If you deposit a fake check, you could be held liable for the money on it. You can also be responsible for any losses the bank incurs as a result of your deposit.
What Happens If A Fake Check Is Accidentally Deposited?
If you have a bank account, an overdraft fee may probably be charged. The bank will charge you for the amount the fake check overdrew. An overdraft may cost hundreds of dollars.You might lose your job if this causes you to be fired.It will affect your credit history when you're ready to apply for new loans and mortgages.You may also be required to pay back the person who wrote the check if they lost money as a result of your depositing a fake check into their account. Restitution might be expensive to repay in order to repair the relationship with that person.To learn more about overdraft fees visit;
https://brainly.com/question/1739416
#SPJ4
The ________ consent of the member states was required for amendment of the Articles of Confederation.
The unanimous type of consent with all the member states was required for any amendment Articles of Confederation.
All 13 states would have to concur on a change because the Articles demanded unanimous assent for any amendments. That rule made it hard for the Articles to be modified after the war with Britain ended in 1783 because of the rivalry between the states. Samuel Adams, John Dickinson, Elbridge Gerry, Richard Henry Lee, John Hancock, Roger Sherman, and John Witherspoon were among the signatories.
The Articles established a grouping of independent states. On November 15, 1777, the Continental Congress ratified the Articles of Confederation, the country's first constitution. But it took until March 1st, 1781 for all thirteen states to ratify the Articles of Confederation.
Learn more about Confederation Visit: brainly.com/question/3148567
#SPJ4
What are the consequences of white-collar crime?
[tex]\huge\underline{\red{A}\green{n}\blue{s}\purple{w}\pink{e}\orange{r} →}[/tex]
Consequences of white-collar crime are given below↓
fineshome detention community confinementpaying the cost of prosecutionforfeituresrestitutionsupervised releaseimprisonmentExplanation:
Hope it helps you~the pendleton act required appointees to public office to
The Pendleton act required appointees to public office to take public examinations.
The Pendleton act was adopted in the year 1883 as a reform in civil services in United States. The Pendleton Act was enacted to appoint employees in federal government jobs on the basis of merit and the selection of these government employees through competitive exams instead of patronage. Formally know as The Pendleton civil services reform act in United States passed by the 47th united states congress and signed by the president Chester A. Arthur. The act made it illegal to fire these employees for political reasons and political pressure. Initially it covered only smaller percentage of federal jobs which are protected by such a law but later on with time and understanding to was extended to major portion of federal government jobs.
To know more about "Pendleton act" visit-
brainly.com/question/29886242
#SPJ4
what is the act of erasing or permanently destroying records called?
"Purging" is the process of permanently removing or eliminating documents. "Securely erasing" or "shredding" the records It guarantees that the data is unrecoverable and inaccessible to "destruction"
Making something utterly useless by physical or irreversible ways is known as destruction. The removal of data or records permanently from a system, storage device, or physical medium is often referred to as destruction in the context of records and data management. Destruction may be required to safeguard private or secret information, adhere to legal or regulatory obligations, or just to clear off storage space. The employment of specialised software or hardware that may overwrite, delete, or physically destroy the data is a common component of proper destruction techniques. Maintaining a transparent audit trail and ensuring accountability requires careful documenting and tracking of destruction
Learn more about "destruction"here:
https://brainly.com/question/1165953
#SPJ4
Who nominates the justices to the Supreme Court?
Answer:
the president
Explanation:
A policy of cultural expansion and the potential for political expansion by a country aimed at a group of its citizens living in neighboring countries is called
The policy of cultural expansion and potential for political expansion by a country aimed at a group of its citizens living in neighboring countries is called irredentism.
Irredentism is a political movement or ideology that seeks to return or reoccupy territory that its followers regard to be a "lost" or "unredeemed" homeland, frequently consisting of land currently governed by another country. Irredentist groups may strive to annex their claimed area or to establish a new sovereign state.
It involves advocating for the return of territories that are considered to be part of a country's national identity, but are currently controlled by another country.
For such more question on irredentism:
https://brainly.com/question/10625519
#SPJ4
Which of these descriptions is consistent with the federal system?Each of two governing layers holds ultimate authority over different matters. A confederal system of government. The colonies had no formal venue for influencing parliamentary policy. Confederal system
The descriptions that is consistent with the federal system A. Each of two governing layers holds ultimate authority over different matters.
What is the most accurate way to define a federal system?A federal government is a system in which local state governments that are interconnected with the national government and a central national government share power. The national government has power over some aspects of public life, while local governments have control over other aspects.
In federal systems, political power is split between two independent, directly elected sets of governments, one national and the other subnational.
Therefore, option A is correct.
Learn more about federal system at:
https://brainly.com/question/695831
#SPJ1
the policy which sought to remove native americans from territories they had lived in for generations was known as
The Indian Removal Act was a strategy that aimed to drive aboriginal Americans off of the lands they had inhabited for many centuries.
On May 28, 1830, President Andrew Jackson signed the Indian Removal Act into law, giving him the power to award territory west of the Mississippi River in return for Indian holdings that were already inside current state limits. A few tribes left peacefully, but the relocation policy was contested by the majority.
As the population of the United States increased, the federal government wanted to evict Native People to make room for the western expansion in this territories. The era's governmental objectives centered on evicting Native Americans from Indian Country and relocating them westward past the Mississippi River.
Learn more about territories Visit: brainly.com/question/18234493
#SPJ4
Answer:
Indian Removal
Explanation:
I took the K12 quiz
is contract law substantive law or procedural law? how about a rule specifying that a defendant has 30 days to respond to a complaint?
Contract law is a substantive law because substantive law defines and determines rights and obligations of the citizens. In view of Order VIII Rule 1 of the CPC, the defendant's entitlement to file a written statement within of 30 days following the serving of summons is undeniable.
Substantive laws are the set of statutory rules legislated by the government for the citizens, these law set forth punishment and also defines the rights and responsibilities of the citizens.
However, procedural law states how a mechanics of legal case flows at the different levels, it adheres the due process. some of the example of Substantive laws are Transfer of property act, contract act, tort etc. According to the rules of court of United States the defendant shall serve an answer within 30 days after being served with the summons and after service of initial complaint.
The Substantive Law would be a Statutory statute which outlines and regulates the citizen's legal rights and obligations. Procedural Law, sometimes known as Adjective Law, is concerned with the application of law that is governed and regulated by practice, procedure, and machinery.
To know more about "Contract law" visit-
brainly.com/question/14316157
#SPJ4
Paco Corp, a building contractor, offered to sell Roy several pieces of used construction equipment. Roy, engaged in the business of buying and selling equipment, accepted the offer. Paco's written offer had been prepared by a secretary who typed the total price as $10,900, rather than $109,000, which was the approximate fair market value of the equipment. Paco learned of the error in the offer and refused delivery of the equipment unless Roy agreed to pay $109,000. Roy sued Paco for beach of contract. Which of the following scenarios is the likely outcome?
In the situation that has been shown above, it may be stated that the Paco will be able to rescind the contract, because Roy should have known about the erroneous price of the product, is the most likely outcome. Therefore, the option A holds true.
When the contract has essentials that are completely erroneous, then the party to the contract has the option to rescind or abstain from fulfilling the contents of the contract, as the contract becomes voidable at the end of the discretion of the party related thereto.
Learn more about contract here:
https://brainly.com/question/2669219
#SPJ4
Complete question
Paco Corp., a building contractor, offered to sell Roy several pieces of used construction equipment. Roy, engaged in the business of buying and selling equipment, accepted the offer. Paco's written offer had been prepared by a secretary who typed the total price as $10,900, rather than $109,000, which was the approximate fair market value of the equipment. Paco learned of the error in the offer and refused delivery of the equipment unless Roy agreed to pay $109,000. Roy has sued Paco for breach of contract. Which of the following scenarios is the likely outcome?
Paco will be able to rescind the contract because Roy should have known that the price was erroneous.
Paco will not be liable because there has been a mutual mistake of fact.
What is the description of a federal system of government?
The political system known as federalism distributes authority among many levels of government. Federal states frequently have a minimum of three layers of government, including the federal government at the national level.
It is a substate governments at the provincial level, and municipal governments. Federalism is a form of government in which a central authority and numerous national constituent parts share power. There are at least two tiers of governance in a federation. All of these governmental tiers have a certain degree of independence from one another.
Federalism is a form of government in which two levels of authority share control over the same region. Larger territorial areas are typically governed more broadly by an overarching national government, while local concerns are handled by smaller subdivisions, states, and cities.
Learn more about federal system Visit: brainly.com/question/9892053
#SPJ4
what term is used to describe an employment practice that lacks discriminatory content but still leads to discrimination?
Disparate Impact is used to describe an employment practice that lacks discriminatory content but still leads to discrimination.
Disparate impact is a form of discrimination that occurs when an employment practice, though seemingly neutral, disproportionately affects members of a protected class, such as race, color, gender, national origin, disability, religion, or age.
While the practice itself may not be explicitly discriminatory, it has the effect of disadvantaging members of a protected class. Disparate impact can also be found in other areas such as education, housing, and lending.
It occurs when a seemingly neutral policy or practice disproportionately affects a protected class, such as race, sex, or age. This type of discrimination is prohibited under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which states that it is unlawful for employers to make decisions that have a “disparate impact” on a protected class.
To learn more about protected class link is here
brainly.com/question/13946858
#SPJ4
Bruce is charged with violating the Counterfeit Access Device and Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA). To be guilty of crime under the act, the prosecutor must prove that Bruce
a. accessed a computer without authority only.
b. accessed a computer without authority or took data.
c. accessed a computer without authority and took data.
d. took restricted or protected data only.
In the context of the situation of the context that has been provided above, it is to be stated that the prosecutor must prove that Bruce accessed a computer without an authorization. Therefore, the option A holds true.
A prosecutor is the person who has been given the responsibility of acting in either defense or proving the guilt of the plaintiff or the defendant. Moreover, the prosecutor must be putting his points in the direct interest of his or her client. This also includes to prove that his client had an unauthorized access to the computer.
Learn more about a prosecutor here:
https://brainly.com/question/12057544
#SPJ4
Criminal law actus reus arraignment bail beyond a reasonable doubt burden of proof corporate criminal liability criminal conspiracy criminal intent cruel and unusual punishment defendant double jeopardy entrapment exclusionary rule felony indictment information miranda rule misdemeanors p.136 plea p.141 plea bargain p.142 preponderance presumption of innocence p.134 probable cause p.139 prosecutor p.136 public defender p.136 search warrant p.153 search and seizure p.153 self-incrimination p.155 specific intent p.137 speedy trial p.158 warrantless arrest p.139
A Latin term meaning "guilty act," which refers to the requirement in criminal law that the defendant must have committed a voluntary act that is prohibited by law.
Bail: A sum of money paid by the defendant or a third party to secure the defendant's release from jail before trial.
Criminal conspiracy: An agreement between two or more people to commit a crime.
Defendant: The person accused of committing a crime.
Information: A formal charge filed by a prosecutor that a person has committed a crime.
Plea: A defendant's response to a criminal charge, in which he or she admits guilt (guilty plea), denies guilt (not guilty plea), or declines to contest the charges (no contest plea)
Preponderance: A lower standard of proof than beyond a reasonable doubt, which requires the prosecutor to prove the defendant's guilt to a degree that is more likely than not.
Self-incrimination: The constitutional protection against being forced to testify against oneself.
For such more question on Criminal:
brainly.com/question/9325204
#SPJ4
why did governor eugene talmadge strongly oppose president franklin d. roosevelt’s new deal programs?
Governor Eugene Talmadge strongly opposed President Franklin D. Roosevelt's new arrangement programs. They did not provide aid to farmers and they would reduce executive power. option (A) and (B) is correct.
Lead representative Eugene Talmadge firmly went against President Franklin D. Roosevelt's new arrangement during the 1930s. Around then President Roosevelt held the New Arrangement with a program to recruit different jobless individuals to work in different public areas.
This program left ranch proprietors with a lack of laborers since they liked to work in the program. The ranch proprietors whined to Lead representative Talmage which made him went against the New Arrangement.
Learn more about American history:
https://brainly.com/question/1874247
#SPJ4
This question is not complete, Here I am attaching the complete question:
Why did Governor Eugene Talmadge strongly oppose President Franklin D. Roosevelt's new deal programs? Select two.
(A) They did not provide aid to farmers.
(B) They would reduce executive power.
(C) They provided aid to African Americans.
which principle allows the national government to override state governments in certain policy areas?
The principle of federal supremacy allows national government to override the state governments in certain policy areas.
What is federal supremacy?Federal supremacy is a principle in the United States Constitution that establishes the federal government as the ultimate authority in matters of law and policy. It means that federal laws and regulations take precedence over state and local laws when there is a conflict between them. This principle is based on the Supremacy Clause of the Constitution, which states that the Constitution and federal laws shall be the supreme law of the land. The purpose of federal supremacy is to ensure uniformity and consistency in the application of federal law throughout the country, as well as to prevent states from impeding or interfering with federal government functions. However, federal supremacy is not absolute and must be balanced with the principles of federalism and state sovereignty.
To learn more about conflict, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/20372541
#SPJ1
A drawback in the use of patents to protect inventors’ rights is that they
a. confer a legal monopoly for a fixed number of years.
b. raise the price that the public pays for the products of patent holders during the time they are held.
c. a and b.
d. none of the above
Give the people a temporary legal monopoly and raise the price that they pay for the inventors' products while the patent is in force.
What is a Legal Monopoly?
A patent erects a barrier to entry and forbids any other business from producing the patented good during the patent's term. As a result, the owner of the patent is granted monopoly status and is able to increase the price of the patented items. A legal monopoly is a company that has been given monopoly status by the government. A company with a legal monopoly sets a fixed price for a particular good or service. It may be either privately run and governed by the government, or both privately run and governed by the government.
To know more about legal monopoly, visit:
brainly.com/question/5360290
#SPJ4
how did the united states acquire the land that lewis and clark explored?
The united states acquire the land that Lewis and Clark explored as they brought it from France.
The Lewis and Clark expedition started in 1804.The expedition is also known as the corps of Discovery Expedition, it was an expedition of United States to cross the newly acquired western portion of the country after the Louisiana Purchase. The secondary objects of the purchase is scientific and economic: to study the area's plants, animal life, and geography, and to establish trade with local Native American tribes. It was Jefferson achievement to acquire the Port of New Orleans.
To know more about "Lewis and Clark" visit-
brainly.com/question/20490633
#SPJ4
what happens if you unknowingly deposit a fake check
You can be responsible for the money on a fake check if you deposit it. Additionally, you could be held accountable for any losses the bank might suffer as a result of your deposit.
The Repercussions Of Accidentally Depositing A Fake Check:
If you have a bank account, you'll probably be assessed an overdraft fee. You will be charged by the bank for the amount the bogus cheque overdrew. The cost of an overdraft may be in the thousands.If you are dismissed as a result of this, you can lose your job.When you are ready to apply for new loans and mortgages, it will have an impact on your credit record.The individual who wrote the check and lost money as a result of your placement of a phony check into their account may also be entitled to reimbursement from you. Restitution can be costly to pay back in order to make things right with that individual once more.To learn more about fake checks visit;
https://brainly.com/question/30227381
#SPJ4
state courts cannot have concurrent jurisdiction with federal courts.true/false
True. State and federal courts cannot have concurrent jurisdiction over the same matter. State law problems may not be decided by federal trial courts inside a particular state, even when a federal court has jurisdiction.
The venue determines the best court location for a case. Two or more courts may have concurrent jurisdiction if all the courts have the right to hear the case. In particular, a wide range of proceedings are subject to concurrent jurisdiction in both state and federal courts in the United States.
When a crime begins in one state and is continued in one or more other jurisdictions, for example, concurrent jurisdiction occurs, allowing both state and federal courts to hear the case.
Learn more about jurisdiction Visit: brainly.com/question/10377896
#SPJ4
What was the key reason for the creation of law courts during the early development of the English common law?A) to administer law in a uniform mannerB) to help merchants form a standardized set of commercial lawsC) to increase the power of the king in law-makingD) to facilitate legal disputes for the wealthy and influential
The key reason for the creation of law courts during the early development of the English common law was to administer law in a uniform manner. (Option A)
Prior to the creation of law courts, laws were administered by local lords and their decisions were not consistent across different regions. This led to a lack of uniformity in the administration of laws and confusion among the people. The creation of law courts allowed for a centralized system of law administration and ensured that laws were applied consistently across the country.
This also helped to establish the principle of precedent, where decisions made by the law courts in one case would be applied to similar cases in the future. Hence, the creation of law courts during the early development of the English common law was primarily for the purpose of administering law in a uniform manner and establishing the principle of precedent.
Learn more about Common law:
https://brainly.com/question/7413269
#SPJ11
An example of an asset is everfi
An example of an asset, are a car, money, and time. Where and when you work is entirely up to you.
What is the definition of an asset?
A resource having economic worth that a person, business, or nation possesses or controls with the hope that it would someday be useful is referred to as an asset.
The balance sheet of a business lists assets. They're classified as current, fixed, financial, and intangible. They are acquired or produced in order to raise a company's value or improve the operations of the company.
Whether it's manufacturing equipment or a patent, an asset can be viewed of as anything that, in the future, can generate cash flow, lower expenses, or increase sales.
To learn more about asset visit;
https://brainly.com/question/14404094
#SPJ1
Correct question:
What is an example of an Everfi asset, in the same vein?
Which law states that the volume of a gas is directly proportional to the number of moles of gas when the temperature and pressure are held constant?
The Ideal Gas Law states that the volume of a gas is directly proportional to the number of moles of gas when the temperature and pressure are held constant.
The Ideal Gas Law states that the pressure multiplied by the volume of a given mass of an ideal gas is equal to the product of the gas' absolute temperature and its molar mass.
Mathematically, this can be expressed as P*V = n*R*T, where P is pressure, V is volume, n is the number of moles, R is the ideal gas constant, and T is the temperature.
To learn more about Ideal Gas Law link is here
brainly.com/question/28257995
#SPJ4
critically examine te meaning and concept of nation,nationalities and peoples stated under article 39(5) of the fdre constitution vs the modern thouthts of nation and nationalism?
what action was authorized by the lend-lease act?
Answer:ok
Explanation:
Which of the following standards of proof is more than a gut feeling and legally permits a law enforcement officer to stop and frisk a suspect?a. rebuttable presumption
b. reasonable suspicion
c. conclusive presumption
d. mere suspicion
The standard of proof that is more than a gut feeling and legally permits a law enforcement officer to stop and frisk a suspect is "reasonable suspicion".
Reasonable suspicion is a legal requirement that authorises law enforcement authorities to detain and investigate a person for a short period of time if they have specific and articulable evidence that indicate the person may be involved in criminal conduct. A reasonable suspicion requirement is lower than probable cause, which is necessary for a full arrest or search. An officer must have more than a hunch or a subjective emotion to reach the bar of reasonable suspicion, but less than the degree of proof required for probable cause. The particular facts that give rise to reasonable suspicion can vary based on the circumstances of each individual case.
For such more question on law:
https://brainly.com/question/820417
#SPJ4
What term is used to refer to the individual who files a complaint?
A complainant, or a plaintiff, is the term that is being used in the essence of referring to the individual who tends to file a complaint against an individual or a group.
A plaintiff may be time and again taken into consideration as the person who has been given the responsibility of making a complaint against an individual for the inconvenience or harm caused to him or her by an individual. The person against whom the individual files a complaint is known as the defendant. Both the plaintiff and defendant defend their views in the court of law.
Learn more about a plaintiff here:
https://brainly.com/question/29213554
#SPJ4
Which U.S. Constitutional amendment gives state governments plenary power? a. Fourth b. Sixth c. Tenth d. Fourteenth.
The correct option is C, Tenth Amendment according to it the U.S. Constitutional amendment gives state governments plenary power. It states that any powers not delegated to the civil government nor banned by the Constitution are reserved for the countries or the people.
It means that countries have the authority to regulate and govern a wide range of areas, similar as education, transportation, and felonious justice, as long as their conduct don't discord with civil law or the Constitution. The Fourth Amendment protects citizens from unreasonable quests and seizures.
The Sixth Amendment guarantees the right to a fair trial, and the Fourteenth Amendment provides equal protection under the law and due process
To learn more about Tenth Amendment:
https://brainly.com/question/10450442
#SPJ4
After reviewing Whitehead v. Usa-One, Inc. 595 So. 2d 867 (Ala. 1992), do you believe USA-ONE had a legal duty to protect Whitehead and Prewett from sexual assault or do you agree with the Court? Explain.
The word court comes from the French cour, an enclosed yard, which derives from the Latin form cōrtem, the accusative case of cohors, which again means an enclosed yard or the occupants of such a yard.
What is the meaning of Court?A court, often known as a court of law, is a person or group of people with the power to hear and decide issues involving civil, criminal, ecclesiastical, or military conflicts.
The Latin form crtem, the accusative case of cohors, which again implies an enclosed yard or the tenants of such a yard, is derived from the French word cour, which signifies an enclosed yard.
Learn more about the Court here:
https://brainly.com/question/5684503
#SPJ1
Which Supreme Court decision established the principle that the federal government rather than the individual state governments has authority to deal with American Indian affairs?
answer choices
a. Marbury v. Madison
b. Worcester v. Georgia
c. McCulloch v. Maryland
d. Gibbons v. Ogden
The underlying notion that American Indian issues are a federal government subject, not a matter for each state government, was established by the Supreme Court's decision in Marbury v. Madison.
A federal government was essentially built as a means of transferring power from the wealthy to the disadvantaged. A country's larger, more potent central government shares authority with the country's smaller state and regional governments. This is achieved by assigning specific tasks to each sector, providing the federal government, states, and localities their own jobs to execute.
According to the United States Constitution, the federal government must continue to have control over a variety of tasks, including, to name a few, the creation of money, the establishing of subordinate courts, and the granting of patents. Another example of a federal government duty is the power to declare war.
To learn more about federal government visit;
https://brainly.com/question/371257
#SPJ4
