What is quantitative identity in Philosophy?

Answer:

Explanation:

1.) a case in which citizens of one state challenge citizens of another state.

The Constitution grants the Supreme Court original jurisdiction in cases involving disputes between two or more states, also known as "cases affecting ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls, and those in which a state shall be a party." Therefore, the Supreme Court has original jurisdiction over a case in which citizens of one state challenge citizens of another state.

The Supreme Court generally does not have original jurisdiction in criminal cases, such as a case in which a person robs a grocery store or an individual is accused of murdering someone.

C. It revealed the country's economic dependency on other nations.

Answer:

C. Original work from identical duplication.

Explanation:

Copyright Act 1974 protects any original, work, thought or idea from being duplicated in order to protect the owner of the original work and to have them get credit.

Answer:

In the movie "Schindler's List," Oskar Schindler describes himself as a businessman and claims that he is good at making money. He believes that his business acumen and connections with Nazi officials can be used to his advantage in helping to protect the Jewish workers in his factory from persecution and death.

Schindler initially views his actions as a way to profit from the war and exploit the labor of the Jewish workers, but as he witnesses the atrocities committed against them, he becomes more compassionate and begins to see them as people rather than just a means to an end.

As the war continues, Schindler puts his business skills to work in order to save as many Jewish workers as possible, often at great risk to himself. He uses his influence with Nazi officials to secure the release of workers from concentration camps and ultimately spends his entire fortune bribing officials and providing for the Jewish workers in his factory.

Answer:

In the movie Schindler's List, Oskar Schindler says he is good at making money.

Explanation:

Answer:B

Explanation:

It is unclear which Lincoln-related anecdote Congressman Bennie Thompson, a member of the US House of Representatives, was alluding to without more details.

Nevertheless, Abraham Lincoln is a well-known historical person in the United States, and there are several tales and anecdotes about him that are frequently used as examples or sources of inspiration for other endeavors. Congressman Bennie Thompson may have used a tale about Lincoln to illustrate a point, motivate his audience, or call attention to Lincoln's leadership skills, depending on the circumstances and the content of his speech.

Learn more about Congressman Bennie Thompson here:

https://brainly.com/question/30860799

#SPJ1

Answer:

Remus.

Explanation:

According to Roman mythology, the twin brothers who founded Rome were named Romulus and Remus. Romulus eventually became the first king of Rome.

Answer:

Sending immediately a support question without bothering to consult the FAQ is not an acceptable practice when learning to use Microworkers. It's important to first check the FAQ page to see if the answer to the question is already available before reaching out to support.

Answer:

Dear Plebeian,

I hope this letter finds you well. I wanted to take a moment to address the recent conflict of the orders and how it has impacted my political power as a Patrician.

Firstly, as a result of the conflict of the orders, the Patricians were able to maintain their control over the government. The Plebeians demanded a greater role in the government and as a compromise, they were given their own representatives called Tribunes. However, these Tribunes did not have the power to make laws, only to veto them. This ensured that the Patricians would continue to have a strong say in the government.

Secondly, the conflict of the orders also allowed for greater political power within the Patrician class. The Plebeians were granted the right to marry Patricians, which allowed for greater social mobility. However, this did not mean that the Patricians lost their exclusive rights to hold high offices and participate in government affairs. In fact, many Plebeians who married into Patrician families often adopted the Patrician way of life and continued to support the Patrician class.

Lastly, the conflict of the orders led to the creation of the Law of the Twelve Tables, a set of laws that applied to all Roman citizens. This was a significant improvement in political power as it created a standardized legal system that was not subject to the whims of individual magistrates. This helped to ensure that Patricians were not unfairly targeted by biased judges.

In conclusion, the conflict of the orders may have seemed like a victory for the Plebeians, but it also had significant benefits for the Patrician class. It allowed us to maintain our control over the government, improve our social standing, and establish a fair and just legal system. I hope this letter has helped you to understand our position and the benefits that have come from the conflict of the orders.

Sincerely,

A Patrician

Answer:

Appeasement was a policy adopted by European powers towards Hitler's actions in the 1930s, which involved giving in to his demands in an attempt to avoid war. The policy was motivated by the fear of another world war, given the devastation caused by World War I, and the belief that Hitler's demands were reasonable and could be satisfied without the need for military action.

One example of appeasement was the Munich Agreement of 1938, in which France and Great Britain agreed to let Germany annex the Sudetenland region of Czechoslovakia, with the hope that this would satisfy Hitler's territorial ambitions and prevent war. Another example was the Anschluss of Austria, in which Germany annexed Austria in 1938 without any significant opposition from other European powers.

The response of the leaders from France and Great Britain at the time was to adopt a policy of appeasement towards Hitler's aggressive actions. The French leader, Édouard Daladier, and the British Prime Minister, Neville Chamberlain, believed that appeasement would prevent another devastating war and that Hitler's territorial demands were reasonable.

However, this policy of appeasement ultimately failed, as Hitler continued to expand his territory and increase his military power. The invasion of Poland in 1939 finally led to the outbreak of World War II.

In hindsight, the world should have reacted differently to Hitler's actions in the 1930s. Instead of appeasement, a more firm and united response from European powers, particularly France and Great Britain, could have deterred Hitler and prevented the outbreak of war. For instance, economic sanctions or a military alliance could have been formed to counter Hitler's aggression. The lack of a strong and united response allowed Hitler to pursue his ambitions and ultimately led to the devastation of World War II.

Answer:

B) The sound was hard to sync with the image.

Explanation:

The main reason early attempts at matching sound to film, which involved separate recordings played while the film played, did not work was that the sound was hard to synch with the image. This was because the recordings were played on a separate machine and the synchronization of the sound and the image was often difficult to maintain, resulting in a disjointed and unconvincing viewing experience. As a result, the development of synchronized sound and image technology was crucial to the success of the motion picture industry and the rise of "talkies."

Answer:

A. The march of freedom and democracy … will leave Marxism-Leninism on the ash heap of history.

C. The Soviet Union was nothing less than an "evil empire."

D. A battle between good and evil, freedom and tyranny, truth and lies.

Explanation:

This has absolutely nothing to do with history but I'm answering this just for the fun of it.

158,137,511 is their exact sub count, they gain subscribers every second so it's just the most recent sub count that I saw.

Answer:

Cocomelon

Subscribers 153 million

Total views 150 billion

Creator Awards 100,000 subscribers 2014 1,000,000 subscribers 2016 10,000,000 subscribers 2018 50,000,000 subscribers 2019 100,000,000 subscribers 2020.

Last updated: February 4, 2023

..................

By controlling variables that may influence the response variable, we reduce variability in the response variable.

A response variable is a variable that is being measured or observed in an experiment or study. It is the variable that researchers are keen on understanding or predicting, and its value is said to depend on the independent variables or factors being studied.

It is key to define the response variable deeply to ensure that it actually demonstrates the phenomenon being researched and can be analyzed appropriately to draw meaningful conclusions.

learn more about response variable: https://brainly.com/question/22046153

#SPJ1

The complete question goes thus:

A sunscreen manufacturer tests a new water-resistant sunscreen by finding 120 volunteers at a community pool. The subjects are randomly assigned to one of two groups by drawing either a 1 or 2 marked on slips of equal-sized paper from a bag. Half of the subjects use an old formulation, and half use the new formulation over an 8-hour time frame on the same sunny day. Test administrators apply a measured amount of sunscreen to each subject at the beginning of the day and reapply it at regular intervals throughout the day. Test subjects are asked to remain in unshaded areas as much as possible during the test. The levels of sunburn are compared at the end of the day.

Which of the following accurately describes the benefit, if any, of control in the experiment?

Answer:massive U.S. defense expenditures to counter the worldwide Soviet threat.

Explanation:

Due to Atlanta's expanding metropolitan region, foreign businesses are moving there. As a result, choice (A) is right.

A heavily populated urban agglomeration and its surrounding areas that share infrastructures, commercial districts, transportation businesses networks, and housing make up a metropolitan area, or metro.

A metro area typically consists of several major cities, jurisdictions, and municipalities, including counties, districts, townships, boroughs, cities, towns, exurbs, suburbs, and even states and countries like the eurodistricts.  

metropolitan region have evolved into important economic and political centers as social, economic, and political institutions have altered of the world and its society and it is concluded

Learn more about  metropolitan region, from :

brainly.com/question/26628826

#SPJ1

Answer:

A. The bomb's destructive power might end the war quickly.

Explanation:

The United States had two options in terms of ending the war with Japan. The first was the initiation of what is termed as "Operation Downfall", which saw to the use of almost 1.7 million US troops and almost 10 million Japanese, both in the military branch, as well as armed civilians (due to Japan's culture and usage of the Bushido Code, which essentially called for any Japanese to fight to the death and to take one's own life instead of surrendering.

The other option, which is the option that was taken, is the usage of the atomic bombs that were developed under the Manhattan Project, and was targeted at Hiroshima, Kokura, Niigata, and Nagasaki, with Hiroshima and Nagasaki being the final destinations. The first atomic bomb which was dropped on Hiroshima, was dubbed "Little Boy", and ignited by firing a Uranium-235 into another, resulting in a fission chain reaction. The second atomic bomb, dropped on Nagasaki, was dubbed "Fat Man", in which High Explosives was fired into the Plutonium, creating a nuclear explosion.

What is noteworthy is that the United States really only had 2 atomic bombs and a third one under developed, but was able to bluff their way in creating the assumption that they had a large stock of nuclear weapons. This led to the eventual surrender of Japan in September 2, 1945.

Learn more about World War II, here:

https://brainly.com/question/8605481

Abraham Lincoln was assassinated in 1865. He was the driving force behind Reconstruction. He implemented a number of policies to heal the wounds of the civil war and address the systemic problems of racism and inequality. After his death, this vision faded and the country did not find a clear direction.

The assassination of President Abraham Lincoln in 1865 had a profound impact on the United States. Some believe his death left a void that national reconstruction cannot fill. While others believe the administration could have continued without Lincoln, I believe his death dealt a significant blow to the nation's ability to heal and rebuild.

First, Lincoln was the driving force behind Reconstruction, with the goal of unifying the country and rebuilding the South. He implemented a number of policies to heal the wounds of the civil war and address the systemic problems of racism and inequality. After his death, this vision faded and the country did not find a clear direction. At the same time, Lincoln was an integral figure respected by both Republicans and Democrats.

He had a special compromising quality that brought together the people necessary for the success of reconstruction. With his death, there was no one left to fill this leadership void and the country was torn apart.

Opponents of this claim may argue that Lincoln's reconstruction plans were flawed and that his death did not significantly affect America's ability to rebuild. However, there are obvious weaknesses in this argument. Lincoln's policies had limited success, and his death left a significant leadership vacuum that prevented further progress.

Ultimately, I believe the death of President Lincoln left a void in America that Reconstruction could not fill. Lincoln's vision, leadership, and ability to bring people together were essential to the success of Reconstruction.

Without him, the country lacks clear direction and leadership, slowing progress and hindering the country's ability to heal and rebuild.

learn more about Abraham Lincoln: https://brainly.com/question/856804

#SPJ1

Answer:

"Economic liberty" generally refers to the freedom of individuals and businesses to engage in economic activities without interference from the government or other external forces. It encompasses the ability of individuals to own and control property, enter into contracts, make voluntary exchanges, and pursue economic opportunities of their choosing. Economic liberty is often associated with free-market capitalism and is considered a fundamental component of economic growth and development. It is also closely linked to the concept of individual liberty and is seen by some as a key element of a free and democratic society. However, there is ongoing debate about the extent to which economic liberty should be prioritized over other societal values, such as social justice and equality.

Answer:  All of the above.

Explanation:

Answer:Both the Walk on Washington Movement led by A. Philip Randolph and the Brown v. Board of Education decision were significant in the Civil Rights Movement and had a significant impact on the movement's progress.

The Walk on Washington Movement, which took place in 1941, was organized by Randolph to protest discrimination in employment and the armed forces. The movement was successful in pressuring President Franklin D. Roosevelt to sign Executive Order 8802, which prohibited racial discrimination in the defense industry and federal government.

On the other hand, the Brown v. Board of Education decision, delivered by the U.S. Supreme Court in 1954, declared that segregation in public schools was unconstitutional. The decision marked a significant legal victory for the Civil Rights Movement and sparked a wave of activism and protest that continued throughout the 1950s and 1960s.

While both the Walk on Washington Movement and the Brown v. Board of Education decision were important milestones in the Civil Rights Movement, it is difficult to determine which had a greater influence. The Walk on Washington Movement was important in securing employment opportunities for African Americans, while the Brown v. Board of Education decision was a landmark legal victory that challenged the system of segregation in the United States. Both were critical in the fight for civil rights and played a significant role in advancing the movement.

Explanation:

The second great awakening was when a man found a rock and got paid for giving it away it helped him and his family but progressed badder and badder causing major fights to occur and could've ended in war

A social reform movement:

Climbing a wall/An act of bravery

Primary sources: They are different from secondary sources because primary sources are a first source and secondary source is a second source.

Can you please give brainly it's okay if not!

1. The Second Great Awakening was a religious revival movement that took place in the United States during the early 19th century. It emphasized personal salvation, emotional preaching, and individual responsibility. The movement aimed to renew people's faith and promote moral and social reform. As a result, new religious denominations emerged, and there was an increase in evangelism, camp meetings, and the promotion of social causes such as abolitionism and temperance.

2. A social reform movement is a collective effort by a group of people who seek to bring about positive change in society by addressing social issues or inequalities. These movements aim to improve living conditions, promote equality, and advocate for the rights of marginalized groups. An example of a social reform movement is the civil rights movement in the United States during the mid-20th century. This movement fought against racial segregation and discrimination, with leaders like Martin Luther King Jr. advocating for equal rights through nonviolent means.

3. Primary sources are original materials or firsthand accounts created by individuals who directly witnessed or participated in an event. They provide direct evidence of the topic being studied. Examples of primary sources include diaries, letters, photographs, interviews, and speeches. On the other hand, secondary sources are interpretations or analysis of primary sources. They are created by authors who did not directly witness the events or phenomena being discussed. Secondary sources often summarize, interpret, or provide analysis of primary sources. Examples of secondary sources include textbooks, scholarly articles, and documentaries. The main difference between primary and secondary sources is that primary sources offer direct evidence, while secondary sources provide an interpretation or analysis of that evidence.

Colonel Robert Gould Shaw made mistakes at the beginning of Glory.

He at last went with the decision to submit to the order. He informed his father of his decision on February 6. He was 25 at the time.   Colonel Shaw's decision to  antedate his  payment demonstrates his belief that all  anyhow of their skin color, are created equal. .

Learn more about Colonel Robert Shaw:

https://brainly.com/question/31408717

#SPJ1

The choice to use the atomic bomb had additional political and strategic repercussions, such as the arms race and the Cold War, which influenced world politics for decades to come.

The author's choice to drop the atomic bomb had a significant impact on how war is fought, posing ethical dilemmas regarding the use of WMDs and the duty of leaders to safeguard civilians.

On August 6, 1945, Japan's Hiroshima was struck by the first atomic bomb. August 9, 1945, saw the detonation of the second bomb over Nagasaki. With the job achieved, the Japanese capitulated.

As  a result, the significance of the  Russia does the author not agree with are the aforementioned.

Learn more about on atomic bomb, here:

https://brainly.com/question/28739270

#SPJ1

Psychologists who abide by professional conduct guidelines are guided by the American Psychological Association's (APA's) Code of Ethics.

This code provides a roadmap for ethical principles and standards.

The APA's comprehensive code consists of five core principles:

1. Beneficence and Nonmaleficence: Psychologists prioritize their clients' well-being without causing undue harm;

2. Fidelity and Responsibility: Psychologists establish rapport with those in their care, accept responsibility for their actions, and foster appropriate working relationships;

3. Integrity: Mental health professionals aspire to maintain accurate, truthful, and honest communications in their practice;

4. Justice: The concept of justice aims to offset any prejudices or discrimination that may impact the delivery of psychological services;

5. Respect for People's Rights and Dignity: Practitioners respect individual rights and dignity throughout service provision and promote their clientele’s general welfare.

Learn more about ethics on

https://brainly.com/question/13969108

#SPJ1

Answer:The 1860 election results highlighted the growing tensions between the Northern and Southern states over the issue of slavery. Abraham Lincoln, a Republican who was opposed to the expansion of slavery into the western territories, won the election with almost no support from the Southern states, which had threatened to secede if a Republican was elected.

The election also highlighted the increasing sectionalism in the country, as Lincoln's support came largely from the North and West, while his opponents, John C. Breckinridge of the Southern Democratic Party and John Bell of the Constitutional Union Party, drew their support primarily from the South and the border states.

In addition, the election revealed the growing influence of third-party movements, as the Republican Party, which had only been formed in 1854, emerged as a major political force and succeeded in capturing the presidency in its first national election.

Explanation:

The election results of 1860 clearly reflect the deep sectional divisions and political polarization that characterized pre-Civil War politics in the United States.

In the election of 1860, four major candidates ran for president: Abraham Lincoln of the Republican Party, John C. Breckinridge of the Southern Democratic Party, Stephen A. Douglas of the Northern Democratic Party, and John Bell of the Constitutional Union Party.

Lincoln, who opposed the expansion of slavery into new territories, won the election with a majority of the electoral votes but only 39.8% of the popular vote, as his support was mainly concentrated in the North.

Learn more about Civil War, here

https://brainly.com/question/11874600

#SPJ1