The Marquis de Lafayette is the French officer who fought for America. He was born in 1757 to a family of wealthy French nobles and inherited a considerable fortune when his parents died.
He was fascinated by the American Revolution and saw it as an opportunity to fight for the ideals of freedom and democracy that he had espoused since childhood. Lafayette sailed to America in 1777 and was soon introduced to General George Washington, who took an immediate liking to him.
Lafayette quickly became one of Washington's most trusted aides and played a key role in several important battles, including Yorktown.
In recognition of his service, he was made an honorary citizen of the United States and awarded a large estate in Florida. Today, he is remembered as one of America's most beloved heroes of the Revolution.
To know more about officer visit:
https://brainly.com/question/28486188
#SPJ11
Discussion based assessment on unit 3 great empires of the world.
Unit 3: Great Empires of the World - Discussion-Based Assessment
In this unit, we have explored the rise and fall of great empires throughout history. Empires have played a crucial role in shaping the world and have left a lasting impact on culture, politics, and society. Now, let's engage in a discussion-based assessment to reflect on our learning and exchange ideas.
What are some common characteristics or factors that contributed to the success and expansion of great empires?Discuss the significant achievements or contributions of at least two empires we have studied in this unit.Empires are often criticized for their oppressive nature and exploitation of conquered territories. How did empires maintain control over vast territories, and what were the consequences for the conquered peoples?Reflect on the reasons behind the decline and fall of empires. Are there any patterns or recurring themes that we can identify?Consider the long-term legacies of empires. How have the empires we studied influenced subsequent civilizations and contemporary world affairs?In today's globalized world, do empires still exist in some form? How do they compare to the empires of the past?for similar questions on empires.
https://brainly.com/question/17393679
#SPJ8
Prompt:
Using the primary documents, construct a conversation between a poor, landless farmer and a middle class American in which each evaluates the economic challenges and benefits they face. In doing so, be sure to define and explain what Americans understood to be meant by "the middle class. " Why was it almost impossible for landless farmers to achieve middle class status?
In this conversation between a poor, landless farmer and a middle-class American, they discuss their economic challenges and benefits.
The middle class is defined as a social and economic group that enjoyed a relatively comfortable lifestyle and had aspirations for upward mobility. It was almost impossible for landless farmers to achieve middle-class status due to various factors such as limited access to land, lack of capital, and the dominance of large-scale agriculture.
Conversation:
Farmer: I'm struggling to make ends meet. As a poor, landless farmer, I barely have enough to feed my family. It seems like there's no way out of this cycle of poverty.
Middle-class American: I understand your struggles, and I sympathize with your situation. As a middle-class American, I have a stable job, a decent income, and some financial security. However, I still face my own set of economic challenges.
Farmer: What does it mean to be part of the middle class? How do you define it?
Middle-class American: The middle class is generally considered the social and economic group that falls between the working class and the upper class. It is characterized by a certain level of income, education, and standard of living. Middle-class individuals typically have steady employment, own homes, and can afford basic comforts and some luxuries.
Farmer: It seems almost impossible for landless farmers like me to achieve middle-class status. Why is that?
Middle-class American: There are several reasons for this. One major factor is the limited access to land. Land ownership was a key source of wealth and economic stability in America, and without land, it was challenging for farmers to build wealth and security.
Additionally, the dominance of large-scale agriculture and the rise of mechanization meant that small-scale farmers struggled to compete. They faced intense competition, low prices for their produce, and difficulty accessing credit and resources.
Moreover, landless farmers lacked the capital and resources needed to invest in modern farming techniques and technologies that could improve productivity and profitability. This further hindered their ability to break free from poverty and achieve middle-class status.
In conclusion, the middle class in America enjoyed a relatively comfortable lifestyle and had aspirations for upward mobility. However, for landless farmers, achieving middle-class status was almost impossible due to limited access to land, lack of capital, and the challenges posed by large-scale agriculture. These systemic barriers prevented them from escaping poverty and realizing the economic benefits enjoyed by the middle class.
Learn more about Economic challenges in america here:
brainly.com/question/14052264
#SPJ11
The middle class was characterized by land ownership, economic stability, and independence, while landless farmers faced dependence and limited social mobility. Due to lack of land, it was nearly impossible for farmers to achieve middle class status.
Explanation:The middle class in America during this period was defined by possession of land, some level of economic stability, and the ability to participate in society as independent citizens. Their economic challenges included market competition, economic fluctuations, and the need to maintain a certain standard of living. Benefits included the ability to provide for their families, influence in society, and opportunities for leisure.
The landless farmer, on the other hand, faces economic challenges such as dependence on others for livelihood, susceptibility to economic downturns and exploitation, scarcity of resources, and limited social mobility. The benefits, although limited, might include a simpler lifestyle, strong community bonds, and some level of freedom from market forces.
It was almost impossible for landless farmers to achieve middle class status because they did not possess the assets, specifically land, that allowed for economic stability and independence. Without land ownership, it's difficult to generate a stable and sufficient income, acquire additional resources, or gain societal respect and influence.
Learn more about Social Stratification here:https://brainly.com/question/32082422
#SPJ11
do you believe the japanese announcement is accurate why?
Answer:to make it legal to move Japanese Americans to internment camps
Explanation:
who did not help workers start uniouns
Answer:
Companies. Workers unions give workers more rights safety regulations, better wages, fewer hours, and freedom of speech and assembly. But most companies oppose workers unionizing and threatened to fire workers for it
Question 5 of 10 Which statement best describes the outcome of the 1980 presidential election? O A.Ronald Reagan's victory reflected the country's desire for a more liberal president. OB. Jimmy Carter's victory reflected the country's desire to continue with the president's policies. OC. Ronald Reagan's victory reflected the country's desire for a more conservative president. O D. Jimmy Carter's victory reflected the country's desire to give the president more time to enact his policies.
Answer:
Option C is the correct answer.
Explanation:
The statement that best describes the outcome of the 1980 presidential election is: "Ronald Reagan's victory reflected the country's desire for a more conservative president."This is because Ronald Reagan, who was a conservative, won the election with a significant majority. During his campaign, he promised to restore national pride and fix the country's economy, which resonated with the American people who were tired of economic turmoil and political unrest. His policies included reducing government regulations, cutting taxes, and increasing military spending. These policies reflected a more conservative ideology, which was favored by a majority of the American people at that time. Therefore, option C is the correct answer.
according to the author what are the strange complaints roman critics had of christians
According to historical accounts, Roman critics of Christians in the early centuries had several peculiar complaints about them. These criticisms stemmed from a lack of understanding, cultural differences, and clashes with established religious practices. Some of the strange complaints raised by Roman critics of Christians include:
1. Atheism: Romans considered the monotheistic beliefs of Christians as atheistic because they rejected the traditional Roman pantheon of gods. They saw Christians' refusal to worship other deities as a rejection of the state religion and regarded them as atheists.
2. Cannibalism: Misunderstanding the symbolism of the Eucharist, where Christians partook in the ritual of consuming bread and wine as the body and blood of Christ, Roman critics accused them of cannibalism. The language used in Christian rituals was taken literally, leading to these misconceptions.
3. Incestuous practices: Roman critics distorted the Christian notion of brotherhood and love within the community. The term "brother" used among Christians was misconstrued, leading to accusations of incestuous relationships.
4. Political disloyalty: Christians' refusal to worship the Roman emperor as a god was seen as a sign of disloyalty to the state. This refusal was interpreted as a rejection of the Roman imperial cult and posed a threat to the social and political order.
5. Social disruption: Christians' separation from Roman society and their exclusive religious gatherings raised suspicions among Romans. Their refusal to participate in pagan rituals and public events was seen as a disruption to social cohesion.
for more questions on Roman critics
https://brainly.com/question/6422284
#SPJ8
Explain why Kuwóot yas.éin (Alaska) was resolved so differently than the African Burial Ground or Kennewick Man examples. What did Alaskan archaeologists do right? Support your argument with specific examples.
The remains of Kennewick Man and the African Burial Ground were remove without the consent of the local community.
Members of those communities felt a great deal of resentment and rage as a result.In contrast, when remains were discovered in Alaska's Kuwait the archaeologists collaborated with the local community to determine the best course of action.2. At the point when the site was found in Gold country, the nearby local area was quickly advised and gotten to assist with the exhuming.
Conversely, when the African Graveyard was found in New York City, the regional government attempted to stay quiet about it.Additionally, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers attempted to destroy the remains of the Kennewick Man when they discovered them in Washington state.These are all examples of how the situation at was so different from the two other sites.Because of this difference, it's possible that many scientists were less opposed to returning their human remains for Alaskan tribes.Learn more about Kennewick Man:
brainly.com/question/28437072
#SPJ4
What events made the building of the Panama Canal so important to the United States?
The construction of the Panama Canal is important to the United States because of its commercial effectiveness, naval power, global influence, and economic growth.
The construction of the Panama Canal was important to the United States for several reasons. First, it provided an important shortcut to maritime trade, significantly reducing the distance and time required to transport goods between the Atlantic and Pacific oceans.
Second, it strengthens America's naval power and strategic influence in the Western Hemisphere. In addition, the training channel facilitates the deployment of U.S. military and economic interests around the world, enhancing the country's role as a global power, and promoting economic growth as well as advantages in international trade.
Learn more about Panama Canal:
https://brainly.com/question/26573102
#SPJ4
Compare and Contrast In what ways did the Federalists and Democratic-Republicans differ?
Federalists and Democratic-Republicans differed in various ways. This essay will compare and contrast their differences.
The Federalist Party was founded in the 1790s by Alexander Hamilton, John Adams, and others, while the Democratic-Republican Party was founded by Thomas Jefferson and James Madison at the same time.In terms of government involvement, Federalists believed in a strong centralized government with limited power granted to individual states.
On the other hand, Democratic-Republicans believed in a decentralized government in which states retained more power. Federalists preferred a loose interpretation of the Constitution, which allowed for a broad interpretation of governmental authority, while Democratic-Republicans favored a strict interpretation that restricted federal power.
To know more about differed visit:
https://brainly.com/question/30241588
#SPJ11
identify a word that means the opposite of seced
Answer:
The word that means the opposite of "secede" is "unite" or "reunite."
Describe how mining affected western settlement in the late 1800s.
Mining affected western settlement in the late 1800s by luring people to the area, bringing forth changes in the economy, and making significant changes to the physical landscape.
The discovery of gold and silver in the late 1800s led to the rapid development of the mining industry. People came to the West in search of wealth, and the population of western towns increased significantly. As a result, towns sprang up in areas where they hadn’t existed before, changing the western settlement.
Mining brought about the construction of railroads and other infrastructure that connected these towns to the rest of the country. This, in turn, led to further growth in other sectors of the economy such as agriculture. Ranching also became a major industry in the region as miners needed food and raw materials for their daily lives.
The mining industry had a significant impact on the physical landscape, as well. Rivers and streams were rerouted, and hills and mountains were flattened to extract precious minerals. Some towns were literally built on top of old mining sites, and the remnants of the mining industry are still visible today.
To know more about people visit:
https://brainly.com/question/27216557
#SPJ11
Help please asap thank you
Answer:
6, -1, 0, 4, 15Step-by-step explanation:the higher the negative number is, the smaller it is. its like being in debt
Explanation:
Question 10 of 10 Which statement best describes President Carter's response when Soviet troops were discovered in Cuba? A. President Carter had American athletes boycott the Olympics in Moscow in protest of Soviet troops in Cuba. OB. President Carter canceled SALT II talks in an effort to show the American people he took the threat seriously. C. President Carter tried to assure the American public that there was no threat, but he still sent troops to Cuba. D. President Carter tried to assure the American public that there was no threat and took no direct action.
Answer: c
Explanation:
Answer: D. President Carter tried to assure the American public that there was no threat and took no direct action.
Explanation:
7.04 Semester Test: World History k12 final
I NEED HELPPPP I DONT HAVE A LOT OF PONITSSS IM IN 10TH GRADE
1. The statement that best describes national economies in Europe after WWI is: C. Almost all the major economies were bankrupt
2. Regarding the generalization about political life in postwar Europe, the most accurate statement is: d. Changing forms of government created a sense of insecurity.
3. The style of art that developed after WWI and was meant to subvert and mock everything about modern civilization, including art itself, is: B. Dadaism.
4. The option that is NOT an impact of the Great Depression on European colonies in Africa, Asia, and Latin America is: D. They were able to invest in their own region.
5. The option that was not a direct cause of the Great Depression is: d. the Russian Revolution.
1. Following WWI, Western European countries such as France, the United Kingdom, and Germany experienced economic growth and recovery.
2. After WWI, there were significant political changes and transitions taking place across Europe. The collapse of empires, the rise of new nations, and the emergence of different political ideologies created a sense of uncertainty and insecurity in many countries.
3. Old forms of government were challenged, leading to political instability and the need for new political structures and systems.
4. The Great Depression had a detrimental impact on the economies of European colonies in Africa, Asia, and Latin America. It led to various consequences, including the imposition of tariffs by other nations on their products, reduced demand from consumers in the United States and Europe for non-essential goods grown in these colonies, and an increase in taxes imposed by their colonial governments.
5. The Russian Revolution, which took place in 1917, occurred several years before the Great Depression began in 1929. While the Russian Revolution had significant geopolitical and ideological implications, it was not a direct cause of the economic downturn that led to the Great Depression.
For such more question on political:
https://brainly.com/question/1391454
#SPJ8
The following question may be like this:
1. Which statement best describes national economies in Europe after WWI?
A)In most areas, wartime industry brought significant economic gains
B)Western Europe remained economically strong, but the economies of eastern and southern Europe were devastated
C)Almost all the major economies were bankrupt
D)Although the war battered most European economies, with the help of wartime reparations paid by Germany, they soon rebounded.
2. Which generalization is true of political life in postwar Europe?
a. People clung to old forms of government.
b. Strong leadership made the public anxious.
c. Many countries had no organized political parties.
d. Changing forms of government created a sense of insecurity.
3. Which style of art developed after WWI was meant to subvert and mock everything about modern civilization, including art itself?
Cubism Dadaism Realism Surrealism.4. Which is NOT an impact of the Great Depression on European colonies in Africa, Asia and Latin America?
Other nations put tariffs on their productsConsumers in the United States and Europe cut back on non-essentials grown thereTheir colonial governments increased taxesThey were able to invest in their own region5. Which was not a direct cause of the Great Depression?
a. decline in farming prices
b. the stock market crash
c. bank failures
d. the Russian Revolution
What do you imagine it would feel like to immigrate?
List at least two words or phrases that describe how immigrants like Mary Antin may have felt when they first arrived in the United States.
Two words or phrases that could describe how Mary Antin and other immigrants may have felt upon their arrival are overwhelmed and hopeful.
When immigrating to a new country, such as Mary Antin arriving in the United States, it is likely that immigrants experienced a mixture of emotions and sensations.
Two words or phrases that could describe how Mary Antin and other immigrants may have felt upon their arrival are:
1. Overwhelmed:
The vastness and unfamiliarity of a new country can be overwhelming for immigrants. They may have felt a sense of being surrounded by new sights, sounds, and cultural norms that differed greatly from their home country. This overwhelming feeling could stem from the challenges of adapting to a new language, customs, and social dynamics.2. Hopeful:
Despite the challenges, immigrants often embark on their journey with a sense of hope for a better life. They may have felt a strong sense of optimism and anticipation for the opportunities that the new country could provide. This hope may have been fueled by aspirations for economic stability, social mobility, and the chance to create a better future for themselves and their families.It's important to note that the experiences and emotions of immigrants can vary widely, as each person's journey is unique.
For more such questions on Immigrants:
https://brainly.com/question/16267373
#SPJ8
The National Banking System was put in place during the Civil War and led to a dual banking system. Discuss two major flaws in the system that contributed to economic instability in the period leading up to the creation of the Federal Reserve.
The two major flaws in the National Banking System that contributed to economic instability in the period leading up to the creation of the Federal Reserve were limited banking supervision and an unstable currency.
The first major flaw was the lack of effective banking supervision. Under the National Banking System, banks were regulated by a patchwork of state and federal laws, leading to inconsistencies and loopholes in oversight. State banks, in particular, operated with varying degrees of regulation, creating an environment where risky lending practices and speculative investments could go unchecked. This lack of oversight allowed for the proliferation of unscrupulous banking practices, such as overissuing banknotes beyond the reserves held, which ultimately destabilized the financial system.
The second major flaw was the absence of a stable and uniform currency. The National Banking System relied on a system of state-chartered banks that issued their own banknotes, which were then used as currency. These banknotes were not backed by a uniform reserve of gold or silver, leading to significant fluctuations in their value.
The lack of a stable currency hindered economic transactions and created uncertainty among businesses and individuals. Moreover, the value of banknotes could vary across state lines, making interstate commerce more complex and contributing to economic inefficiencies.
Learn more about National Banking System
brainly.com/question/32225320
#SPJ11
how did egypts main crops of papyrus and cereals best contribute to the development of the civilization?
How did Egypt's main crops of papyrus and cereals best contribute to the development of the civilization? They were difficult to grow in this region, so they were in high demand. They were crucial materials needed for creating other products. They had many uses at home and could be traded for other goods.
How would history have changed/not changed if Hideyoshi Toyotomi
had lived longer?
If Hideyoshi Toyotomi had lived longer, Japanese history would have changed as follows: There would have been no Tokugawa Shogunate. 2. No Japanese Invasion of Korea. 3. Christianity might have become more popular.
Hideyoshi Toyotomi was a Japanese daimyo who played an essential role in the unification of Japan during the Azuchi–Momoyama period. He was known as one of the greatest warriors of his time, and his death in 1598 had a significant impact on Japanese history. If Hideyoshi Toyotomi had lived longer, Japanese history would have changed as follows:
1. There would have been no Tokugawa Shogunate: After the death of Hideyoshi Toyotomi, a power vacuum arose, which led to the rise of the Tokugawa Shogunate. If Hideyoshi Toyotomi had lived longer, he might have been able to hold onto power, and the Tokugawa Shogunate would not have risen. This would have significantly altered the course of Japanese history.
2. No Japanese Invasion of Korea: One of the significant actions of Hideyoshi Toyotomi during his reign was the invasion of Korea. This invasion resulted in significant losses for Japan. If Hideyoshi Toyotomi had lived longer, he might have decided to cancel the invasion of Korea. This would have resulted in a peaceful relationship between Korea and Japan for a longer period.
3. Christianity might have become more popular: During the reign of Hideyoshi Toyotomi, Christians were persecuted. However, it is believed that he was going to relax the persecution policy before he died. If he had lived longer, he might have relaxed the policy further, which would have allowed Christianity to flourish in Japan. This would have changed Japanese history significantly.
In conclusion, if Hideyoshi Toyotomi had lived longer, Japanese history would have changed significantly. There might have been no Tokugawa Shogunate, no Japanese invasion of Korea, and Christianity might have become more popular.
Read more about Japanese History at https://brainly.com/question/10325158
#SPJ11
What were the causes and effects of the German economic crisis of the 1920s and the global depression of the 1930s?
Answer:
- Causes of the German Economic Crisis of the 1920s: Reparations imposed by the Treaty of Versailles after World War I left Germany with a huge debt burden that it struggled to pay.
- Effects of the German Economic Crisis of the 1920s: Hyperinflation wiped out the savings of many Germans and led to social unrest.
Explanation:
The German economic crisis of the 1920s and the global depression of the 1930s were two interconnected events that had long-lasting effects on the world economy and political landscape. Here are the causes and effects of both events:
Causes of the German Economic Crisis of the 1920s:
Reparations imposed by the Treaty of Versailles after World War I left Germany with a huge debt burden that it struggled to pay.
The government's decision to print money to pay off the debt led to hyperinflation, with prices increasing at an astronomical rate.
The loss of foreign markets due to protectionist policies in other countries, such as high tariffs, also hurt the German economy.
Effects of the German Economic Crisis of the 1920s:
Hyperinflation wiped out the savings of many Germans and led to social unrest.
The economic turmoil created an environment in which extremist political movements, such as the Nazi Party, gained popularity.
The crisis weakened the Weimar Republic, the German government established after World War I, and made it vulnerable to political instability.
Causes of the Global Depression of the 1930s:
The stock market crash of 1929 in the United States sparked a worldwide economic downturn.
Overproduction and overinvestment in the 1920s led to a glut of goods and falling prices.
Protectionist policies, such as high tariffs and trade barriers, reduced international trade and worsened the economic situation.
Effects of the Global Depression of the 1930s:
Unemployment rates soared, and many people lost their homes and savings.
Governments around the world implemented austerity measures to try and balance their budgets, leading to further economic hardship.
The depression contributed to the rise of authoritarian regimes in Europe, including Nazi Germany and fascist Italy.
In summary, the German economic crisis of the 1920s and the global depression of the 1930s were both rooted in economic and political factors that led to widespread hardship and instability. These events had long-lasting effects on the world economy and political landscape, contributing to the rise of extremist movements and authoritarian regimes, as well as the eventual outbreak of World War II.
how do historians define the modern era
Historians define the modern era as a period of time characterized by significant social, cultural, political, and technological changes that distinguish it from earlier historical periods. The exact timeframe for the modern era may vary slightly depending on the context and region being studied, but it generally encompasses the period from the late 18th century to the present day.
The modern era is typically associated with key transformative events and developments, including:
The Enlightenment: The Enlightenment was an intellectual movement in the 18th century that emphasized reason, science, and individualism, challenging traditional authority and promoting ideas of liberty, equality, and progress.Industrial Revolution: The Industrial Revolution, beginning in the late 18th century, brought about significant changes in manufacturing, transportation, and agriculture. It led to the mechanization of production, urbanization, and the rise of capitalism, fundamentally altering economic and social structures.Political Revolutions: The late 18th and 19th centuries witnessed major political revolutions, such as the American Revolution (1775-1783), French Revolution (1789-1799), and subsequent revolutionary movements. These revolutions aimed to establish new forms of government and challenge traditional social hierarchies.Globalization: The modern era is characterized by increasing interconnectedness and globalization, with advancements in transportation, communication, and trade leading to a more interconnected and interdependent world.Overall, historians define the modern era as a period marked by profound transformations in various spheres of human activity, reflecting the emergence of new ideas, systems, and structures that have shaped the world we live in today.
for similar questions on modern era.
https://brainly.com/question/4693426
#SPJ8
Analyze Point of View Why did people criticize FDR and his New Deal policies?
Franklin D. Roosevelt during and even decades after his tenure was criticized by various groups for his New Deal policies.
Some critics feared the potential of the establishment of Communism or Socialism in the US due to the excessive role of government these policies involved. They argued that these policies undermined the free market principles and individual liberty.
Some groups argued that the excessive control of the government stifled Economic Growth and job creation and hence could not effectively address the Great Depression.
The New Deal policy was even criticized from a Constitutional perspective citing that policies like NIRA and AAA exceeded the government's authority, violating the principles of Federalism.
The New Deal Policies were however even supported by many Americans as it was successful in bringing about reform, recovery, and relief to a mass in their time of need.
To learn more about the New Deal Policy visit
https://brainly.com/question/29355402
#SPJ4
which action by u.s government is an example of monetary policy
An example of monetary policy implemented by the U.S. government is the setting of interest rates by the Federal Reserve (the central bank of the United States). The Federal Reserve has the authority to control the money supply and influence interest rates through various tools at its disposal.
One specific action within monetary policy is the Federal Reserve's ability to adjust the federal funds rate. The federal funds rate is the interest rate at which banks lend and borrow funds overnight from each other to meet reserve requirements. By increasing or decreasing the federal funds rate, the Federal Reserve can influence borrowing costs, economic activity, and inflation.
For instance, during times of economic expansion, the Federal Reserve may raise interest rates to curb inflationary pressures and slow down excessive borrowing and spending. On the other hand, during periods of economic downturn or recession, the Federal Reserve may lower interest rates to encourage borrowing, investment, and stimulate economic growth.
By implementing changes to interest rates, the U.S. government, through the Federal Reserve, aims to manage economic stability, employment levels, and price stability. This demonstrates how the control of interest rates is an example of monetary policy in action.
for similar questions on u.s government.
https://brainly.com/question/9386829
#SPJ8
Read each question and choose the best answer.
Which was a result of the Missouri Compromise?
A. Congress established a protective tariff.
B. The Mason-Dixon Line divided slave states and free states.
C. Slavery was banned from the Louisiana Territory.
D. Maine was admitted to the Union as a free state.
The Missouri Compromise was a legislation enacted in the United States on May 8, 1820, that regulated the expansion of slavery in the United States.
As a result of the Missouri Compromise, Maine was admitted to the Union as a free state and Missouri as a slave state.Maine was admitted to the Union as a free state. In addition to admitting Maine as a free state and Missouri as a slave state, the Missouri Compromise established the Mason-Dixon line.
The legislation prohibited slavery north of the 36° 30' parallel, which was the southern border of Missouri, and north of this boundary, slavery was prohibited in the Louisiana Territory. Congress established a protective tariff that increased the costs of imported goods, was not a result of the Missouri Compromise.
To know more about legislation visit:
https://brainly.com/question/15522014
#SPJ11
what is the revolt that Thoreau addresses?
The revolt that Thoreau addresses is civil disobedience and resistance to unjust laws and government actions.
Certainly! In his essay "Civil Disobedience," Henry David Thoreau addresses the concept of revolt by advocating for the moral duty of individuals to resist unjust laws and oppressive government actions. Thoreau believes that individuals have a responsibility to follow their own conscience and principles, even if it means disobeying laws that they deem to be morally wrong or unjust.
Thoreau argues that blind obedience to authority, without questioning or challenging the legitimacy of laws, can perpetuate injustice and enable oppressive systems to persist. He emphasizes the importance of individual agency and personal responsibility in effecting social change. Thoreau himself demonstrated this belief by refusing to pay taxes as a form of protest against the institution of slavery and the Mexican-American War.
For Thoreau, civil disobedience is not merely an act of rebellion, but a conscientious objection rooted in one's own moral convictions. He advocates for peaceful resistance and nonviolent means of protest, highlighting the power of passive resistance and the ability of individuals to peacefully confront unjust systems and provoke change.
Thoreau's ideas on civil disobedience have had a significant influence on various movements throughout history, such as the Civil Rights Movement led by Martin Luther King Jr. and the nonviolent resistance against colonial rule by Mahatma Gandhi. Thoreau's call for individual autonomy, ethical responsibility, and the power of nonviolent protest continues to resonate as a foundational principle in the struggle for justice and equality.
Learn more about Thoreau concept of civil disobedience
https://brainly.com/question/30026011
Explain how the terms and names in each group are related.
Fourteen Points, League of Nations, Treaty of Versailles
The Fourteen Points, League of Nations, and Treaty of Versailles are interconnected as they are all related to the aftermath of World War I, with the Fourteen Points guiding peace negotiations, the League of Nations being established as a global organization for peace, and the Treaty of Versailles serving as the official peace agreement.
The terms and names mentioned are all interconnected through their relevance to World War I and the post-war settlement:
Fourteen Points: The Fourteen Points was a statement by U.S. President Woodrow Wilson in 1918, outlining his vision for a post-war world order based on principles such as self-determination, open diplomacy, and the establishment of a League of Nations.League of Nations: The League of Nations was an international organization proposed by Woodrow Wilson and established in 1920 as part of the Treaty of Versailles. It aimed to promote peace, resolve conflicts diplomatically, and prevent future wars through collective security and international cooperation.Treaty of Versailles: The Treaty of Versailles was the peace treaty signed in 1919 that officially ended World War I. It imposed severe terms on Germany, including territorial losses, military restrictions, and hefty reparations payments, which later became a source of discontent and contributed to the rise of Hitler and World War II.Learn more about the Fourteen Points at
https://brainly.com/question/31309727
#SPJ4
Based on the text, how did Lorraine Hansberry’s life influence her work as a playwright?
Answer:
Lorraine Hansberry's life greatly influenced her work as a playwright. She was a prominent African American writer and civil rights activist whose experiences, perspectives, and challenges shaped the themes, characters, and social consciousness found in her plays.
History
1. Who freed the slaves?
2. How did American democracy change in the 1820's?
1. Abraham Lincoln, with the Emancipation Proclamation and the passage of the 13th Amendment, freed the slaves in the United States.
2. American democracy in the 1820s witnessed a shift toward broader suffrage and the expansion of political participation through the removal of property ownership requirements for voting in many states.
Abraham Lincoln, the 16th President of the United States, played a pivotal role in freeing the slaves. The Emancipation Proclamation, issued in 1862, declared that all slaves in Confederate-held territory were to be set free. Subsequently, the 13th Amendment to the United States Constitution was passed in 1865, permanently abolishing slavery throughout the country.
Lincoln's actions were instrumental in bringing about the emancipation of millions of enslaved individuals and marked a significant turning point in American history, leading to the eventual end of slavery in the United States.
In the 1820s, American democracy underwent changes aimed at increasing political inclusivity. Several states eliminated property ownership requirements for voting, allowing a larger segment of the population to participate in elections. This expansion of suffrage aimed to give more citizens a voice in the democratic process, reflecting a growing emphasis on the principles of equality and popular representation.
These changes set the stage for the ongoing evolution of American democracy, as efforts to widen access to political participation continued throughout the 19th and 20th centuries.
Learn more about American democracy: https://brainly.com/question/30489165
#SPJ11
Slavery in America
Answer each question with a paragraph of complete sentences of your own words. Be sure to mention specific events, people, and terms from the lesson to support your answer.
Slavery in America was a deeply entrenched institution that had a significant impact on the country's history and development.
Whast happened with slavery in the United StatesIt involved the forced labor and exploitation of African people who were brought to the American colonies starting in the 17th century. The institution of slavery was legally established in various colonies, with laws defining the status of enslaved individuals as property and denying them basic human rights.
One crucial event in the history of slavery in America was the transatlantic slave trade. European powers, such as Portugal, Spain, and England, engaged in the brutal practice of capturing Africans from their homelands, transporting them across the Atlantic Ocean, and selling them as slaves. The Middle Passage was the perilous journey that enslaved Africans endured on slave ships, where they faced unimaginable conditions, including overcrowding, disease, and violence.
Read more on slavery here https://brainly.com/question/9374853
#SPJ1
How did the Tet offensive affect the course of the war?
The Tet Offensive was an attack conducted by the North Vietnamese Army against the United States forces and the Republic of Vietnam in 1968. The purpose of the Tet Offensive was to attack major South Vietnamese and American bases throughout the South in hopes of dividing and weakening the enemy forces.
Initially, the US government declared that the Tet Offensive had been a major defeat for the North Vietnamese Army, but in reality, it was a significant victory for the North Vietnamese. Despite suffering heavy losses in the battle, the North Vietnamese Army had succeeded in their objective of launching a coordinated attack on several targets simultaneously.
The Tet Offensive was a turning point in the war, as it demonstrated that the North Vietnamese Army had the capability to mount a significant challenge to the US and South Vietnamese forces.
To know more about Tet Offensive visit:
https://brainly.com/question/1114419
#SPJ11
Explain how the terms and names in each group are related.
speculation, buying on margin, Great Depression
The Great Depression was a period of severe economic downturn that started in 1929 and lasted for over a decade. Speculation and buying on margin are two factors that played a significant role in the Great Depression.
During the 1920s, speculation was a widespread practice in the stock market. People believed that the stock market would continue to rise indefinitely and invested in the hope of making a quick profit. This led to a stock market bubble, where the prices of stocks rose far beyond their true value.Buying on margin was another practice that contributed to the Great Depression. Investors would buy stocks with borrowed money, which meant that they could control more stocks than they could afford.
This resulted in a situation where a small decline in stock prices could wipe out the entire investment. When the stock market crashed in 1929, many investors who had bought on margin were left with huge debts that they couldn't pay. As a result, they had to sell their stocks at a loss, which further drove down the stock prices, leading to a downward spiral that resulted in the Great Depression.
Know more about Speculation, here:
https://brainly.com/question/32990895
#SPJ11