical numbers of the function f(x) = x² - 512x, we need to find the values of x where the derivative of the function equals zero or is undefined.

First, let's find the derivative of f(x):

f'(x) = 2x - 512

Next, we set the derivative equal to zero and solve for x:

2x - 512 = 0

2x = 512

x = 256

So, the critical number is x = 256.

To determine whether this critical number leads to a local maximum or minimum, we can use the second-derivative test. The second derivative of f(x) is the derivative of f'(x):

f''(x) = 2

Since the second derivative is a constant (2), we can directly evaluate it at the critical number x = 256.

f''(256) = 2

Since the second derivative is positive (2 > 0), this means that the function has a concave-up shape at x = 256. According to the second-derivative test, this indicates a local minimum at x = 256.

Learn more about function here:

https://brainly.com/question/30721594

#SPJ11

The Type I Error in this scenario would be falsely concluding that the drug is better than the placebo when there is actually no difference between them.

In hypothesis testing, a Type I Error refers to the incorrect rejection of a null hypothesis when it is actually true. In the context of comparing a new drug to a control (placebo) in a statistical test, the null hypothesis would typically be that there is no difference between the drug and the placebo (no effect of the drug).

Now, let's analyze the options you provided:

1. Concluding that the control (placebo) is more effective than the drug: This would not be a Type I Error. It could be a correct conclusion if the data supports it or a Type II Error if the conclusion is incorrect (e.g., due to insufficient statistical power).

2. Falsely concluding that the drug is better than the placebo: This is the definition of a Type I Error. It means incorrectly rejecting the null hypothesis that there is no difference between the drug and the placebo, and concluding that the drug is better.

3. Falsely concluding there is an effect: This option is vague, as it does not specify whether it refers to an effect of the drug or an effect in general. If it refers to falsely concluding that there is an effect of the drug when there isn't, then it would be a Type I Error.

4. Correctly concluding that the drug is better than the placebo: This would not be a Type I Error if the conclusion is supported by the data.

5. Falsely concluding that the drug is not better than the placebo (falsely concluding there is no effect): This would be a Type II Error, not a Type I Error. A Type II Error occurs when the null hypothesis is not rejected, despite it being false.

6. Correctly concluding that the drug is not better than the placebo (there is no effect): This would not be a Type I Error if the conclusion is supported by the data.

Learn more about hypothesis here:

https://brainly.com/question/29576929

#SPJ11

The exact value of sin(2π/3) using the properties of common angles and trigonometric identities is √3/2 as a fraction.

To find the exact value of sin(2π/3) without a calculator, we can rely on the properties of common angles and trigonometric identities.

First, we note that 2π/3 corresponds to an angle of 120 degrees or 2π/3 radians. This angle lies in the second quadrant of the unit circle.

In the second quadrant, the sine function is positive. Therefore, sin(2π/3) is positive.

To determine the exact value as a fraction, we can consider a right triangle where the opposite side has a length of √3 and the hypotenuse has a length of 2 (since it is a unit circle). By the Pythagorean theorem, the adjacent side has a length of 1.

Using the definition of sine as opposite/hypotenuse, we have:

sin(2π/3) = √3/2

Therefore, the exact value of sin(2π/3) as a fraction is √3/2.

To learn about trigonometric identities visit:

https://brainly.com/question/3785172

#SPJ11+

The length of a caliper can vary depending on the type and brand of the caliper, as well as the size of the object being measured.

The length of a caliper is the distance between the tips of the two arms when they are closed together.

A caliper is a useful tool for taking precise measurements. It is used to take accurate measurements of the distance between two points on an object. A caliper consists of two arms that are connected together by a joint.

The arms can be opened and closed to measure the distance between two points. The length of the caliper is the distance between the tips of the two arms when they are closed together.

To measure the length of a caliper, first, make sure the caliper is clean and free of debris. Next, close the arms of the caliper together so that the tips of the two arms are touching each other. Then, measure the distance between the tips of the two arms using a ruler or another measuring device.

The length of a caliper can vary depending on the type and brand of the caliper. For example, a digital caliper may have a different length than a dial caliper. Additionally, the length of a caliper can also vary depending on the size of the object being measured.

In conclusion, the length of a caliper is the distance between the tips of the two arms when they are closed together.

To measure the length of a caliper, close the arms of the caliper together so that the tips of the two arms are touching each other and then measure the distance between the tips of the two arms using a ruler or another measuring device.

For more such questions on length of a caliper

https://brainly.com/question/30041909

#SPJ8

The task is to use the chi-square goodness-of-fit test to determine whether the observed distribution of a variable differs from a given distribution.

The observed frequencies and the given distribution are provided, along with a significance level of 0.10. We need to compute the test statistic and identify the critical value to make a decision about the null hypothesis. The chi-square goodness-of-fit test is used to compare observed frequencies with expected frequencies based on a given distribution. In this case, we are given the observed frequencies and the given distribution: 0.2, 0.1, 0.2, 0.2, 0.3.

To calculate the chi-square test statistic, we need to follow these steps:

1. Calculate the expected frequencies based on the given distribution and the total sample size. In this case, the total sample size is 9 + 8 + 6 + 15 + 12 = 50. Multiplying each probability from the given distribution by the total sample size, we get the expected frequencies: 0.2 * 50 = 10, 0.1 * 50 = 5, 0.2 * 50 = 10, 0.2 * 50 = 10, 0.3 * 50 = 15.

2. Calculate the chi-square test statistic using the formula:

χ^2 = Σ[(Observed Frequency - Expected Frequency)^2 / Expected Frequency]

Plugging in the observed and expected frequencies, we get:

χ^2 = [(9-10)^2/10] + [(8-5)^2/5] + [(6-10)^2/10] + [(15-10)^2/10] + [(12-15)^2/15]

Calculating the values inside the parentheses and summing them up, we find the test statistic χ^2 = 1.6.

To identify the critical value for the chi-square distribution, we need the degrees of freedom. In this case, since there are 5 categories and we have already estimated one parameter (the probability of the last category based on the others), the degrees of freedom would be 5 - 1 = 4. Looking up the critical value in the chi-square distribution table with 4 degrees of freedom and a significance level of 0.10, we find the critical value to be approximately 7.779.

Comparing the test statistic (χ^2 = 1.6) to the critical value (7.779), we can see that the test statistic is less than the critical value. Therefore, we fail to reject the null hypothesis. This means that the data does not provide sufficient evidence to conclude that the observed distribution differs significantly from the given distribution.

The value of the test statistic is 1.6, and the critical value is approximately 7.779. Therefore, the answer is option B: No, because there is not sufficient evidence to reject the null hypothesis.

Learn more about chi-square here:- brainly.com/question/32595988

#SPJ11

Only statements 1 and 2 must be true.

Based on the given information, the following statements must be true:

AP = CP (the diagonals of a parallelogram bisect each other)

BC = AD (opposite sides of a parallelogram are equal in length)

The following statements cannot be determined from the given information:

∠BPC = ∠APD or ∠BPC + ∠APD = 180 degrees (angle relationships between intersecting lines cannot be determined without additional information)

∠CAD - ∠ACB (angle relationships between non-adjacent angles of a parallelogram cannot be determined without additional information)

m_ABC = 90 (the opposite angles of a parallelogram are equal, but they do not necessarily add up to 90 degrees)

Therefore, only statements 1 and 2 must be true.

Learn more about   statement  from

https://brainly.com/question/27839142

#SPJ11

Solution further: -2sin^2(phi)cos(phi) - 2sin(phi)cos(3phi) = 0. The solutions will be the intersection of the solutions for each term.

To find all solutions to the equation cos(5phi) - cos(phi) = sin(3phi) on the interval 0 <= phi < pi, we can break down the solution into two steps.

Step 1: Use trigonometric identities to simplify the equation.

Start by applying the angle addition formula for cosine: cos(A + B) = cos(A)cos(B) - sin(A)sin(B).

Rewrite the equation as: cos(4phi + phi) - cos(phi) = sin(3phi).

Apply the angle addition formula: [cos(4phi)cos(phi) - sin(4phi)sin(phi)] - cos(phi) = sin(3phi).

Simplify further: cos(4phi)cos(phi) - sin(4phi)sin(phi) - cos(phi) = sin(3phi).

Step 2: Use double-angle formulas and trigonometric identities to simplify the equation and find the solutions.

Apply the double-angle formula for cosine: cos(2phi) = 2cos^2(phi) - 1.

Substitute this into the equation: [2cos^2(2phi) - 1]cos(phi) - sin(4phi)sin(phi) - cos(phi) = sin(3phi).

Rearrange the terms and simplify: 2cos^3(phi) - cos(phi) - sin(4phi)sin(phi) - cos(phi) + sin(3phi) = 0.

Factor out cos(phi): cos(phi)(2cos^2(phi) - 2) - [sin(4phi)sin(phi) - sin(3phi)] = 0.

Apply trigonometric identities: cos(phi)(2(1 - sin^2(phi)) - 2) - [2sin(phi)cos(3phi)] = 0.

Simplify further: -2sin^2(phi)cos(phi) - 2sin(phi)cos(3phi) = 0.

From here, you can solve the equation by considering each term separately and finding the values of phi that satisfy each term individually. The solutions will be the intersection of the solutions for each term.

To learn more about trigonometric identities click here:

brainly.com/question/24377281

#SPJ11

(a) Approximately 0.3085 or 30.85% of rods have a length less than 23.9 cm.(b) Approximately 0.0574 or 5.74% of rods will be discarded.(c) The plant manager should expect to discard approximately 287 rods (rounded to the nearest integer).(d) The plant manager should expect to manufacture approximately 9426 rods (rounded up to the nearest integer).

(a) To find the proportion of rods with a length less than 23.9 cm, we can use the standard normal distribution and calculate the z-score.

z = (x - μ) / σ

where x is the desired length (23.9 cm), μ is the mean length (24 cm), and σ is the standard deviation (0.05 cm).

Plugging in the values, we get:

z = (23.9 - 24) / 0.05 = -2

Using a standard normal distribution table or a calculator, we can find the corresponding proportion. A z-score of -2 corresponds to a proportion of approximately 0.0228. Therefore, approximately 0.0228 or 2.28% of rods have a length of less than 23.9 cm.

(b) To find the proportion of rods that will be discarded, we need to calculate the proportions for lengths shorter than 23.89 cm and longer than 24.11 cm separately.For lengths shorter than 23.89 cm, we can use the same approach as in part (a) to find the z-score:

z = (23.89 - 24) / 0.05 = -2.2

Using a standard normal distribution table or a calculator, we find that this corresponds to a proportion of approximately 0.0139.

For lengths longer than 24.11 cm, the z-score can be calculated as:

z = (24.11 - 24) / 0.05 = 2.2

Again, using a standard normal distribution table or a calculator, we find that this corresponds to a proportion of approximately 0.9861.To find the proportion of rods that will be discarded, we add the proportions for lengths shorter than 23.89 cm and longer than 24.11 cm:

0.0139 + 0.9861 = 1

Therefore, 100% of rods will be discarded.

(c) If 5000 rods are manufactured in a day and all of them will be discarded, the plant manager can expect to discard all 5000 rods.

(d) If an order comes in for 10,000 steel rods and all rods must be between 23.9 cm and 24.1 cm, we need to find the proportion of rods within this range and multiply it by the total number of rods.

The proportion of rods within the specified range can be calculated by subtracting the proportions of rods that would be discarded from 1:

1 - 1 = 0

Therefore, the plant manager should expect to manufacture 0 rods within the specified range, which means no rods will be produced to meet the order requirements.

Learn more about standard deviation here:- brainly.com/question/29115611

#SPJ11

The proof of inequality of |f(z0)| ≤ |g(z0)|, is given by the Maximum Modulus Principle.

The proof for the inequality |f(z)| ≤ |g(z)|, which holds on all z ∈ ∂D, to also hold for all z ∈ D, given that g(z) ≠ 0 for all z ∈ D ∪ ∂D, is as follows:

By considering the function G(z) = f(z)/g(z), we note that G(z) is analytic and continuous on D ∪ ∂D, and that G(z) is bounded by 1 for z ∈ ∂D, since;

|G(z)| = |f(z)/g(z)| ≤ |g(z)|/|g(z)| = 1;

for all z ∈ ∂D.

By the Maximum Modulus Principle, which states that;

If G(z) is analytic and continuous on a bounded domain D and continuous on D and its boundary ∂D, and is bounded on ∂D, then |G(z)| is also bounded on D.

In other words, the Maximum Modulus Principle says that, the maximum modulus of G(z) on D occurs on ∂D.

Therefore, there exists some point z0 ∈ D such that;

|G(z0)| = max{|G(z)| : z ∈ D};

Since |G(z)| ≤ 1 for all z ∈ ∂D, it follows that;

|G(z0)| ≤ 1;

Now, since G(z0) = f(z0)/g(z0), we have;

|f(z0)/g(z0)| ≤ 1.

This implies that; |f(z0)| ≤ |g(z0)|.

Hence, |f(z)| ≤ |g(z)| for all z ∈ D.

Learn more about Maximum Modulus Principle visit:

brainly.com/question/32554457

#SPJ11

The bearing of the chain line BAC is 048°30', and the chainage of point C is 147.8 m The point A is on the near bank of the river, point C is on the opposite bank, and point D is the end of the perpendicular AD.

Based on the given information, a sketch can be drawn to illustrate the scenario. The point A is on the near bank of the river, point C is on the opposite bank, and point D is the end of the perpendicular AD.

To determine the bearing of the chain line BAC, we need to find the angle between the line AD and the line AC. Since the bearing of AD is 048°30', and the bearing of DC is 288°30', the angle between them can be calculated as follows:

Angle ADC = 288°30' - 048°30' = 240°.

Since the bearing is measured clockwise from the north, the bearing of the chain line BAC is 048°30' (north of east).

To find the chainage of point C, we need to calculate the length of the line AC. This can be done by subtracting the length of AD from the chainage of point A:

Length of AC = Chainage of A - Length of AD = 207.8 m - 40 m = 167.8 m.

Therefore, the chainage of point C is 147.8 m when the chainage of point A is 207.8 m.

Learn more about perpendicular here:

https://brainly.com/question/12746252

#SPJ11

The probability that 4 trailer trucks will have no violations, 1 will have 1 violation, and 4 will have 2 or more violations if 9 trailer trucks are inspected can be calculated the required probability is 0.000008358.

The probability of a truck having no violations is 0.4.

The probability of a truck having 1 violation is 0.3.

The probability of a truck having 2 or more violations is 0.3.

The probability of 4 trucks having no violations is given by:0.4 × 0.4 × 0.4 × 0.4 = 0.0256

The probability of 1 truck having 1 violation is given by:0.3 × 0.4 × 0.4 × 0.4 × 4 = 0.0384

The probability of 4 trucks having 2 or more violations is given by:0.3 × 0.3 × 0.3 × 0.3 = 0.0081

Therefore, the probability that 4 trailer trucks will have no violations, 1 will have 1 violation, and 4 will have 2 or more violations if 9 trailer trucks are inspected is:0.0256 × 0.0384 × 0.0081 = 8.35776 × 10⁻⁶= 0.000008358 (rounded to at least three decimal places).

Therefore, the required probability is 0.000008358.

Learn more about Probability:

https://brainly.com/question/32963989

#SPJ11

The solution to the system of equations is

�=−2x=−2,�=7

y=7, and�=8z=8.

To solve the system of equations, we'll use the method of substitution.

Equation 1:�+24+�−52+�+42=1

4x+2​+2y−5​+2z+4​=1

Equation 2:

�+62−�−32+�+1=92

x+6​−2y−3+z+1=9

Equation 3:

�−13+�+34+�+26=1

3x−1​+4y+3​+6z+2

​=1

We can start by isolating one variable in one of the equations. Let's solve Equation 1 for

�

x:

�+24+�−52+�+42=1

4

x+2

​

+

2

y−5

​

+

2

z+4

​

=1

Multiply every term by 4 to eliminate the fraction:

�+2+2(�−5)+2(�+4)=4

x+2+2(y−5)+2(z+4)=4

Simplify:

�+2+2�−10+2�+8=4

x+2+2y−10+2z+8=4

Combine like terms:

�+2�+2�=4

x+2y+2z=4

Now we have an expression for

�x in terms of�y and�z.

Next, we'll substitute this expression into the other two equations:

Equation 2:

�+62−�−32+�+1=9

2x+6​−2y−3​+z+1=9

Substituting

�+2�+2�=4

x+2y+2z=4 into Equation 2:

(�+2�+2�)+62−�−32+�+1=9

2(x+2y+2z)+6​−2y−3​+z+1=9

Simplify:

�+2�+2�+62−�−32+�+1=9

2x+2y+2z+6​−2y−3​+z+1=9

Multiply every term by 2 to eliminate the fraction:

�+2�+2�+6−(�−3)+2�+2=18

x+2y+2z+6−(y−3)+2z+2=18

Simplify:

�+2�+2�−�+3+2�+2=18

x+2y+2z−y+3+2z+2=18

Combine like terms:

�+�+4�+5=18

x+y+4z+5=18

Now we have an expression for

�y in terms of�z.

Equation 3:

�−13+�+34+�+26=1

3x−1​+4y+3​+6z+2​

=1

Substituting

�+2�+2�=4

x+2y+2z=4 into Equation 3:

(�+2�+2�)−13+�+34+�+26=1

3(x+2y+2z)−1​+4y+3​+6z+2=1

Simplify:

�+2�+2�−13+�+34+�+26=1

3

x+2y+2z−1+4y+3​+6z+2

​=1

Multiply every term by 12 to eliminate the fractions:

4(�+2�+2�−1)+3(�+3)+2(�+2)=12

4(x+2y+2z−1)+3(y+3)+2(z+2)=12

Simplify:

4�+8�+8�−4+3�+9+2�+4=12

4x+8y+8z−4+3y+9+2z+4=12

Combine like terms:

4�+8�+8�+3�+2�=3

4x+8y+8z+3y+2z=3

Simplify:

4�+11�+10�=3

4x+11y+10z=3

Now we have an expression for

�z in terms of�x and�y.

We have three equations:

�+2�+2�=4

x+2y+2z=4

�+�+4�=13

x+y+4z=13

4�+11�+10�=3

4x+11y+10z=3

We can solve this system of equations using various methods, such as substitution or elimination. Solving the system, we find

�=−2x=−2,�=7y=7, and�=8z=8.

The solution to the given system of equations is

�=−2x=−2,�=7y=7, and�=8z=8.

These values satisfy all three equations in the system.

To know more about equations, visit :

brainly.com/question/12788590

#SPJ11

The given function is f(x, y) = 7xy, and the region R is defined by [tex]R = {(x, y): -1 ≤ x ≤ 1, 0 ≤ y ≤ √(1 - x²)}.[/tex]

We need to find the absolute maximum and minimum values of the given function on the region R.

Absolute maximum value: For this, we need to check the values of the function at the boundary of the region R, and also at the critical points (points where the partial derivatives are 0 or undefined).

The function is continuous and differentiable everywhere, so we can use the method of Lagrange multipliers to find the critical points.

[tex]Let g(x, y) = x² + y² - 1 = 0[/tex]be the equation of the boundary of the region R, and let λ be the Lagrange multiplier. Then [tex]we need to solve the following equations:∇f(x, y) = λ∇g(x, y)7y = 2λx7x = 2λy x² + y² - 1 = 0[/tex]

Multiplying the first equation by x and the second equation by y, and then subtracting the resulting equations, we get:[tex]7xy = 2λxy² + x² - xy + y² = 1[/tex]

Dividing the first equation by y, we get:7x = 2λ

Using this value of λ in the second equation, we get:4x² - 2xy + 4y² = 1Substituting 7x/2 for λ in the first equation, we get:y = 7x²/4Substituting this value of y in the equation of the boundary, we get:x² + (7x²/4) = 1

Solving for x, we get:x = ±√(4/11)Substituting this value of x in y = 7x²/4, we get:y = 7/11

[tex]Therefore, the critical points are (√(4/11), 7/11) and (-√(4/11), 7/11).[/tex]

Now we need to check the values of the function at these points and at the boundary of the regio[tex]n R.f(1, 0) = 0f(-1, 0) = 0f(√(4/11), 7/11) = 7(√(4/11))(7/11) = 2√(44)/11f(-√(4/11), 7/11) = 7(-√(4/11))(7/11) = -2√(44)/11f(x, y)[/tex] is negative for all other points on the boundary of R. Therefore, the absolute maximum value of f(x, y) on R occurs at the point [tex](√(4/11), 7/11), where f(x, y) = 2√(44)/11.[/tex]

Absolute minimum value:For this, we need to check the values of the function at the critical points (excluding the boundary of R), and also at the points where the partial derivatives are 0 or undefined.

Since there are no critical points (excluding the boundary of R), we only need to check the values of the function at the points [tex]where x = -1, 0, or 1.f(-1, 0) = 0f(0, 0) = 0f(1, 0) = 0f(x, y) is positive for all other points in R.[/tex]

Therefore, the absolute minimum value of f(x, y) on R occurs at any of the [tex]points (±1, √(3)/2), where f(x, y) = ±7√(3)/4.[/tex]Answer:The absolute maximum value of f(x, y) on R occurs at the [tex]point (√(4/11), 7/11), where f(x, y) = 2√(44)/11.[/tex]

[tex]The absolute minimum value of f(x, y) on R occurs at any of the points (±1, √(3)/2), where f(x, y) = ±7√(3)/4.[/tex]

To know more about the word differentiable visits :

https://brainly.com/question/13958985

#SPJ11

The absolute maximum value is f(√(1/2), 1/2) = 7(√(1/2))(1/2) = (7√2)/4, and the absolute minimum value is

f(-1, 0) = 7(-1)(0) = 0.

To find the absolute maximum and minimum values of the function f(x, y) = 7xy on the region R, we need to evaluate the function at its critical points and on the boundary of the region.

First, let's find the critical points of f(x, y) by taking the partial derivatives with respect to x and y and setting them equal to zero:

∂f/∂x = 7y = 0

∂f/∂y = 7x = 0

From these equations, we find that the only critical point is (x, y) = (0, 0).

Next, we need to evaluate the function on the boundary of the region R. The boundary consists of the semicircular disk described by -1 ≤ x ≤ 1 and 0 ≤ y ≤ √(1 - x²).

1. At y = 0:

  f(x, 0) = 7x(0) = 0

2. At y = √(1 - x²):

  f(x, √(1 - x²)) = 7x√(1 - x²)

To find the absolute maximum and minimum values, we compare the values of f(x, y) at the critical point and on the boundary.

At the critical point (0, 0), f(0, 0) = 7(0)(0) = 0.

Next, we evaluate f(x, √(1 - x²)) along the boundary:

f(x, √(1 - x²)) = 7x√(1 - x²)

To find the extreme values on the boundary, we can consider the function g(x) = 7x√(1 - x²). Since y = √(1 - x²), we eliminate y from the equation and work with g(x) instead.

Now, let's find the extreme values of g(x) on the interval -1 ≤ x ≤ 1. We can find these values by taking the derivative of g(x) and setting it equal to zero:

g'(x) = 7√(1 - x²) + 7x(-x / √(1 - x²)) = 7√(1 - x²) - 7x² / √(1 - x²)

Setting g'(x) equal to zero:

7√(1 - x²) - 7x² / √(1 - x²) = 0

Multiplying through by √(1 - x²) to clear the denominator:

7(1 - x²) - 7x² = 0

7 - 7x² - 7x² = 0

14x² = 7

x² = 7/14

x² = 1/2

x = ±√(1/2)

Since we are only interested in the interval -1 ≤ x ≤ 1, we consider the solution x = √(1/2).

Now, let's evaluate g(x) at the critical points and endpoints:

g(-1) = 7(-1)√(1 - (-1)²) = -7√(1 - 1) = -7(0) = 0

g(1) = 7(1)√(1 - 1) = 7(0) = 0

g(√(1/2)) = 7(√(1/2))√(1 - (√(1/2))²) = 7(√(1/2))

√(1 - 1/2) = 7(√(1/2))√(1/2) = 7(√(1/4)) = 7(1/2) = 7/2

From these evaluations, we can see that the absolute maximum value of f(x, y) on the region R occurs at (x, y) = (√(1/2), √(1 - (√(1/2))²)) = (√(1/2), 1/2), and the absolute minimum value occurs at (x, y) = (-1, 0).

Therefore, the absolute maximum value is f(√(1/2), 1/2) = 7(√(1/2))(1/2) = (7√2)/4, and the absolute minimum value is f(-1, 0) = 7(-1)(0) = 0.

To know more about partial derivatives, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/28750217

#SPJ11

To prove that \(AB^{-1} = B^{-1}A\), where \(A\) and \(B\) are \(n \times n\) matrices and \(B\) is invertible, we utilize the given condition that \(AB = BA\) and the property of matrix inverses.

To prove the statement \(AB^{-1} = B^{-1}A\), we start with the given condition \(AB = BA\), where \(A\) and \(B\) are \(n \times n\) matrices and \(B\) is invertible.

By multiplying both sides of \(AB = BA\) by \(B^{-1}\) from the right, we get \(AB B^{-1} = BA B^{-1}\). Since \(B B^{-1}\) is the identity matrix \(I\), we have \(AB I = B A B^{-1}\).

Simplifying the left side, we have \(A = B A B^{-1}\).

Next, we multiply both sides of this equation by \(B^{-1}\) from the left, yielding \(B^{-1}A = B^{-1}B A B^{-1}\). Again, using the fact that \(B^{-1}B\) is the identity matrix, we obtain \(B^{-1}A = A B^{-1}\).

Therefore, we have shown that \(AB^{-1} = B^{-1}A\), which verifies the given statement.

This result is significant because it demonstrates that when two matrices \(A\) and \(B\) commute (i.e., \(AB = BA\)), their inverses \(A^{-1}\) and \(B^{-1}\) also commute (i.e., \(AB^{-1} = B^{-1}A\)).

To learn more about  matrix Click Here: brainly.com/question/29132693

#SPJ11