The new intensity is 4 times the original value. Thus, if the intensity of the em wave was initially 10 W/m², it will be 40 W/m² when the amplitude of the electric field is doubled.
The intensity of an em wave is given as 10 W/m². If the amplitude of the electric field is doubled, the new intensity will be 4 times the original value. Hence, the intensity of the em wave will be 40 W/m².An electromagnetic wave consists of two perpendicular and transverse oscillations which are the electric field and magnetic field respectively. The two fields are perpendicular to the direction of propagation of the wave which means they are both oscillating in a plane perpendicular to the wave’s direction of travel.
The intensity of an electromagnetic wave is proportional to the square of its electric field amplitude. The formula to calculate the intensity is given as;I = E²/2μ where;I = IntensityE = Electric field amplitudeμ = Permeability of free space .
When the amplitude of the electric field is doubled, it means that the new amplitude is twice the original value. Thus, the new intensity can be calculated as follows; E_new = 2E_old Substituting the above value into the formula for intensity gives; I_new = (2E_old)²/2μ = 4(E_old²/2μ) = 4I_old .
Therefore, the new intensity is 4 times the original value. Thus, if the intensity of the em wave was initially 10 W/m², it will be 40 W/m² when the amplitude of the electric field is doubled.
To know more about Amplitude visit :
https://brainly.com/question/9525052
#SPJ11
A sheet of metal is illuminated by photons with a wavelength of 325 nm and the emitted electrons are found to have a maximum kinetic energy of 1.25 eV. If the same metal is illuminated by 225 nm light, what will be the speed of emitted electrons? Give your answer in km/s to 3 significant digits.
The speed of the emitted electrons when the metal is illuminated by 225 nm light is approximately 1.611 km/s.
To calculate the speed of emitted electrons, we can use the concept of the photoelectric effect and the equation for the kinetic energy of an electron:
K.E. = (1/2) * m * v^2
Where:
K.E. is the kinetic energy of the electron
m is the mass of the electron
v is the velocity of the electron
Given:
Wavelength of incident light (λ1) = 325 nm = 325 * 10^-9 m
Maximum kinetic energy (K.E.) = 1.25 eV
Wavelength of new incident light (λ2) = 225 nm = 225 * 10^-9 m
First, we need to find the energy of a photon using the equation:
E = hc / λ
Where:
E is the energy of a photon
h is Planck's constant (6.62607015 x 10^-34 J·s)
c is the speed of light (2.998 x 10^8 m/s)
λ is the wavelength of the light
For λ1:
E1 = (6.62607015 x 10^-34 J·s * 2.998 x 10^8 m/s) / (325 * 10^-9 m)
E1 ≈ 6.089 x 10^-19 J
For λ2:
E2 = (6.62607015 x 10^-34 J·s * 2.998 x 10^8 m/s) / (225 * 10^-9 m)
E2 ≈ 8.808 x 10^-19 J
Next, we can calculate the speed of the emitted electrons for the new wavelength using the equation:
K.E. = E - Φ
Where:
Φ is the work function of the metal (minimum energy required to release an electron)
Assuming the work function remains the same for the metal:
K.E. = E2 - Φ
Since K.E. = (1/2) * m * v^2, we can rearrange the equation to solve for v:
v = √((2 * K.E.) / m)
Given that the mass of an electron (m) is approximately 9.10938356 x 10^-31 kg, we can substitute the values:
v = √((2 * (8.808 x 10^-19 J - Φ)) / (9.10938356 x 10^-31 kg))
To find the value of Φ, we can use the given maximum kinetic energy for the incident light with λ1:
1.25 eV = 1.25 x 1.6 x 10^-19 J
So, Φ = 6.089 x 10^-19 J - 1.25 x 1.6 x 10^-19 J
Now, we can substitute the values and calculate the speed of the emitted electrons:
v = √((2 * (8.808 x 10^-19 J - (6.089 x 10^-19 J - 1.25 x 1.6 x 10^-19 J))) / (9.10938356 x 10^-31 kg))
v ≈ 1.611 x 10^6 m/s
Converting the speed to kilometers per second:
v ≈ 1.611 x 10^6 m/s * (1 km / 1000 m) * (1 s / 1000 ms)
v ≈ 1.611 km/s (to 3 significant digits)
Therefore, the speed of the emitted electrons when the metal is illuminated by 225 nm light is approximately 1.611 km/s.
To know more about emitted electrons, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/28174467
#SPJ11
Four very long current-carrying wires in the same plane intersect to form a square 50.0 cm on each side, as shown in Figure 3. 1. 1 =10.0 A 14 12=8.00 A 13 =20.0 A Figure 3
(a) Determine the magnitude and direction of the magnetic field produced by each current Lland ts at the center of the square.
(b) Determine the magnitude and direction of the current, 14 in the right vertical wire if the resultant magnetic field produced by all four wires at the center of the square is zero.
(a) The magnetic field produced by each current at the center of the square can be determined using the formula for the magnetic field produced by a long straight wire.
The magnitude of the magnetic field produced by each wire can be calculated using the equation:
B = (μ₀ * I) / (2 * π * r)
where B is the magnetic field, μ₀ is the permeability of free space, I is the current, and r is the distance from the wire to the center of the square. Since all four wires are in the same plane and intersect to form a square, the magnetic field produced by each wire will have the same magnitude and direction. The direction of the magnetic field can be determined using the right-hand rule, where the thumb points in the direction of the current and the curled fingers give the direction of the magnetic field.
(b) To determine the magnitude and direction of the current 14 in the right vertical wire, we need to ensure that the resultant magnetic field produced by all four wires at the center of the square is zero.
Since the magnetic fields produced by wires 1, 2, and 3 are known, we can use vector addition to find the magnitude and direction of the current 14 that will cancel out the net magnetic field. By adding the magnetic fields produced by each wire and setting the resultant field to zero, we can solve for the magnitude and direction of the current 14 in the right vertical wire.
To know more about magnetic field, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/23096032
#SPJ11
Suppose that a sound source is emitting waves uniformly in all directions. If you move to a point twice as far away from the course, the frequency of the sound will be...?
The answer is unchanged. Can someone please show this through equations or explain why it remains unchanged? Don't just say doppler effect, please :)
If λ doubles, the frequency must remain constant, and this is why the frequency of the sound will be unchanged when you move twice as far away from the source.
What is Doppler Effect?
The Doppler Effect is an alteration in the apparent frequency of sound caused by the motion of the source, the observer, or both. The Doppler Effect may be used to calculate the relative speeds of the source and observer or to estimate the frequency of sound waves from a distant source, such as a star. The Doppler Effect is referred to as the shift in the frequency of the sound. Mathematically, this shift in frequency is referred to as the Doppler shift. Doppler shift in sound
The Doppler shift in sound may be computed using the following equation:
fD= v/c × f0
where v is the relative velocity of the observer and the source c is the velocity of sound waves in a given mediumf0 is the frequency of the source f D is the frequency observed Suppose that a sound source is emitting waves uniformly in all directions.
If we use the formula v = λ f
to calculate the frequency of sound, we get the following formula
:f = v/λ
Therefore, if λ doubles, the frequency must remain constant, and this is why the frequency of the sound will be unchanged when you move twice as far away from the source.
To know more about Doppler Effect visit
https://brainly.com/question/28106478
#SPJ11
Find the angle theta between the vectors. (Round your answer to two decimal places.)
u = (4, 3), v = (5, −12),
u, v
= u · v
theta = radians
Let's find the angle theta between the vectors u and v. Recall that the dot product between two vectors is defined as the product of their magnitudes and the cosine of the angle between them.
That isu · v = |u| |v| cos(theta)Rearranging this formula, we obtain
cos(theta) = (u · v) / (|u| |v|)
Note that
|u| = [tex]sqrt(4^2 + 3^2)[/tex]
= 5 and
|v| =[tex]sqrt(5^2 + (-12)^2)[/tex]
= 13.
Therefore,
u · v = 4*5 + 3*(-12)
= -8
Thus,cos(theta) = -8 / (5 * 13)
= -8/65.
Now, let's find the angle theta using a calculator. The inverse cosine function (denoted cos^(-1)) of -8/65 is given bytheta = [tex]cos^(-1)(-8/65)[/tex]We can convert this angle to degrees or radians as required by the problem. If we use degrees, then we have to convert the angle from degrees to radians using the formula radians = (pi / 180) * degrees. If we use radians, then we simply leave the answer in radians.Let's use radians, and round to two decimal places. Thus,
theta = [tex]cos^(-1)(-8/65)[/tex]
≈ 1.84
Therefore, the angle between the vectors u and v is approximately 1.84 radians.
For more information on radians visit:
brainly.com/question/27025090
#SPJ11
true or false: destructive interference is the result of superposition of waves in phase.
False. Destructive interference is not the result of the superposition of waves in phase. Superposition is a term used to describe the phenomenon that occurs when two waves meet and combine to form a new wave.
The waveforms add together to create the new waveform, which has characteristics that are determined by the properties of the original waves.What is destructive interference?When waves meet and their waveforms are out of phase, destructive interference occurs. The amplitude of the resulting waveform is decreased, and the resulting waveform has a different shape than either of the original waveforms. Destructive interference, also known as out-of-phase interference, occurs when two waves meet and cancel each other out. When the waves are in phase, they combine to form a larger waveform with greater amplitude than either of the original waveforms. This is known as constructive interference.To conclude, destructive interference is not the result of the superposition of waves in phase. It occurs when two waves are out of phase and combine to create a new waveform that has a smaller amplitude than either of the original waveforms.
To know more about Superposition visit :
brainly.com/question/12493909
#SPJ11
what is the approximate thermal energy in kj/mol of molecules at 75 ° c?
Answer:
if you like it please do appreciate
To calculate the approximate thermal energy in kilojoules per mole (kJ/mol) of molecules at a given temperature, you can use the Boltzmann constant (k) and the ideal gas law.
The Boltzmann constant (k) is approximately equal to 8.314 J/(mol·K). To convert this to kilojoules per mole, we divide by 1000:
k = 8.314 J/(mol·K) = 0.008314 kJ/(mol·K)
Now, we need to convert the temperature to Kelvin (K) since the Boltzmann constant is defined in Kelvin. To convert from Celsius to Kelvin, we add 273.15 to the temperature:
T(K) = 75°C + 273.15 = 348.15 K
Finally, we can calculate the thermal energy using the formula:
Thermal energy = k * T
Thermal energy = 0.008314 kJ/(mol·K) * 348.15 K
Thermal energy ≈ 2.894 kJ/mol
Therefore, at 75°C, the approximate thermal energy of molecules is approximately 2.894 kilojoules per mole (kJ/mol).
The heat capacity of one mole of water is approximately 75.29/1000 = 0.07529 kj/mol. This value represents the approximate thermal energy in kj/mol of water molecules at 75 ° C.
Thermal energy refers to the energy present in a system that arises from the random movements of its atoms and molecules. When a body has a temperature of 75 ° C, it has a thermal energy that depends on the type of molecules in it and their specific heat capacity.
In this context, we will consider the thermal energy in kj/mol of molecules at 75 ° C.Let's use water as an example to calculate the approximate thermal energy in kj/mol of molecules at 75 ° C. The specific heat capacity of water is 4.18 J/g °C, and the molar mass of water is 18.01528 g/mol. Therefore, the thermal energy in kj/mol of water molecules at 75 ° C can be calculated as follows:ΔH = mcΔt, whereΔH = thermal energy,m = mass of the sample,c = specific heat capacity of the sample,Δt = change in temperature
To know more about heat capacity visit:-
https://brainly.com/question/28302909
#SPJ11
how can humans avoid the possible damaging effects of nanotechnology?
Nanotechnology is a rapidly expanding field with a wide range of applications, from medicine and electronics to energy and manufacturing. While the possibilities of nanotechnology are vast, there are potential risks associated with it, such as toxicity, environmental impact, and unintended consequences.
Here are some ways in which humans can avoid the possible damaging effects of nanotechnology:1. Regulation: Governments should put regulations in place to control the use and development of nanotechnology. These regulations should include safety standards and ethical guidelines for the research and development of nanotechnology.
2. Research: Researchers should conduct studies to determine the potential risks of nanotechnology and ways to minimize them. This research should include toxicology studies, environmental impact assessments, and assessments of unintended consequences.
3. Education: Educating the public about the potential risks of nanotechnology is essential. The public should be aware of the potential risks and how to protect themselves.
4. Proper use: The proper use of nanotechnology can also minimize the potential risks associated with it. For example, nanoparticles used in consumer products should be designed to minimize toxicity and should be used only when necessary.5. Disposal: The proper disposal of nanomaterials is also important to minimize the potential risks. Nanomaterials should be disposed of in a manner that minimizes their impact on the environment and human health.
To learn more about Nanotechnology visit;
https://brainly.com/question/26155132
#SPJ11
4 batteries of emf 2 V and internal resistance 4 each in parallel are connected to the external resistance 3. The power liberated by the external resistance is: O A. 0.75 W B. 0.4 W C. 40 W D. 220 mW E. None of the above QUESTION 3 The circuit parameters are as follows R1=1 12, R2=5 and the ideal (zero internal resistance) batteries of emfs E1=E2=E3=8 V each. Find the current through the battery E3.
The power liberated by external resistance will be 0.75W. option A is correct. The magnitude of the current through E₃ is 16/3A.
When batteries are connected in parallel, the total EMF remains the same while the internal resistances add up reciprocally. Therefore, the equivalent EMF of the parallel combination is also 2V, and the equivalent internal resistance is 1Ω (1/R_eq = 1/4 + 1/4 + 1/4 + 1/4 = 1).
Using Ohm's Law, the current flowing through the circuit is given by I = E_eq / (R + r_eq), where E_eq is the equivalent emf, R is the external resistance, and r_eq is the equivalent internal resistance.
Given E_eq = 2V and R = 3Ω, we have;
I = 2V / (3Ω + 1Ω) = 2V / 4Ω = 0.5A
The power liberated by the external resistance can be calculated using the formula P = I² × R, where I is the current and R is the resistance.
P = (0.5A)² × 3Ω = 0.25W × 3Ω = 0.75W
Therefore, the power liberated by the external resistance is 0.75W
Hence, A. is the correct option.
Since the batteries are ideal with zero internal resistance, the current through each battery will depend only on the external resistances connected in the circuit.
To find the current through battery E3, we can analyze the circuit using Ohm's Law and Kirchhoff's Laws.
Using Kirchhoff's Voltage Law (KVL) in the loop containing E₃, R₁, and R₂, we have:
-E₁ + I₁R₁ + I₂R₂ + E₃ = 0
Since E₁ = E₂ = E₃ = 8V and R₁ = 1Ω, R₂ = 5Ω, we can rewrite the equation as:
-8V + I11Ω + I25Ω + 8V = 0
Simplifying the equation, we have:
I₁ + 5I₂ = 0
We also know that the total current entering the node containing E₃ is equal to the current leaving the node. Therefore, I₃ = I₁ + I₂.
Substituting the value of I₁ from the previous equation, we get:
I₃ = -5I₂ + I₂ = -4I₂
Since we are interested in finding the current through battery E₃, which is I₃, we need to determine the value of I₂.
To find I₂, we can use Ohm's Law in the loop containing R₁, R₂, and E₂:
I₂ = E₂ / (R₁ + R₂) = 8V / (1Ω + 5Ω) = 8V / 6Ω = 4/3A
Finally, substituting the value of I₂ back into the equation for I₃, we get:
I₃ = -4 × (4/3)A = -16/3A
The negative sign indicates that the current through battery E₃ is in the opposite direction to our assumed direction. Therefore, the magnitude of the current through E₃ is 16/3A.
To know more about external resistance here
https://brainly.com/question/16092065
#SPJ4
A person inhales and exhales 1.5 L of 38 °C air, evaporating of 0.04 g water from the lungs and breathing passages with each breath. The latent heat of vaporization of water is 2430 × 10³ J/kg. Use 1 L = 10-³m³. Density of air = 1.29 kg/m³, and the specific heat of air is 721 J/(kg°℃) (a) How much heat transfer occurs due to evaporation in each breath? Heat transfered in each breath = (b) What is the rate of heat transfer in watts if the person is breathing at a moderate rate of 18.0 breaths per minute? Rate of heat transfer= W (c) If the inhaled air had a temperature of 20 °C, what is the rate of heat transfer for warming the air? Think & Prepare 1. To raise the temperature of air from 20°C to 38°C, how much heat is required? 2. How will you calculate the mass of air from its volume and density? 3. Use the breathing rate to calcuate the rate of heat transfer in W. Rate of heat transfer= W (d) Discuss the total rate of heat transfer as it relates to typical metabolic rates. Will this breathing be a major form of heat transfer for this person? Total heat tranfer during to two processes W
In each breath, 0.04 g of water evaporates, resulting in a heat transfer of 97.2 J due to evaporation. At a breathing rate of 18 breaths per minute, the rate of heat transfer is 29.13 W. Additionally, warming the inhaled air from 20°C to 38°C contributes a heat transfer of 22.128 J. The total rate of heat transfer per breath is 119.328 J. However, compared to overall metabolic heat production, breathing is a minor form of heat transfer for this person.
(a) To calculate the heat transferred due to evaporation in each breath, we need to find the amount of heat required to evaporate the water.
The formula for heat transfer due to evaporation is Q = m × Lv, where Q is the heat transfer, m is the mass of water evaporated, and Lv is the latent heat of vaporization of water.
Here, m = 0.04 g and Lv = 2430 × 10³ J/kg. Converting the mass to kilograms, we get m = 0.04 × 10⁻³ kg. Substituting the values, we find Q = (0.04 × 10⁻³ kg) × (2430 × 10³ J/kg) = 97.2 J.
(b) The rate of heat transfer in watts can be calculated by dividing the total heat transfer by the time taken.
Given that the breathing rate is 18.0 breaths per minute, the time for each breath is 1 minute / 18 breaths = 1/18 minutes = (1/18) × 60 seconds.
Thus, the rate of heat transfer is 97.2 J / [(1/18) × 60 s] = 97.2 J / 3.33 s = 29.13 W.
(c) To calculate the rate of heat transfer for warming the air, we need to determine the amount of heat required to raise the temperature of air from 20°C to 38°C.
The formula for heat transfer due to temperature change is Q = m × c × ΔT, where m is the mass of air, c is the specific heat of air, and ΔT is the change in temperature.
We can calculate the mass of air using the density of air and the volume of air inhaled and exhaled in each breath. The volume of air is given as 1.5 L, which is equal to 1.5 × 10⁻³ m³.
The density of air is 1.29 kg/m³. Thus, the mass of air is (1.5 × 10⁻³ m³) × (1.29 kg/m³) = 1.935 × 10⁻³ kg. Substituting the values, we find Q = (1.935 × 10⁻³ kg) × (721 J/(kg°℃)) × (38°C - 20°C) = 22.128 J.
(d) The total rate of heat transfer for each breath is the sum of the heat transfer due to evaporation and the heat transfer for warming the air.
Thus, the total rate of heat transfer per breath is 97.2 J + 22.128 J = 119.328 J.
Considering the breathing rate of 18 breaths per minute, the total rate of heat transfer would be 119.328 J/breath × 18 breaths/minute = 2147.904 J/minute.
This form of heat transfer through evaporation and warming of inhaled air is relatively small compared to the overall metabolic heat production in the human body.
Metabolic rates are typically in the range of hundreds to thousands of watts, while the heat transfer rate in this case is only 2147.904 J/minute, equivalent to approximately 35.798 W.
Therefore, breathing alone is not a major form of heat transfer for this person compared to other metabolic processes.
To know more about heat transfer refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/282010#
#SPJ11