the oldest pottery wheels we know of belonged to this ancient culture.

Baseball and entertainment played a significant role in shaping America's social, economic, and political landscape in the 1920s. It was a time when America was emerging from World War I, and there was a need for unity, social cohesion, and a sense of national identity.

Baseball was the most popular sport at the time, and it brought people together, regardless of their social, economic, or political background. It provided a sense of belonging, pride, and unity that was much needed at the time.

Entertainment was also a crucial aspect of American life in the 1920s. It was a time when people wanted to forget the hardships of the war years and enjoy life to the fullest. The popularity of jazz music, dance, and theater provided people with an escape from their everyday lives. Jazz music was the soundtrack of the 1920s, and it helped to bring people together. It was a symbol of cultural diversity and creativity.

baseball and entertainment had a significant impact on America in the 1920s. They helped to create a sense of national unity, pride, and identity. They also contributed to economic growth and provided people with an escape from the hardships of everyday life. Baseball and entertainment helped to shape the social, economic, and political landscape of America, and their impact can still be felt today.

To know more about social cohesion visit:-

https://brainly.com/question/9234996

#SPJ11

A nation-state is a geographic area where a single person or group rules over people having a shared culture or history.

For more such questions on Nation-state:

https://brainly.com/question/1822102

#SPJ8

Yes, it is important to learn about history because it helps us understand the past, make informed decisions, and shape the future.

Yes, it is crucial to learn about history for several reasons.

Overall, learning history is vital for personal growth, informed citizenship, and building a better future.

For more such questions on History:

https://brainly.com/question/24466312

#SPJ8

The Khmer kings built this complex that included two main types of temples. The Khmer kings built Angkor Wat, which is a complex that included two main types of temples.

The Angkor Wat temple complex, located in Cambodia, is considered the world's largest religious monument and one of Southeast Asia's most remarkable architectural accomplishments. It was built between the 9th and 15th centuries by the Khmer Empire's kings. The temple complex is divided into two main types of temples: the central temple, which was dedicated to the god Vishnu, and the surrounding smaller temples, which were devoted to Shiva and other Hindu gods.

The Angkor Wat temple complex is composed of a series of concentric walls and moats that surround a central sanctuary. The temple's main temple, which is made up of five towers, is located in the center of this sanctuary. The towers are thought to represent Mount Meru, a mythical mountain in Hindu and Buddhist cosmology.

Learn more about Angkor Wat: https://brainly.com/question/486956

#SPJ11

The Khmer kings were the ones responsible for constructing the Angkor complex, which included two types of temples.

These temples were classified into two main types, Hindu and Buddhist temples, which are found in various parts of Southeast Asia .The Khmer Empire was one of the most powerful empires in Southeast Asia from the 9th to the 15th century. The Angkor complex is one of the most spectacular examples of the empire's legacy, which can still be seen today. The Hindu temples that can be found at Angkor are the earlier of the two types, and they were built between the 9th and 11th centuries. The most well-known of these is the Angkor Was, which is an architectural masterpiece that is often compared to the Taj Mahal. The second type of temple, Buddhist temples, started appearing in the 12th century. Unlike the earlier temples, which were built using sandstone, the later ones were constructed using laterite, a cheaper material. A fine example of the Buddhist temples is the Bayon, which was built by King Jayavarman VII. It was believed to have been the site of the royal palace of the Angkor Thom, the city that was at the center of the Khmer empire. The temples built by the Khmer kings are a testament to the civilization's incredible engineering skills. Despite the limited technology and resources at their disposal, they were able to create masterpieces that still captivate and inspire people to this day.

To know more about complex visit:-

https://brainly.com/question/29377605

#SPJ11

For an injured party to recover damages for tortious interference with an existing contractual relationship, the tortfeasor must have had knowledge of the existing contractual relationship.

To successfully claim damages for tortious interference with an existing contractual relationship, the injured party must demonstrate that the tortfeasor had knowledge of the contractual relationship between the injured party and a third party. Knowledge is a crucial element because it establishes that the tortfeasor intentionally interfered with the contractual relationship, knowing that their actions could disrupt or harm the existing agreement. Without knowledge of the contractual relationship, it becomes challenging to prove the tortious interference claim.

Therefore, establishing the tortfeasor's awareness of the contractual arrangement is an essential factor in pursuing a legal remedy for tortious interference.

To know more about contractual relationship, click here:

https://brainly.com/question/32398179

#SPJ11

Great Britain's blockade of Germany in 1914, at the outset of World War I, had a major impact on the war and its outcome. Britain's naval blockade of Germany cut off all supply lines, including food, raw materials, and weapons, which caused economic instability and hardship in Germany.

The war lasted for more than four years, and the blockade was one of the factors that weakened the Central Powers' ability to continue fighting. Germany's ability to import raw materials was hampered by the blockade, as was its ability to export finished products. Germany was deprived of its primary source of food, which led to widespread hunger and famine in the country.The blockade also hampered Germany's military efforts. The German Navy was unable to maintain its ships, and many were forced to remain in port due to a lack of fuel. The German army was also affected, as it was unable to receive necessary supplies and reinforcements.

Therefore, Great Britain's blockade of Germany had a significant impact on the war and contributed to the defeat of the Central Powers. The blockade, along with other factors, weakened the German economy and military capabilities, leading to Germany's eventual surrender.

To know more about Naval blockade visit-

https://brainly.com/question/4378956

#SPJ11

Since the year 2000, political divisions in America have deepened. This has led to a pattern that can be observed in the table that might have been caused by this.

The pattern is that the number of people who identify as Democrats and the number of people who identify as Republicans have become increasingly polarized, while the number of people who identify as independents has remained relatively constant.

The data in the table shows that the percentage of Americans who identify as Democrats has decreased from 36% in 2004 to 30% in 2016, while the percentage of Americans who identify as Republicans has increased from 31% in 2004 to 26% in 2016.

This trend has led to an increasingly polarized political environment, with Democrats and Republicans becoming more ideologically divided.The increase in political polarization has been driven by a number of factors, including changes in the media landscape, demographic shifts, and changes in the political landscape. The rise of cable news and social media has made it easier for people to find and consume information that reinforces their existing beliefs, leading to more ideologically homogenous political factions.

The demographic shifts that have occurred in America over the past few decades have also contributed to political polarization. As the country becomes more diverse, with a growing number of minority groups, some political factions have become more hostile to immigration and more focused on issues of race and ethnicity.

The political landscape has also changed, with the rise of more extreme candidates and the decline of centrist politicians. This has led to a situation where voters are increasingly choosing between candidates who represent very different visions of America's future.

For more such questions on political divisions

https://brainly.com/question/27310544

#SPJ8

The false statement about ancient Sumerian city-states is their political structure was democraticin nature. Option d is correct.

The ancient Sumerian city-states were predominantly agricultural communities that lived in southern Mesopotamia (present-day Iraq) that thrived between the 4th and 3rd millennia BCE. The ancient Sumerians were ruled by kings, who were in charge of administration and the military.

They also had priests, who were responsible for the religious aspects of society, and a wealthy class that owned much of the land. Moreover, the city-states mastered the use of bronze, engaged in monumental construction projects, and warfare between them was common.

The ancient Sumerians were one of the earliest civilizations to develop in the world. Their cities were built around temples, and the priests were some of the most influential members of society. They built some of the most impressive structures of the ancient world, such as the Ziggurat of Ur.

Therefore, d is correct.

Learn more about ancient Sumerian  https://brainly.com/question/27945368

#SPJ11

The ancient Sumerian city-states existed from the period of 4th millennium BCE to 2nd millennium BCE. They are recognized for their innovations in many fields of human activity and social organization.

The given options a, b, c and d are all true about the ancient Sumerian city-states, whereas option e is not true as their political structure was not democratic in nature, but rather a combination of monarchy, theocracy, and bureaucracy.
Option e is not true about the ancient Sumerian city-states, as their political structure was not democratic in nature, but rather a combination of monarchy, theocracy, and bureaucracy. The Sumerian city-states were ruled by kings, who were considered representatives of the gods. The kings of each city-state maintained their power by creating armies and by their control over the religious cults. Hence, option e is incorrect.The Sumerians excelled in architecture, engineering, science, mathematics, and medicine. They invented the wheel, developed irrigation systems, built complex cities, and created impressive works of art, including statues, reliefs, and pottery. They also produced the first written language, which consisted of pictograms and cuneiform scripts. Hence, option d is true. Warfare between the city-states was common, due to disputes over water, land, and resources. They engaged in frequent battles and established alliances to protect themselves from external threats. Hence, option b is true. They also used bronze to make tools, weapons, and ornaments. Bronze was created by mixing copper with tin, which produced a harder and more durable metal. Hence, option c is true. They were primarily agricultural communities and depended on the fertile soil provided by the Tigris and Euphrates rivers. They cultivated wheat, barley, beans, and lentils, and raised sheep, goats, and cattle. Hence, option a is true.In conclusion, option e is not true about the ancient Sumerian city-states as their political structure was not democratic in nature, whereas the other options (a, b, c, and d) are true.

To know more about city-states visit :-

https://brainly.com/question/30912604

#SPJ11

The best way for a country to implement foreign policy is not unilaterally with military power, but rather multilaterally and with the use of soft power. This statement is FALSE.

Unilateral foreign policy is when a country decides to make decisions or take actions on its own without the help of other countries.

This approach is not suitable for implementing foreign policy because it ignores the concerns and needs of other countries and can lead to conflict and negative consequences for the country implementing it.

Unilateral foreign policy with military power can even lead to war and destabilize international relations.

Multilateral foreign policy, on the other hand, is when a country works with other countries to achieve its goals.

This approach is more effective and beneficial in implementing foreign policy because it allows countries to address complex issues that require collective action, such as climate change, terrorism, and global trade.

Multilateralism promotes cooperation and collaboration between countries, leading to more stable and prosperous international relations.

For more questions on foreign policy

https://brainly.com/question/2196996

#SPJ8

In the early twentieth century, America's empire was all of the following except: A desire to hold its territories in perpetuity.

What was America's empire in the early twentieth century? Empire is the word for a group of countries ruled by a single entity or person. In the early twentieth century, America was a colonial power with territories in the Caribbean and the Pacific.Here are some of the ways America's empire in the early twentieth century was depicted:Territories of the United States expanded beyond its continental borders after the Spanish-American War in 1898.In Cuba, Puerto Rico, the Philippines, Guam, and Hawaii, the United States gained sovereignty over these territories. They believed that American values and democracy should be shared across the world.Americans had a paternalistic attitude towards the peoples they colonized, believing that they were more civilized and better equipped to rule them.Americans believed that expanding their empire would benefit the United States by increasing trade, securing military bases, and offering new markets for American goods.In the early twentieth century, the United States did not have a desire to hold its territories in perpetuity. After the Spanish-American War, the United States granted Cuba its independence, and Puerto Rico became a U.S. commonwealth rather than a state.To sum up, America's empire in the early twentieth century was all of the following except a desire to hold its territories in perpetuity.

To know more about empire visit :-

https://brainly.com/question/29587302

#SPJ11

FDR formally recognized the Soviet Union in 1933 benefitted the United States by opening up trade between the two nations and creating a powerful alliance that helped to defeat Nazi Germany in World War II.

President Franklin D. Roosevelt's formal recognition of the Soviet Union in 1933 was beneficial to the United States in several ways. One significant benefit was that it opened up trade between the two countries. The United States could now export goods to the Soviet Union, which was a large market for American products. This provided a boost to the American economy during the Great Depression.

Another benefit was that it created a powerful alliance between the two nations. The Soviet Union was a major world power, and its alliance with the United States helped to deter other nations from challenging its dominance. This alliance became even more important during World War II, as the Soviet Union was a key ally in the fight against Nazi Germany.

Overall, FDR's decision to formally recognize the Soviet Union in 1933 had significant benefits for the United States. It opened up trade opportunities and created a powerful alliance that helped to shape world events in the years to come.

To know more about President Franklin Roosevelt's visit:

https://brainly.com/question/20856715

#SPJ11

True,

The United States controlled the Panama Canal when it opened in 1914 until it transferred control to Panama in 1979.

The panama canal was constructed by the United States between 1904 and 1914, after acquiring the rights to the project from the French, who had attempted to build a canal in Panama but faced numerous challenges and eventually abandoned the project.

The United States took over and successfully completed the construction of the canal. The Panama Canal Zone, which encompassed the canal and the surrounding area, was under U.S. control until 1979 when the United States agreed to transfer control of the canal to Panama through the Torrijos-Carter Treaties.

Learn more about: Panama Canal

brainly.com/question/1278837

#SPJ11

The Empress Theodora is remembered for her role as an b). opponent of iconoclasm in the Iconoclast Controversy.

The Iconoclast Controversy was a period of Byzantine history that lasted from the 8th to the 9th centuries AD. It was marked by the banning of religious images by the Byzantine government. It was a religious and political controversy that divided the Byzantine Empire. It was a conflict that started under Emperor Leo III, who banned the use of religious images (icons) in churches and other religious places.

The Empress Theodora was a key figure in the Iconoclast Controversy. She was the wife of Emperor Theophilos, who was a supporter of iconoclasm. When her husband died, Theodora became the regent for her son, Michael III. She reversed the iconoclast policy of her husband and supported the use of religious images in churches and other religious places.

She was an opponent of iconoclasm and worked to end the Iconoclast Controversy.

Therefore, the correct answer is b). opponent of iconoclasm

Learn more about Iconoclast Controversy; brainly.com/question/8157592

#SPJ11

The Empress Theora was remembered for her role as a mediator between the conflicting parties in the Iconoclast Controversy that took place between the eighth and ninth centuries in the Byzantine Empire.

This conflict arose from a disagreement over the use of religious images or icons in the Orthodox Church.The Iconoclast Controversy began with the rise of Emperor Leo III, who opposed the use of religious images, claiming that they were idols and went against the Bible's teachings. Leo ordered the removal of icons from churches, and those who opposed him were exiled or persecuted. This led to a rift in the empire, with some supporting the use of icons, while others favored iconoclasm.The Empress Theora was the wife of Emperor Theophilus, who succeeded Leo III and continued with the policy of iconoclasm. Theora, who was a devout Christian, disagreed with her husband's views on religious images. She is remembered for her attempts to bring peace to the conflicting parties, through dialogue and diplomacy. Theora invited prominent religious leaders from both sides to discuss the issue, and she urged her husband to be more tolerant of those who opposed his policy. Her efforts helped to ease tensions, and after her death, her sons ended the policy of iconoclasm. Thus, Theora played a critical role in resolving the conflict, and her efforts are still remembered today.

To know more about Controversy visit :-

https://brainly.com/question/28347863

#SPJ11

The Ottoman Empire's decision to Europeanize was driven by several reasons. One of the primary reasons was the decline of the empire's economic and military power.

The Ottomans found themselves losing territories to European powers, and they realized that their traditional military techniques and administrative structures were no longer sufficient to compete with the Europeans.

Secondly, Ottoman intellectuals and statesmen were impressed with the European way of life. They felt that the Europeans were more advanced in science, technology, education, and administration than the Ottomans. As such, they believed that emulating European practices was the only way to restore the empire's former glory.

Additionally, the Ottomans hoped that by Europeanizing, they would be able to gain respect and recognition from European powers, thereby strengthening their position in the international arena.

Finally, the Tanzimat reforms were also motivated by a desire to modernize the Ottoman state to make it more efficient and responsive to the needs of its citizens. The Ottomans realized that traditional practices and institutions were no longer capable of addressing the challenges of the modern world.

Learn more about Ottomans https://brainly.com/question/8574066

#SPJ11

In the 18th century, the Ottoman Empire began a series of reforms aimed at modernizing state institutions following European models. The Tanzimat, or reorganizations, were a part of these reforms.

The decision to Europeanize was based on several reasons, including the desire to catch up with European powers in terms of military strength and economic development. European powers had overtaken the Ottomans in these areas, and the Ottomans saw the need to adopt European practices to remain competitive. The Ottomans were also motivated by a desire to maintain their territorial integrity and sovereignty. European powers were encroaching on Ottoman territory and influence, and the Ottomans saw the need to modernize their institutions to be better equipped to resist European aggression.

In addition, the Ottomans sought to legitimize their rule and gain the support of their subjects. European models of governance were seen as more advanced and effective, and adopting them was seen as a way to gain legitimacy and support from the Ottoman people. Finally, the Ottomans were also motivated by a desire to modernize their society and culture. They saw European culture and society as more advanced and sophisticated, and sought to emulate them. This desire for modernization was driven by a sense of inferiority compared to European powers, and a desire to catch up and be seen as an equal. Overall, the decision to Europeanize was driven by a complex mix of political, economic, social, and cultural factors. The Tanzimat reforms were an attempt to address these factors and bring the Ottoman Empire up to par with European powers.

To know more about institutions visit :-

https://brainly.com/question/32317274

#SPJ11

Answer:

Explanation:

Title: The Progress of Equality after World War II

Introduction:

The end of World War II marked a turning point in the quest for equality around the world. The war's devastation and the atrocities committed against humanity brought about a collective desire for change and a more equal society. This essay will examine three key events that contributed to the progress of equality after World War II, discussing their causes and the effects they had on the pursuit of equality.

Body:

1. The Universal Declaration of Human Rights:

One significant event that had a profound impact on the quest for equality was the adoption of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) by the United Nations General Assembly in 1948. The causes of this event can be attributed to the horrors witnessed during the war, which ignited a global consensus to safeguard and promote fundamental human rights. The UDHR aimed to provide a universal framework for the protection of human rights, emphasizing equality, non-discrimination, and social justice. Its effects were far-reaching, as it laid the foundation for subsequent legal instruments and inspired numerous social movements advocating for equality and justice.

2. The Civil Rights Movement in the United States:

The Civil Rights Movement in the United States was a watershed moment in the fight against racial discrimination and segregation. Sparked by the struggles of African Americans, this movement gained momentum in the 1950s and 1960s. The causes of this movement can be traced back to the legacy of slavery, racial tensions, and the desire for equality in post-war America. Key events such as the Montgomery Bus Boycott, the March on Washington, and the passage of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 were pivotal in challenging racial inequality and securing legal protections for marginalized communities. The effects of the Civil Rights Movement were profound, leading to desegregation, voting rights reforms, and a significant shift in public opinion regarding racial equality.

3. Feminist Movements and Women's Rights:

The post-war era also witnessed significant advancements in gender equality. The causes of the feminist movements can be attributed to the increased participation of women in the workforce during the war and their subsequent desire for equal rights and opportunities. The second wave feminist movement, which emerged in the 1960s and 1970s, sought to challenge patriarchal norms and secure equal rights for women. Key events such as the publication of Betty Friedan's "The Feminine Mystique," the formation of the National Organization for Women (NOW), and the campaign for equal pay were instrumental in raising awareness and advocating for gender equality. The effects of these movements included legal reforms, increased representation of women in various fields, and the empowerment of women to challenge societal norms and expectations.

Conclusion:

The progress of equality after World War II was marked by significant events that shaped the course of history. The adoption of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the Civil Rights Movement in the United States, and the feminist movements all contributed to the advancement of equality in different spheres. These events were fueled by a shared desire for justice and fairness, driven by the experiences of war and discrimination. While challenges persist, the progress made in the pursuit of equality has laid the groundwork for further advancements and serves as a reminder of the ongoing struggle for a more equitable and inclusive world.

Louis XIV managed to control the nobles of France and their activities by heavily taxing the nobles' estates so they could no longer fund private armies.Louis XIV managed to control the nobles of France and their activities by heavily taxing the nobles' estates so they could no longer fund private armies.

Louis XIV was one of the most powerful kings of France. He ruled for 72 years and is considered one of the most successful monarchs in history. One of the challenges he faced during his reign was controlling the nobles of France. Louis managed to control the nobles of France and their activities by heavily taxing the nobles' estates so they could no longer fund private armies. By doing this, Louis was able to prevent the nobles from challenging his authority. The nobles were also required to live at Versailles, where Louis could distract them and keep an eye on them.

This strategy helped him to prevent any uprisings against him and maintain peace and stability in France.

To know more about Louis XIV visit-

https://brainly.com/question/30488239

#SPJ11

The core teachings of Confucianism include ren (humaneness), li (propriety), xiao (filial piety), junzi (exemplary person), Zhong (loyalty), and education and self-cultivation.

At the core of Confucianism are several key teachings that emphasize ethical behavior, social harmony, and the cultivation of moral character.

know more about Confucianism here:

https://brainly.com/question/28819701

#SPJ8

No, the government of Botswana did not nationalize DeBeers.

Nationalization is a process by which the government takes ownership of private assets. It is often used to refer to industries or businesses that were previously privately owned but are now owned by the government.

When a government nationalizes an industry or business, it usually takes control of all assets, including buildings, equipment, and personnel. The government is also responsible for the day-to-day operations of the business and is accountable for its performance.

The primary reason for nationalizing an industry or business is to gain control over strategic resources or critical infrastructure.In the case of De Beers, it is a private company that is involved in the mining, sorting, and selling of diamonds.

De Beers has never been nationalized by the Botswana government. It is a privately owned company that operates in Botswana, as well as several other countries around the world.

However, the Botswana government has a 15% stake in De Beers through a partnership with De Beers called Debswana. The partnership was formed in 1969 and is still operational today.

Learn more about government : brainly.com/question/1078669

#SPJ11

Yes, the government of Botswana nationalized DeBeers. During the late 1960s, DeBeers signed an agreement with the Botswana government to mine diamonds in the country.

Botswana got a 15% stake in the new venture, Debswana, as well as a royalty rate of 10%.Diamond mining in Botswana is the country's largest industry, contributing over 30% of the country's GDP. Botswana is also the world's largest producer of gem-quality diamonds, thanks to its joint venture with De Beers.Since then, the Botswana government has taken a more active role in managing the country's diamond industry. In 2006, the government of Botswana purchased a 50% stake in De Beers from the Oppenheimer family for $5.1 billion, which it later increased to 85%.The government of Botswana now owns 15% of De Beers, with the remaining 85% owned by the Anglo American Group. The government of Botswana and De Beers have a long-term partnership, with De Beers providing technical expertise and the government of Botswana providing access to its resources.

To know more about  agreement visit :-

https://brainly.com/question/24225827

#SPJ11

Answer:

Federalists defended the Constitution's strengthened national government, with its greater congressional powers, more powerful executive, and independent judiciary. They argued that the new government supported the principles of separation of powers, checks and balances, and federalism.

Explanation:

The Federalists supported the US Constitution because they believed it would create a stronger, more stable, and more effective national government.

The Federalists supported the Constitution for several reasons, including the following:

A stronger government: The Federalists wanted a stronger national government with more authority than the Articles of Confederation, which was considered weak. The Constitution was seen as a solution to this issue since it granted the federal government more power and created three branches with separate powers to maintain a balance.

Representation: They supported the Constitution's approach to representation because it addressed concerns about tyranny. The Framers sought to create a system in which each state would be represented in the Senate, while population-based representation would be used in the House of Representatives.

Separation of powers: The Constitution's separation of powers was another reason why the Federalists supported it. They believed that separating the government's functions into three branches would keep any one branch from becoming too powerful.

Bill of Rights: The Federalists were skeptical of including a Bill of Rights, but they eventually agreed to add one to the Constitution in exchange for ratification. They believed that the document's language and structure would sufficiently protect individual rights and liberties.

To know more about Federalists visit :

brainly.com/question/28880741

#SPJ11

The piano player in Miles Davis' classic 1960 quintet was Herbie Hancock.

Herbie Hancock played the piano in Miles Davis' classic 1960 quintet. This iconic lineup, often referred to as the "Second Great Quintet," included Miles Davis on trumpet, Wayne Shorter on tenor saxophone, Ron Carter on double bass, Tony Williams on drums, and Herbie Hancock on piano. The quintet is widely regarded as one of the most influential and innovative groups in the history of jazz.

Herbie Hancock's role in the quintet was pivotal. His virtuosic and innovative piano playing added a new dimension to the group's sound. He brought a harmonically rich and rhythmically adventurous approach to the music, pushing the boundaries of conventional jazz piano playing. Hancock's improvisational skills and ability to create intricate and complex compositions were a perfect match for Miles Davis' vision of exploring new directions in jazz.

Together, the members of the quintet created a unique and groundbreaking musical language. Their collaborations produced some of the most revered albums in jazz history, including "Miles Smiles," "ESP," and "Nefertiti." The group's collective improvisation, intricate interplay, and forward-thinking compositions redefined the possibilities of small-group jazz and had a lasting impact on the genre.

Learn more about Jazz

brainly.com/question/9962717

#SPJ11

D. the Moors

Spain expelled the Moors in 1492 after centuries of their rule.

In 1492, Spain expelled the Moors after being under their rule for centuries. The Moors were Muslims of North African and Arab descent who had conquered and controlled much of the Iberian Peninsula, including present-day Spain and Portugal, during the period known as the Islamic Golden Age.

However, the Christian kingdoms in the region gradually regained control and launched the Reconquista, a series of campaigns to reclaim the territory. The final victory came in 1492, when the Catholic Monarchs, Ferdinand II of Aragon and Isabella I of Castile, captured the city of Granada and issued the Alhambra Decree, ordering the expulsion of all Muslims and Jews from Spain.

This marked the end of Islamic rule in the Iberian Peninsula and the beginning of a unified Christian kingdom.

Learn more about:Moors

brainly.com/question/30810655

#SPJ11

Mercantilism was an economic system in which nations measured power by accumulating wealth.

Mercantilism was an economic system in which nations measured power by accumulating wealth.

For more such questions on economic system

https://brainly.com/question/12367444

#SPJ8

The American Revolution influenced the French Revolution through its impact on French people, the financial crisis faced by the French government, Enlightenment ideas, the influence of the American Constitution, and the symbolic success of the American Revolution.

The American Revolution contributed to the start of the French Revolution in the following ways:

Learn more about American Revolution: brainly.com/question/18317211

#SPJ11

The American Revolution contributed to the start of the French Revolution in several ways. During the 18th century, France was facing economic, social and political crises.

The country was facing heavy debts due to wars, and the government was unable to meet the needs of the people. This led to widespread poverty, food shortages, and social unrest.The American Revolution inspired the French Revolution in several ways. Firstly, the success of the American Revolution showed that a colonial power could be defeated, even by an underdog. This inspired the French people to fight for their own rights and freedoms. Secondly, the American Revolution promoted the ideals of liberty, equality, and fraternity. These values were embraced by the French revolutionaries and became the motto of the French Revolution. Thirdly, the French Revolution was also inspired by the American Revolution's success in breaking away from a monarchy. The French monarchy was seen as oppressive and corrupt, and the French people wanted to overthrow it.The French Revolution was also influenced by the Enlightenment, a period of intellectual and cultural growth that took place in Europe during the 17th and 18th centuries. The Enlightenment emphasized reason, science, and individualism, and these ideas were embraced by the French Revolutionaries. The French Revolution was a complex event with many causes, and the American Revolution was just one of these causes. However, the American Revolution did play a significant role in inspiring the French people to fight for their own rights and freedoms.

To know more about Revolution visit :-

https://brainly.com/question/29158976

#SPJ11

Answer:

Explanation:

Federalists believed in a strong central government, the Constitution, economic development, pro-British foreign policy, elite leadership, and national security.

As members of Alexander Hamilton's political party, the Federalists believed in several key principles and policies:

1. Strong Central Government: Federalists supported a strong and effective central government that could unify the newly formed United States and maintain stability. They advocated for a robust federal government with powers to address national issues and promote economic development.

2. Constitution and Federalism: Federalists believed in the importance of the United States Constitution as the supreme law of the land. They supported its ratification and interpretation by the federal judiciary, particularly the Supreme Court. Federalists also championed the concept of federalism, which balanced powers between the federal government and the states.

3. Economic Development: Federalists emphasized the importance of a strong national economy. They believed in the value of a diversified economy with a focus on manufacturing, commerce, and trade. Alexander Hamilton, a prominent Federalist, promoted policies such as the establishment of a national bank, protective tariffs, and government subsidies to foster economic growth and promote industrialization.

4. Pro-British Foreign Policy: Federalists generally favored closer ties with Great Britain and believed in maintaining strong commercial and diplomatic relations with the British Empire. They saw Britain as an important trading partner and an ally in promoting stability and economic prosperity.

5. Elite Leadership: Federalists believed in the ability of a well-educated and wealthy elite to govern effectively. They emphasized the importance of experienced leaders, such as lawyers, businessmen, and landowners, in shaping government policies and decision-making processes.

6. National Security: Federalists prioritized national security and defense. They recognized the need for a well-regulated military and a strong navy to protect American interests at home and abroad.

It's important to note that the Federalist Party dissolved in the early 19th century, and Alexander Hamilton himself died in 1804. However, their beliefs and policy positions shaped the early years of the United States and influenced subsequent political ideologies.

Learn more about: Federalists

brainly.com/question/29496480

#SPJ11

The Constitution guarantees trial by jury during criminal cases. This is to prevent unfair treatment and to make sure that justice is served in all criminal cases.

During criminal cases, the Constitution of the United States of America ensures the right to a fair trial and guarantees a trial by jury. This means that individuals who are facing criminal charges will have their case heard in front of a jury of their peers rather than just a judge. The jury is tasked with examining the evidence presented in the case and reaching a verdict based on that evidence. This ensures that the defendant is not at the mercy of the judge and that they have a fair chance to defend themselves against any accusations that have been made.

The Constitution also ensures that all individuals have the right to be represented by an experienced lawyer to defend their rights and interests in court.

To know more about the criminal cases visit:

https://brainly.com/question/1769121

#SPJ11

The correct answer is (c) Teacher-student ratio. Factors that affect the performance of a learner system include motivation, learning environment, and cognitive abilities.

Factors that affect the performance of a learner system include motivation, learning environment, and cognitive abilities. Motivation refers to the willingness of a learner to participate in learning activities, which can be influenced by intrinsic or extrinsic factors. The learning environment, including factors such as lighting, noise, and temperature, can affect the learner's ability to focus and retain information. Cognitive abilities, such as attention span and memory, play a role in a learner's ability to process and retain information.

However, the teacher-student ratio is not a factor that affects the performance of a learner system. While having smaller class sizes may provide more individual attention, it is not a determining factor in a learner's performance. Other factors, such as the teacher's instructional skills and the quality of the curriculum, may have a greater impact on student achievement.

To know more about the learning environment visit:

https://brainly.com/question/30355288

#SPJ11

The response of the French people to the rule of Louis can be compared and contrasted in terms of admiration and discontent.

Louis XIV, also known as the Sun King, ruled France from 1643 to 1715. The response of the French people to his rule can be viewed in two distinct ways. On one hand, Louis was admired for his grandeur, accomplishments, and the centralization of power. Under his rule, France became a dominant European power and saw significant cultural and artistic development. Louis invested in the expansion of the French army, the construction of magnificent palaces like Versailles, and patronized intellectuals and artists, elevating France's reputation globally.

On the other hand, there were discontent and criticism among some segments of the French population. Louis's absolute rule and his pursuit of a centralized monarchy led to resentment from nobles, regional parliaments, and the common people. The heavy taxation imposed to fund wars and extravagant court life placed a burden on the general populace. Additionally, Louis's persecution of religious minorities, such as the revocation of the Edict of Nantes in 1685, sparked unrest and forced many Huguenots to flee the country.

Learn more about Rule of Louis

brainly.com/question/29029695

#SPJ11

The correct option is C. middle class. The middle class made up the majority of those involved in the progressive movement.

The Progressive Era was a period of widespread social activism and political reform across the United States, from the 1890s to the 1920s. The middle class made up the majority of those involved in the progressive movement. Members of the middle class were typically urban professionals, such as lawyers, doctors, teachers, and journalists, who were concerned about social and economic problems resulting from industrialization and urbanization. The progressive movement sought to address a variety of issues, including political corruption, monopolies, worker exploitation, and poor living conditions in urban slums.

Many middle-class progressives believed that the government had a responsibility to regulate the economy and provide for the welfare of its citizens. Some of the key achievements of the progressive movement include the passage of the Pure Food and Drug Act, the establishment of the Federal Reserve System, and the ratification of the 19th Amendment, which gave women the right to vote.

To know more about the Progressive movement visit:

https://brainly.com/question/11150633

#SPJ11

The group most consistently opposed to the Vietnam War by the late 1960s was the "hippies." Which is option B.

Among the options provided, the group that was most consistently opposed to the Vietnam War by the late 1960s was the "hippies." The counterculture movement of the 1960s, which included many young people who identified as hippies, vehemently opposed the Vietnam War.

They organized protests, demonstrations, and acts of civil disobedience to express their dissent and advocate for an end to the war. The hippie movement was characterized by anti-establishment sentiments, a rejection of traditional values, and a focus on peace, love, and nonviolence, which made them particularly critical of the Vietnam War and its perceived injustices.

While individuals within other groups such as doctors, professors, and even some fathers also opposed the war, the hippies were notable for their widespread and consistent opposition to the conflict.

Learn more about: Vietnam War

brainly.com/question/31746600

#SPJ11

The characteristics of the author's style reflected in the given lines are:

C) Sympathetic

In these lines, the author's style is characterized by a deep sense of sympathy towards the protagonist, Gogol. The author directly portrays Gogol's father as the only person who truly understands and acknowledges the struggles Gogol faces due to his name.

The use of phrases such as "didn't take Gogol seriously," "tormented him," "afflicted by the embarrassment of his name," and "constantly questioned it and wished it were otherwise" emphasize the emotional burden Gogol carries. This sympathetic portrayal evokes a sense of understanding and compassion for Gogol's predicament, allowing readers to connect with his experiences on a deeper level.

Learn more about sympathetic

brainly.com/question/7495218

#SPJ11