The district court clearly instructed the jury as "Chance Hester was a government leader of petitioner Paramount Parks, Inc." in its judgment on the 1983 claim, which included this finding.
What is Austin v. Paramount Parks?The jury found Austin not guilty of Austin's state-law claim of malicious prosecution. The ruling mandates that the newly established firms be free of any prior managerial ties to one another or the plaintiff and that they have no common managers.
After Austin's testimony, Paramount filed a motion for justice and the rule of law regarding each of the six charges in accordance with Rule 50(a) of both the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure.
The motion made by Paramount after the conclusion of all the evidence was also rejected by the district court. In addition, the district court declared that Hester qualified as a "policymaker" for Paramount for such reasons of 1983 liability.
Learn more about Austin v. Paramount Parks, Here:
brainly.com/question/28168634
#SPJ1
According to the US Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) and Department of Homeland Security (DHS), which of the following is a possible sign that someone is a victim of human trafficking?
a. The person is very familiar with the neighborhood
b. The person lives far away from the work premises
c. The person often moves among various work sites
d. The person appears to travel alone very frequently
Out of the given choices, it may be stated that when a person often moves among various work sites, then it is a possible sign that he or she is a victim of human trafficking as per the US Federal Bureau of Investigation, and the Department of Homeland Security. Therefore, the option C holds true.
The practice of human trafficking is a common crime relevant in the American society. This has existed in the American society ever since the practices of slavery were active. However, after an amendment in the constitution, this practice of human trafficking has been termed as illegal.
Learn more human trafficking here:
https://brainly.com/question/28182536
#SPJ4
The ethical principle of _____ has been violated if a researcher decides to place participants he finds more attractive into the experimental condition he believes has the greatest benefit.
Choose matching definition
O informed consent
O justice
O power
O respect for persons
The ethical principle of justice has been violated if a researcher decides to place participants, he finds more attractive into the experimental condition he believes has the greatest benefit.
You must follow the ethical guidelines established by regulatory organisations in order to safeguard study participants, the general public, and the researcher themselves. If a researcher chooses to place volunteers into the experimental condition, he thinks would be most beneficial, he has broken the ethical norm of justice.
Research ethics are moral principles that aid researchers in carrying out and disseminating their work without lying or purposely or unintentionally harming study participants or other members of society. You may ensure that your study is honest and authentic by upholding ethical standards, which will also boost your credibility and get more public support.
To know more about research, refer to the following link:
https://brainly.com/question/26057974
#SPJ4
why do you suppose the clery family pressed the federal government to pass the clery disclosure of campus security policy and campus crime statistics act?
Public and private colleges and universities are required by the Jeanne Clery Disclosure of Campus Security Policy and Campus Crime Statistics Act, or the Clery Act, to provide information on specific crimes that take place on or near campus.
Colleges and universities are required by the Campus Crime Awareness and Campus Security Act of 1990, as amended (also referred to as the "Clery Act"), and the Campus Fire Safety Right-to-Know Act, both of which were passed into law in 2008, to give timely warnings of crimes that pose a threat to the campus community and to publish an annual security report. without the victim's consent, particularly when the victim is unable to give consent.
To learn more about Campus, click here.
https://brainly.com/question/30005813
#SPJ4
does meaningless nickname as username personal information?
No, meaningless nickname as a username is not considered personal information. Personal information is information that can be used to identify a specific individual, such as full name, address, social security number, etc. A meaningless username does not have any of these identifying characteristics and therefore is not considered personal information.
However, it's important to note that in certain contexts, a username can still be considered personal information, such as when it is combined with other information that can identify an individual. For example, if a username is combined with an email address, the combination could be considered personal information. It is important to understand the context and how information is being used in order to determine whether it is considered personal information.
Learn more about personal information here:
https://brainly.com/question/30023243
#SPJ4
Which type of clause describes the following statement: "We have issued the policy in consideration of the representations in your applications and payment of the first-term premium".
The consideration clause describes the following statement: "We have issued the policy in consideration of the representations in your applications and payment of the first-term premium".
Consideration clauses are employed to specify the overall sum required for the transaction at hand.
They are the conditions and terms that specify how compensation is distributed in return for equal consideration.
Some consideration clauses involve sanctions if one party doesn't fulfil their obligations.
Consideration clauses are frequently used in contracts for real estate and insurance. In essence, they provide the conditions under which one party pays another party for a valued item, such as a house or insurance policy.
As part of a share purchase agreement, they could also be applied when selling shares to a buyer.
Consideration clauses in this situation demonstrate the existence of reciprocal consideration.
To know more about the consideration clause, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/14550374
#SPJ4
historicalOne of the most often used guidelines for shaping the law is tradition, or custom, which is also called the ______ school of legal interpretation.
One of the most often used guidelines for shaping the law is tradition, or custom, which is also called the historical school of legal interpretation.
The Historical School of Jurisprudence is one of the legal schools, second only to Natural Law. The foundation of this rule is also fairly intricate. Each person has a different level of understanding. In other words, everyone applies their own interpretation of the law. The legislation also holds the view that the development of law over many years is what makes it what it is today.
In addition, the legislation was developed and formed based on public awareness. However, awareness has existed since the dawn of mankind. According to the historical school of law theory, the law arises from earlier causes and influences.
The correct question is, "One of the most often used guidelines for shaping the law is tradition, or custom, which is also called the ______ school of legal interpretation."
Learn more about Law here:
https://brainly.com/question/820417
#SPJ4
In a lawsuit involving a car crash, the day on which the crash occurred would be considered a material fact. False
What issues and/or policy areas would interest you as a Congressional intern and why?
I am interested in what role science plays in government. Also, if chosen to participate in this program, it would be an honor to represent Texas Tech as a future tier one research institution.
I would be interested in working in the office of a congressperson that sits on the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology. If the USA is to remain a superpower, then it is this committee that will play a major role in preventing us from becoming a superpower of some bygone golden age. Bottom line, more funding needs to be allocated to universities for research. Research labs should not have to turn to industry to provide funding for what the government should be doing.
Also, I am very interested in policy issues that are deemed controversial. I am very open on the stance that I take on some of these issues. I care about gay rights, but there is one other issue that I am more concerned with above all else. That issue is abortion. This is a legitimate issue that our government always struggles with from election to election. Everybody has an opinion on this issue, but yet people would rather deem it taboo. I know touchy subject and probably something an applicant should not touch in an application. However, I think it is far more dangerous to just ignore the issue and not talk about it. On the issue of abortion, I have always taken the stance that I don’t care about abortion in other parts of the world, but here in the USA, we can care for our own.
I am curious about what function learning plays in management. Also, if preferred to take part as a Congressional intern, it is hopefully an honor to show Texas Tech as a future-level individual research organization.
I am hopefully concerned in active in the commission of a legislator that sits on the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology. The bottom line, more capital needs to be expected assigned to academies for research. Research labs concede the possibility not should count on manufacturing to determine capital for that reason the administration endure be an achievement.
This is a valid issue that our management forever struggles accompanying from voting to choosing. Everybody has a belief on this issue, but still, the population favors regards it as taboo. On the issue of failure, I have continually captured the posture that I don’t care about failure in additional parts of the experience, but present in the USA, we can take care of our own.
To know more about legislator refer to: https://brainly.com/question/29329556
#SPJ4
aubrey carson was recently hired by a local cpa firm. her first assignment is to create a tax memorandum explaining the different sources of tax law and where their authority comes from. research and cite the appropriate irc section that authorizes the treasury secretary to provide administrative interpretation of the tax law.
Explanation:
The government seams to have a new meaning, for new tax laws, which mostly favors the authors of the law. However the section that authorizes the treasury secretary to give his own interpretation , most likely the I. R. S. Zar.
what are the effects of the quorum, notice of meeting and rules of voting were not complied with?
If the quorum, notice of meeting and rules of voting are not complied with, then the meeting can be taken at a second call or be rendered as invalid.
In any case, if the quorum and other rules are not sufficiently met, then the meeting can be held as invalid and the same agenda is to be presented at another meeting.
According to the corporate charter, a quorum is the minimal number of stakeholders in a corporation that must be present for a meeting to be valid.
Before the board may make any modifications, this paragraph or general agreement guarantees there is adequate representation present at meetings. according to best standards, a quorum should be defined as a simple majority of the members of an organisation.
A company's bylaws may also provide a strict number, which, if it is higher than the simple majority, takes precedence.
To know more about Board meetings, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/12942704
#SPJ4
determine which argument is valid. if the argument is valid, give a proof using the laws of logic
An argument is composed of a number of opening claims, known as premises, and a conclusion. An argument is true if and only if the conclusion is true in every argument where all of the premises are true.
If the premises and conclusion are connected in such a way that if the premises were true, then the conclusion would also have to be true, then the argument is considered valid. Assess the logic rather than the material (true or false statements). Think fictitiously. Ask yourself, "Are we forced to the conclusion IF the premises are true?" If the answer is yes, the defence is sound. If the answer is no, the argument is false. An argument includes premises as well as a conclusion. A formal proof of validity is the comprehensive depiction of a valid argument's phases and conclusion (in symbolic logic) such that the lines of reasoning may be followed. For instance, if the grass is soggy, it is raining.
To learn more about argument click the link below:
brainly.com/question/27100677
#SPJ4
A bicyclist sued a motorist in federal court sitting in diversity jurisdiction for damages resulting from an accident. The complaint alleged that the accident was caused by the motorist's negligence and sought damages in a specific amount. The motorist, in his answer, specifically denied allegations in the complaint that related to his liability, but did not address the allegations relating to damages sought by the bicyclist. Consequently, the bicyclist contends that the motorist has conceded the issue of damages.Is the bicyclist correct?
A
No, because the failure to deny an allegation relating to the amount of damages does not deem that allegation admitted.
B
No, because in a tort action, the denial of allegations relating to liability is treated as a denial of allegations relating to damages.
C
Yes, because, as the defendant specifically denied allegations relating to liability, failure to deny the allegations relating to damages is treated as an admission.
D
Yes, because an allegation in the plaintiff's complaint is deemed admitted if not denied by the defendant.
A federal trademark belonging to the plaintiff was allegedly violated by the defendant, and $55,000 in damages were demanded in the complaint.
What two situations would not fall within federal jurisdiction based on diversity of citizenship?In accordance with 28 U.S.C. 1332, "diversity jurisdiction" exists in federal court when two requirements are satisfied. First, the sum at issue must be greater than $75,000 in value. The second requirement is that every plaintiff and defendant must have distinct nationalities.
The Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 1332 is what, exactly?The legal representative of a baby or incompetent shall be deemed to be a citizen only of the same State as the infant or incompetent, and the legal representative of a deceased person's estate shall be deemed to be a citizen only of the same State as the decedent.
To Know more about trademark Visit:
https://brainly.com/question/28851180?
#SPJ1
the law has developed several rules which attempt to balance the interests of the minor and the other party. these rules are found in
Answer:
sales of good act
Explanation:
The law Standards for Privacy of Individually Identifiable Health Information are the set of guidelines that make an effort to balance the interests of the minor and the other party.
All people and institutions within a country, state, or community, including legislators and authorities, must abide by the same laws, according to the political premise of the rule of law. The "system, method, institution, practise, or norm that protects the equality of all citizens before the law, provides a nonarbitrary kind of government, and more generally precludes the arbitrary use of power," as defined by the Encyclopedia Britannica, is the rule of law. The concept of the "rule of law," which has close ties to both constitutionalism and Rechtsstaat, refers to a political reality rather than a specific legal principle. British usage of the expression dates back to the sixteenth century. Samuel Rutherford, a Scottish theologian, used it to challenge the idea of the divine right to reign in the century.
To know more about law please refer:
https://brainly.com/question/27557368
#SPJ4
why should documentation and record keeping requirements be integrated into policies and procedures?
Documentation and record keeping requirements should be integrated into policies and procedures for several reasons like compliance, accountability, improved processes.
Compliance: Documentation and record keeping are often required by law or industry regulations. Integrating these requirements into policies and procedures ensures that an organization is in compliance with these regulations.
Accountability: Documentation and record keeping provide a clear and detailed record of decisions, actions, and results. By integrating these requirements into policies and procedures, an organization can maintain accountability and ensure that its activities are transparent and verifiable.
Improved processes: Integrating documentation and record keeping requirements into policies and procedures helps to ensure that information is captured consistently and accurately, leading to improved processes and better decision-making.
Evidence of best practices: Documentation and record keeping can be used to demonstrate that an organization follows best practices, and can provide evidence of compliance with regulations and policies.
In summary, integrating documentation and record keeping requirements into policies and procedures helps organizations to maintain compliance, accountability, improve processes, and demonstrate best practices.
To know more about procedures please refer: https://brainly.com/question/14956758
#SPJ4
What was the most significant governmental action in the 1960s and 1970s to radically change the EMS
situation?
A) The EMS Services Development Act of 1973
B) President Johnson's 1965 President Commission on Highway Safety
C) The Highway Safety Act of 1966
D) Candidate Physical Ability Test (CPAT)
what is the failure to comply with the liquor licence and control act 2019?
The Liquor Act sets out three primary objectives. They are: to minimise alcohol abuse; that the sale and supply of alcohol meets the community's expectations; and that the balanced development of the industry is weighed against the need for controls and restrictions.
The ACT Government customer and regulatory service agency – is responsible for regulating the liquor industry. In the ACT, there is a licence and permit available for clubs depending upon the circumstances.Identify customers to whom sale or service must be refused according to state and territory legislation, including minors, those purchasing on behalf of minors, intoxicated persons, and persons affected by the consumption of illicit and other drugs.Anyone found violating any of the provisions may face the penalty of imprisonment of not less than one year but not more than six years without probation,” said PNP Chief Officer-in-Charge/Security Task Force Commander, Lt. Gen.They use the primary legislation—of which they are the one that controls alcohol sales and service—to enforce the liquor Act and licencing act. They were able to offer the guidelines or laws that each vendor and buyer must abide by; failure to do so can result in violations and subsequent penalties.
To learn more about Liquor Act, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/4833015
#SPJ4
.according to the functionalist theory, what happens when one institutions fails to do its part?
According to functionalism, institutions exist only because they play an important role in the functioning of society. An organization dies when it ceases to matter. As new needs arise or emerge, new institutions are created to meet them.
However, while some philosophers have concluded that functionalism is a superior theory of intentional states, it still fails because it fails to explain other types of mental states. Specifically, it says it cannot explain sensations and other conscious mental states.
The problem of using a functionalist perspective to study contemporary society. Related material has two uses. B. Functionalism cannot explain social phenomena scientifically. Functionalism fails to recognize and explain the conflicting nature of today's postmodern society.
For more information on social phenomena see:
https://brainly.com/question/4920304
#SPJ4
The separation of powers doctrine applies only to the federal government and not to state governments.
True
False
What is one change you wish tech companies would make to help accomplish this goal?
Answer:
I'll make a healthy work environment in the organization, as there is a workload on employees. I'll try not to put more pressure on them, by which they might make mistakes in their work. So to avoid these problems, I'll let them work freely.
HOPE IT HELPS YOU PLEASE MARK IT AS BRAINLIESTimagine that you were of a different nationality, what would change in you aside from your citizenship and origin?
If a person were of a different nationality, several things could change for them beyond just their citizenship and origin. Some of these changes could include: cultural identity, language, social networks etc.
1. Cultural Identity: A change in nationality could lead to a shift in cultural identity, as the individual may adopt the values, traditions, and beliefs of their new culture.
2. Language: A different nationality or citizenship often means speaking a different language, which could impact the individual's communication and ability to integrate into their new society.
3. Social and Professional Network: Moving to a new country can also mean leaving behind personal and professional networks, and building new connections.
4. Economic and Political Systems: A different nationality could mean exposure to different economic and political systems, which could have an impact on the individual's personal and professional life.
5. Perception and Treatment by Others: A change in nationality could also affect how the individual is perceived and treated by others, based on cultural and societal stereotypes and biases.
Overall, a change in nationality has the potential to bring both challenges and opportunities, and can have a profound impact on a person's personal and professional life.
To know more about citizenship please refer: https://brainly.com/question/18099945
#SPJ4
With respect to labor unions, employers used to halt early unionizing efforts
With respect to labor unions, employers used to halt early unionizing efforts by blacklisting and firing the employees that belonged to unions.
With respect to labor unions, employers used to halt early unionizing efforts by:By using various tactics such as firing union supporters, blacklisting, intimidation, and violence. Over time, laws were established to protect the rights of workers to organize and form unions, including the National Labor Relations Act of 1935.
Despite these protections, the relationship between labor unions and employers remains complex and sometimes contentious, with ongoing debates about the role and impact of unions in the modern workplace.
Read more on labor unions here: https://brainly.com/question/881501
#SPJ1
ap psych what are the major criticisms of the use of punishment?
The major criticisms of use of punishment are- Across all nations and cultures, corporal punishment is associated with a number of detrimental effects on children, including poor physical and mental health, delayed cognitive and socioemotional development, subpar academic performance, increased aggression, and the use of violence.
Any form of punishment has a very limited ability to change behaviour and shouldn't ever be the only tool used to control conduct. Three factors account for this: Working with mice or people, the undesirable behaviour always returns as soon as the punishment or prospect of punishment is removed.
Children who are physically punished may become more violent and antisocial as well as more prone to mental illness. Children who are physically punished learn that physical aggression is acceptable. It does not assist children in acquiring wholesome, useful coping mechanisms to deal with unpleasant feelings and circumstances.
To know more about Punishment, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/14228660
#SPJ4
foundational condition what is
Foundational condition is a part of the struc-ture that provides support to the ent-ire structure. It plays an imperative role in main-taining the stability of the structure on the gro-und.
The found-ation has to trans-mit load coming on the struc-ture direct-ly on to the ground. It pro-vides the segregation bet-ween the ground and the struct-ure. The conditions for lay-ing down the found-ation of the structure are as follows.
• The stre-ngth of the soil present on the ground must be en-ough to provide ample support to the structure with-out causing the structure to slip.
• The factor of compress-ibility of the soil should be high, because high-ly compressible soil will provide better st-ability to the structure.
To know more about foundation click below:
brainly.com/question/29566837
#SPJ4
Of the 50 U.S. states, the only one that it did not choose to essentially follow the English common law was . . . Louisiana
The statement that Louisiana was the only one that it did not choose to essentially follow the English common law is True.
Why does Louisiana not follow English Common Law ?Louisiana chose to adopt the Napoleonic Code as its legal system, which was based on the French civil law tradition. This decision was due to Louisiana's history as a French colony before it was sold to the United States in the Louisiana Purchase of 1803.
The state's unique legal system has distinct differences from the English common law system followed by the other 49 states, including the use of a civil law code and the presence of a civil law court system.
Find out more on English Common Law at https://brainly.com/question/7413269
#SPJ1
Options for this question include:
True FalseThe forensic part of forensic evidence refers to the scientific process through which facts are generated and the evidence part refers to a distinct set of procedures that are unique to the litigation process.
True/False
True: The forensic part of forensic evidence refers to the scientific process through which facts are generated and the evidence part refers to a distinct set of procedures that are unique to the litigation process.
Items or data gathered for use in court cases utilizing scientific techniques are referred to as forensic evidence. To aid investigators in solving crimes, a variety of forensic evidence can be collected. The first thing that detectives do when they arrive at a crime scene is secure the area to protect any tangible evidence.
Police can find the offender or offenders by conducting a thorough investigation of the evidence. Investigators will be seeking for samples of other bodily fluids, such as saliva or semen, that they can examine for DNA evidence in addition to blood evidence. Even though this forensic evidence might not be sufficient to convict an accused person on its own, it might help to link that person to the crime.
To know more about forensic evidence, refer to the following link:
https://brainly.com/question/28296347
#SPJ4
A right, privilege or interest limited to a specific purpose which one party has in the land of another. To use the land of another for ingress and egress for entry and exit of anothers property.
which side, students or administrators, is better supported by the existing case law? provide three facts that support your argument.
In the United States, the existing case law regarding the rights of students and administrators in educational institutions has generally supported the side of administrators, especially in regards to matters of discipline and maintaining order in schools. Here are three facts that support this argument:
The Supreme Court has upheld the authority of school administrators to maintain discipline and control in schools, even if this involves limiting the free speech rights of students.The court has also recognized the unique needs of schools to maintain order and safety and has given administrators broad discretion in making decisions related to discipline and student conduct.In many cases, the courts have deferred to the expertise and judgment of school administrators in matters of educational policy and discipline, and have limited the ability of students to challenge such decisions in court.It is important to note that this general trend in the case law can vary depending on the specific circumstances of each case and the laws of each state.
What can be called a survey in which anonymous respondents, without fear of disclosure or arrest, are asked to confidentially report any criminal law violations they have committed, or the victimization they have experienced ?
National Crime Victimization Survey is a survey in which anonymous respondents, without fear of disclosure or arrest, are asked to confidentially report any criminal law violations they have committed, or the victimization they have experienced.
In 1979, the NCS was transferred to the Bureau of Justice Statistics, where they began to evaluate the accuracy of the overview instrument and the information gathering procedure.
The NCVS's greatest success resides in its efforts to close the gap between reported and unreported misbehaviour, which is sometimes portrayed as the shadowy figure of wrongdoing.
The NCS was renamed the National Crime Victimization Survey in 1991 after a thorough updating process.
The NCVS compiles additional information on crimes committed and gives criminologists a more profound understanding of the types of crimes reported and characteristics of the suspects.
To know more about National Crime Victimization Survey, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/11179783
#SPJ4
What are the reasons Russia is failing in its invasion of Ukraine? I need a well detailed description for research.
Answer:
What are the reasons Russia is failing in its invasion of Ukraine? I need a well detailed description for research.
Russia's failure in its invasion of Ukraine can be attributed to a variety of factors. The most significant of these include the lack of international support for the invasion, the strong resistance of the Ukrainian military, the unexpected strength of Ukrainian nationalism, and the considerable cost of the invasion in terms of financial and human resources.
International support, or rather the lack thereof, has been a major factor in Russia's failure in Ukraine. Despite having the backing of countries like Belarus, Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan, Russia was unable to enlist the support of the international community, including the United States, the European Union and NATO. This lack of support meant that Russia was unable to secure any sort of international legitimacy for its invasion, a factor that was crucial to its success.
The Ukrainian military has proven to be a formidable opponent for the Russian forces, successfully managing to repel the initial invasion and then to launch counter-offensives that have considerably weakened the Russian forces. The Ukrainian military has been able to adapt to the changing tactics of the Russian forces, as well as to make use of the terrain and local knowledge to gain an advantage.
The strength of Ukrainian nationalism has also been a major factor in Russia's failure to succeed in its invasion. Throughout the conflict, the Ukrainian people have demonstrated strong support for the government and have resisted the Russian forces at every turn. This has made it difficult for the Russian forces to gain any sort of foothold in the country and has made it more difficult for them to achieve their objectives.
Finally, the considerable cost of the invasion in terms of both financial and human resources has been a major factor in Russia's failure. Despite pouring in billions of dollars and thousands of troops, the Russian forces have been unable to achieve their objectives. This has cost the Russian government and people dearly, both in terms of money and lives.
Explanation:
Скажи своей сексуальной милфе жопа учитель к горка в а ниггер дмс. я остаюсь получить эту сочную вагину учительницы ты чувствуй меня кууух???
why must a propertys legal description be in the sales contract
A legal description serves as official proof of the boundaries and enables a surveyor to precisely identify property lines in the future. This is very important and helpful in real estate deals and disputes. Usually, both the property deed and sales contracts will include the description.
A legal description is a written document that precisely identifies a specific piece of property. Depending on where the property is located in the US, this description can be written in a few different ways. However, when describing a same geographic location, the descriptions will frequently use the same terminology.
The county and state in which a piece of land is situated must always be mentioned in legal descriptions of real estate. Beyond that, the description must include sufficient details such that a qualified licenced surveyor might later revisit and precisely locate the property lines. Rectangular surveys, metes and bounds, and the lot and block systems are the most popular techniques used to produce legal descriptions.
To know more about sales contracts, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/29350867
#SPJ4
