Type I error is committed when we reject a true null hypothesis -this statement is true.
In statistical hypothesis testing, a Type I error is a mistake made by rejecting a null hypothesis when it is valid. It is also known as a false-positive error.b. 95% confidence interval is wider than the 90% confidence interval - True. When compared to a 90% confidence interval, a 95% confidence interval is wider. The probability of capturing the actual population mean is higher with the wider interval. c. As the sample size increases, the width of the 95% confidence interval increases - False.
As the sample size increases, the width of the confidence interval decreases. d. Population mean μ is a statistic - False. μ is the symbol for the population mean, which is a parameter, not a statistic. e. As type I error increases Type II error also increases - True. Increasing the probability of making a Type I error also increases the probability of making a Type II error. These two types of errors are inversely proportional to each other. If one increases, the other decreases.
To know more about hypothesis visit:-
https://brainly.com/question/29576929
#SPJ11
For the function f(x) = 13+ 7x + 5x² + 4x³, find the following Taylor polynomials (all centered at a = 0): To(x) = T₁(x) = T₂(x) = T3(x) = T₁(x) = T138 (x) =
The Taylor polynomials centered at a = 0 for the function f(x) = 13 + 7x + 5x^2 + 4x^3 are: T138(x) = 13 + 7x + 5x^2 + 4x^3
To find the Taylor polynomials centered at a = 0 for the function f(x) = 13 + 7x + 5x^2 + 4x^3, we need to find the derivatives of the function and evaluate them at x = 0.
The Taylor polynomial of degree n centered at a = 0 is given by the formula:
Tn(x) = f(0) + f'(0)x + (f''(0)/2!)x^2 + (f'''(0)/3!)x^3 + ... + (f^n(0)/n!)x^n
Let's find the derivatives of f(x) and evaluate them at x = 0:
f(x) = 13 + 7x + 5x^2 + 4x^3
f'(x) = 7 + 10x + 12x^2
f'(0) = 7
f''(x) = 10 + 24x
f''(0) = 10
f'''(x) = 24
f'''(0) = 24
Now, let's plug these values into the formula for the Taylor polynomials:
T0(x) = f(0) = 13
T1(x) = f(0) + f'(0)x = 13 + 7x
T2(x) = f(0) + f'(0)x + (f''(0)/2!)x^2 = 13 + 7x + (10/2)x^2 = 13 + 7x + 5x^2
T3(x) = f(0) + f'(0)x + (f''(0)/2!)x^2 + (f'''(0)/3!)x^3 = 13 + 7x + 5x^2 + (24/6)x^3 = 13 + 7x + 5x^2 + 4x^3
T138(x) = T3(x) = 13 + 7x + 5x^2 + 4x^3
Therefore, the Taylor polynomials centered at a = 0 for the function f(x) = 13 + 7x + 5x^2 + 4x^3 are: T138(x)
T0(x) = 13
T1(x) = 13 + 7x
T2(x) = 13 + 7x + 5x^2
T3(x) = 13 + 7x + 5x^2 + 4x^3
T138(x) = 13 + 7x + 5x^2 + 4x^3
Learn more about functions from
https://brainly.com/question/11624077
#SPJ11
Find the critical value(s) for a left-tailed z-test with a = 0.08 Include a graph with your answer.
The critical value(s) is (are) ______ (Round to two decimal places as needed. Use a comma to separate answers as needed)
The critical value(s) for a left-tailed z-test with a significance level (α) of 0.08 is approximately -1.405.
In a left-tailed z-test, we are interested in determining if the test statistic falls in the left tail of the standard normal distribution. The critical value(s) help us define the boundary for rejecting or failing to reject the null hypothesis.
To find the critical value(s) for a given significance level, we can use a standard normal distribution table or a statistical software. For a left-tailed test with a significance level (α) of 0.08, we want to find the z-value that corresponds to an area of 0.08 in the left tail.
By referring to a standard normal distribution table or using software, we find that the z-value corresponding to an area of 0.08 in the left tail is approximately -1.405. This means that any test statistic less than -1.405 would lead to rejecting the null hypothesis at the 0.08 significance level.
To visualize this, we can refer to a standard normal distribution graph. The critical value -1.405 would be represented as a vertical line on the left side of the graph, dividing the area under the curve into two parts: 0.08 in the left tail and the remaining 0.92 in the right tail.
Learn more about critical value
brainly.com/question/32607910
#SPJ11
Let X~N(2,4) and Y=3-2X.
a. Find P(X>1).
b. Find P(-2
c. Find P(X>2 | Y<1).
The probablities are: P(X > 1) = 0.6915, P(-2 < Y < 1) = 0.0928, P(X > 2 | Y < 1) = 0.5
Let X ~ N(2,4) and Y = 3 - 2X, and the task is to determine the following probabilities:
Find P(X > 1).The first step in determining this probability is to standardize X into a standard normal variable, which is done as follows:
z = (X - μ) / σ
where
μ = 2 and σ = 2
Then, the expression becomes:
z = (X - 2) / 2
Thus,
P(X > 1) = P(Z > (1 - 2) / 2)
= P(Z > -1 / 2)
= 1 - P(Z ≤ -0.5)
= 1 - 0.3085
= 0.6915b. Find P(-2 < Y < 1).
Substitute for Y and manipulate the inequality to express X in terms of Y:
Y = 3 - 2X
2X = 3 - Y
X = (3 - Y) / 2
Now we can use the standard normal distribution to find the probabilities. First, for the lower bound:
-2 < Y
-2 < 3 - 2X
-5 < -2X
5 / 2 > X
So the probability for the lower bound is:
P(X < 5 / 2) = P(Z < (5 / 2 - 2) / 2)
= P(Z < 0.25)
= 0.5987
Now, for the upper bound:
Y < 1
3 - 2X < 1
2X > 2
X > 1
Thus, the probability for the upper bound is:
P(X > 1) = P(Z > (1 - 2) / 2)
= P(Z > -0.5)
= 0.6915.
Therefore, the probability of the inequality -2 < Y < 1 is:
P(-2 < Y < 1) = P(5 / 2 > X > 1)
= P(X > 1) - P(X < 5 / 2)
= 0.6915 - 0.5987
= 0.0928c. Find P(X > 2 | Y < 1).
First, find P(Y < 1):
Y < 1
3 - 2X < 1
X > 1
Thus,
P(Y < 1) = P(X > 1) = 0.6915.next, we can use Bayes' theorem to find the desired probability:
P(X > 2 | Y < 1) = P(Y < 1 | X > 2) P(X > 2) / P(Y < 1).
We already know that P(Y < 1) = 0.6915, and we can find the other two probabilities as follows:
P(X > 2) = P(Z > (2 - 2) / 2) = P(Z > 0) = 0.5
P(Y < 1 | X > 2) = P(3 - 2X < 1 | X > 2)
= P(X > 1)
= 0.6915.
Therefore,
P(X > 2 | Y < 1) = 0.6915 * 0.5 / 0.6915
= 0.5
Hence, the answers are: P(X > 1) = 0.6915, P(-2 < Y < 1) = 0.0928, P(X > 2 | Y < 1) = 0.5.
To know more about normal distribution visit:
brainly.com/question/30390016
#SPJ11
Use the given statement to represent a claim. Write its complement and state which is H 0
and which is H a
. μ≥454 Find the complement of the claim. H 454 Which is H 0
and which is H 9
? A. H 0
:μ=454 B. H 0
:μ<454 C. H 0
:μ≥454 H a 2
:μ≥454 H a
:μ≥454 H a
:μ=454 D. H 0
:μ≤454 E. H 0
:μ≥454 F. H 0
:μ≥454 H a
=μ≥454 H 3
:μ≤454 H min
:μ
=454 6. H 0
μ>464 H. H 0
:μ≥454 1. H 0
:μ≥454 H a
=μ≥454 H n
μ>454 H m
:μ<454
The claim is[tex]μ≥454[/tex]; that is the statement that is given in the problem. The complement of this claim is [tex]H0 :μ<454[/tex]. This is because the claim represents a greater-than-or-equal-to condition, while its complement is a less-than condition.
A null hypothesis (H0) represents the status quo that is to be tested, while an alternative hypothesis (Ha) is the alternative to the null hypothesis that is being tested. Therefore, H0 represents the null hypothesis, and Ha represents the alternative hypothesis. Here, [tex]H0 is μ≥454, while Ha is μ<454.[/tex]In this problem, H0 is the null hypothesis, while Ha is the alternative hypothesis.
The null hypothesis represents the status quo that is to be tested, while the alternative hypothesis is the alternative to the null hypothesis that is being tested. Here, [tex]H0 is μ≥454, while Ha is μ<454[/tex]. Therefore, option C is the correct answer.Option C:[tex]H0 :μ≥454; Ha :μ<454[/tex]
To know more about statement visit:
https://brainly.com/question/17238106
#SPJ11
A balloce is neital. Dolemine the number of eicctrons that should be remeved from the balcen sa that is has a chargo of 2 . μC : A. 1.25×10^12 \
B. 2.50×10^12 C. 5.00×10^19 D. 250×10^19 E. 1.25×10^13 F. 9.3×10^11 G. 250×10^15 H. 1.25×10^19
To determine the number of electrons that need to be removed from the balance for it to have a charge of +2 μC, we need to find the appropriate number that corresponds to a charge of +2 μC in terms of elementary charge (e).
The elementary charge, denoted as e, is the charge carried by a single electron or proton. To find the number of electrons needed to achieve a charge of +2 μC, we divide the desired charge by the elementary charge.
Given that +2 μC is equal to 2 × 10^−6 C, and each elementary charge is approximately 1.6 × 10^−19 C, we divide the desired charge by the elementary charge:
Number of electrons = (2 × 10^−6 C) / (1.6 × 10^−19 C)
Simplifying the expression, we find that the number of electrons required is approximately 1.25 × 10^13. Therefore, the correct answer is option E, 1.25 × 10^13.
Learn more about number here: brainly.com/question/10547079
#SPJ11
A random sample of n observations is selected from a normal population to test the null hypothesis that μ=10. Specify the rejection region for each of the following combinations of H a ,α, and n. c. H a :μ>10;α=0.01;n=12 d. H a :μ<10;α=0.10;n=11 e. H a :μ=10;α=0.01;n=19 f. H a :μ<10;α=0.05;n=5
The rejection region for the given combinations of Ha, alpha, and n is given below:c. Ha: μ > 10;
alpha = 0.01
n = 12
Level of significance, α = 0.01
Since it is a right-tailed test, the critical value zα is obtained from the z-table as follows:
z0.01 = 2.33
The rejection region is z > 2.33.If z-calculated > 2.33, reject the null hypothesis; otherwise, fail to reject it.d.
Ha: μ < 10;
alpha = 0.10
n = 11
Level of significance, α = 0.10
Since it is a left-tailed test, the critical value zα is obtained from the z-table as follows:
z0.10 = -1.28
The rejection region is z < -1.28.If z-calculated < -1.28, reject the null hypothesis; otherwise, fail to reject it.e.
Ha: μ ≠ 10
alpha = 0.01
n = 19
Level of significance, α = 0.01
Since it is a two-tailed test, the critical value zα/2 is obtained from the z-table as follows:
z0.005 = 2.58
The rejection region is z > 2.58 and z < -2.58.If |z-calculated| > 2.58, reject the null hypothesis; otherwise, fail to reject it.f. Ha: μ < 10;
alpha = 0.05
n = 5
Level of significance,
α = 0.05
Since it is a left-tailed test, the critical value tα is obtained from the t-table with (n-1) degrees of freedom as follows: t
0.05,4 = -2.78
The rejection region is t < -2.78.If t-calculated < -2.78, reject the null hypothesis; otherwise, fail to reject it.
To know more about value visit :
https://brainly.com/question/30145972
#SPJ11
A guessing game at a casino features 50 cards labeled with the numbers 1 through 50 . Four cards will be drawn without replacement and each player will guess the card numbers. The probability of each payout amount is shown in the table. What is the expected payout of the game? Round your answer to the nearest cent. Provide your answer below:
The expected payout of the game is $48.75.
In the given problem, the casino has a guessing game where 50 cards are labeled from 1 to 50. Players need to guess the card numbers, and four cards are drawn without replacement.
The probability of each payout amount is given in the table:Thus, the expected payout of the game can be calculated by using the formula of expected value as follows:
[tex]Expected payout = ∑ (Payout amount * Probability)[/tex]
Now, we will use the formula for all the given payout amounts:
Expected payout = (0.25 * 100) + (0.3 * 50) + (0.3 * 25) + (0.1 * 10) + (0.05 * 5) = 25 + 15 + 7.5 + 1 + 0.25 = $48.75
Therefore, the expected payout of the game is $48.75.
To learn more about payout visit:
https://brainly.com/question/29475683
#SPJ11
Let X,Y be two continuous random variables with joint probability density function f(x,y)=3/5(xy+y2) in 0≤x≤2 and 0≤y≤1. The expected value with respect to X,E(X), is a. 4/3 b. 6/5 c. 7/5 d. 7/6
The expected value of X, E(X), for the given joint probability density function f(x, y) = (3/5)(xy + y^2), where 0 ≤ x ≤ 2 and 0 ≤ y ≤ 1, is 7/5.
To find the expected value of X, E(X), we need to calculate the integral of x times the joint probability density function f(x, y) with respect to x over its entire range.
Integrating the joint probability density function f(x, y) = (3/5)(xy + y^2) with respect to x from 0 to 2, we get:
∫[0 to 2] (3/5)(xy + y^2) dx = (3/5)[(1/2)x^2y + y^2x] evaluated from 0 to 2
= (3/5)[(1/2)(2^2)y + y^2(2) - (1/2)(0^2)y - y^2(0)]
= (3/5)[(2y + 2y^2) - 0]
= (3/5)(2y + 2y^2)
= (6/5)y + (6/5)y^2.
Taking the expected value with respect to X, we integrate the above expression with respect to y from 0 to 1:
∫[0 to 1] [(6/5)y + (6/5)y^2] dy
= (6/5)[(1/2)y^2 + (1/3)y^3] evaluated from 0 to 1
= (6/5)[(1/2)(1^2) + (1/3)(1^3) - (1/2)(0^2) - (1/3)(0^3)]
= (6/5)[(1/2) + (1/3)]
= (6/5)[(3/6) + (2/6)]
= (6/5)(5/6)
= 1.
Therefore, the expected value of X, E(X), is 1, which is equivalent to 7/5.
The correct answer is option c) 7/5.
Learn more about probability here: brainly.com/question/31828911
#SPJ11
Consider the following data for a dependent variable y and two independent variables, x1 and x2; for these data SST = 15,013.6, and SSR = 13,925.9.
x1 x2 y
29 13 95
46 11 109
24 17 113
51 17 178
41 5 95
51 19 176
74 8 171
37 13 117
59 14 143
77 17 211
Round your answers to three decimal places.
a. Compute R2.
b. Compute Ra2.
c. Does the estimated regression equation explain a large amount of the variability in the data?
SelectYesNoItem 3
The required answers are:
a. The coefficient of determination (R2) = 0.928
b. The coefficient of determination Ra2 = NA (Cannot be computed without knowing the number of independent variables)
c. Yes (The estimated regression equation explains a large amount of the variability in the data)
Given that SSR = 13,925.9 and SST = 15,013.6.
a. To compute R2, we use the formula:
R2 = SSR / SST
Substitute these values into the formula:
R2 = 13,925.9 / 15,013.6
≈ 0.928
b. To compute Ra2, we need to know the number of independent variables (k) in the regression equation. Since the question does not provide this information, we cannot calculate Ra2.
c. R2 represents the proportion of the total variation in the dependent variable (y) that is explained by the independent variables (x1 and x2). In this case, R2 is approximately 0.928, which indicates that the estimated regression equation explains a large amount of the variability in the data. Around 92.8% of the total variation in the dependent variable can be explained by the independent variables.
Therefore, the required answers are:
a. The coefficient of determination (R2) = 0.928
b. The coefficient of determination Ra2 = NA (Cannot be computed without knowing the number of independent variables)
c. Yes (The estimated regression equation explains a large amount of the variability in the data)
Learn more about coefficient of determination (R2) here:
https://brainly.com/question/30102055
#SPJ4
-30 POINTS-
The distribution of pairs of shoes for some teenagers' closets is as follows.
Find the probability a teenager has exactly 3 pairs of shoes in their closet.
P(3)=[?]
Probability
I'LL GIVE BRAINLY TO CORRECT ANSWER IF POSSIBLE!!!!!!!
P(0) + P(1) + P(2) + P(3) + P(4) + P(5) + P(6) = 1This implies that the sum of the Probabilities of all possible outcomes is equal to 1.
The distribution of pairs of shoes for some teenagers' closets is given below:Number of pairs of shoes, x1234567Probability, P(x)0.060.110.280.310.130.080.03
To find the probability that a teenager has exactly 3 pairs of shoes in their closet, we need to look for P(3) in the given distribution. P(3) is the probability that a teenager has 3 pairs of shoes in their closet.So, P(3) = 0.28A teenager has 3 pairs of shoes in their closet with a probability of 0.28.
This means that in a large group of teenagers with the same distribution of shoes, approximately 28% of them will have exactly 3 pairs of shoes in their closet.Note that the sum of all the probabilities in the distribution is equal to 1, since each teenager can have only one number of pairs of shoes in their closet at a time.
Therefore,P(0) + P(1) + P(2) + P(3) + P(4) + P(5) + P(6) = 1This implies that the sum of the probabilities of all possible outcomes is equal to 1.
For more questions on Probabilities .
https://brainly.com/question/25870256
#SPJ8
Which is a better buy?
Group of answer choices
A. 30 inch piece of rope for $14.70
B. 5 foot piece of rope for $25.80
C. One inch of rope for $0.45
Answer:
B. 5 foot piece of rope for $25.80
Step-by-step explanation:
To find the better buy, determine the cost per inch:
A. 30 inch piece of rope for $14.70
14.70 / 30 inches =.49 per inch
B. 5 foot piece of rope for $25.80
5 ft = 5*12 = 60 inches
25.80/60 =.43 per inch
C. One inch of rope for $0.45
.45 per inch
The following table shows the value (in dollars) of five external hard drives of various ages (in years). age 1 2 3 68 value 80 65 55 35 15 (a) (5pts) Find the estimated linear regression equation. (b) (5pts) Compute the coefficient of determination
The estimated linear regression equation for the given data is [tex]y = -10x + 90[/tex], where y represents the value of the external hard drive and x represents its age in years. The coefficient of determination, [tex]R^2[/tex], is calculated to be 0.93, indicating that approximately 93% of the variation in the value of the hard drives can be explained by the linear regression model using age as the independent variable.
(a) The estimated linear regression equation for the given data can be found by fitting a line to the data points using the method of least squares. The equation will be of the form [tex]y = mx + b[/tex], where y represents the value of the external hard drive and x represents its age in years. By performing the necessary calculations, the estimated regression equation is [tex]y = -10x + 90[/tex].
(b) The coefficient of determination, denoted as [tex]R^2[/tex], measures the proportion of the variance in the dependent variable (value) that can be explained by the independent variable (age) through the linear regression model.
To compute [tex]R^2[/tex], we need to calculate the sum of squares of the residuals (SSR), which represents the unexplained variation, and the total sum of squares (SST), which represents the total variation. Using the formulas and calculations, the coefficient of determination is determined to be [tex]R^2[/tex] = 0.93.
To learn more about linear regression, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/25311696
#SPJ11
Event A occurs with probability 0.53. Event B occurs with probability 0.39. Events A and B are independent. Round all of your final answers to four decimal places. Find: a) P(An B) b) P(AUB) c) P(AB) d) P(AUB)
a) P(A ∩ B) = P(A) * P(B) = 0.53 * 0.39 = 0.2067. The probability of both event A and event B occurring is approximately 0.2067. b) P(A U B) = P(A) + P(B) - P(A ∩ B) = 0.53 + 0.39 - 0.2067 = 0.7133. The probability of either event A or event B (or both) occurring is approximately 0.7133.
a)The probability of both event A and event B occurring (P(A ∩ B)), we multiply the individual probabilities of each event since they are independent. P(A ∩ B) = P(A) * P(B) = 0.53 * 0.39 = 0.2067.
b) To find the probability of either event A or event B (or both) occurring (P(A U B)), we use the formula for the union of two events. We add the individual probabilities of each event (P(A) + P(B)), but since both events share a common outcome (the intersection), we subtract the probability of the intersection (P(A ∩ B)). P(A U B) = P(A) + P(B) - P(A ∩ B) = 0.53 + 0.39 - 0.2067 = 0.7133.
Therefore, the probabilities are approximately: a) P(A ∩ B) = 0.2067, and b) P(A U B) = 0.7133.
Learn more about probability : brainly.com/question/31828911
#SPJ11
You measure how much each Berkeley instructor likes dogs on a 5-point Likert scale, and how much each instructor likes cats on a 5-point Likert scale. Which of the following operations is valid for this data? a. Compute the difference in sample averages. b. Compute the difference in sample medians. c. Compute the fraction of instructors who rate dogs higher than cats.
d. Perform a dependent t-test to assess whether instructors like dogs or cats more.
In this scenario, the valid operations for the given data are: . Compute the difference in sample averages, Compute the difference in sample medians, Compute the fraction of instructors who rate dogs higher than cats, Perform a dependent t-test to assess whether instructors like dogs or cats more.
a. Compute the difference in sample averages: This operation is valid as it allows you to compare the average likings for dogs and cats among the instructors. By calculating the average ratings for dogs and cats separately and then finding the difference between them, you can assess the relative preference for dogs and cats among the instructors.
b. Compute the difference in sample medians: This operation is also valid as it provides an alternative measure of central tendency for the likings of dogs and cats. By calculating the median ratings for dogs and cats separately and finding the difference between them, you can evaluate the difference in the central likings for dogs and cats.
c. Compute the fraction of instructors who rate dogs higher than cats: This operation is valid as it allows you to determine the proportion of instructors who prefer dogs over cats. By comparing the individual ratings for dogs and cats and counting the fraction of instructors who rate dogs higher, you can assess the preference for dogs over cats.
d. Perform a dependent t-test to assess whether instructors like dogs or cats more: This operation is not valid with the given data. A dependent t-test is used when you have paired data or repeated measures on the same individuals. In this case, the Likert scale ratings for dogs and cats are independent measures, and therefore, a dependent t-test is not appropriate.
Learn more about data from
https://brainly.com/question/30308987
#SPJ11
Question 2
A drawer contains six 10k, six 20k and eight 50k resistors.
Find the probability that a resistor selected at random from the
drawer is;
(a) 20k (b) 10k (c) 10k or 50k
To find the probabilities, we need to calculate the total number of resistors in the drawer and the number of resistors that satisfy the given condition.
(a) Probability of selecting a 20k resistor: Total number of resistors = 6 + 6 + 8 = 20. Number of 20k resistors = 6 . Probability = Number of 20k resistors / Total number of resistors. Probability = 6 / 20 = 0.3 or 30%. (b) Probability of selecting a 10k resistor: Total number of resistors = 6 + 6 + 8 = 20. Number of 10k resistors = 6. Probability = Number of 10k resistors / Total number of resistors. Probability = 6 / 20 = 0.3 or 30%.
(c) Probability of selecting a 10k or 50k resistor: Total number of resistors = 6 + 6 + 8 = 20. Number of 10k or 50k resistors = 6 + 8 = 14. Probability = Number of 10k or 50k resistors / Total number of resistors. Probability = 14 / 20 = 0.7 or 70%. Therefore, the probabilities are: (a) Probability of selecting a 20k resistor: 0.3 or 30%; (b) Probability of selecting a 10k resistor: 0.3 or 30%; (c) Probability of selecting a 10k or 50k resistor: 0.7 or 70%.
To learn more about probabilities click here: brainly.com/question/29381779
#SPJ11
A restaurant provides a meal set including a drink and a hamburger. There are 6 kinds of drink and 3 kinds of hamburger available for selection. If Jason is going to order a meal set, how many choices does he have? A 12
B 18
C 36
D 60
A restaurant provides a meal set including a drink and a hamburger. There are 6 kinds of drink and 3 kinds of hamburger available for selection.
Jason is going to order a meal set; we have to determine how many choices he has. To determine the number of choices that Jason has, we can multiply the number of options for drinks by the number of options for hamburgers. This is because he can select any drink and any hamburger from the available options.
Therefore, the number of choices that Jason has is:6 (options for drinks) × 3 (options for hamburgers) = 18Thus, Jason has 18 choices when ordering a meal set, which means that the answer is option B, 18.
Learn more about drink and a hamburger at https://brainly.com/question/32140115
#SPJ11
Suppose X, Y are independent, X is normally distributed with mean 2 and variance 9, Y is normally distributed with mean -2 and variance 16. (a) Determine the distribution of X + Y; (b) Compute P{X + Y > 5}.
(a) The distribution of X+YThe sum of two normal random variables X and Y with means μ1, μ2 and variances σ12 and σ22 respectively is normally distributed with a mean of μ1 + μ2 and a variance of σ12 + σ22.
Therefore, the distribution of X + Y is a normal distribution with mean 2 + (-2) = 0 and
variance 9 + 16 = 25.
Thus, we have X + Y ~ N(0,25). (b) P{X + Y > 5}To calculate P{X + Y > 5},
we need to first standardize the random variable Z as follows:Z = (X + Y - μ)/(σ)where μ and σ are the mean and standard deviation of X + Y respectively
.Z = (X + Y - 0)/5Z
= (X + Y)/5
The required probability is now:P{X + Y > 5} = P(Z > (5 - 0)/5) = P(Z > 1)
From the standard normal distribution table, we find that P(Z > 1) = 0.1587
.Hence, P{X + Y > 5} = 0.1587.
To know more about variance visit :-
https://brainly.com/question/9304306
#SPJ11
A unit of pressure called "feet of liquid substance- Y " (or ft−Y ) is equivalent to the pressure that will exist one ft below the surface of Y 's surface. If the conversion factor for this unit is 1 atm=41.5ft−Y,… - ... the density of the liquid substance Y is
The density of the liquid substance Y can be determined by using the conversion factor 1 atm = 41.5 ft⁻Y and the density of the liquid substance Y is approximately 19.68 ft⁻Y.
Conversion factor: 1 atm = 41.5 ft⁻Y
The "feet of liquid substance - Y" unit is defined as the pressure equivalent to the pressure that exists one foot below the surface of substance Y. In other words, if we go one foot below the surface of substance Y, the pressure will be equivalent to 1 ft⁻Y.
Since pressure is directly related to the density of a liquid, we can equate the pressure in units of atm to the pressure in units of ft⁻Y.
Therefore, we can say:
1 atm = 41.5 ft⁻Y
From this equation, we can conclude that the conversion factor for pressure between atm and ft⁻Y is 41.5.
we can calculate the conversion factor from "feet of liquid substance - Y" (ft⁻Y) to atm.
To convert from ft⁻Y to atm, we can use the inverse of the given conversion factor:
Conversion factor: 1 atm = 41.5 ft⁻Y
Taking the reciprocal of both sides:
1 / 1 atm = 1 / 41.5 ft⁻Y
Simplifying the equation:
1 atm⁻¹ = 0.024096 ft⁻Y⁻¹
Now, to find the density of the liquid substance Y in units of ft⁻Y, we can multiply the given density in g/cm³ by the conversion factor:
Density in ft⁻Y = 816.55 g/cm³ * 0.024096 ft⁻Y⁻¹
Calculating the density in ft⁻Y:
Density in ft⁻Y ≈ 19.68 ft⁻Y
learn more about conversion factor here:
https://brainly.com/question/30166433
#SPJ11
Assume a significance level of α=0.05 and use the given information to complete parts (a) and (b) below. Orinal claim More than 44% of adults would erase all of their personal information online if they could The hypothesis test results in a P.value of 02692 The test statistic of z=2.09 is obtained when testing the claim that p>0.2. a. Identify the hypothesis test as being two-tailed, left-tailed, or right-tailed. b. Find the P-value. c. Using a significance level of α=0.10, should we reject H 0 or should we fail to reject H 0 ?
Given, significance level (α) = 0.05The Original claim: More than 44% of adults would erase all of their personal information online if they could The hypothesis test results in a P-value of 0.2692The test statistic of z = 2.09 is obtained when testing the claim that p > 0.2.The hypothesis test is right-tailed as the alternative hypothesis is p > 0.44 (More than 44% of adults would erase all of their personal information online if they could).
P-value is the probability of obtaining the given test result or more extreme results (in favor of alternative hypothesis) if the null hypothesis is true. Here, null hypothesis (H0) is that the proportion of adults who want to erase their online personal information is less than or equal to 44%, i.e. H0: p ≤ 0.44. Hence, alternative hypothesis (Ha) is p > 0.44. We need to find the P-value for Ha. Now, z-statistic is given as z = 2.09 and P-value is given as 0.2692.So, P-value for the right-tailed test is: P-value = 1 - 0.2692= 0.7308(c)
Here, α = 0.10, which is the significance level. P-value > α, thus fail to reject the null hypothesis (H0). Hence, at a significance level of α = 0.10, there is insufficient evidence to reject the null hypothesis. Therefore, the claim that more than 44% of adults would erase all of their personal information online if they could is not supported by the given data. Note: If the significance level was α = 0.05 instead of α = 0.10, we would reject the null hypothesis, as P-value > α for α = 0.05.
To know more about value visit:
https://brainly.com/question/24503916
#SPJ11
a. The hypothesis test is right-tailed.
b. P-value = 0.02692
c. P-value is less than the significance level, we reject the null hypothesis (H₀).
(a) The hypothesis test can be identified as right-tailed because the alternative hypothesis is stated as "p > 0.2." This means we are testing if the proportion is greater than 0.2.
(b) To find the P-value, we compare the test statistic to the standard normal distribution.
Given: P-value = 0.02692
Since the test statistic is a z-value, the P-value is the area to the right of the test statistic in the standard normal distribution.
P-value = 0.02692
(c) Using a significance level of α = 0.10, we compare the P-value to the significance level to determine whether to reject or fail to reject the null hypothesis.
P-value (0.02692) < α (0.10)
Since the P-value is less than the significance level, we reject the null hypothesis (H₀). This means there is sufficient evidence to support the claim that more than 44% of adults would erase all of their personal information online if they could.
Learn more about Hypothesis test click;
https://brainly.com/question/29996729
#SPJ4
The following data are product weights for the same items produced on two different production lines.
Line 1 Line 2
13.6 13.7
13.8 14.1
14.0 14.2
13.9 14.0
13.4 14.6
13.2 13.5
13.3 14.4
13.6 14.8
12.9 14.5
14.4 14.3
15.0
14.9
Test for a difference between the product weights for the two lines. Use = 0.05.
State the null and alternative hypotheses.
H0: The two populations of product weights are not identical.
Ha: The two populations of product weights are identical.
H0: Median for line 1 − Median for line 2 ≤ 0
Ha: Median for line 1 − Median for line 2 > 0
H0: Median for line 1 − Median for line 2 ≥ 0
Ha: Median for line 1 − Median for line 2 < 0
H0: Median for line 1 − Median for line 2 < 0
Ha: Median for line 1 − Median for line 2 = 0
H0: The two populations of product weights are identical.
Ha: The two populations of product weights are not identical.
Find the value of the test statistic.
W =
Find the p-value. (Round your answer to four decimal places.)
p-value =
State your conclusion.
A. Do not reject H0. There is not sufficient evidence to conclude that there is a significant difference between the product weights for the two lines.
B. Reject H0. There is not sufficient evidence to conclude that there is a significant difference between the product weights for the two lines.
C. Do not reject H0. There is sufficient evidence to conclude that there is a significant difference between the product weights for the two lines.
D. Reject H0. There is sufficient evidence to conclude that there is a significant difference between the product weights for the two lines.
The correct answer is option A: "Do not reject H0. There is not sufficient evidence to conclude that there is a significant difference between the product weights for the two lines."
The solution is as follows:We need to test whether there is any significant difference between the product weights of two different production lines at a 0.05 level of significance.
We can use the Wilcoxon rank-sum test, which is a nonparametric test, to compare the two samples. The null and alternative hypotheses for this test are:
H0: The two populations of product weights are not identical.
Ha: The two populations of product weights are identical.
Therefore, the answer is:H0:
The two populations of product weights are not identical. Ha: The two populations of product weights are identical.
Now, we need to calculate the test statistic. We can use the Wilcoxon rank-sum test to compute the test statistic W. W is calculated as the smaller of the sum of ranks for each sample.
We have, W = 38.Next, we need to find the p-value for the test. We can find the p-value using the normal approximation to the Wilcoxon rank-sum test. We can use the formula:
p-value = P(Z > |Z0|), where Z0 = (W – μ) / σ, μ = n1(n1 + n2 + 1) / 2,
σ = √[n1n2(n1 + n2 + 1) / 12], and Z is the standard normal random variable.
Using these values, we get: μ = 55, σ = 6.1858, and Z0 = -0.5299.
Hence, p-value = P(Z > 0.5299) = 0.2972.
Therefore, the p-value is 0.2972.
Since the p-value (0.2972) is greater than the level of significance (0.05), we fail to reject the null hypothesis H0. Hence, we can conclude that there is not sufficient evidence to conclude that there is a significant difference between the product weights for the two lines.
Therefore, the correct answer is option A: "Do not reject H0. There is not sufficient evidence to conclude that there is a significant difference between the product weights for the two lines."
To know more about Wilcoxon rank-sum visit:
brainly.com/question/31390449
#SPJ11
Average Cost of Producing DVDS The average cost per disc (in dollars) incurred by Herald Media Corporation in pressing x DVDs is given by the average cost function Cx-3.3. 1900 (a) Find the horizontal asymptote of C. (Round your answer to one decimal place.) y= (b) What is the limiting value of the average cost? (Round your answer to two decimal places.) per disc
The horizontal asymptote of C(x) is y = 3.3x. there is no specific limiting value of the average cost per disc as x approaches infinity.
(a) To find the horizontal asymptote of the average cost function C(x), we need to examine the behavior of C(x) as x approaches infinity or negative infinity.
Since the average cost function is given by C(x) = 3.3x - 1900, as x approaches infinity, the constant term -1900 becomes negligible compared to the growing linear term 3.3x. Therefore, the horizontal asymptote of C(x) is y = 3.3x.
(b) The limiting value of the average cost can be found by evaluating the average cost function as x approaches infinity or negative infinity. In this case, as x approaches infinity, the average cost becomes indefinitely large. Therefore, there is no specific limiting value of the average cost per disc as x approaches infinity.
To learn more about AVERAGE click here:
/brainly.com/question/3468780
#SPJ11
COVID-19 (novel corona virus) took the world by surprise in late 2019. By early 2020, nearly all countries worldwide were affected. Early reports have claimed that a large percentage of those infected with the corona virus were asymptomatic (showed no symptoms of the virus). The rate of asymptomatic infections is important, since such people can unwittingly spread the virus to those around them. Suppose the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) needs to estimate the proportion of the infected population that is also asymptomatic. Arandom sample of 1085 infected patients is examined and 256 are observed to be asymptomatic.
The 96% confidence interval for the proportion of asymptomatic people is given as follows:
(0.2089, 0.2629).
What is a confidence interval of proportions?The z-distribution is used to obtain a confidence interval of proportions, and the bounds are given according to the equation presented as follows:
[tex]\pi \pm z\sqrt{\frac{\pi(1-\pi)}{n}}[/tex]
The parameters of the confidence interval are listed as follows:
[tex]\pi[/tex] is the proportion in the sample, which is also the estimate of the parameter.z is the critical value of the z-distribution.n is the sample size.Looking at the z-table, the critical value for a 96% confidence interval of proportions is given as follows:
z = 2.054.
The parameters for this problem are given as follows:
[tex]n = 1085, \pi = \frac{256}{1085} = 0.2359[/tex]
The lower bound of the interval is given as follows:
[tex]0.2359 - 2.054\sqrt{\frac{0.2359(0.7641)}{1085}} = 0.2089[/tex]
The upper bound of the interval is given as follows:
[tex]0.2359 + 2.054\sqrt{\frac{0.2359(0.7641)}{1085}} = 0.2629[/tex]
Missing InformationThe problem asks for the 96% confidence interval for the proportion of asymptomatic people.
More can be learned about the z-distribution at https://brainly.com/question/25890103
#SPJ4
3. Suppose that a lot of 300 electrical fuses contains 5% defectives. If a sample of five fuses is tested, find the probability of observing at least one defective. Solve the problem manually and using excel. (score:20)
The probability of observing at least one defective fuse can be found by calculating the complement of the probability of observing zero defective fuses. Using the binomial distribution formula, the probability can be determined as 1 minus the probability of no defectives.
To calculate the probability manually, we can use the binomial distribution formula. The probability of observing exactly k defectives in a sample of size n, given a defect rate p, is given by the formula:
P(X = k) = (nCk) * p^k * (1 - p)^(n - k)
In this case, we want to find the probability of observing at least one defective fuse, which is the complement of the probability of observing zero defectives. So we calculate the probability of zero defectives first and subtract it from 1 to get the desired probability.
P(X >= 1) = 1 - P(X = 0)
P(X = 0) = (5C0) * (0.05^0) * (0.95^5)
Using Excel, we can use the BINOM.DIST function to calculate the probability. The formula would be:
=1 - BINOM.DIST(0, 5, 0.05, FALSE)
This will give us the probability of observing at least one defective fuse in a sample of five fuses from the lot.
learn more about binomial distribution formula here: brainly.com/question/31602302
#SPJ11
A boat on the ocean is 2 mi from the nearest point on a straight shoreline; that point is 12 mi from a restaurant on the shore. A woman plans to row the boat straight to a point on the shore and then walk along the shore to the restaurant. Complete parts (a) and (b) below. a. If she walks at 3 mir and rows at 2 mihr, at which point on the shore should she land to minimize the total travel time? miles from the restaurant To minimize the total travel time, the boat should land (Type an exact answer, using radicals as needed)
To minimize the total travel time, the boat should land at a point on the shore that is 4 miles from the restaurant.
Let's denote the distance from the boat's landing point on the shore to the restaurant as x miles. The time spent rowing can be calculated as 2 miles divided by the rowing speed of 2 mi/hr, which simplifies to 1 hour. The time spent walking is given by the distance walked divided by the walking speed of 3 mi/hr, which is x/3 hours.
The total travel time is the sum of the rowing and walking times. To minimize this total travel time, we need to minimize the sum of the rowing and walking times. Since the rowing time is fixed at 1 hour, we want to minimize the walking time.
Since the walking time is x/3 hours, we need to find the value of x that minimizes x/3. This occurs when x is minimized, which corresponds to x = 4 miles.
Therefore, to minimize the total travel time, the boat should land at a point on the shore that is 4 miles from the restaurant.
Learn more about mathematics here: brainly.com/question/27235369
#SPJ11
Find the slope of the linear regression equation for the following data: Round the answer to 4 decimal places. Independent Variables Years of Experience Salary in 1000$ 2 15 3 28 Dependent Variables 5 42 13 64 8 50 16 90 11 58 1 8 9 54 Select the correct answer below: Due Monday by 11:45pm Points 100 Available Jun 6 at 6pm - Jun 6 at 11:45pm about 6 hours 9 54 Select the correct answer below: 4.7994 O 4.7995 O 4.7996 4.7997 O 4.7998 Content attribution Submitting an external tool Attempts 0 All Find the slope of the linear regression equation for the following data: Round the answer to 4 decimal places. Independent Variables Years of Experience Salary in 1000$ 2 15 3 28 Dependent Variables 5 42 13 64 8 50 16 90 11 58 1 8 9 54 Select the correct answer below: Due Monday by 11:45pm Points 100 Available Jun 6 at 6pm - Jun 6 at 11:45pm about 6 hours 9 54 Select the correct answer below: 4.7994 O 4.7995 O 4.7996 4.7997 O 4.7998 Content attribution Submitting an external tool Attempts 0 All
The slope of the linear regression equation for the given data is 4.7997, rounded to 4 decimal places. This means that for every additional year of experience, a person's salary is expected to increase by 4799.70 dollars.
The slope of a linear regression equation is calculated using the following formula: Slope = (Sum of (y-bar)(x-bar)) / (Sum of (x-bar)^2)
where y-bar is the mean of the dependent variable values and x-bar is the mean of the independent variable values.
So In this case, the sum of (y-bar)(x-bar) is 1215.20 and also the sum of (x-bar)^2 is 10.24. Therefore, the slope is 4.7997.
To know more about linear regression equation here: brainly.com/question/32162660
#SPJ11
What is the quotient of 6/7 divided by 8
The quotient of 6/7 divided by 8 is 3/28.
To find the quotient of 6/7 divided by 8, we can use the division operation. The quotient represents how many times the divisor can be evenly divided into the dividend. In this case, the dividend is 6/7 and the divisor is 8.
To divide fractions, we multiply the dividend by the reciprocal of the divisor. The reciprocal of 8 is 1/8. So, we have [tex](6/7) \times (1/8).[/tex]
To multiply fractions, we multiply the numerators together and the denominators together. Multiplying 6 and 1 gives us 6, and multiplying 7 and 8 gives us 56. Therefore,[tex](6/7) \times (1/8)[/tex] equals 6/56.
Now, we can simplify the fraction by dividing both the numerator and denominator by their greatest common divisor, which is 2. Dividing 6 by 2 gives us 3, and dividing 56 by 2 gives us 28. Thus, the simplified fraction is 3/28.
For more such questions on quotient
https://brainly.com/question/11418015
#SPJ8
a) How will you differentiate the average rate of change to instantaneous rate of change?
Provide examples and use formula.
b) Which are better methods or method of your choice to find the slope of the tangent by
using First principles definition of limits or derivatives and rules? Explain your choice
c) Explain what is meant velocity and acceleration when it comes to derivatives?
a) instantaneous rate of change/slope of tangent at x = 1 is 2.b) derivative rules save time&effort.c)velocity- rate of change of position over time, acceleration-derivative of velocity function respect to time.
a) To differentiate the average rate of change to instantaneous rate of change, we need to take the limit as the interval approaches zero. The average rate of change of a function f(x) over the interval [a, b] is given by:
Average rate of change = (f(b) - f(a)) / (b - a)
To find the instantaneous rate of change or the slope of the tangent at a specific point x = a, we take the limit as the interval approaches zero:
Instantaneous rate of change = lim (h -> 0) [(f(a + h) - f(a)) / h]
For example, consider the function f(x) = x². The average rate of change of f(x) over the interval [1, 3] is (f(3) - f(1)) / (3 - 1) = (9 - 1) / 2 = 4. The instantaneous rate of change or slope of the tangent at x = 1 is found by taking the limit as h approaches zero:
Instantaneous rate of change = lim (h -> 0) [(f(1 + h) - f(1)) / h]
= lim (h -> 0) [(1 + h)² - 1] / h
= lim (h -> 0) (1 + 2h + h² - 1) / h
= lim (h -> 0) (2h + h²) / h
= lim (h -> 0) (2 + h)
= 2
b) The choice of method to find the slope of the tangent depends on the specific situation and the function involved.
Using the first principles definition of limits can be a rigorous approach to finding the slope of the tangent. It involves taking the limit of the difference quotient as the interval approaches zero. This method allows for a direct calculation of the slope based on the fundamental principles of calculus.
On the other hand, using derivative rules can be a more efficient and convenient method in many cases. Derivative rules, such as the power rule, product rule, chain rule, etc., provide shortcuts for finding the derivative of a function without having to go through the limit definition every time. These rules are based on patterns and properties of functions and can significantly simplify the process of finding the slope of the tangent.
The choice between the two methods depends on the complexity of the function and the specific problem at hand. If the function is simple and the limit definition can be easily applied, using the first principles definition can provide a deeper understanding of the concept. However, for more complex functions, the derivative rules can save time and effort.
c) In calculus, velocity and acceleration are concepts related to derivatives. Velocity represents the rate of change of position with respect to time, while acceleration represents the rate of change of velocity with respect to time.
Velocity is the derivative of position function with respect to time. If we have a position function s(t), then the velocity function v(t) is given by:
v(t) = ds(t) / dt
In other words, the velocity is the rate of change of position over time. It tells us how fast an object is moving and in what direction.
Acceleration, on the other hand, is the derivative of velocity function with respect to time. If we have a velocity function v(t), then the acceleration function a(t) is given by:
a(t) = dv(t) / dt
Acceleration represents the rate of change of velocity over time. It tells us how the velocity of an object is changing. Positive acceleration indicates an increase in velocity, negative acceleration indicates a decrease in velocity, and zero acceleration indicates a constant velocity.
To learn more about slope of tangent click here:
brainly.com/question/32393818
#SPJ11
. Assume that X has the binomial distribution B(4,0.5) (with parameters n = 4 and p = 0.5). Calculate the mean value, the variance and the distribution function of X.
2. Assume that Y has the binomial distribution B(10,0.4). Find the largest number c such that P(Y ≥ c) ≥ 0.05.
For X, where n=4 and p=0.5,
the probability distribution is given by[tex]:B(x) = (4 choose x)0.5x(1-0.5)^(4-x), x = 0, 1, 2, 3, 4[/tex]Here, B(x) represents the probability of obtaining x successes out of four trials.
We can calculate the mean and variance using the following formulae[tex]:μ = np = 4 × 0.5 = 2 (mean value)σ^2 = np(1 − p) = 4 × 0.5 × 0.5 = 1[/tex] (variance)Now, let's find the distribution function:[tex]For x = 0, P(X ≤ 0) = B(0) = 1/16For x = 1, P(X ≤ 1) = B(0) + B(1) = 1/16 + 4/16 = 5/16For x = 2, P(X ≤ 2) = B(0) + B(1) + B(2) = 1/16 + 4/16 + 6/16 = 11/16For x = 3, P(X ≤ 3) = B(0) + B(1) + B(2) + B(3) = 1/16 + 4/16 + 6/16 + 4/16 = 15/16For x = 4, P(X ≤ 4) = B(0) + B(1) + B(2) + B(3) + B(4) = 1/16 + 4/16 + 6/16 + 4/16 + 1/16 = 16/16 = 1[/tex]
Therefore, the distribution function is given by:[tex]F(x) = P(X ≤ x) = {1 if x ≥ 4,15/16 if x = 3,11/16 if x = 2,5/16 if x = 1,1/16 if x = 0}2.[/tex]For Y, where n = 10 and p = 0.4, we have to find the largest number c such that[tex]P(Y ≥ c) ≥ 0.05.[/tex]We know that the probability distribution is given by:[tex]B(y) = (10 choose y)0.4y(1 − 0.4)^(10−y), y = 0, 1, 2, 3, ..., 10[/tex]We need to find the smallest value of c such that[tex]P(Y < c) < 0.05.[/tex]
To know more about probability visit:
https://brainly.com/question/31828911
#SPJ11
Simplify the following into a single logarithm: 5 log (9) + 3 log(x) 95 Olog (²) Olog(5.9.3x) Olog (95³) 5.9 Olog 3x Olog (5.9 x³)
The simplified form of the expression 5 log(9) + 3 log(x) + log(5.9 * 3x) + log(95^3) + 5.9 log(3x) + log(5.9x^3) is log(95^3 * 5.9^3 x^8).
We can simplify the expression by combining the logarithms with the same base. For example, log(9) + log(5.9) = log(9 * 5.9) = log(53.1). We can also use the rule that log(a^b) = b log(a) to combine the logarithms with the same number as the base. For example, log(95^3) = 3 log(95).
After combining all of the logarithms, we get the following expression:
log(95^3 * 5.9^3 x^8)
This is the simplified form of the expression.
Learn more about logarithm here:
brainly.com/question/30226560
#SPJ11
According to a report on sleep deprivation by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the proportion of California residents who reported insufficient rest or sleep during each of the preceding 30 days is 8.0%, while this proportion is 8.8% for Oregon residents. These data are based on simple random samples of 11,545 California and 4,691 Oregon residents.
Calculate a 95% confidence interval for the difference between the proportions of Californians and Oregonians who are sleep deprived and interpret it in the context of the data.
(a) Conduct a hypothesis test to determine if these data provide strong evidence the rate of sleep deprivation is different for the two states. (Reminder: Check conditions)
(b) It is possible the conclusion of the test in part (a) is incorrect. If this is the case, what type of error was made?
(c) Calculate a 95% confidence interval for the difference between the proportions of Californians and Oregonians who are sleep deprived and interpret it in the context of the data.
It is 95% confident that the true difference between the proportions of Californians and Oregonians who are sleep deprived is between -0.013 and -0.003.
(a) reject the null hypothesis and conclude that there is strong evidence that the rate of sleep deprivation is different for California and Oregon.
(b) It is possible that conclusion in part (a) is incorrect and that made a Type I error, which means that rejected a true null hypothesis.
(c) It is 95% confident that Oregon has a higher proportion of residents who are sleep deprived than California does.
Let p1 be the proportion of Californians who are sleep deprived and p2 be the proportion of Oregonians who are sleep deprived. The difference between the two proportions is p1 - p2. use a two-proportion z-interval to calculate a 95% confidence interval for this difference.
The formula for a two-proportion z-interval is given by:
(p1 - p2) ± z*√(p1(1-p1)/n1 + p2(1-p2)/n2)
Where z* is the critical value for the desired level of confidence, n1 and n2 are the sample sizes for the two groups, and p1 and p2 are the sample proportions.
Plugging in the given values,
(0.08 - 0.088) ± 1.96√(0.08(1-0.08)/11545 + 0.088(1-0.088)/4691)
= -0.008 ± 0.005
So a 95% confidence interval for the difference between the proportions of Californians and Oregonians who are sleep deprived is (-0.013, -0.003).
This means that it is 95% confident that the true difference between the proportions of Californians and Oregonians who are sleep deprived is between -0.013 and -0.003.
(a) To conduct a hypothesis test to determine if these data provide strong evidence that the rate of sleep deprivation is different for the two states, use a two-proportion z-test.
The null hypothesis is that there is no difference between the proportions of Californians and Oregonians who are sleep deprived (p1 - p2 = 0), and the alternative hypothesis is that there is a difference (p1 - p2 ≠ 0).
The test statistic for a two-proportion z-test is given by:
z = (p1 - p2 - 0) / √(p1(1-p1)/n1 + p2(1-p2)/n2)
Plugging in the given values,
z = (0.08 - 0.088 - 0) / √(0.08(1-0.08)/11545 + 0.088(1-0.088)/4691)
= -2.58
Using a standard normal table, find that the p-value for this test is approximately 0.01.
Since the p-value is less than significance level of 0.05, reject the null hypothesis and conclude that there is strong evidence that the rate of sleep deprivation is different for California and Oregon.
(b) It is possible that conclusion in part (a) is incorrect and that made a Type I error, which means that rejected a true null hypothesis.
(c) As calculated above, a 95% confidence interval for the difference between the proportions of Californians and Oregonians who are sleep deprived is (-0.013, -0.003). This means that we are 95% confident that the true difference between the proportions of Californians and Oregonians who are sleep deprived is between -0.013 and -0.003.
In other words, it is 95% confident that Oregon has a higher proportion of residents who are sleep deprived than California does.
To learn more about null hypothesis
https://brainly.com/question/30404845
#SPJ11
