What are the President's exclusive powers?.

a law providing that no legal assistant may serve on boards of directors of national banks would be Constitutional in nature.

About Law

The exact meaning of law is up for debate, but it is generally understood to be a set of regulations that are made and enforced by social or maybe a government structures to control behaviour. It has been called both a science and the practise of justice in diverse contexts. Statutes can be created by a group of legislators or a single lawmaker; the administration can issue decrees & regulations; or judges can set precedent, mainly in common law systems. Private individuals have the power to enact legally binding agreements, such as arbitration clauses that substitute alternative dispute resolution procedures for traditional court action.

To know more about common law systems:

brainly.com/question/12650394

#SPJ4

The way political parties and politicians run their campaigns, communicate with their supporters, and form alliances with other groups or people may all be impacted by the Internet.

To learn more about internet refer :

brainly.com/question/1303157

#SPJ4

Option (c), It is not often used as a basis to send this type of offender to community corrections rather than prison or jail since it would be more affordable to have him do his time there rather than in prison.

All community correctional initiatives strive to give rehabilitative services, maintain oversight of offenders, and maximize financial efficiency.

The three goals of community corrections that are most likely to be achieved are (1) assisting the offender in defining his or her situation, (2) assisting the offender in seeking assistance in accordance with the problems identified, and (3) connecting the offender with community services or organizations pertinent to the problems identified.

Community-based alternatives to prison assert that they are less expensive than prisons, more successful than traditional prisons at reducing recidivism, and less crowded than jails and prisons.

Learn more about community corrections: https://brainly.com/question/24565030

#SPJ4

The complete question is:

A heroin addict has been convicted of two counts of felony theft for stealing packages off of porches to support his habit. Which of the following is NOT a common justification for sentencing this type of offender to community corrections rather than prison or jail?

The offender is more likely to recidivate if he serves his sentence in the community rather than in prison or jail.

The offender does not pose a serious enough threat to society to be incarcerated.

It would be more cost-effective to have the offender serve his sentence in the community rather than behind bars.

The offender’s chances of being rehabilitated arebetter if he is able to maintain his ties to family and friends while serving his sentence in the community rather than having those ties broken through incarceration

The president has broad discretionary authority under Article 2 of the US Constitution to choose how to apply the law or to oversee the executive branch's resources and personnel.

Executive orders really aren't laws, and Congress does not have to approve them. An executive order is one of the most often used "presidential" papers in our current system of governance. Since George Washington assumed office in 1789, each American president has given at least one, with the total number (as of this writing) exceeding 13,731. The constitutional or legal justification for presidential orders comes from a variety of places.

To know more about executive order:

brainly.com/question/19819409

#SPJ4

Incarceration is not one of the four goals of corrections.

There are four main objectives of corrections that are frequently advocated: rehabilitation, incapacitation, deterrence, and punishment.

Over time, support for each of these objectives has fluctuated in both public and professional opinion.

An online poll was sent to the personnel of three prisons, two jails, and a jail academy in a rural mountain state in an effort to gauge the extent of professional support for these objectives.

The findings show that jail and penitentiary officials are more inclined than not to believe that incapacitation is the main objective of incarceration.

Incapacitation was frequently ranked first by respondents, then deterrent, rehabilitation, and vengeance.

A number of factors were significant predictors of staff orientation toward rehabilitation, including age, years of service, military experience, and institution type (prison or jail).

Only gender was correlated with a rehabilitation orientation for correctional officials. Only years of service and age were correlated with a rehabilitation attitude for prison staff.

To know more about Incapacitation, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/28988114

#SPJ4

From the moment it is first introduced, a legislative bill may take up to a year or more to pass through the parliamentary process. The five steps of lawmaking are as follows-

In the first step, an idea becomes a bill.

Legislation always starts as an idea. The process begins when a legislator is persuaded to draft a bill by an individual or group. The actual bill is subsequently drafted by the Legislative Counsel's Office utilizing the concepts and words that the Member supplied there. The draft bill is returned to the legislator for review. To ensure that the features they want are incorporated in the proper way, the individuals or groups who came up with the law's concept may also assess it.

The measure is sent to the policy committee in step two.

The Senate or Assembly Rules Committee will next recommend the bill to a policy committee. The policy committee has 30 days to evaluate bills when they are introduced and printed. Before the bill's hearing before the Policy Committee.

Step 3: If required, the bill is forwarded to a fiscal committee.

If the law has a financial impact or a state cost, it will be heard by the Senate or Assembly Appropriations Committees. The finance committees are concerned with the financial consequences rather than with concerns about the policy. The ACSA Governmental Relations team monitors all proposals throughout the process and writes position letters to the appropriate committees before a bill is even considered.

Step 4: After passing the first house, your bill goes to the second house.

The third reading of a bill signifies its last action in the House of Origin before proceeding to the second House, where the committee procedure will once more start. During the third reading, the author presents the measure for a vote by the entire house.

The bill is sent to the governor in step five.

A measure has 12 days to be signed by the governor, approved but not signed, or vetoed. The measure proceeds to the Secretary of State to be chaptered if it is signed or approved without a signature.

To know more about   lawmaking  click here,

https://brainly.com/question/29551618

#SPJ4

A political party's principal objective is to try to take control of the government by electing members of its own party to promote the interests of their voters and draw up party programs.

What is a political party?

A political party is a group that organizes candidates to run for office in a given nation. Parties may support particular ideologies or political objectives, and it is typical for party members to share similar political views. As contemporary party organizations evolved and spread throughout the world over the past few centuries, political parties have grown to play a significant role in the politics of practically every nation. Unpolitical parties are relatively uncommon in a nation. While some nations only have one political party, others have many. Both democracies and autocracies use parties in their political systems, however democracies often have more political parties than do autocracies.

To know more about political party check out:

https://brainly.com/question/29557623

#SPJ4

Cases involving violations of the U.S. Constitution or federal statutes (under federal-question jurisdiction) are only heard in federal courts if the United States is a party to them. cases in which the sum in dispute exceeds $75,000 involving residents of various states (under diversity jurisdiction).

The Court typically hears matters that have been determined in either an appropriate U.S. Court of Appeals or the highest Court in a certain state (if the state court decided a Constitutional issue). The Supreme Court has its own set of regulations. These regulations state that in order to accept a case, four out of the nine Justices must vote in favor of it. Cases involving the United States government, the Constitution or federal statutes, or disputes between states or between the U.S. government and other governments, fall under the purview of federal courts.

To know more about  federal court visit:

https://brainly.com/question/1384353

#SPJ4

Media. What purpose does the media play in a healthy American democracy? - Assists people in understanding what their government is doing. - Places a barrier between the populace and strong rulers.

We are made aware of a variety of social, political, and economic events taking place around the world thanks to the media. The media play a number of roles in the American political system that are crucial to the democratic process. The media provides news coverage, acts as a go-between for the populace and the government, aids in deciding which topics should be covered, and keeps people engaged in politics and society. They educate the public on specific issues and problems. They spread information about the government's policies and initiatives. They also criticize the government's controversial programs and policies. They assist in shaping public opinion.

Learn more about here

https://brainly.com/question/27175118

#SPJ4

The european union must approve draft legislation from the european commission before it becomes eu law.

A set of laws governing the EU's member states is known as European Union law. The European Union (EU) has had the mission to "promote peace, its values, and the well-being of its peoples" ever since the European Coal and Steel Community was established in the years following World War II.

All of the member states must abide by regulations as laws. As soon as they go into effect, they become a part of national law and can be enforced through the national courts of each member state.

To learn more about EU refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/9304985

#SPJ4

The two fundamental causes of the two-political party in the USA are: 1) The winner-takes-all, first-past-the-post electoral system. 2) The two main parties' inclusiveness, which leaves little room for third parties.

Senators split into opposing parties in the 1790s and the early 1800s over their support or disapproval of the policies of presidents George Washington and John Adams, particularly with regard to the nation's connections with Great Britain and France and the function of the federal government.

General mistrust, policy disagreements, and constitutional disputes between the Federalist and Democratic-Republican parties, led by Alexander Hamilton, contributed to the emergence of political parties in 1790.

To learn more about political party here:

https://brainly.com/question/29550422

#SPJ4

On Election Day and/or during early voting, eligible voters are permitted to register at the same time in nearly half of the states in the United States.

The option to register to vote in person and cast a provisional ballot right away after the cutoff for registering and casting a non-provisional ballot has passed is referred to as same-day registration. In the past, registration was restricted for the 21 days prior to an election; after that time, it was impossible to register. The 21 days prior to an election are allowed for registration under the new rule, although with restrictions. Voters who do not appear on the list of registered voters at their polling place cast provisional ballots.

Learn more about voting here:

https://brainly.com/question/3283214

#SPJ4

"Passionate" is the adjective that best describes Laertes. He learns of his father's passing in act IV and resolves to go back to Denmark. He organizes a throng and challenges Claudius after seizing the fortress.

Laertes is still described as "a very noble youth" by Hamlet. Shakespeare has made it clearly obvious throughout the play that Laertes is Hamlet's antagonist, and Hamlet understands this. Although he mimics Hamlet, he acts in the opposite way. Laertes is muscular as Hamlet is rhetorical; where Hamlet broods, Laertes blusters.

Laertes is a ferocious, compelled individual who acts without hesitation. He is courageous and willing to kill anyone who might have contributed to the death of his father. Laertes is determined to exact retribution but is not overly upset at the death of his father.

Because he desires a relationship with Ophelia, Hamlet feels envious of Laertes and Ophelia's union. Hamlet disputes with Laertes about jumping in the grave with Ophelia and claims he loves her more than her brother could ever fathom, thus I know he is envious of Laertes.

Learn more about Laertes: https://brainly.com/question/5635657

#SPJ4

Pursuit agencies use lobbyists to persuade public officials. Lobbyists are searching to get admission to public officers in all authorities branches. Lobbyists try to influence authorities officers by means of imparting facts concerning their institution's pursuits and through grassroots lobbying. Many lobbyists are former public officials.

“Lobbyist” means someone who's employed and receives payment, or who contracts for monetary attention, for the purpose of lobbying, or someone who is basically hired for governmental affairs by using some other character or governmental entity to lobby on behalf of that different person or governmental entity.

Lobbyists are professional advocates who paint to persuade political choices on behalf of people and groups. This advocacy should lead to the idea of new rules or the amendment of existing legal guidelines and rules.

Learn more about Lobbyists here https://brainly.com/question/509906

#SPJ4

The three judgements include: Reverse the lower court's decision fully and send the matter back there for a fresh trial, or affirm (uphold) the lower court's decision.

An appellate court may take as little as a month or as much as a year or more to issue its ruling or judgement. Although there is no time restriction, the typical duration is six months. The amount of time does not necessarily indicate the type of decision the court will make.

It's quite difficult to succeed on appeal. You must demonstrate that the trial court made a legal error that negatively impacted you. You must demonstrate that there was an error, not the trial court, which need not demonstrate that it was correct. So, winning an appeal is extremely difficult.

To know more about appeal court refer to:

https://brainly.com/question/11610196

#SPJ4

Voting and elections hold the people who choose the leaders of the government responsible. Government becomes accountable when it is responsible. Elections hold the government responsible to the voters who choose its representatives.

The election process doesn't begin with becoming a candidate. Successful candidates must convince voters that they are deserving of their individual votes as well as the crucial Electoral College votes. The core of a political campaign is persuading voters.

A key strategy for fostering political opportunities and increasing political involvement is elections. Political parties and community organizations have the chance to organize their supporters through electoral processes and provide other programs to the general public.

To learn more about Elections visit:

https://brainly.com/question/11185151

#SPJ4

Hamlet sees Fortinbras leading his troops through Denmark toward Poland as he travels to England. When he questions a captain, he discovers that the Norwegians intend to fight over a useless piece of land in Poland.

Act 4, Scene 4 of Hamlet in brief?

Despite being only a brief scene in Act 4, Scene 4 of Hamlet, it is important because it shows how Hamlet's character has significantly changed. Prince of Norway Fortinbras gives his captain instructions at the beginning of the scene to request King Claudius' permission before crossing his territory and entering Poland. When Rosencrantz and Guildenstern and Hamlet encounter the army while traveling to England, they start to enquire. He learns from the captain that the army is the property of young Fortinbras of Norway and that they are preparing to engage in combat over a tiny, pointless area of Poland that is of no strategic importance to either nation.

Know more about troops visit:

https://brainly.com/question/12539881

#SPJ4

Hamlet's Act III, Scene iv, where he murders Polonius because he thinks he has killed Claudius while committing a sin, is where the play's climax is located. Hamlet has been torn over whether to carry out the ghost of his father's plea for retribution throughout the entire play.

Climax When Hamlet stabs Polonius through the arras in Act III, scene iv, he exhibits blatantly violent conduct and inevitably comes in conflict with the king.

Another potential climax is provided by Hamlet's choice to devote himself entirely to violent revenge at the end of Act IV, scene 4.

Internal conflict is seen in scenes three and four of Act 3. Hamlet begins by standing back and observing Claudius enter the confessional. At this time, Hamlet had planned to kill Claudius, but he changed his mind and chose to wait.

To know more about the climax of Hamlet`s Act 3, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/29552551

#SPJ4

The Gertrude that we see in Hamlet is a woman defined by her need for station and affection as well as by her propensity to exploit men to satisfy her instinct for self-preservation. This, of course, renders her utterly reliant on the men in her life.

Gertrude never demonstrates the ability to analyze her circumstances rationally; instead, she only seems to make decisions out of instinct, like when she goes to Claudius after confronting Hamlet. She performs best in social settings because her grace and charm come off as signs of a whole, well-rounded personality.

Learn more about Hamlet here:

https://brainly.com/question/3386851

#SPJ4

In Malta, the Court of Appeal is the last court to hear an appeal in a civil case. Malta (like Cyprus) only has a single level of appeal, in contrast to several other countries that have a two-tier system (with the second appellate court typically termed the Court of Cassation or Supreme Court).

What is the Court of Appeal?

A court can consist of either one judge sitting by themselves or three judges—the Chief Justice and two other judges. The First Hall of the Civil Court, the Family Section of the Civil Court, the Court of Magistrates (Gozo) in its Superior Jurisdiction, and the Family Section of the Court of Magistrates (Gozo) in its Superior Jurisdiction are all subject to appeal when the court consists of three judges. It is commonly referred to as the Court of Appeal when there are three judges on it (Superior Jurisdiction). Additionally, this court issues the directives required for the relevant Ecclesiastical Tribunals' verdicts in marital annulment cases to be recorded and have civil effect.

To know more about Court of Appeal check out:

https://brainly.com/question/11189078

#SPJ4

This assertion is accurate. An effort will be made to undermine the political and strategic capabilities of major western countries by undermining national self-confidence, limiting national defense measures, escalating social and industrial unrest, and fostering all types of discord.

The capability, sufficiency, and interoperability of American regional allies and/or other friendly nations to support US forces in combat operations and other operations over protracted periods of time must be evaluated for the NMS report.

National security, which was first intended to be a defense against military attack, is now commonly recognised to include encompass non-military components, such as security from terrorism, lowering crime, financial stability, energy security, environmental protection, food security, and cyber security.

Learn more about National security: https://brainly.com/question/2639721

#SPJ4

Appellant is a person who lost a case in a lower court and asks judges to review that decision.

An appellant is a person who's appealing against a courtroom's choice once they have been judged responsible for a criminal offense. [law] The courtroom of enchantment upheld the appellants' convictions.

The birthday celebration who appeals from the trial court's selection. that is the celebration who misplaced in the trial court docket and needs the preferred courtroom to reverse or regulate the judgment of the trial courtroom.

Learn more about Appellant here https://brainly.com/question/1250183

#SPJ4

In 1970, the Supreme Court in Oregon v. Mitchell ruled that Congress had the right to regulate the minimum voting age in federal elections; however, it decided it could not regulate it at the local and state levels.

Vote casting is a way by using which a set, which includes a meeting or an electorate, can interact for the reason of making a collective choice or expressing an opinion generally following discussions, debates, or election campaigns. Democracies choose holders of excessive office by vote casting. because of this our government – federal, country, and nearby – is elected by means of the residents. residents vote for or their authorities officials and those officers represent the worries and thoughts of the residents in government. persons entitled to vote need to be unfastened to vote for any candidate for election and for or towards any concept submitted to referendum or plebiscite, and unfastened to support or to oppose the government, without undue have an impact on or coercion of any type which may additionally distort or inhibit the loose expression of the elector's will.

Learn more about voting here: https://brainly.com/question/21910013

#SPJ4

The First Amendment forbids placing restrictions on corporate funding of independent broadcasts during candidate elections, the Supreme Court ruled on a [tex]5-4[/tex] vote. The justices ruled that the government's justification for placing restrictions on corporate spending preventing corruption was insufficient to justify limiting political speech.

Political speech is commentary on issues of general interest. Speech "deals with matters of public concern" when it "can fairly be considered as relating to any matter of political, social, or other concern to the community," according to the Supreme Court. Political speech includes any discussion of social issues as well as speech by the government or candidates for office. Political speech is defined as speech relating to the state, government, body politic, or public administration as it relates to governmental policy-making. A political speech must contain elements that are powerful and instantly engage your audience.

Learn more about political speech here

https://brainly.com/question/1777088

#SPJ4

Fire alarm oversight is a situation in which legislators monitor a bureaucratic organization only after someone complains or a problem of implementation has been brought to their attention

Selective oversight known as "fire-alarm" oversight is sparked by citizen and interest group complaints that alert legislators to potential issues. In "policy-patrol" oversight, legislators keep an eye on policies to spot issues as they are being implemented. Comparisons are made between the "police-patrol" and "fire-alarm" oversight strategies.

Control over police patrols must be central, proactive, and direct. With the intention of identifying and correcting legislative goal violations as well as deterring such violations through its oversight, Congress selects a sample of executive agencies on its own initiative.

To learn more about fire alarm refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/25484637

#SPJ4

The principal constitutional provision that controls elections for the U.S. House of Representatives and U.S. Senate is the Elections Clause.

The state legislatures of each state shall fix the times, places, and modes of holding elections for Senators and Representatives, as provided in Article I, Section 4, Clause 1. The only exception to this norm is the locations of senatorial elections; otherwise, the Congress may, at any time, by legislation, make or modify such Regulations.

Even though the federal government is in charge of regulating federal elections, the majority of election laws are set by the states. Every state in the US, with the exception of North Dakota, has a registration requirement for residents who wish to cast a ballot. Voters register at the county or municipal level in many states.

Learn more about federal elections: https://brainly.com/question/28830672

#SPJ4

A belief that an individual should disobey unjust laws  best describes both Thoreau's and King's attitudes toward government and Civil Disobedience.

Which of these similarities between Thoreau and Martin Luther King, Jr. best "Civil Disobedience"? Both believed that people have a moral obligation to resist unfair laws.

Expert-Verified Response Thoreau's initial reaction to being detained for "civil disobedience" was that he thought  were  institutions. The people felt more free to and protest as a result of the civil disobedience.

To know more about Thoreau visit :-

https://brainly.com/question/6590105

#SPJ4

question:-

which of the following best describes both Thoreau's and king’s attitudes toward government and civil disobedience?

A. a belief that government corrupts the individual

B. a belief that an individual should disobey unjust laws

C. a promotion of self-reliance and isolation from society

D. a generally high respect for the law

According to Justice William Brennan Jr.'s 6-2 majority opinion in Baker v. Carr, federal courts may get involved in legislative apportionment disputes.

The court determined that apportionment cases are justiciable, ruling 6-2 in the plaintiffs' favor (i.e., that federal courts have the authority to get involved in these disputes).

Justice William Brennan, Jr.'s opinion for the 6-2 majority in Baker v. Carr stated that apportionment disputes could be brought before federal courts. No matter where a person lives, the case established that their vote should count equally for everyone. In the landmark 1962 decision Baker v. Carr, the U.S. Supreme Court established that federal courts could review claims that redistricting, or the drafting of electoral boundaries by a state, violates the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.

A 1901 law intended to distribute seats for the state's General Assembly, according to Baker and other Tennessee residents, was allegedly largely disregarded. Baker's lawsuit explained how Tennessee's efforts at reapportionment disregarded the state's major economic growth and population changes.

Learn more about Baker v. Carr: https://brainly.com/question/29398442

#SPJ4

This statement is true.

In the US, presidential nominees have come to represent their parties as individuals. Once in power, a president can effortlessly address and mobilize the nation over the heads of elected legislators.

The President picks the leaders of all government agencies, including the Cabinet, in order to carry out and enforce the laws passed by Congress.

The Vice President is a member of the Executive Branch and is prepared to take over as President if necessary.

In accordance with the Constitution, the president has the authority to issue pardons and reprieves, lead the armed forces, request the written advice of their Cabinet, convene or adjourn Congress, and welcome diplomats.

To know more about Congress, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/491441

#SPJ4