The net for a cylindrical candy container is shown.

net of a cylinder with diameter of both circles labeled 1.8 inches and a rectangle with a height labeled 0.8 inches

The container was covered in plastic wrap during manufacturing. How many square inches of plastic wrap were used to wrap the container? Write the answer in terms of π.

7.92π square inches
7.2π square inches
3.06π square inches
2.34π square inches

Using integration, we can find the function f(x) that satisfies f'(x) = ex/7:

f'(x) = ex/7

Integrating both sides with respect to x, we get:

f(x) = (7/e) ex/7 + C

Using the given initial condition, f(0) = 9, we can solve for the constant C:

f(0) = (7/e) e0 + C = 9

C = 9 - (7/e)

Therefore, the function f(x) is:

f(x) = (7/e) ex/7 + 9 - (7/e)

To find A, B, and C for the function f(x) = Ax + Bx + C, we need to use the given conditions:

f(5) = 13

-60 = f'(5)

Using the formula for f(x) above, we can find the values of A, B, and C:

f(5) = A(5)^2 + B(5) + C = 25A + 5B + C

f'(x) = 3x^2

f'(5) = 3(5)^2 = 75

-60 = f'(5) = 75A + B

Substituting f(5) and f'(5) into the equations above, we get:

25A + 5B + C = 13

75A + B = -60

Solving this system of equations, we get:

A = -1/25

B = -465/25

C = 812/25

Therefore, the function f(x) is:

f(x) = (-1/25)x^2 - (465/25)x + 812/25

Visit here to learn more about integration brainly.com/question/18125359

#SPJ11

Answer:

The probability of getting a sum greater than 10 when rolling two fair number cubes is 1/12. Therefore, the probability of getting a sum of 10 or less is 1 - 1/12 = 11/12.

If you repeat the experiment 180 times, the expected number of times you will get a sum of 10 or less is:

(11/12) * 180 = 165

Therefore, you can expect to get a sum of 10 or less approximately 165 times when rolling two number cubes 180 times.

Answer:

[tex]14 ^{7} \7 ^{3} [/tex]

=105,413,504÷343

=307328.00

The probability that a person selected from this group commutes to work by bus is 19%.

The probability that a person selected from this group commutes to work by bus is given by:

P(bus) = (Number of people who commute by bus) / (Total number of people surveyed)

P(bus) = 3,830 / 20,000

P(bus) = 0.1915

Multiplying by 100 to convert to a percentage, we get:

P(bus) = 19.15%

Rounding to the nearest whole number, we get:

P(bus) = 19%

Learn more about probability at: https://brainly.com/question/13604758

#SPJ1

The inequality represented by the line is X  ≥ -5.

An  inequality compares any two values and shows that one value is less than, greater than, or equal to the value on the other side of the equation.

In mathematics, an inequality is described as a relation which makes a non-equal comparison between two numbers or other mathematical expressions.

Inequality is used most often to compare two numbers on the number line by their size.

It is important top note that a  solution for an inequality in x is a number such that when we substitute that number for x we have a true statement.

Learn more about inequality at: https://brainly.com/question/25275758

#SPJ1

To sketch the Bode plots, we first need to write the transfer functions in terms of their magnitude and phase components.

G(s) = t1s/(1+t1s) * t2s/(1+t2s)

Magnitude: 20 log |G(jω)| = 20 log (t1t2) - 20 log √((1 + t1^2ω^2)(1 + t2^2ω^2))

Phase: arg(G(jω)) = arg(t1s/(1+t1s)) + arg(t2s/(1+t2s)) = -atan(t1ω) - atan(t2ω)

G(s) = t1s/(1+t1s) * 1/(t2s)

Magnitude: 20 log |G(jω)| = 20 log t1 - 20 log √((1 + t1^2ω^2)/ω^2t2^2)

Phase: arg(G(jω)) = arg(t1s/(1+t1s)) - arg(t2s) = -atan(t1ω) - (-π/2)

G(s) = -t1s/(1+t1s) * t2s/(1+t2s)

Magnitude: 20 log |G(jω)| = 20 log (t1t2) - 20 log √((1 + t1^2ω^2)(1 + t2^2ω^2))

Phase: arg(G(jω)) = arg(-t1s/(1+t1s)) + arg(t2s/(1+t2s)) = π - atan(t1ω) - atan(t2ω)

Now, we can plot the Bode plots using the magnitude and phase equations.

For system 1, the magnitude starts at 0 dB and decreases by 20 dB/decade for ω < t2 and by 40 dB/decade for t2 < ω < t1. The phase starts at 0 degrees and decreases by 90 degrees for ω < t2 and by 180 degrees for t2 < ω < t1.

For system 2, the magnitude starts at 20 log t1 dB and decreases by 20 dB/decade for ω < t1 and by 40 dB/decade for ω > t1. The phase starts at -atan(t1ω) degrees and decreases to -π/2 degrees at ω = 0 and to -π degrees at ω = ∞.

For system 3, the magnitude starts at 0 dB and decreases by 20 dB/decade for ω < t2 and by 40 dB/decade for t2 < ω < t1. The phase starts at 180 degrees and decreases by 90 degrees for ω < t2 and by 180 degrees for t2 < ω < t1.

Note that these are just rough sketches and the actual plots may differ slightly. The Bode plots provide a useful tool for analyzing the frequency response of a system.

Learn more about Bode plots,

https://brainly.com/question/31322290

#SPJ4

The error message you are receiving indicates that the 'by' argument in the merge function is not specifying a unique column. This can happen if there are duplicate column names in the data frames being merged or if the 'by' argument is not correctly specifying the column(s) that should be used for the merge.

To resolve this error, you can try the following steps:

1. Check the column names in each of the data frames being merged. Make sure there are no duplicate column names and that the column(s) you want to merge on are correctly named and spelled.

2. Check the 'by' argument in the merge function. Make sure it is specifying the correct column(s) for the merge. You can also try specifying the column names as character vectors to ensure that the correct columns are being used.

3. If you are still experiencing issues, try using the 'merge.data.table' function from the 'data.table' package. This function provides more efficient merging capabilities and may be better suited for larger datasets or more complex merging operations.

Overall, the key to resolving this error is to ensure that the 'by' argument is correctly specifying the column(s) to be merged on and that there are no duplicate column names in the data frames being merged.
Hi! To resolve the error "Error in fix.by(by.x, x) : 'by' must specify a uniquely valid column" while using the merge function in R, you should make sure that the 'by' argument specifies a column that exists in both data frames and has unique values. Here's a brief explanation:

1. Check if the specified column exists in both data frames: Make sure that the column you want to merge on is present in both data frames. If not, you may need to rename the columns to match.

2. Ensure unique values in the specified column: The 'by' column should have unique values in both data frames, as it's used as the key to match and merge the data. If there are duplicates, you may need to remove or handle them before performing the merge operation.

By following these steps, you should be able to resolve the error and successfully use the merge function in R.

Learn more about mathematics here: brainly.com/question/27235369

#SPJ11

To resolve the 'by' must specify a uniquely valid column error in the merge() function in R, and ensure that the column you specify in the 'by' parameter exists in both data frames and has unique values.

In R, the merge() function is used to combine two data frames based on a common column. The error message you encountered, Error in fix.by(by.x, x) : 'by' must specify a uniquely valid column, typically occurs when the values in the 'by' parameter of the merge() function are not present in both data frames or are ambiguous.

To resolve this error, you need to ensure that the column you specify in the 'by' parameter exists in both data frames and has unique values. You can do this by checking the column names in both data frames and making sure they are identical and also verifying the uniqueness of the values in the specified column.

For example:

https://brainly.com/question/34275840

Required solution of the given equations are x = 2 and y = -26

What is elimination method?

The elimination method is a technique used to solve systems of linear equations. The idea is to add or subtract the equations in order to eliminate one of the variables, which will allow us to solve for the other variable. In this case, we eliminated y by adding the two equations. The method can be used with any number of variables, but it can become more complex as the number of variables increases

To solve these equations by elimination method, we can eliminate one of the variables by adding or subtracting the two equations.

First, let's rearrange the second equation to put it in standard form:

y = -9x - 26

Now we can add the two equations:

-2x - y = 12.. ..(1)

y = -9x - 26

or, -9x-y = 26....(2)

We are subtracting equation (2) from equation (1) and get

-2x-y+9x+y = 26-12

So, 7x = 14

Simplifying, we get:

x = 2

Now, from equation (1),

-2×2-y = 12

So, y = -16

So the solution to the system of equations is (2,-16).

Learn more about equations here,

https://brainly.com/question/16904744

#SPJ1

The interval of convergence I of the series is (7.67, 8.33), and the radius of convergence r is half the length of this interval, which is:
r = (8.33 - 7.67) / 2 = 0.33

To find the radius of convergence (r) for the series Σ(3^n (x-8)^n) from n = 1 to infinity, we will use the Ratio Test. The Ratio Test states that the radius of convergence r is the limit as n goes to infinity of the absolute value of the ratio of consecutive terms, i.e.,

lim n→∞ |(3(n+1)(x-8)^(n+1))/(3n(x-8)^n)| = |x-8| lim n→∞ (3(n+1))/3n = |x-8|
Simplifying, we get:
|3(x-8)| = |3x - 24|

Now, for the series to converge, this ratio must be less than 1:
|3x - 24| < 1

Solving this inequality, we get:
-1 < 3x - 24 < 1
23 < 3x < 25
7.67 < x < 8.33

Therefore, the radius of convergence is r = 1, and the interval of convergence I is (7,9).

Learn more about Radius:

brainly.com/question/811328

#SPJ11

Based on the obtained t-value of 3.68 and the degrees of freedom (df) of 10 in a 2-tailed independent test, you would reject the null hypothesis (H₀) because the t-value is likely to be significant. A. Reject the H0.

When conducting a hypothesis test using a two-tailed independent test, we compare the calculated t-value with the critical t-value from the t-distribution table using the degrees of freedom (df) for the test.

If the calculated t-value is greater than the critical t-value, we reject the null hypothesis (H₀). In this case, the top is 3.68, which is greater than the critical t-value for df = 10. Therefore, we reject the H₀.
Therefore, A. Reject the H₀

Learn more about the Null hypothesis:

brainly.com/question/28920252

#SPJ11

The least squares estimators for the intercept and slope in a simple linear regression model are obtained by minimizing the sum of squared residuals or error sum of squares.

The correct answers for the following  the least squares estimators for the intercept and slope of the population regression line are computed by minimizing are

The other options listed are incorrect. The SST (sum of squares total) is the total variation in the dependent variable, and is not minimized to obtain the least squares estimators.

The R-square is the proportion of the total variation in the dependent variable that is explained by the independent variable, and is not minimized to obtain the least squares estimators.

The sample correlation coefficient is a measure of the strength of the linear relationship between the two variables, but is not minimized to obtain the least squares estimators.

The sum of absolute differences between the actual observations and the predicted values of the dependent variable and the differences between the actual observations and the predicted values of the dependent variable are not used to compute the least squares estimators.

To learn more about linear regression model:

https://brainly.com/question/25987747

#SPJ11

For the given cost function, C(x) = 54√x * x^2 * 274625, let's find the cost, average cost, and marginal cost at the production level of 1450.

1. Cost at the production level 1450:
C(1450) = 54√1450 * 1450^2 * 274625
C(1450) ≈ 328,034,242,150

2. Average cost at the production level 1450:
Average Cost (AC) = C(x) / x
AC(1450) = 328,034,242,150 / 1450
AC(1450) ≈ 226,237,751

3. Marginal cost at the production level 1450:
To find the marginal cost (MC), we first need to find the derivative of the cost function C(x) with respect to x.

Given the complexity of the function, I suggest using a symbolic calculator or a software tool like Wolfram Alpha to find the derivative. Once you have the derivative, plug in x = 1450 to get the marginal cost.

4. Production level that minimizes average cost:
To find the production level that minimizes the average cost, set the derivative of the average cost function (with respect to x) to 0 and solve for x. The resulting x-value will give you the production level that minimizes the average cost.

5. Minimal average cost:
Once you have the production level that minimizes the average cost, plug that value back into the average cost function to find the minimal average cost. Please note that the given cost function appears to be incorrect or incomplete, so these calculations may not be accurate. Make sure to double-check the original cost function before proceeding with these steps.

To know more about derivative click here

brainly.com/question/29096174

#SPJ11

x1 is an unbiased estimator of θ, but it is not an unbiased estimator of θ^2.

To solve about unbiased estimators involving a Bernoulli distribution with parameter θ.

(a) Is x1 an unbiased estimator of θ?

An estimator is unbiased if the expected value (E) of the estimator equals the true parameter value. For a Bernoulli distribution, the expected value of x1 is E(x1) = θ. Therefore, x1 is an unbiased estimator of θ because E(x1) = θ.

(b) Is x1 an unbiased estimator of θ^2?

To determine if x1 is an unbiased estimator of θ^2, we need to calculate the expected value of x1^2 and compare it to θ^2. For a Bernoulli distribution, E(x1^2) = θ. Since E(x1^2) ≠ θ^2, x1 is not an unbiased estimator of θ^2.

In summary, x1 is an unbiased estimator of θ, but it is not an unbiased estimator of θ^2.

Learn more about Bernoulli Distribution at:
https://brainly.com/question/30049535

#SPJ11

Depends if your dividing or Times

Step-by-step explanation: So,

I want to say it would be 1 But there is a Off And on question (Try Dividing )

Both the computation of out-degrees and in-degrees in a directed graph represented as an adjacency-list can be done in O(V+E) time complexity.

In an adjacency-list representation of a directed graph, the out-degree of a vertex is simply the number of adjacent vertices in the list, while the in-degree of a vertex is the number of times it appears in the lists of adjacent vertices for other vertices in the graph.
To compute the out-degree of every vertex, we need to iterate through each vertex in the graph and count the number of adjacent vertices in its adjacency list. This can be done in O(V+E) time complexity, where V is the number of vertices and E is the number of edges in the graph. This is because we need to visit each vertex once, and for each vertex, we need to examine all its adjacent vertices.
On the other hand, to compute the in-degrees of every vertex, we need to iterate through each vertex in the graph and count the number of times it appears in the adjacency lists of other vertices. This can also be done in O(V+E) time complexity, as we need to examine each vertex once and count the number of times it appears in the adjacency lists of all other vertices.
In summary, both the computation of out-degrees and in-degrees in a directed graph represented as an adjacency-list can be done in O(V+E) time complexity.

for more questions on graph

https://brainly.com/question/17089414

#SPJ11

The indefinite integral of ∫x cos 9x dx using integration by parts with the given choices of u and dv is:
∫x cos 9x dx = (1/9) x sin 9x - (1/81) cos 9x + C.

To find the indefinite integral of ∫x cos 9x dx using integration by parts, we need to choose u and dv. In this case, we will let u = x and dv = cos 9x dx.

Using the formula for integration by parts:
∫u dv = uv - ∫v du

We can substitute our choices for u and dv:
∫x cos 9x dx = x ∫cos 9x dx - ∫(∫cos 9x dx) dx

We now need to find the integral of cos 9x, which we can do using the formula:
∫cos ax dx = (1/a) sin ax + C

In this case, a = 9, so:
∫cos 9x dx = (1/9) sin 9x + C

Substituting this back into our original equation:
∫x cos 9x dx = x ((1/9) sin 9x + C) - ∫((1/9) sin 9x + C) dx

Simplifying:
∫x cos 9x dx = (1/9) x sin 9x - (1/81) cos 9x + C

The indefinite integral of ∫x cos 9x dx using integration by parts with the given choices of u and dv is:
∫x cos 9x dx = (1/9) x sin 9x - (1/81) cos 9x + C.

To learn more about indefinite integral visit:

brainly.com/question/29133144

#SPJ11

The 87% confidence interval for the size of the candles is (3.503 ounces, 3.937 ounces).

To calculate the 87% confidence interval, follow these steps:

1. Identify the sample size (n=15), sample mean (3.72 ounces), and standard deviation (0.963 ounces).

2. Determine the critical value (z) for an 87% confidence interval using a standard normal distribution table or calculator. For an 87% CI, the critical value is approximately 1.534.

3. Calculate the standard error (SE) using the formula SE = standard deviation / sqrt(n). In this case, SE = 0.963 / sqrt(15) ≈ 0.248.

4. Multiply the critical value (z) by the standard error (SE) to find the margin of error (MOE): MOE = 1.534 * 0.248 ≈ 0.380.

5. Find the lower limit of the confidence interval by subtracting the MOE from the sample mean: 3.72 - 0.380 = 3.503 ounces.

6. Find the upper limit of the confidence interval by adding the MOE to the sample mean: 3.72 + 0.380 = 3.937 ounces.

So, the 87% confidence interval for the size of the candles is (3.503 ounces, 3.937 ounces).

To know more about confidence interval click on below link:

https://brainly.com/question/13067956#

#SPJ11

There are 54 odd numbers between 3000 and 6000 that can be formed using the numbers 1, 3, 5 and 8..

Natural numbers are  positive  or non-negative integers starting at 1 and ending at infinity, for example: 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,……,∞

Properties of Natural Numbers : Closure property,Commutative property Associative Property,Distributive property

To form an odd number, the last digit must be either 1, 3 or 5. We can use the numbers 1, 3, 5 and 8 to form  thousands, hundreds and tens.

There are 4 options for the number of thousands  (1, 3, 5 or 8) and when you choose, there are 4 options for the number of hundreds (because repetition is allowed). There are also 4 options for decimals. So there are a total of 4 × 4 × 4 = 64 possible numbers between 3000 and 6000 that can be formed using the numbers 1, 3, 5 and 8.

 However, we must exclude  even numbers from this number. There are two options for the last number: 1 or 5. In any case, there are 3 options for the remaining numbers (because we cannot repeat any number). So there are a total of 2 × 3 × 3 × 3 = 54 odd numbers between 3000 and 6000 that can be formed using the numbers 1, 3, 5 and 8.  Therefore, there are 54 odd numbers between 3000 and 6000 that can be formed using the numbers 1, 3, 5 and 8..

Learn more about  Properties of Natural Numbers here

https://brainly.com/question/30078238

#SPJ1

Solutions (a,b) = (3,8) or (8,3), which are not in Z11. Therefore, the polynomial x^2 + x + 4 is irreducible over Z11.

To show that the polynomial x^2 + x + 4 is irreducible over Z11, we need to ensure that it cannot be factored into simpler polynomials with integer coefficients modulo 11. In Z11, we can test the possible roots of the polynomial using the integers {0, 1, 2, ..., 10} and see if any of them satisfy the equation x^2 + x + 4 ≡ 0 (mod 11). If none of them do, then the polynomial is irreducible.
Testing each integer, we find:
0: (0^2 + 0 + 4) ≡ 4 (mod 11)
1: (1^2 + 1 + 4) ≡ 6 (mod 11)
2: (2^2 + 2 + 4) ≡ 2 (mod 11)
3: (3^2 + 3 + 4) ≡ 5 (mod 11)
4: (4^2 + 4 + 4) ≡ 3 (mod 11)
5: (5^2 + 5 + 4) ≡ 10 (mod 11)
6: (6^2 + 6 + 4) ≡ 8 (mod 11)
7: (7^2 + 7 + 4) ≡ 7 (mod 11)
8: (8^2 + 8 + 4) ≡ 9 (mod 11)
9: (9^2 + 9 + 4) ≡ 4 (mod 11)
10: (10^2 + 10 + 4) ≡ 6 (mod 11)
Since none of these integers satisfy the equation, the polynomial x^2 + x + 4 is irreducible over Z11.

To show that x^2 + x + 4 is irreducible over Z11, we can use the following steps:
Step 1: Substitute all possible values of x in the polynomial and check if it has any linear factors.
x = 0: 0^2 + 0 + 4 = 4 (not zero)
x = 1: 1^2 + 1 + 4 = 6 (not zero)
x = 2: 2^2 + 2 + 4 = 10 (not zero)
x = 3: 3^2 + 3 + 4 = 1 (zero)
x = 4: 4^2 + 4 + 4 = 7 (not zero)
x = 5: 5^2 + 5 + 4 = 10 (not zero)
x = 6: 6^2 + 6 + 4 = 2 (not zero)
x = 7: 7^2 + 7 + 4 = 10 (not zero)
x = 8: 8^2 + 8 + 4 = 5 (not zero)
x = 9: 9^2 + 9 + 4 = 9 (not zero)
x = 10: 10^2 + 10 + 4 = 5 (not zero)
Since there are no linear factors (i.e. no values of x that make the polynomial equal to zero), the polynomial is not reducible over Z11.
Step 2: Check if the polynomial has any quadratic factors by assuming it does, and then solving for the coefficients of the quadratic factors using the division algorithm.
Let the polynomial be factored as (x+a)(x+b), where a and b are in Z11. Then, expanding this expression gives:
x^2 + (a+b)x + ab
Comparing the coefficients of this expression with the coefficients of the original polynomial x^2 + x + 4, we get the following system of equations:
a + b = 1
ab = 4
Solving this system of equations gives the solutions (a,b) = (3,8) or (8,3), which are not in Z11. Therefore, the polynomial x^2 + x + 4 is irreducible over Z11.

Learn more about Polynomial here: brainly.com/question/12976257

#SPJ11

Answer:

The answer to your problem is, y = 0.2x

Step-by-step explanation:

We know that in the graph:

X 5 10 15 25 40

Y 1 2 3 5 8

We would then need to divide the bold

5 / 40 ( left to right )

= 0.2

Thus the answer is, y = 0.2x

The value of E[[tex]X^{2}[/tex]] is [tex]C^{3}[/tex]. The correct answer is (d) [tex]C^{3}[/tex] .

An exponential random variable is a continuous probability distribution that models the time between independent and rare events, such as the time between arrivals in a queue. It has a single parameter called the rate parameter that determines the probability of an event occurring at a particular time.

As per in the given case, the expected value of [tex]X^{2}[/tex], denoted as E[[tex]X^{2}[/tex]], can be calculated as:

[tex]E[X^2] = Var(X) + E[X]^2[/tex]

Since X is an exponential random variable, its variance is equal to the square of its mean. Thus, we have:

[tex]Var(X)[/tex]  =   [tex](1/λ)^2[/tex] = [tex]1/C^{3}[/tex]

[tex]E[X]^2[/tex] = [tex]C^{2}[/tex]

Therefore,

[tex]E[X^2][/tex] = Var(X) + [tex]E[X]^2[/tex] = [tex](1/C)^{2}[/tex] + [tex]C^{2}[/tex] = [tex]C^{2}[/tex](1/[tex]C^{2}[/tex] + 1) = [tex]C^{2}[/tex] + [tex]C^{3}[/tex]/[tex]C^{2}[/tex] = [tex]C^{3}[/tex][tex]/C^{2}[/tex] + [tex]C^2[/tex]

So the answer is (d) [tex]C^{3}[/tex].

You can learn more about exponential random variable at

https://brainly.com/question/30885717

#SPJ11

Answer:

c is the correct answer. If N is a non-zero integer, then N^2 is a non-zero integer.

16/5 is not an integer, so a is wrong.

(5^2 + 1)/5 = 26/5 is not an integer, so b is wrong.

By the Limit Comparison Test, since the series sigma ^infinity n=1 1/n^2 converges, the series sigma ^infinity_n=1 sin(1/n) sin(1/n) also converges. So, the answer is that the series converges.

Hi! I'm happy to help you with the Limit Comparison Test to determine the convergence or divergence of the given series.

Given series: Σ(sin(1/n) * sin(1/n)) from n=1 to infinity

We can simplify the series to: Σ(sin^2(1/n)) from n=1 to infinity

Now, we will use the Limit Comparison Test by comparing our given series with a known series. A suitable comparison series would be Σ(1/n^2) from n=1 to infinity, which is a convergent p-series with p = 2.

Next, we compute the limit as n approaches infinity:

lim (n→∞) [(sin^2(1/n)) / (1/n^2)]

Applying L'Hôpital's rule (since it's an indeterminate form 0/0):

lim (n→∞) [(2sin(1/n)cos(1/n)(-1/n^2)) / (-2/n^3)]

Cancel out the common terms:

lim (n→∞) [n * sin(1/n) * cos(1/n)]

Now, as n approaches infinity, sin(1/n) approaches 1/n and cos(1/n) approaches 1:

lim (n→∞) [n * (1/n) * 1] = lim (n→∞) [1]

Since the limit is a constant value (1), the Limit Comparison Test tells us that the behavior of the given series matches that of the comparison series. Therefore, the given series Σ(sin^2(1/n)) from n=1 to infinity converges.

Learn more about comparison series here:

brainly.com/question/3714358

#SPJ11

The n>7 and H has no cycles of length less than 7, then m<5.

What is Euler Formula?

The recall Euler's formula for planar graphs, which states that for any connected planar graph with v vertices, e edges, and f faces, v-e+f=2.

Now, in the given problem, we are told that H is a planar graph with n vertices and m edges, and that it does not have any cycles of length less than 7. Let's assume, for the sake of contradiction, that m≥5.

Since H is planar, we know that it has a face, which we will call F. F must have at least three edges bounding it, since otherwise it would be a cycle of length less than 3, which contradicts the given information. Let's call these three edges e1, e2, and e3, and let their endpoints be v1, v2, and v3, respectively.

Now, since H has no cycles of length less than 7, we know that there is no path of length 4 or less that connects v1 and v3 without revisiting a vertex. Thus, any such path must use one of the edges e1, e2, or e3 at least twice. Without loss of generality, assume that the path uses e1 twice. Then, we can "cut" the graph along the path to create a new planar graph H' with the same number of vertices, but one fewer edge. Specifically, we remove e1 and add a new edge connecting v2 and some other vertex w that lies on the path between v1 and v3.

We can repeat this process until we have a planar graph H'' with n vertices and at most 4 edges. But this contradicts our assumption that m≥5, so we must conclude that m<5.

Thus, we have proven that if H is a planar graph with n vertices and m edges, where n>7 and H has no cycles of length less than 7, then m<5.

Learn more about Euler Formula.

brainly.com/question/24300924

#SPJ11

The probability that the mean height of the sample is 0.6826. The correct answer is option c.

To solve this problem, we need to use the central limit theorem, which states that the sample means of a large enough sample size from a population with a known mean and standard deviation will be approximately normally distributed.

In this case, we are given that the heights of 18-year-old men are normally distributed with a mean of 67 inches and a standard deviation of 3 inches. We want to find the probability that the mean height of a random sample of nine 18-year-old men is between 66 and 68 inches.

First, we need to find the standard error of the mean, which is calculated by dividing the standard deviation by the square root of the sample size:

standard error of the mean = 3 / sqrt(9) = 1

Next, we need to standardize the sample mean using the z-score formula:

z = (sample mean - population mean) / standard error of the mean
z = (66 - 67) / 1 = -1
z = (68 - 67) / 1 = 1

We can now use a standard normal distribution table to find the area under the curve between z = -1 and z = 1. This area represents the probability that the sample mean falls between 66 and 68 inches.

Looking at the table, we find that the area between z = -1 and z = 1 is 0.6826. Therefore, the probability that the mean height of a random sample of nine 18-year-old men is between 66 and 68 inches tall is c. 0.6826.

Therefore the correct answer is option C.

learn more about 'probability':

https://brainly.com/question/13604758
#SPJ11

The result for the expression -8(11/2) + 2(21/4) using PEDMAS will result to a value of -33.5.

P – Parenthesis First: B – Brackets First

E – Exponents

D – Division

M – Multiplication

A – Addition

S – Subtraction

We open the parenthesis (bracket) first;

-8 (1 1/2) +2 (2 1/4) = - 8/2 × 11 + 2/4 × 21

-8 (1 1/2) +2 (2 1/4) = - 4 × 11 + 1/2 × 21

-8 (1 1/2) +2 (2 1/4) = - 44 + 10.5

-8 (1 1/2) +2 (2 1/4) = - 33.5

Therefore, using PEDMAS correctly, we derive the result of the expression to be the value -33 5

Read more about PEDMAS here: https://brainly.com/question/345677

#SPJ1

The sum of the first 9 terms in the sequence can then be calculated as Sₙ = 20,155,390

Geometric series involve a sequence of numbers that follow a particular pattern.

Given:

a₁ = 14

r = -84/14 = -6

n = 9

Sₙ = 14 - 14(-6)⁹/1 - (-6)

Sₙ = 20,155,390

Therefore, the sum of the first 9 terms of the sequence is 20,155,390.

In this case, the sequence is defined by multiplying the preceding term by a common ratio (r). The sum of a finite geometric series can be found by using the formula Sₙ = a₁ - a₁rⁿ/1 - r.

The initial term (a₁) and the common ratio (r) are needed to find the sum of the sequence.

a₁ = 14 and r = -84/14 = -6. The sum of the first 9 terms in the sequence can then be calculated as Sₙ = 20,155,390

For more questions related to sequence

https://brainly.com/question/7882626

#SPJ1

False, because 10^(-4.3) can be rewritten as 10^(-4)*10^(-0.3), which is approximately 0.000398. This value is between 0.0001 and 0.001, not between 0.00001 and 0.0001.

The statement is false because 10^(-4.3) can be expressed as 10^(-4)*10^(-0.3), and 10^(-4) is equal to 0.0001. Moreover, 10^(-0.3) is approximately 0.5012. Therefore, the product of these two values is approximately 0.000398, which is between 0.0001 and 0.001, but not between 0.00001 and 0.0001.

It is important to understand how to manipulate exponential expressions to determine the approximate value of an expression without performing any calculations.

Learn more about exponential expressions at:

brainly.com/question/26540624

#SPJ4