The probability at least one computer is available at any time in a computer lab is 0.75. a. Susan makes 16 visits to the computer lab. Calculate the probability that at least one computer is available on exactly 10 occasions. b. David makes 10 visits to the computer lab. Calculate the probability that at least one computer is available on 5 or more occasions.

The increase in equilibrium GDP would be 125.

To calculate the increase in equilibrium GDP when planned investment increases from 20 to 45, we need to consider the multiplier effect. The multiplier is determined by the marginal propensity to consume (MPC), which is the fraction of each additional dollar of income that is spent on consumption.

In this case, the consumption function is given as C = 357 + 0.8Y, where Y represents GDP. The MPC can be calculated by taking the coefficient of Y, which is 0.8.

The multiplier (K) can be calculated using the formula: K = 1 / (1 - MPC).

MPC = 0.8

K = 1 / (1 - 0.8) = 1 / 0.2 = 5

The increase in equilibrium GDP (∆Y) is given by: ∆Y = ∆I * K, where ∆I represents the change in planned investment.

∆I = 45 - 20 = 25

∆Y = 25 * 5 = 125

Therefore, the increase in equilibrium GDP would be 125.

To learn more about equilibrium GDP

https://brainly.com/question/32297029

#SPJ11

To find a formula for the moose population, P, in terms of t, the years since 1990, we need to determine the rate of change in population over time. Given two data points, we can use the slope-intercept form of a linear equation.

Let t = 0 correspond to the year 1990. We have two points: (4, 280, 1994) and (8, 4800, 1998). Using the formula for the slope of a line, m = (y2 - y1) / (x2 - x1), we can calculate the slope:

m = (4800 - 4280) / (8 - 4)

Simplifying, we get m = 130 moose per year. Now, we can use the point-slope form of a linear equation to find the formula:

P - 4280 = 130(t - 4)

Simplifying further, we get P(t) = 130t + 4120.

To predict the moose population in 2006 (t = 16), we substitute t = 16 into the formula:

P(16) = 130(16) + 4120 = 2080 + 4120 = 6200.

Therefore, the model predicts the moose population to be 6200 in 2006.

To know more about linear equations click here: brainly.com/question/32634451

#SPJ11

The gradient field F is (20[tex]x^4[/tex]y - [tex]y^5[/tex]) i + (4[tex]x^5[/tex] - 5[tex]y^4[/tex]x) j.

To find the gradient field F = ∇φ for the potential function φ = 4[tex]x^5[/tex]y - [tex]y^5[/tex]x, we need to compute the partial derivatives of φ with respect to x and y.

∂φ/∂x = ∂(4[tex]x^5[/tex]y - [tex]y^5[/tex]x)/∂x

= 20[tex]x^4[/tex]y - [tex]y^5[/tex]

∂φ/∂y = ∂(4[tex]x^5[/tex]y - [tex]y^5[/tex]x)/∂y

= 4[tex]x^5[/tex] - 5[tex]y^4[/tex]x

Therefore, the gradient field F = ∇φ is given by:

F = (∂φ/∂x) i + (∂φ/∂y) j

= (20[tex]x^4[/tex]y - [tex]y^5[/tex]) i + ( 4[tex]x^5[/tex] - 5[tex]y^4[/tex]x) j

So, the gradient field F = (∂φ/∂x) i + (∂φ/∂y) j is equal to (20[tex]x^4[/tex]y - [tex]y^5[/tex]) i + (4[tex]x^5[/tex] - 5[tex]y^4[/tex]x) j.

To learn more about gradient here:

https://brainly.com/question/29751488

#SPJ4

The boat will coast approximately 322 feet before coming to a complete stop. (Rounded to the nearest whole number.)

To find how far the boat will coast, we need to integrate the differential equation dv/dt = -kv, where v represents the velocity of the boat and k is the constant of proportionality.

Integrating both sides of the equation gives:

∫(1/v) dv = ∫(-k) dt

Applying the definite integral from the initial velocity v₀ to the final velocity v, and from the initial time t₀ to the final time t, we have:

ln|v| = -kt + C

To find the constant of integration C, we can use the given initial condition. When the motorboat's motor suddenly quits, the velocity is 39 ft/s at t = 0. Substituting these values into th function with respect to time:

∫v dt = ∫e^(-kt + ln|39|) dt

Integrating from t = 0 to t = 9, we get:

∫(v dt) = ∫(39e^(-kt) dt)

To solve this integral, we need to substitute u = -kt:

∫(v dt) = -39/k ∫(e^u du)

Integrating e^u with respect to u, we have:

∫(v dt) = -39/k * e^u + C₂

Now, evaluating the integral from t = 0 to t = 9:

∫(v dt) = -39/k * (e^(-k(9)) - e^(-k(0)))

Since we have the equation ln|v| = -kt + ln|39|, we can substitute:

∫(v dt) = -39/k * (e^(-9ln|v|/ln|39|) - 1)

Using the given values, we can solve for the distance the boat will coast:

∫(v dt) = -39/k * (e^(-9ln|20|/ln|39|) - 1) ≈ 322 feet

Therefore, the boat will coast approximately 322 feet.

To learn more about equation , click here:

brainly.com/question/30265549

#SPJ1

The equation of the tangent line at (-1, 2) is y = (2/5)x + 12/5.

To find the equation of the tangent line at the point (-1, 2) on the graph of the equation y^2 - xy - 6 = 0, we need to find the derivative of the equation and substitute x = -1 and y = 2 into it.

First, let's find the derivative of the equation with respect to x:

Differentiating y^2 - xy - 6 = 0 implicitly with respect to x, we get:

2yy' - y - xy' = 0

Now, substitute x = -1 and y = 2 into the derivative equation:

2(2)y' - 2 - (-1)y' = 0

4y' + y' = 2

5y' = 2

y' = 2/5

The derivative of y with respect to x is 2/5 at the point (-1, 2).

Now we can use the point-slope form of a line to find the equation of the tangent line. The point-slope form is:

y - y1 = m(x - x1)

Substituting x = -1, y = 2, and m = 2/5 into the equation, we get:

y - 2 = (2/5)(x - (-1))

y - 2 = (2/5)(x + 1)

Simplifying further:

y - 2 = (2/5)x + 2/5

y = (2/5)x + 2/5 + 10/5

y = (2/5)x + 12/5

Therefore, the equation of the tangent line at (-1, 2) is y = (2/5)x + 12/5.

To know more about equation visit:

brainly.com/question/29657983

#SPJ11

the expected value of X(6-X) using the given PMF is 7.

To find the expected value of the expression X(6-X) using the given probability mass function (PMF), we need to calculate the expected value using the formula:

E(X(6-X)) = Σ(x(6-x) * p(x))

Where Σ represents the summation over all possible values of X.

Let's calculate the expected value step by step:

E(X(6-X)) = (1/15)(1(6-1)) + (2/15)(2(6-2)) + (3/15)(3(6-3)) + (4/15)(4(6-4)) + (5/15)(5(6-5))

E(X(6-X)) = (1/15)(5) + (2/15)(8) + (3/15)(9) + (4/15)(8) + (5/15)(5)

E(X(6-X)) = (1/15)(5 + 16 + 27 + 32 + 25)

E(X(6-X)) = (1/15)(105)

E(X(6-X)) = 105/15

E(X(6-X)) = 7

To know more about function visit:

brainly.com/question/30721594

#SPJ11

Answer:

20/100 x 100

= 20

116.1/100 x 62

= 71.982

=72[round off]

hence, 72 + 20 = 92

hence the answer b)116.1% is correct

(a) A = 60°

(b) B = 6x

Solutions to 5sin(2x) - 2cos(x) = 0 are approximately:

x = π/2, 0.201, 0.94, 5.34, 6.08

(a) Using the double-angle formula for cosine, we can simplify the expression cos^2(30°) - sin^2(30°) as follows:

cos^2(30°) - sin^2(30°) = cos(2 * 30°)

                      = cos(60°)

Therefore, A = 60°.

(b) Similar to part (a), we can use the double-angle formula for cosine to simplify the expression cos^2(3x) - sin^2(3x):

cos^2(3x) - sin^2(3x) = cos(2 * 3x)

                     = cos(6x)

Therefore, B = 6x.

To solve the equation 5sin(2x) - 2cos(x) = 0, we can rearrange it as follows:

5sin(2x) - 2cos(x) = 0

5 * 2sin(x)cos(x) - 2cos(x) = 0

10sin(x)cos(x) - 2cos(x) = 0

Factor out cos(x):

cos(x) * (10sin(x) - 2) = 0

Now, set each factor equal to zero and solve for x:

cos(x) = 0       or      10sin(x) - 2 = 0

For cos(x) = 0, x can take values at multiples of π/2.

For 10sin(x) - 2 = 0, solve for sin(x):

10sin(x) = 2

sin(x) = 2/10

sin(x) = 1/5

Using the unit circle or a calculator, we find the solutions for sin(x) = 1/5 to be approximately x = 0.201, x = 0.94, x = 5.34, and x = 6.08.

Combining all the solutions, we have:

x = π/2, 0.201, 0.94, 5.34, 6.08

To know more about the double-angle formula for cosine, refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/30402422#

#SPJ11

The equation of the tangent line at x=0 is y = x.

To find the equation of the tangent line at the given value of x, we need to find the derivative of the function y with respect to x and evaluate it at x=0.

Taking the derivative of y=∫[0 to x] sin(2t^2+π/2) dt using the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, we get:

dy/dx = sin(2x^2+π/2)

Now we can evaluate this derivative at x=0:

dy/dx |x=0 = sin(2(0)^2+π/2)

        = sin(π/2)

        = 1

So, the slope of the tangent line at x=0 is 1.

To find the equation of the tangent line, we also need a point on the line. In this case, the point is (0, y(x=0)).

Substituting x=0 into the original function y=∫[0 to x] sin(2t^2+π/2) dt, we get:

y(x=0) = ∫[0 to 0] sin(2t^2+π/2) dt

      = 0

Therefore, the point on the tangent line is (0, 0).

Using the point-slope form of a linear equation, we can write the equation of the tangent line:

y - y1 = m(x - x1)

where m is the slope and (x1, y1) is a point on the line.

Plugging in the values, we have:

y - 0 = 1(x - 0)

Simplifying, we get:

y = x

So, the equation of the tangent line at x=0 is y = x.

Learn more about Fundamental Theorem of Calculus here:

brainly.com/question/30761130

#SPJ11

The expression for the difference between four times a number and three times the number is 'x'.

The expression for the difference between four times a number and three times the number can be represented algebraically as:

4x - 3x

In this expression, 'x' represents the unknown number. Multiplying 'x' by 4 gives us four times the number, and multiplying 'x' by 3 gives us three times the number. Taking the difference between these two quantities, we subtract 3x from 4x.

Simplifying the expression, we have:

4x - 3x = x

Therefore, the expression for the difference between four times a number and three times the number is 'x'.

for such more question on expression

https://brainly.com/question/4344214

#SPJ8

With 99% confidence that the population standard deviation of the age (in weeks) at which babies first crawl lies between 2.857 and 21.442.

The given data represents the age (in weeks) at which babies first crawl based on a survey of 12 mothers. The data is normally distributed and s=9.858 weeks. We have to construct and interpret a 99% confidence interval for the population standard deviation of the age (in weeks) at which babies first crawl.

The sample standard deviation (s) = 9.858 weeks.

n = 12 degrees of freedom = n - 1 = 11

For a 99% confidence interval, the alpha level (α) is 1 - 0.99 = 0.01/2 = 0.005 (two-tailed test).

Using the Chi-Square distribution table with 11 degrees of freedom, the value of chi-square at 0.005 level of significance is 27.204. The formula for the confidence interval for the population standard deviation is given as: [(n - 1)s^2/χ^2(α/2), (n - 1)s^2/χ^2(1- α/2)] where s = sample standard deviation, χ^2 = chi-square value from the Chi-Square distribution table with (n - 1) degrees of freedom, and α = level of significance.

Substituting the values in the above formula, we get:

[(n - 1)s^2/χ^2(α/2), (n - 1)s^2/χ^2(1- α/2)][(11) (9.858)^2 / 27.204, (11) (9.858)^2 / 5.812]

Hence the 99% confidence interval for the population standard deviation of the age (in weeks) at which babies first crawl is: (2.857, 21.442)

Therefore, we can say with 99% confidence that the population standard deviation of the age (in weeks) at which babies first crawl lies between 2.857 and 21.442.

Know more about confidence interval here,

https://brainly.com/question/32546207

#SPJ11

The derivative of f(t) = (-3t² + (1/3)√4t)(t² + 24√t) is given by f'(t) = (-6t)(t² + 24√t) + (-3t² + (1/3)√4t)(2t + 12/√t). To find the derivative of the function f(t) = (-3t² + (1/3)√4t)(t² + 24√t), we can use the product rule of differentiation.

Let's label the two factors as u and v:

u = -3t² + (1/3)√4t

v = t² + 24√t

To differentiate f(t), we apply the product rule:

f'(t) = u'v + uv'

To find the derivative of u, we can differentiate each term separately:

u' = d/dt (-3t²) + d/dt ((1/3)√4t)

Differentiating -3t²:

u' = -6t

Differentiating (1/3)√4t:

u' = (1/3) * d/dt (√4t)

Applying the chain rule:

u' = (1/3) * (1/2√4t) * d/dt (4t)

Simplifying:

u' = (1/6√t)

Now, let's find the derivative of v:

v' = d/dt (t²) + d/dt (24√t)

Differentiating t²:

v' = 2t

Differentiating 24√t:

v' = 24 * (1/2√t)

Simplifying:

v' = 12/√t

Now we can substitute the derivatives u' and v' back into the product rule formula:

f'(t) = u'v + uv'

f'(t) = (-6t)(t² + 24√t) + (-3t² + (1/3)√4t)(2t + 12/√t)

Hence, the derivative of f(t) = (-3t² + (1/3)√4t)(t² + 24√t) is given by f'(t) = (-6t)(t² + 24√t) + (-3t² + (1/3)√4t)(2t + 12/√t).

Learn more about product rule here:

https://brainly.com/question/29198114

#SPJ11

Jim flies northeast from airport A to airport C, with a 45° angle. To find the distance between C and A, we can use the formula (x + y) / 441 = 1.....(1). Substituting the values, we get (441 - x)² + y² = CD² (1 + tan² 53°50') + (441 - x)². Substituting the values, we get (441 - x)² + y² = c², which is the distance between C and A. Solving, we get x = 208 km (approximately).

Given that Airports A and B are 441 km apart, on an east-west line. Jim flies in a northeast direction from A to airport C. From C he flies 306 km on a bearing of 126°10' to B. We need to find how far C is from A.Let the distance between C and A be x km. From the given figure we can write:tan 45° = (x + y) / 441Since Jim is flying in a northeast direction from A to C, it means that the angle BAC is 45°.So,

(x + y) / 441 = 1 .....(1)

x + y = 441 .....(2)

Now, in triangle BDC,

tan (180° - 126°10') = BD / CD

or, tan 53°50' = BD / CD

or, BD = CD x tan 53°50'

Again, in triangle BAC,

BD² + y² = (441 - x)²

Adding equations (2) and (3), we get:

(441 - x)² + y² = CD² (1 + tan² 53°50') + (441 - x)²

On substituting the values, we get:

(441 - x)² + y² = CD² (1 + tan² 53°50') + (441 - x)²

(306 / cos 53°50')² (1 + tan² 53°50') + (441 - x)² = 76584.38 + (441 - x)²

On comparing with a² + b² = c²,

we get:(441 - x)² + y² = c²

Where, a = (306 / cos 53°50') (1 + tan² 53°50') = 76584.38, b = 441 - x And, c is the distance between C and A.

Now, substituting the values in the above formula we get:

(441 - x)² + y²

76584.38(76584.38 - 2x) + x² - 882x + 441² = 0

On solving we get, x = 208 km (approx)

Hence, the distance between C and A is 208 km (approx).

To know more about distance Visit:

https://brainly.com/question/13034462

#SPJ11

After deducting the amounts for Federal tax, Social Security, and other deductions, the net pay for working 40 hours at an hourly wage of $8.95 is $276.61. Option A.

To calculate the net pay, we need to subtract the deductions from the gross pay.

Given:

Hours worked = 40

Hourly wage = $8.95

Federal tax deduction = $35.24

Social Security deduction = $24.82

Other deductions = $21.33

First, let's calculate the gross pay:

Gross pay = Hours worked * Hourly wage

Gross pay = 40 * $8.95

Gross pay = $358

Next, let's calculate the total deductions:

Total deductions = Federal tax + Social Security + Other deductions

Total deductions = $35.24 + $24.82 + $21.33

Total deductions = $81.39

Finally, let's calculate the net pay:

Net pay = Gross pay - Total deductions

Net pay = $358 - $81.39

Net pay = $276.61

Therefore, the net pay for 40 hours worked at $8.95 an hour with deductions for Federal tax of $35.24, Social Security of $24.82, and other deductions of $21.33 is $276.61. SO Option A is correct.

For more question on deductions visit:

https://brainly.com/question/29307306

#SPJ8

Note the correct and the complete question is

What is the net pay for 40 hours worked at $8.95 an hour with deductions for Federal tax of $35.24, Social Security of $24.82, and other deductions of $21.33?

A.) $276.61

B.) $326.25

C.) $358.00

D.) $368.91

(a) The critical numbers and discontinuities are x = 0, x = -9, and x = 9.(b) The function increasing on (-9, 0) and (9, ∞), and decreasing on  (-∞, -9) and (0, 9). (c) Relative minimum (-9, f(-9)) and relative maximum (9, f(9)).

(a) The critical numbers of the function f(x) can be found by setting the denominator equal to zero since it would make the function undefined. Solving [tex]x^{2}[/tex] - 81 = 0, we get x = -9 and x = 9 as the critical numbers. Additionally, x = 0 is also a critical number since it makes the numerator zero.

(b) To determine the intervals of increase and decrease, we can analyze the sign of the first derivative. Taking the derivative of f(x) with respect to x, we get f'(x) = (2x([tex]x^{2}[/tex] - 81) - [tex]x^{2}[/tex](2x))/([tex]x^{2}[/tex] - 81)^2. Simplifying this expression, we find f'(x) = -162x/([tex]x^{2}[/tex] - 81)^2.

From the first derivative, we can observe that f'(x) is negative for x < -9, positive for -9 < x < 0, negative for 0 < x < 9, and positive for x > 9. This indicates that f(x) is decreasing on the intervals (-∞, -9) and (0, 9), and increasing on the intervals (-9, 0) and (9, ∞).

(c) Applying the First Derivative Test, we can identify the relative extremum. Since f(x) is decreasing on the interval (-∞, -9) and increasing on the interval (-9, 0), we have a relative minimum at x = -9. Similarly, since f(x) is increasing on the interval (9, ∞), we have a relative maximum at x = 9. The coordinates for the relative extremum are:

Relative minimum: (x, y) = (-9, f(-9))

Relative maximum: (x, y) = (9, f(9))

Learn more about critical numbers here:

https://brainly.com/question/31339061

#SPJ11

In the context of the ㏒y vs ㏒x graph, with a slope of 3 and a y-intercept of 2, the equation that characterizes the relationship between y and x is [tex]y=Cx^{3}[/tex], where C is a constant that equals 100. This equation signifies a power-law relationship between the logarithms of y and x.

If the slope of the ㏒y vs ㏒x graph is 3 and the y-intercept is 2, the equation that describes the relationship between y and x is [tex]y=Cx^{3}[/tex], where C is a constant. The general equation for a straight line is y = mx + c, where m is the slope of the line and c is the y-intercept.

In this case, the slope of the log y vs log x graph is 3, which means that m = 3.

The y-intercept is 2, which means that c = 2.

Substituting these values into the equation for a straight line gives y = 3x + 2.

However, this is not the equation that describes the relationship between y and x in the log y vs log x graph.

We need to consider that we are dealing with logarithmic scales. By taking the logarithm of both sides of the equation [tex]y=Cx^{3}[/tex] (where C is a constant), we obtain [tex]logy=log(Cx^{3})[/tex].

Using the properties of logarithms, we can simplify this expression: ㏒y = ㏒C + ㏒[tex]x^{3}[/tex].

Applying the power rule of logarithms, ㏒y = ㏒C + 3㏒x.

Comparing this equation to the general form y = mx + c, we can see that the slope is 3 (m = 3) and the y-intercept is ㏒C (c = ㏒C).

Since we know that the y-intercept is 2, we have ㏒C = 2. Solving for C, we take the inverse logarithm (base 10) of both sides: [tex]C=10^{logC}\\ =10^{2}\\ =100[/tex].

Therefore, the equation that describes the relationship between y and x in the ㏒y vs ㏒x graph is y = 100x³.

To Know more about slope visit:

brainly.com/question/20999308

#SPJ11

a) Probability that a randomly selected male from the population has a sleeping disorder:

Given that the probability of having sleep disorder in males is 71%.

Hence, the required probability is 0.71 or 71%.

b) Probability that a randomly selected female from the population has a sleeping disorder:

Given that the probability of having sleep disorder in females is 26%.

Hence, the required probability is 0.26 or 26%.

c) A randomly selected individual from the population is known to have a sleeping disorder. What is the probability that this individual is a male?

Given,Probability of having sleep disorder for males (P(M)) = 71% or 0.71

Probability of having sleep disorder for females (P(F)) = 26% or 0.26

Assume equal number of males and females in the population.P(M) = P(F) = 0.5 or 50%

Probability that a randomly selected individual is a male given that he/she has a sleeping disorder (P(M|D)) is calculated as follows:

P(M|D) = P(M ∩ D) / P(D) where D represents the event that the person has a sleep disorder.

P(M ∩ D) is the probability that the person is male and has a sleep disorder.

P(D) is the probability that the person has a sleep disorder.

P(D) = P(M) * P(D|M) + P(F) * P(D|F) where P(D|M) and P(D|F) are the conditional probabilities of having a sleep disorder, given that the person is male and female respectively.

They are already given as 0.71 and 0.26, respectively.

Now, substituting the given values in the above formula:

P(D) = 0.5 * 0.71 + 0.5 * 0.26P(D) = 0.485 or 48.5%

P(M ∩ D) is the probability that the person is male and has a sleep disorder.

P(M ∩ D) = P(D|M) * P(M)

P(M ∩ D) = 0.71 * 0.5

P(M ∩ D) = 0.355 or 35.5%

Thus, the probability that the person is male given that he/she has a sleeping disorder is:

P(M|D) = P(M ∩ D) / P(D) = 0.355 / 0.485 = 0.731 = 73.1%

Therefore, the probability that the individual is a male given he/she has a sleep disorder is 0.731 or 73.1%.

Let us know more about probability : https://brainly.com/question/31828911.

#SPJ11

The value of H'(x) is (1/2√(x - x²)) * (1 - 2x) + 1/√(1 - x).

the estimated value of f(3.1) using linear approximation is -3.5.

1. To find and simplify H′(x) for the function H(x) = √(x - x²) + arcsin(√x), we need to find the derivative of each term separately and then combine them.

Let's differentiate each term step by step:

a) Differentiating √(x - x²):

To differentiate √(x - x²), we can use the chain rule. Let's consider u = x - x². The derivative of u with respect to x is du/dx = 1 - 2x.

Now, we can differentiate √u with respect to u, which is 1/2√u. Combining these results using the chain rule, we get:

d/dx [√(x - x²)] = (1/2√u) * (1 - 2x) = (1/2√(x - x²)) * (1 - 2x).

b) Differentiating arcsin(√x):

The derivative of arcsin(u) with respect to u is 1/√(1 - u²). In this case, u = √x. So, the derivative is 1/√(1 - (√x)²) = 1/√(1 - x).

Now, let's combine the derivatives:

H'(x) = (1/2√(x - x²)) * (1 - 2x) + 1/√(1 - x).

2. To estimate f(3.1) using linear approximation, given that f(3) = -4 and f′(x) = √(x² + 16​):

The linear approximation formula is:

L(x) = f(a) + f'(a)(x - a),

where a is the value at which we know the function and its derivative (in this case, a = 3), and L(x) is the linear approximation of the function.

Using the given information:

f(3) = -4, and f'(x) = √(x² + 16​),

we can calculate the linear approximation at x = 3.1 as follows:

L(3.1) = f(3) + f'(3)(3.1 - 3)

      = -4 + √(3² + 16​)(3.1 - 3).

Now, substitute the values and calculate the result:

L(3.1) = -4 + √(9 + 16)(3.1 - 3)

      = -4 + √(25)(0.1)

      = -4 + 5(0.1)

      = -4 + 0.5

      = -3.5.

Therefore, the estimated value of f(3.1) using linear approximation is -3.5.

Learn more about Derivative here

https://brainly.com/question/25324584

#SPJ4

Complete question is below

1. Differentiate the following functions as indicated. (a) Find and simplify H′(x) if H(x)=√(x−x²)​+arcsin(√x​).

2. Use linear approximation to estimate f(3.1), given that f(3)=−4 and f′(x)=√(x²+16​)

(a) Next three terms of the series 2, 6, 18, 54, 162 are 486, 1458, 4374.

And the series is Geometric.

(b) Next three terms of the series 1, 11, 21, 31, 41 are 51, 61, 71.

The given series (a) is: 2, 6, 18, 54, 162

So now,

6/2 = 3; 18/6 = 3; 54/18 = 3; 162/54 = 3

So the quotient of the division of any term by preceding term is constant. Hence the given series (a) 2, 6, 18, 54, 162 is Geometric.

Hence the correct option is (B).

The next three terms are = (162 * 3), (162 * 3 * 3), (162 * 3 * 3 * 3) = 486, 1458, 4374.

The given series (b) is: 1, 11, 21, 31, 41

11 - 1 = 10

21 - 11 = 10

31 - 21 = 10

41 - 31 = 10

Hence the series is Arithmetic.

So the next three terms are = 41 + 10, 41 + 10 + 10, 41 + 10 + 10 + 10 = 51, 61, 71.

To know more about series here

https://brainly.com/question/30264021

#SPJ4

The correct sequence of events that follows a reduction in the inflation rate is: r↓ ⇒ I↑ ⇒ AE↑ ⇒ Y↑. Option A is the correct option.

The term ‘r’ stands for interest rate, ‘I’ represents investment, ‘AE’ denotes aggregate expenditure, and ‘Y’ represents national income. When the interest rate is reduced, the investment increases. This is because when the interest rates are low, the cost of borrowing money also decreases. Therefore, businesses and individuals are more likely to invest in the economy when the cost of borrowing money is low. This leads to an increase in investment. This, in turn, leads to an increase in the aggregate expenditure of the economy. Aggregate expenditure is the sum total of consumption expenditure, investment expenditure, government expenditure, and net exports. As investment expenditure increases, aggregate expenditure also increases. Finally, the increase in aggregate expenditure leads to an increase in the national income of the economy. Therefore, the correct sequence of events that follows a reduction in the inflation rate is:r↓ ⇒ I↑ ⇒ AE↑ ⇒ Y↑.

To know more about inflation rate, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/19263433

#SPJ11

Given that dy/dx = 5 and y = [tex]x^{2}[/tex]+ 7, we can use the chain rule to find dy/dt by multiplying dy/dx by dx/dt, which is 1/5, resulting in dy/dt = (5 * 1/5) = 1. Hence, dy/dt when x = 4 is 1.

To find dy/dt​ when x = 4, we need to differentiate y =[tex]x^{2}[/tex] + 7 with respect to t using the chain rule.

Given dtdx​ = 5, we can rewrite it as dx/dt = 1/5, which represents the rate of change of x with respect to t.

Now, let's differentiate y = [tex]x^{2}[/tex] + 7 with respect to t:

dy/dt = d/dt ([tex]x^{2}[/tex] + 7)

= d/dx ([tex]x^{2}[/tex] + 7) * dx/dt [Applying the chain rule]

= (2x * dx/dt)

= (2x * 1/5) [Substituting dx/dt = 1/5]

Since we are given x = 4, we can substitute it into the expression:

dy/dt = (2 * 4 * 1/5)

= 8/5

Therefore, dy/dt when x = 4 is 8/5.

Learn more about chain rule here:

https://brainly.com/question/30764359

#SPJ11

The absolute value of 0.001 is 0.001. This means that regardless of the context in which 0.001 is used, its absolute value will always be 0.001, as it is already a positive number.

The absolute value of a number is the non-negative magnitude of that number, irrespective of its sign. In the case of 0.001, since it is a positive number, its absolute value will remain the same.

To understand why the absolute value of 0.001 is 0.001, let's delve into the concept further.

The absolute value function essentially removes the negative sign from negative numbers and leaves positive numbers unchanged. In other words, it measures the distance of a number from zero on the number line, regardless of its direction.

In the case of 0.001, it is a positive number that lies to the right of zero on the number line. It signifies a distance of 0.001 units from zero. As the absolute value function only considers the magnitude, without regard to the sign, the absolute value of 0.001 is 0.001 itself.

Therefore, the absolute value of 0.001 is 0.001. This means that regardless of the context in which 0.001 is used, its absolute value will always be 0.001, as it is already a positive number.

for such more question on absolute value

https://brainly.com/question/33515859

#SPJ8

The statement is false. The correct formula for the monthly payment on a $13,000 5-year car loan with a yearly interest rate of 9.5% compounded monthly is PMT(0.00791667, 60, 13000).

To calculate the monthly payment on a loan, we typically use the PMT function, which takes the arguments of the interest rate, number of periods, and loan amount. In this case, the loan amount is $13,000, the interest rate is 9.5% per year, and the loan term is 5 years.

However, before using the PMT function, we need to convert the yearly interest rate to a monthly interest rate by dividing it by 12. The monthly interest rate for 9.5% per year is approximately 0.00791667.

Therefore, the correct formula for the monthly payment on a $13,000 5-year car loan with a yearly interest rate of 9.5% compounded monthly is PMT(0.00791667, 60, 13000).

Hence, the statement is false.

Learn more about payment here:

https://brainly.com/question/28918908

#SPJ11

The solution to the given differential equation, after substituting the value of C, is:

[tex]\(y(t) = 233333.33 - 233333.33e^{-0.03t}\)[/tex]

The given differential equation is:

[tex]\(\frac{{dy}}{{dt}} = 0.03y + 7000\)[/tex]

To solve this equation using an integrating factor, we first find the integrating factor by taking the exponential of the integral of the coefficient of y, which is a constant. In this case, the coefficient is 0.03, so the integrating factor is [tex]\(e^{\int 0.03 \, dt} = e^{0.03t}\)[/tex].

Multiplying both sides of the differential equation by the integrating factor, we get:

[tex]\(e^{0.03t} \frac{{dy}}{{dt}} = 0.03e^{0.03t} y + 7000e^{0.03t}\)[/tex]

Now, we integrate both sides with respect to t:

[tex]\(\int e^{0.03t} \frac{{dy}}{{dt}} \, dt = \int (0.03e^{0.03t} y + 7000e^{0.03t}) \, dt\)[/tex]

Integrating, we have:

[tex]\(e^{0.03t} y = \int (0.03e^{0.03t} y) \, dt + \int (7000e^{0.03t}) \, dt\)[/tex]

Integrating the right side with respect to t, we get:

[tex]\(e^{0.03t} y = 0.03y \int e^{0.03t} \, dt + 7000 \int e^{0.03t} \, dt\)[/tex]

Simplifying and integrating, we have:

[tex]\(e^{0.03t} y = 0.03y \left(\frac{{e^{0.03t}}}{{0.03}}\right) + 7000\left(\frac{{e^{0.03t}}}{{0.03}}\right) + C\)[/tex]

[tex]\(e^{0.03t} y = y e^{0.03t} + 233333.33 e^{0.03t} + C\)[/tex]

Now, dividing both sides by [tex]\(e^{0.03t}\)[/tex], we get:

[tex]\(y = y + 233333.33 + Ce^{-0.03t}\)[/tex]

Simplifying, we have:

[tex]\(0 = 233333.33 + Ce^{-0.03t}\)[/tex]

Since the initial condition is y(0) = 30000, we can substitute t = 0 and y = 30000 into the equation:

[tex]\(0 = 233333.33 + Ce^{-0.03(0)}\)\(0 = 233333.33 + Ce^{0}\)\(0 = 233333.33 + C\)[/tex]

Solving for C, we have:

[tex]\(C = -233333.33\)[/tex]

Substituting this value back into the equation, we have:

[tex]\(y = 233333.33 - 233333.33e^{-0.03t}\)[/tex]

To know more about differential equation, refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/32645495

#SPJ4

The value of h'(0) for the function h(x)=f(x)/g(x) is, h'(0) = 11/25.

To find h'(0) for the function h(x) = f(x)/g(x), where f(0) = 7, g(0) = 5, f'(0) = 12, and g'(0) = -7, we need to use the quotient rule of differentiation.

The result is h'(0) = (f'(0)g(0) - f(0)g'(0))/(g(0))^2.The quotient rule states that if we have two functions u(x) and v(x), then the derivative of their quotient is given by (u'(x)v(x) - u(x)v'(x))/(v(x))^2.

In this case, we have h(x) = f(x)/g(x), where f(x) and g(x) are functions with the given initial values. Using the quotient rule, we differentiate h(x) with respect to x to obtain h'(x) = (f'(x)g(x) - f(x)g'(x))/(g(x))^2.

At x = 0, we can evaluate the derivative as follows:

h'(0) = (f'(0)g(0) - f(0)g'(0))/(g(0))^2

      = (12 * 5 - 7 * 7)/(5^2)

      = (60 - 49)/25

      = 11/25.

Therefore, h'(0) = 11/25.

Learn more about Derivatives here:

brainly.com/question/25324584

#SPJ11

The probability that a randomly selected adult female's pulse rate is between 69 beats per minute and 81 beats per minute is approximately 0.3688 (rounded to four decimal places).

To find the probability that a randomly selected adult female's pulse rate is between 69 beats per minute and 81 beats per minute, we need to standardize the values and use the standard normal distribution.

The standardization formula is:

Z = (X - μ) / σ

where X is the observed value, μ is the mean, and σ is the standard deviation.

In this case, we have X₁ = 69 beats per minute and X₂ = 81 beats per minute, μ = 75.0 beats per minute, and σ = 12.5 beats per minute.

Using the standardization formula, we can calculate the z-scores for each value:

Z₁ = (69 - 75.0) / 12.5

Z₂ = (81 - 75.0) / 12.5

Simplifying these calculations, we get:

Z₁ ≈ -0.48

Z₂ ≈ 0.48

Now, we can use a standard normal distribution table or a calculator to find the probability associated with these z-scores.

The probability that the pulse rate is between 69 beats per minute and 81 beats per minute can be found by calculating the area under the standard normal curve between the z-scores -0.48 and 0.48.

P(-0.48 < Z < 0.48) ≈ P(Z < 0.48) - P(Z < -0.48)

Using a standard normal distribution table or a calculator, we find:

P(Z < 0.48) ≈ 0.6844

P(Z < -0.48) ≈ 0.3156

Substituting these values into the equation, we get:

P(-0.48 < Z < 0.48) ≈ 0.6844 - 0.3156

P(-0.48 < Z < 0.48) ≈ 0.3688

Learn more about probability at: brainly.com/question/31828911

#SPJ11

The approximation of a root of f(x) = 0 near x₀ = -1.5 is given by option A, -1.269304.

An approximation of the root of f(x) = 0 near x₀ = -1.5, we can use numerical methods such as Newton's method or the bisection method. Since the question does not specify the method used, we can evaluate the given options to find the closest approximation.

By substituting x = -1.269304 into f(x), we can check if it is close to zero. If f(-1.269304) is close to zero, it indicates that -1.269304 is an approximation of the root.

Calculating f(-1.269304) using the given function, we find that f(-1.269304) ≈ -0.000009, which is very close to zero. Therefore, option A, -1.269304, is the most accurate approximation of the root near x₀ = -1.5.

Learn more about function : brainly.com/question/28278690

#SPJ11

The function f(x) = cos(4πx) evaluated at the endpoints of the interval [2, 1] is f(2) = cos(8π) and f(1) = cos(4π). Rolle's Theorem does not apply to f on this interval (DNE).

Evaluating the function f(x) = cos(4πx) at the endpoints of the interval [2, 1], we have f(2) = cos(4π*2) = cos(8π) and f(1) = cos(4π*1) = cos(4π).

To determine if Rolle's Theorem applies to f on this interval, we need to check if the function satisfies the conditions of Rolle's Theorem, which are:

1. f(x) is continuous on the closed interval [2, 1].

2. f(x) is differentiable on the open interval (2, 1).

3. f(2) = f(1).

In this case, the function f(x) = cos(4πx) is continuous and differentiable on the interval (2, 1). However, f(2) = cos(8π) does not equal f(1) = cos(4π).

Since the third condition of Rolle's Theorem is not satisfied, Rolle's Theorem does not apply to f on the interval [2, 1]. Therefore, we cannot find a value c in (2, 1) such that f'(c) = 0. The answer is "DNE" (Does Not Exist).

LEARN MORE ABOUT Rolle's Theorem here: brainly.com/question/2292493

#SPJ11

The statement "Rounding non-integer solution values up to the nearest integer value will still result in a feasible solution" is false.

In mathematical optimization, feasible solutions are those that meet all constraints and are, therefore, possible solutions. These values are not necessarily integer values, and rounding non-integer solution values up to the nearest integer value will not always result in a feasible solution.

In general, rounding non-integer solution values up to the nearest integer value may result in a solution that does not satisfy one or more constraints, making it infeasible. Thus, the statement is false.

Learn more about rounding:

brainly.com/question/1620496

#SPJ11

The equation of the trend line that models the relationship between time and Kim's annual salary is Y = 2200x + 40000.

To determine the equation of the trend line, we need to consider the relationship between time and Kim's annual salary. The table provided shows the annual salary for each corresponding year. By examining the data, we can observe that the salary increases by $2200 each year. Therefore, the slope of the trend line is 2200. The initial value or y-intercept is $40,000, which represents the salary in the base year (1996). Therefore, the equation of the trend line is Y = 2200x + 40000, where x represents the years since 1996 and y represents the annual salary.

Learn more about annual salary here:

https://brainly.com/question/13186155

#SPJ11