The principle of utility is the idea that actions should be judged based on their ability to create happiness or pleasure and to reduce suffering or pain.
The principle of utility, also known as utilitarianism, was developed by philosopher Jeremy Bentham, who believed that the goal of all human actions should be to create the greatest amount of happiness for the greatest number of people.Bentham believed that human beings were governed by two main desires: the desire for pleasure and the desire to avoid pain. He believed that these two desires were the driving forces behind all human actions.
Therefore, he argued, actions should be judged based on their ability to promote pleasure and reduce pain.One example of how the principle of utility could be applied to a modern moral dilemma is the debate over the use of torture in interrogations. Some argue that torture can be justified if it helps to extract information that could save lives. However, others argue that torture is never justified because it causes immense pain and suffering and violates human dignity.
Utilitarianism would argue that the use of torture should be judged based on its ability to promote the greatest amount of happiness for the greatest number of people. In this case, the utilitarian would argue that the use of torture should only be allowed if it is likely to produce information that could save many lives.
If the use of torture is unlikely to produce such information, or if the pain and suffering it causes outweighs the benefits, then it should not be allowed.In conclusion, the principle of utility is the idea that actions should be judged based on their ability to create happiness or pleasure and to reduce suffering or pain. It is a useful tool for evaluating modern moral dilemmas, as it allows us to weigh the potential benefits and harms of different actions.
Learn more about principle of utility Visit : brainly.com/question/30397143
#SPJ11
explain the root causes of your conflict The Kashmir conflict case in detail. Please do not forget to elaborate on the theory’s main assumptions, arguments etc. and then explain how these apply to your case.
The Kashmir conflict is one of the most prolonged territorial disputes in the world. It has been ongoing since 1947 when India and Pakistan were granted independence from Britain.
The two countries claim the region of Kashmir, which is divided between them. The conflict is rooted in historical, political, and social factors, which have been fueled by nationalism, religion, and territorial ambitions. Below are the root causes of the Kashmir conflict case:The first root cause is historical.
The region of Kashmir has a rich and complex history. It has been ruled by various empires, including the Mughals, Afghans, and Sikhs, before being annexed by the British in 1846. When India gained independence in 1947, Kashmir was not given the option to choose which country it wanted to be part of. However, Kashmir was a unique case because it had a Muslim majority but was ruled by a Hindu Maharaja.
Theories that explain the Kashmir conflict case are:Realism TheoryAssumptions - States are the most important actors in international relations.Arguments - Realists argue that the Kashmir conflict is a result of India and Pakistan's ambitions. Both countries want to control the region for strategic reasons. Realism theory applies to the Kashmir conflict case because India and Pakistan are competing for power and resources in the region.
Both countries have nuclear capabilities, which make the conflict more dangerous.Liberalism Theory Assumptions - International cooperation and institutions are essential for peace and stability. States can work together to solve conflicts and promote common interests.Arguments - Liberals argue that the Kashmir conflict can be resolved through diplomacy and dialogue.
Therefore, Liberalism theory applies to the Kashmir conflict case because it offers a solution to the conflict through diplomacy and dialogue. International institutions can play a significant role in resolving the conflict by facilitating negotiations and promoting peace-building measures.
To know more about Kashmir conflict, visit:-
brainly.com/question/15008103
#SPJ11
Subject: Challange and change in society
Issue: Immigrants: help immigrants to become contributing members of society who feel reflected in the Canadian Identity.
Questions:
What is currently being done to address this issue and why?
Government
Educational
Programs
Community
Services
Legislation
Media
Activists and
Protesters
Other
The Canadian government is taking various steps to address the issue of helping immigrants become contributing members of society and feel reflected in the Canadian identity.
These steps include government programs that focus on language training, employment support, and cultural integration. Educational institutions provide resources and support for immigrant students, helping them succeed academically and socially. Community services offer settlement assistance, social programs, and cultural events to promote inclusion.
Legislation ensures equal rights and protections for immigrants. The media plays a role in raising awareness and promoting positive narratives about immigrants. Activists and protesters advocate for immigrant rights and challenge discriminatory policies. Overall, a multi-faceted approach involving government, education, community services, legislation, media, activists, and protesters is being implemented to address the issue.
You can learn more about Canadian identity at
https://brainly.com/question/30777939
#SPJ11
13. What can you find out about El Sistema, Venezuela and the achievements of Gustavo Dudamel with Simon Bolivar Youth Symphony of Venezuela ? Listen to and comment on any one of his clips. To get you started, here is an exciting example from the London Proms featuring a piece written by Arturo Marquez called Danzon no. 2. What are some basic facts about the danzon ?
El Sistema is a system of youth orchestras in Venezuela that have become internationally recognized for their high level of musicianship and social impact.
Gustavo Dudamel, who is a Venezuelan conductor and violinist, is the most famous alumnus of El Sistema. Under Dudamel's direction, the Simon Bolivar Youth Symphony of Venezuela has achieved great success, including performances at major international venues such as the Royal Albert Hall in London and the Walt Disney Concert Hall in Los Angeles.
El Sistema is an educational program in Venezuela that teaches children and young people how to play classical music. The program is based on the idea that learning music can have a positive impact on children's lives, helping to build self-esteem, discipline, and a sense of community.
The Simon Bolivar Youth Symphony of Venezuela is a youth orchestra that was created as part of the El Sistema program. The orchestra is made up of some of the most talented young musicians in Venezuela, and has gained a reputation for its high level of musicianship and energy under the direction of Gustavo Dudamel.
Gustavo Dudamel is a Venezuelan conductor and violinist who rose to fame as a result of his work with the Simon Bolivar Youth Symphony. Dudamel has since gone on to conduct major orchestras around the world, including the Los Angeles Philharmonic, the Vienna Philharmonic, and the Berlin Philharmonic.
In terms of the danzon, it is a popular dance style in Cuba and Mexico that is characterized by a slow, elegant rhythm. The music is typically played by a small orchestra that includes instruments such as the flute, trumpet, and bass. The danzon was first popularized in the early 20th century, and has since become a popular dance style throughout Latin America.
Learn more about The Simon Bolivar Youth Symphony of Venezuela: https://brainly.com/question/14054370
#SPJ11
Edwards, a 9-year-old boy, gets too scared whenever leaves his parents and goes to school. His mother must leave work as and when she is informed to reach his school to stop him from ongoing weeping. He will most likely be diagnosed with QUESTION 11 A neologism is the invention of new words that have no meaning and are common to those diagnosed with schizophrenia. True False QUESTION 12 27 1. The term "obsessive-compulsive" as it applies to individuals who suffer from obsessivo-compulsive personality disorder refers to the unpredictable emotional reactions they have All of these are true repetitive and specific thoughts that these individuals cannot get out of their minds. ritualistic behaviors these people engage in
All the given statements are true in their respective contexts.In the given scenario, Edwards is suffering from school phobia, which is commonly known as separation anxiety. It is a common psychological disorder that can be observed in individuals of all ages, particularly in children.
Separation anxiety disorder is an exaggerated or excessive fear of being separated from the people that they are attached to. The most common symptoms of separation anxiety disorder in children include panic, tantrums, clinginess, crying, nightmares, stomachaches, and headaches. If this anxiety interferes with normal functioning and disrupts the normal life of a child or adult, a professional diagnosis of Separation Anxiety Disorder (SAD) is given. In some cases, medication may be required to treat this disorder.
Question 11). False: A neologism is not an invention of new words that have no meaning and are common to those diagnosed with schizophrenia. A neologism is an entirely new word or a new use of an old word, which is not common or accepted in language. It is a coined term that does not exist in the language and has no traditional meaning, although it is created in the attempt to express a new idea, situation, or phenomenon. It is a linguistic phenomenon that is often seen in psychology, medicine, and technology.
Question 12). The term "obsessive-compulsive" as it applies to individuals who suffer from obsessive-compulsive personality disorder refers to the repetitive and specific thoughts that these individuals cannot get out of their minds. Obsessive-compulsive personality disorder (OCPD) is a type of personality disorder that is characterized by a preoccupation with orderliness, perfectionism, and control over oneself and others.
People with OCPD are often preoccupied with details, rules, and schedules, and they tend to be inflexible and perfectionistic in their behavior. They also tend to be excessively devoted to work and productivity, and they may neglect their social relationships and personal needs in order to maintain their high standards.
Thus, all the given statements are true in their respective contexts.
To know more about Schizophrenia visit-
brainly.com/question/23035586
#SPJ11
Patient KF, who had a memory span of one, showed intact paired-associate learning after a 24 hour delay between study and test. This fact is inconsistent with which assumption of the original multistore model of memory?
a. STM store and LTM store operate in a unitary fashion
b. Content of the STM store is maintained by means of rote rehearsal
c. STM store is limited in capacity
d. STM is a gateway to LTM
e. All of the options
The fact is inconsistent with the assumption of the original multistore model of a. STM store and LTM store operate in a unitary fashion.
How does this violate the assumption ?The original multistore model of memory proposed that short-term memory (STM) and long-term memory (LTM) are two separate stores. However, the fact that Patient KF showed intact paired-associate learning after a 24 hour delay suggests that STM and LTM are not two separate stores, but rather that they are interconnected.
The fact that Patient KF was able to transfer information from STM to LTM suggests that STM and LTM are not two separate stores, but rather that they are interconnected. This is inconsistent with the assumption of the original multistore model of memory that STM and LTM are two separate stores.
Find out more on the multistore model of memory at https://brainly.com/question/17265833
#SPJ4
This is a Multiple Choice Question. Select the ONE answer you think is correct.
The Battle of Hattin was "the greatest defeat in crusading history" because
the military orders immediately disintegrated, following Saladin's execution of their leaders.
the monarchy was destroyed, following the capture and execution of King Guy.
virtually the entire fighting strength of the kingdom was lost, in a single battle.
The statement "the Battle of Hattin was 'the greatest defeat in crusading history'" because virtually the entire fighting strength of the kingdom was lost in a single battle is accurate. So, option c is correct.
The Battle of Hattin, which took place on July 4, 1187, during the Crusades, was a significant and devastating defeat for the Crusader forces.
During the battle, the Crusader army, led by King Guy of Jerusalem, was decisively defeated by the forces of Saladin, the Sultan of Egypt and Syria. The Crusader forces, including knights, infantry, and crossbowmen, were heavily outnumbered and suffered from a lack of water in the arid region. Saladin's forces effectively surrounded the Crusaders, cutting off their access to water sources and subjecting them to constant harassment.
As the battle progressed, the Crusader army faced severe losses, and many soldiers were killed or captured. King Guy himself was captured, and several military leaders, including Raymond III of Tripoli and Gerard de Ridefort, Grand Master of the Knights Templar, were executed by Saladin after the battle.
The defeat at the Battle of Hattin had significant consequences for the Crusaders. It resulted in the loss of key territories, including Jerusalem, which fell to Saladin shortly after the battle. The defeat also weakened the military power and morale of the Crusader states, leading to the subsequent collapse of the Kingdom of Jerusalem and a decline in the overall strength of the Crusader movement in the Holy Land.
Therefore, the Battle of Hattin is often considered one of the most significant and devastating defeats in the history of the Crusades, as it resulted in the loss of a large portion of the Crusader forces and had far-reaching consequences for the Crusader presence in the region. So, option c is correct.
To learn more about the Battle of Hattin, here:
https://brainly.com/question/19989944
#SPJ11
Complete question:
The Battle of Hattin was "the greatest defeat in crusading history" because
the military orders immediately disintegrated, following Saladin's execution of their leaders.
the monarchy was destroyed, following the capture and execution of King Guy.
virtually the entire fighting strength of the kingdom was lost, in a single battle.
A factor related to the study of quality of life includes: O It can be used to compare therapies. O QOL study can assist to understand what to expect after a treatment. O It can be used to guide interventions. O They can be less expensive than other measures of functioning. O All of the above.
The following are the factor(s) related to the study of the quality of life: It can be used to compare therapies, QOL study can assist to understand what to expect after treatment, it can be used to guide interventions and all of the above. So, option a, b and c is correct.
Quality of life refers to an individual's overall enjoyment or pleasure in life. It's a broad notion that covers a variety of criteria, such as physical health, mental and emotional wellbeing, social satisfaction, and relationships, and may even extend to financial and professional development.
The term QOL is utilized to assess, track, and compare aspects of an individual's life over time or in comparison to others. Therefore, all of the given options are factors related to the study of quality of life as they provide an understanding of what to expect after treatment, can be used to compare therapies, guide interventions, and are less expensive than other measures of functioning. So, option a, b and c is correct.
To learn more about quality of life, here:
https://brainly.com/question/28227145
#SPJ11
Which term(s) would apply to the owner of the lemonade stand? A) producer only B) owner only C) producer and consumer D) owner and producer
The term that would apply to the owner of the lemonade stand is D) owner and producer.
The owner of the lemonade stand would be accurately described as both an owner and a producer. Let's explore the definitions of these terms and how they apply in this context:
1. Producer:
A producer is an individual or entity that creates or manufactures goods or services. In the case of a lemonade stand, the owner actively participates in the production process by making and selling the lemonade. They are responsible for preparing the lemonade, managing the ingredients, setting prices, and overseeing the overall operations of the stand.
2. Owner:
An owner refers to an individual or entity that possesses legal ownership or control over something. In this scenario, the owner of the lemonade stand has full control and authority over the business. They own the physical assets of the stand, such as the equipment, supplies, and the stand itself. The owner also makes decisions regarding the business's operation, profitability, and any associated risks.
Therefore, the correct term that applies to the owner of the lemonade stand is D) owner and producer. The owner assumes both the role of the individual responsible for the business's operations and decision-making (owner) and the role of actively producing and selling the lemonade (producer).
It's worth noting that in some cases, the owner of the lemonade stand may also be a consumer, as they may consume the lemonade themselves or provide it to their family and friends. However, the primary roles of the owner in this context are as an owner and a producer.
To learn more about risks click here: brainly.com/question/28197739
#SPJ11
Or would you favor more of a "wait and see" approach?
The STAR method stands for Situation, Task, Action, Result. Explanation of the STAR Method
The STAR Method is a structured and systematic approach that job candidates may use to describe their previous work experience. The goal is to provide an organized response that showcases the candidate's abilities, qualifications, and potential to succeed in the job they're applying for. When answering a question about your approach to a specific situation, the STAR method can be particularly useful. The STAR technique is as follows:
S - Situation: Explain the situation that you encountered
T - Task: Describe the specific task that you were required to accomplish
A - Action: Discuss the steps you took to accomplish the task
R - Result: Summarize the outcomes of your actions
The "wait and see" approach refers to an attitude in which one decides not to act or make a decision right away. Instead, the individual decides to wait and observe how the situation evolves. It's often used when someone isn't sure what to do and requires more information or time to make a decision. For example, if a business is considering launching a new product, they may choose to adopt a "wait and see" approach to assess how the market responds to a similar product before making a decision.
Learn more about STAR method: https://brainly.com/question/29109870
#SPJ11
Briefly define the 3 types of memory covered in class, and
discuss how information progresses through these types of memories,
starting with stimuli perception to long-term memory.
When a grade 4 learner receives the opportunity to be the spelling team captain for her group because of improvement on spelling test scores, it is an example of using a atos are O Artificial, intrinsic, secondary reinforcer O Artificial, extrinsic, primary reinforcer O Natural, intrinsic, primary reinforcer O Natural, extrinsic, secondary reinforcer
When a grade 4 learner receives the opportunity to be the spelling team captain for her group because of improvement on spelling test scores, it is an example of using an artificial, extrinsic, primary reinforcer.
A reinforcer is something that follows a behavior and enhances the likelihood of it being repeated in the future. A reinforcer can be anything that increases the possibility of repeating a specific behavior, whether natural or artificial. Reinforcers are divided into three groups: primary reinforcers, secondary reinforcers, and generalized reinforcers.
Primary Reinforcer- Primary reinforcers are natural and unlearned. It meets our basic needs and satisfies our primary drives. Examples of primary reinforcers include food, water, shelter, warmth, air, and sleep. They are sometimes referred to as unconditioned or natural reinforcers. When a teacher rewards a student with candy for finishing a test, the candy is not a primary reinforcer but a secondary one.
In the context of the question, it is clear that the behavior of the learner was reinforced by offering them the position of spelling team captain. This is an example of an artificial reinforcer. This reinforcer was also extrinsic since it was provided by an outside agent or source.
To learn more about reinforcer, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/5162646
#SPJ11
List these factors and explain why the absence of these would be a problem. Would the presence of them motivate you? What about satisfiers-what satisfiers do you think motivate you the most? Why? Hygiene factors of most concern to you Why would the absence of these factors be a problem? Would the presence of them motivate you? What satisfiers do you think motivate you the most? Why
Absence of hygiene factors causes dissatisfaction. Their presence doesn't motivate, but prevents dissatisfaction. Satisfiers motivate through achievement, recognition, and responsibility.
It seems like you are referring to Herzberg's Two-Factor Theory, which categorizes factors that influence job satisfaction and motivation in the workplace. According to this theory, there are hygiene factors and satisfiers (also known as motivators). Let's break it down:
Hygiene Factors:
1. Job Security: The absence of job security can create anxiety and uncertainty, negatively impacting job satisfaction and motivation. The presence of job security provides stability and peace of mind.
2. Salary and Benefits: Inadequate compensation or lack of desired benefits can lead to dissatisfaction. Fair and competitive salaries, along with comprehensive benefits, contribute to overall job satisfaction.
3. Working Conditions: Unfavorable working conditions, such as poor physical environment or lack of necessary resources, can demotivate employees. A comfortable and well-equipped work environment enhances satisfaction and productivity.
4. Interpersonal Relationships: Negative workplace relationships, conflicts, or lack of support can negatively affect job satisfaction. Positive and healthy interpersonal connections foster a supportive and motivating work environment.
5. Organizational Policies: Unfair or unclear policies can create frustration and dissatisfaction. Well-defined and equitable policies contribute to a positive work atmosphere.
Satisfiers (Motivators):
1. Achievement: Feeling a sense of accomplishment and growth in one's work motivates individuals. Challenging tasks, opportunities for personal development, and recognition drive job satisfaction.
2. Recognition: Acknowledgment and appreciation for one's contributions and achievements enhance motivation and job satisfaction.
3. Responsibility: Granting autonomy, decision-making authority, and meaningful responsibilities provide individuals with a sense of ownership and motivation in their work.
4. Advancement: Opportunities for career growth, promotion, and professional advancement act as motivators for many employees.
5. Work itself: Engaging and fulfilling tasks that align with individual interests and skills promote motivation and job satisfaction.
The absence of hygiene factors can create dissatisfaction and demotivation, whereas their presence does not necessarily lead to high motivation but prevents dissatisfaction. Satisfiers, on the other hand, directly contribute to motivation and job satisfaction when present.
As an AI language model, I don't possess personal motivations or job satisfaction. However, individuals are motivated by different factors based on their unique needs, values, and preferences. Some people may be primarily motivated by achievement and recognition, while others may prioritize autonomy and personal growth.
It's important to note that everyone's motivators can vary, and individuals should identify their own key factors to enhance job satisfaction and motivation in their specific context.
Learn more about hygiene factors
brainly.com/question/28895947
#SPJ11
Research indicates that infant tests of intellegence generally have _______ for preschool intelligence while preschool tests are moderately predictive of later intelligence,
a. low predictive validity b. high predictive validity c. no predictive validity d. moderate predictive validity Which of the following models emphasizes the importance of social interactions with adults and peers when assessing school readiness? a. Maturationist b. Cumulative-Skills c. Ecological Model d. Constructivist Model
Infant tests of intelligence generally have low predictive validity for preschool intelligence while preschool tests are moderately predictive of later intelligence.(A)
Research has shown that infant tests of intelligence generally have low predictive validity for preschool intelligence while preschool tests are moderately predictive of later intelligence. This indicates that the intelligence testing conducted on infants is not necessarily predictive of their intelligence in the future when they reach preschool. However, preschool tests are moderately predictive of future intelligence. Hence, option (a) low predictive validity is the correct answer for the first question. The model that emphasizes the importance of social interactions with adults and peers when assessing school readiness is the ecological model.
This model focuses on the interaction between the environment, individual, and the task to assess readiness for school. This model considers the role of interactions with adults and peers as important factors that affect the readiness of children for school.
To know more about Preschool Intelligence visit-
https://brainly.com/question/31062537
#SPJ11
Consider a client with PTSD is being treated by counseling, what are the issues and the current challenges of treating this problem using Humanistic theory
• Explain how this problem would benefit from the further development of each of these theories.(Humanistic theory, Positive Psychology)
• Explain how the problem would have been viewed in the beginnings of the theories and what you think future research and development would do for the treatment and understanding of the problem.
• Do you think Humanistic theory is better than Positive Psychology for understanding the problem.
• Explain some of the other differences or arguments for why these two theories would or would not benefit from each other in further advancement.
• Explain how the advancement of either of these theories or both of these theories would benefit the problem you have selected.
• Summarize whether you think that it would be beneficial for these theories to be advanced through research.
Humanistic theory faces challenges in treating PTSD, particularly in addressing the traumatic event and specific symptoms. It can still offer valuable insights and understanding for individuals with PTSD. Positive psychology also plays a role in fostering resilience and positivity. Advancements in research can enhance these theories and lead to more effective treatments for individuals with PTSD.
Humanistic theory is a contemporary approach to psychotherapy that emphasizes self-exploration, self-expression, and the search for meaning in life as a means of personal growth and self-improvement. However, when it comes to treating individuals with post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), there are challenges associated with using humanistic theory.
One significant challenge is the difficulty in addressing the traumatic event that caused the PTSD. Humanistic therapy typically focuses on the present rather than the past, which may limit its effectiveness in dealing with trauma. Additionally, humanistic therapy does not offer concrete solutions for specific PTSD symptoms like flashbacks or anxiety attacks.
Despite these challenges, humanistic theory can still provide benefits for individuals with PTSD. By encouraging clients to explore their thoughts and emotions, humanistic therapy helps them gain a deeper understanding of their symptoms and their impact on their lives. Positive psychology, which focuses on personal strengths and positive emotions, can also be beneficial in helping clients cope with the negative symptoms of PTSD.
It is challenging to determine whether humanistic theory or positive psychology is superior in addressing PTSD. Both theories have their strengths and weaknesses, and they can be beneficial in different ways. Humanistic theory allows for exploration of thoughts and emotions, while positive psychology promotes a positive mindset.
Advancing these theories through research would be beneficial for understanding and treating PTSD. Further research and development could lead to more effective treatments that address the causes and symptoms of PTSD. By advancing these theories, we can provide better support for individuals recovering from this debilitating disorder.
Learn more about Humanistic
https://brainly.com/question/33503599
#SPJ11
Employee Relations Studies:
Question:
Should conflict at work be considered as something that is inevitable within employing organisations?
What role do trade unions play and why has trade union membership fallen in the UK? Ensure your answer includes relevant theory and examples.
Conflicts at work are inevitable within employing organizations. Conflict can arise when employees have different ideas, opinions, and values. These differences may lead to tension between employees, leading to conflict. Hence, it is essential to manage conflicts in the workplace to maintain a healthy work environment.
Trade unions play a significant role in managing conflicts in the workplace. They are responsible for protecting and promoting the interests of their members in the workplace. Trade unions negotiate with the employer to secure better wages, working conditions, and other benefits for their members. They also provide support and representation to employees who have grievances or complaints against their employer. In the United Kingdom, trade union membership has fallen over the years due to various reasons. Firstly, there has been a decline in traditional industries like mining and manufacturing, which were heavily unionized. Secondly, there has been a shift towards service industries that are less unionized. Thirdly, there has been a change in the nature of employment, with more people working in part-time or temporary jobs, which are less likely to be unionized. Lastly, there has been a decline in union membership due to changes in the law that have made it more difficult for unions to organize and take industrial action. To sum up, conflict is inevitable in employing organizations. Trade unions play a crucial role in managing conflicts and protecting the interests of employees. However, trade union membership has declined in the UK due to changes in the nature of employment and changes in the law.
learn more about trade union: brainly.com/question/881501
#SPJ11
Just answer Question B, Thank you
(a) What is the moral teaching of the Honest Woodcutter? Will a Kantian agree that the honest woodcutter makes a morally right choice? Explain your answer in details. (300-400 words)
(b) How will an act-utilitarian interpret the moral teaching of the story and what will probably be his response to the analysis proposed in part (a)? (300-400 words)
The Honest Woodcutter is a short story that teaches a valuable moral lesson. The moral teaching of the Honest Woodcutter is that honesty is the best policy, and honesty always wins in the end.
(a) The Honest Woodcutter teaches the moral lesson that honesty is always the best policy. The story highlights the consequences of dishonesty and the rewards of being honest. The woodcutter's honesty and integrity ultimately lead to his success. The Kantian philosophy would agree that the woodcutter made a morally right choice. The Kantian philosophy argues that one's actions should be based on moral duty, rather than the consequences of their actions. The woodcutter's honesty was an expression of his moral duty and therefore morally right.
(b) An act utilitarian would interpret the moral teaching of the story as a demonstration of the consequences of being honest. An act utilitarian would argue that the woodcutter's honesty led to positive consequences, including his reward and the respect he earned from others. The act utilitarian would also argue that if the woodcutter's dishonesty had been discovered, it would have led to negative consequences for him and his family.
An act utilitarian's response to the Kantian analysis proposed in part (a) would be that the morality of an action should be based on its consequences, rather than moral duty. The act utilitarian would argue that the woodcutter's honesty was morally right because it led to positive consequences, including his reward and the respect he earned from others. In conclusion, while both Kantian and act-utilitarian philosophies agree that the woodcutter's honesty was morally right, they differ in their justification for why it was right.
To know more about honesty visit:
https://brainly.com/question/32378128
#SPJ11
Mothers are likely to promote positive adjustment to a new baby by an older sibling if they 1 pts shower the older child with attention and be sympathetic to brooding give the older child quality time and sharply punish brooding encourage the older child to learn about the baby's competencies and to help care for the baby consciously reduce their attention to the older child while urging him or her to act more mature
Mothers are likely to promote positive adjustment to a new baby by an older sibling if they encourage the older child to learn about the baby's competencies and to help care for the baby. This approach allows the older child to feel involved and valued in the caregiving process while fostering a sense of responsibility and nurturing behavior.
It is important for the mother to provide guidance and support to the older child during this transition. Encouraging the older child to learn about the baby's capabilities helps them develop a better understanding of the baby's needs and how they can contribute to their care. This can include teaching the older child how to hold the baby safely, helping with feeding or diaper changes under supervision, or involving them in gentle play or interaction.
Additionally, mothers should consciously reduce their attention to the older child while urging him or her to act more mature. This means finding a balance between providing quality time and attention to both the older child and the new baby. It is important to avoid neglecting the older child's needs and emotions while still encouraging them to adapt to their new role as an older sibling. By acknowledging and validating the older child's feelings and offering them opportunities for growth and responsibility, the mother can promote positive adjustment and foster a healthy sibling relationship.
Showering the older child with attention and being sympathetic to brooding may inadvertently reinforce negative behaviors or create a sense of entitlement, as it places excessive focus on the older child's needs without promoting their understanding of the baby's needs or their role as a responsible sibling.Sharply punishing brooding can create a negative and punitive environment, which is not conducive to promoting positive adjustment. Punishment may lead to resentment, jealousy, or feelings of inadequacy in the older child.
To know more about Mother visit-
brainly.com/question/30836175
#SPJ11
1. In Zimmer’s article, why does Radu Popa consider having multiple definitions of life "intolerable"?
2. What is operationalism in defining life?
3. Ludwig Wittgenstein "argued that everyday conversations are rife with concepts that are hard to define" such as games. Name two other concepts (that you can think of) which fall into this category to which Wittgenstein refers and explain why they are difficult to define.
4. Why does philosopher Carol Cleland argue that we need to stop looking to define life?
5. Based on the article by David Livingstone Smith, how is being human "more like being a weed than it is like being water"?
Radu Popa, who is a microbiologist and astrobiologist, finds having multiple definitions of life as intolerable because he says that it is difficult to classify an object as living or non-living and makes the concept of life more complex. Operationalism in defining life is a method in which the concept of life is defined by its practical operations.
1. Radu Popa, who is a microbiologist and astrobiologist, finds having multiple definitions of life as intolerable because he says that it is difficult to classify an object as living or non-living and makes the concept of life more complex. According to him, a single, unified definition of life is crucial for astrobiology. The complexity arises as astrobiology is primarily interested in discovering life beyond earth, and multiple definitions may lead to confusion.
2. Operationalism in defining life is a method in which the concept of life is defined by its practical operations. It implies that for a theory to be meaningful, it must be grounded in the observable phenomena and verified by experiments. Operational definitions for concepts are critical because they specify an objective means of measuring the object under consideration.
3. Ludwig Wittgenstein has argued that everyday conversations are rife with concepts that are hard to define, such as games. Two other concepts that fall into this category and are difficult to define are love and beauty. These terms are hard to define because they can be subjective and mean different things to different people, depending on their life experiences and culture.
4. Philosopher Carol Cleland argues that we need to stop looking to define life because the concept of life is too complex to be defined in a way that encompasses all its aspects. Life exhibits a wide range of features that cannot be captured by a single definition, and thus it would be best to approach it with a more open mind.
5. David Livingstone Smith's article proposes that being human is more like being a weed than being water. He says that humans are adaptable and have survived in a variety of environments, much like weeds. The analogy of water is used to denote rigidity, and humans are the opposite of that, thriving even in harsh and diverse conditions. They are known to adapt and develop in various contexts to sustain themselves, much like weeds do.
To know more about microbiologist visit :
https://brainly.com/question/30626860
#SPJ11
Correctional boot camps are considered the most unpopular
sentencing alternative. Why? What do you believe is a better
alternative?
It is important to approach criminal justice with a focus on rehabilitation, treatment, and addressing the underlying causes of criminal behavior to achieve long-term positive outcomes.
Correctional boot camps are often considered unpopular as a sentencing alternative due to several reasons:
Effectiveness: There is limited evidence to support the long-term effectiveness of correctional boot camps in reducing recidivism rates or promoting positive behavioral changes.
Some studies have found that the impact of boot camps on reducing criminal behavior is short-lived once participants return to their communities.
Harsh and Punitive Approach: Boot camps typically employ a military-style disciplinary approach, which can involve strict rules, physical exertion, and intense discipline.
This approach may not be suitable for all individuals and may be perceived as overly harsh or degrading by some.
Lack of Individualized Treatment: Boot camps typically follow a standardized program that may not adequately address the specific needs and underlying issues of each participant.
Personalized treatment and rehabilitation plans are often more effective in addressing the root causes of criminal behavior.
Limited Focus on Rehabilitation: Boot camps primarily focus on discipline, physical fitness, and military-style training, but they may lack sufficient emphasis on rehabilitation, therapy, and skill-building to help individuals reintegrate into society successfully.
A better alternative to correctional boot camps would be a comprehensive and individualized approach that prioritizes rehabilitation, treatment, and community reintegration.
Some alternatives that have shown promise in reducing recidivism rates include:
Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy (CBT): CBT programs aim to address the cognitive distortions and patterns of thinking that contribute to criminal behavior. By helping individuals develop pro-social attitudes and skills, CBT can promote long-term behavioral change.
Substance Abuse Treatment: Many individuals involved in the criminal justice system struggle with substance abuse issues. Providing access to evidence-based substance abuse treatment programs can address the underlying causes of criminal behavior and reduce the likelihood of reoffending.
Vocational Training and Education: Equipping individuals with job skills, education, and vocational training can significantly improve their chances of finding stable employment upon release, reducing the likelihood of recidivism.
Community-Based Programs: Diverting non-violent offenders to community-based programs such as probation, restorative justice initiatives, and community service can promote accountability, provide necessary support, and encourage reintegration into the community.
to learn more about criminal behavior.
https://brainly.com/question/32241057
#SPJ11
2 pt Question 38 Obedience is different from authority because it involves an authority figure. O True O False
The given statement: "Obedience is different from authority because it involves an authority figure" is False. Obedience refers to the willingness of an individual to follow the directives or orders given by someone who is of a higher authority or rank. A person's obedience is influenced by various factors, including their beliefs, upbringing, culture, and other social factors.
Authority refers to the power or right to control, command, or rule a particular group of people, such as an organization or a nation. Authority figures may include managers, supervisors, parents, government officials, police officers, or any other person who holds some level of power or control over others. Difference between Obedience and Authority The difference between obedience and authority is that obedience is an individual's willingness to follow the orders of an authority figure, while authority is the power or right to control, command, or rule a particular group of people. Obedience is different from authority because it involves an individual's actions, while authority is concerned with a person's position or role. Thus, the statement "Obedience is different from authority because it involves an authority figure" is false.
To know more about Obedience visit:
https://brainly.com/question/29031144
#SPJ11
Think of a time when you felt really lonely. What did you learn about yourself from this experience? Your paper should be approximately 1 1/2 to 2, typed pages, 12 point font, double spaced. This assignment should be submitted as a word or pdf file.
A time when I felt really lonely was when I moved away from my family and friends to pursue my university degree in a different city. Initially, I was excited to be on my own and embark on a new adventure, but as time passed, the feeling of loneliness crept in.
At first, it was difficult to adjust to the new environment and make new friends, and I spent a lot of time alone in my dorm room. However, as I started to explore the city and participate in extracurricular activities, I learned a lot about myself and gained new perspectives.
Through my loneliness, I learned that I am a resilient and adaptable person. I realized that I am capable of handling difficult situations and can adapt to new environments. It taught me that I am capable of being independent and self-reliant. I also learned that it is important to step outside of my comfort zone and try new things, even if it feels uncomfortable at first. By doing so, I was able to meet new people and gain new experiences that I otherwise would not have had. Furthermore, it taught me the importance of self-care and taking care of my mental health. When I felt lonely, I made sure to take time for myself and engage in activities that brought me joy, such as reading, exercising, and exploring the city. Overall, my experience with loneliness taught me a lot about myself and helped me grow as an individual.
Learn more about university degree: https://brainly.com/question/30400499
#SPJ11
Ch. 21 - Social Movements & Social Change
How does one go about making social change?.
Making social change is a complex process that involves various strategies and approaches. Here are some key steps and methods that individuals and groups can take to work towards social change:
Identify the Issue: The first step in making social change is to identify and understand the issue or problem that needs to be addressed. It could be related to inequality, discrimination, environmental degradation, human rights, or any other social concern.
Raise Awareness: Create awareness about the issue by sharing information, organizing educational campaigns, and utilizing various communication platforms. This helps in mobilizing support and engaging more people in the cause.
Build Alliances and Networks: Collaborate with like-minded individuals, organizations, and communities who share similar goals. Building alliances and networks strengthens the collective power and amplifies the impact of social change efforts.
Advocate for Policy Change: Engage in advocacy work to influence policymakers and decision-makers. This can involve lobbying, writing letters, organizing meetings, and participating in public hearings or consultations. The goal is to bring about policy reforms and changes that address the root causes of the issue.
Community Organizing: Mobilize and empower communities affected by the issue to actively participate in the change-making process. Community organizing involves fostering dialogue, organizing meetings, workshops, and empowering individuals to take action and become agents of change within their own communities.
Learn more about social change:
https://brainly.com/question/13391889
#SPJ11
Classical conditioning in drug overdoses occurs often when users are in unfamiliar places. When users are in familiar places, the context in which the drug is taken becomes a _____ that signals that the drug is coming so the body is able to prepare for the dose in order to lessen the effect of the drug.
When users are in familiar places, the context in which the drug is taken becomes a Classical conditioning that signals that the drug is coming so the body is able to prepare for the dose in order to lessen the effect of the drug.
Classical conditioning is a process of learning that involves associating a particular stimulus with a certain response. In drug overdoses, users who take drugs in unfamiliar places can be more likely to experience a stronger effect of the drug due to the absence of contextual cues to signal that the drug is coming.
Conversely, in familiar places, the context serves as a cue that signals the impending arrival of the drug. This enables the body to prepare accordingly and lessen the effect of the drug. Thus, classical conditioning plays an important role in drug overdoses, particularly in terms of the context in which drugs are taken.
To know more about Classical conditioning visit:
https://brainly.com/question/32820244
#SPJ4
2. Discuss whether the social effects of emotion contagion require face to face interaction. In your answer, you should define key concepts, draw upon empirical evidence and include critical appraisal to support your answer.
The social effects of emotion contagion do not necessarily require face-to-face interaction. Emotion contagion refers to the phenomenon where individuals' emotions are influenced by the emotions of others. While face-to-face interaction can enhance the intensity and immediacy of emotional contagion, various forms of mediated communication, such as online interactions and social media, can also facilitate the spread of emotions. Thus, face-to-face interaction is not a prerequisite for the social effects of emotion contagion.
In recent years, research has increasingly focused on the social effects of emotion contagion in online environments. Studies have shown that emotions expressed in online platforms can be contagious and influence the emotional states of others. For example, positive posts on social media can evoke positive emotions in readers, while negative posts can trigger negative emotions. This suggests that emotional contagion can occur even without direct face-to-face contact.
Moreover, online environments often provide opportunities for the rapid and widespread dissemination of emotions. Emotional content can be easily shared and amplified through digital platforms, reaching a large audience in a short span of time. This can lead to cascades of emotional responses, where the emotions of one individual spread to others, regardless of physical proximity.
However, it is important to acknowledge that the intensity and depth of emotional contagion may vary depending on the medium of communication. Nonverbal cues and physical proximity in face-to-face interactions can amplify emotional contagion by providing richer sensory information. Furthermore, the absence of nonverbal cues and context in online communication may limit the accuracy and nuances of emotional interpretation.
In conclusion, while face-to-face interaction can enhance the social effects of emotion contagion, it is not a prerequisite for its occurrence. Mediated forms of communication, such as online interactions and social media, have been shown to facilitate emotional contagion and influence individuals' emotional states. However, the nature and intensity of emotional contagion may differ depending on the medium of communication.
Learn more about social effects
brainly.com/question/28934126
#SPJ11
Abortion is one of the most difficult and controversial moral issues we will consider. Listen to both sides, even if it is difficult to do. Both sides have important moral insights, even if ultimately these insights are outweighed by the insights of the other side. The goal of this discussion is not to convince you to accept one position over the other, but to help you to understand both sides. As you consider this difficult issue, it is important to distinguish two questions:
Is abortion morally wrong?
Should abortion be illegal?
Choose one of the questions above and argue both sides with supporting evidence.
Abortion is one of the most controversial issues and moral dilemmas in the society. The discussion about the legalization of abortion started during the women's liberation movement in the 1960s. Since then, it has become a debatable topic and divided the world into two opinions. Abortion refers to the termination of pregnancy, and it is mostly done in the first trimester of the pregnancy. There are two sides of this issue, one is whether abortion is morally wrong, and the other is whether it should be illegal. The first question, "Is abortion morally wrong?" is the foundation of the entire discussion about abortion. Those who are pro-life consider abortion morally wrong because it violates the life and dignity of the fetus, which should be considered as a human being. They believe that life begins at conception, and it is not right to kill a baby that has started its life.
According to the pro-life side, abortion is equivalent to murder because it is the killing of an innocent human being that has the right to live. Moreover, there is an argument that says that a woman cannot choose to abort her fetus because she is not the one who created life. God created life, and no one can take it away.On the other hand, the pro-choice side argues that abortion is not morally wrong. They believe that women have the right to choose what they do with their bodies, and they should have the right to decide whether they want to have a baby or not. The pro-choice side argues that a woman has the right to her own body, and she should be able to choose what to do with it. In addition, the pro-choice side argues that some women cannot have children because of medical reasons, and they should have the option to terminate their pregnancy if they want to.
The second question, "Should abortion be illegal?" is the second part of the abortion debate. Those who are pro-life believe that abortion should be illegal because it is morally wrong. They believe that if abortion is legalized, it will lead to the death of more innocent babies. They also argue that there are other options available for women who are not ready to have a baby, such as adoption.On the other hand, the pro-choice side argues that abortion should be legal. They believe that if abortion is illegal, women will still try to terminate their pregnancy, but they will do it in an unsafe and unregulated way, which will lead to health problems or even death.
According to them, women should have the right to choose, and it is not up to the government to decide what they do with their bodies. In conclusion, abortion is a moral dilemma that is divided into two sides, pro-life and pro-choice. Both sides have their own arguments and beliefs that are backed up with strong evidence and reasoning. While it is difficult to choose one side over the other, it is important to listen to both sides and understand their opinions. Ultimately, the decision about whether abortion is morally wrong or should be illegal should be left to individuals, and it is up to them to decide what they believe is right.
Learn more about Abortion
https://brainly.com/question/30917522
#SPJ11
When considering the moral issue of abortion, it is important to distinguish between whether it is morally wrong and whether it should be illegal. Arguments for abortion being morally wrong involve the right to life and religious beliefs, while arguments for it being morally acceptable emphasize women's autonomy and considerations about the quality of life and health risks.
Explanation:When considering the moral issue of abortion, it is important to distinguish between whether abortion is morally wrong and whether it should be illegal.
Arguments for abortion being morally wrong:The right to life: Some argue that abortion is morally wrong because it violates the right to life of the unborn fetus.Religious beliefs: Many religious individuals believe that human life begins at conception and that aborting a fetus is morally equivalent to killing a human being.Consistency: Some argue that if we consider killing a born human being morally wrong, then it follows that killing an unborn fetus is also morally wrong.Arguments for abortion being morally acceptable:Women's autonomy: Proponents argue that a woman has the right to make decisions about her own body, including whether or not to continue a pregnancy.Quality of life: Some argue that it is morally acceptable to abort a fetus if it is likely to have a severely compromised quality of life, such as in cases of severe genetic abnormalities.Health risks: In cases where continuing a pregnancy poses significant health risks to the mother, proponents argue that abortion is morally acceptable to protect the woman's well-being.In conclusion, the moral question of abortion is complex and often elicits strong opinions. The arguments for abortion being morally wrong center around the right to life and religious beliefs, while the arguments for it being morally acceptable emphasize women's autonomy and considerations about the quality of life and health risks.
Learn more about the Morality of abortion here:https://brainly.com/question/33716042
#SPJ2
8.667 points A study has high "reliability" if the questions accurately measure what the researcher intended to measure. True False
A study has high "reliability" if the questions accurately measure what the researcher intended to measure. This statement is True. Reliability refers to the degree to which a measure is consistent and stable over time. Reliability, in the context of research, refers to the consistency of a research study or measuring test.
A reliable research study or measuring tool is one that is constant over time and across different research scenarios. A study or measure is deemed to be reliable if the findings from that research study are consistent, reliable, and repeatable. For example, if a measure of anxiety produces the same results for the same subject each time it is administered, it is considered a reliable measure.To assess the reliability of a study, researchers utilize different techniques and procedures. The test-retest technique, the split-half technique, and the parallel forms technique are among the most popular techniques for assessing research reliability. In addition, the inter-rater technique is used to test inter-observer reliability.The internal consistency of a test or research study is measured using the split-half approach. The test or study is divided into two halves, and the outcomes of the two halves are compared to assess the study's consistency. The parallel forms technique compares two different versions of the same test to see whether they produce comparable results.Lastly, it can be concluded that a study is considered reliable when the findings obtained from the study are consistent, stable, and reproducible. It is beneficial since a reliable study aids in replicating the findings, making them generalizable and applicable to the population being studied.For such more question on reliability
https://brainly.com/question/28343205
#SPJ8
What are some reasons why the democratic form of government is
often regarded as the best form of government?
The democratic form of government is widely regarded as the best due to its representation of the people, freedom, equality, responsiveness to the people, and the stability it provides.
The democratic form of government is often considered the best form of government. The following are some reasons why the democratic form of government is considered the best form of government: 1. Representation of the people: One of the most important reasons why democracy is considered the best form of government is because it provides a representation of the people.
In a democracy, people can choose their representatives who will work towards their betterment. 2. Freedom: Democracy provides freedom to the people. Citizens in a democracy are free to speak their minds and express their opinions without fear of punishment. They also have the freedom to worship according to their beliefs, as well as the freedom to assemble and petition the government for a redress of grievances.
3. Equality: Democracy promotes equality. Every citizen in a democracy has equal rights and opportunities. No one is above the law, and everyone has the right to due process and equal protection under the law. 4. Responsiveness to the people: Democracy is responsive to the people.
In a democracy, the government is accountable to the people. If the government does not meet the needs of the people, they can vote them out of office and replace them with representatives who will better serve their interests.
5. Stability: Democracy provides stability. Democracies tend to be more stable and less likely to experience violent conflict. This is because democracies provide peaceful means for resolving differences and disputes.
To learn more about government
https://brainly.com/question/1078669
#SPJ11
Conduct research on how Apple Inc. operates.
Research the company creating a powerpoint that is 8-10 slides on the informal institutions that impact this company’s international business.
Apple Inc. is a US-based multinational technology company that designs and produces consumer electronics, computer software, and online services. In terms of market value, it is one of the largest corporations in the world. Apple Inc. operates through a network of subsidiaries, retail stores, and manufacturing plants across the world. In this research paper, we will conduct research on how Apple Inc. operates.
Apple Inc. has an efficient organizational structure, which is hierarchical in nature. The organizational structure of the company is segmented into various divisions such as design, engineering, operations, marketing, and finance. Each division is led by a senior executive, and employees are given clear instructions and responsibilities.
The company's international business is also impacted by various informal institutions such as culture, ethics, and social norms.
The informal institutions that impact Apple Inc.'s international business are discussed below:
Culture: Culture plays a significant role in shaping business practices and decision-making. Apple Inc. has operations in several countries across the world, and it has to adapt its business practices to different cultures. For instance, the company has to consider cultural differences while designing its products.
The company has to consider the language, customs, and preferences of the local people while designing its products.
Ethics: Ethics is an important factor that impacts business practices. Apple Inc. has a code of conduct that outlines the company's ethical standards. The company is committed to conducting its business in an ethical and responsible manner. The company's suppliers are also required to comply with the ethical standards.
Social norms: Social norms refer to the unwritten rules that govern social behavior.
Social norms can vary across different countries and cultures. Apple Inc. has to take into account the social norms while conducting business in different countries. For instance, the company has to consider the social norms while marketing its products. The company has to be mindful of the sensitivities of the local people while conducting its marketing activities.
Apple Inc. is a multinational technology company that operates through a network of subsidiaries, retail stores, and manufacturing plants across the world. The company's organizational structure is hierarchical in nature, and it has several divisions such as design, engineering, operations, marketing, and finance.
The company's international business is impacted by various informal institutions such as culture, ethics, and social norms. To succeed in the international market, Apple Inc. has to consider the impact of these informal institutions while conducting its business activities.
Learn more about Apple Inc:
https://brainly.com/question/32666867
#SPJ11
Discuss the arguments pro and con for the Pauline authorship of
Colossians. Take a stand on the issue.
The arguments pro and con for the Pauline authorship of Colossians are given below.
What are the arguments?Arguments in favor of Pauline authorship of Colossians include:
Paul's name is stated in the introductory segment, indicating that he is the author of the book (Col 1:1-2).The author of Colossians identifies himself as Paul, who also identifies himself as the author of the other letters.The theological concepts and phraseology used in Colossians are consistent with Pauline thought and language.Paul's assistant, Timothy, is mentioned in Colossians as the co-author (Col 1:1).The letter was written at a time when Paul was in prison (Col 4:18), which is consistent with what we know of his life.Arguments against Pauline authorship of Colossians include:
The introduction of Colossians differs significantly from those of Paul's undisputed letters.There is a lack of personal data in Colossians, as well as the writer's mention of a hypothetical future visit.Colossians' structure and argument are distinct from Paul's undisputed letters.There are significant theological differences between Colossians and the undisputed Pauline letters.A controversial and difficult-to-determine problem is whether Colossians was written at the same time as the "prison letters" of Paul's letters to the Philippians, Ephesians, and Philemon.Pauline authorship of Colossians is widely recognized in current scholarship. Colossians is seen as a product of the Pauline community, as it reflects many of Paul's unique perspectives.The epistle's differences from the undisputed Pauline letters are seen as a result of the unique circumstances of Colossians's authorship. As a result, the Pauline authorship of Colossians is affirmed.
To know more on Authorship visit:
https://brainly.com/question/33018504
#SPJ11
In Aristotle's definition of tragedy, the philosopher maintains that good tragedy must have the element of amplitude. Which of the following details from Oedipus the King illustrates the role of amplitude in the play? O 1. Oedipus angers Teiresias by insisting that he reveal what he knows about the death of Laius. O 2. The Chorus sings the Odes in language enhanced by varying beauties. O 3. Oedipus decides to flee Corinth in order to escape his fate. O 4. Jocasta, in despair, hangs herself, leaving her children motherless.
In Aristotle's definition of tragedy, the philosopher maintains that good tragedy must have the element of amplitude. The detail from Oedipus the King illustrates the role of amplitude in the play is option 4. Jocasta, in despair, hangs herself, leaving her children motherless.
Oedipus the King is an example of the ideal Greek tragedy because it contains the element of amplitude. Aristotle asserted that tragedy should be able to produce feelings of awe in the audience. This can be done by portraying great personalities in a manner that emphasizes their importance. The situation presented in Oedipus the King highlights the importance of amplitude as an essential element of tragedy.
Jocasta, in despair, hangs herself, leaving her children motherless. It is an event that produces feelings of awe and amazement in the audience because of the significance of the individual involved, Jocasta. In conclusion, the role of amplitude in a tragedy refers to the presentation of great individuals in a manner that emphasizes their importance.
Learn more about Oedipus
https://brainly.com/question/9068011
#SPJ11