The implementation of the TCJA Act of 2017, which limits the deductions for state and local taxes to $10,000 per year, does not necessarily indicate that the IRS is taking drastic steps towards curbing home ownership. However, it does place a disproportionate burden on taxpayers residing in states with higher market values on residential property.
The TCJA Act of 2017 introduced several changes to the tax code, including the limitation on the deduction for state and local taxes (SALT) to $10,000 per year. This means that taxpayers can only deduct up to $10,000 of their state and local taxes, including property taxes and sales taxes, from their federal taxable income.
While this limitation does not directly target home ownership, it does have implications for homeowners, particularly those residing in states with higher property values. These states often have higher property taxes, and taxpayers in these states may face a larger tax burden as they can only deduct up to $10,000 of their property taxes, even if they pay more.
The limitation on SALT deductions has been a subject of debate, with critics arguing that it disproportionately affects taxpayers in states with higher market values on residential property. These taxpayers may face higher tax liabilities due to the reduced deductions, making it more challenging to afford homeownership in these areas.
The implementation of the TCJA Act of 2017 and the limitation on SALT deductions do not imply that the IRS is actively trying to curb home ownership. However, the restriction does place a disproportionate burden on taxpayers residing in states with higher market values on residential property. The impact of this limitation varies depending on individual circumstances and the specific tax landscape of each state.
To know more about TCJA Act ,visit;
https://brainly.com/question/20397638
#SPJ11
Which is permitted under the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act of 1977? 1) hiring independent contractors from only foreign countries 2) making grease payments to process an order 3) paying a bribe if is it legal in the country where the business is being conducted 4) paying a bribe if another company has offered to pay a bribe first
Under the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act of 1977 (FCPA), making grease payments to process an order is permitted.
The FCPA prohibits bribery and corrupt practices in international business transactions. However, there is an exception for facilitating or expediting payments, commonly referred to as "grease payments," which are made to low-level government officials to expedite routine administrative tasks, such as obtaining permits or processing paperwork. These payments are allowed under the FCPA as long as they are lawful under the laws of the foreign country where the business is being conducted. Therefore, out of the options provided, only option 2) making grease payments to process an order is permitted under the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act of 1977.
Hiring independent contractors from only foreign countries, paying a bribe if it is legal in the country, and paying a bribe if another company has offered to pay a bribe first are all prohibited under the FCPA.
To know more about grease payments, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/32588938
#SPJ11
McCulloch v. Maryland (1819) is an important Supreme Court ruling because
OA. it strengthened state government power by declaring that Maryland could tax a federal bank under the doctrine of dual sovereignty.
O B. it expanded the power of the national government by declaring that federal taxes on state banks were constitutional.
O C. it limited state government power by declaring that international laws and treaties ratified by Congress applied to the state jurisdiction.
D. it limited state government power by declaring that Maryland could not tax a federal bank.
O E/ it expanded state government power by declaring that state laws could override the commerce clause.
It limited state government power by declaring that Maryland could not tax a federal bank," is the most accurate statement regarding the significance of McCulloch v. Maryland (1819). Out of the options provided, option D,
In this landmark Supreme Court case, the Court ruled that the state of Maryland could not impose a tax on the Second Bank of the United States, a federal institution.
The Court's decision asserted the supremacy of the federal government over state governments in matters concerning federal institutions and established the principle of implied powers, allowing Congress to take actions not explicitly mentioned in the Constitution as long as they were necessary and proper to carry out its enumerated powers. option D,
Learn more about Supreme Court case,
https://brainly.com/question/13557795
#SPJ11
Explain the Supreme Court Case McClesky versus Kemp and how does it relate to sentencing and prosecution according to Mauer?
The approach to race has changed but has the law caught up? Are the policies in place just to everyone?
The Supreme Court Case McClesky v. Kemp was a landmark case in 1987 that involved a challenge to Georgia's death penalty sentencing system. In this case, Warren McClesky, an African American man, argued that the death penalty was applied in a racially discriminatory manner, violating his rights under the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments.
McClesky's legal team presented statistical evidence showing that defendants who killed white victims were more likely to receive the death penalty than those who killed Black victims. However, the Supreme Court ruled against McClesky, stating that statistical evidence alone was insufficient to prove racial discrimination and that the death penalty was constitutional.
According to Marc Mauer, an expert on race and criminal justice, the McClesky decision has had a significant impact on sentencing and prosecution policies. It established a high standard of proof for demonstrating racial bias in criminal justice practices, making it difficult to challenge such discrimination in the courts.
The approach to race in the criminal justice system has indeed evolved since McClesky, but the law has not completely caught up. While policies have been implemented to address racial disparities, such as sentencing reform and the use of implicit bias training, they are not comprehensive enough to ensure justice for everyone.
In conclusion, McClesky v. Kemp was a pivotal Supreme Court case that highlighted the challenges in proving racial bias in the criminal justice system. While progress has been made, there is still work to be done to ensure fair and unbiased sentencing and prosecution policies for all.
To know more about Law, click here:
brainly.com/question/6590381
#SPJ11
problems become recognized in the social domain not because they exist, but because they are identified and defined as problems.
Problems in the social domain become recognized not simply because they objectively exist, but rather because they are identified and defined as problems by individuals, groups, or societies.
The process of problem identification and definition is influenced by various factors, including social norms, values, cultural beliefs, and the perceptions and experiences of different stakeholders.
The recognition of a problem often involves a collective process of understanding and agreement within a given social context. It may involve discussions, debates, research, and the sharing of information and experiences. Different stakeholders may have different perspectives on what constitutes a problem based on their unique positions, interests, and experiences.
Therefore, the recognition of problems in the social domain is a socially constructed process that relies on the collective understanding and agreement of a given society or community. It is important to acknowledge that different perspectives and voices play a role in shaping the identification and definition of problems, as this can impact subsequent efforts to address and solve them.
To read more about Stakeholders click here
https://brainly.com/question/30241824
#SPJ11
select the letter of the word or phrase below that best completes the sentence. 1) The authoritative statements of the common law, although not the law itself, are the 2) is the geographic area in which a lawsuit should be brought. 3) Sarbanes Oxley has sought to impose additional requirements on publicly held corporations in the area of 4) The right to the assistance of counsel and to a speedy and public trial are guaranteed by the 5) The protects all individuals against unreasonable searches and seizures. 6) An oral defamatory communication is slander while one that is written is 7) The elements of negligence include the breach of a duty and 8) One of the defenses available to a defendant in a negligence action is 9) The duty of care in a negligence action relied upon by the court is based on the 10) is based on neither negligence nor fault, but rather on the nature of the activity in which one is engaging. a) corporate governance b) venue c) liable d) proximate cause e) jurisdiction f) strict liability 8) Sixth Amendment h) reasonable person standard i) Fourth Amendment j) assumption of the risk k) res ipsa loquitor I) Restatements m) libel
By providing the corresponding letters and explanations, we have identified the appropriate word or phrase that completes each sentence. These terms are commonly used in legal contexts and understanding their meanings is essential in comprehending legal principles and concepts.
1) I) Restatements
2) b) venue
3) a) corporate governance
4) 8) Sixth Amendment
5) i) Fourth Amendment
6) m) libel
7) h) reasonable person standard
8) j) assumption of the risk
9) h) reasonable person standard
10) f) strict liability
1) The authoritative statements of the common law, although not the law itself, are the I) Restatements. Restatements are compilations of legal principles and rules that summarize and clarify the common law in specific areas of law.
2) The geographic area in which a lawsuit should be brought is referred to as b) venue. It determines the appropriate court or jurisdiction where a legal dispute should be heard.
3) Sarbanes Oxley has sought to impose additional requirements on publicly held corporations in the area of a) corporate governance. Corporate governance refers to the systems and practices that companies adopt to ensure accountability, transparency, and ethical conduct.
4) The right to the assistance of counsel and to a speedy and public trial are guaranteed by the 8) Sixth Amendment. The Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution ensures various rights in criminal prosecutions, including the right to counsel and a speedy and public trial.
5) The Fourth Amendment i) protects all individuals against unreasonable searches and seizures. It safeguards the right to privacy by prohibiting unreasonable searches and seizures by government authorities.
6) An oral defamatory communication is slander while one that is written is m) libel. Slander refers to spoken defamatory statements, while libel refers to written or printed defamatory statements that harm a person's reputation.
7) The elements of negligence include the breach of a duty and h) reasonable person standard. In a negligence claim, the plaintiff must demonstrate that the defendant breached a duty of care owed to them and that this breach caused the plaintiff's harm. The reasonable person standard is used to assess whether the defendant's conduct met the expected standard of care.
8) One of the defenses available to a defendant in a negligence action is j) assumption of the risk. Assumption of the risk defense asserts that the plaintiff voluntarily assumed the known risks associated with a particular activity and therefore cannot hold the defendant liable for any resulting harm.
9) The duty of care in a negligence action relied upon by the court is based on the h) reasonable person standard. The court assesses whether the defendant's conduct met the expected standard of care that a reasonable person would exercise in similar circumstances.
10) Strict liability f) is based on neither negligence nor fault, but rather on the nature of the activity in which one is engaging. Strict liability holds a party responsible for harm caused by their actions or products, regardless of fault or negligence, based on the inherently dangerous nature of the activity or product involved.
To know more about comprehending ,visit;
https://brainly.com/question/24716030
#SPJ11
An intentional tort arises from an act and some can be considered crimes under federal, state or local law. Some examples of intentional tort are battery and assault: Battery is a harmful or offensive contact with another person with intent to cause the contact or apprehension of contact and without the consent from the individual. Examples are that you intend to punch someone and do. An assault is an attempted battery that missed. You intend to punch someone in the face but missed. Acts that would meet the standard for an intentional tort are acts that are beyond and exceed what would be considered ordinary negligence. As a result of the Lion Air and Ethiopian Air crashes, what arguments could be made by the families of the passengers on the Lion Air and Ethiopian Airlines flights that Boeing committed an intentional tort arising from the problems of the 737 Max?
The families of the passengers on the Lion Air and Ethiopian Airlines flights could potentially argue that Boeing committed an intentional tort arising from the problems of the 737 Max. Here are some arguments they could make:
1. Negligent Misrepresentation: The families could argue that Boeing made false or misleading statements about the safety features and capabilities of the 737 Max, leading passengers to believe that it was a safe aircraft to fly. They could claim that Boeing intentionally misrepresented the aircraft's safety to the public, leading to the loss of lives in the crashes.
2. Product Liability: The families could argue that Boeing was aware of the design flaws and software issues with the 737 Max but intentionally failed to address them adequately. They could claim that Boeing's intentional disregard for passenger safety and failure to take appropriate actions to rectify known issues amounted to an intentional tort.
3. Strict Liability: The families could argue that Boeing should be held strictly liable for the crashes because the design and manufacturing defects of the 737 Max made it unreasonably dangerous for passengers. They could claim that Boeing's intentional failure to ensure the aircraft's safety led to the crashes and subsequent injuries and deaths.
4. Failure to Warn: The families could argue that Boeing intentionally failed to warn airlines and pilots about the risks and potential hazards associated with the MCAS (Maneuvering Characteristics Augmentation System) in the 737 Max. They could claim that Boeing intentionally withheld crucial information about the system, leading to the crashes and the resulting harm.
It is important to note that these arguments would need to be supported by evidence and legal analysis, and the families would need to prove that Boeing intentionally committed an act or omission that directly caused the crashes and resulting damages. Additionally, it is advisable to consult with legal professionals to better understand the specific legal aspects and potential arguments in such cases.
To know more about flights, visit:
brainly.com/question/27805106
#SPJ11
Difference between human law and natural law
Answer:
natural law and human law
Explanation:
natural law hold that there are universal law standard that are inherit in human mankind throughout all time and these standard should form basis of a society
Human law: in working out human laws human practical reason move from the general principle to the contingent commands of human law
Answer:
The natural law is law with moral content, more general than human law. Natural law deals with necessary rather than with variable things. In working out human laws, human practical reason moves from the general principles implanted in natural law to the contingent commands of human law.
Explanation:
all else equal, when products made in brazil become more fashionable relative to products made in japan, we expect to see
When products made in Brazil become more fashionable relative to products made in Japan, we expect to see a shift in consumer preferences and purchasing behavior. The specific impacts can vary, but here are a few general expectations:
1. Increased demand for Brazilian products: As Brazilian products gain popularity and become more fashionable, consumers are likely to show a greater preference for them. This can lead to an increase in the demand for Brazilian goods in the market.
2. Shift in market shares: If the trend continues, the market shares of Brazilian products may increase while the market shares of Japanese products may decrease. This shift can be observed in various industries where both countries compete, such as fashion, electronics, or automotive.
3. Changes in trade patterns: The increased popularity of Brazilian products may lead to changes in international trade patterns. Brazil's exports to other countries, including Japan, may grow as the demand for their products increases. Conversely, Japan's exports to Brazil may decline if their products are becoming less fashionable.
4. Impact on industries and employment: A shift in consumer preferences towards Brazilian products can have implications for industries and employment in both countries. Brazilian industries that produce fashionable goods may experience growth and potentially create more job opportunities, while Japanese industries may face challenges if their products become less in demand.
It's important to note that these expectations are based on the assumption that all else remains equal, and various factors such as pricing, quality, marketing, and cultural influences can also affect consumer choices and market dynamics.
To read more about Purchasing Behavior click here
https://brainly.com/question/32289379
#SPJ11
To win a claim of trademark infringement against a defendant, the trademark holder must establish:
That the defendant intended to cause economic harm to the trademark holder.
That its trademark is descriptive.
That the defendant’s use of the trademark creates a likelihood of confusion for customers as to which company is responsible for the product or service.
All of the above.
To win a claim of trademark infringement against a defendant, the trademark holder must establish that the defendant intended to cause economic harm to the trademark holder, that its trademark is descriptive, and that the defendant's use of the trademark creates a likelihood of confusion for customers as to which company is responsible for the product or service.
These three elements must be proven to successfully argue trademark infringement. Firstly, the trademark holder must demonstrate that the defendant intentionally aimed to harm their economic interests through the unauthorized use of the trademark. Secondly, it is essential to establish that the trademark itself is descriptive, meaning it accurately describes the product or service it represents.
Lastly, the trademark holder needs to demonstrate that the defendant's use of the trademark creates confusion among consumers, leading them to believe that the defendant's product or service is associated with the trademark holder. By establishing all three elements, the trademark holder can strengthen their case and increase the chances of winning a claim of trademark infringement.
To know more about trademark.
brainly.com/question/14578580
#SPJ11
Explain hedges for politically-imposed risk as contrasted to
those for risk arising from foreign-exchange fluctuations.
Hedges for politically-imposed risk and those for risk arising from foreign-exchange fluctuations are two distinct strategies used by businesses to mitigate different types of risks.
Hedges for politically-imposed risk are designed to protect against adverse events resulting from political actions or decisions that may impact a company's operations or investments. These risks can include changes in government regulations, policies, taxation, or geopolitical events. To hedge against politically-imposed risk, businesses may employ strategies such as diversifying their operations across multiple countries, establishing joint ventures or partnerships with local entities, or purchasing political risk insurance. These measures aim to reduce the potential negative impact of political changes on the company's financial performance and stability.
On the other hand, hedges for risk arising from foreign-exchange fluctuations are focused on managing the volatility in currency exchange rates. Businesses that engage in international trade or have operations in different countries are exposed to the risk of currency fluctuations, which can impact their revenues, costs, and profitability. To hedge against this risk, companies may use financial instruments such as forward contracts, options, or currency swaps to lock in exchange rates for future transactions or to offset potential losses resulting from adverse currency movements. These hedging strategies help businesses minimize the uncertainties and potential financial losses associated with foreign-exchange fluctuations.
In conclusion, hedges for politically-imposed risk and hedges for risk arising from foreign-exchange fluctuations are distinct strategies used by businesses to manage different types of risks. While politically-imposed risk hedges focus on mitigating the impact of political actions and decisions, hedging against foreign-exchange fluctuations aims to manage the volatility in currency exchange rates. Employing appropriate hedging strategies for each type of risk can help businesses safeguard their financial performance and enhance their ability to navigate uncertain and challenging environments.
To know more about Hedges , visit
https://brainly.com/question/29350137
#SPJ11
The Outline of your Legal Brief needs to include the following: Title Page (that includes the case name in italics, the course number, your name, the date you submit this) Then the actual outline should list these sections. I. ISSUE (I do want your outline to include the issue statement (question) you are asking the court to answer.) II. INTRODUCTION (bullet points of what you plan to include) III. STATEMENT OF FACTS (bullet points of pertinent facts you plan to include) IV. ARGUMENT (bullet points that include the issue statement once again, the rule of law that applies, and how that rule of law should apply here) V. CONCLUSION (one bullet point of what you are asking the court to do here)
The outline of the legal brief should include the following sections: I. ISSUE, II. INTRODUCTION, III. STATEMENT OF FACTS, IV. ARGUMENT, and V. CONCLUSION.
The outline begins with a title page that includes the case name, course number, your name, and the submission date. It then proceeds with the sections mentioned above. The ISSUE section presents the question the court needs to answer. The INTRODUCTION section provides bullet points outlining the content to be included. The STATEMENT OF FACTS section lists pertinent facts related to the case. The ARGUMENT section includes bullet points stating the issue statement, the applicable rule of law, and how that rule should be applied in the case. Finally, the CONCLUSION section consists of one bullet point that states the desired outcome or action requested from the court.
To summarize, the outline for the legal brief should contain sections for ISSUE, INTRODUCTION, STATEMENT OF FACTS, ARGUMENT, and CONCLUSION. Each section serves a specific purpose in presenting the case and supporting the desired outcome.
To know more about legal brief click here:
https://brainly.com/question/28592079
#SPJ11
Which of the following is an example of a third party law? A law that requires annual car inspections. people who ride motorcycles to wear a helmet. people who drive a car to wear a seat belt. All of the above. Question 44 Which of the following is a true statement? Austrian economists believe that by raising taxes on the top income earners, we can afford our social programs, fund the military, and pay off the national debt. Keynesian economists believe that we should stimulate growth by lowering taxes and regulations, especially on business groups. Most voters may support the tax the rich strategy because one-half of income earners receive back from the government more than they pay in taxes and/or they do not consider themselves rich. The bottom half of taxpayers paid more than 60% of federal taxes in a recent year.
The correct answer to the first question is "All of the above." Each of the examples mentioned (annual car inspections, wearing a helmet while riding a motorcycle, and wearing a seat belt while driving a car) represents a third party law.
These laws impose requirements or restrictions on individuals for the purpose of protecting the safety and well-being of others.
Regarding the second statement, the true statement is "Most voters may support the tax the rich strategy because one-half of income earners receive back from the government more than they pay in taxes and/or they do not consider themselves rich." This statement highlights a potential reason why many voters might support taxing the rich. It suggests that some individuals may not perceive themselves as being affected by higher taxes on top income earners and may benefit from government programs that are funded through such taxation.
It's important to note that the other statements provided in the question represent different economic perspectives and opinions, rather than universally accepted truths. Austrian economists and Keynesian economists have different views on tax policies and economic strategies. The statement about the bottom half of taxpayers paying more than 60% of federal taxes in a recent year may be a factual claim, but without specific data or context, it is challenging to determine its accuracy.
To know more about third party law
https://brainly.com/question/9996328
#SPJ11
According to North Carolina law, the assessed value of real property for ad valorum tax purposes is based upon the
A. property's market value
B. original cost of the land and improvements
C budgetary needs of the county or city
D. property's cost plus appr
According to North Carolina law, the assessed value of real property for ad valorum tax purposes is based upon the A. property's market value.
According to North Carolina law, the assessed value of real property for ad valorem tax purposes is generally based on the property's market value. Market value refers to the estimated price that a willing buyer would pay and a willing seller would accept for the property in an open and competitive market. It takes into consideration various factors such as comparable sales, property characteristics, location, and market conditions.
The market value approach is commonly used in property assessments to ensure fairness and equity in determining the tax burden. By assessing properties based on their market value, the tax authorities aim to distribute the tax liability proportionally among property owners according to the value of their properties.
Option B, which suggests the original cost of the land and improvements, is not the typical basis for property assessment in North Carolina. Similarly, option C, referring to the budgetary needs of the county or city, is not directly tied to the property's value and does not reflect the standard approach for determining assessed value. Option D, mentioning the property's cost plus appreciation, is also not the usual method used in property assessment.
To know more about North Carolina law
https://brainly.com/question/32328965
#SPJ11
Most standard risks derive from?
Answer:
Once a bill has been enacted into law, it is called an act of the legislature, or a statute. Bills are introduced in the legislature and are discussed, debated and voted upon.
Explanation:
1. Rescission of a contract is most appropriate for which of the following?
The court determined a quasi contract was created
The court determined consideration was vague or inadequate
The parties mutually performed their contract obligations to the point of substantial performance
The offeree discovers fraud in the offering made by the offeror
2. Which of the following best describes a breach of a valid contract?
The offeror fails to pay the offeree the agreed upon consideration for marrying his sister
The offeror sells the boat shortly after she offers Sheldon $1,000.00 if he delivers his boat to the New Bern Marina before 5pm Friday
A manufacturer fails to meet the specific delivery deadline contained in a written bi-lateral contract with a wholesale client
Sheldon anchors the offeror’s boat shortly after leaving the dock and refuses to take the boat any further
3. Which of the following is NOT a requirement of a valid contract?
Agreement
Consideration
A written agreement
Legality
4. Which of the following is a true statement?
Offeror and promisee are the same entity
Bi-lateral contracts must be in writing
Unilateral contracts are limited to output contracts
Bi-lateral contracts are established once there is an agreement with consideration
A contract is an agreement between two or more parties that creates legal obligations. Here are some answers to the questions
1. The court determined a quasi contract was created: Rescission of a contract may be appropriate if a quasi contract was created by the parties' conduct. A quasi contract is a legal concept that creates a contract-like relationship between parties who have not had a formal agreement.
2. The offeror fails to pay the offeree the agreed upon consideration for marrying his sister: A breach of contract occurs when one party fails to perform or fulfill its obligations under the contract.
3. Legality: Legality is not a requirement of a valid contract. A valid contract must have agreement, consideration, and a written agreement if the contract is bi-lateral.
4. Offeror and promisee are the same entity: This statement is false. The offeror is the party making the offer, and the promise is the party accepting the offer.
Overall, contracts are legally binding agreements that create obligations between parties. It is important to understand the requirements of a valid contract and the legal implications of breaching a contract
Learn more about contracts visit : brainly.com/question/27899951
#SPJ11
Constitutionalism means:
a. Federal government allows states to have some powers b. State surrenders most power to the federal government.
c. State government allows the federal government to have some powers The Federal government is limited to the few powers given to them in Article I section 8
Option a is incorrect,
Option b is also incorrect,
Option c is the correct answer.
Constitutionalism refers to a system of government where there is a constitution that establishes the powers, limits, and rights of the government. It ensures that the government operates within the framework of the constitution, respecting the rule of law and protecting individual rights. In this context, the options provided can be evaluated.
Option a is incorrect as it suggests that the federal government allows states to have some powers. Constitutionalism does not necessarily involve the federal government allowing powers to states.
Option b is also incorrect as it states that the state surrenders most power to the federal government. Constitutionalism is about establishing a balance of power, not necessarily one entity surrendering most power to another.
Option c is the correct answer as it states that state governments allow the federal government to have some powers. This aligns with the principle of constitutionalism, where power is shared between the state and federal government, with each having their own set of powers and limitations.
The phrase "The Federal government is limited to the few powers given to them in Article I section 8" is accurate, as it highlights that the federal government's powers are specifically outlined in the constitution, specifically in Article I section 8.
Know more about Constitutionalism here:
https://brainly.com/question/4932085
#SPJ11
Due to the system of federalism, which of the following courts has the broadest subject matter jurisdiction? a Charleston County Trial Court (state of South Carolina) b The United States (federal) District Court for the District of South Carolina c The United States (federal) Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals
d The United States (federal) Supreme Court
The United States (federal) Supreme Court has the broadest subject matter jurisdiction due to the system of federalism.The answer is B.
In the United States, the federal system is based on the separation of power between the central government and the state governments. Under this system, courts have jurisdiction over cases involving federal law, state law, or both. The United States Supreme Court has the broadest subject matter jurisdiction due to its power of judicial review.
It is the only court in the United States with the power to interpret the Constitution and to review federal and state laws to determine if they are constitutional. The Supreme Court has appellate jurisdiction, which means that it hears appeals from lower courts and can overrule their decisions.The answer is B.
To know more about jurisdiction, refer to the link:
https://brainly.com/question/14179714#
#SPJ11
How does a quasi contract differ from an express or an implied contract? What areplain meaning laws / rules?
A quasi contract is a legal concept that arises when there is no actual contract between the parties, but one party has received a benefit from the other party, which would be unjust for them to keep without compensating the other party. In a quasi contract, there is no mutual agreement or intention to create a legal relationship.
On the other hand, an express contract is created when the parties explicitly state the terms and conditions of their agreement, either orally or in writing. An implied contract, however, is created when the parties' actions suggest an intention to be bound by a contract, even if the terms are not explicitly stated.
Plain meaning laws or rules are principles used in legal interpretation. They suggest that the words of a contract should be given their ordinary and plain meaning, as understood by the average person. This means that the court should not look beyond the actual words used in the contract to interpret its meaning. These laws/rules help ensure clarity and predictability in contractual agreements.
In summary, a quasi contract is different from an express or implied contract as it does not require mutual agreement, while express and implied contracts involve a clear intention to create a legal relationship. Plain meaning laws/rules guide the interpretation of contract terms based on their ordinary and plain meaning.
Know more about quasi contract here:
https://brainly.com/question/30811453
#SPJ11
The use of the public wearing of letters was used to publicly shame criminals, including those who
were guilty of "moral crimes." In this system, A stands for
Atheist
Adulterer
Arrogant
Agent
Dr. Graham Wood purchased a cashier’s check in the amount of $6,000 from Central Bank of the South (Bank). The check was made payable to Ken Walker and was delivered to him. Eleven months later, Bank’s branch manager informed Wood that the cashier’s check was still outstanding. Wood subsequently signed a form, requesting that payment be stopped and a replacement check issued. He also agreed to indemnify Bank for any damages resulting from the issuance of the replacement check. Bank issued a replacement check to Wood. Seven months later, Walker deposited the original cashier’s check in his bank, which was paid by Bank. Bank requested that Woods repay the bank $6,000. When he refused, Bank sued Woods to recover this amount. Who wins? Wood v. Central Bank of the South, 435 So.2d 1287, Web 1982 Ala. Civ. App. Lexis 1362 (Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama)
In the case of Wood v. Central Bank of the South, the court's decision is not provided in the information provided.
To determine who wins the case, it would be necessary to review the court's ruling in the specific case. The citation given, 435 So.2d 1287, Web 1982 Ala. Civ. App. Lexis 1362, suggests that it is a court decision from the Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama in 1982. To determine the outcome of the case and who wins, it would be necessary to access the full text of the court's decision or consult legal resources that provide a summary or analysis of the case.Links to statutes, court decisions, treaties, legal dictionaries, journals, and copyright information, among other laws and legal resources.
To know more about legal resources
https://brainly.com/question/30736340
#SPJ11
Amanda is about to become a manager at her firm. She wants to be a morally upstanding manager and wants to encourage her subordinates to be moral as well. What moral imperative(s) should she encourage her employees to adhere to?
A.Refrain from lying and do unto other as you would like done to you.
B. Justice is the will of the stronger so be as strong as you can.
C. Be courageous and mighty forces will come to your aid.
D. Morality consists of rewarding your friends and punishing your enemies.
Amanda should encourage her employees to adhere to the moral imperative of refraining from lying and treating others as they would like to be treated (Option A).
Option A aligns with the principle of honesty, integrity, and the Golden Rule, which is a widely recognized ethical principle found in various religious and philosophical traditions. Encouraging employees to refrain from lying promotes trust, transparency, and ethical behavior within the organization. Treating others as they would like to be treated fosters empathy, respect, and fairness in interpersonal relationships.
Option B suggests that justice is determined by the will of the stronger, which promotes a might-makes-right mentality and disregards the principles of fairness and equality. This perspective may lead to unethical behaviors such as exploitation, oppression, and abuse of power.
Option C implies that being courageous will attract assistance from powerful forces. While courage is generally valued, relying solely on external forces may not promote individual responsibility and ethical decision-making.
Option D suggests a morality based on favoritism and retribution, which undermines fairness, equality, and impartiality. It can lead to bias, discrimination, and the mistreatment of individuals based on personal relationships rather than merit or ethical considerations.
By choosing Option A, Amanda promotes a moral imperative that emphasizes honesty, empathy, and fairness. These principles contribute to a positive and ethical work environment, fostering trust, cooperation, and integrity among employees. Encouraging employees to adhere to these principles can cultivate a culture of ethical behavior and contribute to the overall moral standing of the organization.
To know more about employees , visit
https://brainly.com/question/30644627
#SPJ11
Explain the Full Fundamental Law with formulae? Haren
The full fundamental law of arithmetic is a theorem in number theory. It states that every positive integer greater than 1 can be factored into a unique product of prime numbers. That is, any integer n can be written in the form:n = p1^a1 * p2^a2 * p3^a3 * ... * pk^ak where pi are prime numbers and ai are non-negative integers.
This factorization is unique up to the order of the factor. The proof of this theorem is beyond the scope of this answer, but it relies on the fact that any integer can be written as a product of primes. This fact can be proven using Euclid's lemma, which states that if a prime number divides the product of two integers, then it must divide at least one of the factors.
To know more about arithmetic, refer to the link:
https://brainly.com/question/16415816#
#SPJ11
Give an example of a unilateral contract. Identify the element that distinguishes it from a bilateral contract. Question 48 In Canada, what does it mean when we say that either the federal government or the provincial government has "jurisdiction" over a given matter? Question 49 ( 2 points) Daniel offers to sell his bicycle to Edmond for $1000. Edmond tells Daniel that he really wants the bicycle, but unfortunately, he can't afford it. Later that afternoon, Edmond buys a lottery ticket and wins $1000. He goes to Daniel's house and tells him he accepts his offer. Are Daniel and Edmond in a binding contract? (Why or why not?
An example of a unilateral contract is a reward offer. In this type of contract, one party makes a promise to provide something (such as money or a prize) in return for a specific act or performance from the other party.
The distinguishing element of a unilateral contract is that it is formed when the act or performance is completed, whereas a bilateral contract is formed when both parties exchange promises.
When we say that either the federal government or the provincial government has "jurisdiction" over a given matter in Canada, it means that the government entity has the legal authority to make decisions and enforce laws regarding that particular matter within its designated territory.
In the scenario with Daniel and Edmond, they would not be in a binding contract. This is because Edmond did not accept Daniel's offer before the lottery win. Acceptance must be communicated before any changes in circumstances occur. Since Edmond only accepted the offer after winning the lottery, there was no binding agreement in place at the time of acceptance.
Know more about reward offer here:
https://brainly.com/question/31473172
#SPJ11
A third responsibility is_________________.
The citation to a primary source of law is as follows: 23 USC 543. Based on its citation, this is a(n):
a. Administrative law written by Congress.
b. Statutory law written by Congress.
c. US Supreme Court case.
d. unable to tell from the information given.
Based on the citation 23 USC 543, the correct answer is b. Statutory law written by Congress. The citation format indicates that this is a section (§) of Title 23 (USC) of the United States Code.
The United States Code is a compilation of all the federal laws enacted by Congress. Statutory law refers to laws that are enacted by the legislative branch of government, which in the United States is Congress. Therefore, the citation provided suggests that 23 USC 543 is a specific provision within the statutory laws written by Congress. It is important to note that administrative law refers to regulations and rules created by administrative agencies, while US Supreme Court cases are decisions made by the highest court in the country.
Know more about Statutory law here:
https://brainly.com/question/33065456
#SPJ11
2. A North Carolina subcontractor won a state contract in Wyoming to demolish a bridge. Wyoming's law allowed its residents to be paid $50 a hour on that contract and outside residents to be paid $30 an hour. What is the issue before the court?
The issue before the court is whether Wyoming's law, which allows higher wages for residents of Wyoming compared to non-residents for a state contract, violates the Commerce Clause of the United States Constitution.
The Commerce Clause, found in Article I, Section 8 of the Constitution, grants Congress the power to regulate commerce among the states. It prevents states from enacting laws that discriminate against or burden interstate commerce. In this case, the subcontractor from North Carolina is challenging Wyoming's law that sets different wage rates based on residency for a state contract. By favoring residents over non-residents in terms of compensation, the law may create a barrier to interstate commerce and potentially violate the Commerce Clause.
The court will need to determine whether the wage discrepancy based on residency is a legitimate exercise of Wyoming's authority or if it unduly burdens interstate commerce. The subcontractor may argue that the law discriminates against out-of-state businesses and workers, while Wyoming may present justifications for the differential wage rates, such as promoting local employment and economic benefits.
The court will need to weigh the competing interests of protecting local workers and fostering economic growth in Wyoming against the potential restriction of interstate commerce. The decision will depend on whether the court finds the wage disparity based on residency to be a reasonable regulation or an impermissible burden on interstate commerce. This case highlights the tension between states' rights and the need for a unified national market, as well as the interpretation and application of the Commerce Clause in the context of labor laws and state contracts.
To know more about court , visit
https://brainly.com/question/30490295
#SPJ11
*BUSINESS LAW* On page 59 in your text, read the critical thinking case 3.3 Forum-Selection Clause. In your forum post, discuss whether the forum-selection clause in the contract is enforceable. In your opinion is the clause ethical? Why or why not? Why would Carnival Cruise want the lawsuit to be heard in Florida?
The enforceability of the forum-selection clause in the contract and its ethical implications are subjective matters open to interpretation and debate. Carnival Cruise may want the lawsuit to be heard in Florida due to several potential advantages such as familiarity with local laws and courts, potential biases in favor of the company, or logistical convenience for the parties involved.
The enforceability of the forum-selection clause depends on various factors such as the clarity of the clause, the bargaining power of the parties, and the reasonableness of the chosen forum. Ethically, the enforceability of such clauses can be debated as they may limit access to justice for the weaker party or enable forum shopping.
Determining the enforceability and ethical nature of a forum-selection clause requires a comprehensive analysis of the specific circumstances, legal principles, and societal norms. Each case should be evaluated on its own merits, considering the fairness and justice for all parties involved.
To know more about forum-selection clause click here:
https://brainly.com/question/33604730
#SPJ11
Contractual Performance and Breach
Congratulations! You have been hired by a law firm to provide legal advice. Your first client in your new job, Mr. James Bond, needs your legal advice on the following issue:
Mr. Bond is a landscaping contractor. He was hired by Mrs. Anderson to install a sprinkler system and new landscaping in her front yard, making a $1,000 down payment. The day before the installation was to take place, an unexpected storm came in, causing massive flooding in the area, leaving Mrs. Anderson’s yard covered in two feet of mud, tree branches, and trash. In order for Mr. Bond to perform his duties under the contract, he would first have to clean up the debris, then dig through an extra two feet of mud, which would require several days, and extra equipment and manpower. Mr. Bond opts for non-performing the contract. In your opinion, can Mr. Bond be sued by Mrs. Anderson for breaching the contract? Explain in detail.
In this case, the issue revolves around whether Mr. Bond can be sued by Mrs. Anderson for breaching the contract. To determine the answer, we need to analyze the concept of contractual performance and breach.
In general, a breach of contract occurs when one party fails to fulfill their obligations as stated in the agreement. However, there are certain circumstances where a party may be excused from performing their contractual duties. One such circumstance is when the performance becomes impracticable or impossible due to unforeseen events or circumstances beyond the control of the party.
In this situation, an unexpected storm caused massive flooding, resulting in Mrs. Anderson's yard being covered in debris and mud. As a landscaping contractor, Mr. Bond would need to clean up the debris and dig through the additional mud before installing the sprinkler system and landscaping. This would require significant extra time, equipment, and manpower.
Given the unforeseen and extreme circumstances caused by the storm, it can be argued that performance of the contract became impracticable for Mr. Bond. The additional work required to clean up the yard and dig through the mud was not anticipated at the time of entering into the contract. It would impose a significant burden on Mr. Bond, making it unreasonable to expect him to perform the contract as originally agreed upon.
Under the legal doctrine of impossibility or impracticability, a party may be excused from their contractual obligations if the performance becomes commercially impracticable due to unforeseen events. In this case, the storm and resulting flooding created such an unforeseen event that rendered performance impracticable for Mr. Bond.
Therefore, in my opinion, Mr. Bond cannot be sued by Mrs. Anderson for breaching the contract. The unforeseen and extreme circumstances made performance impracticable, relieving Mr. Bond of his contractual obligations. However, it is important to note that the specific laws and legal principles governing contracts may vary depending on the jurisdiction, and it is advisable for Mr. Bond to consult with an attorney familiar with the local laws to assess his specific situation.
To know more about contractual performance and breach, visit : brainly.com/question/31359788
#SPJ11
PLEASE Brief the following case using
IRAC:
Issue:
Rule:
Application:
Conclusion:
Allstate McDonough v. McDonough, 2016 N.H. Lexis 236
(N.H. 2016)
Issue: The issue in the case of Allstate McDonough v. McDonough is whether the insurance policy exclusion for intentional acts applies to bar coverage for the insured's actions resulting in harm to another person.
Rule: The applicable rule is that insurance policies generally exclude coverage for intentional acts. If an insured's actions are determined to be intentional, the insurance company may deny coverage for any resulting damages or injuries.
Application: In this case, Allstate McDonough seeks a declaratory judgment that they are not obligated to provide coverage for damages resulting from the insured, McDonough's intentional actions. The insured, McDonough, allegedly assaulted another individual, causing bodily harm. Allstate argues that the intentional acts exclusion in the insurance policy applies, and they should not be liable for any resulting damages.
The court must determine whether McDonough's actions were intentional and fall within the scope of the policy's intentional acts exclusion. They review the evidence, including witness testimonies, police reports, and any other relevant documentation, to assess the intent behind McDonough's actions.
Conclusion: Based on the facts and evidence presented, the court concludes that McDonough's actions were intentional, and they fall within the intentional acts exclusion of the insurance policy. Therefore, Allstate McDonough is not obligated to provide coverage for the damages resulting from McDonough's assault. The court rules in favor of Allstate McDonough, stating that the intentional acts exclusion applies, and they are not liable for the resulting damages in this case.
To know more about insurance policy exclusion, visit : brainly.com/question/14307093
#SPJ11
The Law in U.S. History—Top Ten Legal Decisions
Consider the development of the legal system in the United States. Evaluate Colonial laws, the US Constitution, Congressional legislation, Supreme Court decisions, amendments, and local and state laws that illustrate significant historical developments. ALL ITEMS must be EXPLICIT and include specific analysis and historical context. Each analysis should discuss the impact and/or significance of American legal developments from the Colonial Era to the Civil War.
The development of the legal system in the United States can be traced through key historical events such as the establishment of colonial laws, the ratification of the US Constitution, landmark Supreme Court decisions, the enactment of congressional legislation, and pivotal moments in the fight against slavery, all of which shaped the nation's legal framework and constitutional principles. These legal developments reflect the evolving understanding of individual rights, federal power, and the abolition of slavery.
The development of the legal system in the United States can be understood through various significant historical developments. Here are ten key legal decisions that illustrate the progression of American law from the Colonial Era to the Civil War:
1. Colonial Laws: In the Colonial Era, laws were established by the British Crown and colonial legislatures. For example, the Mayflower Compact (1620) established self-governance in Plymouth Colony, laying the foundation for future democratic principles.
2. US Constitution: Ratified in 1788, the US Constitution serves as the supreme law of the land. It established the structure of the federal government, defined individual rights, and outlined the division of powers between the states and the federal government.
3. Congressional Legislation: The Alien and Sedition Acts (1798) passed by Congress during the John Adams administration, restricted immigration and limited free speech, sparking debates about constitutional rights and federal power.
4. Supreme Court Decisions: Marbury v. Madison (1803) was a landmark Supreme Court case that established the principle of judicial review, granting the Court the power to interpret the Constitution and declare laws unconstitutional.
5. Amendments: The Bill of Rights, consisting of the first ten amendments to the Constitution, guarantees fundamental rights and freedoms. For example, the First Amendment protects freedom of speech, religion, and assembly.
6. Local and State Laws: States have the power to enact their own laws within the boundaries set by the Constitution. For instance, Southern states enacted "Black Codes" in the post-Civil War era, which restricted the rights of newly freed African Americans.
7. McCulloch v. Maryland (1819): This Supreme Court case established the principle of implied powers, affirming the federal government's authority to create a national bank. It clarified the balance of power between the federal and state governments.
8. Dred Scott v. Sandford (1857): In a highly controversial decision, the Supreme Court ruled that enslaved African Americans were not US citizens and therefore could not sue for their freedom. This decision deepened sectional tensions leading up to the Civil War.
9. Fugitive Slave Act (1850): This Congressional legislation required the return of escaped slaves to their owners, even in states where slavery was prohibited. It heightened tensions between slaveholding and non-slaveholding states and played a role in fueling the abolitionist movement.
10. Emancipation Proclamation (1863): Issued by President Abraham Lincoln during the Civil War, this executive order declared that all slaves in Confederate-held territory were to be set free. While it didn't immediately free all slaves, it marked a significant turning point in the fight against slavery.
Each of these legal developments had a profound impact on American history, shaping the course of the nation and reflecting the evolving understanding of individual rights, federal power, and the institution of slavery. These examples demonstrate the complexity and significance of the legal system in the United States from the Colonial Era to the Civil War.
To know more about US Constitution visit: brainly.com/question/453546
#SPJ11
