The mean number of words per minute (WPM) typed by a speed typist is 149 with a standard deviation of 14 WPM. What is the probability that the sample mean would be greater than 147.8 WPM if 88 speed typists are randomly selected

Answer:

D. 12/18 = 16/24

Step-by-step explanation:

The method we must go about to solve this is finding the constant. For A, we can solve it by doing 10 divided by 8 (which is 1.25) and then 40 divided by 1.25 to see if it is 36. Alternatively, we can do 10 divided by 8 and then 40 divided by 36 to see if the constant is the same. It's up to you!

My answers:

A. No (constant varies)

B. No (constant varies)

C. No (constant varies)

D. Yes! Constant is 0.75

How to solve for D:

12/16 = 0.75

18/0.75 = 24       OR          18/24 = 0.75

I hope this helps! Please don't hesitate to reach out with more questions!

Hello!

10/40 = 8/36 ?

10 × 36 = 40 × 8

360 = 40 × 8

360 ≠ 320 => 10/40 ≠ 8/36

8/18 = 6/16 ?

8 × 16 = 18 × 6

128 = 18 × 6

128 ≠ 108 => 8/18 ≠ 6/16

9/15 = 44/50 ?

9 × 50 = 15 × 44

450 = 15 × 44

450 ≠ 660 => 9/15 ≠ 44/50

12/18 = 16/24 ?

12 × 24 = 18 × 16

288 = 18 × 16

288 = 288 => 12/18 = 16/24

Good luck! :)

Given:

The equation is:

[tex]\ln e^{\ln x}+\ln e^{\ln x^2}=2\ln 8[/tex]

To find:

The solution for the given equation.

Solution:

We have,

[tex]\ln e^{\ln x}+\ln e^{\ln x^2}=2\ln 8[/tex]

It can be written as:

[tex]\ln x+\ln x^2=2\ln 8[/tex]              [tex][\because \ln e^x=x][/tex]

[tex]\ln (x\cdot x^2)=2\ln 8[/tex]              [tex][\because \ln a+\ln b=\ln (ab)][/tex]

[tex]\ln (x^3)=\ln 8^2[/tex]         [tex][\because \ln x^n=n\ln x ][/tex]

On comparing both sides, we get

[tex]x^3=8^2[/tex]

[tex]x^3=64[/tex]

Taking cube root, we get

[tex]x=\sqrt[3]{64}[/tex]

[tex]x=4[/tex]

Therefore, the required solution is [tex]x=4[/tex].

Answer:

x=4

Step-by-step explanation:

What is the true solution to the equation below?

ln e Superscript ln x Baseline + ln e Superscript ln x squared Baseline = 2 ln 8

x = 2

x = 4

x = 8

Answer:

I belive it has no x intercepts

it looks weird, but it can be a function. the x-intercept and the y-intercept can also be found in the table above.

to draw a line that can represent a function with these point, we would need to cross y=0 multiple times, so it will have more then one x-intercept.

option A

key takeaway: just draw stuff you find complicated:)

Answer:

The probability that the mean life expectancy of the sample is less than X years is the p-value of [tex]Z = \frac{X - \mu}{\frac{\sigma}{\sqrt{n}}}[/tex], in which [tex]\mu[/tex] is the mean life expectancy, [tex]\sigma[/tex] is the standard deviation and n is the size of the sample.

Step-by-step explanation:

To solve this question, we need to understand the normal probability distribution and the central limit theorem.

Normal Probability Distribution

Problems of normal distributions can be solved using the z-score formula.

In a set with mean [tex]\mu[/tex] and standard deviation [tex]\sigma[/tex], the z-score of a measure X is given by:

[tex]Z = \frac{X - \mu}{\sigma}[/tex]

The Z-score measures how many standard deviations the measure is from the mean. After finding the Z-score, we look at the z-score table and find the p-value associated with this z-score. This p-value is the probability that the value of the measure is smaller than X, that is, the percentile of X. Subtracting 1 by the p-value, we get the probability that the value of the measure is greater than X.

Central Limit Theorem

The Central Limit Theorem establishes that, for a normally distributed random variable X, with mean [tex]\mu[/tex] and standard deviation [tex]\sigma[/tex], the sampling distribution of the sample means with size n can be approximated to a normal distribution with mean [tex]\mu[/tex] and standard deviation [tex]s = \frac{\sigma}{\sqrt{n}}[/tex].

For a skewed variable, the Central Limit Theorem can also be applied, as long as n is at least 30.

We have:

Mean [tex]\mu[/tex], standard deviation [tex]\sigma[/tex].

Sample of size n:

This means that the z-score is now, by the Central Limit Theorem:

[tex]Z = \frac{X - \mu}{\frac{\sigma}{\sqrt{n}}}[/tex]

Find the probability that the mean life expectancy will be less than years.

The probability that the mean life expectancy of the sample is less than X years is the p-value of [tex]Z = \frac{X - \mu}{\frac{\sigma}{\sqrt{n}}}[/tex], in which [tex]\mu[/tex] is the mean life expectancy, [tex]\sigma[/tex] is the standard deviation and n is the size of the sample.

Actual data table :

X __ y

2 15

6 13

7 9

8 8

12 5

Answer:

0.953

Step-by-step explanation:

The question isnt well formatted :

The actual data:

X __ y

2 15

6 13

7 9

8 8

12 5

Using a correlation Coefficient calculator, the correlation Coefficient obtained by fitting the data is 0.953 which depicts a strong linear correlation between the x and y variable. This shows that the value of y increases with a corresponding increase in x values and vice versa.

9514 1404 393

Answer:

  d = kw/p

Step-by-step explanation:

When d varies directly with w, the equation is ...

  d = kw

When d varies inversely with p, the equation is ...

  d = k/p

When d does both, the equation is ...

  d = kw/p

Answer:

Scott invested $ 3,000 at 12% annually, and $ 2,400 at 8% annually.

Step-by-step explanation:

Since Scott invested a total of $ 5400 at two separate banks, and one bank pays simple interest of 12% per year while the other pays simple interest at a rate of 8% per year, if Scott earned $ 552.00 in interest during a single year, to determine how much did he deposit in each bank, the following calculation must be performed:

5400 x 0.12 + 0 x 0.08 = 648

4400 x 0.12 + 1000 x 0.08 = 608

3000 x 0.12 + 2400 x 0.08 = 552

Therefore, Scott invested $ 3,000 at 12% annually, and $ 2,400 at 8% annually.

Answer: 49 cherry tomatoes.

Step-by-step explanation:

7 x

— = — cross multiply and done.

15 105

Answer:

36/55

Step-by-step explanation:

Total 55 persons, total females 36.

The probability that the selected person is a female from the given table is gotten as; 0.65

From the given table we see that;

Males under 35 years = 8

Females under 35 years = 18

Males 35 years and older = 11

Females 35 years and older = 18

Thus;

Total number of people = 8 + 18 + 11 + 18

Total people = 55

Thus, probability that the selected person is a female is;

P(female) = (18 + 18)/55

P(female) = 36/55

P(female) = 0.65

Read more about Probability at; https://brainly.com/question/251701

9514 1404 393

Answer:

  False

Step-by-step explanation:

f(-2) = (1/2)(-2) -3 = -1 -3 = -4

g(-2) = -2(-2) +2 = 4 +2 = 6

The function values are not the same at x=-2, so the graphs do not intersect there.

__

The graphs intersect at x=2.

Answer:

22

Step-by-step explanation:

3x-14= 4(x-9)

3×-14= 4x-36

4x-36-3x+14=0

×-22÷0

x=22

Answer:

The equation of [tex]f(x) = e^{-3\cdot x}[/tex] by Maclaurin series is [tex]f(x) = \Sigma\limits_{i=0}^{\infty} \frac{(-3\cdot x)^{i}}{i!}[/tex].

Step-by-step explanation:

The Maclaurin series for [tex]f(x)[/tex] is defined by the following formula:

[tex]f(x) = \Sigma\limits_{i = 0}^{\infty} \frac{f^{(i)}(0)}{i!} \cdot x^{i}[/tex] (1)

Where [tex]f^{(i)}[/tex] is the i-th derivative of the function.

If [tex]f(x) = e^{-3\cdot x}[/tex], then the formula of the i-th derivative of the function is:

[tex]f^{(i)} = (-3)^{i}\cdot e^{-3\cdot x}[/tex] (2)

Then,

[tex]f^{(i)}(0) = (-3)^{i}[/tex] (2b)

Lastly, the equation of the trascendental function by Maclaurin series is:

[tex]f(x) = \Sigma\limits_{i=0}^{\infty} \frac{(-3)^{i}\cdot x^{i}}{i!}[/tex]

[tex]f(x) = \Sigma\limits_{i=0}^{\infty} \frac{(-3\cdot x)^{i}}{i!}[/tex] (3)

Answer:

1600N

Step-by-step explanation:

Force = 400 N

Angle with horizontal = 60°

Displacement in horizontal direction = 8 m

work done formula when angle is included: Force * distance * cos(angle)

400 * 8 * cos(60)

= 400 * 8 * 1/2

= 1600N

Answer:

Ang hirap naman niyan bakit kaya lahat na module mahirap

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

the first and last choices look good  

Answer:

{B} travelling costs paid in connection with a temporary work assignment

Answer:

a) Minimize Z =30 X1 +25 X2+18 X3

subject to following constraints

[tex]1.X1\geq 0.4\left ( X1+X2 \right )\\2.X3\geq 0.15\left ( X1+X2+X3 \right )\\3.X1+X2+X3\leq 150\\4.X3\geq 0.25\left ( X1+X2 \right )\\5.X1\leq 50\\6.X1,X2,X3\geq 0[/tex]

b) Total cost=[tex]30 \times 48+15\times72+18\times30[/tex] = $3180.

c) As the dual price for constraint five is zero hence additional work hours for Lisa won't change the optimum solution.

Step-by-step explanation:  

Step 1:-

a)  

Let's take  

X1 to be the number of hours assigned to Lisa  

X2 to be the number of hours assigned to David  

X3 to be the number of hours assigned to Sarah.  

The objective function is to attenuate the entire cost of the project by deciding an optimum number of hours for every person. the target function is given by -  

Minimize Z =30 X1 +25 X2+18 X3

subject to following constraints

[tex]1.X1\geq 0.4\left ( X1+X2 \right )\\2.X3\geq 0.15\left ( X1+X2+X3 \right )\\3.X1+X2+X3\leq 150\\4.X3\geq 0.25\left ( X1+X2 \right )\\5.X1\leq 50\\6.X1,X2,X3\geq 0[/tex]  

Constraints and explanation:  

1. Lisa must be assigned a minimum of 40% of the entire number of hours assigned to the 2 senior designers.  

2. Sarah must be assigned a minimum of 15% of the entire project time.  

3. The corporate estimates that 150 hours are going to be required to finish the project.  

4. The number of hours assigned to Sarah must not exceed 25% of the entire number of hours assigned to the 2 senior designers.  

5. Lisa features a maximum of fifty hours available to figure on this project.  

6. Non-negative condition.  

Step 2:-  

b)

From the above equations, we get  

The number of hours assigned to Lisa is 48 hours  

The number of hours assigned to David 72 hours  

The number of hours assigned to Sarah 30 hours.  

Total cost=[tex]30 \times 48+15\times72+18\times30[/tex] = $3180.  

Step 3:-

c)  

As the dual price for constraint five is zero hence additional work hours for Lisa won't change the optimum solution.

Answer:

[tex] \frac{67}{30} \: \text{or} \:2 \frac{7}{30} [/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

5/6 ÷ 1/3 - 2/3 (2/5)

Hope it helps you! ＼(^ᴥ^)／

Answer:

144

Step-by-step explanation:

To Find :-

Solution :-

We have ,

> 1/8 , 2/9 , 3/12 .

The denominator of the fractions are ,

> 8 , 9 , 12

The LCM of 8,9,12 will be ,

2 | 8 , 9 , 12

2 | 4 , 9 , 6

2 | 2 , 9 , 3

3 | 2 , 3 , 1

Therefore , LCM will be ,

> 2⁴ × 3² = 16 × 9 = 144

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

9514 1404 393

Answer:

  True

Step-by-step explanation:

Your calculator can tell you this is true. Or, you can simplify the given expression:

  [tex]\left(\dfrac{32}{3125}\right)^{2/5}=\left(\dfrac{2^5}{5^5}\right)^{2/5}=\dfrac{2^2}{5^2}=\boxed{\dfrac{4}{25}}[/tex]

__

The applicable rule of exponents is (a^b)^c = a^(bc).

Answer:

It doesn't intersect at that point

[tex]{ \bf{y = - 4x - 2}} \\ y = - (4 \times 4) - 2 \\ y = - 18[/tex]

Answer: N/A

Step-by-step explanation:

The line y = -4x - 2 does not go through the point (4, -1); it only passes through the point (4, -4(4) - 2) = (4, -18)

Answer:

hlo how are u?whats ur day is going

Answer:

13

Step-by-step explanation:

1. Round 19.625 up to 20.

2. Round 6.77 up to 7.

3. Calculate the equation. Ans is 13.

Answer:

8 batches

in workings show whats left over but not counted.

As a batch its a whole number as the multiplier will usually be the fraction

and fraction / fraction should always show fraction but the whole number given with a remainder can be shown if not a whole number.

Step-by-step explanation:

6 1/2 = 6.5

and ;

3/4 of a pound = 0.75  of 1 pound

6.5 / 0.75 = 8.7         or in full workings write = 8.6666.....7

8.7/ 1 = 8 batches with 0.7 or 0.66667 left over

Answer In fraction for exam question given in fraction  8.7 = 8  batches

with  7/10 left over.

Answer:

The slope of the green line is 3

Step-by-step explanation:

The lines are perpendicular, so the slopes are negative inverses

-1/(-1/3)

3

Answer: [tex]\dfrac{3}{16},\ \dfrac{1}{2}, \dfrac{7}{2}\ \text{inch}[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

Given

Javier created a table for the amount of water evaporated in each week

After two weeks, the amount of water evaporated is

[tex]\Rightarrow \dfrac{2}{16}+\dfrac{1}{16}\\\\\Rightarrow \dfrac{2+1}{16}=\dfrac{3}{16}\ \text{inch}[/tex]

Total amount of water evaporated in four weeks is

[tex]\Rightarrow \dfrac{2}{16}+\dfrac{1}{16}+\dfrac{3}{16}+\dfrac{2}{16}\\\\\Rightarrow \dfrac{2+1+3+2}{16}=\dfrac{8}{16}\\\Rightarrow \dfrac{1}{2}\ \text{inch}[/tex]

If Javier originally puts 4 inches of water, amount of water left in the bucket

[tex]\Rightarrow 4-\dfrac{1}{2}\\\\\Rightarrow \dfrac{4\times 2}{2}-\dfrac{1}{2}\\\\\Rightarrow \dfrac{8-1}{2}=\dfrac{7}{2}\ \text{inch}[/tex]