PLEASE HELP QUICK!!
Describe a scenario where a property owner might argue that his property is being “taken” from him by a local government because of a restriction that is put on the land. Now describe what the competing “public use” of the restriction would be.
A quarrel may be formulated by a landowner directing the dispute at the local government if they impose a zoning decree, namely if it restrains the use of his property.
What is an example?For instance, when the district decides to use it exclusively for residential purposes, the owner may feel he is being shortchanged on its value and actual utilization.
Conversely, an affirmatory case from the "public benefit" viewpoint could maintain that such regulation is essential for maintaining the safety, health, and welfare of everyone in the area.
These rules seek to reconcile the rights of personal ownership with general communal benefit through organized and productive land use, countering overcrowding, and impeding any types of nuisance or potentially perilous pursuits.
Read more about property rights here:
https://brainly.com/question/9052855
#SPJ1
Section #4: 8 points
According to your textbook, what is a “Tradeoff” in government? Include an example of your own.
Using a quote from your book and your own words, explain “Common Goods” in a few sentences.
o Find a news article that deals with the issue of “Common Goods” in the United States in the last
Five years. Summarize it here and include the news article link.
A trade-off is a situational decision in which one quality, quantity, or feature of a set or design is reduced or lost in exchange for gains in other areas.
In economics, common goods are items that are competitive and non-excludable.
A tradeoff occurs when one thing increases while another must decline. Tradeoffs result from a variety of constraints.
A common good is anything that benefits society as a whole. The bus, the roads, and the school are all common goods because they benefit everyone and are available to everyone.
A news article on Common goods state that on September 24, 2021 a Craft by Common Goods will be held at a relatively new coffee shop on Youngstown's west side. Common Goods Studio already sells a wide range of handcrafted and local artisan goods, but this weekend will feature over 50 vendors. This event was free for everyone and ran from 11 am to 4 pm.
To learn more on tradeoff, here:
https://brainly.com/question/10895386
#SPJ1
a SART examiner is also trained to
A SART examiner is also trained to gather biological evidence that may identify the perpetrator.
Who is a Sexual Assault Forensic Examiner ?A Sexual Assault Forensic Examiner can be considered as a nurse or physician Sexual Assault Forensic Examiner.
Ity should be noted that they beeing trained so that they can specialized on the provision of the forensic evidentiary examination and medical support whever it is needed under the leagal procvess, they are people that are being trained so that they can gather biological evidence which is needed duriung investigation that may identify the perpetrator in any case.
Learn more about SART examiner at:
https://brainly.com/question/23446519
#SPJ1
missing options:
gather biological evidence that may identify the perpetrator
make accurate records regarding the crime
talk to the police about the crime
compassionately comfort the victim
ICIVICS HELP ME please!!!!
The order in which Supreme Court takes cases is:
A party loses a case in a lower court and asks the Supreme Court to review the lower court's decision in a petition for a writ of certiorari.The parties write their legal arguments in briefs and submit them to the Court.Attorneys for the parties appear before the justices for an hour of oral arguments, during which the justices question the attorneys about the case.The Supreme Court sits down in a conference to discuss and vote on the case.The justices write opinions explaining the reasoning behind their decisions.The Supreme Court announces its decision in open court and issues a written opinion on the same day.What are the steps to the Supreme Court ?Upon receiving a case, the Supreme Court will welcome briefs with legal arguments submitted by the parties involved. Furthermore, should the Court agree to hear such litigation, it will proceed by issuing of writ of certiorari to the respective lower court.
This constitutes a means of reviewing its verdict. In turn, attorneys representing each party take part in the oral arguments in front of the justices. The latter are at liberty to further examine details regarding the specific case. Finally, all nine judges convene and discuss this issue thoroughly before ultimately casting their votes accordingly.
Find out on the Supreme Court at https://brainly.com/question/1046966
#SPJ1
Section #5- 6 points
Using the chart below, list four different groups or parties that nominated Presidential candidates to
run in the 2016 or 2020 Presidential elections. For three of those groups, list three of their political
priorities/platform. Cite your source(s) where you obtained the information about their priorities or
platform.
The four different parties that nominated Presidential candidates are:
Democratic PartyRepublican PartyLibertarian PartyGreen PartyWhat are the party about?In terms of Democratic Party:
Healthcare change: tells more on the Reasonable Care Act and growing get to to healthcare for all AmericansClimate alter: accepts in taking activity to combat climate alter and transitioning to clean vitality
Lastly, Social equity: tells on arrangements to advance racial and sex balance and ensure the rights of marginalized communities
Learn more about Democratic Party from
https://brainly.com/question/15677280
#SPJ1
Section #1: 9 points
Major Judicial Decisions - List three major Judicial decisions made by the Supreme Court and indicate
the impact/precedent established by the decision. Make sure that you include:
1. The name of the case and the year it was decided.
2. The background of the case...what was the case about?
3. The decision by the Supreme Court
4. The impact/precedent established by the decision.
Some of the major judicial decisions of the Supreme Court are Marbury v. Madison, McCulloch v. Maryland and Dred Scott v. Sandford .
Marbury v. Madison (1803) :
The case was about who can ultimately decide what the law is.
It was decided that determining what the law is is explicitly the province and obligation of the Judicial Department.
This judgement provided the Court the authority to overturn legislation on the basis that they are unconstitutional, a power known as judicial review.
McCulloch v. Maryland (1819)
The case was on whether Congress can establish a national bank, and if so, can a state tax this bank.
The Court ruled that Congress has implied powers to establish a national bank under the U.S. Constitution's "necessary and proper" provision. The Court also ruled that federal laws supersede state ones, and hence a state could not tax the national bank.
The McCulloch case established two significant constitutional law doctrines that are still in effect today: implied powers and federal supremacy.
Dred Scott v. Sandford (1857)
The question of this case was whether Congress had the constitutional power to prohibit slavery in free territories. A second question was whether the Constitution gave African Americans the right to sue in federal court.
The Court ruled in 1857 that Congress could not outlaw slavery in territories, and that African Americans had no right to litigate in federal court. Slaves, the Court reasoned, were "property" and hence could not be seized from their owners without due process.
The Dred Scott case became a significant issue in the argument over the expansion of slavery, fueling the fires that led to the Civil War.
To learn more on Marbury v. Madison , here:
https://brainly.com/question/29268440
#SPJ1
should citizen be able to carry a weapon?
Answer: vvvvv
Explanation:
1. It depends on the laws and regulations of the specific country or state.
2. Yes, if it is legal and regulated by appropriate authorities.
3. No, if it poses a threat to public safety or is prohibited by law.
4. It's a contentious issue with varying perspectives and opinions.
5. It's a complex topic with pros and cons that need careful consideration.
6. It's a matter of debate and policy decisions by relevant authorities.
