The fundamental theorem of calculus states that the integral of a function is the antiderivative of that function plus a constant. This means that if we know the antiderivative of a function, we can find the definite integral of that function
This can be done by evaluating the antiderivative at the upper and lower limits of integration.
In this case, we are asked to find the definite integrals of two functions:
a. f(x) = x + 1 + 2
b. g(x) = 3x^3 - 2x^2 + 4
The antiderivatives of these functions are:
a. F(x) = x^2 + x + 2x + C
b. G(x) = x^4 - x^3 + 2x^2 + C
where C is an arbitrary constant.
Therefore, the definite integrals of these functions are:
a. F(b) - F(a) = (b^2 + b + 2b) - (a^2 + a + 2a)
b. G(b) - G(a) = (b^4 - b^3 + 2b^2) - (a^4 - a^3 + 2a^2)
where b and a are the upper and lower limits of integration.
The fundamental theorem of calculus is a powerful tool that can be used to find definite integrals. By using the antiderivative of a function, we can evaluate the definite integral of that function without having to actually integrate it. This can be a significant time saver, especially for integrals that are difficult to integrate.
The fundamental theorem of calculus can also be used to find indefinite integrals. An indefinite integral is an expression that represents the area under the graph of a function between two points. The fundamental theorem of calculus states that the indefinite integral of a function is the antiderivative of that function plus an arbitrary constant. This means that we can find the indefinite integral of a function by adding an arbitrary constant to the antiderivative of that function.
The fundamental theorem of calculus is a fundamental result in calculus that has many important applications. It is used in a wide variety of areas, including physics, engineering, and economics.
Learn more about fundamental theorem here:
brainly.com/question/30761130
#SPJ11
Consider f(x) = 3x-1 In a delta-epsilon proof, delta would equal (d=?) O BE အ O E ဝ လ
The value of delta (d) cannot be determined based solely on the given function f(x) = 3x - 1. Additional context and requirements of the proof are needed to determine the appropriate value of delta.
In a delta-epsilon proof, delta represents the value of the small change in x (also known as the neighborhood or interval) that determines how close the input x needs to be to a specific value in order to guarantee that the function values f(x) are within a certain range of the desired output.
To determine the value of delta, we need to consider the specific requirements of the proof and the desired range for f(x). Let's assume that we want to prove that for any given epsilon (ε) greater than 0, there exists a delta (δ) greater than 0 such that if |x - c| < δ, then |f(x) - L| < ε, where c is a specific value and L is the desired limit.
In the case of the function f(x) = 3x - 1, let's say we want to prove that the limit of f(x) as x approaches a specific value c is L. In this case, we have f(x) = 3x - 1, and we want |f(x) - L| < ε for any given ε > 0.
To determine the specific value of delta, we need to manipulate the expression |f(x) - L| < ε and solve for delta. Since f(x) = 3x - 1, the inequality becomes:
|3x - 1 - L| < ε
To determine delta, we need to analyze the expression further and consider the specific value of L and the range for f(x). Without additional information, it is not possible to determine the exact value of delta. The value of delta will depend on the specific requirements of the proof and the behavior of the function f(x) in the vicinity of the point c.
To learn more about function visit;
brainly.com/question/12431044
#SPJ11
Q1 5 Points True or False x² + 8x Consider an integral S x²(x² + x + 1) When we try to integrate, it can be put in the form fractions method. True False 3x³ + 4x² 10 Ax + B x² + Cx + D x² + x + 1 because of partial
The answer is False. The integral cannot be put in the form of partial fractions because the denominator is not factorable. the denominator of the integrand is x² + x + 1, which is not factorable.
This means that the integrand cannot be written as a fraction of two polynomials, which is the requirement for partial fractions. The partial fractions method is a method for integrating rational functions. A rational function is a function of the form p(x)/q(x), where p(x) and q(x) are polynomials.
The partial fractions method breaks down the rational function into a sum of fractions, each of which has a numerator that is a polynomial of a lower degree than the denominator. The integral of the rational function can then be found by integrating each of the individual fractions.
In order to use the partial fractions method, the denominator of the rational function must be factorable. In this case, the denominator of the integrand is x² + x + 1.
This polynomial is not factorable, which means that the integrand cannot be written as a fraction of two polynomials. Therefore, the partial fractions method cannot be used to integrate this function.
To know more about fraction click here
brainly.com/question/8969674
#SPJ11
The main net worth of senior citizens is $1,067,000 with a standard deviation equal to $483,000. if a random sample of 50 senior citizens is selected what is the probability that the mean net worth of this group is between $950,000 and $1,250,000?
The main net worth of senior citizens is with a standard deviation of If a random sample of 50 senior citizens is selected, the probability that the mean net worth of this group is between and can be calculated as follows .
Given, Sample size n = 50 Standard deviation Let be the sample mean net worth of 50 senior citizens. To calculate the probability that the mean net worth of this group is between and , we first need to calculate the z-scores of the given values.
The probability that the sample mean is between $950,000 and $1,250,000 can now be calculated using the standard normal distribution table or calculator.Using the standard normal distribution table, we find that Therefore, the probability that the mean net worth of a sample of 50 senior citizens is between $950,000 and $1,250,000 is 0.8893 or approximately 88.93%.
To know more about standard deviation visit :
https://brainly.com/question/3589540
#SPJ11
Let the conditional pdf of X1 given X2=x2 be f(x1∣x2)=c1x1/x^2 2 for 0
The conditional probability density function (pdf) of X1 given X2 = x2 is f(x1∣x2) = c1x1/x2^2 for 0 < x1 < x2, where c1 is a constant.
The conditional pdf f(x1∣x2) represents the probability density of the random variable X1 given that X2 takes the value x2. In this case, the conditional pdf is given by f(x1∣x2) = c1x1/x2^2 for 0 < x1 < x2.
To determine the constant c1, we need to ensure that the integral of f(x1∣x2) over its entire range is equal to 1. Integrating f(x1∣x2) with respect to x1 from 0 to x2, we have:
∫(0 to x2) c1x1/x2^2 dx1 = c1/x2^2 * [x1^2/2] (evaluated from 0 to x2) = c1/2.
Setting this equal to 1, we find c1 = 2/x2^2.
Therefore, the conditional pdf of X1 given X2 = x2 is f(x1∣x2) = (2/x2^2) * x1/x2^2 for 0 < x1 < x2.
Learn more about probability here: brainly.com/question/31828911
#SPJ11
In 2001, the mean household expenditure for energy was $1493, according to data obtained from the U.S. Energy Information Administration. An economist wanted to know whether this amount has changed significantly from its 2001 level. In a random sample of 35 households, he found the sample mean to be $1618 and the sample standard deviation to be $321. Test the claim that the mean expenditure has changed siginificanlty from the 2001 level at the 0.05 level of significance. State your conclusion
[tex]The null hypothesis is: $H_0: μ = 1493$, which is the same as the mean household expenditure for energy in 2001.[/tex]
[tex]The alternative hypothesis is: $H_1: μ ≠ 1493$,[/tex] which means the mean household expenditure for energy has changed significantly from its 2001 level at the 0.05 level of significance.
The level of significance is 0.05.
[tex]The degrees of freedom are: $df = n - 1 = 35 - 1 = 34$.[/tex]
The critical value for a two-tailed test is obtained from the t-distribution table or from [tex]calculator: $t_{0.025, 34} = 2.032$.[/tex]
[tex]The test statistic is calculated by:$$t = \frac{\bar{x} - μ}{\frac{s}{\sqrt{n}}} = \frac{1618 - 1493}{\frac{321}{\sqrt{35}}} = 3.45$$[/tex]
[tex]Since the calculated value of the test alternative hypothesis is: $H_1: μ ≠ 1493$, t is greater than the critical value $t_{0.025, 34}$,[/tex]
we reject the null hypothesis $H_0$.
Therefore, we conclude that there is sufficient evidence to suggest that the mean household expenditure for energy has changed significantly from its 2001 level at the 0.05 level of significance.
To know more about the word significance visits :
https://brainly.com/question/28073266
#SPJ11
The EPA wants to test a randomly selected sample of n water specimens and estimate the mean daily rate of pollution produced by a mining operation. If the EPA wants a 98% confidence interval with a bound of error of 1 milligram per liter (mg/L), how many water specimens are required in the sample? Assume prior knowledge indicates that pollution readings in water samples taken during a day have been approximately normally distributed with a standard deviation of 5.6 (mg/L).
The required sample size is 171 water specimens.
To determine the required sample size for estimating the mean daily rate of pollution with a 98% confidence interval and a bound of error of 1 mg/L, we can use the formula:
n = (Z * σ / E)²
Where:
n = required sample size
Z = Z-score corresponding to the desired confidence level (98% corresponds to a Z-score of 2.33)
σ = standard deviation of the population (given as 5.6 mg/L)
E = bound of error (given as 1 mg/L)
Plugging in the values:
n = (2.33 * 5.6 / 1)²
n = (13.048 / 1)²
n ≈ 13.048²
n ≈ 170.38
Since the sample size must be a whole number, we round up to the nearest integer to ensure that the bound of error is not exceeded. Therefore, the required sample size is 171 water specimens.
To learn about confidence intervals here:
https://brainly.com/question/20309162
#SPJ11
A random variable is normally distributed with the mean of
$450.00 and standard deviation of $48. Determine the standard error
of the sampling distribution of the mean samples with n = 64
The standard error of the random variable is 6 .
Given,
Mean = $450
Standard deviation = $48
Samples = 64
Now,
According to the formula of standard error,
Standard error (SE) = σ / √(n)
σ = 48
n = 64
SE = 48 / sqrt(64)
SE = 6
Thus
standard error of the sampling distribution of the mean samples are 6.
Know more about standard error,
https://brainly.com/question/13179711
#SPJ4
The region bounded by y = 3/(1 + x²), y = 0, x = 0 and x = line x = 8. Using cylindrical shells, set up an integral for the volume of the resulting solid. The limits of integration are: a = b= and the function to be integrated is: = 8 is rotated about the
To find the volume using cylindrical shells, we integrate the product of the circumference and height of each shell. The integral setup is V = 2π [3ln(65) - 8arctan(8)].
To set up the integral for the volume of the solid using cylindrical shells, we consider infinitesimally thin cylindrical shells stacked along the x-axis. Each shell has a radius of x - 8 (distance from the line of rotation) and a height equal to the function y = 3/(1 + x²).
The volume of each cylindrical shell can be approximated as the product of its circumference and height. The circumference of a shell at position x is 2π(x - 8), and the height is y = 3/(1 + x²).
To find the volume, we integrate the product of the circumference and height over the interval [0, 8]:
V = ∫[0,8] 2π(x - 8) * (3/(1 + x²)) dx
Simplifying the expression, we have:
V = 2π ∫[0,8] (3(x - 8))/(1 + x²) dx
Integrating the expression, we get:
V = 2π [3ln(1 + x²) - 8arctan(x)] |[0,8]
Evaluating the integral from 0 to 8, we substitute the upper and lower limits:
V = 2π [(3ln(1 + 8²) - 8arctan(8)) - (3ln(1 + 0²) - 8arctan(0))]
Simplifying further, we have:
V = 2π [3ln(65) - 8arctan(8)]
Hence, the integral setup for the volume of the solid obtained by rotating the region is V = 2π [3ln(65) - 8arctan(8)].
To learn more about cylindrical shells click here: brainly.com/question/32139263
#SPJ11
Suppose there are two slot-machines. When playing one of them, you win with probability p and while playing the other you win with probability q, where 0
A discrete probability distribution is a probability distribution that lists each possible value a random variable can assume, together with its probability. The two conditions that determine a probability distribution are:
The probability of each value must be between 0 and 1, inclusive.
The sum of the probabilities of all values must be equal to 1.
A random variable is a variable that can take on a finite or countable number of values. For example, the number of heads that come up when you flip a coin is a random variable. The possible values of the random variable are 0 and 1, and the probability of each value is 0.5.
A probability distribution is a function that describes the probability of each possible value of a random variable. For example, the probability distribution for the number of heads that come up when you flip a coin is:
P(0 heads) = 0.5
P(1 head) = 0.5
The two conditions that determine a probability distribution ensure that the probabilities are consistent and that they add up to 1. This means that the probabilities represent all of the possible outcomes and that they are all equally likely.
The correct answer is B. A discrete probability distribution lists each possible value a random variable can assume, together with its probability.
Here are some examples of discrete probability distributions:
The probability of rolling a 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, or 6 on a standard die.
The probability of getting heads or tails when you flip a coin.
The probability of getting a multiple of 3 when you roll a standard die.
Discrete probability distributions are used in a wide variety of applications, such as gambling, statistics, and finance.
Learn more about random variable here:
brainly.com/question/30789758
#SPJ11
The average amount of money spent for lunch per person in the college cafeteria is $7.4 and the standard deviation is $2.85. Suppose that 7 randomly selected lunch patrons are observed. Assume the distribution of money spent is normal, and round all answers to 4 decimal places where possible. 2.85 a. What is the distribution of X? X - N 7.4 b. What is the distribution of ? - N 7.4 1.0772 c. For a single randomly selected lunch patron, find the probability that this patron's lunch cost is between $8.7642 and $10.1828. d. For the group of 7 patrons, find the probability that the average lunch cost is between $8.7642 and $10.1828. e. For part d), is the assumption that the distribution is normal necessary? No Yes
a) The distribution of X is normal, denoted as X N(7.4, 2.85).
b) The distribution of the sample mean, denoted asX, is also normal with the same mean but a standard deviation equal to the population standard deviation divided by the square root of the sample size. Therefore,X N(7.4, 2.85/√7) = N(7.4, 1.0772).
c) The probability that a single lunch patron's cost is between $8.7642 and $10.1828 can be found by converting these values to Z-scores: Z1 = (8.7642 - 7.4) / 2.85 = 0.4782 and Z2 = (10.1828 - 7.4) / 2.85 = 0.9731. Using a Z-table or calculator, the probability is approximately P(0.4782 < Z < 0.9731).
d) For the group of 7 patrons, the average lunch cost (X) follows a normal distribution with a mean of 7.4 and a standard deviation of 1.0772 (from part b). To find the probability that the average cost is between $8.7642 and $10.1828, calculate the Z-scores for these values: Z1 = (8.7642 - 7.4) / (2.85/√7) =1.7310 and Z2 = (10.1828 - 7.4) / (2.85/√7) =4.2554. Using a Z-table or calculator, the probability is approximately P(1.7310 < Z < 4.2554).
e) Yes, the assumption of a normal distribution is necessary for part d) as it relies on the Central Limit Theorem, which assumes that the distribution of sample means approaches normality as the sample size increases. Since the sample size is only 7, it is relatively small, but we still assume a normal distribution for the population in this case.
Learn more about standard deviation
https://brainly.com/question/29115611
#SPJ11
Let V, W be vector spaces and S ⊆ V. We define the nullifier of S as S ° = {T: V → W|T(x) = 0, ∀x ∈ S}. Show that:
a) S ° ≤ Hom(V, W).
b) if S1, S2 ⊆ V, and S1 ⊆ S2, then S °2 ⊆ S °1
a)S° is a subset of Hom(V, W), which means S° ≤ Hom(V, W). b) The set of linear transformations that nullify S2, denoted as S°2, is a subset of the set of linear transformations that nullify S1, denoted as S°1. Hence, S°2 ⊆ S°1.
a) The nullifier of a subset S of vector space V, denoted as S°, is a subset of the set of linear transformations from V to W, Hom(V, W). Therefore, S° is a subset of Hom(V, W), which means S° ≤ Hom(V, W).
b) If S1 is a subset of S2, then any linear transformation T in S°2 should also satisfy the condition for S°1. This is because if T(x) = 0 for all x in S2, it implies that T(x) = 0 for all x in S1 as well since S1 is a subset of S2. Therefore, the set of linear transformations that nullify S2, denoted as S°2, is a subset of the set of linear transformations that nullify S1, denoted as S°1. Hence, S°2 ⊆ S°1.
a) shows that the nullifier of a subset S is a subset of the set of linear transformations from V to W, and b) demonstrates that if one subset is contained within another, the nullifier of the larger subset is a subset of the nullifier of the smaller subset.
Learn more about linear transformations here: brainly.com/question/13595405
#SPJ11
1)Jennifer invests $800 at 5.75%/a. What is the interest earned in 10 months?
(remember "time" must be converted to years and percent must be converted to decimals)
2) Irina has $3400 in her account, which pays 9% per annum compounded monthly. How much will she have after two years and eight months?
3) Larry’s account pays 4.35% per annum compounded annually. There is $7400 in the account. How much did he invest five years ago?
1) Jennifer earns $47.92 in interest after 10 months. 2) Irina will have approximately $4,249.35 in her account after two years and eight months. 3) Larry invested approximately $6,208.99 five years ago.
1) The interest earned by Jennifer in 10 months, we need to convert the time to years and the interest rate to a decimal. Since the interest is compounded annually, the formula to calculate interest is I = P * r * t, where I is the interest, P is the principal amount, r is the interest rate, and t is the time in years. Converting 10 months to years, we have t = 10/12 = 0.8333. Converting the interest rate of 5.75% to a decimal, we have r = 5.75/100 = 0.0575. Plugging in the values into the formula, we get I = 800 * 0.0575 * 0.8333 = $47.92.
2) To calculate how much Irina will have in her account after two years and eight months, we can use the compound interest formula A = P * (1 + r/n)^(n*t), where A is the final amount, P is the principal amount, r is the interest rate, n is the number of compounding periods per year, and t is the time in years. Converting two years and eight months to years, we have t = 2 + 8/12 = 2.67 years. Since the interest is compounded monthly, there are 12 compounding periods per year, so n = 12. Converting the interest rate of 9% to a decimal, we have r = 9/100 = 0.09. Plugging in the values, we get A = 3400 * (1 + 0.09/12)^(12*2.67) = $4,249.35.
3) To find out how much Larry invested five years ago, we can use the formula for compound interest A = P * (1 + r/n)^(n*t), where A is the final amount, P is the principal amount, r is the interest rate, n is the number of compounding periods per year, and t is the time in years. Since the interest is compounded annually, there is one compounding period per year, so n = 1. We know that A = $7400 and t = 5 years. We need to solve the equation for P. Rearranging the formula, we have P = A / (1 + r/n)^(n*t). Converting the interest rate of 4.35% to a decimal, we have r = 4.35/100 = 0.0435. Plugging in the values, we get P = 7400 / (1 + 0.0435/1)^(1*5) = $6,208.99. Therefore, Larry invested approximately $6,208.99 five years ago.
Learn more about compound interest : brainly.com/question/31217310
#SPJ11
If X(t) = A sin(wt + 0), where A and w are constants, and is uniformly distributed random variable in (-7, π), find the autocorrelation of {Y(t)}, where Y(t) = X² (t). Find the power spectral density of the random process {X(t)}, where X(t) = A cos(bt + Y) with Y is uniformly distributed random variable in (-1,1).
The autocorrelation of {Y(t)}, where Y(t) = X²(t), is R_Y(τ) = (A²/2) * cos(2wτ), and the power spectral density of {X(t)}, where X(t) = A cos(bt + Y), is S_X(f) = (A²/4) * [δ(f - b) + δ(f + b)], where A, w, and b are constants and δ denotes the Dirac delta function.
The autocorrelation of the random process {Y(t)}, where Y(t) = X²(t), can be found by calculating the expected value of the product of Y(t) at two different time instants. The power spectral density of the random process {X(t)}, where X(t) = A cos(bt + Y), can be determined by taking the Fourier transform of the autocorrelation function of X(t).
In summary, the autocorrelation of {Y(t)} is given by R_Y(τ) = (A²/2) * cos(2wτ), and the power spectral density of {X(t)} is S_X(f) = (A²/4) * [δ(f - b) + δ(f + b)], where R_Y(τ) is the autocorrelation function of Y(t), S_X(f) is the power spectral density of X(t), A is a constant amplitude, w is the angular frequency, b is a constant, and δ denotes the Dirac delta function.
1. Autocorrelation of {Y(t)}:
The random process {Y(t)} is obtained by squaring the values of the random process {X(t)}. Since X(t) = A sin(wt + φ), where φ is a random variable uniformly distributed in (-7, π), we can express Y(t) as Y(t) = A² sin²(wt + φ). The autocorrelation function R_Y(τ) is then computed by taking the expected value of the product of Y(t) at two different time instants, given by R_Y(τ) = E[Y(t)Y(t+τ)]. By evaluating the expected value and simplifying the expression, we obtain R_Y(τ) = (A²/2) * cos(2wτ).
2. Power Spectral Density of {X(t)}:
To find the power spectral density of {X(t)}, we need to determine the Fourier transform of the autocorrelation function of X(t), denoted as S_X(f) = F[R_X(τ)]. Given X(t) = A cos(bt + Y), where Y is uniformly distributed in (-1,1), we can express X(t) as X(t) = A cos(bt + φ), where φ = Y + constant. By evaluating the autocorrelation function R_X(τ) of X(t), we find that R_X(τ) is a periodic function with peaks at ±b. The power spectral density S_X(f) is then given by S_X(f) = (A²/4) * [δ(f - b) + δ(f + b)], where δ denotes the Dirac delta function.
Therefore, the autocorrelation of {Y(t)} is R_Y(τ) = (A²/2) * cos(2wτ), and the power spectral density of {X(t)} is S_X(f) = (A²/4) * [δ(f - b) + δ(f + b)].
To learn more about power spectral density click here: brainly.com/question/32715909
#SPJ11
1) Use implicit differentiation to find dy/dx of x³ y5+4x+2xy = 1.
The implicit differentiation of x³y⁵ + 4x + 2xy = 1 is dy/dx = [(-3x²y⁵ - 2y - 4) / (x³ + 2x)] / (x³y⁵ + 2x)
To find dy/dx of the equation x³y⁵ + 4x + 2xy = 1 using implicit differentiation, we differentiate both sides of the equation with respect to x.
Differentiating x³y⁵ + 4x + 2xy = 1 with respect to x, we get:
d/dx (x³y⁵) + d/dx (4x) + d/dx (2xy) = d/dx (1)
Now, let's differentiate each term separately:
For the term x³y⁵, we use the product rule:
d/dx (x³y⁵) = 3x²y⁵ + x³ × d/dx (y⁵)
For the term 4x, the derivative is simply 4.
For the term 2xy, we use the product rule:
d/dx (2xy) = 2y + 2x × d/dx (y)
And the derivative of the constant term 1 is 0.
Putting it all together, we have:
3x²y⁵ + x³ × d/dx (y⁵) + 4 + 2y + 2x × d/dx (y) = 0
Now, we need to find d/dx (y) or dy/dx, which is our desired result.
Rearranging the terms, we get:
x³ × d/dx (y⁵) + 2x × d/dx (y) = -3x²y⁵ - 2y - 4
To isolate dy/dx, we divide through by (x³ + 2x):
[x³ × d/dx (y⁵) + 2x × d/dx (y)] / (x³ + 2x) = (-3x²y⁵ - 2y - 4) / (x³ + 2x)
Now, we substitute dy/dx = d/dx (y) into the equation:
x³ × dy/dx × y⁵ + 2x × dy/dx = (-3x²y⁵ - 2y - 4) / (x³ + 2x)
Finally, we can solve for dy/dx:
dy/dx = [(-3x²y⁵ - 2y - 4) / (x³ + 2x)] / (x³y⁵ + 2x)\
To know more about differentiation click here :
https://brainly.com/question/32561290
#SPJ4
Let define S² as: S² = ²₁ (x₁ - x)² n-1. (=1 Provide the expectation of S²: E(S²)
The expectation of S², denoted as E(S²), can be calculated using the formula E(S²) = σ², where σ² represents the population variance.
In the given formula, S² represents the sample variance, x₁ represents an individual observation, x represents the sample mean, and n represents the sample size. The formula for S² is based on the sample variance calculation, which measures the dispersion or spread of a dataset.
The expectation of S², denoted as E(S²), is equal to the population variance, σ². The population variance represents the average squared deviation of the population values from the population mean.
Since the formula states that S² = σ² when the sample size is 1, the expectation of S² in this case is equal to σ².
To learn more about variance visit:
https://brainly.com/question/9304306
#SPJ11
Let A1, A2, and A3 be events with probabilities, 1/5, ¼ and, 1/3 respectively. Let № be the number of these events that occur. a) Write down a formula for N in terms of indicators. b) Find E(N).
The answer is:E(N) = 4/15
Let 1Ai be the indicator function of the event Ai and X = 1A1 + 1A2 + 1A3.
Then N = X1A1A2A3 andN=1A1+A2+A3−(1A1A2+1A2A3+1A3A1)+1A1A2A3(b)E(N)=E(1A1+A2+A3−(1A1A2+1A2A3+1A3A1)+1A1A2A3).
From linearity of expectation,E(N)=E(1A1)+E(1A2)+E(1A3)−E(1A1A2)−E(1A2A3)−E(1A3A1)+E(1A1A2A3)P(A1)=1/5,P(A2)=1/4, and P(A3)=1/3. Here,P(A1A2) = P(A1)P(A2) = 1/20,
P(A2A3) = P(A2)P(A3) = 1/12, and P(A3A1) = P(A3)P(A1) = 1/15.P(A1A2A3) = P(A1)P(A2)P(A3) = 1/60.
Substituting the given probabilities, we obtainE(N) = 1/5 + 1/4 + 1/3 − 1/20 − 1/12 − 1/15 + 1/60 = 4/15.
Therefore, the main answer is:E(N) = 4/15.
Let A1, A2, and A3 be events with probabilities, 1/5, ¼, and 1/3 respectively. Here, we can write a formula for N in terms of indicators and also, we can find the value of E(N).
To know more about indicator function visit:
brainly.com/question/17013100
#SPJ11
A composite wall consists of material A (thickness =15 cm,k A =10 W/m ∘ C ) and material B (thickness =20 cm,k B =16 W/m ∘ C ). The exposed surface of A is in contact with a hot fluid at 150 ∘ C (heat transfer coefficient =180 W/m 2∘ C ), and that of B is in contact with air at 38 ∘C (film coefficient =26 W/m 2∘C ). The mid-plane temperature of A (i.e. 7.5 cm away from the exposed surface) at steady state is measured to be 130 ∘C. (a) Is there any contact resistance at the junction of A and B ? If so, what is its magnitude? (b) Calculate the temperature jump at the interface. (c) If there was no contact resistance, by what per cent the thickness of slab A should have been increased to get the same heat flux (keeping the thickness of slab B unchanged)?
(a) Yes, there is a contact resistance at the junction of materials A and B. Its magnitude is 0.0384 m^2∘C/W.
(b) The exact temperature jump at the interface cannot be calculated without the surface area of the interface.
(c) If there was no contact resistance, the thickness of slab A should be increased to maintain the same heat flux, but the percentage increase cannot be determined without the surface area information.
(a) Yes, there is a contact resistance at the junction of materials A and B. Its magnitude can be determined using the equation for thermal resistance at the contact interface:
R_contact = (1 / h_interface) - (1 / h_A)
where R_contact is the contact resistance, h_interface is the heat transfer coefficient at the interface, and h_A is the heat transfer coefficient for material A. Substituting the given values:
R_contact = (1 / 26) - (1 / 180) = 0.0384 m^2∘C/W
(b) The temperature jump at the interface can be calculated using the equation:
ΔT_interface = Q / (h_interface × A_interface)
where ΔT_interface is the temperature jump, Q is the heat transfer rate, h_interface is the heat transfer coefficient at the interface, and A_interface is the surface area of the interface. As the area of the interface is not provided, we cannot calculate the exact value of ΔT_interface.
(c) If there was no contact resistance, the thickness of slab A would need to be increased to achieve the same heat flux. The heat flux (q) can be calculated using the equation:
q = (T_hot - T_cold) / (R_total)
where T_hot is the temperature of the hot fluid, T_cold is the temperature of the air, and R_total is the total thermal resistance of the composite wall. The total thermal resistance is the sum of the resistances of materials A and B and the contact resistance:
R_total = R_A + R_contact + R_B
To maintain the same heat flux, we can equate the two expressions for q and solve for the new thickness of slab A, denoted as t_A':
q = (T_hot - T_cold) / (R_A + R_contact + R_B)
q = (T_hot - T_cold) / (k_A × A_A / t_A' + R_contact + k_B × A_B / t_B)
where t_A' is the new thickness of slab A, A_A and A_B are the surface areas of materials A and B, and t_B is the thickness of slab B.
To solve for t_A', we rearrange the equation:
k_A × A_A / t_A' = q × (R_A + R_contact + R_B) - k_B × A_B / t_B
t_A' = k_A × A_A / (q × (R_A + R_contact + R_B) - k_B × A_B / t_B)
Substituting the given values and the previously calculated contact resistance:
t_A' = (10 × A_A) / (q × (0.15 + 0.0384 + 0.2) - 16 × A_B / 0.2)
Note: The values of A_A and A_B are not provided, so the final percentage increase in thickness cannot be calculated without that information.
To know more about thermal resistance and heat transfer, refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/33495792#
#SPJ11
The probability of flu symptoms for a person not receiving any treatment is 0.04. In a clinical trial of a common drug used to lower cholesterol, 42 of 967 people treated experienced flu symptoms. Assuming the drug has no effect on the likelihood of flu symptoms, estimate the probability that at least 42 people experience flu symptoms. What do these results suggest about flu symptoms as an adverse reaction to the drug?
The drug has no effect on the likelihood of flu symptoms, the probability that at least 42 people experience flu symptoms can be estimated using the binomial distribution. This is because the outcome of each trial is either "success" (flu symptoms) or "failure" (no flu symptoms), and the trials are independent of one another.
Let X be the number of people treated who experience flu symptoms. Then X has a binomial distribution with n = 967 and p = 0.04.
The probability that at least 42 people experience flu symptoms is given by:P(X ≥ 42) = 1 - P(X < 42)
We can use the binomial probability formula or a binomial calculator to find this probability. Using a binomial calculator, we get:P(X ≥ 42) ≈ 0.00013
This is a very small probability, which suggests that it is unlikely that at least 42 people would experience flu symptoms if the drug has no effect on the likelihood of flu symptoms.
These results suggest that flu symptoms may be an adverse reaction to the drug, although further investigation would be needed to confirm this.
To know more about binomial probability visit:
https://brainly.com/question/12474772
#SPJ11
Determine whether the existence and uniqueness of solution theorem implies that the given initial value problem has unique solution dy/dx=y^6+x^6, y(0)=6
The existence and uniqueness of solution theorem, also known as the Picard-Lindelöf theorem, states that if a differential equation satisfies certain conditions, then there exists a unique solution to the initial value problem.
The given initial value problem is:
dy/dx = y^6 + x^6, y(0) = 6.
To determine whether the existence and uniqueness of solution theorem applies to this problem, we need to check if the differential equation satisfies the conditions of the theorem. The conditions required for the theorem to apply are:
1. The function y^6 + x^6 is continuous on a region that contains the initial point (0, 6).
2. The function y^6 + x^6 satisfies a Lipschitz condition with respect to y.
Condition 1: The function y^6 + x^6 is continuous on the entire xy-plane, which includes the point (0, 6). Therefore, condition 1 is satisfied.
Condition 2: To check the Lipschitz condition, we need to compute the partial derivative of the function y^6 + x^6 with respect to y. Taking the derivative, we have:
d/dy (y^6 + x^6) = 6y^5.
The function 6y^5 is continuous for all values of y. Therefore, it satisfies a Lipschitz condition with respect to y, and condition 2 is satisfied.
Since both conditions are satisfied, the existence and uniqueness of solution theorem implies that the given initial value problem has a unique solution.
Visit here to learn more about Picard-Lindelöf theorem brainly.com/question/14643965
#SPJ11
Given A= [33] 5 and B = 45 -1 2. solve (AX) = B for X.
To solve the equation (AX) = B for X, where A is a 1x1 matrix [3] and B is a 3x1 matrix [4, 5, -1], we can use the inverse of matrix A. The solution for X is [4/3, 5/3, -1/3].
To solve the equation (AX) = B, we need to find the matrix X that satisfies the equation. In this case, A is a 1x1 matrix [3] and B is a 3x1 matrix [4, 5, -1].
To find X, we can multiply both sides of the equation by the inverse of A. Since A is a 1x1 matrix, its inverse is simply the reciprocal of its only element. In this case, the inverse of A is 1/3.
Multiplying both sides by 1/3, we get X = (1/3)B. Multiplying each element of B by 1/3 gives us the solution for X: [4/3, 5/3, -1/3].
Therefore, the solution for X in the equation (AX) = B is X = [4/3, 5/3, -1/3].
Learn more about matrix here : brainly.com/question/29132693
#SPJ11
Select the correct answer below: -[infinity] O 0 2 516 -5x² - 5x+7 lim x-[infinity] -6x³ - 4x² + 6x - 7 QUESTION 7. 1 POINT The rate in which the balance of an account that is increasing is given by A'(t)=375e^(0.025t). (the 0.025t is the exponent on the number e) If there was $18,784.84 dollars in the account after it has been left there for 9 years, what was the original investment? Round your answer to the nearest whole dollar. Select the correct answer below: O $14,000 O $14,500 O $15,000 O $15,500
The original investment in the account is $15,000. To find the original investment, we need to integrate the rate of change function A'(t) to get the accumulated balance function A(t).
Then we can solve for the original investment by setting A(t) equal to the final balance and solving for t.
Integrating A'(t) = 375e^(0.025t) with respect to t gives:
A(t) = ∫375e^(0.025t) dt
Using the integration rule for e^x, we have:
A(t) = 375(1/0.025)e^(0.025t) + C
Given that the final balance A(t) after 9 years is $18,784.84, we can set up the equation:
18,784.84 = 375(1/0.025)e^(0.025*9) + C
Simplifying the equation, we find:
18,784.84 = 15,000e^(0.225) + C
Solving for C, we have:
C = 18,784.84 - 15,000e^(0.225)
Substituting C back into the accumulated balance equation, we get:
A(t) = 375(1/0.025)e^(0.025t) + (18,784.84 - 15,000e^(0.225))
To find the original investment, we set A(t) equal to the initial balance:
A(t) = P
Solving for P, we find:
P = 375(1/0.025)e^(0.025t) + (18,784.84 - 15,000e^(0.225))
Plugging in t = 0, we can evaluate P:
P = 375(1/0.025)e^(0.025*0) + (18,784.84 - 15,000e^(0.225))
P ≈ $15,000
Therefore, the original investment in the account was approximately $15,000.
To learn more about integration rule click here: brainly.com/question/32525685
#SPJ11
The heights of children in a school can be assumed to follow a Normal distribution with mean 120 cm and standard deviation 4 cm. A child is selected at random. (a) Find the probability that the child's height is 113 cm or more. Three children are selected. (b) Find the probability that the heights of the first two children are 113 cm or more and the height of the third child is below 113 cm. Give your answer to 2 significant figures. In this question, 1 mark will be given for the correct use of significant figures.
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Given:
Mean height (μ) = 120 cm
Standard deviation (σ) = 4 cm
(a) To find the probability that a child's height is 113 cm or more, we need to calculate the area under the normal distribution curve to the right of 113 cm.
Using the standard normal distribution table or a calculator, we can standardize the value of 113 cm using the formula:
Z = (X - μ) / σ
Substituting the values, we have:
Z = (113 - 120) / 4 = -7/4 = -1.75
Looking up the standard normal distribution table, we find that the area to the right of -1.75 is approximately 0.9599.
Therefore, the probability that a child's height is 113 cm or more is approximately 0.9599.
(b) To find the probability that the heights of the first two children are 113 cm or more and the height of the third child is below 113 cm, we can assume that the heights of the three children are independent.
The probability that the height of each child is 113 cm or more is the same as the probability calculated in part (a), which is 0.9599.
Since the events are independent, we can multiply the probabilities:
P(First two heights ≥ 113 cm and Third height < 113 cm) = P(≥ 113 cm) * P(< 113 cm) * P(≥ 113 cm)
P(First two heights ≥ 113 cm and Third height < 113 cm) = 0.9599 * 0.9599 * (1 - 0.9599) ≈ 0.9218
Therefore, the probability that the heights of the first two children are 113 cm or more and the height of the third child is below 113 cm is approximately 0.9218, rounded to 2 significant figures.
This is the final solution.
To know more about probability refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/31828911
#SPJ11
8. Steel rods are manufactured with a mean length of 23.5 cm. The lengths of the rods are approximately normally distributed with a standard deviation of 0.7 cm. a) What proportion of rods has a length less than 22.9 cm ? b) Any rods that are shorter than 21.1 cm or longer than 24.7 cm must be discarded. What proportion of the rods will be discarded? c) What proportions of the rods are greater than 23.15 cm ?
Approximately 19.59% of the rods will have a length less than 22.9 cm. Approximately 4.39% of the rods will be discarded. Approximately 30.85% of the rods will have a length greater than 23.15 cm.
a) The proportion of rods with a length less than 22.9 cm, we can use the z-score formula and the standard normal distribution.
First, we calculate the z-score for 22.9 cm:
z = (x - μ) / σ
z = (22.9 - 23.5) / 0.7
z = -0.857
Next, we look up the corresponding cumulative probability in the standard normal distribution table. From the table, we find that the cumulative probability for a z-score of -0.857 is approximately 0.1959.
Therefore, approximately 0.1959 converting in percentage gives 19.59% of the rods will have a length less than 22.9 cm.
b) The proportion of rods that will be discarded, we need to calculate the proportion of rods shorter than 21.1 cm and longer than 24.7 cm.
First, we calculate the z-scores for both lengths:
For 21.1 cm:
z = (21.1 - 23.5) / 0.7
z = -3.429
For 24.7 cm:
z = (24.7 - 23.5) / 0.7
z = 1.714
Next, we find the cumulative probabilities for these z-scores. From the standard normal distribution table, we find that the cumulative probability for a z-score of -3.429 is approximately 0.0003, and the cumulative probability for a z-score of 1.714 is approximately 0.9564.
The proportion of rods that will be discarded, we subtract the cumulative probability of the shorter length from the cumulative probability of the longer length:
Proportion of rods to be discarded = 1 - 0.9564 + 0.0003 = 0.0439
Therefore, approximately 0.0439, converting in percentage gives 4.39% of the rods will be discarded.
c) The proportion of rods greater than 23.15 cm, we can use the z-score formula and the standard normal distribution.
First, we calculate the z-score for 23.15 cm:
z = (x - μ) / σ
z = (23.15 - 23.5) / 0.7
z = -0.5
Next, we look up the corresponding cumulative probability in the standard normal distribution table. From the table, we find that the cumulative probability for a z-score of -0.5 is approximately 0.3085.
Therefore, approximately 30.85% of the rods will have a length greater than 23.15 cm.
To know more about length refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/17207498#
#SPJ11
Kara George received a $15,500 gift for graduation from her uncle. If she deposits this in an account paying 5 percent, what will be the value of this gift in 11 years? Use Exhibit 1-A
The value of the gift in 11 years, when deposited in an account paying 5 percent, will be $26,781.99.
To calculate the future value of the gift, we can use the formula for compound interest:
Future Value = Present Value * (1 + Interest Rate)^Time
Given that the present value is $15,500, the interest rate is 5 percent (0.05), and the time is 11 years, we can plug these values into the formula:
Future Value = $15,500 * (1 + 0.05)^11
= $15,500 * (1.05)^11
= $15,500 * 1.747422051
= $26,781.99
Therefore, the value of the gift in 11 years, when compounded at an annual interest rate of 5 percent, will be approximately $26,781.99.
In this calculation, we assume that the interest is compounded annually. Exhibit 1-A might provide additional information, such as the compounding frequency (e.g., quarterly, monthly) or any other specific details about the interest calculation. It's important to note that compounding more frequently within a year would result in a slightly higher future value due to the effect of compounding.
Learn more about percent here:
brainly.com/question/31323953
#SPJ11
please solve it step by step i want to know how to multiply the
matrix with each other
11. Let R be the relation represented by the matrix 1 0 (1,2) (2,3) MR 0 (2/1)(2,2) Find the matrices that represent a) R². b) R³. c) R¹.
The matrices representing R², R³, and R¹ are:
R²: 1 0
(3,5) (3,5)
R³:
1 0
(7,11) (7,11)
R¹:
1 0
(1,2) (2,3)
The relation R is represented by the matrix:
1 0
(1,2) (2,3)
a) R² is obtained by multiplying R by itself:
1 0
(1,2) (2,3)
The result is:
1 0
(3,5) (3,5)
b) R³ is obtained by multiplying R² by R:
1 0
(3,5) (3,5)
The result is:
1 0
(7,11) (7,11)
c) R¹ represents the original relation R, so it remains the same:
1 0
(1,2) (2,3)
To find the matrices representing the powers of a relation, we multiply the relation matrix by itself for the desired power. In this case, R² is obtained by multiplying R by itself, and R³ is obtained by multiplying R² by R again. R¹ represents the original relation R, so it remains unchanged. The resulting matrices are obtained by performing matrix multiplication following the rules of matrix algebra.
Learn more about Matrix multiplication here: brainly.com/question/13591897
#SPJ11
According to a Gallup poll, 21% of American adults prefer saving over spending. A random sample of 20 American adults is selected. Assuming that the data follow a binomial probability model, what is the probability that 5 of them prefer saving over spending?
To find the probability that exactly 5 out of 20 American adults prefer saving over spending, we can use the binomial probability formula. The formula is P(X = k) = C(n, k) * p^k * (1 - p)^(n - k), where n is the sample size, k is the number of successes, p is the probability of success, and C(n, k) represents the number of combinations.
In this case, the sample size (n) is 20, the number of successes (k) is 5, and the probability of success (p) is 0.21 (as given by the Gallup poll). We can substitute these values into the binomial probability formula:
P(X = 5) = C(20, 5) * 0.21^5 * (1 - 0.21)^(20 - 5)
Calculating the combinations, we have C(20, 5) = 20! / (5! * (20 - 5)!) = 15504.
Substituting the values into the formula, we have:
P(X = 5) = 15504 * 0.21^5 * 0.79^15
Evaluating this expression will give us the probability that exactly 5 out of the 20 randomly selected American adults prefer saving overspending.
Visit here to learn more about probability : https://brainly.com/question/31828911
#SPJ11
(1 point) Given Find the derivative R' (t) and norm of the derivative. R'(t) R'(0)| Then find the unit tangent vector T(t) and the principal unit normal vector N(t) T(t) N(t) R(t) 6ti +3² + 4k
The derivative R'(t) can be found by differentiating the vector function R(t) element-wise.
That is, we differentiate each component function of R(t) separately with respect to t.R(t) = 6ti + 3t^2 + 4k
Taking derivative of R(t) with respect to t, we get:
R'(t) = (d/dt)(6ti) + (d/dt)(3t^2) + (d/dt)(4k) R'(t) = 6i + 6tj
The norm of the derivative is the magnitude of R'(t). That is, the norm of R'(t) = ||R'(t)|| = ||6i + 6tj||
We can use the Pythagorean theorem to find the norm of R'(t). That is, ||6i + 6tj|| = √(6² + 6²t²) = 6√(1 + t²)
To find the unit tangent vector T(t) and principal unit normal vector N(t), we first find the derivative R'(t) and the norm of R'(t) which is 6√(1 + t²).
The unit tangent vector T(t) is the normalized derivative vector R'(t)/||R'(t)||. That is,
T(t) = R'(t)/||R'(t)|| = (6i + 6tj)/(6√(1 + t²)) = i/√(1 + t²) + tj/√(1 + t²)
The principal unit normal vector N(t) is the normalized second derivative vector T'(t)/||T'(t)||.
We will differentiate T(t) to get the second derivative T'(t).T(t) = i/√(1 + t²) + tj/√(1 + t²)
Differentiating T(t) with respect to t, we get:
T'(t) = (-t/((1 + t²)^(3/2)))i + (1/((1 + t²)^(3/2)))j
The norm of T'(t) is ||T'(t)|| = √((t^2/((1 + t²)^3)) + (1/((1 + t²)^3)))
Now, we can get the principal unit normal vector by normalizing
T'(t).N(t) = T'(t)/||T'(t)|| = ((-t/((1 + t²)^(3/2)))i + (1/((1 + t²)^(3/2)))j)/√((t^2/((1 + t²)^3)) + (1/((1 + t²)^3)))
Thus, we have found the derivative R'(t) and the norm of the derivative. Using these, we found the unit tangent vector T(t) and the principal unit normal vector N(t) for the given vector function R(t) = 6ti + 3t^2 + 4k.
To know more about Pythagorean theorem visit:
brainly.com/question/14930619
#SPJ11
To test H0 p=0.35 versus H1 ;p>0.35, a simple random sample of n=300 individuals is obtained and x=69 successes are observed. (a) What does it mean to make a Type ll error for this test? (b) if the researcher decides to test this hypothesis at the a = 0.01 level of sgnificance. compute the probability of makin a type II eror. B if the true population propotion is 0.36. what is the power of the test?
(c) Redo part (b) If the true population proportion is 0.39. (a) What does it mean to make a Type Il error for this test? Choose the correct answer below. A. H0 is not rejected and the true population proportion is equal to 0.35. B. H0 is not rejected and the true population proportion is greater than 0.35. C. H0 is rejected and the true population proportion is greater than 0.35.
D. H0 is rejected and the true population proportion is less than 0.35.
(c) Redo part (b) If the true population proportion is 0.39.
A Type II error occurs when the null hypothesis H0 is not rejected when it should be rejected. It means that the researcher failed to reject a false null hypothesis.
In other words, the researcher concludes that there is not enough evidence to support the alternative hypothesis H1 when in fact it is true. It is also called a false negative error. (b) Level of significance a = 0.01 means the researcher is willing to accept a 1% probability of making a Type I error.
This gives us:[tex]β = P(Type II error) = P(Z < (2.33 + Zβ) / 0.0383) Power = 1 - β = P(Z > (2.33 + Zβ) / 0.0383)[/tex]Answers:(a) Option A. H0 is not rejected and the true population proportion is equal to 0.35.(b) Probability of making a Type II error: [tex]β = 0.1919[/tex]. Power of the test: Power = 0.8081.(c) Probability of making a Type II error: β = 0.0238. Power of the test:
Power = 0.9762.
To know more about Probability visit:
https://brainly.com/question/31828911
#SPJ11
proportion. (a) No prolminary estimate is available. Find the minimum sample size needed. (b) Find the minimum sample size needed, using a prior study that found that 40% of the respondents said they think Congress is doing a good or excellent job. (c) Compare the results from parts (a) and (b). (a) What is the minum sample size needed assuming that no prict information is arailable? n= (Rourd up to toe nearest whole rumber as needed) (b) What is the mirimurn samgle wize needed using a priar study that found that 40% of the respondents sad they think Congress is daing a good of exsellent job? n= (Round up io the nearest whole number as needed, ) (c) How do the results from (a) and (b) compare? A. Hawing an estimate of the copuaficn croportion rases the minum sample sire needed. B. Having an estrmale of the population proporticn has no effect on the minerum sample size needed. C. Having an estimate of the populahon proportion reducos the minimum sarrile sue neoded
(a) The minimum sample size needed is 384 when no prict information is available
(b) 370 is the minimum sample size needed using a prior study that found that 40% of the respondents sad they think Congress is doing a good of excellent job.
(c) Having an estimate of the population proportion reduces the minimum sample size needed.
To calculate the minimum sample size needed for a proportion, we can use the formula:
n = (Z² × p × q) / E²
where:
n is the minimum sample size needed,
Z is the Z-score corresponding to the desired level of confidence,
p is the estimated proportion of the population,
q is 1 - p (complement of p),
E is the desired margin of error.
(a) Since no preliminary estimate is available, we can use a conservative estimate of p = 0.5 (assuming maximum variability).
Let's assume a desired margin of error E = 0.05 and a 95% confidence level (Z = 1.96).
n = (1.96² × 0.5 × 0.5) / 0.05²
= 384
Therefore, the minimum sample size needed is 384.
(b)
Using the estimate from a prior study that found 40% of respondents think Congress is doing a good or excellent job, we can plug in p = 0.4 into the formula.
Let's assume the same desired margin of error E = 0.05 and a 95% confidence level (Z = 1.96).
n = (1.96² × 0.4×0.6) / 0.05²
= 369.6
(c) We assume the most conservative scenario, which is p = 0.5.
This assumption maximizes the variability and requires a larger sample size to achieve a desired level of precision.
In other words, without any prior information, we need a larger sample to ensure we capture the true proportion accurately.
When we have a prior estimate of the population proportion (part b), we can use that estimate in the calculation.
Since we have some information about the population proportion, we can make a more informed decision about the sample size needed.
This allows us to be more efficient in our sampling process and achieve the desired precision with a smaller sample size.
Hence, having an estimate of the population proportion reduces the minimum sample size needed.
To learn more on Statistics click:
https://brainly.com/question/30218856
#SPJ4
You are at the arena as an organizer for an event. When asked for availability of seats, you check to realize your section has 20 seats in row 1 available, 22 in row 2, 24 in row 3, 26 in row 4, and so on till row 35. What is the total number of seats available to book?
Identify the sequence (if any) and indicate first term, common difference/ratio and number of terms for the sequence along with evaluating the above problem. You do not have to simplify and compute your answer but clearly state the expression.
The total number of seats available to book in the given scenario, where each row has an increasing number of seats available starting from 20 and increasing by 2 seats per row, is 1890 seats.
The given problem describes an arithmetic sequence where each row has an increasing number of available seats.
To identify the sequence, let's analyze the pattern:
The first term (row 1) has 20 seats available.
The second term (row 2) has 22 seats available, which is 2 more than the first term.
The third term (row 3) has 24 seats available, which is 2 more than the second term.
The fourth term (row 4) has 26 seats available, which is 2 more than the third term.
From this pattern, we can see that the common difference is 2. Each subsequent term has 2 more seats available than the previous term.
Now, we can determine the number of terms. The highest row mentioned is row 35, so there are 35 terms in the sequence.
Therefore, the expression for the number of seats available in each row can be expressed as:
Number of seats available = 20 + (row number - 1) * 2
To find the total number of seats available to book, we need to sum up the terms of the sequence. Since the sequence is arithmetic, we can use the arithmetic series formula:
Sum of terms = (number of terms / 2) * (first term + last term)
In this case, the first term is 20 (row 1), the last term is 20 + (35 - 1) * 2 = 20 + 68 = 88 (row 35), and the number of terms is 35.
The expression for the total number of seats available to book is:
Total number of seats available:
= (35 / 2) * (20 + 88)
= 17.5 * 108
= 1890
To know more about total number,
https://brainly.com/question/1179123
#SPJ11
