Urgent please help!!

If the number of years that a computer lasts has density f(x) = { s 8x if x > 2 otherwise. 0, then (a) the probability that the computer lasts between 3 and 5 years is 64, (b) the probability that the computer lasts at least 4 years is 1 (or 100%), (c) the probability that the computer lasts less than 1 year is 4, (d) the probability that the computer lasts exactly 2.48 years is 0., and (e) the number of years that the computer lasts is undefined.

To find the probabilities and expected value, we need to integrate the given density function over the respective intervals. Let's calculate each part step by step:

a) Probability that the computer lasts between 3 and 5 years:

To find this probability, we need to integrate the density function f(x) over the interval [3, 5]:

P(3 ≤ x ≤ 5) = ∫[3,5] f(x) dx

Since the density function f(x) is defined piecewise, we need to split the integral into two parts:

P(3 ≤ x ≤ 5) = ∫[3,5] f(x) dx

= ∫[3,5] 8x dx (for x > 2)

= ∫[3,5] 8x dx

= [4x^2]3^5

= 4(5^2) - 4(3^2)

= 4(25) - 4(9)

= 100 - 36

= 64

Therefore, the probability that the computer lasts between 3 and 5 years is 64.

b) Probability that the computer lasts at least 4 years:

To find this probability, we need to integrate the density function f(x) over the interval [4, ∞):

P(x ≥ 4) = ∫[4,∞) f(x) dx

Since the density function f(x) is defined piecewise, we need to split the integral into two parts:

P(x ≥ 4) = ∫[4,∞) f(x) dx

= ∫[4,∞) 8x dx (for x > 2)

= ∫[4,∞) 8x dx

= [4x^2]4^∞

= ∞ - 4(4^2)

= ∞ - 4(16)

= ∞ - 64

= ∞

Therefore, the probability that the computer lasts at least 4 years is 1 (or 100%).

c) Probability that the computer lasts less than 1 year:

To find this probability, we need to integrate the density function f(x) over the interval [0, 1]:

P(x < 1) = ∫[0,1] f(x) dx

Since the density function f(x) is defined piecewise, we need to split the integral into two parts:

P(x < 1) = ∫[0,1] f(x) dx

= ∫[0,1] 8x dx (for x > 2)

= ∫[0,1] 8x dx

= [4x^2]0^1

= 4(1^2) - 4(0^2)

= 4(1) - 4(0)

= 4 - 0

= 4

Therefore, the probability that the computer lasts less than 1 year is 4.

d) Probability that the computer lasts exactly 2.48 years:

Since the density function f(x) is defined piecewise, we need to check whether 2.48 falls into the range where f(x) is nonzero. In this case, it does not since 2.48 ≤ 2. Therefore, the probability that the computer lasts exactly 2.48 years is 0.

e) Expected value of the number of years that the computer lasts:

The expected value, E(X), can be calculated using the formula:

E(X) = ∫(-∞,∞) x * f(x) dx

For the given density function f(x), we can split the integral into two parts:

E(X) = ∫[2,∞) x * f(x) dx + ∫(-∞,2] x * f(x) dx

First, let's calculate ∫[2,∞) x * f(x) dx:

∫[2,∞) x * f(x) dx = ∫[2,∞) x * (8x) dx (for x > 2)

= ∫[2,∞) 8x^2 dx

= [8(1/3)x^3]2^∞

= lim(x→∞) [8(1/3)x^3] - (8(1/3)(2^3))

= lim(x→∞) (8/3)x^3 - 64/3

= ∞ - 64/3

= ∞

Next, let's calculate ∫(-∞,2] x * f(x) dx:

∫(-∞,2] x * f(x) dx = ∫(-∞,2] x * (s) dx (for x ≤ 2)

= 0 (since f(x) = 0 for x ≤ 2)

Therefore, the expected value of the number of years that the computer lasts is undefined (or infinite) in this case.

Learn more about density function:

https://brainly.com/question/30403935

#SPJ11

The total area of the window is 1824 square inches

From the question, we have the following parameters that can be used in our computation:

The composite figure that represents the window

The total area of the window is the sum of the individual shapes

So, we have

Surface area = 48 * 32 + 1/2 * 48 * 12

Evaluate

Surface area = 1824

Hence. the total area of the window is 1824 square inches

Read more about area at

brainly.com/question/26403859

#SPJ1

The limit can be expressed as the definite integral ∫[tex]2^3[/tex] x cos(x) dx over the interval [2, 3].

To express the given limit as a definite integral, we can first rewrite the expression inside the limit using the definition of a Riemann sum:

n cos(xi) xi δx = Σi=1n cos(xi) xi Δx

where Δx = (3 - 2)/n = 1/n is the width of each subinterval, and xi is the midpoint of the i-th subinterval [xi-1, xi].

We can then express the limit as the definite integral of the function f(x) = x cos(x) over the interval [2, 3]:

lim n→∞ Σi=1n cos(xi) xi Δx = ∫[tex]2^3[/tex] x cos(x) dx

Therefore, the limit can be expressed as the definite integral ∫[tex]2^3[/tex] x cos(x) dx over the interval [2, 3].

for such more question on integral

https://brainly.com/question/27746495

#SPJ11

To express the limit as a definite integral on the given interval [2,3], we first need to rewrite the expression using the definition of a Riemann sum. Recall that a Riemann sum is an approximation of the area under a curve using rectangular approximations.

Given the limit:

lim (n→∞) Σ [n * cos(x_i) * x_i * Δx], i=1 to n, with interval [2, 3]

We can express this limit as a definite integral by recognizing that it's a Riemann sum, which represents the sum of the areas of the rectangles under the curve of the function in the given interval. In this case, the function is f(x) = x * cos(x). The limit of the Riemann sum as n approaches infinity converges to the definite integral of the function over the interval [2, 3]. Therefore, we can write:

lim (n→∞) Σ [n * cos(x_i) * x_i * Δx] = ∫[2, 3] x * cos(x) dx

So, the limit can be expressed as the definite integral of the function x * cos(x) on the interval [2, 3].

To learn more about Riemann sum click here: brainly.com/question/30404402

#SPJ11

The least squares estimate of the slope is 0.7.

To estimate the slope of the regression line, we use the least squares method. This involves finding the line that minimizes the sum of the squared errors (SSE) between the predicted values of y and the actual values of y, for all values of x. The total sum of squares (SST) is also calculated, which represents the total variation in y from the mean value of y.

Using the given data, we can calculate the slope of the regression line as follows:

One way to do this is to recognize that the slope is related to the ratio of SSE to SST. Specifically, the coefficient of determination, denoted by R², is defined as the ratio of the explained variance to the total variance. This can be calculated as:

R² = 1 - (SSE/SST)

We are given the values of SSE and SST, so we can calculate R² as follows:

R² = 1 - (1.9/6.8) = 0.7206

The coefficient of determination represents the proportion of the variation in y that is explained by the variation in x. It is a measure of the goodness of fit of the regression line.

Since we know the value of R², we can estimate the slope using the fact that:

R² = b₁² * Σ(x-x)² / Σ(y-y)²

Solving for b₁, we get:

b₁ = √(R² * Σ(y-y)² / Σ(x-x)²) = √(0.7206 * 4.5 / 10) = 0.7

Hence the correct option is (a).

To know more about slope here

https://brainly.com/question/29139086

#SPJ4

Complete Question:

The following information regarding a dependent variable (y) and an independent variable (x) is provided.

y  6 7 6 8 9  

x   2 3 4 5 6

SSE = 1.9

SST = 6.8

What is the least squares estimate of the slope?

a) 0.7

b) 4

c) 4.4

d) 7.2

Answer:

------------------------

Slope-intercept form is:

Convert the given equation:

The expression as given above: "−c f(x, y) ds = − c f(x, y) ds" seems to be true.

Both expressions, the left-hand side, −c f(x, y) ds and the right-hand side, − c f(x, y) ds:

represent the same mathematical operation. The mathematical equation represented here is obtained by multiplying the function f(x, y) by a constant -c and integrating it with respect to the variable ds. The placement of the constant -c does not affect the result, so the two expressions are equivalent.

Thus, both expressions (right-hand and left-hand sides) are the same. Hence, the statement is true.

Learn more about mathematical operation: https://brainly.com/question/4721701

#SPJ11

The decimal value of -1/13 is a repeating decimal. Hence, Chris is Incorrect.

A decimal is termed as repeating if the values after the decimal point fails to terminate and continues indefinitely.

Obtaining the decimal representation of -1/13 using division, we have;

-1 ÷ 13 ≈ -0.07692307692...

As we can see, the decimal digits "076923" repeat indefinitely. This repeating pattern depicts that the decimal value -1/13 is a repeating decimal.

Therefore, the decimal value of -1/13 is a repeating decimal.

Learn more on repeating decimal :https://brainly.com/question/16727802

#SPJ1

Ricardo has the greatest amount of personal control over his savings. So, correct option is A.

Savings refer to the money he has already set aside or accumulated for college. He has complete control over how much he saves and how he spends it.

Scholarships, grants, and work-study programs are external sources of funding that Ricardo can apply for and receive, but he may not have complete control over the amount of money he receives.

Scholarships and grants are typically awarded based on academic achievement, financial need, or other criteria that are beyond his control. Work-study programs may limit the number of hours he can work or the type of work he can do, and the amount of money he can earn may also be limited.

In contrast, Ricardo can decide how much money he wants to save for college and how he wants to allocate that money towards his expenses. He can also choose to invest his savings in a way that can earn interest or returns, which can help him maximize his savings. Therefore, his personal control over his savings gives him the most flexibility and independence in paying for his college expenses.

So, correct option is A.

To learn more about funding click on,

https://brainly.com/question/27195228

#SPJ1

To change from rectangular to cylindrical coordinates, we use the following formulas: r = √(x²+ y²) and theta = arctan(y/x). For part (a), the coordinates are (-8, 8, 8). Using the formulas, we get r = √((-8)² + 8²) = 8√(2) and theta = arctan(8/-8) + pi = -3pi/4. Therefore, the cylindrical coordinates are (8√(2), -3π/4, 8). For part (b), the coordinates are (-4, 4√(3), 9). Using the formulas, we get r = √((-4)²+ (4sqrt(3))²) = 8 and theta = arctan(4√(3)/-4) + π = -π/3. Therefore, the cylindrical coordinates are (8, -π/3, 9).

Rectangular coordinates are used to represent a point in three-dimensional space as an ordered triplet (x,y,z). However, cylindrical coordinates are an alternative way to represent this point using the distance r from the origin to the point in the xy-plane, the angle theta between the positive x-axis and the projection of the point onto the xy-plane, and the height z of the point above the xy-plane. The formulas for converting between rectangular and cylindrical coordinates involve using trigonometric functions.

Changing from rectangular to cylindrical coordinates involves using the formulas r = √(x²+ y²) and theta = arctan(y/x) to find the distance from the origin to the point in the xy-plane and the angle between the positive x-axis and the projection of the point onto the xy-plane, respectively. The height of the point above the xy-plane remains the same.

To know more about rectangular and cylindrical coordinates visit:

https://brainly.com/question/14641711

#SPJ11

To compute the Riemann sum of f(x) = 4x^2 + 4 over the interval [0, 4] using 4 subintervals and choosing the left endpoints as representative points, we need to calculate the sum of the areas of rectangles formed by the function and the subintervals.

The width of each subinterval, Δx, is given by (4 - 0) / 4 = 1.

The left endpoints of the subintervals are 0, 1, 2, and 3.

Now, we evaluate the function at each left endpoint and multiply it by the width Δx to get the area of each rectangle:

f(0) = 4(0)^2 + 4 = 4

f(1) = 4(1)^2 + 4 = 8

f(2) = 4(2)^2 + 4 = 20

f(3) = 4(3)^2 + 4 = 40

The Riemann sum is the sum of the areas of these rectangles:

Riemann sum = Δx * [f(0) + f(1) + f(2) + f(3)]

= 1 * (4 + 8 + 20 + 40)

= 72

Therefore, the Riemann sum of f(x) over the interval [0, 4] using 4 subintervals and choosing the left endpoints as representative points is 72.

Therefore, the answer is (b) 72.

Learn more about Riemann sum here: brainly.com/question/32388477

#SPJ11

It will take approximately 4.02 years for the tube to have 200 million bacteria.

The exponential growth formula can be used to determine how long it will take for the tube to contain 200 million bacteria:

N = N₀ (1 + r)ⁿ

Where:

N is the final population size (200 million bacteria)

N₀ is the initial population size (50 million bacteria)

r is the growth rate (27% or 0.27)

n is the time in years

Putting the values,

200,000,000 = 50,000,000 (1 + 0.27)ⁿ

4 = (1 + 0.27)ⁿ

Taking the logarithm of both sides, we have:

log(4) = log((1 + 0.27)ⁿ)

n = log(4) / log(1 + 0.27)

n ≈ 4.02

Therefore, it will take approximately 4.02 years for the tube to have 200 million bacteria.

Learn more about exponential growth click;

https://brainly.com/question/1596693

#SPJ1

The relation r on a is an equivalence relation.

To show that the relation r defined on a, where a = z × z, is an equivalence relation, we need to demonstrate three properties: reflexivity, symmetry, and transitivity.

1. Reflexivity: For all (a, b) in a, (a, b) r (a, b).

This means that for any complex number (a, b), we have a * b = a * b, which is true. Therefore, the relation is reflexive.

2. Symmetry: For all (a, b) and (c, d) in a, if (a, b) r (c, d), then (c, d) r (a, b).

Suppose (a, b) r (c, d), which means a * d = c * b. We need to show that (c, d) r (a, b), i.e., c * b = a * d.

By symmetry, the equality a * d = c * b holds, and we can rearrange it to obtain c * b = a * d. Thus, the relation is symmetric.

3. Transitivity: For all (a, b), (c, d), and (e, f) in a, if (a, b) r (c, d) and (c, d) r (e, f), then (a, b) r (e, f).

Since the relation r on a satisfies all three properties of reflexivity, symmetry, and transitivity, it is an equivalence relation.

In summary, the relation r defined on a, where a = z × z, is an equivalence relation.

To learn more about equivalence relation, click here: brainly.com/question/31309403

#SPJ11

Answer:

[tex][-1,7][/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

From the figure, we observe that the y-coordinate of the circle's center is [tex]y_{c}=3[/tex] units while its radius is [tex]r=4[/tex] units.

So, the range of the circle is [tex][y_{c}-r, y_{c}+r]=[3-4,3+4]=[-1,7][/tex]

Answer: 19/36

Step-by-step explanation:

The approximation for f(10) using the line tangent to the graph of f at the point (8, 2) is 22.73.

To explain this, we can use the concept of the tangent line approximation. The tangent line to the graph of f at the point (8, 2) represents the best linear approximation to the function near that point. The slope of the tangent line can be found by taking the derivative of f at x = 8.

Differentiating f(x) = x√3 with respect to x gives us f'(x) = √3. Evaluating f'(8), we find that the slope of the tangent line is √3.

Using the point-slope form of a linear equation, the equation of the tangent line is y - 2 = √3(x - 8).

To approximate f(10), we substitute x = 10 into the equation of the tangent line:

y - 2 = √3(10 - 8)

y - 2 = 2√3

y ≈ 2 + 2√3 ≈ 5.46

Therefore, the approximation for f(10) using the line tangent to the graph of f at the point (8, 2) is approximately 22.73.

To learn more about tangent click here, brainly.com/question/10053881

#SPJ11

If one hundred 98% confidence intervals are constructed for a population parameter, we would expect approximately 98 of the intervals to capture the unknown parameter.

In a 98% confidence interval, there is a 98% probability that the true population parameter lies within the interval. This means that if we were to construct 100 such intervals, we would expect about 98 of them to contain the true population parameter, and the remaining 2 intervals would not capture the unknown parameter. However, it's important to note that the actual number of intervals that capture the parameter may vary due to random sampling variability.

Learn more about confidence intervals here:

https://brainly.com/question/33920540

#SPJ12

The statement you made is not entirely correct. The Second Shape Theorem, also known as the Second Derivative Test, does not include the converse of the First Shape Theorem. Instead, it provides additional information about the nature of critical points of a function.

The Second Shape Theorem states that if a function f(x) has a critical point at x = a (i.e., f'(a) = 0), and if f''(a) exists and is nonzero, then the function has a local minimum at x = a if f''(a) > 0, and a local maximum at x = a if f''(a) < 0.

Note that this theorem only applies to critical points where f'(a) = 0. There may be other critical points where f'(a) does not equal zero, and these points do not satisfy the conditions of the Second Shape Theorem.

In contrast, the converse of the First Shape Theorem states that if a function is differentiable at a point x = a and f'(a) = 0, then f has an extreme value at x = a. This is a separate theorem that is not directly related to the Second Shape Theorem.

for such more question on  First Shape Theorem.

https://brainly.com/question/30329627

#SPJ11

The Second Shape Theorem states that if a function f(x) has an extreme value at x=a, then the function must also be differentiable at x=a. This theorem is the converse of the First Shape Theorem, which states that if a function is differentiable at a point, then it must have a local extreme value at that point.

Essentially, the Second Shape Theorem tells us that having an extreme value at a point is a necessary condition for differentiability at that point. This theorem is particularly useful in calculus and optimization problems, where we are interested in finding the maximum or minimum values of a function. By checking for extreme values and differentiability at those points, we can determine if a function has a local maximum or minimum.

Your statement, "If f(x) has an extreme value at x=a, then f is differentiable at x=a," is actually the converse of the First Shape Theorem. However, this statement is not universally true, as extreme values can occur at non-differentiable points (e.g., sharp corners or endpoints). The Second Shape Theorem does not include the converse of the First Shape Theorem, but rather provides another method for identifying extreme values by analyzing the second derivative.

Learn more about theorem here : brainly.com/question/30066983

#SPJ11

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

To simplify the fraction (−4c^−1)^3 / (12c^−8), we can apply the rules of exponents.

First, let's simplify the numerator: (-4c^(-1))^3. To raise a power to a power, we multiply the exponents, so we have:

(-4c^(-1))^3 = (-4)^3 * (c^(-1))^3

= -64 * c^(-3)

Now, let's simplify the denominator: 12c^(-8).

Putting the simplified numerator and denominator together, the fraction becomes:

(-64 * c^(-3)) / (12c^(-8))

To simplify further, we can divide the coefficients and subtract the exponents of the variable:

(-64 / 12) * (c^(-3 - (-8)))

= (-64 / 12) * (c^5)

= -16/3 * c^5

So, the fraction (−4c^−1)^3 / (12c^−8) simplifies to (-16/3) * c^5.

Answer:

  D) 12.4

Step-by-step explanation:

You want the adjacent leg to an angle of 39° in a right triangle with hypotenuse 16.

The relation between the side adjacent to the angle, and the hypotenuse, is ...

  Cos = Adjacent/Hypotenuse

Multiplying by the hypotenuse gives ...

  hypotenuse · cos = adjacent

  16·cos(39°) = x

  12.4 = x

__

Additional comment

Perhaps your teacher is confused. Choice A is correct if the positions of x and 16 are swapped in the figure.

The leg length (x) cannot be greater than the hypotenuse (16), so choices A and C can be eliminated immediately. Answer choice B corresponds to an angle of 33.1°, which is nowhere to be found in this figure.

<95141404393>

The total distance the particle has traveled up to time t=3 is 4/3 units.

To determine whether the particle is moving to the right or left at time t=0, we can find the velocity of the particle at that time by taking the derivative of x(t) with respect to t:

x'(t) = t^2 - 6t + 8

Substituting t=0, we get:

x'(0) = 0^2 - 6(0) + 8 = 8

Since the velocity is positive at t=0, the particle is moving to the right.To find the values of t for which the particle is moving to the left, we need to find when the velocity is negative:

t^2 - 6t + 8 < 0

Solving for t using the quadratic formula, we get:

t < 2 or t > 4

Therefore, the particle is moving to the left when t is between 0 and 2, and when t is greater than 4.To find the position of the particle at time t=3, we can simply substitute t=3 into the original position equation:

x(3) = (1/3)(3^3) - 3(3^2) + 8(3) = 1

So the particle is at position x=1 when t=3.To find the total distance the particle has traveled up to time t=3, we need to integrate the absolute value of the velocity function from 0 to 3:

∫|t^2 - 6t + 8| dt from 0 to 3

This integral can be split into two parts, one from 0 to 2 and one from 2 to 3, where the integrand changes sign. Then we can integrate each part separately:

∫(6t - t^2 + 8) dt from 0 to 2 - ∫(6t - t^2 + 8) dt from 2 to 3= [(3t^2 - t^3 + 8t) / 3] from 0 to 2 - [(3t^2 - t^3 + 8t) / 3] from 2 to 3= [(12/3) - (16/3)] - [(27/3) - (26/3) + (24/3) - (8/3)]= 2/3 + 2/3 = 4/3.

For such more questions on Distance:

https://brainly.com/question/28551043

#SPJ11

At time t = 0, the velocity of the particle is given by the derivative of x(t) with respect to t evaluated at t = 0. Differentiating x(t) with respect to t, we get:

x'(t) = t^2 - 6t + 8

Evaluating x'(t) at t = 0, we get:

x'(0) = 0^2 - 6(0) + 8 = 8

Since the velocity is positive, the particle is moving to the right at time t = 0.

To find the values of t for which the particle is moving to the left, we need to find the values of t for which the velocity is negative. Solving the inequality x'(t) < 0, we get:

(t - 2)(t - 4) < 0

This inequality is satisfied when 2 < t < 4. Therefore, the particle is moving to the left when 2 < t < 4.

To find the position of the particle at time t = 3, we simply evaluate x(3):

x(3) = (1/3)3^3 - 3(3^2) + 8(3) = 1

When t = 3, the particle has traveled a total distance equal to the absolute value of the change in its position over the interval [0,3], which is:

|x(3) - x(0)| = |1 - 0| = 1

Supporting Answer:

To determine whether the particle is moving to the right or left at time t = 0, we need to find the velocity of the particle at that time. The velocity of the particle is given by the derivative of its position with respect to time. So, we differentiate x(t) with respect to t and evaluate the result at t = 0 to find the velocity at that time. If the velocity is positive, the particle is moving to the right, and if it is negative, the particle is moving to the left.

To find the values of t for which the particle is moving to the left, we need to solve the inequality x'(t) < 0, where x'(t) is the velocity of the particle. Since x'(t) is a quadratic function of t, we can factor it to find its roots, which are the values of t at which the velocity is zero. Then, we can test the sign of x'(t) in the intervals between the roots to find when the velocity is negative and hence, the particle is moving to the left.

To find the position of the particle at time t = 3, we simply evaluate x(t) at t = 3. This gives us the position of the particle at that time.

To find the total distance traveled by the particle when t = 3, we need to find the absolute value of the change in its position over the interval [0,3]. Since the particle is moving to the right at time t = 0, its position is increasing, so we subtract its initial position from its position at t = 3 to find the distance traveled. If the particle were moving to the left at time t = 0, we would add the initial position to the position at t = 3 instead.

Know more about velocity here:

https://brainly.com/question/17127206

#SPJ11

Using Euler's method with Δt = 0.7, the approximate values for y1 and y2 are 0.556 and 0.340, respectively.

To approximate the values of y1 and y2 using Euler's method, we start with the initial condition y(0) = 0.8 and use the given differential equation dy/dt = (y - 1)(1 - t^2) with a step size of Δt = 0.7.

Approximate y1:

Using Euler's method, we compute y1 as follows:

y1 = y0 + Δt * (y0 - 1) * (1 - t0^2) = 0.8 + 0.7 * (0.8 - 1) * (1 - 0^2) = 0.556

Approximate y2:

Using Euler's method again, we calculate y2 as follows:

y2 = y1 + Δt * (y1 - 1) * (1 - t1^2) = 0.556 + 0.7 * (0.556 - 1) * (1 - 0.7^2) = 0.340

Therefore, the approximate value of y2 is 0.340.

Learn more about Euler's method

brainly.com/question/30699690

#SPJ11

The integral of the function f(x) = x sec^2(t) dt/4 is given by F(x) = (x/4)tan(t) + C, where C is the constant of integration.

To find the integral of f(x), we can apply the integration rules. First, we rewrite the function as [tex]f(x) = (x/4)sec^2(t)[/tex]. We can pull out the constant factor of x/4 from the integral. Therefore, the integral becomes (1/4) x ∫ sec²(t) dt.

The integral of [tex]sec^2(t)[/tex] with respect to t is tan(t), so the integral becomes (1/4) x tan(t) + C, where C is the constant of integration. Now, we have the antiderivative of f(x).

Since the original function had a variable t, the resulting antiderivative also contains t. We haven't been given any specific limits for the integration, so the solution is expressed in terms of t. If specific limits were provided, we could evaluate the definite integral and obtain a numerical value.

In summary, the integral of [tex]f(x) = x sec^2(t) dt/4[/tex] is [tex]F(x) = (x/4)tan(t) + C[/tex], where C represents the constant of integration.

Learn more about antiderivative here: https://brainly.com/question/28208942

#SPJ11

The CDF of Y evaluated at y = 0.72 is 0.1296.

Since X1 and X2 are independent and uniformly distributed over [0, 2], their joint density function is:

f(x1, x2) = 1/4, for 0 ≤ x1 ≤ 2 and 0 ≤ x2 ≤ 2

To find the CDF of Y, we can use the fact that:

Fy(y) = P(Y ≤ y) = P(max(X1, X2) ≤ y)

This event can be split into two cases:

X1 and X2 are both less than or equal to y:

In this case, Y will be less than or equal to y.

The probability of this occurring can be calculated using the joint density function:

P(X1 ≤ y, X2 ≤ y) = ∫0y ∫0y f(x1, x2) dx1 dx2

= ∫0y ∫0y 1/4 dx1 dx2

[tex]= (y/2)^2[/tex]

[tex]= y^2/4[/tex]

One of X1 or X2 is greater than y:

In this case, Y will be equal to the maximum of X1 and X2.

The probability of this occurring can be calculated as the complement of the probability that both X1 and X2 are less than or equal to y:

P(X1 > y or X2 > y) = 1 - P(X1 ≤ y, X2 ≤ y)

[tex]= 1 - y^2/4[/tex]

Therefore, the CDF of Y is:

Fy(y) = P(Y ≤ y) = P(max(X1, X2) ≤ y)

= P(X1 ≤ y, X2 ≤ y) + P(X1 > y or X2 > y)

[tex]= y^2/4 + 1 - y^2/4[/tex]

= 1, for y ≥ 2

[tex]= y^2/4,[/tex]for 0 ≤ y ≤ 2

To find Fy(0.72), we simply substitute y = 0.72 into the expression for Fy(y):

[tex]Fy(0.72) = (0.72)^2/4 = 0.1296[/tex]

For similar question on probability.

https://brainly.com/question/30403935

#SPJ11

Since X1 and X2 are uniformly distributed over [0, 2], their probability density functions (PDFs) are:

fX1(x) = fX2(x) = 1/2, for 0 <= x <= 2

To find the CDF of Y = max(X1, X2), we need to consider two cases:

1. If y <= 0, then Fy(y) = P(Y <= y) = 0

2. If 0 < y <= 2, then Fy(y) = P(Y <= y) = P(max(X1, X2) <= y)

We can find this probability by considering the complementary event, i.e., the probability that both X1 and X2 are less than or equal to y. Since X1 and X2 are independent, this probability is:

P(X1 <= y, X2 <= y) = P(X1 <= y) * P(X2 <= y) = (y/2) * (y/2) = y^2/4

Therefore, the CDF of Y is:

Fy(y) = P(Y <= y) =

0,          y <= 0

y^2/4,      0 < y <= 2

1,          y > 2

To find Fy(0.72), we substitute y = 0.72 into the CDF:

Fy(0.72) = 0.72^2/4 = 0.1296

Therefore, the value of Fy(y) at y = 0.72 is 0.1296.

Learn more about cumulative distribution function (CDF) here: brainly.com/question/31961014

#SPJ11

The eigenvalues of the given matrix are λ₁ = 1/10 and λ₂ = 21/10, and their associated eigenvectors are [3, 1] and [1, -2], respectively.

To find the eigenvalues and eigenvectors of the matrix, we need to solve the equation (A - λI)v = 0, where A is the given matrix, λ is the eigenvalue, I is the identity matrix, and v is the eigenvector.

For the given matrix |2 3 ||0 9/10 |, subtracting λI gives the matrix |2 - λ 3 ||0 9/10 - λ |. Setting this matrix equal to zero and solving the system of equations yields the eigenvalues.

By solving (2 - λ)(9/10 - λ) - 3*0 = 0, we obtain the eigenvalues λ₁ = 1/10 and λ₂ = 21/10.

To find the eigenvectors, we substitute each eigenvalue back into the equation (A - λI)v = 0 and solve for v.

For λ₁ = 1/10, solving (2 - (1/10))x + 3y = 0 and 3x + ((9/10) - (1/10))y = 0 gives the eigenvector [3, 1].

Similarly, for λ₂ = 21/10, solving (2 - (21/10))x + 3y = 0 and 3x + ((9/10) - (21/10))y = 0 gives the eigenvector [1, -2].

In summary, the eigenvalues of the given matrix are λ₁ = 1/10 and λ₂ = 21/10, and their associated eigenvectors are [3, 1] and [1, -2], respectively

Learn more about eigenvalues here:

https://brainly.com/question/29861415

#SPJ11

π(2ft)2(10ft) + π(2ft)2(13ft − 10ft) is used to calculate the total volume of grains that can be stored in the silo.(option-c)

The total volume of grains that can be kept in the silo is calculated as (2ft)2(10ft) + (2ft)2(13ft 10ft).(option-c)

The formula $V = gives the volume of a cylinder.

$, where $r$ denotes the base's radius and $h$ denotes its height. The equation $V = gives the volume of a cone.

$, where $r$ denotes the base's radius and $h$ denotes its height.

The silo is made up of a cone with a height of 3 feet and a radius of 2 feet, as well as a 10 foot tall cylinder with the same dimensions. Consequently, the silo's overall volume is V =

V = [tex]\pi (2ft)^2 (10ft) + \frac{1}{3} \pi (2ft)^2 (3ft)[/tex]

V =[tex]\pi (4ft^2) (10ft) + \frac{1}{3} \pi (4ft^2) (3ft)[/tex]

V = [tex]40 \pi ft^3 + 4 \pi ft^3[/tex]

V = [tex]44 \pi ft^3[/tex](option-c)

For such more questions on volume

https://brainly.com/question/463363

#SPJ8

Answer:

write a letter about you receiveing a gift from aunt

The graph of the equation 7x² + 3 = y² is symmetric with respect to B. X-axis and y-axis only.

To test for symmetry with respect to the x-axis, y-axis, and the origin, we need to check if replacing 'x' with '-x', 'y' with '-y', or both leaves the equation unchanged.

For the given equation, when we replace 'x' with '-x', the equation becomes 7(-x)² + 3 = y², which simplifies to 7x² + 3 = y². This indicates that the equation remains the same, so the graph is symmetric with respect to the y-axis.

When we replace 'y' with '-y', the equation becomes 7x² + 3 = (-y)², which simplifies to 7x² + 3 = y². Again, the equation remains the same, indicating symmetry with respect to the origin.

However, when we replace both 'x' with '-x' and 'y' with '-y', the equation becomes 7(-x)² + 3 = (-y)², which simplifies to 7x² + 3 = y². Here, the equation does not remain the same, indicating that the graph is not symmetric with respect to the x-axis.

To visually verify these symmetries, one can use a graphing calculator to plot the graph of the equation. The graph will exhibit symmetry with respect to the y-axis and the origin, but not with respect to the x-axis. Therefore, the correct answer is B. X-axis and y-axis only.

Learn more about symmetry here:

https://brainly.com/question/29044130

#SPJ11

The equation you provided is:

x² + 4x + 4 + y² - 6y + 9 = 5 + 4 + 9

Simplifying both sides of the equation, we have:

x² + 4x + y² - 6y + 13 = 18

Combining like terms, we get:

x² + 4x + y² - 6y - 5 = 0

This is the simplified form of the equation.

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

[tex]\int\limits^a_b {x} \, dx i \lim_{n \to \infty} a_n \\\\\\.......\\..\\\\solving:\\\\x^{2}+y^{2} + 4x-6y = 5[/tex]

By using the unitary method, we set up a proportion and solved it to find that each individual can of Frappuccino costs $2.72.

Let's assume that the cost of each individual can of Frappuccino is x dollars. We know that a 4-pack of Frappuccino's costs $10.88.

Using the unitary method, we can set up a proportion to solve for x:

(Number of units)/(Total cost) = (Number of units)/(Cost per unit)

In this case, the number of units is 4 (since we have a 4-pack), and the total cost is $10.88. The cost per unit is x.

So, we can write the proportion as:

4 / $10.88 = 1 / x

Now, we can solve this proportion to find the value of x.

First, let's cross-multiply:

4 * x = $10.88 * 1

4x = $10.88

To isolate x, we divide both sides of the equation by 4:

x = $10.88 / 4

x = $2.72

Therefore, each individual can of Frappuccino costs $2.72.

To know more about unitary method here

https://brainly.com/question/28276953

#SPJ4