Answer:
In 1898, the U.S. proposed an Open Door Policy to promote unrestricted trade with China
Use the cartoon and your knowledge of U.S. history to answer question 1.
This cartoon shows Lady Liberty listening to the stories told by U.S. prisoners of war (POWs) on their return from Vietnam. What can you infer from Lady Liberty’s tears?
A. the POWs were ill treated B. the POWs were healthy C. the POWs were poor
D. the POWs were wealthy
From the cartoon depicting Lady Liberty shedding tears while listening to the stories told by U.S. prisoners of war (POWs) returning from Vietnam, it can be inferred that the A. POWs were ill-treated.
From the cool animated film depicting Lady Liberty losing tears while taking note of the stories informed via U.S. Prisoners of Warfare (POWs) getting back from Vietnam, it could be inferred that the POWs have been unwell-dealt with. The tears of Lady Liberty represent empathy, sorrow, and pain, suggesting that the stories being shared were probably filled with money owed of suffering, mistreatment, and the hardships that persevered during their captivity.
During the Vietnam War, many POWs faced harsh situations, along with bodily and mental abuse, torture, and prolonged intervals of captivity. The emotional response of Lady Liberty in the cool animated film displays the deep impact and challenge for the properly-being of the returning POWs.
The tears represent the collective grief and outrage over the mistreatment and violation of the prisoners' rights, evoking an experience of sympathy and team spirit towards people who had persevered through such hardships throughout their provide.
The caricature conveys the inference that the U.S. POWs coming back from Vietnam have been unwell-dealt with, highlighting the significance of acknowledging their sacrifices and advocating for their rights and nicely-being.
To know more about POWs,
https://brainly.com/question/31307257
#SPJ4
The correct question is:
"Use the cartoon and your knowledge of U.S. history to answer question 1. This cartoon shows Lady Liberty listening to the stories told by U.S. prisoners of war (POWs) on their return from Vietnam. What can you infer from Lady Liberty's tears?
A. the POWs were ill-treated
B. the POWs were healthy
C. the POWs were poor
D. the POWs were wealthy"
true or false: by the late nineteenth century, the federal government in the united states was both modernized and powerful.
True. By the late nineteenth century, the federal government in the United States had undergone significant modernization and had become a powerful institution. This period is often referred to as the "Age of Reform," during which the federal government took on a more active role in regulating the economy, protecting workers' rights, and expanding its authority over the states. The government also embarked on a program of internal improvements, such as building railroads and improving transportation infrastructure, that further strengthened its power and influence.
Why did many whites want Native Americans to move west?
Many whites want Native Americans to move west and believed the removal policy was beneficial to the Indians. Most Native Americans thought that the United States would never extend beyond the Mississippi.
Native Americans are the Indigenous peoples of the United States mainland and Alaska (the Indigenous peoples of Hawaii and the US territories are typically referred to by other names). They are referred to as American Indians (or simply Indians), First Americans, and Indigenous Americans.
The term "Indian," which relates to the early inhabitants of the Native American continent, is said to have originated with the 15th-century sailor Christopher Columbus. Some contend that he used the phrase because he thought he had achieved his desired goal of reaching "the Indies" (Asia) at the time.
Learn more about the Native Americans here:
https://brainly.com/question/13794240
#SPJ4
in acient greece the system of government would change based off of which of the following
Answer:
In ancient Greece, the system of government would change based on the following factors:
City-State (Polis): Ancient Greece consisted of various independent city-states, each with its own government and political system. The type of government within each city-state could vary, leading to different forms of governance.
Political Reform Movements: Political reform movements and changes in societal dynamics could influence the government system. For example, the rise of democracy in Athens was a result of reforms and the influence of political figures such as Cleisthenes.
External Influences: External threats or conquests could prompt changes in the government system. The invasion of the Persian Empire, for instance, led to the formation of the Delian League, which had implications for governance and power dynamics among Greek city-states.
Political Upheavals: Internal conflicts, revolutions, or power struggles within a city-state could result in changes to the government system. Coups, overthrow of tyrants, or revolutions often led to alterations in the form of governance.
Influence of Philosophers and Thinkers: Philosophers and political thinkers like Plato, Aristotle, and others played a role in shaping political thought and the understanding of different government systems. Their ideas and writings often had an impact on the governance structures of ancient Greece.
Explanation:
Clarify Why did the North and the South have differing opinions on whether or not slaves should be counted as part of a state’s population?
The North and the South had differing opinions on whether or not slaves should be counted as part of a state's population due to their conflicting economic and political interests.
The North and the South in the United States had opposing views on the issue of counting slaves as part of a state's population for various reasons. In the North, where slavery was gradually abolished, there was a growing sentiment against considering slaves as population because it would grant more political power to the slaveholding states.
Since slaves were not granted citizenship or voting rights, counting them as part of the population would primarily benefit the Southern states in terms of representation in Congress.
On the other hand, the Southern states heavily relied on slavery as an essential part of their economy, particularly in agriculture. They argued for the inclusion of slaves in the population count to bolster their representation in Congress and maintain their influence over national policies, including the preservation of slavery.
By counting slaves as part of the population, the Southern states could increase their number of representatives in Congress and maintain a significant presence in the federal government.
learn more about population :
https://brainly.com/question/31598322
#SPJ4
Have a volunteer from the class write the following statement on the board: Working at a textile mill was a good opportunity for young women in the 1800s.
The factors that contributed to working at a textile mill being considered a good opportunity for young women in the 1800s include economic necessity and the availability of employment opportunities in the growing textile industry.
Textile mill refers to a manufacturing facility where textiles, such as fabrics and garments, were produced during the 1800s. These mills played a significant role in the Industrial Revolution, utilizing machinery and mass production techniques.
While employment at textile mills offered young women economic prospects and urban experiences, it also exposed them to demanding and often hazardous working conditions.
These conditions included long hours, low wages, cramped spaces, and exposure to pollutants, leading to health issues and the emergence of labor movements advocating for improved worker rights and safety standards.
Learn more about textile mill here:
https://brainly.com/question/2738979
#SPJ4
Most probably, your complete question is this:
What factors contributed to working at a textile mill being considered a good opportunity for young women in the 1800s?
Explain the importance of
• Louisiana Purchase • Sacagawea
• Meriwether Lewis • Zebulon Pike
• William Clark
Answer:
Louisiana Purchase: The Louisiana Purchase was a significant event in American history that took place in 1803. It involved the acquisition of a vast territory in North America by the United States from France. The territory, which spanned from the Mississippi River to the Rocky Mountains and doubled the size of the United States, was purchased for $15 million. The Louisiana Purchase had several important implications. It provided the United States with strategic control over the Mississippi River and the port of New Orleans, securing vital trade routes and expanding westward expansion. The acquisition also opened up new opportunities for exploration, settlement, and economic development, paving the way for the expansion of the United States as a continental nation.
Sacagawea: Sacagawea was a Shoshone woman who played a crucial role as a guide and interpreter during the Lewis and Clark expedition. In 1804, Meriwether Lewis and William Clark led an expedition commissioned by President Thomas Jefferson to explore the newly acquired western territories and find a navigable route to the Pacific Ocean. Sacagawea, along with her husband Toussaint Charbonneau, joined the expedition as interpreters and guides. Sacagawea's knowledge of the terrain, her ability to communicate with Native American tribes, and her familiarity with the land and resources were invaluable to the success of the expedition. Her presence also helped to establish a peaceful encounter with various Native American groups they encountered along the way. Sacagawea's contributions to the Lewis and Clark expedition have made her an important figure in American history and a symbol of female strength and resilience.
Meriwether Lewis: Meriwether Lewis was an American explorer and leader of the Lewis and Clark expedition. In 1803, President Thomas Jefferson appointed Lewis as his private secretary and later selected him to lead an expedition to explore the newly acquired western territories. Lewis was responsible for organizing and leading the expedition, making scientific observations, mapping the route, and establishing relations with Native American tribes. The expedition, known as the Corps of Discovery, played a crucial role in expanding American knowledge of the western territories, documenting the flora, fauna,
Draw Conclusions What lasting gains did African Americans make during Reconstruction?
During the Reconstruction period following the American Nationwide conflict (1865-1877), African Americans took huge steps towards accomplishing political, social, and monetary additions.
While these additions were in the end moved back during the ensuing time of Jim Crow isolation, a few enduring accomplishments rose up out of Reconstruction.
While these additions were critical, Reconstruction was stopped, and the increases accomplished were dissolved by the ascent of Jim Crow regulations, racial brutality, and fundamental segregation. It was only after the social liberties development during the twentieth century that African Americans by and by battled for and accomplished huge progressions towards balance in the US.
Learn more about Reconstruction period, from:
brainly.com/question/19158215
#SPJ4
2. evaluate evaluate patrick henry's point of view,
reasoning, and use of evidence and rhetoric.
in your answer consider the following: henry's
stance, premises, links among ideas, word
choice, points of emphasis and tone.
Firstly, Henry's stance can be described as fervently in favor of American independence and freedom from British rule. He passionately believed that the American colonies should break away and form their own nation. This can be seen in his famous quote, "Give me liberty or give me death!"
Secondly, Henry's reasoning is built upon a strong foundation of premises. He argued that the British government had violated the rights of the American colonists through acts such as taxation without representation. He believed that the colonists had a natural right to resist tyranny and fight for their freedom.
Next, Henry effectively linked his ideas together through the use of rhetorical devices. He used vivid imagery and emotional appeals to evoke a strong response from his audience. For example, he described British rule as "chains and slavery" and urged his fellow colonists to "awake to arms."
Additionally, Henry carefully chose his words to convey his message. He used strong, assertive language to emphasize the urgency and importance of the colonists' struggle. His use of phrases such as "betrayed and sold" and "an act of treachery" helped to rally support for the cause of independence.
Finally, Henry's tone can be described as passionate and persuasive. He spoke with conviction and conviction in order to convince his audience to take action. His forceful delivery and powerful rhetoric left a lasting impact on the listeners.
To know more about described visit:
https://brainly.com/question/19548821
#SPJ11
Make Inferences Why would the Confederates destroy their own supplies?
The destruction of their own supplies by the Confederates during the American Civil War can be attributed to several factors.
Denial of Resources to the Enemy: The Confederates engaged in a protracted conflict against the Union forces, who possessed greater industrial and logistical capabilities. By destroying their own supplies, the Confederates aimed to deny these resources to their adversaries, preventing them from falling into enemy hands.
Retreat and Scorched Earth Tactics: In the face of Union advances, the Confederates often employed retreat and scorched earth tactics. Destroying supplies, particularly in cases where they were unable to transport or protect them, prevented their capture and further utilization by the Union forces.
Strategic Withdrawal: In situations where Confederate forces needed to withdraw or abandon a region, destroying supplies became a way to deny the enemy access to vital resources.
Rather than leaving behind usable supplies for the Union forces to capture, the Confederates opted to destroy them to weaken the enemy's capacity to sustain their operations in the area and impede their pursuit.
Limited Resources and Logistics: The Confederacy struggled with limited resources throughout the war, including shortages of food, ammunition, and other essential supplies.
To know more about American Civil War
brainly.com/question/32133001
#SPJ4
Connect Economics & History Why was boycotting British goods an effective way to protest the Stamp Act?
Boycotting British goods was an effective way to protest the Stamp Act for several reasons, like Economic Impact, Political Pressure, Nonviolent Resistance and Economic Self-Sufficiency.
Economic Impact: The boycott of British goods directly impacted the British economy. The American colonists were a significant market for British products, and their refusal to purchase British goods resulted in a decline in British exports and revenue.
Political Pressure: The boycott of British goods served as a political statement and a demonstration of unity among the American colonists.
Nonviolent Resistance: Boycotting British goods provided a nonviolent means of protest against the Stamp Act. It allowed the colonists to express their discontent and exert economic pressure without resorting to armed conflict or violence.
Economic Self-Sufficiency: The boycott of British goods also encouraged the development of domestic industries and self-sufficiency within the colonies.
Learn more about boycotting here:
brainly.com/question/32208163
#SPJ4
Describe the social changes brought about by the war.
The war brought significant social changes, including shifts in gender roles, increased mobility and urbanization, advancements in technology and industry, and changes in racial dynamics and civil rights.
The war had profound social consequences that reshaped various aspects of society. One notable change was the transformation of gender roles. With many men serving in the military, women assumed new responsibilities in the workforce, filling traditionally male-dominated jobs. This shift challenged traditional gender norms and paved the way for increased gender equality and women's rights movements.
The war also led to increased mobility and urbanization. The demand for labor and resources fueled migration from rural areas to cities, leading to the growth of urban centers. This urbanization brought about changes in lifestyle, living conditions, and cultural dynamics as diverse populations intermingled and new social structures emerged.
Technological advancements and industrial production were accelerated during the war. The need for military equipment and supplies spurred innovation and led to the development of new technologies, such as improved transportation systems and medical advancements. These advancements not only boosted the war effort but also laid the foundation for post-war industrial growth and economic prosperity.
learn more about war:
https://brainly.com/question/3223999
#SPJ4
What event led to a reduction of U.S. troop strength in Vietnam?
A. passage of the Gulf of Tonkin Resolution
B. announcement of the policy of Vietnamization
C. launch of the Tet Offensive
D. formation of the Viet Cong
The event that led to reduction of U.S. troop strength in Vietnam is " announcement of the policy of Vietnamization". Therefore, option B is correct.
The announcement of the Vietnamization policy reduced the size of the US military presence in Vietnam. Vietnamization was a strategy implemented by the U.S. government under President Richard Nixon to gradually shift the burden of combat to the South Vietnamese military and reduce the direct involvement of U.S. forces in the Vietnam War.
This policy aimed at training and equipping the South Vietnamese Army, which was responsible for waging war against the Vietnamese and North Vietnamese forces. As a result, the United States began withdrawing troops from Vietnam, reducing its military presence and transferring responsibility to the South Vietnamese Army.
Behind this decision was the desire to end the costly and unpopular war and shift the burden to local forces.
To learn more about Vietnam War:
https://brainly.com/question/12563309
#SPJ4
Now in reference to this letter do you think that Johnson is genuinely interested in improving the condition of Freedmen in the former Confederate States? Why or why not? 300 word essay
In assessing whether President Andrew Johnson was genuinely interested in improving the condition of Freedmen in the former Confederate States, we must consider his actions and policies during the Reconstruction era.
Johnson, who succeeded Abraham Lincoln after his assassination, took a more lenient approach towards the Southern states compared to the Radical Republicans in Congress. He implemented a plan known as Presidential Reconstruction, which aimed to quickly restore the Confederate states to the Union without ensuring the rights and protections of Freedmen.
One of the key indicators of Johnson's lack of genuine interest in improving the condition of Freedmen was his resistance to enforcing civil rights and equal protection measures. He vetoed the Civil Rights Act of 1866 and the Freedmen's Bureau Bill, both of which sought to secure the rights of Freedmen and ensure their economic and social well-being.
Johnson's leniency towards the former Confederates and his opposition to legislative efforts to protect Freedmen's rights raised doubts about his commitment to their well-being. He frequently clashed with Radical Republicans in Congress, who sought to ensure the full enfranchisement and equality of Freedmen through legislation such as the Reconstruction Acts.
Furthermore, Johnson's actions and policies often aligned with the interests of the Southern elite and former slaveholders. He pardoned numerous Confederate officials and sympathizers, allowing them to regain power and influence in the Southern states. This enabled the implementation of Black Codes, restrictive laws that aimed to control and limit the rights and freedoms of Freedmen, resembling a system similar to slavery.
Considering these factors, it is reasonable to question Johnson's genuine interest in improving the condition of Freedmen. His policies and actions seemed to prioritize the restoration of the pre-war social and political order, rather than ensuring the full rights and protections of the newly freed African Americans.
However, it is essential to note that historical assessments can be nuanced, and individuals' motivations and beliefs can vary. Different interpretations and arguments exist regarding Johnson's intentions and policies. To form a more comprehensive understanding, a thorough examination of historical documents and primary sources related to Johnson's views on Freedmen would be necessary.
In conclusion, based on historical analysis, President Andrew Johnson's policies and actions during Reconstruction raised doubts about his genuine interest in improving the condition of Freedmen in the former Confederate States. His leniency towards former Confederates and opposition to civil rights legislation suggested a prioritization of restoring the old order rather than ensuring the full rights and protections of the newly emancipated population.
To learn more about Andrew Johnson, here:
https://brainly.com/question/28464191
#SPJ11
Tell why France and Spain entered the war.
The Franco-Spanish War (1635–1659) was a significant conflict fought between France and Spain during the 17th century.
The war involved various allies and had complex dynamics. It began as a result of ongoing disputes and power struggles between the two European powers. France formed alliances with other states, including Sweden and several German states, while Spain received support from the Habsburgs and various Catholic allies.
The war witnessed significant military campaigns, sieges, and naval battles across different regions, including the Low Countries, Italy, and Catalonia. The conflict eventually concluded with the Treaty of the Pyrenees in 1659, which marked a shift in power dynamics and territorial changes between France and Spain.
Learn more about Spanish war here:
https://brainly.com/question/32458194
#SPJ4
Why historians refuse to claim that british introduced the rule of law in india class 8.
Since colonial law was arbitrary and Indian nationalists were instrumental in shaping the legal system in British India, historians reject the idea that the British established the rule of law in India.
Since the idea and application of the rule of law predate British colonialism and have a long history in India, historians do not assert that the British introduced it to that country. Indians were subjected to exploitation, discrimination, and denial of fundamental rights throughout the British colonial era in India. Rather than guaranteeing equal justice for all, the judicial system frequently helped to uphold colonial power.
The sedition act of 1870 is a prime example of how arbitrary British legislation was throughout the colonial era. Anyone protesting or criticising the British government could be detained under this statute without being given a fair trial. Furthermore, the evolution of the legal system in British India was significantly influenced by Indian nationalists. They objected to the British government's arbitrary exercise of power. They also advocated for universal equality.
Read more about colonial law on:
https://brainly.com/question/13154660
#SPJ4
Complete Question:
Why did historians refuse to claim that the British introduced the rule of law in India?
Make Inferences Why were Mexican Americans deported and their rights as U.S. citizens ignored in the 1930s?
Answer:
They were deported due to economics factors, xenophobia and racism, lack of legal protection.
Explanation:
Economic conditions: The 1930s marked the height of the Great Depression, a severe economic crisis that affected the United States and other countries. As jobs became scarce, there was increased competition for employment. Mexican Americans, who often worked in low-wage industries such as agriculture and mining, were viewed as threats to the limited job opportunities available for U.S. citizens. This economic pressure and fear of job displacement could have fueled discriminatory policies and deportation efforts.
Xenophobia and racism: The 1930s was a period characterized by xenophobia and racism in the United States. Anti-immigrant sentiments were prevalent, and Mexicans faced racial discrimination and stereotypes. The Mexican-American community was often seen as "foreign" and culturally different, leading to prejudice and hostility. Such attitudes could have influenced the deportation of Mexican Americans and the undermining of their rights as citizens.
Repatriation efforts: During the 1930s, the U.S. government implemented repatriation programs aimed at encouraging the return of Mexican immigrants, including both documented and undocumented individuals, to Mexico. These programs were often presented as voluntary, but they exerted pressure on Mexican Americans to leave the United States. Some were coerced or misled into believing they would receive government assistance if they returned to Mexico. These repatriation efforts contributed to the deportation of Mexican Americans and the neglect of their rights.
Lack of legal protections: Mexican Americans faced challenges in accessing legal protections and due process. They were frequently targeted by local law enforcement and immigration officials, who conducted raids and deportations without proper legal procedures. Many Mexican Americans were denied their rights to fair hearings, legal representation, and citizenship privileges, leading to the violation of their civil liberties.
Explain the importance of:
• freedmen’s school • Ku Klux Klan
• sharecropping
Freedmen's schools provided education to emancipated slaves, the Ku Klux Klan hindered their progress, and sharecropping perpetuated economic exploitation.
The establishment of freedmen's schools was of paramount importance in the post-Civil War era. These schools provided educational opportunities for emancipated slaves, empowering them to acquire knowledge, skills, and literacy necessary for economic and social advancement.
However, the emergence of the Ku Klux Klan posed a significant threat to the progress of freedmen. The Klan employed violence and intimidation to suppress African Americans, impeding their access to education, voting rights, and overall societal integration.
Furthermore, sharecropping became a prevalent system in the South, particularly affecting former slaves. Sharecroppers, often trapped in cycles of debt, would work on land owned by others and pay a share of their crops as rent, perpetuating economic exploitation and limited upward mobility.
To learn more about Freedmen's follow the link:
https://brainly.com/question/21722651
#SPJ4
There were three features of Native American life that Europeans
focused on as points of difference. List all three and briefly
explain the difference from European customs.
Europeans focused on three features of Native American life as points of difference: communal land ownership, absence of private property, and different social and gender roles.
Native American tribes practiced communal land ownership, which means that land was collectively owned and used by the community as a whole. This differed from European customs, where private property ownership was emphasized, and individuals had exclusive rights to land.
Additionally, Native American cultures had different social and gender roles compared to Europeans. Native American societies often had more egalitarian structures where decision-making and power were shared among community members. Gender roles were also more fluid, with women playing significant roles in areas such as agriculture, leadership, and spiritual practices. In contrast, European societies had more hierarchical structures and stricter gender roles, with men typically holding positions of power and authority.
To know more about Native American, click here.
https://brainly.com/question/8678061
#SPJ4
Explain the significance of each of the following.
Harriet Beecher Stowe
Harriet Beecher Stowe's novel "Uncle Tom's Cabin" sparked public outrage and played a crucial role in the abolitionist movement and the lead-up to the American Civil War.
What is the Significance of Harriet Beecher Stowe?Harriet Beecher Stowe was a prominent figure in American history, renowned for her novel "Uncle Tom's Cabin." Released in 1852, the book portrayed the brutalities of slavery and its ethical consequences, making a significant contribution to the abolitionist movement.
"Uncle Tom's Cabin" deeply influenced public sentiment, generating widespread indignation towards slavery and heightening the divisions between regions, ultimately leading to the outbreak of the American Civil War. Stowe's literary masterpiece had a pivotal role in shaping public opinion and advancing societal transformation.
Learn more about Harriet Beecher Stowe on:
https://brainly.com/question/1751903
#SPJ4
Complete Question:
Explain the significance of Harriet Beecher Stowe in American History.
Why did some slaves not find out about emancipation for months, even years, after the civil war ended?.
After the Civil War ended and the Emancipation Proclamation was issued, the news of emancipation did not reach all slaves immediately for several reasons.
First, communication networks were limited during that time, especially in rural areas, making it difficult for information to spread quickly. Additionally, slave owners in some regions deliberately withheld the news to maintain control over their labor force.
Some slaves were isolated on plantations or remote areas, and the presence of Union troops was not always guaranteed to enforce the proclamation. It took time for word to travel, and the process of emancipation varied across different states, leading to delays in slaves receiving the news of their freedom.
Learn more about civil war here:
https://brainly.com/question/11874600
#SPJ4
How did the U.S. economy and political climate change after World War II?
Post-WWII: U.S. became an economic powerhouse, global leader, with Cold War tensions, military spending, Red Scare, and McCarthyism.
After World War II, the U.S. experienced significant changes in its economy and political climate. Economically, the U.S. transformed into a global superpower. The war had stimulated industrial production, leading to a period of economic expansion. The government implemented policies that promoted economic growth, such as the GI Bill, which provided education and housing benefits to veterans. The U.S. emerged as a leader in technological advancements, fostering the rise of industries like aerospace and electronics.
Politically, the war contributed to a shift in global power dynamics, with the U.S. becoming a dominant player on the world stage. The onset of the Cold War with the Soviet Union led to increased military spending and the establishment of alliances like NATO. Domestically, there was a climate of anti-communism, resulting in the Red Scare and the rise of McCarthyism. These changes ultimately shaped the U.S. as a global economic and political force.
To learn more about McCarthyism follow the link:
https://brainly.com/question/30164520
#SPJ4
Location In which states did much of the fighting take place between 1776 and 1777?
During the American Revolutionary War, much of the fighting between 1776 and 1777 took place in New York, New Jersey, and Pennsylvania. These battles were crucial in determining the outcome of the war and securing American independence.
During the American Revolutionary War, much of the fighting between 1776 and 1777 took place in several states. The states that witnessed the majority of the action were New York, New Jersey, and Pennsylvania. During this period, the colonies were fighting to gain independence from Great Britain.The battles fought during this period were some of the most crucial and most heavily contested. One of the most critical battles during this period was the Battle of Long Island, which took place in New York. It was the first battle after the signing of the Declaration of Independence and was crucial to the outcome of the war.
The British had a decisive victory, but the Continental Army was able to evacuate and fight another day.In New Jersey, the Battle of Trenton was fought in 1776. This battle was one of the Continental Army's first victories and helped to bolster morale. George Washington and his troops crossed the Delaware River and attacked Hessian mercenaries, which resulted in a decisive American victory.
The Battle of Princeton also took place in New Jersey, just a week later. Once again, the Continental Army was victorious. It was a major turning point in the war and gave the colonists a much-needed morale boost.In Pennsylvania, the Battle of Brandywine took place in 1777. This was another important battle and was the largest of the war up to that point. Unfortunately, the Continental Army was once again defeated. Despite this setback, they were able to regroup and fight another day. The battles fought in these three states played a vital role in securing American independence.
During the American Revolutionary War, much of the fighting between 1776 and 1777 took place in New York, New Jersey, and Pennsylvania. These battles were crucial in determining the outcome of the war and securing American independence. Some of the most important battles during this period include the Battle of Long Island, the Battle of Trenton, the Battle of Princeton, and the Battle of Brandywine. Although the Continental Army suffered defeats in some of these battles, they were able to regroup and continue fighting. In the end, it was the determination and perseverance of the colonists that led to their victory over Great Britain.
To learn more about mercenaries visit:
brainly.com/question/14313544
#SPJ11
True/False. Early art renditions of dinosaurs were frequently based on one bone obtained from the fossil site, rather than a complete fossilized skeleton of the dinosaur
The given statement " Early art renditions of dinosaurs were " is False because Early art renditions of dinosaurs were not frequently based on only one bone obtained from the fossil site.
Generally, a majority of the art depictions were based on complete fossilized skeletons of the dinosaur. Scientists and paleontologists were able to draw a much more accurate picture of a dinosaurs anatomy by using multiple bones rather than a single one.
Artists were able to add more detail to the sculpture by having access to the individual bone which allowed for accurate scale, proportion, and movement in the rendition of the prehistoric animal. To make the creation even more realistic, paleontologists took artistic liberties and even added some feathers or fur to the dinosaur based on their understanding of the time period.
To know more about fossil site, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/31937371
#SPJ4
The Battle of Tippecanoe, November 7,1811 , has been called the opening battle of the War of 1812 . Which of the following statements about the battle is NOT true? William Henry Harrison, with a force that included many Kentuckians, camped near the Indian village of Prophetstown on November 6,1811. Though some 200 Indians were killed and Prophetstown was burned, 62 Americans were killed, and another 126 were wounded. Major Joseph Hamilton Daviess, was among the many Kentuckians who died in the Battle of Tippecanoe. Forces led by Tecumseh attacked Harrison's forces early on the morning of November 7
th
.
The Battle of Tippecanoe was an important battle that marked the beginning of the War of 1812.
William Henry Harrison marched towards the Indian village of Prophetstown on November 6, 1811, and camped near it. On the morning of November 7, forces led by Tecumseh attacked Harrison's forces, and the battle ensued. Unfortunately, 62 American soldiers died as a result of the battle and another 126 were injured.
Major Joseph Hamilton was among the Kentuckians who died in the battle. However, it is not true that William Henry Harrison had a force that included many Kentuckians, as the majority of his troops consisted of militiamen from other states. Overall, the Battle of Tippecanoe was a significant event that marked the start of the War of 1812.
To know more about Battle of Tippecanoe, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/30551930
#SPJ4
In the United States, direct expenditures (as a percentage of national output) for governments between 1990 and 1997 Multiple Choice trended up for state and local governments and down for the federal government. trended down for the federal government and remained relatively stable for state and local governments. trended down for all levels of government. trended up for all levels of government:
Direct expenditures (as a percentage of national output) trended down for the federal government and remained relatively stable for state and local governments.
Between 1990 and 1997 in the United States, the trend for direct expenditures as a percentage of national output was a decrease for the federal government and relative stability for state and local governments. This means that the federal government's direct expenditures as a share of the national output declined during this period, while state and local governments maintained a relatively stable level of direct expenditures in relation to the national output.
The shift towards decreased direct expenditures for the federal government could be attributed to various factors, including changes in fiscal policies, budget constraints, or shifts in spending priorities. Meanwhile, state and local governments may have experienced more consistent levels of direct expenditures, reflecting their responsibilities in areas such as education, infrastructure, and public services, which require ongoing funding.
To know more about federal government , click here.
https://brainly.com/question/14858877
#SPJ4
------------The given question is incomplete, the complete question is:
"In the United States, direct expenditures (as a percentage of national output) for governments between 1990 and 1997
trended up for state and local governments and down for the federal government.
trended down for the federal government and remained relatively stable for state and local governments.
trended down for all levels of government.
trended up for all levels of government."------------
which military action led to the start of world war i? germany’s invasion of france russia’s invasion of germany austria-hungary’s invasion of serbia italy’s invasion of bosnia
It was the assassination of Franz Ferdinand on June 28, 1914, of Sarajevo, Bosnia, and Herzegovina
Explanation:
Hastorf and cantril (1954) found that princeton students identified twice as many dartmouth violations as dartmouth students did when each watched the game. this emphasizes?
When both princeton and dartmouth students observed the game, Hastorf and Cantril (1954) discovered that princeton students noticed twice as many violations as did dartmouth students. This highlights how quickly people form assumptions about the world.
People tend to intentionally filter information they believe is irrelevant when participating in selective group perception. The case study They Saw a Game by Hastorf and Cantril illustrates this impact.
Famously, a football game between Princeton and Dartmouth illustrated how humans create reality. The game was harsh and dirty, living up to its reputation as a grudge battle. Students viewed the films. The implication is that although there is an objective world, we constantly see it through the prism of our beliefs and values.
Read more about princeton dartmouth at
https://brainly.com/question/10873828
#SPJ4
Describe your understanding of the Black Theatre, Music & Dance to the creation of African American culture, how does it differ from the European indentured servants?
Answer:
The Black Theatre, Music and Dance have been extremely important to the creation of African American culture and in distinguishing it from European culture in the United States. Some key ways:
1) They provided a form of self-expression that was uniquely African in origin and shaped by the experience of slavery and oppression. The rhythms, movements and stories drew from African traditions adapted to the New World. This gave African Americans a cultural identity distinct from European Americans.
2) They reinforced a sense of community and shared history among African Americans, allowing them to preserve aspects of their African heritage and roots despite the trauma of being forcibly brought to America. The performances became a way to celebrate Black identity, resilience and humanity.
3) They acted as a means of resistance and protest against the injustices of slavery and segregation. Through songs, storytelling and dance, African Americans voiced their struggles and aspirations for freedom. The performances became acts of defiance.
4) They blended African and American cultural influences in new and innovative ways, giving rise to truly hybrid creations like jazz, blues, spirituals and other art forms that originated within the Black community. This infusion of African and American influences characterized African American culture.
5) In contrast, the cultural expressions of European indentured servants and immigrants were more directly transplanted from European roots with less adaptation and blending with American influences. Their cultures remained closer to those of their homelands.
So in summary, the Black Theatre, Music and Dance that arose from the African American experience of slavery, oppression and cultural fusion came to define African American culture and set it distinctly apart from European culture in the United States. The expressions celebrated African heritage within an American context.
How did Jackson destroy the national bank?
Jackson did not directly destroy the national bank, but he played a significant role in its demise. The national bank, officially known as the Second Bank of the United States, was established in 1816 and granted a 20-year charter to serve as the central bank of the country.
However, Jackson harbored deep suspicions about the concentration of power in the hands of a few wealthy individuals and believed that the bank favored the interests of the elite at the expense of the common people.
Jackson's efforts to dismantle the national bank can be traced back to his first term as president in the 1830s. He accused the bank of being unconstitutional & argued that it concentrated too much power in the hands of a private institution.
In 1832, Jackson vetoed a bill to renew the bank's charter, a move that was highly controversial at the time. Despite significant support for the bank among powerful politicians and business leaders, Jackson's veto was popular among many ordinary Americans who shared his distrust of the institution. Jackson capitalized on this popular sentiment & won reelection later that year.
To know more about national bank
brainly.com/question/17189854
#SPJ4
