Answer:
Slavery was important in the Southern Colonies because.
Explanation:
Slavery was essential to the south because they had a year-long growing season and many crops to harvest. So they bought slaves.
How did William Penn religious beliefs impact the founding of Pennsylvania
Answer:
He was a Quaker and most people hated Quakers but he wanted Pennsylvania to be peaceful and allow people to religious rights because the other states/territories wanted to force religion upon people.
Explanation:
story about albert jones
Find the ebook online
Third parties differ from the two main political parties because third parties...
Have more official members
Have more political experience
Often focus on one, particular issue
Are older than the two main parties
Answer:
Have more political experience
All of the following are causes of apprehension except:
a. inexperience and lack of preparation
b. lack of confidence
c. negative past experiences
d. All of the above are causes of apprehension.
Answer:
its D
Explanation:
Inexperience and lack of preparation, lack of confidence and negative past experiences. All of the above are causes of apprehension. The correct option is d.
What is apprehension?Apprehension is a term applied to a model of consciousness in which nothing is affirmed or denied of the object in question, but the mind is merely aware of it.
Simple apprehension or conception can neither be true nor false. This distinction provides for the large class of mental acts in which we are simply aware of, or take in a number of familiar objects, about which we in general make no judgment, unless our attention is suddenly called by a new feature. Or again, two alternatives may be apprehended without any resultant judgment as to their respective merits.
Similarly, G.F. Stout stated that while we have a very vivid idea of a character or an incident in a work of fiction, we can hardly be said in any real sense to have any belief or to make any judgment as to its existence or truth.
Learn more about apprehension, here:
https://brainly.com/question/11874014
#SPJ7
HISTORY PLZ HELP! The Ancient alphabet is the Russian Cyrillic alphabet based off of the Greek alphabet.
Answer:
Read the explanation to see what the Cryillic alpahbet is.
Explanation:
The Cyrillic alphabet is closely based on the Greek alphabet, with about a dozen additional letters invented to represent Slavic sounds not found in Greek. In Russia, Cyrillic was first written in the early Middle Ages in clear-cut, legible ustav (large letters). Later a succession of cursive forms developed.
Hope this helped!
Answer:
Hope it helps :)
Explanation:
Cyrillic alphabet, writing system developed in the 9th–10th century CE for Slavic-speaking peoples of the Eastern Orthodox faith. It is currently used exclusively or as one of several alphabets for more than 50 languages, notably Belarusian, Bulgarian, Kazakh, Kyrgyz, Macedonian, Montenegrin (spoken in Montenegro; also called Serbian), Russian, Serbian, Tajik (a dialect of Persian), Turkmen, Ukrainian, and Uzbek.
Over the next several years the British would pass new taxes and laws and the colonists would protest and boycott British goods. These laws and taxes began to really create a divide between the Colonies and England. England saw the colonists as being ungrateful for their physical and economic protection while the colonists looked at it as if England was denying them of their rights.
Which of the following conclusions could be supported by the above reading selection?
a
There was only one event or law that caused the Colonist and English to dislike and distrust each other.
b
There were just a few events or laws that caused the Colonist and English to dislike and distrust each other.
c
There were many events or laws that caused the Colonist and English to dislike and distrust each other.
d
All of the above
e
None of the above
Answer:b
Explanation:
CAN SOMEONE HELP ME PLEASE
Direct democracy political system In the country where it exists 3 advantage and 3 disadvantage
Answer:
3 Pros of Direct Democracy
Full Government Transparency: Without a doubt, no other form of democracy ensures a greater degree of openness and transparency between the people and their government. Discussions and debates on major issues are held in public. In addition, all successes or failures of the society can be credited to—or blamed on—the people, rather than the government.
More Government Accountability: By offering the people a direct and unmistakable voice through their votes, direct democracy demands a great level of accountability on the part of the government. The government cannot claim it was unaware of or unclear on the will of the people. Interference in the legislative process from partisan political parties and special interest groups is largely eliminated.
Greater Citizen Cooperation: In theory at least, people are more likely to happily comply with laws they create themselves. Moreover, people who know that their opinions will make a difference are more eager to take part in the processes of government.
3 Cons of Direct Democracy
We Might Never Decide: If every American citizen were expected to vote on every issue considered at every level of government, we might never decide on anything. Between all of the issues considered by local, state, and federal governments, citizens could literally spend all day, every single day voting.
Public Involvement Would Drop: Direct democracy best serves the interest of the people when most people take part in it. As the time required for debating and voting increases, public interest and participation in the process would quickly decrease, leading to decisions that did not truly reflect the will of the majority. In the end, small groups of people—often with axes to grind—could control the government.
One Tense Situation After Another: In any society as large and diverse as that in the United States, what is the chance of that everyone will ever happily agree with or at least peacefully accept decisions on major issues? As recent history has shown, not much.
Explanation:
sorry if its to much, i just manage to find some good info
In Aryan society, who of the following shared power with the council?
Answer:rajas
Explanation: Raja
Sanskrit word for "king"; Rajas were leaders of Aryan communities and villagers and shared power with a council of village elders
When the Spanish decided to reoccupy Texas and establish more missions, what did they decide to include that they had not included in the past?
Answer:
The Spanish authorities decided in 1729 to abolish the presidio, Nuestra Señora de los Dolores de los Tejas, which protected the East Texas missions. The presidio near present-day Douglass was unnecessary, the government said, because of the peaceful demeanor of the Indians.
Explanation:
which of the following best describe what a guillotine?
Answer: A machine, originally from France, for cutting people’s heads off. It has a heavy blade that slides down a wooden frame.
Answer:
A guillotine is an apparatus designed for efficiently carrying out executions by beheading. The device consists of a tall, upright frame with a weighted and angled blade suspended at the top. The condemned person is secured with stocks at the bottom of the frame, positioning the neck directly below the blade.
Confucius believed that if people showed loyalty and respect within the family,
a.
China would become a world leader.
b.
a new king would be chosen.
c.
they would not obey their rulers.
d.
the same values would spread to society at large.
Please select the best answer from the choices provided
A
B
C
D
Answer:
I believe the answer is D.
Explanation:
Answer:it’s D, Confucius believed that if people showed loyalty and respect within the family, "the same value would spread to the society at large". Option D is the correct answer.
Explanation: Confucius was a Chinese philosopher and a politician. He was born on September 28, 551BC and died on April 11, 479BC.He developed a school of philosophy known as Confucianism. This school of philosophy emphasized on morality, correctness of social relationships, kindness, sincerity, and Justice. This school of philosophy was developed during the 6th to 5th century. He believed that if every member of a family will show loyalty and respect, the same loyalty and respect will be seen in every aspect of the society, because families are the smaller unite of the society, and every value you see people showcase in the society started from home
Contrast and compare written sources of history from non-written sources of history .
Answer:
Explanation:
The problem with non-written sources of history is that they are prone to a much greater rate of distortion than the written ones. Because everyone can change or misremember when speaking about the non-written history, but the written one is always there on paper in the same way it was when it was first written.
Answer:
Non-written sources are included with interviews, photos, recordings with music, clothing, buildings. But with Written sources these arctual, and factual inframtion, used in the form of a written text. Such as historians when reconstructing ancient, medieval and modern history. Some examples of written sources are about history, newspapers, or, diaries
Explanation:
In the 1500s, how did the Church of England differ from the Catholic Church
Answer:
I do not remember too much from 7th Grade World History, but I believe that the Angelicin Church (Church of England) was different from the Catholic Church because of the leader for both. The king ruled the Church of England while the pope ruled the Catholic Church. The Church of England also wanted to be different from the Catholic Church, and there was the reformation as well as Protestantism. I hope this helps!
B: The Church of England was led by a monarch, while the Catholic Church was led by a pope.
trust
how did the geographical size of the roman empire contribute to its decline and fall
HELP PLS!! ASAP!!
Explanation:
To keep this short, the empire was so large it became near to impossible to control the borders. As the empire became bigger, tribes were joined into it. People could no longer be one with roman culture and weren't reliable enough to defend the borders. While the borders were getting more vast and the lack of people to guard it - they were attacked by different places. This led to being unaware of dangerous attacks and with that, they weren't able to keep up. In other words, too much land and too few people.
Which of the answers below was an economic solution for housing British troops in the colonies?
Tea Act
Stamp Act
Declaratory Act
Quartering Act
Answer:
The Quartering act is the correct answer.
Explanation:
Which is the best definition of unalienable
Answer:
adjective. not transferable to another or not capable of being taken away or denied; inalienable: Inherent in the U.S. Constitution is the belief that all people are born with an unalienable right to freedom.
Explanation:
Whether it is written inalienable or unalienable- either is correct- the term means "not able to be taken away". Jefferson was pointing to the fact that those rights are “Natural Rights” that all humans have bestowed on them. This is a hallmark of Enlightenment philosophy.
Simplify the expression.
1+2⋅[(3+1)⋅5]
a. 23
b. 33
c. 41
d. 69
Answer:
C
Explanation:
[(3+1)*5] = [4*5] = 20
2*20 = 40
40+1 = 41
What qualities did Goerge Washington demonstrate
during the Battle of the Monongahela?
Answer:
Washington's leadership at the Battle of Monongahela helped save the remnants of Braddock's army. In the spring of 1755, a column of 2,100 British Regulars and 500 colonial militia commanded by Major General Edward Braddock, set out from Virginia to advance upon and take the French stronghold at Fort Duquesne.
What does the word "grievance" mean? (4 points)
a
Something that gets you money
b
Something that makes you happy
c
Something that makes you upset or sad
d
What happens when a country separates from another country
How did copper help mine legends develop?
Answer:
In ancient times learned how to obtain copper from the ore by heating the rock to the metal melting point. They used to mould bronze objects by pouring the metal into stone shapes or ingots.
Explanation:
Answer:
Exactly what the person above said, He is correct i am just supporting lol he took the answer i was gonna say but hey it happens. he gets full credit for it!
Explanation:
Which of the following is NOT an international requirement for a nation-state to be recognized?
A.
The group must all speak the same language.
B.
The group must have its own bordered territory.
C.
The group must be recognized by other nation-states.
D.
The group must govern themselves.
Answer: A.
The group must all speak the same language.
The group must all speak the same language is NOT an international requirement for a nation-state to be recognized.
What is international law?
The set of laws, norms, and standards commonly acknowledged as binding between nations is known as international law, also known as International Ethics, public international law, and law of nations.
It sets normative norms as well as a shared conceptual framework for governments in a variety of areas, including war, diplomacy, trade, and human rights.
International law seeks to support the development of international relations that are stable, consistent, and well-organized.
Thus, option A, The group must all speak the same language. is correct
For more details about international law, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/18597093
In what ways were Tsar Nicholas and Vladimir Lenin similar in their leadership style?
Answer:
Well, first you'll have to identify themes of their rule.
Style of rule -
NII was obviously an autocrat (even though he, in theory anyway, had a representative body of the peoples, the Duma. But he hung onto his absolute rule with the Fundamental Laws (1905)), and Lenin had spoke alot of 'dictatorship of the proletariat,' both pretty absolute.
Repression (secret police, censorship) -
NII had the Okhrana, and tried to continue his father's 'Reaction.' Secret police for the purpose of preserving the status quo, keeping the Tsars in power.
Lenin's Cheka was far more efficient, and though the total amount of the Cheka's victims in the civil war are officially 12,000 and something(wiki it), historians widely believe this figure to be in excess 500,000. Lenin therefore could be judged as the worse of the two.
Reform -
NII - Illusory Reform (October Manifesto created the Duma, and as mentioned, this had no real authority), Stolypin's land reforms did almost nothing. Lenin issues the Workers Control Decree, and also the Bolshevik Land Decree - however these were only very temporary (before a return to a very authoritarian economic set-up (strict discipline etc). These therefore could also be judged as illusory.Similarities-
Both used concessions/reform in order to maintain control. Nicholas with the October Manifesto and the creation of the Duma and Lenin with the NEP to appease the SR's and the rightists of the Bolsheviks. They both 'backtracked' on the reforms however with Lenin calling the NEP a 'tactical retreat' and would've reverted it had he been alive and Nicholas made the 1906 constitution/ Fundamental laws which limited the Duma's powers and maintained his position as an autocrat.I need help with these it’s for my homework and I’ve been stuck for 2 hours.
After the Fall of Babylon, Ancient Mesopotamia was controlled by foreign powers. What is its lasting contribution to the world?
Mesopotamia's lasting contributions to the modern world are the: the wheel, the sailboat, irrigation canals, the plow, and cuneiform.
What 3 items were traded with Barbados and Great Britain?
8th grade SS
Answer:
Britain imported agricultural commodities, including sugar, tobacco and rice.
Which speech out of Corden's smithy speech and Obama’s yes we can speech is the most persuasive and why?
To answer this question, you should:
- write a short introduction explaining the purpose and context of each speech, and giving your brief answer to the essay question
- paragraph 1: compare the use of a specific persuasive device in both speeches, using evidence from each speech, and explaining the effect this evidence has on the relevant audience.
- paragraph 2: repeat the same structure as paragraph
You will not need to add a conclusion to this essay.
Your essay should be no more than 400 words
Include a thesis and support it with evidence from today’s class.
Was colonization overall good or bad for the New World?
WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST
Answer:
Explanation:
1. A thesis statement is a sentence that sums up the central point of your paper or essay. It usually comes near the end of your introduction. Your thesis will look a bit different depending on the type of essay you're writing. But the thesis statement should always clearly state the main idea you want to get across. Strong body paragraphs contain evidence that supports your thesis. Primary support comprises the most important points you use to support your thesis. Strong primary support is specific, detailed, and relevant to the thesis.
2.As Europeans moved beyond exploration and into colonization of the Americas, they brought changes to virtually every aspect of the land and its people, from trade and hunting to warfare and personal property. European goods, ideas, and diseases shaped the changing continent.
plz mark as brainliest
What is Plunkitt's view on the how political machines operate? How does he say they are affecting people?
Answer:
Plunkitt's view on how political machines operate is that "they look after their friends. They take care of the people close to them that they call friends."
Plunkitt says that they are not hurting people but rather they give opportunities to people to make honest graft"
Explanation:
The above excerpt is culled from George Washington Plunkitt's speech - Plunkitt Of Tammany Hall. George Washington Plunkitt was a senator and a Tammany philosopher. He delivered this his plain speech on practical politics from his rostrum - the New York County Court house bootblack stand.
In his speech, he spoke about how he made honest fortune from politics.
Once arriving to the U.S. many immigrants settled in the cities in enclaves. Which of the following best describes an enclave?
Answer:
an enclave is an overcrowded house or apartment
Explanation:
Answer:
(D)
Explanation:
An enclave is usually like where people are surrounded by people of other ethnicity's causing there to be a mix of ethnicities/cultures.
Can someone help me plz if anyone helps me out I’ll give u BRAINLIEST! ♥️. During this basic time period as European feudalism, feudalism was also in place in Japan. Research Japanese feudalism and compare it to the feudalism of Europe. How were the feudal systems similar? How were they different?
Answer:
(Note : This is a very crude explanation, just to provide a jist of the answer, various other points are missing.)
Explanation:
Feudal system was a socio-politic hierarchical system which primarily involved landholders renting large estates to tenants, to be worked on by peasants / serfs, in exchange for a fee and other services.
Timeline :
Europe - Began in 800 CE
Japan - Began in 1200 CE
Similarities :
(I) Social Hierarchy : (Ownership of Land formed the basis of the social structure)
Europe
→ King
→ Lords (Nobles)
→ knights
→ Peasants and Serfs
Japan
→ Emperor
→ Shogun and Daimyo
→ Samurai
→ Peasants and artisans
→ Merchants
(II) Both were Agrarian Economies
Peasants and Serfs worked for landowners (Lords in Europe and Daimyo in Japan)
(III) Knights and Samurai were loyal to their Lords, Daimyo respectively, rather than the king.
(IV) Knights, Samurai followed a strict of Code of Chivalry, Brushido respectively, which involved values like protecting those beneath them, loyalty to their Lords, bravery, kindness, etc.
Dissimilarities :
(I) Religion :
→ European feudal system was based on Christianity (mainly Catholic)
→ Japanese feudal system was based on Buddhism.
(II) Distribution of Power:
→ In Europe, the distribution of power was centralised, resulting in Hierarchy of powers from the King to Lords, Barons, Church, etc.
→ In Japan, the distribution of power was decentralised,which resulted in actual powers resting with wealthy landowners, rather than the Emperor.
(III) Status of Women :
→ In Europe, women were expected to be timid, submissive, shy and docile, and be trained in household activities like cooking, sewing, looking after children, etc and stay at home. They had no say in marriage and were properties of fathers and then husbands.
→ In Japan, women had more social freedom. They could inherit lands, be trained in marital arts, etc. Samurai women were expected to be as strong as a man.
Answer:
Japanese feudalism was based on Buddhism, and the feudalism in Europe was based on Christianity. In Japan the power was very spread with it mostly being in the landowners. Meanwhile the power in Europe was given to the Lords and the Churches. The women in Europe were supposed to take care of the house and were "controlled" by their husbands. On the other hand in Japan women had a social life and were able to train in activities like martial arts and become as strong as men. Europe and Japan were both Agrarian Economies, land owners had peasants and serfs work for them. The Lords had Knights Samurai who were very loyal to them.
Explanation:
I had this question and this is what I wrote
