The largely unsubstantiated fear that morphine was inexpensive was important in building support for federal drug control laws. Then it quickly became clear.
d) morphine was inexpensive and readily available
In a political system known as cooperative federalism, it is unclear where the duties and powers of the federal and state governments begin and end. In a system known as dual federalism, the roles and powers of the federal and state governments are explicitly established.
The strict Dual Federalist framework divides authority between the federal and state governments. Additionally, it encourages competitiveness while respecting each party's right to self-determination in their own domains. A vertical power arrangement between the federal and state governments, cooperative federalism is more adaptable and encourages cooperation.
Learn more about federalism
https://brainly.com/question/8305583
#SPJ4
Which of the following schools of jurisprudence recognizes that the ill, children, the aged, the disabled, and the poor require assistance to meet their fundamental needs of life, health, and education?
The school of jurisprudence that recognizes the need for assistance to meet the fundamental needs of life, health, and education for vulnerable populations is called Social Justice Jurisprudence.
The need for assistance to meet the fundamental needs of life, health, and education for vulnerable populations such as the sick, children, the elderly, the disabled, and the poor is recognized in social justice law. This approach prioritizes fairness and equality, focusing on the rights and well-being of marginalized and disadvantaged groups.
The approach of Social Justice Jurisprudence emphasizes fairness and equality, as well as the protection and promotion of the rights and well-being of marginalized and disadvantaged groups.
A social justice approach acknowledges the impact of power relations at both the societal and individual levels, as well as how certain structural features of societies create inequities in the distribution of resources and decision-making opportunities.
For more questions on Social Justice Jurisprudence
https://brainly.com/question/30356695
#SPJ4
in an experiment conducted to demonstrate boyle's law, what would you have to plot to generate a straight line thus proving boyle's law?
In an experiment conducted to demonstrate Boyle's law, to generate a straight line use a graph of V against 1p is a straight line through the origin.
To illustrate Boyle's law, an experiment was conducted that resulted in a graph of volume (V) plotted against inverse pressure (1/p). This experiment showed that a straight line can be drawn through the origin, thus proving Boyle's law.
This states that for a fixed mass and constant temperature, the volume of a gas is inversely proportional to the pressure. In other words, the higher the pressure, the lower the volume and vice versa. The experiment conducted provided evidence to support this law and to demonstrate it's validity.
To know more about experiment, click here.
https://brainly.com/question/11256472
#SPJ4
would fiscal policy be weakened, or even rendered useless, by such a law?
Fiscal policy refers to government actions used to improve the economy, specifically through changing the amounts and allocations of governmental spending and taxes.
A government is indeed the system or collection of individuals in charge of an organized society, most commonly a state. In the broadest sense, government is made up of the legislative, the executive, and the judiciary. Government is both a tool of enforcing organizational policies and a system for defining policy. Many governments have a form of constitution, a declaration of their governing ideas and philosophy. While governance exists in many sorts of organizations, the term government is frequently used to refer to the 200 autonomous national governments including subsidiary organizations. In the contemporary age, the primary forms of political systems include democracies, monarchies, authoritarian & totalitarian regimes. Monarchy, aristocracy, timocracy, oligarch, democracy, and theocracy have all been historically dominant systems of governance.
Learn more about systems here
https://brainly.com/question/30328846
#SPJ4
if an offer says that the offeree must accept by registered letter, the offeree may accept by a regular letter, but the acceptance only is effective when it is received by the offeror. (do not consider the ucc or the restatement (second) of contracts.)
a. true
b. false
The given statement "If an offer says that the offeree must accept by registered letter, the offeree may accept by a regular letter, but the acceptance only is effective when it is received by the offeror. (do not consider the ucc or the restatement (second of contracts.)"is false.
What time do acceptances take effect?When the offeree places an acceptance in the mailbox, it takes effect. A revocation takes effect when it is received by the offeree, but an acceptance takes effect when it is sent from the offeree to the offeror.
In this instance, the offeree must refuse the offer if he wants to avoid being bound. If an offer specifies that the offeree must accept in writing via registered mail, the offeree may do so using ordinary mail; however, the acceptance will only be considered accepted once it has been received by the offeror.
Learn more about contracts at:
https://brainly.com/question/984979
#SPJ1
1. what are the two fundamental questions in developing an inventory policy?
Two fundamental questions in developing an inventory policy are when to order and how much shall one order?
One of a company's most valuable assets is its inventory because it is one of the main sources of revenue generation and, consequently, a source of profits for the company's shareholders.
Inventory control's primary goal is to minimize procurement costs while controlling holding costs to keep inventory stocked on your shelves. In addition, pricing of inventory must be done correctly to meet all the carrying and ordering expenses.
the two questions that need to be considered when developing and inventory policy are : In what quantity shall inventory be ordered? And when shall the inventory be ordered?
Both the raw materials used in production and the finished commodities that are offered for sale are included in the definition of inventory.
To know more about inventory policy, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/30155081
#SPJ4
2. how bernburg and krohn propose to measure the effects of labelling on structured opportunities?
Bernburg (2009) disputes that the shame fastened to deviant labels can provoke the processes that bring about expulsion from connections with normal possible choices.
Thus, it is reasonable that in an official manner labeled things will count on each one by way of escape as well as for freedom and agreement. Scholars have currently revived labeling theory as an enlightening hypothesis of fundamental hurt. According to this approach, official intervention increases the anticipation of difficulty in after misconduct and deviance cause invasion and sparks restricted processes that have negative results for conventional space.
The belief thinks that an official attack in adolescence increases the difficulty in misdemeanors in early maturity on account of the negative effect of the intervention on instructional accomplishment and contracting. Using committee data on city men that span early adulthood through early maturity, we find abundant support for this revised labeling approach. Bernburg disputes that the shame fastened to deviant labels can provoke the processes that bring about expulsion from connections with normal possible choices.
To know more about labelling refer to: https://brainly.com/question/21469257
#SPJ4
2. Did you find example of bias in the CNN article? What information was included or left out? Who was
made to seem victimized and who was made to seem unreasonable?
The person that would be made to be victimized would be the one that is seen as a weaker person in the argument. The person that is unreasonable would be the one that is being painted as one that is creating issues.
What is media bias?The word "media bias" refers to a systematic or widespread bias that violates the journalistic norms, not the viewpoint of a particular journalist or piece. There is much debate on the type and severity of media bias in different nations.
US media outlets distort information when they cover news in a way that is inconsistent with the norms of professional journalism or when they use entertainment media to advance a political goal. This is known as media bias in the US.
Read more on media bias here: https://brainly.com/question/29864852
#SPJ1
Taylor is called for jury duty. However, the defendant's attorney decides to have him removed from the jury pool because he wants the jury to be comprised of predominantly African Americans. In this case:
Option A: the defense attorney use of peremptory challenge to exclude Taylor from the jury could be successfully contested and disallowed because it is unconstitutional, is the right choice in this case.
The prosecution and defense have the chance to oust prospective jurors they don't want from the jury during jury selection in a criminal trial. Both the prosecution and the defense may raise an unlimited number of "cause" objections to disqualify potential jurors from the case. As a result, Option A turns out to be the best option.
As a citizen of the United States, it is your responsibility to participate in a court case as a jury. By participating in a jury, you uphold the defendant's Sixth Amendment right to a prompt and fair trial. 1 If you are selected for jury duty, you have to show up in court or you could be found in contempt of court.
To know more about jury selection, refer to the following link:
https://brainly.com/question/23497087
#SPJ4
Complete question is:
Taylor is called for jury duty. However, the defendant's attorney decides to have him removed from the jury pool because he wants the jury to be comprised of predominantly African Americans. In this case:
a. the defense attorney's use of the peremptory challenge to exclude Taylor from the jury could be successfully contested and disallowed because it is unconstitutional.
b. a judge may not invade the privacy of an attorney's theory of a case as manifested in peremptory challenges.
c. the attorney will succeed in keeping Taylor off the jury because his defendant is an African American. The attorney may use his unlimited number of challenges for cause because of the potential for racial discrimination on the part of Taylor.
d. the defendant's attorney will succeed in keeping Taylor off the jury because he has a limited number of peremptory challenges for which no cause is required to disqualify a juror
the defense attorney use of peremptory challenge to exclude Taylor from the jury could be successfully contested and disallowed because it is unconstitutional
citizenship of a particular country is known as one's , which may or may not be tied to one's culture.
The term "nationality" refers to a person's citizenship of a specific nation, which may or may not be connected to their culture.
The nation of one's nationality designates the place of birth and citizenship. Birth, inheritance, or naturalization are the three ways to obtain the status. An immigrant is, to put it simply, a person who was born outside of the country they currently call home.
No matter if the individual has acquired citizenship in the country of destination, served in its military, wed a native, or has another status, they will always be considered international migrants. The term "citizen" first appeared in Ancient Greece to refer to people who were legally entitled to take part in public matters.
Learn more about Citizenship Visit: brainly.com/question/30131501
#SPJ4
Correct Question:
Citizenship of a particular country is known as one's ___ which may or may not be tied to one's culture.
Consent must be voluntary for a valid warrantless search.Other factors that may be considered in determining whether a search was voluntary are
A) age.
B) mental impairment.
C) intoxication.
D) all of these.
Voluntary consent is an important factor in determining whether a warrantless search is valid. For a search to be considered voluntary, the individual must provide consent without any coercion or duress. Other factors that may be considered in determining whether a search was voluntary include age, mental impairment, and intoxication.
Therefore, correct answer is D) all of these.
Age can be a factor in determining consent, as minors are typically not considered to be able to provide informed consent. Mental impairment can also be a factor, as individuals who are not of sound mind may be more susceptible to coercion or persuasion. Intoxication is also a factor, as a person who is intoxicated may not be capable of making a reasoned decision or providing valid consent. All of these factors should be considered when determining whether a warrantless search is valid and voluntary.
know more about Voluntary consent here
https://brainly.com/question/28558109#
#SPJ11
Person-centered planning was adopted into michigan state law in 2019. True or False?
Person-centered planning was adopted into michigan state law in 2019 this statement is False beacuse Person-centered planning was adopted into michigan state law in 2006.
Person-center planning is a strengths-based, individualized approach that focuses on the person's goals, preferences, and needs, and aims to provide a personalized plan for their support and care.
The implementation of person-centered planning may be encouraged by various organizations and systems, but it is not a legally binding requirement in Michigan or any other state.
To know more about Person-centered planning click on the link below:
https://brainly.com/question/29603007#
#SPJ11
If an individual is bringing a lawsuit against your EMS system for perceived improper care, which type of liability action will it probably be?
A.
Criminal
B.
State
C.
Federal
D.
Civil
If an individual is bringing a lawsuit against an EMS system for perceived improper care, it will probably be a civil liability action (D).
Civil liability actions are lawsuits brought by individuals or groups who believe they have been wronged, such as receiving improper care from the EMS system.
These types of lawsuits are heard in civil court and the burden of proof is on the plaintiff to show that the EMS system failed to provide proper care, resulting in harm or injury.
The EMS system is a type of emergency medical service that provides medical assistance to individuals in emergency situations. Civil liability actions are brought by individuals who believe that they have been wronged in some way, such as receiving improper care from the EMS system.
These types of lawsuits are typically brought in a civil court and the burden of proof is on the plaintiff, who must show that the EMS system failed to provide proper care, resulting in harm or injury.
It is important to note that criminal liability actions are brought by the government against individuals or organizations who have committed a crime, while state and federal liability actions are typically related to regulatory compliance and can be brought by either the government or an individual.
For more about the EMS system:
https://brainly.com/question/15900
#SPJ11
does monarchy exist in the middle east or africa
Yes, there are still some monarchies in the Middle East and Africa today. A monarchy is a form of government in which the power is held by a single person, usually a king or queen, who inherits the position by birth or tradition.
In the Middle East, there are several countries that still have monarchies, including Saudi Arabia, Bahrain, and Brunei. In these countries, the monarchy has a significant amount of political power and the king or queen has the final say in important matters of government.
In Africa, there are a few countries that also have monarchies, including Morocco and Swaziland. In these countries, the role of the monarchy can vary, with some having more ceremonial functions while others have more political power.
It is important to note that while there are still some monarchies in the Middle East and Africa, many countries in the region have adopted other forms of government, such as republics or dictatorships. The role and power of the monarchy can also vary greatly between countries and even within the same country over time.
To know more about monarchy refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/3458331#
#SPJ11
a political philosopher would most likely do which of the follwing
A political philosopher would most likely think about the goals a given society should strive toward achieving.
Political philosophy can be characterised as philosophical consideration of the best configuration of our collective existence.
Political philosophy has indeed been studied for as long as people have believed that collective agreements do not belong in the natural order, and as a result, require philosophical explanation.
This mainly includes our political institutions and social behaviours like our economic system and family structure.
Political philosophers work to lay out fundamental ideas that, for example, justify a specific type of government, demonstrate that people have certain unalienable rights, or explain how a society's material resources should be distributed among its members.
This typically entails critically analysing and interpreting concepts like liberty, justice, authority, and democracy before applying them to the existing social and political structures.
The question is incomplete. The complete question is:
A political philosopher would most likely do which of the following?
a. Think about the goals a given society should strive toward achieving.
b. Think about the goals an individual should strive toward achieving.
c. Think about the goals members of a religions should strive toward achieving.
d. Think about the enviromental issues.
To know more about political philosophies, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/12021012
#SPJ4
what is the responsibility of real estate personnel to access, read, interpret and apply legislation to their real estate activity?
The responsibility of real estate personnel is to to access, read, interpret and apply legislation to their real estate activity.
A subset of civil law known as real estate law deals with the rights to own, hold, utilise, and enjoy land as well as any enduring structures that are permanently affixed to it.
Most of us are affected by real estate law on a daily basis, whether directly or indirectly, whether we are homeowners, renters, landlords, home purchasers, or home sellers
Buying, selling, and renting of homes, land, and other properties is made easier by real estate agents. Agents must comply with their state's licencing standards because there is no national real estate licence.
A licensed broker, who oversees the compliance of all the agents in the office, is required for agents to work for and under the supervision of.
A real estate officer is also tasked with the responsibility to be updated with all the real estate laws and interpret them in the right light for himself as well as for the clients benefit.
To know more about real estate agents, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/29124410
#SPJ4
is a form of subjective decision making that begins when a victim or witness decides whether or not to report a crime to the police.
The main purpose of the contract was for construction services. An "estimated" or witness decides is stated in the contract. Project and construction-related terms were utilized in the contract.
It is a method that entails extrapolating specific instances of the relevant law from a small sample of cases to a larger group of situations. The historical, empirical, or a posteriori methods are other names for it.
It is also possible to say that it is a real-world approach to legal issues in work, study, and research. According to Dworkin, the purpose of all legal interpretation is to "constructively interpret" or "create the finest possible example of the form or genre to which it is taken to belong" the social practice of law.
Learn more about decision making Visit: brainly.com/question/1249089
#SPJ4
Correct Question:
_____ is a form of subjective decision making that begins when a victim or witness decides whether or not to report a crime to the police.
if the test particle is replaced by a negatively charged test particle, is it in a stable or unstable equilibrium at that location?
Regardless of dimension, the test particle is in a steady state of equilibrium. When an object is in its lowest energy state, stable equilibrium exists.
When additional energy must be added before the object can achieve true steady, metastable equilibrium exists; and when no additional energy is required before reaching either stability or metastability, unstable equilibrium exists. a situation in which even a tiny disturbance could result in significant changes. When a body experiences an external force yet does not immediately return to its initial position, this is referred to as an unstable equilibrium. The solution is said to be asymptotically stable if the difference between the solutions decreases as x rises.
To learn more about equilibrium, click here.
https://brainly.com/question/28527601
#SPJ4
As the Founders debated whether to have a more centralized or diffuse national government, Federalist No. 2 argued for a union among the states under _____________________________.
Federalist No. 2 argued for a union among the states under a strong centralized national government.
Hamilton, Jay, and Madison contended in the Federalist Papers that the Articles of Confederation's devolution of authority prohibited the new nation from growing powerful enough to compete on the international stage or to repress domestic insurgencies like Shays' Rebellion.
On October 31, 1787, Jay wrote Federalist No. 2, titled "Concerning Dangers From Foreign Force and Influence," as the first of five articles in which he discusses the merits of a unified government versus separate sovereignties.
The Federalists advocated for a consolidated national government with strong budgetary underpinnings. Furthermore, the Federalists believed that the Constitution was subject to interpretation.
For more questions on Federalist No. 2
https://brainly.com/question/28228998
#SPJ4
would it be legal for you to give a quitclaim deed for the statue of liberty to your friend?
No, it would not be lawful for me to offer my buddy a quitclaim deed to the Statue of Liberty. The United States government owns the Statue of Liberty, which is a national monument.
It does not belong to anybody and cannot be transferred or sold. Any effort to transfer ownership of the Statue of Liberty by a quitclaim deed or other means would be unlawful and would have no legal impact. No, it would not be lawful for me to offer my buddy a quitclaim deed to the Statue of Liberty. The United States government owns the Statue of Liberty, which is a national monument. it would not be lawful for me to offer my buddy a quitclaim deed to the Statue of Liberty. It does not belong to anybody and cannot be transferred or sold. Any effort to transfer ownership of the Statue of Liberty by a quitclaim deed or other means would be unlawful and would have no legal impact.
learn more about government here:
https://brainly.com/question/16940043
#SPJ4
where is the best practice to test theory for the probable cause of the incident?
Note that the best practice to test a theory for the probable cause of an incident is to conduct a thorough investigation using a systematic and scientific approach.
What is probable cause?Probable cause is the criterion by which police authorities have grounds to seek a warrant for arresting a suspected criminal or issuing a search warrant in the United States.
For likely causation, there is no commonly agreed concept or formulation.
A comprehensive investigation employing a systematic and scientific approach is the best technique for testing a theory regarding the probable cause of an occurrence. Gathering and analyzing data, interviewing witnesses, recreating the occurrence, and reviewing physical evidence are all examples of what this entails. The investigation's purpose should be to remove probable reasons until just the most likely one remains.
Learn more about Probable Cause:
https://brainly.com/question/29617865
#SPJ1
If buyers inspect the public records before purchasing property and see that the property has a lien against it, the buyers have.
If buyers inspect the public records before purchasing property and see that the property has a lien against it, the buyers have actual notice.
An individual has real notice, or direct knowledge, of the information if they have looked through the public records and examined the property. The legal presumption that information is available and that someone can receive it by making a sincere effort to learn more is referred to as constructive notice.
You can undoubtedly be protected from developers' dishonest tactics by exercising caution and being informed of your rights. It is advised to physically examine all of the papers before completing a purchase because there is still a lack of openness in the real estate market despite the numerous limitations that have been put in place over the previous five years. In order to guide you through this difficult process, it is also strongly advised that you hire a lawyer.
To know more about constructive notice, refer to the following link:
https://brainly.com/question/14974267
#SPJ4
Kim was accused of securities fraud. During the government investigation, Kim destroyed relevantdocuments. Under 2002 federal legislation, Kim: A. may be civilly but not criminally liable for the destruction of documents. B. may face fines but not prison for the destruction of documents. C. may face fines and a maximum of twenty years in prison. D. may be considered a 'whistleblower.
C. may face fines and a maximum of twenty years in prison.
Destruction of relevant documents during a government investigation into securities fraud is considered as obstructing justice, which is a criminal offense under federal law. In 2002, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act was enacted to strengthen corporate accountability and protect investors. This act made it a crime to alter, destroy, mutilate, conceal, cover up, falsify or make a false entry in any record, document or tangible object with the intent to obstruct a federal investigation. The penalties for obstructing justice can be severe, so it is important to seek the advice of a qualified criminal defense attorney if facing a government investigation in prison.
Learn more about prison here:
https://brainly.com/question/30267061
#SPJ4
The single most important legislation that has shaped the federal government's approach to controlled substances was:
A) alcohol prohibition (the 18th Amendment).
B) the Pure Food and Drugs Act.
C) the Marijuana Tax Act.
D) the Dangerous Drugs Act.
Many lessor crimes do not require a grand jury, but the individual is nonetheless formally charged via a(n) ______ information
Many lessor crimes do not require a grand jury, but the individual is nonetheless formally charged via indictment.
Which type of listing agreement protects the listing agent the most, regardless of who later sells the property?
A. Exclusive Right to Sell
B. Exclusive Agent
C. Net
D. Open
The correct option is A. Exclusive Right to Sell is the type of listing agreement protects the listing agent the most, regardless of who later sells the property
A listing agreement is a contract between a property owner and a real estate agent that outlines the terms of their working relationship.
There are several different types of listing agreements, each with its own benefits and limitations. In terms of protecting the listing agent, the Exclusive Right to Sell agreement is typically considered the most protective.
Exclusive Right to Sell agreements provide the listing agent with the exclusive right to sell the property during the term of the agreement. This means that regardless of who later sells the property, the listing agent will receive a commission for their services.
This type of agreement offers the most protection for the listing agent, as it ensures that they will be compensated for their efforts, regardless of the outcome.
Exclusive Agent agreements, on the other hand, provide the listing agent with the right to sell the property, but the property owner retains the right to sell the property themselves. In this type of agreement, the listing agent would only receive a commission if they were the ones who sold the property.
Net and Open agreements are less protective for the listing agent, as they do not provide the agent with an exclusive right to sell the property. In these types of agreements, the listing agent may receive a reduced commission or no commission at all if someone else sells the property.
To learn more about listing agreement refer here
https://brainly.com/question/28918177#
#SPJ11
which describes the necessity for a hospital to follow its own medical staff policy bylaws?
Medical staff policy bylaws serve as a fundamental guide for a hospital to ensure the provision of safe, high-quality medical care. The necessity for a hospital to follow its own medical staff policy bylaws is essential to maintain the hospital's integrity and reputation.
These bylaws outline the responsibilities, privileges, and qualifications of the hospital's medical staff and provide a framework for ensuring the provision of safe and efficient medical care to patients.
Adherence to the medical staff policy bylaws helps to maintain the hospital's accreditation, licensing, and regulatory compliance. The bylaws also help to ensure that the hospital's medical staff is competent, qualified, and capable of providing medical care that meets the standards of the medical profession.
To know more about medical staff policy refers to-
brainly.com/question/5817113#
#SPJ11
congressional hearings determined that the use of mechanical power hammers is very dangerous to the persons using them and to persons in the vicinity of the persons using them. as a result, congress enacted a statute prohibiting the use of mechanical power hammers on all construction projects in the united states. subsequently, a study conducted by a private research firm concluded that nails driven by mechanical power hammers have longer-lasting joining power than hand-driven nails. after learning about this study, a city council enacted an amendment to its building safety code requiring the use of mechanical power hammers in the construction of all buildings intended for human habitation.
Option B is Correct. Because it clashes with the terms of the federal act, this change to the city's construction code is unconstitutional.
A law that Congress passed forbade the use of mechanical power hammers in all American construction projects. Following this, a study carried out by a private research firm came to the conclusion that mechanical power hammer-driven nails had longer-lasting joining power than hand-driven nails.
The city of Green amended its building code after learning about this study, mandating the use of mechanical power hammers in the construction of all structures. According to The Federalist #78, in the event that a law passed by Congress disagrees with the Constitution, "the Constitution ought to be preferred to the legislation, the intention of the people to their."
Learn more about Congress Visit: brainly.com/question/491441
#SPJ4
Correct Question:
Congress enacted a statute prohibiting the use of mechanical power hammers on all construction projects in the U.S. Subsequently, a study conducted by a private research firm concluded that nails driven by mechanical power hammers have longer-lasting joining power than hand-driven nails. After learning about this study, the city of Green enacted an amendment to its building code requiring the use of mechanical power hammers in the construction of all buildings. This amendment to the city's building code is
A. unconstitutional, because it was enacted subsequent to the federal statute
B. unconstitutional, because it conflicts with the provisions of the federal statute
C. constitutional, because the federal statute does not expressly indicate that it supersedes inconsistent state and local laws
D. constitutional, because the long-term safety justifies some additional risk to the people engaged in the construction of the buildings
In the space below, rewrite the following statement. Your goal is to eliminate all unnecessary words:
At the time when the parties entered into the agreement of purchase and sale it is important to note that neither of them had knowledge of contents of the dresser drawer. Because of the fact that previous to the contract the seller did not own the dresser and the seller’s mother had not had many valuable pieces of jewelry despite having a large income, the seller had made the assumption that the dresser did not contain anything. Due to the fact that the seller had made a statement to the buyer of the fact that his mother did not own any jewelry in the buyer’s thinking, he had no purpose to make any further investigation or inspection of the drawers as he might otherwise have considered making. For these reasons, there was no provision in the contract for an upward modification in the payment to be made by the buyer to the seller in the event that the dresser drawer later proved to be filled with jewels.
Answer:
The parties entered into an agreement of purchase and sale without knowledge of the contents of the dresser drawer. The seller did not own the dresser, and the seller's mother did not have valuable jewelry, so the seller assumed the dresser was empty. The buyer did not investigate the drawers because the seller stated the dresser contained no jewelry. Therefore, the contract did not include an upward modification of payment in case the dresser drawer contained jewels.
a scenario in which a police officer attempts to coerce money from a criminal is?
A scenario in which a police officer attempts to coerce money from a criminal is an example of police corruption or police bribery.
This is a serious breach of ethical and legal standards, as it undermines the integrity of law enforcement and the justice system. In this scenario, the police officer is using their position of power to extort money from a criminal, which is illegal and unethical.
Police corruption can take many forms, including accepting bribes, soliciting bribes, or using excessive force.
It can have serious consequences for the individuals involved and can erode public trust in law enforcement.
In such cases, it is important to report the misconduct to the appropriate authorities, such as an internal affairs department, so that the situation can be investigated and appropriate action taken.
This helps to maintain the integrity of the police force and uphold the rule of law.
Read more about police corruption
https://brainly.com/question/10445992?#
#SPJ11
. if tracking employees through technology is not illegal, why should megan be concerned if she is not involved in any misconduct? reddit
If tracking employees through technology is not illegal, Megan should be concerned even if she is not involved in any misconduct because - It can still be the basis for a lawsuit.
Few more reasons for Megan's concern would be -
1- employee may lose loyalty
2- tracking employee out-side office hours
3- can be labeled as spying
4- company misuses the inform-ation.
Megan should be concern-ed regarding the tracking of her empl-oyees with the help of techno-logy even if she is not involved in any mis-conduct beca-use employers should not be worried regard-ing the personal life of its emp-loyees.
To know more about Megan click below:
brainly.com/question/14548354
#SPJ4
