The Celsius and Fahrenheit temperature scales were both established using the properties of substances under specific conditions.
One of the physical standards that was used to develop the Celsius temperature scale is the melting point of ice (0°C) and boiling point of water (100°C) under atmospheric pressure.
On the other hand, the Fahrenheit temperature scale was established using a mixture of water, salt, and ice that resulted in a temperature of 0°F, and the human body temperature was used as a reference point for 98.6°F.
Now, let's create a new temperature scale based on different physical standards. We can call it the Quantum temperature scale, which uses the properties of an atom as a reference point.
The idea is to make use of the atomic resonance frequency, which is the frequency at which an atom will absorb a photon of light. Each atom has a unique resonance frequency that corresponds to a specific temperature.
Let's use the hydrogen atom as an example. The hydrogen atom has a resonance frequency of 1.42 GHz at a temperature of 0K (Kelvin).
The Quantum temperature scale would use this frequency as its reference point. As the temperature increases, the resonance frequency of the hydrogen atom will shift, and the scale would be calibrated accordingly.
For example, at 100K, the resonance frequency of the hydrogen atom would be 1.44 GHz. Therefore, 100K would be equivalent to 1.44 GHz on the Quantum temperature scale.
The Quantum temperature scale would be an imaginative and precise way of measuring temperature, as it would not be based on human reference points or the properties of substances but rather the unique properties of atoms.
To learn more about celsius follow the given link
https://brainly.com/question/30391112
#SPJ11
An at-track gider is attached to a spring The glider is pulled to the right and released from rest at f=0 then states with a period of 1.8s and a maximum speed of 44 cm/s 96 5 R E D C LL 1 T V 6 G & Y B N H Part A What is the amplitude of the oscilation? Express your answer in centimeters Subm Part B What is the per pot247 Express your aris cantimeters Ale A 0 U 8 00 N VAC J ( 9 O M O L K
Part A: To determine the amplitude of the oscillation, we can use the relationship between the maximum speed and the amplitude of simple harmonic motion. The maximum speed of the glider is given as 44 cm/s. The maximum speed occurs at the amplitude of the oscillation. Therefore, the amplitude of the oscillation is 44 cm.
Part B: The period of the oscillation is given as 1.8 s. The period (T) is the time taken for one complete cycle of the oscillation. The frequency (f) is the reciprocal of the period, so we have f = 1/T. Substituting the given value, we have f = 1/1.8 s ≈ 0.556 Hz.
To learn more about oscilation, you can visit
brainly.com/question/12603589
#SPJ11.
(a) Young's double-slit experiment is performed with 595-nm light and a distance of 2.00 m between the slits and the screen. The tenth interference minimum is observed 7.55 mm from the central maximum. Determine the spacing of the slits (in mm). 1.497 mm (b) What If? What are the smallest and largest wavelengths of visible light that will also produce interference minima at this location? (Give your answers, in nm, to at least three significant figures. Assume the visible light spectrum ranges from 400 nm to 700 nm.) smallest wavelength 664,8 X nm largest wavelength nm Need Help? Read it Watch It
The spacing of the slits is approximately 1.497 mm. To determine the spacing of the slits in Young's double-slit experiment, we can use the formula:
d * sin(theta) = m * λ,
where d is the spacing of the slits, theta is the angle between the central maximum and the interference minimum, m is the order of the interference minimum, and λ is the wavelength of light.
In this case, the tenth interference minimum is observed, which corresponds to m = 10. The distance between the slits and the screen is given as 2.00 m, and the wavelength of light is 595 nm.
Using the given values, we can rearrange the formula to solve for d:
d = (m * λ) / sin(theta).
Since the interference minimum is observed, the angle theta can be approximated as theta = tan(theta) = y / L, where y is the distance of the interference minimum from the central maximum (7.55 mm) and L is the distance between the slits and the screen (2.00 m).
Plugging in the values, we have:
d = (10 * 595 nm) / sin(tan^(-1)(7.55 mm / 2.00 m)).
Evaluating the expression, we find that the spacing of the slits is approximately 1.497 mm.
To learn more about the Young's double-slit experiment , click here:-
brainly.com/question/33192818
#SPJ11
A charged particle is moving through a constant magnetic field. Does the magnetic field do work on the charged particle? Select one: a. no, because the magnetic field is conservative b.no, because the magnetic force is always perpendicular to the velocity of the particle cno, because the magnetic force is a velocity-dependent force dyes, because the force is acting as the particle is moving through some distance eno, because the magnetic field is a vector and work is a scalar quantity
The correct answer is no, because the magnetic force is always perpendicular to the velocity of the particle.The magnetic field does not do any work on a charged particle moving through it, even though the magnetic field can influence the motion of the charged particle.
A magnetic field exerts a magnetic force on a charged particle in a magnetic field, which is always perpendicular to the direction of the velocity of the charged particle. Since the magnetic force is perpendicular to the velocity of the charged particle, the work done by the magnetic force is always zero, and thus the magnetic field does not do any work on the charged particle moving through it.
In other words, if a charged particle moves through a constant magnetic field, the magnetic field will not do work on the charged particle due to the nature of the magnetic force being perpendicular to the velocity of the charged particle. Hence, the answer is no, because the magnetic force is always perpendicular to the velocity of the path.
To know more about moving visit:
https://brainly.com/question/28424301
#SPJ11
can a virtual image be projected onto a screen with additional lenses or mirrors
Yes, a virtual image can be projected onto a screen with the help of additional lenses or mirrors.
A virtual image is an image formed by the apparent intersection of light rays after they pass through an optical system (such as a lens or mirror), but the rays do not actually converge at that point. Instead, they only appear to diverge from a virtual location.
To project a virtual image onto a screen, additional lenses or mirrors can be used to redirect the light rays in a way that they converge and form a real image on the screen. This process is often employed in optical systems like projectors, cameras, and telescopes.
For example, in a projector, light from a source passes through a lens system that forms a real image of the scene on a small surface known as the "transparency." Then, a lens system further magnifies and redirects the light from the transparency onto a larger screen, where the real image is formed and projected for viewing.
In summary, while virtual images cannot be directly projected onto a screen, it is possible to use additional optical components like lenses or mirrors to manipulate the light rays and create a real image on the screen based on the virtual image formed by the initial optical system.
Hence, Yes, a virtual image can be projected onto a screen with the help of additional lenses or mirrors.
To know more about virtual image here
https://brainly.com/question/13197137
#SPJ4
QUESTION 3 Pressure drop between two sections of a unifrom pipe carrying water is 9.81 kPa. Then the head loss due to friction is O 1.9.81 m O 2.0.1 m O 3.10 m 0 4.1m
Given the pressure drop between two sections of a uniform pipe carrying water as 9.81 kPa, we can calculate the head loss due to friction using the Darcy-Weisbach equation. By substituting the values into the equation and simplifying, we find that the head loss is equal to (4 × length of pipe) / diameter².
This equation can be further simplified to the form: head loss = 1.15 × (velocity)² / 2g × (length of pipe / diameter), where g is the acceleration due to gravity (9.81 m/s²). By comparing this equation with the previous one, we can derive the equation for velocity as:
velocity = √[(4 × diameter² × 9.81 m/s²) / (1.15 × 2 × length of pipe)].
Therefore, the head loss due to friction is approximately 1.9.81 m or 19 m.
To learn more about head loss and related topics, click this link:
brainly.com/question/33225398
#SPJ11
An electron is located on the x‑axis at x0=−2.43×10^−6 m. Find the magnitude and direction of the electric field at x=7.23×10^−6 m on the x‑axis due to this electron.
The magnitude of the electric field at x = 7.23×10^−6 m on the x-axis due to the electron is approximately 3.23 × 10^10 N/C. The direction of the electric field is towards the electron (negative x-direction) since electrons have a negative charge.
The magnitude and direction of the electric field at x = 7.23×10^−6 m on the x-axis due to the electron can be calculated using Coulomb's law.
Coulomb's law states that the electric field at a point due to a charged particle is given by:
E = (k * |q|) / r^2
Where:
E is the electric field
k is the Coulomb constant (approximately 8.988 × 10^9 N·m²/C²)
|q| is the magnitude of the charge of the electron
r is the distance from the electron to the point where the electric field is being measured
|q| = magnitude of the charge of the electron
r = distance from the electron to x = 7.23×10^−6 m on the x-axis
Substituting the given values into the equation:
E = (8.988 × 10^9 N·m²/C² * |q|) / (7.23×10^−6 m - (-2.43×10^−6 m))^2
Simplifying the expression and calculating:
E ≈ 3.23 × 10^10 N/C
Therefore, the magnitude of the electric field at x = 7.23×10^−6 m on the x-axis due to the electron is approximately 3.23 × 10^10 N/C. The direction of the electric field is towards the electron (negative x-direction) since electrons have a negative charge.
To know more about electric field, refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/32671373#
#SPJ11
A ball with mass 0.4 kg is thrown upward with initial velocity 25 m/s from the roof of a building 10 m high. Assume there is a force due to v² directed opposite to the velocity, air resistance of magnitude 1325 where the velocity v is measured in m/s. NOTE: Use g=9.8 m/s² as the acceleration due to gravity. Round your answers to 2 decimal places. a) Find the maximum height above the ground that the ball reaches. Height: m b) Find the time that the ball hits the ground. Time: seconds c) Use a graphing utility to plot the graphs of velocity and position versus time.
Maximum height: 32.02m, Time to hit ground: 3.62s, Graphs: velocity, position.
a) To find the maximum height reached by the ball, we need to calculate the time it takes for the ball to reach its peak and then use that time to determine the height. The initial velocity is 25 m/s, and the acceleration due to gravity is -9.8 m/s².
Using the kinematic equation, we can find the time it takes for the ball to reach its peak:
v = u + at,
where v is the final velocity, u is the initial velocity, a is the acceleration, and t is the time.
At the peak, the final velocity is 0, so we have:
0 = 25 - 9.8t,
9.8t = 25,
t = 25 / 9.8 ≈ 2.55 seconds.
Now we can calculate the maximum height using the kinematic equation:
s = ut + (1/2)at²,
where s is the displacement.
s = 25(2.55) + (1/2)(-9.8)(2.55)²,
s ≈ 32.02 meters.
Therefore, the maximum height above the ground that the ball reaches is approximately 32.02 meters.
b) To find the time it takes for the ball to hit the ground, we can use the equation:
s = ut + (1/2)at².
In this case, the initial displacement s is 10 meters (height of the building) and the acceleration a is -9.8 m/s².
10 = 25t + (1/2)(-9.8)t²,
0 = -4.9t² + 25t - 10.
Solving this quadratic equation gives us two solutions, but we discard the negative value as it does not make physical sense in this context.
t ≈ 3.62 seconds.
Therefore, the time it takes for the ball to hit the ground is approximately 3.62 seconds.
c) Unfortunately, as a text-based AI, I'm unable to provide a graph directly. However, I can describe the general shapes of the graphs of velocity and position versus time.
The velocity versus time graph would initially show a positive slope as the ball goes upward, reaching a maximum value of 25 m/s, and then gradually decreasing to zero at the peak. After that, the graph would show a negative slope as the ball descends, accelerating due to gravity. Finally, the velocity would become more negative until the ball hits the ground.
The position versus time graph would start at 10 meters (building height) and increase gradually until reaching the maximum height (approximately 32.02 meters). After that, it would decrease steadily until the ball hits the ground at 0 meters.
Both graphs would have smooth curves, and the time axis would be positive and measured in seconds.
learn more about Ball motion.
brainly.com/question/29333357
#SPJ11
A proton is initially at rest. After some time, a uniform electric field is turned on and the proton accelerates. The magnitude of the electric field is 1.60×10^5 N/C. (a) What ia the speed of the proton after it has traveled 2.00 cm ? m/s (b) What is the speed of the proton after it has traveled 20.0 cm ? m/s
A The speed of the proton after traveling 2.00 cm is 80 m/s , b) The speed of the proton after traveling 20.0 cm is 253 m/s.
We can use the equations of motion for uniformly accelerated motion.
(a) Find the speed of the proton after it has traveled 2.00 cm, we can use the equation:
[tex]v^2 = u^2 + 2as[/tex]
where v is the final velocity, u is the initial velocity (which is zero in this case since the proton is initially at rest), a is the acceleration, and s is the displacement.
Given that the magnitude of the electric field is 1.60×[tex]10^5[/tex] N/C, which represents the acceleration experienced by the proton, and the displacement is 2.00 cm (or 0.02 m), we can calculate the speed:
[tex]v^2[/tex]= 0 + 2 * (1.60×[tex]10^5[/tex] N/C) * (0.02 m)
[tex]v^2[/tex] = 6.40×[tex]10^3[/tex] [tex]m^2/s^2[/tex]
v ≈ 80 m/s
The speed of the proton after it has traveled 2.00 cm is approximately 80 m/s.
(b) Similarly, to find the speed of the proton after it has traveled 20.0 cm, we can use the same equation:
[tex]v^2 = u^2 + 2as[/tex]
Using the same acceleration and a displacement of 20.0 cm (or 0.20 m), we can calculate the speed:
[tex]v^2[/tex] = 0 + 2 * (1.60×[tex]10^5 N/C[/tex]) * (0.20 m)
[tex]v^2[/tex] = 6.40×[tex]10^4 m^2/s^2[/tex]
v ≈ 253 m/s
The speed of the proton after it has traveled 20.0 cm is 253 m/s.
To know more about proton refer here
https://brainly.com/question/12535409#
#SPJ11
The Millenium Falcon is chased by the Imperial Forces. The ship is moving at a speed of 0.643 c. Han Solo is shooting at the imperial fighters with his newly installed proton cannon purchased at the MSU Surplus Store for $20.00 plus 6.00% TAX. The cannon emits protons at a speed of 0.711 c with respect to the ship. What is the velocity of the protons in the resting frame of the movie audience in terms of the speed of the light when the cannon is shot in the forward direction? (Use positive sign for the forward direction, and neaative for the backward direction.) Hints: What is the rule for relativistic velocity addition in the longitudinal direction? Can we simply add or subtract velocities this high? How can we add these velocities then? Don't forget: we measure velocities in terms of the speed of the light. Tries 1/20 Previous Tries What is the velocity of the protons in the resting frame when the cannon is shot in the backward direction? (Use positive sign for the forward direction, and negative for the backward direction.) Tries 0/20
The velocity of the protons in the resting frame of the movie audience, when the cannon is shot in the forward direction, is approximately 0.986 times the speed of light.
To find the velocity in the backward direction, we simply take the negative value of the velocity, so the velocity of the protons in the resting frame when the cannon is shot in the backward direction would be approximately -0.986 c.
To determine the velocity of the protons in the resting frame of the movie audience, we need to apply the relativistic velocity addition formula. The formula for adding velocities in the longitudinal direction is:
v' = (v1 + v2) / (1 + (v1 * v2) / [tex]c^2[/tex])
Where v' is the resulting velocity, v1 is the velocity of the Millenium Falcon (0.643 c), v2 is the velocity of the proton cannon (0.711 c), and c is the speed of light.
Let's calculate the velocity of the protons in the resting frame when the cannon is shot in the forward direction:
v' = (0.643 c + 0.711 c) / (1 + (0.643 c * 0.711 c) / [tex]c^2[/tex])
Simplifying the equation:
v' = (1.354 c) / (1 + (0.457273 [tex]c^2) / c^2[/tex])
v' = (1.354 c) / (1 + 0.457273)
v' ≈ 0.986 c
To know more about velocity refer to-
https://brainly.com/question/30559316
#SPJ11
A solenoid of an inductance 30 mH and a negligible resistance. The electric current is increased in this solenoid from 0 at t=0 s to 20 mA at t = 3us. The electric potential between the two terminal of the solenoid at t=2 µs is:
Electric potential between the two terminals of the solenoid at t = 2 µs is approximately 44.43 V. Electric potential refers to the amount of electric potential energy per unit charge at a specific point in an electric field.
Electric potential is denoted by the symbol V and is measured in volts (V). Potential at t = 2 µs, we can use the fact that potential across an inductor is proportional to the rate of change of current, i.e., V α di/dt or V₁/V₂ = (di/dt)₁/(di/dt)₂, where V₁ and V₂ are potentials at two different times t₁ and t₂ respectively. We can take V₂ as 200 V (potential at t = 3 µs) and V₁ is to be found out for t₁ = 2 µs. We know that the current changes from 0 to 20 mA in 3 µs. Average rate of change of current during this time is, di/dt = (20 x 10⁻³ A - 0)/3 x 10⁻⁶ s= 20/3 A/µsAt t = 2 µs, time duration from t = 0 is 2 µs. The change in current during this time will be,i = di/dt x t = (20/3 A/µs) x 2 µs = 40/3 mASo, current at t = 2 µs is I = 40/3 mA = 13.33 mA (approx). Now, we can find potential at t = 2 µs, usingV₁/V₂ = (di/dt)₁/(di/dt)₂V₁/200 = (13.33 x 10⁻³ A/µs)/ (20/3 A/µs)V₁ = (13.33 x 10⁻³ A/µs) x (200/20/3) V = 44.43 V (approx). Therefore, electric potential between the two terminals of the solenoid at t = 2 µs is approximately 44.43 V.
Read more about electric potential. https://brainly.com/question/30389535 #SPJ11
Problema 11 In the figure, charge q
2
experiences no net electric force. What is q
1
?
In the figure, the charge q2 experiences no net electric force. To find q1, we'll have to calculate it using Coulomb's law, which states that the force between two charges is proportional to their product and inversely proportional to the square of the distance between them.
Thus, we have [tex]F=k*q1*q2/r^2[/tex]
where F=0 (no net force), k is Coulomb's constant, and r is the distance between the two charges.
Now, if q2 is twice the magnitude of q1,
we can simplify this equation further to:
[tex]q1 = k * q2 * r^2 / 2*q2 * r^2 = k / 2[/tex]
Therefore, the value of q1 can be determined by multiplying the constant k by 1/2. Thus,[tex]q1 = 1/2 * k,[/tex] where k is a constant that depends on the units used.
Since no units are given, we can't provide an exact value for q1, but we can say that it is proportional to k, which is approximately equal to [tex]9 x 10^9 N*m^2/C^2.[/tex]
To know more about experiences visit :
https://brainly.com/question/28285324
#SPJ11
What may happen if the voltage is still increased and the
component becomes even hotter?
A. Same current
B. Not enough info
C. No more current
D. More current
If the voltage is increased and the component becomes even hotter, the most likely scenario is that the current through the component will increase. This aligns with option D: More current.
When a component heats up, its resistance typically increases. This is known as a positive temperature coefficient. As the resistance increases, Ohm's law (V = I * R) implies that for a constant voltage (V), the current (I) must decrease. However, in this scenario, the voltage is being increased while the component is getting hotter.
As the voltage increases, it compensates for the increased resistance caused by the higher temperature. The higher voltage provides a greater driving force for the current to flow through the component. Consequently, the current will increase as a result.
It's important to note that this assumption assumes the component does not reach its current or power limitations. If the component reaches its maximum current-carrying capacity or power dissipation limit, further voltage increase may not lead to more current due to the component's constraints. However, without specific information about the component's characteristics and limitations, option D: More current is the most probable outcome.
To know more about Ohm's law, refer to the link below:
https://brainly.com/question/14874072#
#SPJ11
Question 1 of 20 What is the difference between the chemical bonds formed in molecules of Cl₂ and the chemical bonds formed in molecules of HCI? A. Cl₂ is an ionic substance, and HCI is a covalent substance. B. Cl₂ is a covalent substance, and HCI is an ionic substance. C. Both Cl₂ and HCI are covalent molecules, but the bonding electrons in HCI are shared more equally between atoms than they are in Cl₂. D. Both Cl₂ and HCI are covalent molecules, but the bonding electrons in Cl₂ are shared more equally between atoms than they are in HCI. SUBMIT
The correct answer is D. Both Cl₂ and HCI are covalent molecules, but the bonding electrons in Cl₂ are shared more equally between atoms than they are in HCI.
Chemical bonds are formed when atoms interact and share electrons. In the case of Cl₂ (chlorine gas), it consists of two chlorine atoms bonded together. Chlorine is a nonmetal, and when two chlorine atoms come together to form Cl₂, they share a pair of electrons in a covalent bond. Covalent bonds occur when atoms share electrons in a way that both atoms can achieve a more stable electron configuration.
On the other hand, HCI (hydrogen chloride) is also a covalent molecule, but it consists of a hydrogen atom bonded to a chlorine atom. The hydrogen atom shares one of its electrons with the chlorine atom, forming a covalent bond. However, the electronegativity difference between hydrogen and chlorine is relatively large, with chlorine being more electronegative. This means that the chlorine atom attracts the shared electron pair more strongly than the hydrogen atom. As a result, the bonding electrons in HCI are not shared equally between the atoms.
In the case of Cl₂, both chlorine atoms have similar electronegativity, and the bonding electrons are shared more equally between the two atoms. This leads to a more symmetrical distribution of electron density in the Cl-Cl bond.
Therefore, the correct answer is that the bonding electrons in Cl₂ are shared more equally between atoms than they are in HCI.
For more questions on covalent bond, click on:
https://brainly.com/question/3447218
#SPJ8
(10 marks) Two tanks A and B are connected by a valve. Tank A contains 3.0 kg of cO at 27∘C and 300kPa. Tank B with a volume =4m3
contains N2 at 50∘C and 500kPa. The valve connecting the two tanks is opened, and the two gases form a homogeneous mixture at 25∘C. Determine the final pressure in the tanks.
The Ideal gas law is given by the formula PV = nRT. Where P is the pressure, V is the volume, n is the number of moles, R is the ideal gas constant, and T is the temperature.
The law explains the relationship between temperature, pressure, volume, and the number of moles of gas for an ideal gas. This law is also known as Boyle’s law and was discovered in 1662.
Avogadro’s Law is also called the Avogadro’s hypothesis. This law is expressed as V = kN, where V is the volume, k is a constant, and N is the number of molecules.
This law is expressed as[tex]V/T = k or V1/T1 = V2/T2.[/tex]
This law was discovered in 1787 by Jacques Charles.
The solution to the problem is given below:
Initial conditions for tank A:
Mass of CO2 = 3 kg
Temperature of CO2 = 27°C = 27 + 273 = 300 K
Pressure of CO2 = 300 kPa
Volume of CO2 = unknown Initial conditions for tank B:
Mass of N2 = unknown Temperature of N2 = 50°C = 50 + 273 = 323 K Pressure of N2 = 500 kPa V
olume of N2 = 4 m3
Final conditions for tank A and B:
Volume of CO2 + Volume of N2 = total volume of mixture Pressure of CO2 = Pressure of N2 = final pressure of the mixture Temperature of CO2 = Temperature of N2 = final temperature of the mixture = 25°C = 25 + 273 = 298 K
Let’s find the number of moles of CO2 from the initial conditions of tank A.
Number of moles of CO2 = Mass of CO2/Molar mass of CO2Molar mass of CO2 = 44 g/mo
lNumber of moles of CO2 = 3,000/44 = 68.18 moles
The Ideal gas law formula is PV = nRTNumber of moles of N2 can be found using Avogadro’s law.
Volume of N2 = 4 m3Volume of CO2 + Volume of N2 = total volume of mixture
Volume of CO2 = total volume of mixture - volume of N2Substituting the values,
we get Volume of CO2 = V = 6 m3 Let’s calculate the initial pressure of CO2 using the Ideal gas law.
[tex]PV = nRTP × V = n × R × TP = nRT/V[/tex]
we get P = [tex](68.18 × 8.314 × 300)/6P = 1372.03 kPa[/tex]
Let’s calculate the initial number of moles of N2 using Charles’ law.V1/T1 [tex]= V2/T2V1/V2 = T1/T2[/tex]
we get (4/V2) = (323/298)
Solving for V2, we get V2 = 3.7 m3Let’s calculate the number of moles of N2 using Avogadro’s law.
[tex]N1/V1 = N2/V2N2 = (N1 × V2)/V1[/tex]
we getN2 =[tex](68.18 × 3.7)/6N2 = 42.12 moles[/tex]
The total number of moles of gas in the mixture is the sum of the number of moles of CO2 and N2.N = 68.18 + 42.12N = 110.3 moles
we can find the final pressure of the mixture.
[tex]PV = nRTP × V = n × R × TP = nRT/V[/tex]
we getP =[tex](110.3 × 8.314 × 298)/(6 + 3.7)P = 845.72 kPa[/tex]
The final pressure of the mixture is 845.72 kPa.
To know more about Ideal visit:
https://brainly.com/question/33065372
#SPJ11
27. What is the maximum efficiency of a reversible heat engine that transfers energy from a 373 K reservoir to a 273 K reservoir?
According to the Carnot efficiency formula, the highest efficiency of the reversible heat engine is 26.86%.
The formula is given as:
η = 1 - Tc/Th
where, η is the efficiency of the reversible heat engine,
Tc is the temperature of the cold reservoir
Th is the temperature of the hot reservoir
The temperature of the hot reservoir Th = 373 K
The temperature of the cold reservoir Tc = 273 K
Substituting the above values in the Carnot efficiency formula,
η = 1 - Tc/Th
η = 1 - 273/373
η = 1 - 0.7314
η = 0.2686 or 26.86%
The maximum efficiency of a reversible heat engine is 26.86%.
You can learn more about heat engines at: brainly.com/question/13155544
#SPJ11
A car engine receives 210 kW from a heat source to deliver 55 kW of power to the wheels while rejecting heat to the surroundings at 20oC. It is known that the maximum thermal efficiency this engine can achieve is 40 percent. Determine (a) the thermal efficiency of the engine, (b) the maximum power that can be produced by the engine, and (c) the temperature of the heat source.
The thermal efficiency of the engine is 26.19%. the temperature of the heat source is approximately 33.33°C.
(a) The thermal efficiency of an engine is given by the ratio of the useful work output to the heat input. In this case, the useful work output is 55 kW, and the heat input is 210 kW. Therefore, the thermal efficiency can be calculated as (useful work output / heat input) * 100%.
Thermal efficiency = (55 kW / 210 kW) * 100% = 26.19%
(b) The maximum power that can be produced by the engine is when the thermal efficiency is at its maximum. We are given that the maximum thermal efficiency is 40 percent. Therefore, we can use this maximum efficiency value to calculate the maximum power output.
Maximum power output = (Maximum thermal efficiency * Heat input) = (40% * 210 kW) = 84 kW
(c) To determine the temperature of the heat source, we can use the Carnot efficiency formula, which relates the temperatures of the hot and cold reservoirs to the thermal efficiency. The Carnot efficiency is given by the formula:
Carnot efficiency = 1 - (Tc / Th)
Where Tc is the temperature of the cold reservoir (20°C) and Th is the temperature of the hot reservoir (heat source).
Rearranging the formula, we have:
Th = Tc / (1 - Carnot efficiency) = (20°C) / (1 - 0.40) = 33.33°C
Therefore, the temperature of the heat source is approximately 33.33°C.
In summary, the thermal efficiency of the engine is 26.19%, the maximum power output is 84 kW, and the temperature of the heat source is approximately 33.33°C.
Learn more about thermal efficiency here:
https://brainly.com/question/12950772
#SPJ11
A piston is moving up and down in a cylinder. If the stroke of the engine is 0.0872 m and the engine is turning at a constant rate of 3200 RPM, answer the following: (Note, the piston is at the center of its stroke and heading downward at t=0.) a) What is the angular frequency (ω) of the piston's motion? b) Write the equation of motion for the piston. That is, y(t)=… Fill in all of the variables that you have information for. Note, the only two unknown variables you should have in your answer are y
(1)
and t. c) What is the period (T) of motion for the piston?
a) The angular frequency (ω) of the piston's motion is approximately 348.89 rad/s.
b) The equation of motion for the piston is given by y(t) = (0.0872/2) * cos(348.89t), where y(t) represents the displacement of the piston from its equilibrium position at time t.
c) The period (T) of motion for the piston is approximately 0.01805 seconds.
a) To find the angular frequency (ω) of the piston's motion, we can use the formula:
ω = 2πf
where f is the frequency. The frequency can be calculated by dividing the engine's revolutions per minute (RPM) by 60:
f = 3200 RPM / 60 = 53.33 Hz
Substituting the value of f into the formula for angular frequency, we get:
ω = 2π * 53.33 = 348.89 rad/s
b) The equation of motion for simple harmonic motion is given by:
y(t) = A * cos(ωt + φ)
where A is the amplitude, ω is the angular frequency, t is time, and φ is the phase angle. In this case, since the piston is at the center of its stroke and heading downward at t=0, the phase angle φ is 0.
The stroke of the engine is given as 0.0872 m, and since the piston is at the center of its stroke, the amplitude A is half of the stroke: A = 0.0872 / 2 = 0.0436 m.
Substituting the known values into the equation, we get:
y(t) = (0.0436) * cos(348.89t)
c) The period (T) of motion is the time taken for one complete cycle of the motion. It can be calculated by dividing the angular frequency (ω) by 2π:
T = 2π / ω
Substituting the value of ω, we get:
T = 2π / 348.89 ≈ 0.01805 seconds
Learn more about angular frequency
brainly.com/question/33512539
#SPJ11
An object is thrown from the ground into the air at an angle of 35.0
∘
to the horizontal, If this object reaches a maximum height of 6.75m, at what velocity was it thrown? {2}
If this object reaches a maximum height of 6.75m. The object was thrown with an initial velocity of approximately 12.6 m/s.
To determine the initial velocity at which the object was thrown, we can use the kinematic equations of motion. The given information is as follows:
Angle of projection (θ) = 35.0 degrees
Maximum height (h) = 6.75 m
We need to find the initial velocity (v₀).
Let's break the initial velocity into its horizontal (v₀x) and vertical (v₀y) components.
v₀x = v₀ × cos(θ)
v₀y = v₀ × sin(θ)
At the maximum height, the vertical component of the velocity becomes zero (v_y = 0). We can use this information to find the time taken to reach the maximum height (t):
v_y = v₀y + g t
0 = v₀ × sin(θ) - g t
Solving for t:
t = v₀ × sin(θ) ÷ g
Using the kinematic equation for vertical displacement, we can find the time taken to reach the maximum height:
h = v₀y × t - 0.5 × g t²
6.75 = v₀ × sin(θ) × (v₀ sin(θ) ÷ g) - 0.5 g (v₀ sin(θ) / g)²
6.75 = (v₀² sin²(θ)) ÷ (2 g)
Now, let's solve this equation for v₀:
v₀ = [tex]\sqrt{((2 * g * h) / Sin^{2} theta}[/tex]
where g is the acceleration due to gravity (approximately 9.8 m/s²).
Substituting the given values:
v₀ = [tex]\sqrt{((2 * 9.8 * 6.75) / Sin^{2} (35.0))}[/tex]
Calculating the result:
v₀ ≈ 12.6 m/s
Therefore, the object was thrown with an initial velocity of approximately 12.6 m/s.
Learn more about velocity here:
https://brainly.com/question/18084516
#SPJ11
Determine if angular momentum is conserved in each of the six collisions. If not, provide an appropriate explanation of why it is not conserved. (Make sure to consider uncertainties in your analysis.) 3. Clockwise Bottom disk Wi = 0 Top disk Wi = 7.347 rad/ Clockwise Bottomisk Wi= 2.081 rad/s Topdisk Wi= 6.510 rad/s Clockwise Bottom Wi= 0-8662 radls Counter clockwise TOP disk Wi= 7.428 rad/s Wf: 3.636 rad/s Wf: 3.645 rad/s Wf = 4.213 rad/s W f = 4.230 rad/s W: 3.200 rad /s Wf 3.216 rad/s clockwise Bottom disk Wi = 0 Top disk Wi= 12.55 rad clockwise (2) Bottom disk Wi= 1.149 rad Top disk Wi= 5.129 rad 3 Clockwise Bottom Wi= 2.894 radls disk Counter clockunse TOPAK Wi 8.723 radls Wf: 0.00407 Wf 12.45 rad Wf = 1.171 rad W = 5.083 rad 0.0724 W = 2.874 radls W₁= 8-583 rad/s disk. Sted DISK BOHom R: 65.15 mm W: 134 mm M: 1395.5g Steel DISK Top R: 61 mm W: 139 mm M: 1357-2g Aluminum R: 624pm W: 13.9 mm M: 465.9g
Due to incomplete or insufficient information provided, it is not possible to determine if angular momentum is conserved in the given collisions.
To determine if angular momentum is conserved in each of the six collisions, we need to analyze the initial and final angular momentum values for each collision scenario. The angular momentum of an object can be calculated using the formula L = Iω, where L is the angular momentum, I is the moment of inertia, and ω is the angular velocity.
However, the data provided seems to be incomplete or improperly formatted, making it difficult to understand the specific scenarios and the associated uncertainties. The information provided includes values for initial and final angular velocities (Wi and Wf), but there is no mention of the moment of inertia (I) for any of the objects involved in the collisions. Additionally, the data includes measurements for the radius (R), width (W), and mass (M) of various disks, but these values are not directly relevant to determining angular momentum conservation.
To accurately determine if angular momentum is conserved, we need information about the moment of inertia for each object involved in the collisions. Without this crucial information, it is not possible to provide a comprehensive analysis of the conservation of angular momentum in the given scenarios.
To properly address the question and provide an accurate analysis, it would be helpful to have a clear description of the objects involved, their moment of inertia values, and a precise explanation of each collision scenario.
learn more about Angular momentum conservation.
brainly.com/question/1597483
#SPJ11
The inductance of a closely packed coil of N turns is 2.0 ml. The magnetic flux through the coil is 1 uwb when the current is 20 mA. The number of turns N is a) 10 b) 20 c) 30 d) 40 e) 50
The number of turns N in the closely packed coil is d) 40, according to the given parameters.
To determine the number of turns N in the closely packed coil, we can use the formula for inductance:
L = (μ₀ * N² * A) / l,
where L is the inductance, μ₀ is the permeability of free space, N is the number of turns, A is the cross-sectional area, and l is the length of the coil.
Given that the inductance is 2.0 mH (millihenries), or 2.0 × 10⁻³ H, and the magnetic flux is 1 μWb (microweber), or 1 × 10⁻⁶ Wb, we can rearrange the formula:
N² = (L * l) / (μ₀ * A),
N² = (2.0 × 10⁻³ H * 1 × 10⁻⁶ Wb) / (4π × 10⁻ ⁷ H/m * A).
Since the units of H and Wb cancel out, we're left with:
N² = 5π * A,
where A is the cross-sectional area.
Now, we're given the current of 20 mA (milliamperes), or 20 × 10⁻³ A. The magnetic flux through the coil is given by:
Φ = L * I,
1 × 10⁻⁶ Wb = (2.0 × 10⁻³ H) * (20 × 10⁻³ A),
Simplifying, we find:
A = Φ / (L * I),
A = (1 × 10⁻⁶ Wb) / (2.0 × 10⁻³ H * 20 × 10⁻³ A),
A = 2.5 × 10⁻³ m².
Substituting this value back into the equation N² = 5π * A, we have:
N² = 5π * (2.5 × 10⁻³ m²),
N² ≈ 39.27.
Therefore, the number of turns N is approximately equal to the square root of 39.27, which is approximately 6.27. Since N must be a whole number, the closest option is 40 (d).
Learn more about Parameters
brainly.com/question/32612285
#SPJ11
Which of these best defines mass? A. the amount of space occupied by an object B. the distance between two points C. the quantity of matter in an object D. the interval between two events
The best defines mass is A. the measure of the amount of matter an object has.
The term is a fundamental concept in physics and is typically measured in kilograms. The amount of matter that an object has remains constant regardless of the location of the object. Mass is a scalar quantity and can never be negative. A mass that is moving is referred to as kinetic energy, it's also defined as a measurement of resistance to acceleration by a force. When the mass of an object is greater, it requires more force to move it.
On the other hand, if an object's mass is lower, it requires less force to move it. The concept of mass is important in various fields such as engineering, physics, and chemistry, and it's critical in explaining the fundamental principles of the universe. Hence, mass can be defined as A. the quantity of matter present in an object.
Learn more about mass at:
https://brainly.com/question/30282435
#SPJ11
An experiment is performed using a spring to determine its
constant. The mass is 0.0300kg and the period is 0.241s, what is
T^2?
T^2 is 0.05808099. The period of a spring-mass system is given by: T = 2*pi*sqrt(m/k). k is the spring constant.
The period of a spring-mass system is given by:
T = 2*pi*sqrt(m/k)
where:
m is the mass of the object
k is the spring constant
In this case, the mass is 0.0300 kg and the period is 0.241 s, so:
T^2 = (0.241 s)^2 = 0.05808099
Therefore, T^2 is 0.05808099.
To learn more spring constant click here
https://brainly.com/question/30393799
#SPJ11
A thin lens of focal length −12.5 cm has a 5.0cm tall object placed 10 cm in front of it. Where is the image located? 2.5 cm behind the lens 5.6 cm behind the lens 50 cm in front of the lens 50 cm behind the lens 5.6 cm in front of the lens
A thin lens of focal length −12.5 cm has a 5.0cm tall object placed 10 cm in front of it. The image is located 50 cm behind the lens. The correct option is D.
The image formed by a thin lens can be determined using the lens formula:
1/f = 1/v - 1/u
Where:
f is the focal length of the lens
v is the image distance from the lens (positive for real images on the opposite side of the object)
u is the object distance from the lens (positive when the object is on the opposite side of the lens)
Focal length (f) = -12.5 cm (negative sign indicates a diverging lens)
Object distance (u) = 10 cm
Substituting these values into the lens formula:
1/-12.5 = 1/v - 1/10
Simplifying the equation:
-0.08 = 1/v - 0.1
Rearranging the equation and calculating:
1/v = -0.08 + 0.1
1/v = 0.02
v = 1/0.02
v = 50 cm
The image is located 50 cm behind the lens.
Therefore, the correct answer is d. 50 cm behind the lens.
To know more about focal length, refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/2194024#
#SPJ11
If a hose is capable of creating 85 lbs of force at a 25 ft distance, what is its initial PSI?
A hose is capable of creating 85 lbs of force at a 25 ft distance. Its initial PSI is approximately 10.82 PSI on a 25 feet distance based calculation.
To determine the initial PSI (Pounds per Square Inch) of a hose based on the force it generates and the distance, we need to use the concept of work done by the hose.
The work done by the hose can be calculated using the formula:
Work = Force × Distance
Given that the force is 85 lbs and the distance is 25 ft, we can substitute these values into the equation:
Work = 85 lbs × 25 ft
Now, to calculate the initial PSI, we need to convert the units. Since work is equal to force multiplied by distance, we can express work in foot-pounds (ft-lbs).
To convert foot-pounds (ft-lbs) to inch-pounds (in-lbs), we multiply by 12, as there are 12 inches in a foot:
Work (in-lbs) = Work (ft-lbs) × 12
So, the equation becomes:
Work (in-lbs) = (85 lbs × 25 ft) × 12
Given that 2.31 feet of head is equal to 1 PSI, and the distance is 25 feet, we can calculate the equivalent PSI.
Pressure (PSI) = Distance (feet) / 2.31
Pressure (PSI) = 25 feet / 2.31
Pressure (PSI) ≈ 10.82 PSI
Therefore, the initial PSI of the hose, based on a distance of 25 feet, is approximately 10.82 PSI.
Learn more about PSI here:
https://brainly.com/question/14621647
#SPJ11
If a runner accelerates steadily at 0.04m/s^2 to a maximum speed of 18km/hr in the last 20m of a half marathon, what was their velocity before the acceleration began? how long will the acceleration take
If a runner accelerates steadily at [tex]0.04m/s^2[/tex] to a maximum speed of 18km/hr in the last 20m of a half marathon. The velocity before acceleration began was 4.84 m/s.The acceleration will take 4 seconds.
To find the initial velocity of the runner before the acceleration began, we can use the equation for uniformly accelerated motion:
[tex]v^2 = u^2 + 2as[/tex]
where v is the final velocity, u is the initial velocity, a is the acceleration, and s is the displacement.
Given:
Final velocity (v) = 18 km/hr = 5 m/s
Acceleration (a) = [tex]0.04 m/s^2[/tex]
Displacement (s) = 20 m
Substituting the given values into the equation, we can solve for the initial velocity (u):
[tex]v^2 = u^2 + 2as[/tex]
[tex](5)^2 = u^2 + 2(0.04)(20)[/tex]
[tex]25 = u^2 + 1.6[/tex]
[tex]u^2 = 25 - 1.6[/tex]
[tex]u^2 = 23.4[/tex]
[tex]u ≈ 4.84 m/s[/tex]
Therefore, the runner's velocity before the acceleration began was approximately 4.84 m/s.
To calculate the time it takes for the acceleration to occur, we can use the equation:
v = u + at
where v is the final velocity, u is the initial velocity, a is the acceleration, and t is the time.
Given:
Final velocity (v) = 18 km/hr = 5 m/s
Initial velocity (u) = 4.84 m/s
Acceleration (a) = [tex]0.04 m/s^2[/tex]
Substituting the given values into the equation, we can solve for the time (t):
v = u + at
5 = 4.84 + 0.04t
0.04t = 5 - 4.84
0.04t = 0.16
t = 0.16 / 0.04
t = 4 seconds
Therefore, the acceleration will take 4 seconds.
Learn more about acceleration here:
https://brainly.com/question/460763
#SPJ11
The orbit of a particle moving in a central force field f(r) is a circle passing through origin, namely the r(theta) = r_0cos (theta) theta elementof [-pi/2, + pi/2] where r is the distance from the center of force at theta = 0, i.e. the diameter of the circle. (a) Show that the force law is inverse-fifth power. (b) Assume that the angular momentum density of the particle at theta = 0 is l. Find the period of circular motion.
Given, The orbit of a particle moving in a central force field f(r) is a circle passing through origin, namely the r(theta) = r₀cos(θ), where r is the distance from the center of force at θ=0, i.e. the diameter of the circle.
(a) Show that the force law is inverse-fifth power.
(b) Assume that the angular momentum density of the particle at θ = 0 is l. Find the period of circular motion.
(a) We know that the force F(r) acting on a particle of mass m moving in a central force field is given by:
F(r) = (m v²)/rWhere, r is the radial distance, v is the tangential velocity, m is the mass of the particle.So, the centripetal acceleration of the particle of mass m moving in a central force field is given by: a = (m v²)/rOn the other hand, we know that the force field, F(r) is given by F(r) = -dV(r)/dr, where V(r) is the potential energy of the particle.Therefore, a = -dV(r)/dr ......(1)For a circular motion, a = v²/r, hence, we can write -dV(r)/dr = m v²/r = m (-dV(r)/dr)/r Simplifying, we get dV(r)/dr = -m v²/r²We know that the angular momentum of a particle is given by L = mvr, where m is the mass of the particle, v is its tangential velocity and r is the radial distance between the center of force and the particle.Therefore, v = L/mr and hence, v² = L²/m²r²Substituting the value of v² in equation (1), we get: dV(r)/dr = m*L²/m²r⁴ = L²/mr⁴ Therefore, the force field F(r) is proportional to r⁴. Hence, the force law is inverse-fifth power.
(b) For circular motion, we know that the centripetal force is given by:F = mv²/r and also F = -dV(r)/drTherefore, we can write mv²/r = -dV(r)/drSolving for v², we get:
v² = -1/m*(dV(r)/dr) rSince the angular momentum density of the particle at θ = 0 is l, we have L = mlr₀. Therefore, v = l/mr₀On substituting the values of v² and r in the above equation, we get:l²/mr₀² = -1/m*(dV(r₀)/dr) r₀Simplifying, we get dV(r₀)/dr = -l²/m³r₀³Therefore, the potential energy is given by: V(r₀) = -Gm²/4l²r₀Therefore, the period of the circular motion is given by:T = 2πr/v= 2πr₀/(l/mr₀) = 2πm/lAbout ParticleIn physics and chemistry, a particle or particle is a very small object with dimensions, which can have several physical or chemical properties such as volume or mass. What are particles?√ Definition of Particles, Characteristics, Types, and Examples | Chemistry An atom is made up of three subatomic particles, namely protons, neutrons, and electrons. Other particles also exist, such as alpha and beta particles.
Learn More About Particle at https://brainly.com/question/27911483
#SPJ11
Eileen, who is currently paying $1,080 per year in finance charges to her credit card company, wants a car that costs $9,000. How long would it have taken Eileen to save for the outright purchase of the car if she did not have any credit card debt and used the interest payments to save for the purchase of the car? Eileen can invest funds in an account paying 4% interest. To save for the outright purchase of the car, it would take Eileen years
It would take Eileen approximately 6.25 years to save for the outright purchase of the car if she used the interest payments from her credit card debt to accumulate savings.
To calculate the time it would take Eileen to save for the outright purchase of the car using the interest payments from her credit card debt, we need to consider the finance charges she pays and the interest she earns on her savings.
Given:
Finance charges paid per year = $1,080
Cost of the car = $9,000
Interest rate on savings = 4%
First, we need to determine how much Eileen can save each year by using the finance charges. This amount is equal to the finance charges paid per year, which is $1,080.
Next, we calculate the interest Eileen can earn on her savings each year. This can be calculated using the interest rate of 4% on her savings.
Now, we can calculate the number of years it would take Eileen to save enough to purchase the car outright by dividing the cost of the car by the savings she can accumulate each year.
Number of years = Cost of the car / (Savings per year + Interest earned per year)
Substituting the given values into the equation:
Number of years = $9,000 / ($1,080 + ($9,000 * 0.04))
To evaluate the number of years it would take Eileen to save for the outright purchase of the car, let's substitute the given values into the equation:
Number of years = $9,000 / ($1,080 + ($9,000 * 0.04))
Number of years = $9,000 / ($1,080 + $360)
Number of years = $9,000 / $1,440
Number of years ≈ 6.25 years
Learn more about interest payments here:-
https://brainly.com/question/23308373
#SPJ11
Consider a flat, matter dominated universe. What is the equation-of-state parameter? Use the Friedmann equations to derive an expression for the energy density in terms of the scale factor, and an expression for the scale factor in terms of time. First write down the relevant Friedmann equations.
In a flat, matter-dominated universe, the equation-of-state parameter for matter is given by: w = 0
The Friedmann equations describe the evolution of the scale factor and energy density in the universe. For a matter-dominated universe, the relevant Friedmann equations are:
H^2 = (8πG/3)ρ
2¨a/a = -(4πG/3)(ρ + 3P)
where:
H is the Hubble parameter, defined as the rate of expansion of the universe divided by the scale factor (H = ˙a/a, where a is the scale factor and ˙a is its time derivative).
G is the gravitational constant.
ρ is the energy density of matter.
P is the pressure of matter.
Since we are considering a matter-dominated universe, the pressure of matter is negligible compared to its energy density (P ≈ 0). Therefore, we can rewrite the second Friedmann equation as:
2¨a/a = -(4πG/3)ρ
To derive an expression for the energy density in terms of the scale factor, we can rearrange equation 1:
H^2 = (8πG/3)ρ
ρ = (3H^2)/(8πG)
Next, we can use the relation H = ˙a/a to express the Hubble parameter in terms of the scale factor's time derivative and the scale factor itself:
H = ˙a/a
Differentiating both sides with respect to time, we get:
˙H = (¨a/a) - (˙a/a)^2
Substituting this expression back into equation 2, we have:
2¨a/a = -(4πG/3)ρ
2[(¨a/a) - (˙a/a)^2] = -(4πG/3)ρ
Simplifying, we obtain:
¨a/a = -(4πG/3)(ρ + 3P)
Since P ≈ 0 for matter-dominated universes, we can write:
¨a/a = -(4πG/3)ρ
To learn more about equation-of-state parameter follow:
https://brainly.com/question/33247074
#SPJ11
A car traveling 70 km/h slows down at a constant 0.70 m/s^2 just by "letting up on the gas." Calculate the distance the car coasts before it stops. Express your answer using two significant figures. Part B Calculate the time it takes to stop. Express your answer using two significant figures. Calculate the distance it travels during the second second. Express your answer using two significant figures. Part D Calculate the distance it travels during fifth second. Express your answer using two significant figures.
To calculate the distance traveled during the fifth second, we can use the same equation and substitute a time of 5 seconds to find the distance traveled during the fifth second.
To calculate the distance the car coasts before it stops, we can use the equation:
distance =[tex](initial velocity)^2[/tex] / (2 * deceleration)
Given that the initial velocity is 70 km/h (which is equivalent to 19.4 m/s) and the deceleration is 0.70 [tex]m/s^2,[/tex] we can substitute these values into the equation to find the distance:
distance = (19.4 [tex]m/s)^2[/tex]/ (2 * 0.70 [tex]m/s^2)[/tex]
Calculate this expression to find the distance the car coasts before stopping.
To calculate the time it takes to stop, we can use the equation:
time = final velocity / deceleration
Since the final velocity is 0 m/s (as the car comes to a stop), we can substitute the deceleration of 0.70[tex]m/s^2[/tex] into the equation to find the time:
time = 0 m/s / 0.70 [tex]m/s^2[/tex]
Calculate this expression to find the time it takes for the car to stop.
To calculate the distance traveled during the second second, we can use the equation for uniformly decelerated motion:
distance = (initial velocity * time) - (0.5 * deceleration *[tex]time^2[/tex])
Since the initial velocity is 19.4 m/s and the deceleration is 0.70[tex]m/s^2,[/tex]we can substitute these values into the equation along with a time of 2 seconds to find the distance traveled during the second second.
To know more about velocity refer to-
https://brainly.com/question/30559316
#SPJ11
a particle moves along a vertical parabola y =1/2x^2 . At point A, the particle has a speed of 300 m/s, which is increasing at a rate of 0.7m/s^2. Determine the magnitude of acceleration at point A.
The particle moves along a vertical parabola y = 1/2x². So the magnitude of acceleration at point A is 300 m/s².
At point A, the particle has a speed of 300 m/s which is increasing at a rate of 0.7 m/s². To determine the magnitude of acceleration at point A, we can use the formula for acceleration:
a = √[(dy/dt)² + (dx/dt)²]
where dy/dt and dx/dt are the derivatives of y and x with respect to time t.
At point A, x = 0 and y = 0. Therefore,
y = 1/2x² = 0
Differentiating both sides with respect to time t, we get:
dy/dt = 0
At point A, the particle has a speed of 300 m/s which is increasing at a rate of 0.7 m/s². Therefore,
dx/dt = v = 300 m/s
Differentiating both sides with respect to time t, we get:
d(dx/dt)/dt = dv/dt = a
Therefore,
a = √(dy/dt)²+ (dx/dt)²]
= √[(0)² + (300)²] = 300 m/s²
So the magnitude of acceleration at point A is 300 m/s².
To know more about acceleration
https://brainly.com/question/460763
#SPJ4
