The legal doctrine that requires justices to follow precedents set before them is called "stare decisis."
Stare decisis is a Latin term that translates to "to stand by things decided." It is a legal doctrine that emphasizes the importance of consistency and stability in the law by requiring judges to adhere to and apply the legal principles established in previous court decisions. Under this doctrine, judges are bound to follow the precedents set by higher courts within the same jurisdiction.
Stare decisis promotes predictability and certainty in the legal system, ensuring that similar cases are treated similarly and providing guidance for future decisions. It is based on the principle that legal principles and interpretations should be relatively stable unless there are compelling reasons to depart from them. While judges have some discretion to distinguish or overrule precedents
To learn more about legal doctrine click here : brainly.com/question/30803315
#SPJ11
What term refers to evidence that exonerates or diminishes the defendants liability?
For the most part, changes in insanity law can result from the public's reaction to high-profile criminal cases involving individuals who are deemed legally insane. These cases often draw significant media attention and public scrutiny, leading to debates and discussions about the appropriate treatment and legal consequences for individuals with mental illnesses who commit crimes.
When a high-profile case involving an individual with a mental illness emerges, it can influence public perception, shape public opinion, and spark calls for changes in insanity laws. Public reactions to such cases can vary, ranging from demands for stricter accountability and harsher penalties to calls for improved mental health care, treatment, and rehabilitation.
The public's reaction to these cases can influence policymakers, legislators, and legal experts to reevaluate and potentially modify existing insanity laws. Public sentiment and perceptions of fairness, justice, and public safety play a significant role in shaping the legal framework surrounding insanity defense and the treatment of mentally ill individuals within the criminal justice system.
It's important to note that changes in insanity laws can also be influenced by expert opinions, scientific advancements in the field of mental health, legal precedents, and constitutional considerations. However, public opinion and societal attitudes often play a significant role in shaping the discourse and eventual changes in insanity laws.
To know more about rehabilitation refer here
https://brainly.com/question/1184060#
#SPJ11
_____ occurs when a copyright owner can prove that she has legal ownership of the work in question and that the infringer copied the work without permission.
The term that describes the situation when a copyright owner can demonstrate legal ownership of a work and prove that the infringer copied the work without permission is known as infringement.
Infringement refers to the violation of copyright laws by reproducing, distributing, displaying, or performing a copyrighted work .To establish infringement, the copyright owner must demonstrate two key elements: legal ownership of the work and evidence that the infringer copied the work without permission.
Legal ownership is established by showing that the copyright owner has the exclusive rights to the work, typically through registration or other forms of proof. If these elements are successfully demonstrated, the copyright owner can take legal action against the infringer and seek remedies for the infringement.
To learn more about infringer click here : brainly.com/question/28903422
#SPJ11
TRUE / FALSE. political interest groups tend to arise inevitably out of natural social processes
False. Political interest groups do not necessarily arise inevitably out of natural social processes. While interest groups can emerge as a result of social and political dynamics,
Their formation is not an automatic or inevitable outcome. Interest groups are typically organized entities that represent specific interests, causes, or ideologies. They are often formed through deliberate efforts by individuals or organizations seeking to advance their particular agenda or advocate for specific policy changes.
These groups mobilize resources, such as funding, membership, and expertise, to influence the political process and shape public policy. While societal issues and concerns may contribute to the formation of interest groups, their existence and growth are driven by purposeful actions and strategic initiatives rather than being an inherent or automatic result of social processes.
Learn more about organization here : brainly.com/question/28545068
#SPJ11
dennis and eve want to form and do business as a corporation—farm-2-fork inc. this corporation will be recognized under the law as
Dennis and Eve plan to create and operate as a company, which the law will recognize as an Artificial legal person. Thus, the correct answer to the statement is option (c).
Law recognizes the creation of a corporation as an artificial entity with legal standing, rights, and duties. This indicates that the firm and its shareholders are viewed as distinct entities.
At least one shareholder owns it, and at least one director is in charge of it. The corporation enjoys perpetual succession as a result of its own legal identity. The demise, incapacity, insolvency, or dissension of a shareholder has no impact on the firm.Therefore, Dennis and Eve plan to create and operate as a company, which the law will recognize as an Artificial legal person. Thus, the correct answer to the statement is option (c).
Learn more about Artificial legal person here,
https://brainly.com/question/32149300
#SPJ12
The given question is incomplete, the complete question is:
Dennis and Eve want to form and do business as a corporation—Farm-2-Fork Inc. A corporation is
a.) a natural being.
b.) a tangible thing.
c.) an artificial legal person.
d.) a non-entity.
Which one of these is a type of public facility for juveniles? training schools b) ranches and camps c) adult prisons d) all of the above-is right answer.
The types of public facilities for juveniles are training schools, ranches and camps and adult prisons. The correct option is d.
Around 100 years ago, the United States established a separate juvenile justice system with the goal of diverting young offenders away from the harsh punishments of criminal courts and encouraging recovery based on the needs of the individual juvenile. This system was to be distinct from adult or criminal court in several ways. The emphasis was to be on the child or adolescent as a person in need of assistance, rather than on the act that brought him or her before the court.
The proceedings were informal, with the juvenile court judge exercising considerable discretion.
Learn more about juvenile, here:
https://brainly.com/question/21931423
#SPJ1
the defendant exercises choice in the court process in which of the following decisions?
The defendant exercises choice in the court process in decisions such as whether to plead guilty or not guilty, whether to request a trial by jury or judge, and whether to testify or remain silent during the trial.
In the court process, the defendant holds the power to make crucial decisions. One of the most significant choices is whether to plead guilty or not guilty. This decision shapes the subsequent course of the trial. By pleading guilty, the defendant accepts responsibility for the alleged offense and waives the right to a trial.
Conversely, by pleading not guilty, the defendant maintains their innocence and proceeds to trial, where they have the opportunity to present evidence and challenge the prosecution's case.
Other choices that the defendant may have involvement in include decisions regarding legal representation, whether to testify in their defense, and potential plea bargains negotiated with the prosecution, but the initial choice of pleading guilty or not guilty is the primary decision that sets the tone for the court process.
The answer is general as no options are provided.
Learn more about defendant: https://brainly.com/question/31194442
#SPJ11
TRUE / FALSE. examples of actions that illustrate compliance with policies are known as laws.
The given statement "examples of actions that illustrate compliance with policies are known as laws." is false as these are not known as laws.
Laws are legally binding regulations that are enacted by a governing body and have repercussions for violations. They are typically passed at the federal or state level and apply to everyone who resides in the jurisdiction. Generally speaking, laws cover a wider range of social issues, including criminal behavior, property rights, contracts, and regulations.
Contrarily, policies are specific rules or guidelines set forth by institutions, organizations, or governments to control behavior or actions within a given context. They are frequently created to accomplish particular goals, control internal processes or offer direction on particular problems. Adhering to the regulations and instructions outlined in those policies is referred to as compliance with those policies.
Learn more about policies at:
brainly.com/question/15362232
#SPJ4
a blended sentence is a juvenile court disposition that imposes both a juvenile sanction and an adult criminal sentence upon an adjudicated delinquent.
Actually, a blended sentence refers to a legal concept that combines both juvenile and adult dispositions for a young offender who has been adjudicated delinquent.
Under a blended sentence, the court imposes both a juvenile sanction, such as placement in a juvenile facility or probation, and an adult criminal sentence, such as imprisonment or probation with adult supervision. The purpose is to provide a balance between holding the juvenile accountable for their actions while still considering their age and potential for rehabilitation.
For more information on blended sentence visit: brainly.com/question/32179067
#SPJ11
Which of the following is not a factor considered in the decision to grant bail?a. If the person is a flight riskb. The person's previous criminal recordc. The person's ties to the communityd. The desire to punish the offender
The factor that is not considered in the decision to grant bail is Option d. The desire to punish the offender.
Bail decisions are primarily focused on ensuring the defendant's appearance in court while protecting the safety of the community, rather than on punishment.
When deciding whether to grant bail, courts consider several factors. The first factor, "a. If the person is a flight risk," assesses the likelihood of the defendant fleeing or not appearing in court. This involves evaluating the individual's ties to the community, employment status, financial resources, and previous history of failing to appear in court.
The second factor, "b. The person's previous criminal record," is also considered. The court looks at the defendant's past convictions, pending charges, and any history of not abiding by court orders. This information helps determine the risk of the defendant committing further offenses while out on bail.
The third factor, "c. The person's ties to the community," examines the defendant's connections to the local community, such as family, employment, and length of residency. These ties can act as incentives for the defendant to remain in the area and appear in court.
However, the desire to punish the offender is not a factor in the bail decision-making process. Bail is meant to secure the defendant's presence at future court proceedings, and the question of guilt or punishment is addressed during the trial or sentencing phase. Bail decisions focus on the likelihood of flight risk and ensuring public safety, rather than punishing the accused. Therefore the correct option is D
Know more about Bail here:
https://brainly.com/question/31388293
#SPJ11
________ programs suggest that offenders must understand the victim's attitudes, experiences, and impact that the offender's actions had upon the victim.
Restorative justice programs suggest that offenders must understand the victim's attitudes, experiences, and the impact that the offender's actions had upon the victim.
Restorative justice is a philosophical approach to justice that focuses on repairing the harm caused by crime rather than solely punishing the offender. It emphasizes active participation from all stakeholders, including the victim, offender, and the community. In restorative justice programs, one of the key principles is the recognition of the victim's perspective and the understanding of how the offender's actions affected them. This involves creating opportunities for dialogue, empathy, and accountability, where offenders have the chance to listen to the victim's experiences, acknowledge the harm caused, and take responsibility for their actions. By doing so, restorative justice aims to foster healing, promote offender reintegration, and address the needs of the victim in the process.
To know more about restorative justice programs, click here: brainly.com/question/28901964
#SPJ11
one of the most powerful legislative tools of the texas governor is
One of the most powerful legislative tools of the Texas governor is the veto power.
The governor of Texas has the authority to veto bills passed by the state legislature, which means they can reject proposed legislation and prevent it from becoming law. The veto power of the Texas governor serves as a significant check on the legislative process. If the governor disagrees with a bill or believes it is not in the best interest of the state, they can exercise their veto power to block its enactment.
This gives the governor substantial influence over the legislative agenda and the ability to shape public policy. There are two types of vetoes available to the Texas governor: regular veto and line-item veto. A regular veto applies to an entire bill, meaning the governor rejects the entire piece of legislation.
A line-item veto, on the other hand, allows the governor to selectively veto specific provisions or appropriations within a bill while approving the rest. This line-item veto power gives the governor the ability to eliminate or modify specific provisions of the budget, providing them with significant control over state spending.
know more about legislative here:
https://brainly.com/question/27893557
#SPJ11
TRUE / FALSE. epidemic in which the infectious agent came from a single source and all victims were exposed to that source, at approximately the same time.
The given statement "epidemic in which the infectious agent came from a single source and all victims were exposed to that source, at approximately the same time." is true as this is known as point sourcing epidemic.
A point source epidemic is a contagious disease outbreak where the infection's origin can be identified as one specific place or incident. All affected people in this kind of epidemic are typically exposed to the infectious agent from the same source within a short amount of time. This might happen, for instance, if a number of people eat or drink contaminated food or water at a particular gathering or location.
A point source epidemic is defined by a sharp rise in cases over a relatively short period of time. The number of new cases typically declines after the infection's source is located and the appropriate control measures are put in place.
Learn more about epidemic at:
brainly.com/question/20608124
#SPJ4
Courts of limited jurisdiction are most likely to handle which of the following crimes?
a.Homicides
b.Rapes
c.Robbery
d.Traffic violations
Answer:
Answer: d. Traffic violations
The term "jurisdiction" refers to the powers and authority that a court has to hear and decide cases. It is used to refer to a court's geographic and subject matter authority
The courts of limited jurisdiction are the ones that hear cases involving minor offenses such as traffic violations and other misdemeanors. Crimes that are most likely to be handled by courts of limited jurisdiction are traffic violations. Hence, option D is the correct answer.Option A (Homicides), B (Rapes), and C (Robbery) are serious offenses that are generally handled by courts of general jurisdiction. They are crimes that are beyond the jurisdiction of the limited jurisdiction courts. Courts of general jurisdiction are responsible for handling felony cases, which are more serious crimes.
to know more about jurisdiction, visit
https://brainly.com/question/10377896
#SPJ11
when presented with a lineup gary was able to identify the perpetrator of the robbery he had witnessed
The scenario described is an illustration of confirmation bias.
Confirmation bias refers to the tendency to search for, interpret, and remember information in a way that confirms one's preexisting beliefs or hypotheses. In this case, gary was initially unsure about her identification of the perpetrator.
However, when the investigator mentioned that another witness had chosen the same suspect, Gary's confidence in her memory and identification grew close to 100%. This indicates that Gary 's confidence was influenced by the confirmation of her initial belief through the agreement of another witness.
Gary selectively focused on and interpreted the information that supported his identification, disregarding any doubts or alternative possibilities. This cognitive bias can lead to errors in judgment and decision-making, as it hinders a balanced and objective evaluation of the available evidence.
To know more about confirmation bias, refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/30404177#
#SPJ11
COMPLETE QUESTION:
When presented with a lineup, Gary was able to identify the perpetrator of a robbery he had witnessed. He was not sure of her identification at first, but when the investigator mentioned that another witness had also chosen the same suspect, his confidence that he remembered the perpetrator well grew close to 100%. This is an illustration of:
based on the infographic, which of the following strategies would a group seeking to increase turnout likely pursue?
Based on the infographic, a group seeking to increase turnout would likely pursue the following strategies:
Voter Education and Outreach: To increase turnout, the group would focus on educating and engaging potential voters. This could involve creating informational materials, such as brochures or online resources, that provide clear and accessible information about the importance of voting, the electoral process, and key issues at stake. They may also conduct outreach campaigns through various channels, including social media, community events, and partnerships with local organizations. The goal is to raise awareness and empower individuals with the knowledge they need to make informed decisions and participate in the electoral process.Mobilization and Voter Registration: The group would prioritize mobilizing individuals to register and vote. They might establish voter registration drives, both in-person and online, to make it easier for eligible individuals to register. Additionally, they could employ targeted outreach efforts to specific demographics or communities that have historically faced barriers to voting. This could involve partnering with community leaders, conducting door-to-door canvassing, or utilizing technology to reach potential voters. The group's aim would be to remove obstacles and actively encourage people to exercise their right to vote, making it convenient and accessible for everyone.Learn more about voting here : brainly.com/question/21093353
#SPJ11
TRUE / FALSE. unilateral termination of an agency agreement can lead to damages if the termination was made without a justifiable cause.
True. Unilateral termination of an agency agreement can lead to damages if the termination is made without a justifiable cause.
Explanation: An agency agreement is a legal contract between two parties, where one party (the agent) is authorized to act on behalf of the other party (the principal) in conducting certain business activities.
If the principal unilaterally terminates the agency agreement without a valid or justifiable cause, it can be considered a breach of contract. In such situations, the terminated agent may suffer financial harm, including lost commissions, business opportunities, or investments made in connection with the agency relationship.
When an agency agreement is wrongfully terminated, the aggrieved party (the agent) may have the right to seek damages through legal recourse. The exact remedies and the amount of damages will depend on the specific terms of the agency agreement and the applicable laws in the jurisdiction.
Generally, the damages awarded aim to compensate the agent for the losses they incurred as a result of the premature termination, including any foreseeable or direct financial harm caused by the unjustified termination. However, it's important to consult with a legal professional familiar with contract and agency law to understand the specific rights and remedies available in a given situation.
Learn more about agreement here: brainly.com/question/24225827
#SPJ11
regarding domestic law, an important challenge for lawmakers is
One important challenge for lawmakers in domestic law is navigating the complex and evolving nature of societal needs and expectations. As society progresses and changes, lawmakers must ensure that laws adequately address emerging issues and protect the rights and well-being of individuals.
In order to address this challenge, lawmakers need to engage in thorough research and analysis to identify emerging issues and anticipate future challenges. They must stay informed about societal trends, technological advancements, and global developments that may impact domestic law. This involves actively seeking input from experts, stakeholders, and the general public through consultations and public hearings. By incorporating diverse perspectives and expertise, lawmakers can better understand the complexities of various issues and make informed decisions.
Furthermore, lawmakers must possess the ability to adapt and revise existing laws to ensure they remain relevant and effective. They need to be open to revisiting and amending legislation as societal needs and expectations evolve. This requires a willingness to learn from past experiences, evaluate the impact of existing laws, and make necessary adjustments. Regular evaluation and revision of laws help ensure they are responsive to changing circumstances and continue to serve their intended purposes.
Overall, the challenge for lawmakers in domestic law lies in navigating the dynamic nature of society and creating laws that effectively address emerging issues. By staying informed, engaging with stakeholders, and being open to revision, lawmakers can strive to create a legal framework that is adaptable and responsive to the needs of society.
Learn more about domestic law here : brainly.com/question/32279425
#SPJ11
A woman is filmed swimming in a backyard pool in a revealing bikini. When determining if she can sue, the court would considera. if the woman had a reasonable expectation of privacyb. if the woman could be easily observed from the surrounding area such as a public sidewalk.c. the size, location, and layout of the fence around the backyard.d. all of the answers are correct.
When determining if a woman can sue for being filmed swimming in a revealing bikini in a backyard pool, the court would consider all of the answers. So the option d. is correct.
In cases involving privacy violations, courts consider multiple factors to determine if the individual's privacy rights were violated. One crucial factor is whether the person had a reasonable expectation of privacy. If the woman believed that she would not be easily observed while swimming in a backyard pool, she may argue that she had a reasonable expectation of privacy.
Additionally, the court would consider if the woman could be easily observed from the surrounding area, such as a public sidewalk. If the pool area is visible from public spaces without any obstructions, it could impact the woman's privacy claim.
Furthermore, the size, location, and layout of the fence around the backyard would be taken into account. A well-constructed fence that obstructs the view from outside the property may strengthen the woman's argument for privacy. Ultimately, in determining whether the woman can sue for the filming incident, the court would assess all of these factors to evaluate if her privacy rights were violated.
To learn more about individual's privacy rights click here
brainly.com/question/1189272
#SPJ11
in order for the supreme court to hear oral arguments or decide a case on the written record
In order for the Supreme Court to hear oral arguments or decide a case based on the written record, the case must go through a process known as "granting certiorari," where the Court agrees to review the case.
The Supreme Court receives numerous requests for review each year, but it has limited capacity to hear oral arguments and decide cases. To determine which cases to review, the Court uses a process called "granting certiorari" or "granting cert." This process involves a thorough evaluation of the legal issues and considerations involved in the case.
Typically, a party seeking review by the Supreme Court files a petition for a writ of certiorari, which outlines the reasons why the Court should hear the case. The Court's law clerks and justices review the petition, the responses from the opposing parties, and the relevant lower court decisions.
They assess the legal significance of the case, its potential impact, and any conflicts among lower courts on the issue.If at least four justices agree to hear the case, the Court grants certiorari, and the case proceeds to the next stage
To learn more about Supreme Court click here :
brainly.com/question/29759733
#SPJ11
the president has several after-the-fact means of holding the bureaucracy accountable including budget authority, regulation approval, and:
In addition to budget authority and regulation approval, the president has another after-the-fact means of holding the bureaucracy accountable, which is oversight and investigation powers.
The president possesses oversight and investigation powers as a means of holding the bureaucracy accountable. This authority allows the president to review and scrutinize the actions and performance of executive branch agencies and departments. Through oversight and investigation, the president can assess whether the bureaucracy is operating efficiently, effectively, and in alignment with the administration's goals and policies.
These powers can be utilized to identify any potential wrongdoing, inefficiencies, or areas for improvement within the bureaucracy. By conducting investigations and holding agencies accountable for their actions, the president can take corrective measures, implement reforms, or even initiate disciplinary actions as necessary.
Learn more about bureaucracy here : brainly.com/question/30288225
#SPJ11
discovery occurs before trial and involves identifying and locating books, documents, or other tangible things and persons relating to the subject matter at issue. true false
The given statement "discovery occurs before trial and involves identifying and locating books, documents, or other tangible things and persons relating to the subject matter at issue." is true as discovery is a pre-trial process in legal proceedings.
During the pre trial phase of a lawsuit known as discovery, the parties exchange pertinent information and evidence. It entails identifying and locating books, papers, tangible objects and people who are connected to the topic at hand.
Each party can gather information during discovery, evaluate the merits of their position, and obtain evidence that can be used at trial. By giving parties access to pertinent information and preventing surprises during trial, it promotes fairness and transparency in the legal system.
Learn more about lawsuit at:
brainly.com/question/30392587
#SPJ4
Which of the following is NOT considered a model of juvenile justice classifying?A) centralized statesB) decentralized statesC) combination statesD) e-combination states
E-combination states are not considered a model of juvenile justice classifying.
Here correct option is D.
The commonly recognized models of juvenile justice classification are:
A) Centralized states: These states have a centralized authority responsible for making decisions regarding the handling of juvenile offenders. They typically emphasize uniformity and consistency in the application of juvenile justice policies and practices.
B) Decentralized states: These states distribute decision-making authority among various local jurisdictions or agencies. Each jurisdiction may have its own approach and discretion in handling juvenile offenders.
C) Combination states: These states employ a combination of centralized and decentralized elements in their juvenile justice systems. They may have a central authority overseeing certain aspects while allowing local jurisdictions some degree of autonomy.
Know more about juvenile justice here
https://brainly.com/question/32067557#
#SPJ11
in determining whether an agreement qualifies as a legally enforceable contract, courts of law normally will not inquire into the __________ of consideration.
In determining whether an agreement qualifies as a legally enforceable contract, courts of law normally will not inquire into the adequacy of consideration.
Consideration is a fundamental element of a contract, referring to the exchange of something of value between the parties involved. It is typically required for a contract to be considered legally enforceable. However, courts generally do not inquire into the adequacy of consideration, meaning they do not assess whether the value exchanged is fair or reasonable.
The rationale behind this approach is rooted in the principle of freedom of contract. Parties are generally presumed to have the autonomy and capacity to negotiate and agree on the terms that suit their interests. As long as there is some form of consideration, even if it may be minimal or subjective, courts do not inquire into the fairness or adequacy of the exchange. This non-inquiry into the adequacy of consideration helps maintain efficiency and effectiveness in contract law. It allows parties to freely enter into agreements without undue interference or second-guessing by the courts. By focusing on the existence of consideration rather than its value, the courts uphold the principle of freedom of contract and ensure a more predictable and stable environment for contractual relationships.
Learn more about Law : brainly.com/question/31340061
#SPJ11
If one of the wrongdoers in an illegal contract is unjustly enriched at the expense of the other, the courts are usually not concerned. True or false
False. In cases where one party in an illegal contract is unjustly enriched at the expense of the other, the courts may still be concerned and take action. While illegal contracts are generally unenforceable, the principle of unjust enrichment focuses on preventing one party from benefiting unfairly at the expense of another.
The courts may intervene to ensure that the unjustly enriched party does not retain the benefits obtained through the illegal contract. They may order restitution or impose remedies to restore the disadvantaged party to their rightful position and prevent the wrongdoer from profiting from their wrongdoing.
The principle of unjust enrichment recognizes that it is unjust for one party to retain benefits obtained through an illegal contract. Even though the contract itself may be unenforceable due to its illegality, the courts aim to prevent unjust enrichment and promote fairness between the parties involved. The specific legal remedies available will depend on the jurisdiction and the circumstances of the case. However, it is not accurate to claim that the courts are usually unconcerned when one party is unjustly enriched in an illegal contract.
Learn more about contract here : brainly.com/question/32254040
#SPJ11
the majority of bias-motivated incidents reported by law enforcement agencies were motivated by a/an ______ bias
what is the length of the free look period when a medicare supplement insurance policy is replaced?
The length of the free look period when a Medicare supplement insurance policy is replaced can vary depending on the insurance company and state regulations.
However, the standard free look period is typically 30 days. During this period, policyholders have the right to review their new Medicare supplement insurance policy and decide whether to keep it or cancel it without penalty. If they choose to cancel the policy within the free look period, they are entitled to a full refund of any premiums paid.
The free look period is an important consumer protection measure that gives individuals the opportunity to thoroughly evaluate their new policy and ensure it meets their needs and expectations. It allows policyholders to compare the benefits, coverage, and costs of the new policy with their existing coverage. If they find that the new policy does not provide the desired benefits or if they are not satisfied with the terms and conditions, they can cancel it and return to their previous coverage or explore other options. It is essential for individuals to carefully read and understand the terms of their new Medicare supplement insurance policy during the free look period to make an informed decision about its suitability for their healthcare needs.
The specific length of the free look period can vary depending on the insurance company and state regulations. While 30 days is the standard duration, it is advisable to carefully review the terms of the policy and consult with the insurance provider to determine the exact length of the free look period in a particular case. This will ensure that policyholders have sufficient time to make an informed decision about their Medicare supplement insurance coverage.
Learn more about insurance here : brainly.com/question/27822778
#SPJ11
FILL THE BLANK. in the early days of the great depression, many countries ______ tariffs in an effort to protect their domestic industries and employment, but the effort failed
In the early days of the Great Depression, many countries implemented tariffs in an effort to protect their domestic industries and employment, but the effort failed.
This policy is known as protectionism and is often used during times of economic downturns. However, instead of boosting domestic production and employment, the tariffs led to a decrease in international trade, which further worsened the global economic situation.
The implementation of tariffs by many countries resulted in a trade war, which saw retaliatory measures from other countries. This further restricted international trade, causing global economic activity to plummet. The Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act of 1930, passed by the United States, is often cited as one of the main culprits for the worsening of the Great Depression.
The act raised tariffs on more than 20,000 imported goods and resulted in other countries raising their tariffs in response. Ultimately, the attempt to protect domestic industries and employment through protectionism failed, worsening the Great Depression.
To know more about Great Depression refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/29771180#
#SPJ11
equity theory is often characterized as a theory of _______ justice
Equity theory is often characterized as a theory of distributive justice.
This theory suggests that individuals will make judgments about the fairness of a situation based on comparisons between their own outcomes and those of others. It postulates that when people feel that their outcomes are relatively equal to those of others in similar situations, they will perceive the situation as fair and just.
People will also be motivated to make adjustments to restore any perceived inequities. Thus, if they feel they are receiving more than others, they will seek to reduce their own outcomes to restore a sense of fairness. Conversely, if they feel they are receiving less than others, they will attempt to increase their own outcomes to restore equity.
know more about Equity theory here
https://brainly.com/question/29555722#
#SPJ11
T/F: mala in se crimes are those crimes that are not morally wrong but are declared wrongful by the legislature.
False. Mala in se crimes are crimes that are considered inherently wrong or morally wrong, regardless of whether they are declared wrongful by the legislature.
The term "mala in se" is Latin for "wrong in itself." These crimes are universally recognized as wrongful due to their nature and are based on fundamental principles of morality and ethics. Examples of mala in se crimes include murder, theft, assault, and fraud.
In contrast, mala prohibita crimes are those that are declared wrongful by the legislature but may not necessarily be inherently morally wrong, such as traffic violations or certain regulatory offenses.
Learn more about regulatory offenses.
https://brainly.com/question/28478883
#SPJ4
a large organization that is responsible for sensitive or critical data may elect to create which of the following to do damage assessment, risk remediation, and legal consultation?
A large organization responsible for sensitive or critical data may elect to create a Computer Security Incident Response Team (CSIRT) to perform damage assessment, risk remediation, and legal consultation.
A Computer Security Incident Response Team (CSIRT) is a specialized group within an organization that is dedicated to handling and responding to computer security incidents. This team is responsible for assessing the damage caused by security incidents, implementing measures to mitigate risks, and providing legal consultation in relation to cybersecurity matters.
The CSIRT plays a crucial role in managing and responding to cybersecurity incidents, such as data breaches, network intrusions, malware attacks, and other security breaches.
To learn more about CSIRT click here : brainly.com/question/31262864
#SPJ11
