Unfortunately you injected lidocaine intra-arterially. The first sign of lidocaine toxicity would be, except....
a. circumoral numbness
b. tongue paresthesia
c. dizziness
d. cold

The surface area of the triangular prism is 588 metres squared.

The surface area of the triangular base prism can be found as follows:

surface area of the prism = (s₁ + s₂ + s₃)l + bh

where

Therefore,

b = 14 m

h = 12 m

s₁ = 15m

s₂ = 13 m

s₃ = 14 m

l = 10 m

Hence,

surface area of the prism = (15 + 13 + 14)10 + 14(12)

surface area of the prism = 420 + 168

Therefore,

surface area of the prism = 588 metres²

learn more on surface area here: https://brainly.com/question/29298005

#SPJ1

The eighth term, a8, of the arithmetic sequence is -17.

An arithmetic sequence is a sequence of the form a, a + d, a + 2d, a + 3d, a + 4d, … The number a is the first term, and d is the common difference of the. sequence.

To find the eighth term, a8, in an arithmetic sequence with the first term a1 = -3 and the common difference d = -2, we can use the formula for the nth term of an arithmetic sequence:

an = a1 + (n - 1) * d

Plugging in the given values, we have:

a8 = -3 + (8 - 1) * (-2)

= -3 + 7 * (-2)

= -3 - 14

= -17

Know more about arithmetic sequence here:

https://brainly.com/question/15412619

#SPJ11

The expected value for the number of swimmers on Thursday is 51.600.

To calculate the expected value for the number of swimmers on Thursday, we need to find the mean or the average number of swimmers on Thursdays based on the given data.

We can use the formula:

Expected Value = (sum of all values) / (total number of values)

Applying this formula to the given data, we get:

Expected Value = (63 + 40 + 40 + 47 + 68) / 5

Expected Value = 258 / 5

Expected Value = 51.6

Rounding this to three decimal places, we get:

Expected Value = 51.600

Therefore, the expected value for the number of swimmers on Thursday is 51.600.

for such more question on expected value

https://brainly.com/question/15858152

#SPJ11

The term you're referring to is the t-test, which is a statistical method used to determine if there is a significant difference between the means of two groups with small sample sizes.

A t-test measures the statistical difference by comparing the means and variances of the two groups, taking into account the number of observations in each group. This method is especially useful when dealing with small sample sizes, as it allows researchers to make inferences about the population based on limited data.

To perform a t-test, you'll first need to calculate the t-value, which is the difference between the two means divided by the standard error of the difference. The standard error of the difference is calculated using the standard deviations and sample sizes of both groups.

Next, you'll compare the t-value to a critical value from the t-distribution table, based on the desired level of significance (typically 0.05) and the degrees of freedom, which is the total number of observations in both groups minus 2.

If the calculated t-value is greater than the critical value, it means that the difference between the two means is statistically significant, and we can reject the null hypothesis (i.e., there is no difference between the two groups). If the t-value is less than the critical value, we fail to reject the null hypothesis, meaning there's insufficient evidence to claim a significant difference between the groups.

In summary, a t-test is a valuable statistical tool for measuring the difference between the means of two groups with small sample sizes, helping researchers determine if the observed differences are due to chance or a true underlying effect.

learn more about t-tests here: brainly.com/question/17938002

#SPJ11

The value of n using the concept of similar triangles is: 24

Similar triangles are defined as triangles that have the same shape, but their sizes may vary. Therefore, if two triangles are similar, then their corresponding angles are congruent and corresponding sides are in equal proportion.

Since Triangle XYZ is similar to triangle PQR, then we can say that:

XY is similar to PQ

YZ is similar to QR

XZ is similar to PR

Thus:

35/28 = 30/n

cross multiply to get:

n = (30 * 28)/35

n = 24

Read more about similar triangles at: https://brainly.com/question/14285697

#SPJ1

As the size of the sample increases, the sampling distribution of sample means becomes more normally distributed.

The Central Limit Theorem (CLT) states that as the sample size increases, the distribution of sample means will become more normally distributed regardless of the shape of the population distribution.

As long as the sample size is sufficiently large (usually greater than 30).

This means that the mean and standard deviation of the sampling distribution of sample means will approach the mean and standard deviation of the population distribution.

In other words, when the sample size is small, the sampling distribution may not follow a normal distribution and may be skewed.

However, as the sample size increases, the effect of the individual observations' randomness on the mean becomes smaller.

Consequently, the distribution of sample means becomes more symmetrical and follows a normal distribution.

Thus, the larger the sample size, the more reliable the estimate of the population mean becomes, and the more likely the distribution of sample means will be normally distributed.

Learn more about shape of sampling distribution

brainly.com/question/27972803

#SPJ11

Not necessarily. A plausible value is one that is reasonable or believable based on the information available.

In the context of statistics, a plausible value for a population parameter is one that falls within a certain range of values with a certain degree of confidence.

For example, if a 95% confidence interval for a population proportion is calculated to be (0.45, 0.55), then a plausible value for the population proportion would be any value within that interval.

However, if a different confidence level were used or a different sample were taken, the confidence interval and therefore the plausible values could be different.

So while 0.50 may be a plausible value for a population proportion in some cases, it cannot be inferred.

To know more about plausible value refer to-

https://brainly.com/question/30901975

#SPJ11

To find the length of side a in triangle ABC, we can use the law of sines:

a/sin(A) = b/sin(B)

We know that m∠A = 40, b = 8, and m∠C = 115. We can find m∠B by using the fact that the sum of the angles in a triangle is 180 degrees:

m∠A + m∠B + m∠C = 180

40 + m∠B + 115 = 180

m∠B = 25

Now we can plug in the values we know into the law of sines and solve for a:

a/sin(40) = 8/sin(25)

a = sin(40) * 8 / sin(25)

a ≈ 11.3 (rounded to the nearest tenth)

Therefore, the length of side a in triangle ABC is approximately 11.3 units, which corresponds to answer option G.

The depth of the oil in the container is 16 cm.

To find the depth of the oil in the container, we need to determine the volume of the oil and then divide it by the cross-sectional area of the container.

Given that the volume of oil is 2.5 liters, we can convert it to cubic centimeters since the units of the container's dimensions are in centimeters.

1 liter is equivalent to 1000 cubic centimeters, so 2.5 liters is equal to 2.5 * 1000 = 2500 cubic centimeters.

The cross-sectional area of the container is a square with a side length of 12.5 cm. The area of a square is calculated by squaring the side length. So, the area of the container is 12.5 cm * 12.5 cm = 156.25 square centimeters.

To find the depth of the oil, we divide the volume of the oil (2500 cubic centimeters) by the cross-sectional area of the container (156.25 square centimeters):

Depth = Volume / Area

Depth = 2500 cm^3 / 156.25 cm^2

Depth = 16 cm

Know more about square here:

https://brainly.com/question/14198272

#SPJ11

This is an incredibly long time, equivalent to about 111,000,000 years!  even with the ability to compute, store, and check for collisions at a rate of 2,000,000 instances per second, finding a collision in SHA3-256 with a probability of at least 1/100,000 is practically impossible.

The probability of finding a collision in a hash function with n-bit output, such as SHA3-256, is roughly proportional to the square root of the number of possible hash values is [tex]2^{(n/2)[/tex].

SHA3-256, n is 256, so the number of possible hash values is

[tex]2^{(256/2)} = 2^{128.[/tex]

Let t be the number of seconds we need to run the computation. In one second, we can compute 2,000,000 instances of SHA3-256.

In t seconds, we can compute 2,000,000t instances of SHA3-256.

The number of pairs of hash values that we can generate from 2,000,000t instances is

(2,000,000t choose 2) = (2,000,000t) × (2,000,000t - 1)/2.

To have a probability of at least 1/100,000 of finding a collision, we need the number of pairs of hash values to be at least 100,000 times the number of possible hash values, which is:

(2,000,000t) × (2,000,000t - 1)/2 >= 100,000 × 2¹²⁸

Simplifying and solving for t, we get:

[tex]t > = \sqrt{((100,000 \times 2^{128})/(2,000,000)^2 - 1/2,000,000)} \approx 3.52 \times 10^{15} seconds[/tex]

For similar questions on collision

https://brainly.com/question/30577686

#SPJ11

The probability at least 1/100,000 of finding a collision is 2.12 x [tex]10^{29[/tex] seconds is approximately [tex]6.73 x 10^{21[/tex] years

In cryptography, a collision occurs when two different inputs produce the same hash output.

The probability of finding a collision increases as the number of inputs increases, and this is what we want to calculate.
Assuming we can compute, store, and check for collisions 2,000,000 instances of SHA-3 (SHA3-256) in one second, we can compute the number of possible inputs that can be hashed in a given time frame.

If we assume a year contains 31,536,000 seconds, then in one year we can compute:
2,000,000 * 31,536,000 = 63,072,000,000,000
That is 63.07 trillion inputs hashed in one year.
Next, we need to calculate the probability of finding a collision among all these inputs.

To do this, we can use the birthday paradox formula, which states that the probability of finding a collision in a set of n items is approximately [tex]n^2[/tex]/[tex]2^{(k+1)[/tex].

Where k is the number of bits in the hash output.

For SHA3-256, k = 256.
So, the probability of finding a collision in our set of hashed inputs is:
63,072,000,00 / 2(256+1) = 0.01266
This is an extremely small probability, which means it would take a very long time to find a collision with a probability of at least 1/100,000.

In fact, we would need to compute and store billions of times more hashes than what we can currently achieve in a year.
Therefore, to answer your question, we can say that even with the ability to compute, store, and check for collisions 2,000,000 instances of SHA-3 (SHA3-256) in one second, it would take an impractical amount of time to find a collision with a probability of at least 1/100,000.

For similar question on probability :

https://brainly.com/question/31120123

#SPJ11

Based on the results of the American Management Association/ePolicy Institute Survey on electronic monitoring and surveillance, companies reported that they had dismissed 30% of workers for misusing the Internet.

The survey conducted by the American Management Association/ePolicy Institute found that among the companies surveyed, 30% reported that they had dismissed employees for Internet misuse. This suggests that companies are taking Internet security seriously and are willing to take action against employees who violate company policies related to Internet use. It also highlights the importance of having clear policies in place to guide employees on appropriate Internet use to avoid potential security risks and the negative consequences that can result from misuse.

Learn more about  percentage

brainly.com/question/29306119

#SPJ11

At a mathematical level, if the two conditions for omitted variable bias are satisfied, then  E(uᵢ| Xᵢ, Wᵢ) = E(uᵢ| Wᵢ)

The correct answer is a. E(uᵢ| Xᵢ, Wᵢ) = E(uᵢ| Wᵢ).

The two conditions for omitted variable bias are:

The omitted variable (Wᵢ) is correlated with the independent variable of interest (Xᵢ).

The omitted variable (Wᵢ) is also related to the dependent variable (Yᵢ).

If these two conditions are satisfied, then the estimated coefficient of Xᵢ will be biased, and the bias will depend on the correlation between Xᵢ and Wᵢ. In this case, the correct specification of the regression model should include the omitted variable Wᵢ.

Option b is incorrect as it describes the assumption of independent and identically distributed (i.i.d.) observations, which is not related to omitted variable bias.

Option c is incorrect as perfect multicollinearity is a situation where there is an exact linear relationship between two or more independent variables, and it can cause numerical problems in estimating the coefficients of the regression model, but it is not related to omitted variable bias.

Option d is incorrect as it describes the presence of outliers and their impact on the regression model, which is also not related to omitted variable bias.

a. E(uᵢ| Xᵢ, Wᵢ) = E(uᵢ| Wᵢ).

For similar question on  mathematical level.

https://brainly.com/question/28027137

#SPJ11

Answer: B

Step-by-step explanation:

Since it's a rug, it's a covering so they want area of the circle

A=[tex]\pi r^{2}[/tex]        

since the length of the of the room is 6.2. that is also the diameter of the circle.

The radius for the formula is half of the diameter.

r=3.1

A=[tex]\pi r^{2}[/tex] = 3.14(3.1)²

=30.2

B

The drone's descent can be modeled by a linear function as the rate of descent is constant.

The slope-intercept definition of a linear function is given as follows:

y = mx + b.

In which:

m is the slope, representing the rate of change.

b is the intercept, representing the value of y when x = 0.

For this problem, we have that the drone descended 16 meters in 6 seconds, hence the slope m is given as follows:

m = -16/6 = 2.67 m/s.

As the slope is constant, a linear function can model the situation.

Read more about linear functions here:

https://brainly.com/question/15602982

#SPJ1

The drone in the Example hovers at 16 meters for a few minutes before being

lowered at a constant rate. It reaches the ground after 6 seconds.

a. Why can the drone's descent be modeled by a linear function?

The graph of the linear equation y = (1/4)*x - 1 is on the image at the end.

To graph the line, we need to find two points that belong to the line, and then we can connect them with a line.

So let's evaluate the linear equation.

if x = 0

y = (1/4)*0 - 1 = -1

We have the point (0, -1)

Now let's get another point:

if x = 4

y = (1/4)*4 - 1 = 4 - 1 = 3

We have the point (4, 3)

Now graph these two points and draw a line that connects them.

Learn more about linear equations:

https://brainly.com/question/1884491

#SPJ1

Yes, three-dimensional shapes, including polyhedra, have surface area. A polyhedron is a solid figure formed by flat faces, which are typically polygons, such as triangles, squares, or other multi-sided shapes. The surface area of a polyhedron is the total area of all its faces.

To find the surface area of a polyhedron, you must calculate the area of each individual face and then sum up these areas. The process varies depending on the type of polyhedron. For example, to find the surface area of a cube, you would calculate the area of one square face (side length squared) and multiply it by the number of faces (6). For a rectangular prism, you would calculate the area of each rectangular face and then add them together.

Other types of polyhedra, such as tetrahedrons or octahedrons, have different methods for calculating surface area, but the principle remains the same: find the area of each face and sum them up. Understanding the surface area of a polyhedron is important in many real-world applications, including architecture, engineering, and design, as it can be used to determine the amount of material needed for construction or the amount of paint required to cover a structure.

To learn more about surface area : brainly.com/question/29298005

#SPJ11

Answer:

Of the options provided, only one sentence uses the word "determined" correctly:

She determined her height by using a tape measure.

The other sentences contain incorrect or confusing uses of the word "determined". Here is the analysis:

They listened carefully while the teacher determined the

assignment.

"Determined" should be "gave" or "assigned" the homework. Determined does not make sense here.

He explained the rules to his friend before they determined

the game.

"Determined" should be "decided on" or "chose" the game. Determined is the wrong word choice.

She determined her sister to try a new sport at school.

"Determined" cannot be used as a verb followed by a direct object ("her sister") in this way. This sentence is grammatically incorrect.

The correct option is:

She determined her height by using a tape measure.

Here, "determined" is used properly as a verb meaning "ascertained" or " figured out" something (her height) by some specified method (using a tape measure).

Step-by-step explanation:

It will take about 34.71 years for the account balance to double, assuming that interest is compounded monthly and that there are no further deposits or withdrawals.

We can use the formula for compound interest to solve this problem:

A = P(1 + r/n[tex])^{nt}[/tex]

where A is the ending balance, P is the principal (initial deposit), r is the interest rate (as a decimal), n is the number of times the interest is compounded per year, and t is the number of years.

In this case, we have P = $2,500, r = 0.02 (2% expressed as a decimal), n = 12 (monthly compounding), and we want to find t such that A = 2P = $5,000 (double the initial deposit).

Substituting these values into the formula, we get:

$5,000 = $2,500(1 + 0.02/12)^(12t)

Dividing both sides by $2,500 and simplifying the right-hand side, we get:

2 = (1 + 0.02/12)^(12t)

Taking the natural logarithm of both sides, we get:

ln(2) = 12t ln(1 + 0.02/12)

Dividing both sides by 12 ln(1 + 0.02/12) and simplifying, we get:

t = ln(2) / (12 ln(1 + 0.02/12)) ≈ 34.71

To learn more about continuous compound interest;

https://brainly.com/question/18722165

#SPJ4

Standard deviation of the sample of seven infants is 3.48 pounds approximately.

Given the observations are:

19.1, 22.1, 23.1, 25.1, 22.1, 29.1, and 29.1

Total number of observations = 7

Total of observations = 19.1 + 22.1 + 23.1  + 25.1 + 22.1 + 29.1 + 29.1 = 169.7

The mean of the data set (m) = (Total of observations)/(Number of observation) = 169.7/7 = 24.2 pounds (Rounding off to nearest tenth)

Now the standard deviation of the data set is given by,

= √((1/7)*{(19.1 - 24.2)² + (22.1 - 24.2)² + (23.1 - 24.2)² + (25.1 - 24.2)² + (22.1 - 24.2)² + (29.1 - 24.2)² + (29.1 - 24.2)²})

= √((1/7)*84.87)

= √12.1

= 3.48 pounds.

Hence, standard deviation = 3.48 pounds.

To know more about Standard deviation here

https://brainly.com/question/24298037

#SPJ4

The equation is inconsistent, which means there is no valid solution for the average number of comic books (A). As a result, we cannot determine the number of comic books Patrick has based on the given information.

Let's denote the average number of comic books as "A".

Given that Sid has 19 comic books, we can use this information to determine the average number of comic books between Marvin and Patrick.

The total number of comic books among the three of them is:

19 (Sid's books) + A (Marvin's books) + A (Patrick's books)

According to the given information:

Marvin's number of comic books is 10 less than the average, which means Marvin has A - 10 books.

Patrick's number of comic books is 12 more than the average, which means Patrick has A + 12 books.

So, the total number of comic books among the three of them can be expressed as:

19 + (A - 10) + (A + 12)

Simplifying the expression:

2A + 1

Since we know the total number of comic books is the sum of the individual numbers, we have:

19 + (A - 10) + (A + 12) = 2A + 1

Simplifying further:

2A + 21 = 2A + 1

By subtracting 2A from both sides of the equation, we get:

21 = 1

Know more about average number here:

https://brainly.com/question/16956746

#SPJ11

a) Zachary used random sampling to gather his data.

b) the percentage of red form each 5 sample are given as follows;

c) from the results in B we can state that 2 of the sample, red cars made up 10% of the observation, in another 2 sample, it was 15%. The sample with the highest observation of red cards is sample 2.

In statistics, a simple random sample is a subset of individuals picked at random from a larger collection, with all individuals having the same probability. It is the process of picking a sample at random.

Random sampling guarantees that the findings received from your sample are close to those obtained if the full population was surveyed.

See the attached table for the calculation.

Learn more about random sampling:
https://brainly.com/question/31523301
#SPJ1

The number of miles that can be driven if you have at most $170 to spend for weekly transportation is 500 miles or less.

Let's assume the number of miles driven in a week is represented by the variable 'm'.

The total cost of renting the car for a week, including the mileage charges, can be calculated using the given information. The cost for renting the car for a week is $70, and the additional cost per mile is $0.20.

So, the total cost C in dollars for a week can be expressed as:

C = 70 + 0.20m

We know that the maximum amount to spend for weekly transportation is $170. Therefore, we can set up the inequality:

C ≤ 170

Substituting the expression for C, we have:

70 + 0.20m ≤ 170

To solve for 'm', we can first subtract 70 from both sides of the inequality:

0.20m ≤ 100

Next, we divide both sides of the inequality by 0.20 to isolate 'm':

m ≤ 100 / 0.20

Simplifying the right side of the inequality, we have:

m ≤ 500

Know more about inequality here:

https://brainly.com/question/30231190

#SPJ11

The calculated value of the volume of the prism is 120 cubic cm

From the question, we have the following parameters that can be used in our computation:

The triangular based prism

By formula, we have the volume of the prism to be

Volume = base area  * Height

using the above as a guide, we have the following:

Base area = 1/2 * 4 * 5 = 10

Height = 12

substitute the known values in the above equation, so, we have the following representation

Volume = 10 * 12

Evaluate

Volume = 120

Hence, the volume of the prism is 120 cubic cm

Read more about volume at

brainly.com/question/463363

#SPJ1

It is not necessarily true that n(A - B) = n(A) - n(B) when A and B are sets.

Consider two sets, A = {1, 2, 3} and B = {1, 4}.

In this case, A - B = {2, 3}, n(A) = 3, n(B) = 2, and n(A - B) = 2. Therefore, n(A - B) ≠ n(A) - n(B).

In set theory, the difference of two sets A and B is defined as the set of elements in A that are not in B. The cardinality of a set is the number of elements it contains.

The equation n(A - B) = n(A) - n(B) is not always true, and there exist counterexamples where it does not hold. One such counterexample is A = {1, 2, 3} and B = {1, 4}. In this case, A - B = {2, 3}, n(A) = 3, n(B) = 2, and n(A - B) = 2. Thus, n(A - B) ≠ n(A) - n(B).

It is important to note that the equation n(A - B) = n(A) - n(B) holds only when every element in A - B is also in A and not in B. If this condition is not met, the equation does not hold.

Therefore, one must be cautious when applying this equation and ensure that all elements are properly accounted for.

Learn more about Set theory

brainly.com/question/27333813

#SPJ11

Factor analysis, when originally developed, was assumed to be used to explore data to generate hypotheses and reveal underlying patterns or latent variables. This statistical technique is employed for reducing a large number of observed variables into a smaller set of factors, while retaining as much information as possible.

Factor analysis has two primary types: exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). EFA is utilized to identify the potential structure and relationships among variables without imposing any preconceived notions. It seeks to uncover hidden dimensions or factors that might explain the correlations among the variables.

CFA, on the other hand, tests a predetermined factor structure based on prior research or theoretical assumptions. It examines whether the data fits the proposed model, allowing researchers to confirm or reject their hypotheses.

Overall, factor analysis has become a valuable tool in various fields, including psychology, sociology, and economics. By unveiling underlying factors, researchers can better understand complex data sets and draw more accurate conclusions from their studies.

To learn more about exploratory factor analysis : brainly.com/question/30974361

#SPJ11

The equation of the line in point slope form is y + 4 = 4(x + 3).

Equation of line can be represented in point slope form as follows:

y - y₁ = m(x - x₁)

where

The slope of a line is the change in the dependent variable with respect to the change in the independent variable.

Therefore,

m = 4

using (-3, -4)

Hence,

y + 4 = 4(x + 3)

learn more on point slope form here: https://brainly.com/question/29054476

#SPJ1

Quicksort is a popular sorting algorithm that works by partitioning the array into two sub-arrays, one with elements smaller than a chosen pivot element, and the other with elements greater than the pivot. It then recursively sorts these sub-arrays until the entire array is sorted.

To sort the given numbers using quicksort, we can start by choosing the last element, 28, as the pivot. We then partition the array as follows:

23, 20, 28, 34, 35, 43, 53, 87, 75, 94, 96, 75, 94

In this partition, all elements before 28 are smaller and all elements after 28 are greater. We then recursively apply quicksort to the left and right sub-arrays until the entire array is sorted.

For the left sub-array (23, 20, 28, 34, 35, 43, 53), we choose the last element, 53, as the pivot and partition as follows:

23, 20, 28, 34, 35, 43, 53

We then recursively apply quicksort to the left and right sub-arrays until the left sub-array contains only one element, at which point it is considered sorted. We then move on to the right sub-array (87, 75, 94, 96, 75, 94) and repeat the process.

The right sub-array can be partitioned using any element as the pivot, but we will choose the last element, 94. The partition is as follows:

75, 87, 75, 94, 94, 96

We then recursively apply quicksort to the left and right sub-arrays until they are sorted. Once both sub-arrays are sorted, we can combine them to get the final sorted array:

20, 23, 28, 34, 35, 43, 53, 75, 75, 87, 94, 94, 96

In summary, to sort the given numbers using quicksort, we choose a pivot, partition the array into two sub-arrays, and recursively apply quicksort to each sub-array until the entire array is sorted.

To learn more about quicksort : brainly.com/question/17143249

#SPJ11

The equation that can be used to find the cost, c, of x pounds of tomatoes is: c = 1.59x

The given information is that the cost of tomatoes is proportional to the amount of tomatoes purchased. This means that the cost will increase or decrease in proportion to the amount of tomatoes purchased. If tomatoes cost $1.59 per pound, we can use this information to write an equation that represents the relationship between the cost and the amount of tomatoes purchased. We use the variable x to represent the amount of tomatoes in pounds, and multiply it by the cost per pound of tomatoes, which is $1.59. Therefore, the equation that can be used to find the cost, c, of x pounds of tomatoes is c = 1.59x.

brainly.com/question/30675547

Learn more about proportional

#SPJ11

Answer:

x = 122°

Step-by-step explanation:

There is remote angle( non- adjecent angle) and their sum equal to the exterior angle .

Exterior angle is an angle formed from one side of the polygone and the extended side so

<A and <B are remot angle and <BCD is exterior angle .

And we write the equetion as

<A + <B = <BCD

58° + 64° = x°

122° = X°

so the exterior angle ( x ) measures 122° .

The length of JH in the similar triangle is 35.7 units.

Similar triangles are the triangles that have corresponding sides in proportion to each other and corresponding angles equal to each other.

Therefore, Triangle EFG is similar to triangle HIJ. The measure of side JH can be found as follows:

Using the proportions,

7 / 25 = 10 / JH

cross multiply

7JH = 25 × 10

7JH = 250

divide both sides by 7

JH = 250 / 7

JH = 35.7142857143

Therefore,

JH = 35.7 units

learn more on similar triangles here: https://brainly.com/question/29412503

#SPJ1