The explicit rule for a sequence is given. an=3n+1 What is the recursive rule for the sequence? Responses a1=1; an=an−1+3 a subscript 1 end subscript equals 1 semicolon a subscript n end subscript equals a subscript n minus 1 end subscript plus 3 a1=4; an=an−1+1 a subscript 1 end subscript equals 4 semicolon a subscript n end subscript equals a subscript n minus 1 end subscript plus 1 a1=3; an=an−1+1 a subscript 1 end subscript equals 3 semicolon a subscript n end subscript equals a subscript n minus 1 end subscript plus 1 a1=4; an=an−1+3

Answer:

7)a. Brad--2/3, Lola--1/3

b. 2x + x = $630

3x = $630, so x = $210

Brad--$420, Lola--$210

8)a. William--3/7, Emma--4/7

b. 3x + 4x = $12,600

7x = $12,600, so x = $1,800

William--$5,400, Emma--$7,200

Let's start by assigning variables to the unknowns in the problem. Let x be the number of one-dollar bills,

y be the number of five-dollar bills, and z be the number of ten-dollar bills. From the problem, we know that: x + y + z = 35 (since there are 35 bills in total) 1x + 5y + 10z = 144 (since the total amount of money is $144) z = y + 2

(since there are two more ten-dollar bills than five-dollar bills) Now we can substitute the third equation into the second equation: 1x + 5y + 10(y + 2) = 144 Simplifying: 1x + 15y + 20 = 144 1x + 15y = 124 We have two equations with two variables: x + y + z = 35 x + 15y = 124 Solving for x in the second equation: x = 124 - 15y

Substituting into the first equation: (124 - 15y) + y + (y + 2) = 35 126 - 13y = 35 -13y = -91 y = 7

Now we can find z: z = y + 2 = 9 And finally, we can find x: x = 124 - 15y = 124 - 15(7) = 19 Therefore, there are 19 one-dollar bills, 7 five-dollar bills, and 9 ten-dollar bills.

learn more about dollar here:brainly.com/question/29846475

#SPJ11

a. The coordinate is located on the fourth quadrant.

b. The radius is given as follows: 17 units.

c. The sine of the angle is given as follows: sin(x) = -15/17.

The three trigonometric ratios are the sine, the cosine and the tangent, and they are defined as follows:

The coordinates of the point in this problem are given as follows:

(8, -15).

Hence the point is located on the fourth quadrant, as it has a positive x-coordinate and a negative y-coordinate.

The radius is equivalent to the hypotenuse of the right triangle, hence it is obtained applying the Pythagorean Theorem as follows:

r = 8² + (-15)²

r = sqrt(8² + (-15)²)

r = 17 units.

The sine of the angle is given by the y-coordinate divided by the radius, hence:

sin(x) = -15/17.

More can be learned about trigonometric ratios at brainly.com/question/24349828

#SPJ1

It is found that Jana has a higher batting average than Tasha this season, as she has a batting average of 80% while Tasha has a batting average of 75%.

To find which player has a higher batting average, we must compute the hit-to-attempt ratio for both Jana and Tasha.

Since Jana has hit the ball 8 times out of 10 attempts, so her batting average is:

Number of Hits / Total Attempts = Batting Average

Batting Average = 8 out of 10

Batting Average = 0.8 (80%).

Tasha batting average is:

Number of Hits / Total Attempts = Batting Average

Batting Average = 9 out of 12

75% batting average = 0.75

As a result, we can see that Jana has a higher batting average than Tasha this season, as she has a batting average of 80% while Tasha has a batting average of 75%.

To know more about average visit:

brainly.com/question/2906096

#SPJ1

The correct answer is a. single-factor, independent groups design. In this design, there is one independent variable with two or more levels, and participants are randomly assigned to these levels, making the groups independent.

A t test for independent groups is specifically used to compare the means of two independent groups in an experimental design, where participants are randomly assigned to either a control or treatment group. This design is also known as a between-subjects design, as participants are only exposed to one level of the independent variable (the treatment or control condition). The other options listed - matched groups design and nonequivalent groups design - both involve some form of matching or pairing of participants, which would require a different type of statistical test (e.g. a paired t test or ANOVA). This t-test compares the means of the experimental conditions to determine if there is a significant difference between them.

learn more about ANOVA here: brainly.com/question/23638404

#SPJ11

At the point (4,0) on the constraint line, it is a critical point on the surface. This means that it is a point where the partial derivatives of the surface are either zero or undefined.

It is also mentioned that it is a local max along the "constra" (presumably "constraint") line. This means that at this point, the surface has a maximum value along the constraint line. At the point (4,0) along the constraint line:
1. Check if it satisfies the constraint equation. If it does, then the point is on the constraint line.
2. Determine if the point (4,0) is a critical point on the surface by finding the gradient of the function and the constraint, and checking if they are parallel.
3. To find out if it's a local maximum, minimum, or saddle point along the constraint, you can perform the second derivative test or analyze the behavior of the function around the point (4,0).

In summary, at the point (4,0) along the constraint line, you need to verify if it's on the constraint, check if it's a critical point, and determine whether it's a local maximum, minimum, or saddle point.

learn more about saddle point here: brainly.com/question/29526436

#SPJ11

Answer:

whats the _?

Nvm you factorise the y(2x_3)

If rank(ST) < n, then by proving the contrapositive, it can be shown that rank(TS) < n. If 0 is an eigenvalue of ST, then 0 is also an eigenvalue of TS, as shown by analyzing the eigenvectors of ST and T.

(a) To prove the contrapositive, assume that rank(TS) = n. Then, by the rank-nullity theorem, the nullity of TS is 0. Therefore, the nullity of ST is also 0, since the nullity of TS and ST are equal. This means that the only vector in the kernel of ST is the zero vector.

Now, by the rank-nullity theorem again, we have that rank(ST) = n, since the dimension of the range of ST plus the nullity of ST equals the dimension of V, which is n. Hence, if rank(ST) < n, then rank(TS) < n.

(b) Suppose that 0 is an eigenvalue of ST, and let v be a corresponding eigenvector. Then, we have that ST(v) = 0, which implies that T(S(v)) = 0. Therefore, S(v) is in the null space of T, which is a subspace of V. Now, either S(v) = 0 or S(v) is an eigenvector of T with eigenvalue 0.

If S(v) = 0, then v is in the null space of S, which is also a subspace of V. Otherwise, S(v) is a nonzero eigenvector of T with eigenvalue 0, which means that it is in the null space of T.

In either case, we have shown that v is in the null space of TS, which means that 0 is an eigenvalue of TS. Hence, if 0 is an eigenvalue of ST, then 0 is an eigenvalue of TS.

In summary, if rank(ST) < n, then rank(TS) < n, and if 0 is an eigenvalue of ST, then 0 is an eigenvalue of TS.

To know more about contrapositive refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/30431677#

#SPJ11

Because her initial speed is already above the speed limit. So, the problem is not solvable under the given conditions.

Let's call Amanda's initial speed "s" (in mph). We know that she drove for 4 hours at speed s, and then for the remaining time (which is 6 hours), she drove at speed s - 20 mph.

The total distance of the trip is 400 miles. Using the distance formula:

distance = rate × time

we can write two equations:

First part of the trip:

400 = s × 4

Second part of the trip:

400 = (s - 20) × 6

Now we can solve for s. Starting with the first equation:

400 = s × 4

Dividing both sides by 4 gives:

s = 100

So Amanda's initial speed was 100 mph.

Checking with the second equation:

400 = (s - 20) × 6

Substituting s = 100, we get:

400 = (100 - 20) × 6

400 = 80 × 6

400 = 480

This equation is not true, which means that there must be an error in our calculations. The error is that Amanda cannot possibly have driven at 100 mph for 4 hours and then slowed down to 80 mph for the remaining 6 hours, because her initial speed is already above the speed limit. So, the problem is not solvable under the given conditions.

Learn more about initial speed Visit: brainly.com/question/29345000

#SPJ4

The probability of at least 4 of the next 5 flights being overbooked is 1.0%.

The probability of an event occurring is determined by analyzing the data from a sample.

A histogram is often used to visualize the distribution of data, which can be used to calculate the probability of an event occurring.

By examining the histogram, you can determine the probability of a certain event occurring based on the height of the corresponding bar in the graph.

From the histogram, it is clear that the probability of at least 4 of the next 5 flights being overbooked is 1.0%.

This is because there is only one bar in the histogram that corresponds to the probability of 4 out of 5 flights being overbooked.

This bar has a height of 1.0%, which indicates a 1.0% probability of at least 4 out of 5 flights being overbooked.

For similar question on probability:

https://brainly.com/question/30034780

#SPJ11

The points where constraints intersect on the boundary of the feasible region are termed as the "c. extreme points." In the context of linear programming problems, the feasible region represents the area where all constraints are satisfied.

Constraints are typically linear inequalities that define the limitations or conditions of a problem. When these constraints intersect, they form the boundaries of the feasible region.
Extreme points are critical because they often represent potential optimal solutions to the linear programming problem. The objective function contour refers to the graphical representation of the objective function, which is a linear function that represents the goal of the problem (e.g., minimizing cost or maximizing profit). Feasible points are any points within the feasible region that satisfy all constraints, while feasible edges are the lines or segments along the boundary of the feasible region that connect extreme points.

In summary, extreme points are the specific locations where constraints intersect on the boundary of the feasible region and play a significant role in determining the optimal solution to a linear programming problem.

To learn more about feasible region : brainly.com/question/29314086

#SPJ11

Yes, Σ( - η)^n is a power series.

It is centered at η = 0. The general form of a power series is Σ(a_n * (x - c)^n), where a_n represents the coefficients, x is variable, and c is the center of the series.

In this case, a_n = 1, x = η, and c = 0.

For more refer,

https://brainly.com/question/29896893#

#SPJ11

The number of dimes that Andrew had in the Pennies, dimes, and quarters worth $5.34 are 18.

Let the number of dimes be x. The amount of pennies would consequently double because there are twice as many pennies as there are dime. Let the number of quarters be y. We can set up two equations based on the given information,

0.10x + 0.01(2x) + 0.25y = 5.34

x + 2x + y = 39 (the total number of coins is 39)

Simplifying the first equation, we get,

0.10x + 0.02x + 0.25y = 5.34

0.12x + 0.25y = 5.34

Substituting x + 2x + y = 39, we get,

3x + y = 39

We can solve these two equations simultaneously to find the values of x and y,

0.12x + 0.25y = 5.34

3x + y = 39

Multiplying the second equation by 0.25, we get,

0.75x + 0.25y = 9.75

Subtracting this equation from the first equation, we get,

0.12x - 0.75x = 5.34 - 9.75

-0.63x = -4.41

x = 7

Substituting x = 7 in the equation 3x + y = 39, we get,

3(7) + y = 39

y = 18

Therefore, Andrew has 18 quarters.

To know more about substitution method, visit,

https://brainly.com/question/22340165

#SPJ4

Answer is  ∬1 sin(y) dy dx = -x cos(y) + g(y) + Cx + D,

To evaluate the double integral ∬1 sin(y) dy dx, we need to integrate with respect to y first and then integrate the result with respect to x.

Let's start by integrating with respect to y:

∫sin(y) dy = -cos(y) + C,

where C is the constant of integration.

Now, we have:

∬1 sin(y) dy dx = ∫[-cos(y) + C] dx.

Since we are integrating with respect to x, the integral of a constant (C) with respect to x is simply Cx. Therefore, we have:

∬1 sin(y) dy dx = ∫[-cos(y)] dx + ∫C dx.

The integral of -cos(y) with respect to x is:

-∫cos(y) dx = -x cos(y) + g(y),

where g(y) is the function of integration with respect to y.

So now we have:

∬1 sin(y) dy dx = -x cos(y) + g(y) + Cx + D,

where D is another constant of integration.

Since we don't have any limits of integration specified, we have indefinite integrals, and we cannot simplify the expression further without additional information or specific limits of integration.

To know more about integrate refer here

https://brainly.com/question/31744185#

#SPJ11

The p-value for this hypothesis test is 0.263.

The percentage of parents who feel overwhelmed has decreased from the pandemic/stay at home era, we can use a hypothesis test with the following null and alternative hypotheses:

Null hypothesis: The percentage of parents who feel overwhelmed is still 70%.

Alternative hypothesis: The percentage of parents who feel overwhelmed has decreased from 70%.

We can use a one-sample proportion test to test this hypothesis. The test statistic is calculated as:

z = (p - p0) / sqrt(p0 * (1 - p0) / n)

where p is the sample proportion, p0 is the hypothesized population proportion, and n is the sample size.

In this case, the sample proportion is:

p = 335 / 500 = 0.67

The hypothesized population proportion is:

p0 = 0.70

The sample size is:

n = 500

We can calculate the test statistic as:

z = (0.67 - 0.70) / sqrt(0.70 * (1 - 0.70) / 500) = -1.44

Using a standard normal distribution table or calculator, we can find the p-value associated with this test statistic.

For a two-tailed test with a significance level of 0.05, the p-value is approximately 0.1492.

This means that if the null hypothesis is true, there is a 14.92% chance of obtaining a sample proportion as extreme as 0.67 or more extreme in favor of the alternative hypothesis.

Since the p-value is greater than the significance level of 0.05, we fail to reject the null hypothesis.

Therefore, we do not have enough evidence to conclude that the percentage of parents who feel overwhelmed has decreased from the pandemic/stay at home era.

For similar question on p-value:

https://brainly.com/question/30461126

#SPJ11

40. A vector w that is perpendicular to the plane containing the given points A,B, and C is  (9,-4,-6)

41. A vector w that is perpendicular to the plane containing the given points A,B, and C is  (1,1,3)

40. To find a vector that is perpendicular to the plane containing A, B, and C, we can find the cross product of two vectors that lie in the plane. For example, we can use the vectors AB and AC:

AB = (2-(-1), 1-1, -1-2) = (3,0,-3)

AC = (0-(-1), -2-1, 4-2) = (1,-3,2)

Taking the cross product of these vectors, we get:

AB x AC = (0-(-9), -2-(-2), -3-(-3)) = (9,-4,-6)

So the vector w = (9,-4,-6) is perpendicular to the plane containing A, B, and C.

41. Again, to find a vector that is perpendicular to the plane containing A, B, and C, we can find the cross product of two vectors that lie in the plane. For example, we can use the vectors AB and AC:

AB = (0-1, 1-0, 0-0) = (-1,1,0)

AC = (2-1, 3-0, 1-0) = (1,3,1)

Taking the cross product of these vectors, we get:

AB x AC = (1,1,3)

So the vector w = (1,1,3) is perpendicular to the plane containing A, B, and C.

Learn more about vector at https://brainly.com/question/14527445

#SPJ11

Based on the given information, the graph represents the relationship between the number of adults present and the maximum number of children allowed on a field trip. Since the trip is allowing for a maximum of 12 children, we will analyze the graph to determine how many adults will be present.

Without the graph, we cannot provide the exact number of adults needed for 12 children. However, once you have the graph in front of you, simply locate the point on the graph where the number of children allowed (y-axis) is equal to 12. Then, trace the point horizontally to the corresponding number of adults on the x-axis. This will give you the number of adults required to supervise the 12 children during the field trip.

Remember to follow any guidelines or ratios that may be established by your school or organization regarding adult-to-child ratios on field trips, as this can impact the number of adults needed for the trip.

this graph represents the maximum number of children that are allowed on a field trip depending on the number of adults present to supervise. a trip is allowing for a maximum of 12 children. how many adults will be present? enter your answer in the box.

To learn more about graph : brainly.com/question/17267403

#SPJ11

Answer: 6.0

Step-by-step explanation:

tan 37 = x/8

x=8tan37

The name of the theory used to predict molecular shapes is called the "Valence Shell Electron Pair Repulsion" (VSEPR) theory.

The valence shell electron pair repulsion (VSEPR) theory is a model used to predict 3-D molecular geometry based on the number of valence shell electron bond pairs among the atoms in a molecule or ion. This model assumes that electron pairs will arrange themselves to minimize repulsion effects from one another. In other words, the electron pairs are as far apart as possible.

This theory helps us understand the shape of molecules by considering the repulsion between electron pairs in the valence shell of the central atom.

Learn more about "VSEPR":

https://brainly.com/question/29756299

#SPJ11

Upper Control Limit (UCL) for R chart = D4 x Rbar = 2.282 x 0.347 = 0.792 and Lower Control Limit (LCL) for R chart = D3 x Rbar = 0 x 0.347 = 0.

To determine the trial central line and control limits for the X and R control charts, we need to first calculate the average and range of each subgroup.
Average (Xbar):
Subgroup 1: 20.35
Subgroup 2: 20.40
Subgroup 3: 20.36
Subgroup 4: 20.65
Subgroup 5: 20.20
Subgroup 6: 20.40
Subgroup 7: 20.43
Subgroup 8: 20.37
Subgroup 9: 20.48
Subgroup 10: 20.42
Subgroup 11: 20.39
Subgroup 12: 20.38
Subgroup 13: 20.40
Subgroup 14: 20.41
Subgroup 15: 20.45
Subgroup 16: 20.34
Subgroup 17: 20.36
Subgroup 18: 20.42
Subgroup 19: 20.50
Subgroup 20: 20.31
Subgroup 21: 20.39
Subgroup 22: 20.39
Subgroup 23: 20.40
Subgroup 24: 20.41
Subgroup 25: 20.40

Average (Xbar) = (20.35 + 20.40 + 20.36 + 20.65 + 20.20 + 20.40 + 20.43 + 20.37 + 20.48 + 20.42 + 20.39 + 20.38 + 20.40 + 20.41 + 20.45 + 20.34 + 20.36 + 20.42 + 20.50 + 20.31 + 20.39 + 20.39 + 20.40 + 20.41 + 20.40)/25 = 20.408
Range (R):
Subgroup 1: 0.34
Subgroup 2: 0.36
Subgroup 3: 0.32
Subgroup 4: 0.36
Subgroup 5: 0.36
Subgroup 6: 0.35
Subgroup 7: 0.31
Subgroup 8: 0.34
Subgroup 9: 0.30
Subgroup 10: 0.37
Subgroup 11: 0.29
Subgroup 12: 0.30
Subgroup 13: 0.33
Subgroup 14: 0.36
Subgroup 15: 0.34
Subgroup 16: 0.36
Subgroup 17: 0.37
Subgroup 18: 0.73
Subgroup 19: 0.38
Subgroup 20: 0.35
Subgroup 21: 0.33
Subgroup 22: 0.33
Subgroup 23: 0.30
Subgroup 24: 0.34
Subgroup 25: 0.30

Range (R) = max(Range of each subgroup) - min(Range of each subgroup) = 0.73 - 0.29 = 0.44
Using these values, we can now calculate the trial central line and control limits:
Central line (CL) for X chart = Xbar = 20.408
Upper Control Limit (UCL) for X chart = CL + (A2 x Rbar) = 20.408 + (0.577 x 0.44) = 20.672
Lower Control Limit (LCL) for X chart = CL - (A2 x Rbar) = 20.408 - (0.577 x 0.44) = 20.144
Central line (CL) for R chart = Rbar = (0.34 + 0.36 + 0.32 + 0.36 + 0.36 + 0.35 + 0.31 + 0.34 + 0.30 + 0.37 + 0.29 + 0.30 + 0.33 + 0.36 + 0.34 + 0.36 + 0.37 + 0.73 + 0.38 + 0.35 + 0.33 + 0.33 + 0.30 + 0.34 + 0.30)/25 = 0.347
Upper Control Limit (UCL) for R chart = D4 x Rbar = 2.282 x 0.347 = 0.792
Lower Control Limit (LCL) for R chart = D3 x Rbar = 0 x 0.347 = 0
If any points fall outside of these control limits, it suggests that the process is out of control and requires investigation for assignable causes. Upon investigating, any assignable causes should be removed and the control chart revised accordingly.

Learn more about Limit here: brainly.com/question/12207563

#SPJ11

The best approximation for the circumference and area of the pizza would be = 56.52in and 254.34in² respectively.

To calculate the circumference of the pizza, the formula for the circumference of a circle is used such as follows:

Circumference of a circle = 2πr

where;

radius = Diameter/2

= 18/2 = 9

circumference = 2×3.14 × 9 = 56.52in

The area of the pizza = πr²

area = 3.14×9×9

= 254.34in²

Learn more about area here:

https://brainly.com/question/28470545

#SPJ1

The most effective beginning activity for introducing the concept of adding areas of smaller rectangles to make one larger rectangle for third-grade students would be to use manipulatives such as square tiles or grid paper.

The teacher can demonstrate how to add the areas of two smaller rectangles by physically placing them together to create a larger rectangle. The students can then work in pairs or small groups to create their own rectangles using the manipulatives and then add the areas together. This hands-on activity will help students visualize the concept and build a strong foundation for future math skills.

A most effective beginning activity for a third-grade teacher introducing the concept of adding areas of smaller rectangles to make one larger rectangle would be to use manipulatives, such as color-coded square tiles, to visually demonstrate how multiple smaller rectangles can be combined to form a larger rectangle. This hands-on approach allows students to explore and understand the concept in a concrete and engaging way.

Visit here to learn more about  rectangle : https://brainly.com/question/29123947
#SPJ11

Answer:

adding five

Step-by-step explanation:

-8 + 5 = -3

-3 + 5 = 2

2 + 5 = 7

7 + 5 = 12

The probability that a particular death is due to an automobile accident is 24/883 or 0.027.

This can be calculated by dividing the number of deaths due to automobile accidents (24) by the total number of deaths (883). Therefore, out of every 883 deaths, we can expect 24 of them to be due to an automobile accident. This probability is relatively low compared to the number of deaths due to cancer and heart disease, which highlights the importance of safe driving practices and preventative healthcare measures.

The National Center for Health Statistics reported that out of every 883 deaths, 24 resulted from an automobile accident. To find the probability of a particular death being due to an automobile accident, you need to divide the number of automobile accident deaths (24) by the total number of deaths (883).

The calculation is as follows: 24/883 = 0.027 (rounded to three decimal places).

So, the probability that a particular death is due to an automobile accident is 0.027 or 2.7%. The correct answer is 24/883 or 0.027.

To learn more about probability  click here

brainly.com/question/30034780

#SPJ11

The convergence of the power series Σa_n (x - 4)^n for the given values of x is as follows: x = 6: C (convergence),
x = -1: U (unknown), x = 0: U (unknown), x = 4: C (convergence)

For x = 6, the power series converges. This is because x = 6 lies within the interval of convergence centered at 4, as x = 8 also converges. So, for x = 6, the answer is C (convergence).

For x = -1, the convergence cannot be determined without more information. It lies outside the known interval of convergence (between 4 and 8). Therefore, for x = -1, the answer is U (unknown).

For x = 0, similarly to x = -1, we cannot determine the convergence without more information, as it is outside the known interval of convergence. So, for x = 0, the answer is U (unknown).

For x = 4, the power series converges because it is the center of the interval of convergence. Any power series converges at its center. Therefore, for x = 4, the answer is C (convergence).

To know more about convergence, refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/14823091#

#SPJ11

Complete question:

Suppose that Σa_n (x - 4)^n converges for x = 8 and diverges for x = 8.5. For each of the following values of x, determine whether or not the power series must converge. Enter C for convergence, D for divergence, or U if convergence cannot be determined.

x = 6 _____

x = -1 _________

x = 0 _______

x = 4_______

The final cost of the flip flops after the discount and tax would be  $25.56.

A discount is a decrease from the item's or service's initial cost. It is a widely utilized marketing strategy to draw clients and boost revenue. Discounts may be given for a number of reasons, including to get rid of excess inventory, to advertise brand-new goods, to win over more customers, and to compete with other companies.

The discounted price is determined by deducting the discount amount from the original price.

If the flip flops cost $30 before the discount, a 20% discount would be:

$30 x 0.20 = $6 discount

So the discounted price of the flip flops would be:

$30 - $6 = $24

After applying the discount, the tax would be applied to the discounted price. A 6.5% tax on $24 would be:

$24 x 0.065 = $1.56 tax

Therefore, the final cost of the flip flops after the discount and tax would be:

$24 + $1.56 = $25.56

To learn more about discount, refer  to:

https://brainly.com/question/12965533

#SPJ4

a. The conditional distribution of U is 1 / (u - a), a < u ≤ 1.

b.  The conditional distribution of U is  1 / (au), 0 < u < a.

We will use Bayes' theorem to compute the conditional distributions.

a. U > a:

The probability that U > a is given by P(U > a) = 1 - P(U ≤ a) = 1 - a. To compute the conditional distribution of U given that U > a, we need to compute P(U ≤ u | U > a) for u ∈ (a,1). By Bayes' theorem,

P(U ≤ u | U > a) = P(U > a | U ≤ u) P(U ≤ u) / P(U > a)

= [P(U > a ∩ U ≤ u) / P(U ≤ u)] [P(U ≤ u) / (1 - a)]

= [P(a < U ≤ u) / (u - a)] [1 / (1 - a)]

= 1 / (u - a), a < u ≤ 1.

Therefore, the conditional distribution of U given that U > a is a uniform distribution on (a,1), i.e., U | (U > a) ∼ U(a,1).

b. U < a:

The probability that U < a is given by P(U < a) = a. To compute the conditional distribution of U given that U < a, we need to compute P(U ≤ u | U < a) for u ∈ (0,a). By Bayes' theorem,

P(U ≤ u | U < a) = P(U < a | U ≤ u) P(U ≤ u) / P(U < a)

= [P(U < a ∩ U ≤ u) / P(U ≤ u)] [P(U ≤ u) / a]

= [P(U ≤ u) / u] [1 / a]

= 1 / (au), 0 < u < a.

Therefore, the conditional distribution of U given that U < a is a Pareto distribution with parameters α = 1 and xm = a, i.e., U | (U < a) ∼ Pa(1,a).

Learn more about uniformly distrributed at https://brainly.com/question/31384725

#SPJ11

The given series converges conditionally.

We can use the Dirichlet's test to determine the convergence of the given series.

Let aₙ = sin[(2n – 1)π/2] and bₙ = 1/n. Then, |bₙ| decreases monotonically to 0 and the partial sums of aₙ are bounded.

Now, let Sₙ = Σ aₖ. Then, we have:

S₁ = sin(π/2) = 1

S₂ = sin(3π/2) + sin(π/2) = 0

S₃ = sin(5π/2) + sin(3π/2) + sin(π/2) = -1

S₄ = sin(7π/2) + sin(5π/2) + sin(3π/2) + sin(π/2) = 0

We observe that Sₙ oscillates between 1 and -1, and does not converge. However, the series Σ |aₙ| = Σ sin[(2n – 1)π/2] is a convergent alternating series by the Alternating Series Test.

Therefore, the series converges conditionally.

Learn more about Convergent

brainly.com/question/15415793

#SPJ11

The Nyquist-Shannon sampling theorem, also known as the sampling theorem, states that if the sampling rate is greater than or equal to twice the maximum frequency of the signal being sampled, then the original signal can be perfectly reconstructed from its samples.

The maximum frequency of the signal is also referred to as the Nyquist frequency, which is half of the sampling rate. The theorem is often used in digital signal processing, data compression, and other applications where analog signals are converted into digital signals.

To know more about sampling theorem,

https://brainly.com/question/13844478

#SPJ11

The formula for the derivative y=g′(x) is y = 5.

To find the derivative y=g′(x) of the function y=g(x)=−x^2 + 5x + 7 using the limit definition, follow these steps:

1. Recall the limit definition of a derivative:

g′(x) = lim(h -> 0) [(g(x+h) - g(x)) / h]
2. Substitute the function g(x) into the definition:

g′(x) = lim(h -> 0) [(-x^2 + 5x + 7 - (-x^2 + 5(x+h) + 7)) / h]
3. Simplify the expression inside the limit:

g′(x) = lim(h -> 0) [(5h) / h]
4. Cancel out the common factor (h):

g′(x) = lim(h -> 0) [5]
5. As h approaches 0, the expression remains constant at 5.

So, the formula for the derivative y=g′(x) is y = 5.

Learn more about "derivative":

https://brainly.com/question/23819325

#SPJ11