Explanation:
The author should submit an evidence-based claim. Thus, the first step in the prewriting process for an argumentative essay is to develop an opinion.
when congress wants to regulate an issue, it most often passes very detailed regulations so that there are no questions about its intent.
True or False
The given statement " When congress wants to regulate an issue, it most often passes very detailed regulations so that there are no questions about its intent." is false in light of the fact that When congress needs to direct an issue, it most frequently passes extremely nitty gritty guidelines so there are no inquiries regarding its aim.
An administrative agency depicted about that framed by empowering regulation likewise gives the power to lay out guidelines that will authorize and execute the law.
Rule is another word that is utilized conversely with regulation. Regulations are otherwise called Demonstrations of Congress. The capability of the bureaucratic organization is to plays out an essential tasks in government that is execution, organization and guideline.
Learn more about congress regulation:
https://brainly.com/question/12921514
#SPJ4
Which amendment to the Constitution guarantees due process and equal protection rights to all citizens. A 1st Amendment B 5th Amendment C 14th Amendment
The 14th Amendment of the Constitution guarantees equal protection and due process to all citizens.
On June 8, 1866, the Senate passed the Fourteenth Amendment, granting citizenship to all people—including former slaves who were born or naturalised in the country—and extending the Bill of Rights' protections to the states. Also, it promised "equal protection under the law" for all residents.
The 14th Amendment made it illegal for former Confederate governments to make payments to former slave owners in order to settle their war debts and make up for the freeing of their slave populations. Lastly, it granted Congress the power to implement this amendment; This provision set the stage for the passage of other important pieces of 20th-century legislation, including the 1965 Rights Act and the 1964 Voting Rights Act.
To learn more about 14th Amendment, please refer:
https://brainly.com/question/29793577
#SPJ4
A consumer filed a products liability action against a manufacturer in federal district court based on diversity jurisdiction. Prior to trial, the manufacturer filed a motion in limine to exclude testimony by an expert on the consumer's witness list on the grounds that it was based on subjective belief and unsupported speculation. After holding a hearing, the judge granted the manufacturer's motion. Because of this ruling and the consumer's inability to produce other evidence in support of her case, the judge granted the manufacturer's subsequent motion for summary judgment. The consumer appealed the judgment, contending that the district court judge had erroneously excluded the testimony of the consumer's expert.
In reviewing this challenge to the trial court's ruling, what standard should the appellate court apply?
Abuse of discretion, because the judge had made an evidentiary ruling.
Absence of a genuine dispute and entitlement to judgment as a matter of law, because the ruling affected the summary judgment motion.
A preponderance of the evidence, because the ruling was outcome determinative.
Clearly erroneous, because the ruling was made by the judge.
According to the choices of alternatives provided above, it may be stated that the standard of abuse of discretion should be applied by the appellate court in the review of the challenge to the trial court's ruling being made. Therefore, the option A holds true.
The abuse of discretion may be taken into interpretation as the breach of law wherein an individual misuses the power of discretion in his or her hands, in order to use them for gaining personal benefits, or with the primary intentions of a guilty mind being portrayed by the user.
Learn more about abuse here:
https://brainly.com/question/19713181
#SPJ4
what cases fall under exclusive federal jurisdiction and therefore must be heard in a federal district court?
Cases related to Federal crimes, Bankruptcy, Patents, Copyrights, Trademarks, Securities and Banking, Suits between States, suits between foreign ambassadors and high-ranking public officials, falls under the exclusive federal jurisdiction.
In addition to the above-mentioned types of cases the federal courts also have the power or jurisdiction to those cases which arise from the act of congress such as environmental cases, labor and civil rights cases.
All the above-mentioned cases fall under the exclusive federal jurisdiction and therefore must be heard in a federal district court. The federal district court derives its powers from Article III of the US Constitution.
To know more about Trademarks, click here: brainly.com/question/19534317
#SPJ4
One safeguard against undetected _______ in an area of study is to have many different investigators or groups of investigators working in it.
One safeguard against undetected fraud in an area of study is to have many different investigators or groups of investigators working in it.
Fraud is the intentional deception or misrepresentation of one person to another, often for personal advantage. It entails the use of deceptive comments or acts to deceive others and cause them to act in a way that favours the perpetrator. Lying about one's identity or qualifications, fabricating documents, or misrepresenting the terms of a contract are all examples of fraud. Fraud is prohibited and, depending on the circumstances of the case, can result in civil or criminal sanctions.
For such more question on fraud:
https://brainly.com/question/28240105
#SPJ4
One way that the English Bill of Rights expanded on the Magna Carta was by stating that the monarch must have Parliament's consent to levy taxes. True/False?
The given statement "One way that the English Bill of Rights expanded on the Magna Carta was by stating that the monarch must have Parliament's consent to levy taxes." is True.
Because, it was added to limit the powers of the monarch in order to prevent the imposition of heavy and excessive taxes and fines by the monarch.
The concept of divine rights was challenged by magna carta because it gives rights to the common people which were solely held by the monarch. Later on, the concept of limiting the powers of the monarch was known as Constitutional monarchy.
To know more about magna carta, click here: brainly.com/question/572543
#SPJ4
he plaintiff sued the defendant in a contract dispute. at trial, the plaintiff's sister testifies as a witness on behalf of the plaintiff, stating that the defendant agreed to sell a computer to the plaintiff for $250. to prove that the sister is telling the truth, plaintiff's counsel asks the sister on direct examination about a conversation she had with her mother, in which she told her mother that the defendant agreed to sell a computer to the plaintiff for $250. the defendant objects to the testimony. how should the court rule?
The testimony cannot be used. A witness cannot support their testimony until after they have been impeached, according to a party. As a result, (D) is accurate.
The sister's prior statement, which is consistent with her evidence in court, is being used here by the plaintiff's attorney to show that she is being truthful. Due to the fact that the sister has not been impeached, the testimony is not admissible in this case.
(A) is untrue. A past, consistent statement may be used to disprove allegations that a witness is lying out of bias or to restore the credibility of a witness whose reliability has been questioned on unrelated, non-character grounds. Since the sister's credibility has not been questioned in this instance, there is no justification for enhancing it.
(B) is incorrect. Although the comment wouldn't be considered hearsay if it weren't being used to support the witness's credibility, it is nonetheless inadmissible because it was illegally supplied.
(C) is untrue. There is no evidence that the plaintiff's attorney used any deceptive tactics. Furthermore, a direct examination may occasionally allow leading questions (e.g., when the witness is hostile).
To learn more about defendant visit;
https://brainly.com/question/30499612
#SPJ4
antitrust laws have been implemented by governments to promote
The implementation of the antitrust laws has been made by the government in order to lead a promotion of competition in the markets.
The antitrust laws are the laws that are brought into enforcement in order to bring regulations of competitiveness among the sellers in the market during a given particular period of time in an economy. In fact, the entire construction of these laws has been built around the regulations related to the market competition, and provides protection against unfair advantages to the sellers.
Learn more about antitrust laws here:
https://brainly.com/question/29588193
#SPJ4
Complete question
antitrust laws have been implemented by governments to promote ______
A person has been using a portion of their neighbor's land for years as a parking space, but
the neighbor now wants to sell the property to a developer. What legal action can the
person take to secure their right to park on the land?
Homeowners have the legal right to keep intruders off their property. People can do this by erecting fences, posting signs, or simply asking trespassers to leave. This is also known as an easement.
What is easement?An easement is a nonpossessory right to use and/or enter another's real property without owning it. It is best exemplified by the right of way that one landowner, A, may have over the land of another, B. In most jurisdictions, an easement is a property right and type of incorporeal property in and of itself.
A landowner can call the police in cases of serious, repeated annoyance or threatened harm, and the police will usually warn the person to stay away and, if necessary, make an arrest.
Therefore, the person can charged of easement for using a portion of their neighbor's land for years as a parking space.
To learn more about easement, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/13059197
#SPJ9
in virginia, it is illegal to drive on the left side of the road for passing purposes when
Answer: The driver of a vehicle shall not drive to the left side of the center line of a highway in overtaking and passing another vehicle proceeding in the same direction unless the such left side is clearly visible and is free of oncoming traffic for a sufficient distance ahead to permit such overtaking and passing to be made safely.
Explanation: This Virginia law took effect on July 1, 2017. Under the law, when drivers remain in the left lane, they can face a fine of $100. The law is designed to facilitate traffic flow and prevent accidents.
In Virginia, it is illegal to drive on the left side of the road for passing purposes when there is a solid yellow line on your side of the road. I will show you others.
When is it illegal to drive on the left side of the road?When there is a solid yellow line on your side of the road.When there is a no passing signal.When there is oncoming traffic.When you are approaching the top of a hill or a curve where you cannot see oncoming traffic.It is important to always follow the rules of the road in Virginia in order to keep yourself and others safe while driving. Passing on the left side of the road when it is illegal to do so can result in:
A ticket.Points on your license. Potentially an accident.Remember to always check for solid yellow lines, no passing signs, oncoming traffic, and limited visibility before attempting to pass on the left side of the road.
Another question about Virginia in https://brainly.com/question/410489
#SPJ11
One of the biggest challenges to airline frequent flier mile programs is the backlog of unredeemed miles. True or False
Yes, it may be stated as appropriate to mention that maintaining the backlog of unredeemed miles is among the biggest challenges for the airline's frequent flier miles programs. Therefore, the statement given is true.
The challenges of an organization are always related to the regular courses of business operations that they are engaged in. The problems arise because of the inefficiency of the management systems, as well as the factors that are not under control of the organizations for the time being.
Learn more about challenges here:
https://brainly.com/question/6981358
#SPJ4
If you were being interrogated by police detectives, do you think it is appropriate for them to lie to you to get to the truthPlease be detailed in your response
Answer:
The police can legally lie to you to get during an interrogation and young people are especially vulnerable to their tactics. In my opinion, I don't think it's appropriate for them to lie to you because when people are brought in for questioning by the police, they're expected to tell the truth. Most people would assume that the police must also be truthful during interrogations, but the reality is that the police can lie to you during an interrogation. I just don't think it's fair.
Explanation:
In general, progressives differed from labor and farm advocates because the progressives were mostly middle class urban reformers. True/False?
The given statement "In general, progressives differed from labor and farm advocates because the progressives were mostly middle-class urban reformers" is true.
Progressives were a diverse group of reformers who were primarily middle-class urbanites. They sought to address the social and economic problems caused by rapid industrialization and urbanization during the late 19th and early 20th centuries.
Many progressives believed that the government could and should play a more active role in regulating the economy and society, and they advocated for a variety of reforms, such as workers' rights, women's suffrage, and government regulation of big business.
In contrast, labor advocates and farm advocates were generally focused on more specific issues affecting their respective groups. Labor advocates, for example, focused on improving working conditions and wages for industrial workers, while farm advocates sought to address the economic challenges faced by farmers.
While there was some overlap between these groups and the progressive movement, the progressives tended to take a broader view of the issues facing American society and were less narrowly focused on specific interest groups.
To know more about middle-class urban reformers here:
https://brainly.com/question/30708982
#SPJ4
what term is used to describe an employment practice that lacks discriminatory content but still leads to discrimination?
what governing system allows the central government to alter or abolish subgovernments?
Subgovernments may be changed or eliminated under a unitary system of government. In a unitary system, either the central government is the only unit of government or the sub-units are.
It's common to refer to a unitary government as a centralized one. One centralized organization controls all of the government's authority. Local units of governance are established by the national (central) government for convenience.
Either there is just one level of government under the unitary system, or the sub-units are subject to the central authority. Orders can be delivered to the provincial or local government from the federal government. The federal government, however, is unable to impose orders on the state governments.
Learn more about governments Visit: brainly.com/question/25192887
#SPJ4
Section 27 of the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996 is an essential
provision in the country’s social security system. This provision forms the basis for
various legislation and court litigation on social security law. Discuss how the rights
under this provision can be limited.
Which agreement must be signed between a Criminal Justice Agency and a Private contractor who accesses CJI is the
A private contractor who accesses CJI must sign a privacy policy with a criminal justice agency.
Criminal justice is the process of giving those who have been accused of crimes justice. The government and many institutions that make up the criminal justice system. The goals contains helping the victims emotionally, rehabilitating criminals, and stopping the fresh crimes.
The primary elements of the criminal justice system are the police, the prosecution and defence teams, the courts, and the prison system. Because it provides the conventional means of resolving disputes and prosecuting offenders for crimes against society, a good criminal justice system is crucial to the rule of law.
To learn more about Criminal Justice visit;
https://brainly.com/question/30089720
#SPJ4
What are the four layers of the federal court system?
District courts, the Supreme Court, magistrate courts, and appellate courts make up the federal court system's four levels.
Federal courts examine matters involving the validity of statutes, laws, and treaties signed by American diplomats and public officials, disputes between two or more states, admiralty law, sometimes known as maritime law, and bankruptcy proceedings.
Federal courts can only consider things that are specifically permitted by the US Constitution or federal legislation since they only have limited jurisdiction. A case must be brought in federal district court if it arises from federal law, the Constitution, or a treaty.
The federal court process is more streamlined and frequently moves more swiftly than state courts.
Electronic filing is cost-effective in all federal courts, but not all state courts.
To learn more about federal court system visit;
brainly.com/question/11893658
#SPJ4
Who was the designated survivor for the State of the Union?
Secretary of Transportation Pete Buttigieg was the selected survivor for the 2021 State of the Union address.
To guarantee the continuation of government in the event of a catastrophic occurrence, the designated survivor is a member of the president's cabinet who is not present during the State of the Union speech.
The president's cabinet member who is not a member of the president's political party is often chosen to be the designated survivor. The chosen survivor is brought to a secret location, where they stay until the conclusion of the address.
To learn more about catastrophic event link is here
brainly.com/question/30634248
#SPJ4
an attorney making an opening statement might typically include___.
Typically, an opening statement by an attorney will include a concise summary of the relevant facts and supporting documentation.
A brief explanation of the relevant law and a request for a verdict is typically included in an opening statement. The lawyer describes the requested verdict in the motion for the verdict as well as the supporting evidence. An effective opening statement acts as the trial's route map.
Each side's attorneys are given the opportunity to introduce themselves and the other parties engaged in the case during opening comments. In order to help the jury comprehend the evidence that will be given during the trial, attorneys typically summarise the key details of the case during the opening statement.
To learn more about opening statement visit;
https://brainly.com/question/10956209
#SPJ4
what should you do when you are going to enter a roadway from a private road
When you are going to enter aroadway from a private road, you should first come to a complete stop before the sidewalk or, if there is no sidewalk, before the roadway itself. You should then look both ways and yield the right-of-way to any pedestrians or vehicles that are already on the roadway. Once it is safe to do so, you can then proceed onto the roadway.
It is important to remember that vehicles on the roadway have the right-of-way and you should always yield to them when entering from a private road. This will help prevent accidents and ensure the safety of all road users.
In summary, when entering a roadway from a private road, you should stop, look both ways, and yield the right-of-way to any pedestrians or vehicles already on the roadway before proceeding.
Read more about aroadway here:https://brainly.com/question/28141330
#SPJ11
When entering a roadway from a private road, you should stop, yield to oncoming traffic, and merge smoothly into the traffic flow.
Explanation:When you are going to enter a roadway from a private road, there are a few important steps to follow:
Stop at the edge of the roadway and look both ways for oncoming traffic.Yield the right of way to vehicles already on the roadway.When it is safe, use your turn signal and merge smoothly into traffic.Remember to always be cautious, obey traffic laws, and yield to other vehicles to ensure a safe and smooth entry onto the roadway.
Learn more about Entering a roadway from a private road here:https://brainly.com/question/10561336
this amendment abolished slavery within the united states, or any place subject to their jurisdiction. what is that amendment ?
Slavery was abolished by the 13th amendment in the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction.
This Amendment was ratified by three-fourths of the number of states in the US on 6 December 1865 and passed by the Congress on 31 January 1865. It also prohibits the practice such as involuntary servitude and peonage which means that when a person is forced to work in order to clear his debts.
It was the first amendment to the US constitution at the time of reconstruction and passed in a period when civil war ended, and Abraham Lincoln was the President at that time.
To know more about Amendment, click here: brainly.com/question/687600
#SPJ4
A tenant properly filed a complaint under state law against his landlord in federal district court under diversity jurisdiction, alleging that the landlord's negligence in failing to repair the stairs in a common area of the apartment building resulted in the tenant falling and sustaining significant injuries. After the landlord served his answer, the tenant moved for summary judgment. In support of his motion, the tenant submitted affidavits from three other tenants in which each stated that she had told the landlord prior to the accident that the stairs needed to be fixed. In opposition to the motion, the landlord submitted an affidavit from the maintenance worker employed by the landlord, stating that the stairs were in good condition on the day of the tenant's accident.
How should the court rule on the motion for summary judgment?
In the situation portrayed above, it may be stated that the court will grant the motion in the interest of the plaintiff, i.e., the tenant.
A court has the power to grant a motion in the case before an actual trial is being held in the court of law as per the legal procedures. In the cases that involve complaints against their landlords, the tenants usually have an upper hand in getting the motion granted by the court in their favors more often than not. Thus, the court readily grants motion in such cases.
Learn more about motion here:
https://brainly.com/question/28432756
#SPJ4
M1 Analyse the
relationship between
ethics and the law in
terms of their relevance
to own professional
responsibilities as a
health or care
practitioner
Law and ethics in medicine both rest on the principles of self-determination, beneficence, and a concept of justice to be provided to all patients by both medical professionals and society.
Why do healthcare professionals in their line of work have a legal and ethical responsibility?Healthcare professionals have a legal and ethical responsibility to safeguard the individuals they look after. Patients suffer if these obligations are neglected. Healthcare practitioners could potentially face consequences for similar behaviours. Doing what is right for the patient is an example of ethical behaviour or obligation. Practitioners are obligated to abide by the codes of ethics for many healthcare professions.
Thus there is a close relationship between laws and ethics in healthcare workers to protect the patients and prevent the dismantling of the system.
Learn more about ethics, here:
https://brainly.com/question/11992384
#SPJ9
which amendments address the rights of the accused?
What feature of Judaism is different from the religions of ancient Greece and Rome?
One major feature of Judaism that is different from the religions of ancient Greece and Rome is its monotheistic belief in one God.
In contrast, the ancient Greek and Roman religions were polytheistic, meaning that they believed in many gods and goddesses.
Judaism also places a strong emphasis on ethical behavior and the importance of following God's laws, as outlined in the Torah and other sacred texts.
While the ancient Greeks and Romans had ethical systems and codes of conduct, they were not necessarily tied to religious beliefs or practices in the same way that Judaism emphasizes.
Additionally, Judaism has a strong emphasis on the importance of community and social justice, with traditions like the obligation to give to charity and the concept of Tikkun Olam (repairing the world).
To know more about Judaism here:
https://brainly.com/question/29543913
#SPJ4
The plaintiff, a State N citizen, properly invokes a State M federal court's diversity jurisdiction in a tort suit against the defendant, an airplane manufacturer based in State M. The plaintiff credibly alleges that he was severely injured when the defendant's airplane crashed as a result of an improperly installed engine part. During discovery, the plaintiff learns that an employee of the defendant who installed engine parts at the time the plane was manufactured was an alcoholic whose drinking may have impaired his work. The defendant fired the employee before the plane crash that injured the plaintiff. What discovery device may the plaintiff use to obtain more information from the former employee?
A
An oral deposition.
B
An interrogatory.
C
A physical examination.
D
A request for admission.
The discovery device that the plaintiff may use to obtain more information from the former employee is an "oral deposition."
An oral deposition is a discovery method in which one party (in this case, the plaintiff) questions the other party or a witness (in this case, the defendant's former employee) under oath, while a court reporter records the questions and replies. The plaintiff might utilise the oral deposition to interrogate the former employee about his alcohol consumption and whether it interfered with his work when he installed engine parts for the defendant. The plaintiff may also ask the former employee further questions about the situation.
Interrogatories are written questions sent from one side to the other, but a physical examination involves a physical examination of a person.
For such more question on plaintiff:
https://brainly.com/question/1463591
#SPJ4
What is the meaning of the Voting Rights Act?
Answer:ok
Explanation:
Tarek is single and has an adjusted gross income of $37,059. He claims one
exemption of $12,400. What is his tax due?
Use the table below to help you answer this question.
Tarek's tax due is given as $3200
How to solve for the tax dueTo determine Tarek's tax due, we need to calculate his taxable income, then use the tax tables or a tax calculator to find the amount of tax owed.
First, let's calculate his taxable income:
Adjusted Gross Income (AGI) $37,059
Less: Personal exemption ($12,400)
Taxable Income $24,659
Next, we can use the tax tables for the 2021 tax year to find the amount of tax owed. Based on the taxable income of $24,659 and the tax tables for the 2021 tax year, Tarek's tax due would be approximately $3,206.
Read more on taxes here:https://brainly.com/question/25783927
#SPJ1
Explain the rights and duties of an advocate with illustation
Answer:ok i guess
Explanation:
