The journal entry that explains how someone who was native american might viewed their world before the Europeans came is given below:
The Journal EntryBefore European contact, Native Americans revered the natural world deeply and believed in harmony, respect, and balance with it. Their worldview was based on sustainability and conservation, but it underwent a profound transformation with European contact.
New technologies, diseases, and ideologies disrupted the social, cultural, and ecological balance. Assimilation, land dispossession, and marginalization eroded Native Americans' traditional way of life. European concepts like private land ownership and resource extraction clashed with their communal values, causing profound loss and trauma.
Their once-harmonious worldview was fragmented, and they were forced to adapt to a world shaped by European dominance, resulting in significant social, cultural, and environmental consequences.
Read more about Native Americans here:
https://brainly.com/question/24724492
#SPJ4
After World War II, occupied separate zones of Korea
Answer:
After World War II, Korea was occupied by separate zones controlled by the Soviet Union in the north and the United States in the south. The 38th parallel was established as the dividing line between the two zones, with the Soviet Union occupying the north of the line and the United States occupying the south. This division was intended to be temporary, but as tensions grew between the two superpowers during the Cold War, the division became more permanent.
In 1948, separate governments were established in the north and south of Korea, with the Soviet-backed government in the north and the U.S.-backed government in the south. The two governments had different political ideologies and economic systems, with the North being communist and the South being capitalist.
In 1950, North Korea invaded South Korea, sparking the Korean War. The war lasted until 1953, when an armistice was signed that established a demilitarized zone (DMZ) between the two Koreas. The DMZ remains in place to this day, and the two Koreas have never signed a peace treaty, meaning that technically they are still at war.
Since the end of the Korean War, North and South Korea have pursued very different paths of development. The North has remained a one-party communist state, while the South has become a vibrant democracy and one of the world's largest economies. Relations between the two Koreas have been tense and often hostile, with occasional outbreaks of violence and provocations from both sides.
3. Soviet Union and United States
he checks (should not) show _______. he should use language that is_______ and _______. why? he is there to give another ( the captured people) ______ and ______. not there for themselves
He checks should not show discrimination. He should use language that is inclusive and respectful. He is there to give another perspective and guidance, not there for themselves.
The reason for this is that he is there to provide another perspective and understanding to the captured people. By avoiding bias and discrimination, he creates a safe and non-judgmental environment for open communication and learning. Using inclusive language ensures that everyone feels valued and included, regardless of their background or beliefs. Respectful language further reinforces the notion that he is focused on the well-being and growth of the captured individuals rather than pursuing personal agendas.
The captured people may have been through challenging experiences or difficult circumstances, and his role is to offer them a fresh perspective and guidance that can help them navigate their situation. By providing another perspective, he can shed light on different possibilities, solutions, or insights that they might not have considered before. His primary focus is on assisting the captured individuals in finding their own paths forward and supporting their personal growth, rather than fulfilling personal agendas or seeking personal gain.
To learn more about discrimination follow the link:
https://brainly.com/question/14896067
#SPJ4
Causes and Effects What role did Jackson’s popularity play in the elections of 1836 and 1840?
Andrew Jackson was a popular President who had gained a great deal of support from the American people. His popularity played an essential role in the elections of 1836 and 1840.
The following are the causes and effects of his popularity in these two elections:
Cause 1: Jackson was seen as a strong leader who stood up for the common man. He was a charismatic figure who had won the hearts of many Americans.
Effect 1: Jackson's popularity helped him win the presidency in 1828 and 1832. His influence was so great that he was able to choose his successor in 1836.
Cause 2: The Whig Party emerged in 1836 as a result of Jackson's policies. They were opposed to Jackson's economic policies and wanted to limit the power of the executive branch.
Effect 2: Jackson's popularity helped his chosen candidate, Martin Van Buren, win the presidency in 1836. However, the Whigs were able to win the presidency in 1840 by capitalizing on Jackson's weaknesses.
Cause 3: Jackson's policies, such as his veto of the Second Bank of the United States, made him a controversial figure. Some Americans saw him as a tyrant who was abusing his power.
Effect 3: Jackson's popularity declined in the years leading up to the election of 1840. The Whigs were able to exploit this decline by portraying themselves as the defenders of liberty and the common man.
To know more about President visit:
https://brainly.com/question/11616771
#SPJ11
Analyze Causes What democratic traditions were threatened by Parliament’s policies?
Parliament's policies threatened several democratic traditions, including the right to representation, the principle of no taxation without consent, and the protection of individual liberties.
Parliament's policies during the period leading up to the American Revolution posed a threat to various democratic traditions. Firstly, the right to representation was undermined. Colonists argued that since they were being taxed by the British government, they should have a say in the decision-making process.
However, Parliament implemented policies and taxation without providing colonial representation, which violated the democratic principle of government by the consent of the governed.
Secondly, the principle of no taxation without consent was at stake. The colonists believed that they should not be subjected to taxes imposed by a distant authority in which they had no representation. They viewed this as a violation of their democratic rights, as they were being taxed without their consent or the ability to influence the decisions made by Parliament.
learn more about parliament:
https://brainly.com/question/1146179
#SPJ4
Make Inferences How might living in different cultures have helped Sacagawea as a guide?
Answer:
The inferences are Language skills, cultural understanding, Survival skills, Geographical knowledge and social collaboration
Explanation:
Language Skills: Sacagawea belonged to the Shoshone tribe but was later captured and lived among the Hidatsa tribe. As a result, she became fluent in both Shoshone and Hidatsa languages. This linguistic diversity would have been invaluable during her time as a guide, as she could communicate with various Native American tribes encountered along the journey, acting as an interpreter between different cultures.
Cultural Understanding: Sacagawea's exposure to different cultures allowed her to develop a deep understanding of Native American customs, traditions, and protocols. This understanding would have helped her navigate interactions with different tribes and ensure a more respectful and peaceful engagement between the expedition and Native Americans they encountered. Her cultural sensitivity would have made her a valuable mediator and facilitator of communication.
Survival Skills: Living in different cultures likely exposed Sacagawea to a variety of survival techniques, such as hunting, fishing, gathering food, and navigating different terrains. These skills would have been essential for survival during the arduous journey through unfamiliar territories. Sacagawea's knowledge of diverse environments, natural resources, and ways to adapt would have contributed to the expedition's overall success.
Geographic Knowledge: Sacagawea's familiarity with different cultures would have also expanded her knowledge of the geography of the regions she inhabited. She would have been aware of various landmarks, rivers, mountains, and trails, which would have been valuable when guiding the expedition through unfamiliar territory. Her understanding of the land could have helped the group navigate and make strategic decisions.
Social Connections: Sacagawea's interactions with different cultures might have provided her with valuable social connections and networks. She may have known individuals from different tribes who could offer assistance, information, or safe passage during the expedition. These relationships could have been crucial for securing supplies, guiding the group, or mitigating potential conflicts.
Choose the best answer from each pair.
William Becknell helped open this trail to pioneers. (Oregon Trail/Santa Fe Trail)
William Becknell helped open the Santa Fe Trail to pioneers.
The Santa Fe Trail was a significant trade and transportation route in the 19th century, connecting Missouri with Santa Fe, New Mexico. It played a crucial role in facilitating trade between the United States and Mexico, particularly in the exchange of goods like furs, textiles, and manufactured items.
The trail not only opened up new economic opportunities but also fostered cultural exchange between the two regions. It served as a lifeline for pioneers, traders, and merchants, contributing to the westward expansion and development of the American frontier.
Learn more about Santa Fe Trail here:
https://brainly.com/question/29761968
#SPJ4
The complete question would be:
William Becknell helped open this trail to pioneers: the Oregon Trail or the Santa Fe Trail?
From our film "We Shall Remain: After the Mayflower": after the
war with the English, the defeated Wampanoag were able to keep
their lands they had before the war
Group of answer choices
True
False
The statement, "From our film 'We Shall Remain: After the Mayflower': after the war with the English, the defeated Wampanoag were able to keep their lands they had before the war," is false because the Wampanoag did not retain their lands after the war with the English.
In reality, after the war with the English, the Wampanoag did not succeed in keeping their lands that they had before the war. The conflict between the Wampanoag and the English colonists, known as King Philip's War (1675-1676), resulted in a decisive English victory. The war had devastating consequences for the Wampanoag people, leading to the loss of their territories and significant dislocation.
Many Wampanoag communities were destroyed, and survivors were either killed, captured, or forced to flee their ancestral lands. The English colonists expanded their control over the region, leading to significant changes in the land ownership and displacement of Native populations.
To know more about Wampanoag , click here.
https://brainly.com/question/29519444
#SPJ4
Explain the importance of
• Copperheads • Clara Barton
• writ of habeus corpus
Copperheads were an important part of the American Civil War. They were Northern Democrats who opposed the Lincoln administration's war policies and wanted the war to end with a peaceful settlement.
This group of people was key in shaping the course of the war, as they helped to sway the public opinion in the North against the war. They formed the Union party and held sway in some state legislatures, where they passed laws meant to impede the war effort, such as imposing high taxes on certain items related to the war.
This taxation, and their opposition to the war, served to cause even wider divisions among the populace than already existed. Copperheads also played a key role in inflaming distrust and hatred between the opposing factions.
They sought to "persuade" citizens in the North to join their cause, and in doing so, they caused significant sectarian divides. The disdain for the Copperheads was so deep that their homes and businesses were sometimes the targets of violence. Copperheads were thus an important part of the Civil War, having a profound effect on both the course of the war and the way the American people viewed the conflict.
To know more about Copperheads , click here:
https://brainly.com/question/1488582
#SPJ4
The Question-
Explain the importance of Copperheads
what was one main reason electric motors were significant to the industrialization of the late nineteenth century?
Answer:
One main reason electric motors were significant to industrialization in the late 19th century was that they enabled the widespread use of factory machinery powered by electric current instead of steam engines. This had several important effects:
1. Electric motors were cheaper and smaller than steam engines, so they could be used to power individual machines instead of an entire factory via a central steam plant. This allowed for more flexible manufacturing processes.
2. Electric motors could provide more precise and reliable power to machines, improving productivity and quality control. They were easy to start and stop and could run at multiple speeds.
3. Electric motors gave factory owners more freedom in arranging and rearranging machinery within factories. They were not tied to steam pipes and main shafts like steam-powered systems.
4. Electric motors simplified factory operations by eliminating belts, pulleys, gears and other transmission devices used with steam engines. This made factories cleaner, safer and easier to operate and maintain.
5. The increased use of machine tools like lathes, drill presses, saws and grinding wheels powered by electric motors allowed for mass production of interchangeable parts and standardized components. This revolutionized manufacturing processes.
So in summary, the widespread adoption of electric motors in factories during industrialization enabled the move away from steam power, allowed for more flexible and precise machine operation, and facilitated the rise of mass production techniques. They were thus a critical technological enabler of late 19th century industrialization.
Compare and Contrast What are some of the similarities and differences between the American Revolution and the French Revolution?
The American Revolution (1775-1783) and the French Revolution (1789-1799) were two huge occasions. While the two unrests shared specific likenesses, for example, their objectives of testing government and laying out additional libertarian social orders, they likewise showed particular contrasts in their causes, techniques, and results.
American Revolution: The American pilgrims took part in a prevalently equipped struggle against the English Crown, with prominent occasions like the clashes of Lexington and Harmony, the Attack of Yorktown, and the development of local armies and Mainland Armed force.
French Revolution: The French Revolution enveloped a more extensive scope of activities, including famous uprisings, political and social changes, the raging of the Bastille, the Rule of Fear, and the ascent of Napoleon Bonaparte.
Learn more about French Revolution, from:
brainly.com/question/27833385
#SPJ4
Make Inferences Which cartoon is sympathetic to the colonists?
Answer
One cartoon that is commonly considered sympathetic to the colonists during the American Revolution is "Join, or Die."
Explanation:
"Join, or Die" is a political cartoon created by Benjamin Franklin and published in 1754. Although it predates the American Revolution, it symbolizes the unity and cooperation needed among the American colonies to resist British control. The cartoon depicts a severed snake divided into segments representing different colonies. The message conveyed is that the colonies must unite and work together to defend their interests against the British Empire.
Causes and Effects What effects did Native American unity have on the United States?
Native American unity had several effects on the United States. One effect was that it posed a challenge to the expansion of the United States into Native American territories.
When Native American tribes were united, they were able to resist and defend their lands against encroachment by American settlers. This resulted in conflicts and wars between Native American tribes and the United States, such as the Battle of Little Bighorn and the Red Cloud's War.
Additionally, Native American unity influenced the government's policies towards Native Americans. The United States recognized that dealing with a united front of tribes would be more challenging, and therefore sought to undermine and divide them.
The government implemented policies such as the Dawes Act and Indian boarding schools, which aimed to assimilate Native Americans into American culture and break down their unity. These policies had long-lasting negative effects on Native American communities, including the loss of traditional lands, cultural suppression, and the erosion of tribal unity.
In conclusion, Native American unity had both immediate and long-term effects on the United States. It challenged American expansion and influenced government policies towards Native Americans, leading to conflicts and negative consequences for Native American communities.
To know more about American visit:
https://brainly.com/question/1560852
#SPJ11
Connect Today to What are some issues that the two leading American political parties disagree on today?
The Democratic and Republican parties in the United States disagree on several key issues today.
The disagreements of the Democratic and Republican partiesDemocrats generally support expanding access to healthcare, progressive taxation, climate change action, comprehensive immigration reform, stricter gun control measures, and progressive stances on social issues.
Republicans, on the other hand, tend to favor limited government involvement in healthcare, lower taxes, varied positions on climate change, stricter immigration enforcement, protecting Second Amendment rights, and conservative positions on social issues.
It's important to note that individual politicians within each party may hold different views, and party stances can change over time.
Read more on political parties here https://brainly.com/question/19298043
#SPJ4
1. True or false? The House and the Senate each have to pass an identical version of a bill before it can be signed into law by the President.
2. What is the role of Congress in the policymaking process?
1) The given statement, "The House and the Senate each have to pass an identical version of a bill before it can be signed into law by the President," is false because the House and the Senate can pass different versions of a bill. 2) The role of Congress in the policymaking process is to propose, debate, and pass legislation that can become law.
1) In the legislative process, both the House of Representatives and the Senate need to pass a bill, but they can propose and pass different versions of it. If the two chambers pass different versions, the bill goes through a process called reconciliation. During reconciliation, representatives from both chambers come together to resolve the differences between the two versions and create a single, unified bill.
2) Congress plays a crucial role in the policymaking process by proposing, debating, and passing legislation that can be enacted into law. As the legislative branch of the U.S. government, it represents the interests of the people, conducts hearings, and votes on bills, shaping the direction and implementation of public policy.
To know more about policymaking , click here.
https://brainly.com/question/30488596
#SPJ4
In september of 1774, delegates from all of the 13 colonies (except georgia) met in philadelphia to discuss the worsening situation with the english. this meeting was called the?
The First Continental Congress was an important event in American history that helped set the stage for the American Revolution. It was a significant step toward colonial unity and resistance to British authority, and it established a framework for future collaboration and action by the colonies.
In September of 1774, delegates from all of the 13 colonies (except Georgia) met in Philadelphia to discuss the worsening situation with the English. This meeting was called the First Continental Congress.
The First Continental Congress met in 1774 in response to the British Parliament's passage of the Coercive Acts, which were intended to punish the colonies for the Boston Tea Party and to strengthen British authority over colonial affairs. The Congress resolved to stop the importation of British goods and to demand that the Coercive Acts be repealed. It also approved a statement of grievances and rights that affirmed the colonists' loyalty to the British Crown while also asserting their right to self-government and freedom from parliamentary authority. It established the Continental Association, which would oversee the enforcement of a boycott of British goods, and agreed to reconvene in May 1775 if their demands were not met.
In September of 1774, delegates from all of the 13 colonies (except Georgia) met in Philadelphia to discuss the worsening situation with the English. This meeting was called the First Continental Congress. The Coercive Acts, which were intended to punish the colonies for the Boston Tea Party and to strengthen British authority over colonial affairs, prompted the Congress to meet.
The Congress resolved to stop the importation of British goods and to demand that the Coercive Acts be repealed. It also approved a statement of grievances and rights that affirmed the colonists' loyalty to the British Crown while also asserting their right to self-government and freedom from parliamentary authority. It established the Continental Association, which would oversee the enforcement of a boycott of British goods, and agreed to reconvene in May 1775 if their demands were not met.
The First Continental Congress was an important event in American history that helped set the stage for the American Revolution. It was a significant step toward colonial unity and resistance to British authority, and it established a framework for future collaboration and action by the colonies.
To know more about collaboration visit:
brainly.com/question/30235523
#SPJ11
Read questions 2â€"3 and choose the best answer.
How did World War II lead to one of the largest population shifts in U.S. history?
A. The loss of loved ones led people to move in with their families.
B. American citizens were forced to leave their homes for Europe.
C. People moved to states with military bases and factories for better jobs.
D. People moved to the middle of the country to escape wars on both coasts.
The correct answer is C. People moved to states with military bases and factories for better jobs.
During World War II, the United States experienced a significant population shift due to the expansion of military bases and the rapid growth of industrial production to support the war effort.
This led to a surge in job opportunities in states with military bases and factories. As a result, many people relocated to these areas in search of better employment prospects.
The establishment of military bases and the increased demand for wartime production created a need for workers in these regions. As a result, individuals from various parts of the country migrated to states with military installations and factories to secure employment and contribute to the war effort.
This mass migration of people seeking better job opportunities in areas of concentrated military and industrial activity is what led to one of the largest population shifts in U.S. history during World War II.
It is important to note that options A, B, and D are not accurate explanations for the significant population shift during World War II.
The loss of loved ones, forced relocation to Europe, or escaping wars on both coasts were not primary factors contributing to the large-scale population shift during this period. The movement was primarily driven by economic opportunities and the need to support the war effort.
To learn more about World War II, refer to the link:
https://brainly.com/question/651584
#SPJ4
What hardships did civilians suffer during the war?
Civilians during times of war often endure significant hardships like Displacement and Refugees, Loss of Life and Injury, Economic Hardship, Food Insecurity and Hunger etc
Displacement and Refugees: Many civilians are forced to flee their homes and become displaced due to the destruction and violence of war.
Loss of Life and Injury: Civilians bear the brunt of casualties in war, with countless lives lost or forever altered due to direct attacks, bombings, or indiscriminate violence.
Economic Hardship: War disrupts economies, leading to job loss, inflation, and economic instability.
Food Insecurity and Hunger: Conflict often disrupts agricultural activities, leading to food shortages and limited access to nutritious food.
Learn more about refugees here:
brainly.com/question/4690819
#SPJ4
Use the Terms & Names list to complete each sentence online or on your own paper.
A. U.S.S Maine
B. Boxer Rebellion
C. Open Door Policy
D. George Dewey
E. William Seward
F. Anti-Imperialist League
G. Roosevelt Corollary
H. Platt Amendment
I. Rough Riders
J. Panama Canal
K. Imperialism
L. Yellow Journalism
M. Sphere of Influence
N. Spanish-American War
O. Queen Liliuokalani
Reporting that sensationalized the news was known as ____
According to the given statement Reporting that sensationalized the news was known as yellow journalism.
Yellow journalism refers to the practice of exaggerating or sensationalizing news stories to attract readers or viewers. This type of reporting often involves using bold headlines, vivid images, and exaggerated claims to grab attention and sell newspapers.
Yellow journalism emerged in the late 19th century and early 20th century, particularly during the Spanish-American War. Reporters would sometimes fabricate stories or manipulate facts to create a more dramatic narrative. The goal was to increase circulation and influence public opinion.
Examples of yellow journalism during this time include stories about the sinking of the U.S.S. Maine, which played a role in building public support for the Spanish-American War. Another example is the reporting on the Boxer Rebellion in China, which fueled anti-Chinese sentiment in the United States. Yellow journalism eventually led to public demand for more accurate and ethical reporting, and it played a significant role in shaping the history of journalism in the United States.
To know more about yellow journalism visit:
brainly.com/question/29782292
#SPJ11
Make Inferences What were some long-term effects of the Vietnam War?
The Vietnam War had several long-term effects and continues to shape many aspects of today's society. First, war was widely viewed as unnecessary and based on false assumptions, leading to a loss of confidence in government.
The war also fueled anti-war sentiment and activism, increased skepticism about military intervention, and focused on diplomatic solutions to future conflicts. In addition, the war had a significant impact on veterans, many of whom suffered physical and mental health problems and difficulties reintegrating into civilian life. It also drew attention to the plight of prisoners of war and the need for better support systems for returning soldiers.
The divisive nature of war and its impact on society continues to be an important subject of debate and reflection, influencing foreign policy decisions and military operations.
To learn more about Vietnam War:
https://brainly.com/question/182779
#SPJ4
Problems and Solutions Why did the colonists react so violently to the Tea Act?
The colonists reacted violently to the Tea Act for several reasons. First, the Tea Act of 1773 allowed the British East India Company to have a monopoly on tea trade in the colonies. This meant that colonists could only buy tea from this company, which angered local merchants and smugglers who relied on tea trade for their livelihoods.
Second, the Tea Act also imposed a tax on tea, although it made the price of tea lower overall. This angered the colonists because they believed that Parliament did not have the right to tax them without their consent. They viewed the tax as a violation of their rights as British subjects.
Third, the colonists saw the Tea Act as another example of British oppression and control over their trade. They felt that it was an attempt to assert British authority and maintain control over the colonies.
As a result of these grievances, the colonists reacted violently to the Tea Act. They organized protests, such as the Boston Tea Party, where they dumped tea into the harbor. These actions were a form of resistance and a way for the colonists to assert their opposition to British policies. The violent reaction to the Tea Act ultimately contributed to the growing tensions between the colonies and Britain, and played a significant role in the lead-up to the American Revolution.
To know more about violently visit:
https://brainly.com/question/27409768
#SPJ11
who was the open door policy suggested by
Answer:The US secretary of State John Hay
Explanation:
Secretary of State John Hay
The iconography in later Chavin art is more complicated than that of earlier Chavin art. True False QUESTION 9 Andean gold is often covered over with the mineral cinnabar. True False QUESTION 10 Chavin de Huántar could most correctly be imagined as... A. an empire. B. a merchant center. C. a kingdom. D. a religious cult.
Answer:
True for question 9.
For question 10, the correct answer is D. a religious cult. Chavin de Huantar was a religious and political center of the Chavin culture, which is known for its distinctive art and architecture. It was not an empire, kingdom, or merchant center, but rather a site of pilgrimage and religious ceremony.
Explain how the terms and names in each group are related.
Alvin York, Eddie Rickenbacker
Alvin York and Eddie Rickenbacker are both well-known figures in American history who were associated with World War I. However, they were involved in different aspects of the war.
Alvin York was a decorated soldier in the United States Army and is known for his bravery and achievements on the battlefield. He was a conscientious objector at the beginning of the war but later enlisted and became famous for his actions during the Meuse-Argonne Offensive in 1918. York's exploits earned him the Medal of Honor for his exceptional marksmanship and capture of numerous enemy soldiers.
On the other hand, Eddie Rickenbacker was a skilled pilot and an American flying ace. He was known for his incredible aerial combat skills and leadership abilities. Rickenbacker served in the United States Army Air Service and became the top American ace of World War I, shooting down 26 enemy aircraft.
While both York and Rickenbacker served their country during World War I, they did so in different roles. York was a ground soldier, while Rickenbacker was an aviator. However, both individuals played significant roles in the war effort and contributed to the Allied victory.
In summary, Alvin York and Eddie Rickenbacker are related in the sense that they were prominent figures during World War I. However, their specific contributions differed, with York being a soldier and Rickenbacker being a pilot.
To know more about Rickenbacker visit:
https://brainly.com/question/1155496
#SPJ11
One goal of U'S. imperialism in the Philippines was
A. To remove a theocracy
B. To replace Catholicism with Protestant Christianity
C. To build a new cathedral in Manila
D. To confront the spread of evangelicalism there
One goal of U.S. imperialism in the Philippines was to confront the spread of evangelicalism there. The correct option is D.
During the period of U.S. imperialism in the Philippines, the United States sought to exert its influence and establish control over the newly acquired territory. As part of this effort, there were concerns about the spread of evangelical Protestantism in the Philippines, particularly from American missionaries. The U.S. government saw the influence of Protestant Christianity as a potential challenge to their authority and sought to confront and control its spread.
While the United States did not aim to remove a theocracy or replace Catholicism with Protestant Christianity, the goal of confronting the spread of evangelicalism aligns with the broader objective of establishing political, economic, and cultural dominance in the Philippines. By confronting and regulating the influence of Protestant missionaries, the U.S. government aimed to maintain control and ensure that their interests were prioritized in the region.
The correct option is D.
To know more about imperialism , click here.
https://brainly.com/question/6560298
#SPJ4
katsushika hokusai - primary source charles stewart smith collection, gift of mrs. charles stewart smith, charles stewart smith jr., and howard caswell smith, in memory of charles stewart smith, 1914 (made in the 19th century)
lThe primary source you are referring to is a collection of Japanese woodblock prints by Katsushika Hokusai (1760-1849), one of the most famous Japanese artists of all time.
How to explain the informationThe collection was donated to the Museum of Fine Arts, Boston in 1914 by Mrs. Charles Stewart Smith, Charles Stewart Smith Jr., and Howard Caswell Smith, in memory of their father, Charles Stewart Smith.
The collection includes over 1,000 prints, dating from the early 1800s to the late 1830s. The prints depict a wide variety of subjects, including landscapes, flowers, animals, and scenes from Japanese mythology and history.
The Charles Stewart Smith Collection is one of the most important collections of Japanese woodblock prints in the world. It is a valuable resource for scholars and students of Japanese art, and it is also a popular attraction for visitors to the Museum of Fine Arts, Boston.
Learn more about primary source
https://brainly.com/question/896456
#SPJ4
Make Inferences Why do you think that some of the people who fought for abolition also fought for women’s rights?
The 58
th
annual convention of the American Legion was held in Philadelphia from July 21 until July 24, 1976. People at the convention included American Legion delegates, their families, and other Legionnaires who were not official delegates. Between July 20 and August 30 , some of those who had been present became ill with a type of pneumonia that was subsequently name Legionnaires' disease. No one attending the convention developed the disease after August 30 . The numbers of delegates and nondelegates who developed Legionnaires' disease during the period July 20 to August 30 (a 41-day period) are as follows: a. Compute the absolute risk of Legionnaires' disease among delegates. Express as cases per 1000 persons. Remember to include time. b. Compute the absolute risk of Legionnaires' disease among nondelegates. Express as cases per 1000 persons. Remember to include time. c. Calculate the relative risk of Legionnaires' disease among delegates compared with nondelegates. d. State in words the meaning of the measure in c. e. Calculate the risk difference of Legionnaires' disease among delegates compared with nondelegates. Express as cases per 1000 persons. f. State in words the meaning of the measure in e. g. Calculate the attributable risk proportion of Legionnaires' disease among the delegates. h. State in words the meaning of the measure in f.
Absolute risk of Legionnaires' disease among delegates = 9.52 per 1000 persons, Absolute risk of Legionnaires' disease among nondelegates = 0.22 per 1000 persons, Legionnaires' disease among delegates compared with nondelegates = 43.27 and rest as explained below.
a. The absolute risk of Legionnaires' disease among delegates is 9.52 cases per 1000 persons (delegates) for 41 days. Absolute risk = (Number of cases / Total number of persons) × (1 / Total number of days) × 1000 Absolute risk of Legionnaires' disease among delegates = (2 / 210) × (1 / 41) × 1000 = 9.52 per 1000 persons
b. The absolute risk of Legionnaires' disease among nondelegates is 0.22 cases per 1000 persons (nondelegates) for 41 days. Absolute risk of Legionnaires' disease among nondelegates = (1 / 4640) × (1 / 41) × 1000 = 0.22 per 1000 persons
c. The relative risk of Legionnaires' disease among delegates compared with nondelegates is 43.27. Relative risk = Risk of disease among exposed / Risk of disease among non-exposed Relative risk of Legionnaires' disease among delegates compared with nondelegates = (9.52 / 0.22) = 43.27
d. The measure in c states that delegates are at 43.27 times greater risk of Legionnaires' disease than nondelegates.
e. The risk difference of Legionnaires' disease among delegates compared with nondelegates is 9.30 cases per 1000 persons. Risk difference = Risk of disease among exposed - Risk of disease among non-exposed Risk difference of Legionnaires' disease among delegates compared with nondelegates = 9.52 - 0.22 = 9.30 per 1000 persons
f. The measure in e states that there were 9.30 additional cases of Legionnaires' disease per 1000 persons among delegates compared to nondelegates.
g. The attributable risk proportion of Legionnaires' disease among delegates is 95.2%. Attributable risk proportion = (Risk among exposed - Risk among non-exposed) / Risk among exposed Attributable risk proportion of Legionnaires' disease among delegates = (9.52 - 0.22) / 9.52 × 100 = 95.2%
h. The measure in g states that 95.2% of Legionnaires' disease cases were attributable to the convention attendance among delegates.
To learn more about absolute risk, here:
https://brainly.com/question/31823374
#SPJ11
how did robert mcnamara describe the reason that the u.s. sent troops to vietnam? did this agree or disagree with what lyndon johnson said on tv to the american people?
Answer:
Robert McNamara, who served as Secretary of Defense under Presidents Kennedy and Johnson, described the reason that the U.S. sent troops to Vietnam as an effort to contain the spread of communism. He believed that the Vietnam War was part of a broader global struggle against communism, and that the U.S. had a responsibility to prevent the spread of communism in Southeast Asia.
This view is consistent with the policy of containment that had been adopted by the U.S. government in the early years of the Cold War, which sought to prevent the spread of communism through military and diplomatic means.
However, McNamara's view did not entirely agree with what President Lyndon Johnson said on TV to the American people. In his public statements, Johnson emphasized the need to defend South Vietnam from communist aggression and portrayed the U.S. involvement in Vietnam as a response to an external threat. He did not explicitly frame the war as part of a global struggle against communism, as McNamara did.
Furthermore, Johnson's public statements downplayed the difficulty of the conflict and the challenges that U.S. forces faced in Vietnam. He expressed confidence in the U.S. military's ability to achieve victory and reassured the American people that the war would not be a protracted conflict. McNamara, on the other hand, was well aware of the challenges and complexities of the war and expressed doubts about the effectiveness of U.S. strategy and tactics.
Overall, while McNamara and Johnson shared some common views about the reasons for U.S. involvement in Vietnam, there were also significant differences in how they framed the conflict and the challenges that the U.S. faced.
Explain the significance of each of the following.
gold standard
Answer:
Gold standard refers to a monetary system in which a country's currency is directly linked to a fixed amount of gold. Under the gold standard, the value of a currency is determined by its convertibility into a specific amount of gold.
This system has been historically significant for several reasons:
Stability and Trust: The gold standard provided stability and confidence in the monetary system. Since the value of a currency was tied to a tangible asset like gold, people had faith in the currency's value and were more likely to trust it as a medium of exchange.
Limiting Inflation: The gold standard acted as a restraint on government spending and inflation. Because the supply of gold is limited, it prevented excessive printing of money, thereby curbing inflationary pressures. It created a sense of fiscal discipline and helped maintain the purchasing power of the currency.
International Trade and Stability: The gold standard facilitated international trade by providing a common benchmark for currency values. It allowed for easier conversion between currencies, promoting economic cooperation and stability among nations. The fixed exchange rates offered predictability for businesses engaged in international trade.
Financial Discipline: Under the gold standard, governments were constrained by the need to maintain a stable gold reserve. This often meant adhering to balanced budgets and avoiding excessive debt accumulation. The gold standard fostered financial discipline and encouraged responsible fiscal policies.
Transition to Fiat Currency: The eventual abandonment of the gold standard marked a significant shift in monetary systems. Most countries moved towards fiat currency, where the value of money is not backed by a physical asset like gold. This transition allowed greater flexibility in monetary policy and facilitated government intervention during economic downturns.
Draw Conclusions Over time, do you think the Catholic Church’s missions were more helpful or harmful to the Native Americans? Explain.
The Catholic Church's missions had both helpful aspects, such as education and healthcare, and harmful effects, including cultural erasure and forced assimilation, making it difficult to make a definitive conclusion about their overall impact on Native Americans.
Assimilation refers to the process of incorporating or absorbing individuals or groups into a dominant culture, often resulting in the loss of their distinctive cultural practices, traditions, and identities.
In the context of the Catholic Church's missions and Native Americans, assimilation entailed pressuring indigenous people to adopt European customs, languages, and religious beliefs while suppressing their own cultural heritage.
This forced assimilation had profound consequences, leading to the erosion of Native American cultures, languages, and ways of life.
Assimilation efforts aimed to reshape indigenous populations in the image of the dominant society, often at the expense of their cultural autonomy and resilience.
Learn more about Assimilation here:
https://brainly.com/question/23064258
#SPJ4
