the primary objective of tort law is to punish wrongdoers and preserve order in the society. true or False

Both an act where a defendant fails to conform to a standard of reasonable care and a failure to act (an omission) that results in a failure to conform to a standard of reasonable care might be a breach of duty resulting in a finding of negligence.

In a negligence case, the plaintiff must prove four elements: duty, breach, causation, and damages. Duty refers to the legal obligation that the defendant had to exercise reasonable care to avoid causing harm to the plaintiff. Breach occurs when the defendant fails to conform to the standard of reasonable care that is expected in the circumstances. This can occur either through an act (such as reckless driving) or through a failure to act (such as failing to put up warning signs in a construction zone). If the plaintiff can prove that the defendant's breach of duty was the cause of their injuries, and that they suffered damages as a result, they may be able to recover compensation in a negligence lawsuit.

To learn more about breach of duty, click here:

https://brainly.com/question/14205107

#SPJ11

During the third stage of the organizational buying decision process, the organization engages in evaluating and selecting suppliers that can provide the required products or services.

This involves comparing the offerings of different suppliers in terms of their quality, price, delivery, and other relevant criteria. The evaluation and selection process may involve issuing requests for proposals (RFPs) or requests for quotations (RFQs), conducting site visits, and reviewing supplier qualifications, references, and past performance. The goal is to identify the supplier that can best meet the organization's needs and provide the most value for its money. Once the supplier is selected, the organization may negotiate terms and conditions of the purchase agreement and issue a purchase order or contract. Effective supplier evaluation and selection can help the organization reduce costs, minimize risks, and improve its overall performance.

To learn more about organization, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/29387081

#SPJ11

The federal law that limits a cardholder's liability for unauthorized use of a card to $50 is the Electronic Fund Transfer Act (EFTA). This law was passed in 1978 and establishes the rights and liabilities of consumers, financial institutions, and electronic fund transfer services. The EFTA covers a wide range of electronic fund transfers, including ATM transactions, point-of-sale purchases, and electronic bill payments.

Under the EFTA, if a cardholder promptly reports the loss or theft of their card, their liability for unauthorized transactions is limited to $50. However, if the cardholder fails to report the loss or theft within two business days after learning of it, their liability can increase to $500. If the cardholder fails to report the loss or theft within 60 days after the account statement is mailed to them, their liability may be unlimited.

It's important for consumers to understand their rights and liabilities under the EFTA to protect themselves from unauthorized transactions. By promptly reporting lost or stolen cards, consumers can limit their liability and avoid financial losses. Financial institutions and electronic fund transfer services also have responsibilities under the EFTA to provide disclosures, investigate disputes, and comply with other consumer protections.
The federal law that limits a cardholder's liability for unauthorized use of a card to $50 is the Electronic Fund Transfer Act (EFTA). Established in 1978, EFTA aims to protect consumers when engaging in electronic fund transfers, such as debit card transactions. Under this law, consumers' liability for unauthorized charges is capped at $50, ensuring limited financial risk in cases of theft or fraud.

Learn more about Electronic Fund Transfer Act (EFTA) here.

brainly.com/question/31071948

#SPJ11

In Florida, joint tenancy must be identified with clear and unambiguous language to show that it was purposeful.

Under Florida law, joint tenancy is a type of co-ownership where two or more people own property together with a right of survivorship. This means that if one of the joint tenants dies, their share of the property automatically passes to the surviving joint tenants, without going through probate.

To create a valid joint tenancy in Florida, the owners must use clear and unambiguous language that expresses their intent to create a joint tenancy. For example, they might state that they "jointly and equally own the property with right of survivorship" or use similar language that clearly indicates their intention to create a joint tenancy.

It's also important to note that joint tenancy in Florida can only be created for certain types of property, including real estate and bank accounts. Other types of property, such as cars and personal belongings, cannot be owned as joint tenants.

By clearly identifying the joint tenancy with unambiguous language, the owners can ensure that their intent is properly documented and that their co-ownership arrangement will be legally recognized in the event of their death.

Learn more about tenancy  here:

https://brainly.com/question/29903790

#SPJ11

The state that became the first to recognize lawful same-sex marriage in 2004 was "Massachusetts." Hence, option C) is correct.

In May 2004, the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court ruled that same-sex couples have the right to marry under the state's constitution. This decision made Massachusetts the first state in the United States to legalize same-sex marriage.

The ruling was met with both praise and criticism, with some celebrating the newfound legal recognition of same-sex couples while others protested the decision. However, the landmark decision paved the way for other states to follow suit in the coming years. Today, same-sex marriage is legal in all 50 states and the District of Columbia.

To learn more about same-sex marriage, visit: https://brainly.com/question/23106691

#SPJ11

Lenders must deliver the Closing Disclosure at least three days before closing. This is mandated by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau's (CFPB) TILA-RESPA Integrated Disclosure (TRID) rule,

which requires lenders to provide borrowers with the Closing Disclosure form at least three business days before the loan closing. This gives borrowers time to review the document and ensure that all of the loan terms and fees are as expected before they sign on the dotted line. Lenders must deliver the Closing Disclosure at least three days before closing. The lender must provide the Closing Disclosure by Friday of the week before closing.

Learn more about  Consumer   here:

https://brainly.com/question/15869639

#SPJ11

The correct answer is True. Discharge in bankruptcy is no defense on any instrument, regardless of the status of the holder. When an individual or business goes through bankruptcy, it is a legal process to help resolve debt issues and provide a fresh financial start.

However, certain obligations, such as negotiable instruments, may not be discharged through bankruptcy. An instrument is a written legal document that represents a specific financial transaction or a promise to pay a specified amount. The holder of an instrument is the individual or entity who possesses the instrument and has the legal right to enforce its terms. While bankruptcy can discharge many types of debts, some obligations, including negotiable instruments, may not be affected by the bankruptcy process. This means that the holder of the instrument can still enforce the debt against the debtor even after the debtor's bankruptcy discharge. The debtor's responsibility to pay the debt under the instrument remains intact, and the holder's right to collect on the instrument is not impaired by the debtor's bankruptcy.

To know more about bankruptcy

https://brainly.com/question/27891821

#SPJ11

A minor is an individual who is under the legal age of adulthood, usually 18 years old. When it comes to contracts and purchases, minors have limited capacity to enter into legally binding agreements.

A minor would have to pay the full contract price for a candy bar (d). This is because a candy bar is considered a necessity, and contracts for necessities are binding on minors. Necessities are items essential for a person's basic needs, such as food, clothing, and shelter. The candy bar, being a food item, falls under this category. Purchases like a car (a), a video game (b), and a house (c) are not considered necessities, and contracts for these items are not legally binding on minors. Minors can potentially disaffirm such contracts, meaning they can choose to void the contract, and in some cases, even return the item for a refund. It's important to note that the rules regarding minors and contract disaffirmation vary across different jurisdictions.

To know more about candy bars

brainly.com/question/3522507

#SPJ11

The Automated Archive System (AAS) is a database that stores a vast amount of criminal history records, arrest information, and other related documents.

This system can be accessed to provide digital images of several types of information, including fingerprint cards, disposition of arrest and court actions, and miscellaneous documents. Fingerprint cards contain detailed information about an individual's fingerprints, such as patterns, arches, and whorls, which are used to identify suspects in criminal investigations. The disposition of arrest and court actions includes information on the outcome of court proceedings, such as convictions, acquittals, or dismissals. Miscellaneous documents may include police reports, witness statements, and other relevant materials related to criminal investigations. Access to the AAS is typically restricted to law enforcement agencies and authorized personnel, who use it to gather information for criminal investigations, background checks, and other purposes. Overall, the AAS provides a valuable resource for law enforcement agencies to access critical information quickly and efficiently.

Learn more about law :

https://brainly.com/question/29553358

#SPJ11

The mode of reward or punishment that reinforces socially expected forms of behavior is called a sanction. A sanction can be positive, like a reward for good behavior, or negative, like a punishment for bad behavior.

Sanctions can be formal or informal, and can come from various sources, such as parents, teachers, peers, or the law.
Sanctions are an important tool for maintaining social order and promoting conformity to societal norms. They help individuals understand what is expected of them in terms of behavior, and provide consequences for deviating from those expectations. Sanctions can also serve as a deterrent for future deviant behavior, as individuals may be less likely to engage in certain behaviors if they know there will be negative consequences.
In summary, a sanction is a mode of reward or punishment that reinforces socially expected forms of behavior. It plays an important role in shaping individual behavior and maintaining social order.

learn more about punishment here

https://brainly.com/question/3289989

#SPJ11

The correct answer is c. Massive. Massive incapacitation is a strategy that aims to imprison a large number of serious offenders, effectively removing them from society.

This approach assumes that by incarcerating a significant portion of the offender population, the overall crime rate will decrease, as potential offenders are deterred by the fear of imprisonment.

This strategy relies on the belief that incapacitation is an effective means of crime control and prioritizes public safety through the removal of offenders from the community.

Learn more about Massive incapacitation here:

https://brainly.com/question/15225465

#SPJ11

False. Under current criminal laws, white-collar crimes such as fraud, embezzlement, and insider trading are punishable by imprisonment.

In fact, the penalties for these types of crimes can be quite severe, with some offenses carrying sentences of more than 20 years in prison. However, the punishment for white-collar crime is not always as straightforward as it is for other types of criminal offenses. For example, fines, community service, and probation may also be imposed in addition to imprisonment.

Additionally, the level of punishment for white-collar crimes may depend on the severity of the offense and the amount of money or property involved. Overall, while white-collar crime may not always be punished with imprisonment alone, it is certainly considered a serious criminal offense under current laws.

Learn more about crimes here:

brainly.com/question/6203610

#SPJ11

Compared to political parties in Europe, parties in the United States have generally seemed weak (c). This is due to several factors that differentiate the American political system from the European ones.

Firstly, the U.S. uses a two-party system, with the Democrats and Republicans dominating politics, whereas European countries often have multiple parties with various ideologies. This results in a more diverse range of political opinions and stronger competition in Europe, making individual parties in the U.S. seem weaker.
Secondly, European political parties often have centralized leadership structures and coherent policy platforms, whereas American parties can be more fragmented. In the U.S., the federal nature of government and the autonomy of state and local parties make it difficult to centralize decision-making or enforce a unified party agenda. This fragmentation can lead to the perception that U.S. parties are weaker and less coherent than their European counterparts. Lastly, European political parties usually have strong connections with various social and interest groups, providing them with a solid foundation of support. In contrast, American parties tend to rely more on individual candidates and their campaigns to connect with voters, which can contribute to the perception of weaker party organizations. Overall, the differences in political systems, party structures, and relationships with social groups make U.S. political parties appear weaker when compared to those in Europe.

Learn more about United States here

https://brainly.com/question/25899399

#SPJ1

The Lanham Act is a federal law that governs trademarks, service marks, and unfair competition. It prohibits false advertising and provides remedies for businesses that have been harmed by such advertising.

In this case, Product A's claim to help you lose 5 pounds in 5 weeks could potentially be actionable under the Lanham Act if it is proven to be false. Similarly, Product X's claim to let you fly would also likely be deemed false and potentially actionable. However, Product Z's claim to be America's favorite drink is subjective and would likely not be considered false advertising under the Lanham Act. Therefore, the answer to this question would be "Products A and X would be actionable under the Lanham Act assuming they are false, while Product Z would not be actionable."

To know more about competition visit:

https://brainly.com/question/15143240

#SPJ11

The name of the early-20th-century policy that reasserted the U.S. position as protector of the Western Hemisphere was the Roosevelt Corollary to the Monroe Doctrine. The Roosevelt Corollary gave the US the right to intervene in Latin American countries for economic and political stability.

It was named after President Theodore Roosevelt, who announced it in 1904 as an extension of the Monroe Doctrine, which was established in 1823.

The Roosevelt Corollary was significant because it declared that the United States had the right to intervene in the affairs of Latin American countries to maintain economic and political stability.

This policy was a response to the growing influence of European powers in Latin America and the threat they posed to U.S. interests. The Roosevelt Corollary justified U.S. intervention in several Latin American countries, including Cuba, the Dominican Republic, and Haiti.

While the policy was intended to promote U.S. economic interests and protect the region from European colonization, it was often criticized for being imperialistic and for violating the sovereignty of Latin American nations.

Despite this criticism, the Roosevelt Corollary remained in effect until the end of World War II and had a significant impact on U.S. foreign policy in the Western Hemisphere.

To know more about Roosevelt Corollary refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/29797674#

#SPJ11

Complete Question:

What is the name and significance of the early-20th century policy that reasserted the U.S. position as protector of the Western Hemisphere, and was an extension of the Monroe Doctrine?

True. For an implied agency to function, implied authority cannot conflict with express authority.

For an implied agency to function, implied authority cannot conflict with express authority. Implied authority refers to authority that is not explicitly granted but is reasonably necessary to carry out the agent's duties, while express authority is authority that is explicitly granted to the agent by the principal. Implied authority must not conflict with express authority, otherwise, it can lead to confusion, disputes, and potential legal issues between the principal and the agent. Therefore, it is important for the principal to clearly define the scope of authority granted to the agent to avoid any conflicts between the implied and express authority.

Know more about implied agency here:

https://brainly.com/question/29627480

#SPJ11

The definition of child abuse considers  victimization by an adult towards a minor. Child abuse involves any form of  activity with a child, including  or exposing a child to inappropriate material.

The consequences of child abuse can be severe and long-lasting, including trauma, depression, anxiety. In many cases, victims of child abuse may experience difficulty in forming and maintaining healthy relationships as they grow into adulthood. It is important for individuals who have experienced child abuse to seek professional help in order to heal from the trauma and move forward in a healthy manner.

Additionally, it is crucial for society as a whole to prioritize the prevention of child abuse through education and awareness programs, as well as holding perpetrators accountable for their actions. Overall, it is our responsibility to protect and support children in order to prevent victimization and promote healthy development.

To know more about victimization

https://brainly.com/question/30612763

#SPJ11

False. "Consideration" refers to something of value (such as money, property, or services) that is given by one party to another in exchange for something else.

In the context of contract law, consideration is a key element of a legally enforceable contract.

Genuine assent, on the other hand, refers to the agreement of all parties to a contract to the same terms and conditions, without any undue influence, fraud, or misrepresentation. Genuine assent is also a key element of a legally enforceable contract.

So while both consideration and genuine assent are important elements of a contract, they refer to different things. Consideration refers to the exchange of value between the parties, while genuine assent refers to the parties' agreement to the terms of the contract without any undue influence or other issues that could undermine their true intentions.

Learn more about services here:

https://brainly.com/question/30418810

#SPJ11

The correct answer is Option D. The major differences between the House and the Senate include all of the following EXCEPT their role in the impeachment process.

The House and the Senate have different roles in the impeachment process. The House has the sole power to initiate impeachment proceedings by bringing charges against a federal official, while the Senate has the sole power to conduct impeachment trials and ultimately decide whether to remove an impeached official from office. The other differences between the two chambers include the length of their terms, the size of the institutions, the method of determining their constituencies, and their power in the legislative process. The House has a two-year term, while Senators serve for six years. The House has 435 voting members, while the Senate has 100. The House is apportioned by population, while the Senate has two Senators per state. In the legislative process, the House has the exclusive power to initiate revenue bills, while the Senate has the exclusive power to approve presidential nominations and treaties.

Know more about the House here:

https://brainly.com/question/1751632

#SPJ11

When a committee chair "pigeonholes" a bill in the Texas legislature, it means that they have essentially set the bill aside and do not plan to bring it up for a vote or further consideration. The bill is effectively dead, unless the committee chair changes their mind and decides to bring it back for discussion and potential passage.

This can be frustrating for those who supported the bill, as it may mean that their efforts to promote the legislation are ultimately fruitless. However, it is ultimately up to the committee chair to decide which bills are given further consideration, and which ones are not.

In the Texas Legislature, when a committee chair "pigeonholes" a bill, the bill essentially gets stalled in the committee process. Pigeonholing refers to the action of the committee chair intentionally delaying or preventing a bill from moving forward for various reasons, such as political differences or workload prioritization. As a result, the bill does not receive further consideration, discussion, or a vote in the committee, hindering its progress towards becoming a law. In this scenario, the pigeonholed bill has a significantly lower chance of advancing in the legislative process, and it often remains stuck until the end of the legislative session.

To know more about Legislature visit-

https://brainly.com/question/530410

#SPJ11

An investor who sells an apartment house can use a 1031 exchange to buy a D. duplex, office building, or warehouse.

However, they cannot only buy an office building or warehouse using this type of exchange. A 1031 exchange allows an investor to defer paying capital gains taxes on the sale of a property by using the proceeds to purchase a like-kind property. The key requirement is that the replacement property must be of the same nature, character, or class as the property being sold. A duplex is considered a like-kind property to an apartment house, as they are both residential properties. An office building or warehouse is considered like-kind to an apartment house because they are all commercial properties. However, an investor cannot only purchase an office building or warehouse with the proceeds of the sale of an apartment house, as the replacement property must be of equal or greater value to the property being sold. Therefore, the investor must purchase a like-kind property that is equal to or greater in value than the apartment house, which includes a duplex, office building, or warehouse.

Learn more about investor :

https://brainly.com/question/31888450

#SPJ11

The three police selection are integrity, intelligence, and interpersonal skills. If we were to choose one of these i's that does not belong, it would be intelligence.

These are considered the most important qualities that a police officer must possess to serve the community effectively. Integrity is crucial because police officers must be trustworthy and demonstrate high moral and ethical standards. Intelligence is necessary for police officers to understand the complexities of the law and apply it in different situations. Interpersonal skills are essential for police officers to communicate effectively with people from diverse backgrounds and resolve conflicts peacefully.
However, if we were to choose one of these i's that does not belong, it would be intelligence. This is not to say that intelligence is not important in police work, but rather, the other two i's are considered more critical. Without integrity, police officers cannot be trusted to serve and protect the public. Without interpersonal skills, police officers would not be able to engage with people effectively and build positive relationships with the community. Therefore, although all three i's are essential, if we had to pick one that does not belong, it would be intelligence.

To know more about police selection visit:

https://brainly.com/question/19515317

#SPJ11

A writing is not always necessary for a valid contract to be formed. Mutual assent, legality of purpose, and competent parties are essential elements of a contract.

A valid contract requires three essential elements: mutual assent, legality of purpose, and competent parties. Mutual assent means that both parties have agreed to the terms of the contract, typically through an offer and acceptance. Legality of purpose refers to the requirement that the contract must not involve illegal activities or violate public policy. Competent parties mean that both parties must have the legal capacity to enter into a contract, which includes being of a certain age and possessing sound mental capacity.

"A writing" is not always necessary for a valid contract to be formed. While some contracts, such as real estate transactions or contracts that cannot be performed within a year, do require a written agreement under the Statute of Frauds, many contracts can be legally binding without being in writing. Oral agreements and implied contracts, where the parties' actions demonstrate their intention to enter into a contract, can also be valid and enforceable. However, it is often recommended to have a written contract to avoid misunderstandings and provide clear evidence of the agreement's terms.

Learn more about valid contracts here: brainly.com/question/27940290

#SPJ11

As a general rule, a licensee should provide a seller with a copy of the listing agreement as soon as it has been signed and executed by all parties involved. This is typically done in person, and the licensee will often bring a copy of the agreement with them to the signing appointment.

In some cases, however, it may not be possible for the licensee to provide the seller with a copy of the agreement at the time of signing. For example, if the seller is out of town or unavailable, the licensee may need to mail or email a copy of the agreement to the seller after the fact.In most states, there is no specific time frame within which the licensee must provide the seller with a copy of the listing agreement. However, it is generally considered best practice to provide the seller with a copy of the agreement as soon as possible to ensure that everyone is on the same page and there is no confusion about the terms of the agreement.Additionally, some states do have specific requirements regarding the delivery of the listing agreement. For example, in California, the licensee is required to provide the seller with a copy of the signed listing agreement within 24 hours of execution.

To know more about licensee visit:

brainly.com/question/14342074

#SPJ11

Tires on a vehicle should be rotated every 5,000-7,500 miles, or as recommended by the manufacturer.

Velocity is the overall distance an item travels in a given amount of time. Both the size and the direction of the moving item must be considered. A metre per second is used to measure speed. The infinitesimal rate of change of displacement with respect to time is another way to describe it vehicle. A metre per second is the commonly used unit for velocity. As stated in the problem, a certain vehicle's tyre radius is  if the tyres rotate five times each second.

Since there is no horizontal motion, the projectile's horizontal component stays the same. At every position, the vertical component is different.The magnitude of a projectile's vertical velocity rises as it falls, but its horizontal velocity remains constant.

Learn more about Velocity here

https://brainly.com/question/1823230

#SPJ11

When the defendant claims that they did not commit any wrongdoing, this defense is called a general denial or main answer.

This defense is used to challenge the plaintiff's claims and force them to provide evidence to prove their case. In a civil case, a main answer is typically filed along with other defenses, such as statute of limitations or lack of jurisdiction.

The defendant may also use this defense in criminal cases to challenge the prosecution's evidence and create reasonable doubt in the minds of the jurors.

In essence, a main answer is a legal tactic that allows the defendant to dispute the allegations made against them and shift the burden of proof onto the plaintiff or prosecution.

To know more about criminal cases click on below link:

https://brainly.com/question/30278728#

#SPJ11

True. The violation of a statute that proximately causes an injury is termed as negligence per se.

Negligence per se occurs when an individual or entity violates a statute, regulation, or ordinance, and that violation results in injury to another person. When the violation of the law has occurred, the plaintiff does not need to prove the standard of care that was breached, as the violation of the law is enough to prove negligence.

Negligence per se is a legal term used in tort law to describe a situation where the violation of a statute or regulation is considered evidence of a defendant's negligence. It is based on the principle that if a defendant violates a statute or regulation designed to protect a particular class of people, and that violation results in harm to a member of that class, then the defendant has committed negligence per se.

Learn more about Negligence per se here:

https://brainly.com/question/31913716

#SPJ11

It can be difficult to determine whether districts are drawn for racial reasons or partisan reasons. The issue of drawing district lines using racial considerations first came about in the wake of the Civil War. These  two statements are true.

For further context:

Race cannot be the predominant factor in drawing district lines: This statement is not entirely accurate. The legal standard regarding the use of race in redistricting has evolved over time. While race cannot be the sole or predominant factor in drawing district lines, there are certain circumstances where race can be considered as one of the factors, along with other relevant factors, such as complying with the Voting Rights Act or avoiding racial vote dilution.

The Court mandates that some districts be majority African American or Latino to increase representation in Congress from those groups: This statement is also not entirely accurate. The Court does not mandate that districts must be majority African American or Latino. However, there have been legal challenges and court cases related to the Voting Rights Act, which seeks to protect minority voting rights. In some cases, the creation of majority-minority districts has been deemed necessary to prevent racial vote dilution and ensure fair representation for minority groups.

It's important to note that redistricting and the use of race in drawing district lines are complex and can vary depending on legal frameworks, court decisions, and jurisdiction-specific considerations. Laws and regulations regarding redistricting can differ between countries and even within different states or regions.

Learn more about Civil War here:

https://brainly.com/question/11874600

#SPJ11

The correct answer is a) the French and British demanded enormous reparations payments from Germany. After World War I, many European countries were heavily indebted to the United States, which had provided loans and other forms of financial assistance during the conflict. However, the U.S. government insisted that its allies repay these debts in full, rather than forgiving them or reducing the amount owed.

This insistence on repayment put a significant strain on the economies of European countries, particularly France and Britain, which had suffered enormous losses during the war. In order to repay their debts to the U.S., these countries demanded large sums of money from Germany, which was seen as the primary aggressor in the conflict.

The resulting reparations payments imposed on Germany were so large that they caused significant economic instability in the country, leading to drastic inflation and eventually contributing to the rise of the Nazi party and the outbreak of World War II.

So, option a) is the correct answer because the insistence of the U.S. on repayment of its war debts indirectly led to the imposition of huge reparations payments on Germany by its former allies, which had serious consequences for Germany and for Europe as a whole.

Learn more about reparation payments, here:

brainly.com/question/30122585

#SPJ11

Prospective judgment is voting based upon the perceived abilities and promises of a candidate for a particular office.

It involves an assessment of the candidate's character, policy proposals, and competence in delivering on those proposals. Voters who use prospective judgment consider the candidate's qualifications and goals for the future as the basis for their decision, rather than their past performance or reputation. They evaluate the candidate's potential to improve the conditions in the community, state or country they are seeking to represent.

In contrast, retrospective judgment is voting based on the candidate's past performance in office, such as the fulfillment of campaign promises, voting records, or overall track record. Prospective judgment, therefore, involves a more forward-looking perspective, as opposed to retrospective judgment, which is focused on the candidate's history and achievements.

To learn more about assessment  click here

brainly.com/question/28046286

#SPJ11