What is the smallest integer k such that √n = O(n^k)?

The  B-matrix for the transformation X-_Ax is:

[17b1 - 3b2 - 54b3]
[22b1 + b2 + b3]

The B-matrix for the transformation X-_Ax is a matrix that represents the images of each basis vector in B under the linear transformation represented by the matrix A. To find the B-matrix, we first need to compute the product A*B, where A is the transformation matrix and B is the basis matrix.

In this case, we are given B = {b1, b2, b3} and A = [[17, -3, -54], [22, b2, b3]]. We multiply A by the column vector [b1, b2, b3] to get the image of each basis vector under the transformation. The resulting matrix has two columns, where each column represents the image of one of the basis vectors.

The B-matrix is then constructed by arranging the images of the basis vectors as columns of a matrix. So the B-matrix for the transformation X-_Ax is:

[17b1 - 3b2 - 54b3]
[22b1 + b2 + b3]

This matrix can be used to find the coordinates of any vector in terms of the basis B after it has been transformed by the linear transformation represented by A.

Visit to know more about Matrix:-

brainly.com/question/94574

#SPJ11

Answer:

650

Step-by-step explanation:

calculate 8 [tex]\frac{1}{3}[/tex]% of 600 then add this value to 600 for increase

8 [tex]\frac{1}{3}[/tex] % × 600 ← convert mixed number to improper fraction

= [tex]\frac{25}{3}[/tex] % × 600

= [tex]\frac{\frac{25}{3} }{100}[/tex] × 600 ( % is out of 100 )

= [tex]\frac{25}{300}[/tex] × 600

= 25 × 2

= 50

then increase is 50

so 600 increased by 8 [tex]\frac{1}{3}[/tex] % = 600 + 50 = 650

B

H

E

C

Standard form must be between 1 and 9

A sampling plan is a vital component in conducting statistical process control smoothly, as it provides structure, reduces variability, identifies critical parameters, guides data analysis, and enhances decision-making.

1. Defining the sample size and frequency: A sampling plan establishes the number of items to be collected and the intervals at which they will be collected. This ensures a consistent and representative sample, making the statistical process more reliable and efficient.

2. Reducing variability: By specifying the method of sample selection, a sampling plan helps minimize the potential for biased or non-representative samples. This results in better control over the process and more accurate insights into the system's performance.

3. Identifying critical parameters: A sampling plan helps identify the key characteristics of a process that need to be monitored and controlled. This enables the focus on essential aspects of the process, ensuring optimal control and improvement efforts.

4. Guiding data analysis: A well-established sampling plan provides a structure for data collection, which can be used to perform statistical process control. It aids in data organization and interpretation, making it easier to detect trends, patterns, and potential issues.

5. Enhancing decision-making: With a sampling plan in place, statistical process control results become more trustworthy and actionable. This allows for better-informed decisions related to process adjustments and quality improvement initiatives.

In summary, a sampling plan is a vital component in conducting statistical process control smoothly, as it provides structure, reduces variability, identifies critical parameters, guides data analysis, and enhances decision-making.

Learn more about sampling plan here:

https://brainly.com/question/28354571

#SPJ11

the number is really "x", which oddly enough is the 100%, but we also know that 15% of that is 9, so

[tex]\begin{array}{ccll} Amount&\%\\ \cline{1-2} x & 100\\ 9& 15 \end{array} \implies \cfrac{x}{9}~~=~~\cfrac{100}{15} \\\\\\ \cfrac{x}{9} ~~=~~ \cfrac{20}{3}\implies 3x=180\implies x=\cfrac{180}{3}\implies x=60[/tex]

The Taylor series for the function f(x) = 1/x centered at a = 3 is given by:

1/(x-3) = -1/(3-x) = -1/3 - (x-3)/9 - (x-3)²/27 - (x-3)³/81 - ...

This is a Maclaurin series with the associated radius of convergence R = ∞, since the function is analytic everywhere except at x = 3.

To derive the Taylor series, we first find the derivatives of f(x) = 1/x:

f'(x) = -1/x², f''(x) = 2/x³, f'''(x) = -6/x⁴, f⁴(x) = 24/x⁵, ...

Evaluating these derivatives at x = 3 gives:

f(3) = 1/3, f'(3) = -1/9, f''(3) = 2/27, f'''(3) = -6/81, f⁴(3) = 24/243, ...

Using these values, we can write the Taylor series in sigma notation as:

1/(x-3) = Σ (-1)ⁿ (x-3)ⁿ / 3ⁿ⁺¹, n = 0 to ∞

This series converges for all x such that |x-3| < 3, which gives us the radius of convergence R = 3.

Learn more about Maclaurin series here: brainly.com/question/28332433

#SPJ11

The ramp will rise approximately 15.95 inches from the ground at its highest end. Rounded to the nearest hundredth of an inch, the height is 15.95 inches.

To find the height the ramp will rise from the ground at its highest end, we can use trigonometry. The tangent function relates the angle of elevation (28°) to the height of the ramp.

Let's denote the height of the ramp as h. We can set up the equation:

tan(28°) = h / 30

To find h, we can rearrange the equation:

h = tan(28°) × 30

Using a calculator, we can calculate the value of tan(28°) ≈ 0.5317. Plugging this value into the equation, we get:

h = 0.5317 × 30

h ≈ 15.95

Therefore, the ramp will rise approximately 15.95 inches from the ground at its highest end. Rounded to the nearest hundredth of an inch, the height is 15.95 inches.

for such more question on height

https://brainly.com/question/27987869

#SPJ11

We can see here that according to the partial W-2 form, the money that was paid in FICA taxes is: B. $1789.87.

Governments impose taxes as obligatory financial charges or levies on citizens, businesses, and other organizations to pay for public expenses and fund government operations.

FICA taxes are comprised of Social Security and Medicare taxes.

The Social Security tax rate is 6.2% and the Medicare tax rate is 1.45%. The total FICA tax rate is 7.65%.

The breakdown of the FICA taxes paid:

Social Security tax: $1430.20

Medicare tax: $359.67

Total FICA taxes: $1789.87

Learn more about taxes on https://brainly.com/question/27978084

#SPJ1

There would be no significant difference between the two groups.

If the null hypothesis is true and the drug works no better than the placebo, it implies that the mean of the drug group and the mean of the placebo group are not significantly different. This means that the expected value for the mean of the two groups would be the same. The null hypothesis is a statement that there is no significant difference between the two groups, and hence, the means of both groups would be equal. Therefore, if the null hypothesis were true and the drug worked no better than the placebo, then the expected value of the mean of the two groups would be equal, assuming all other assumptions of the test are met.

Learn more about hypothesis

brainly.com/question/29519577

#SPJ11

Answer:

Steve is correct

After the point pass 3 miles on the x - axis the yellow car is more expensive because the yellow line is above the blue line indicating it's price was more. Before the 3 Mile mark theblue line was above the yellow.

To determine whether the assumption of constant error variance is satisfied for a model with tut, independent variables x, and x₂, you would examine the residual plot where the residuals are plotted against predicted values y.

This plot is also known as the plot of residuals versus fitted values. In this plot, if the residuals are randomly scattered around the horizontal line of zero, then the assumption of constant error variance is satisfied. However, if there is a pattern in the residuals, such as a funnel shape or a curve, then the assumption of constant error variance may not be met. It is important to ensure that the assumption of constant error variance is met, as violation of this assumption can lead to biased and inefficient estimates of the model parameters. Additionally, it can affect the reliability of statistical inferences and lead to incorrect conclusions.
In summary, to determine whether the assumption of constant error variance is satisfied for a model with tut, independent variables x, and x₂, you would examine the residual plot where the residuals are plotted against predicted values y. It is important to check this assumption to ensure the validity of the model and the accuracy of the results.This plot allows you to assess the variance of the residuals and identify any patterns, which could indicate that the assumption of constant error variance may not be met. If the plot shows no discernible pattern and the spread of residuals appears to be uniform across the range of predicted values, the assumption of constant error variance is likely satisfied.

Learn more about independent variables here:

https://brainly.com/question/17034410

#SPJ11

(i) (CUD-E) specified using set builder notation:

(CUD-E) = {x ∈ R | (x > 0 ∧ x ≤ 10) ∨ (x > 9 ∧ x ≤ 15) ∧ x ∉ {1, 2, 3}}

(ii) (CE) specified using interval notation and set operations concisely:

(CE) = (0, 10] ∩ {1, 2, 3} = {1, 2, 3}

(iii) (CDF) specified using the most concise notation:

(CDF) = (C ∩ D) ∩ F

(b) Proof using the element argument method:

Given: A and B are sets such that P(A) ≤ P(B).

To prove: A ≤ B.

Proof:

1. Let x be an arbitrary element in A.

2. Since x is in A, by definition, x is a subset of A. Hence, x ⊆ A.

3. Since x ⊆ A and A ≤ B, by the definition of ≤, x ⊆ B.

4. Therefore, x is a subset of B. Hence, x ∈ P(B), where P(B) is the power set of B.

5. Since x ∈ P(B), by definition, x is a subset of B. Hence, x ⊆ B.

6. Since x is an arbitrary element in A and x ⊆ B, by definition, A ≤ B.

7. Therefore, if P(A) ≤ P(B), then A ≤ B.

In this proof, we used the fact that if x is an element of A, then x is a subset of A. Also, if x is a subset of A and A ≤ B, then x is a subset of B. These properties are based on the definitions of subsets and the order relation between sets.

Learn more about set builder notation here:

https://brainly.com/question/30712666

#SPJ11

We fail to reject the null hypothesis and conclude that there is not enough evidence to suggest that the death rate for the treatment group is different from the overall death rate of 23%.

The null hypothesis is a kind of hypothesis which explains the population parameter whose purpose is to test the validity of the given experimental data.

To determine if any conditions are met, we need to perform a hypothesis test.

Null Hypothesis (H₀): The death rate for the treatment group is the same as the overall death rate of 23%.

Alternative Hypothesis (Hₐ): The death rate for the treatment group is different from the overall death rate of 23%.

We can use a one-sample proportion z-test to test this hypothesis. The test statistic is calculated as:

z = (p - P) / √(P(1-P) / n)

where p is the sample proportion (15/84), P is the hypothesized proportion (0.23), and n is the sample size (84).

Using these values, we get:

z = (0.1786 - 0.23) / √(0.23 * 0.77 / 84) = -1.76

The corresponding p-value for this test statistic is 0.0788, which is greater than the standard significance level of 0.05. Therefore, we fail to reject the null hypothesis and conclude that there is not enough evidence to suggest that the death rate for the treatment group is different from the overall death rate of 23%.

Learn more about null hypothesis on:

https://brainly.com/question/30404845

#SPJ4

For each i = 1, 2, ..., k, the elements in the cycle (a1, a2, ..., ak) belong to the orbit of the corresponding element ai, that is, {a1, a2, ..., ak} ⊆ orbG(ai).

To show that {a1, a2, ..., ak} ⊆ orbG(ai) for i = 1, 2, ..., k, we need to demonstrate that each element in the cycle (a1, a2, ..., ak) belongs to the orbit of the corresponding element in the cycle.

Let's start by defining the orbit of an element a in a permutation group G. The orbit of a under G, denoted orbG(a), is the set of all elements that can be reached from a by applying elements of G.

Now, consider the cycle (a1, a2, ..., ak) and an arbitrary element ai from the cycle. We want to show that ai belongs to orbG(ai).

Since (a1, a2, ..., ak) is a cycle, we know that applying it repeatedly to ai will cycle through all the elements in the cycle:

ai → a(i+1 mod k) → a(i+2 mod k) → ... → ak → a1 → a2 → ... → a(i-1 mod k)

By the definition of a cycle, we can see that each element aj in the cycle (a1, a2, ..., ak) can be obtained from ai by applying elements of the cycle (a1, a2, ..., ak) within G.

Therefore, each element aj in the set {a1, a2, ..., ak} can be reached from ai by applying elements of G, which means that aj belongs to orbG(ai).

Thus, we have shown that {a1, a2, ..., ak} ⊆ orbG(ai) for i = 1, 2, ..., k.

In summary, for each i = 1, 2, ..., k, the elements in the cycle (a1, a2, ..., ak) belong to the orbit of the corresponding element ai, that is, {a1, a2, ..., ak} ⊆ orbG(ai).

Learn more about disjoint cycle here

https://brainly.com/question/30507242

#SPJ4

To prove the given properties of Jacobi symbols, we first use the definition of the Jacobi symbol to rewrite it in terms of Legendre symbols. Then, we use the properties of Legendre symbols to show that (a) if a is congruent to b modulo n, then (na) = (nb) and (b) if a and b are integers, then (na)(nb) = (nab).

If a ≡ b (mod n), then a = b + kn for some integer k.

Using the definition of the Jacobi symbol, we have:

(na) = (3a)(5a)(7a)...

(nb) = (3b)(5b)(7b)...

Let p be an odd prime dividing n. We can write n = p^r * m, where r is a positive integer and m is not divisible by p.

Using the properties of congruence, we have:

3a ≡ 3b (mod [tex]p^r[/tex])

5a ≡ 5b (mod [tex]p^r[/tex])

7a ≡ 7b (mod [tex]p^r[/tex])

...

Since a ≡ b (mod n), we can also say that a ≡ b (mod [tex]p^r[/tex]). Therefore, for each prime factor p, the corresponding terms in the Jacobi symbols (3a/[tex]p^r[/tex]), (5a/[tex]p^r[/tex]), (7a/[tex]p^r[/tex]),... and (3b/[tex]p^r[/tex]), (5b/[tex]p^r[/tex]), (7b/[tex]p^r[/tex]),... are equal.

For each prime factor p, we have

(3a/[tex]p^r[/tex]) = (3b/[tex]p^r[/tex])

(5a/[tex]p^r[/tex]) = (5b/[tex]p^r[/tex])

(7a/[tex]p^r[/tex]) = (7b/[tex]p^r[/tex])

...

Since this holds for all odd prime factors p, we can conclude that (na) = (nb).

Using the multiplicativity property of the Jacobi symbol, we have:

(na)(nb) = (3a)(5a)(7a)...(3b)(5b)(7b)...

Using the same logic as in part (a), we can see that each term in the product on the left side is equal to the corresponding term in the product on the right side for each prime factor p. Therefore, we can write

(na)(nb) = (3ab)(5ab)(7ab)...

Using the definition of the Jacobi symbol, we can simplify this to:

(na)(nb) = (nab)

Thus, we have shown that (na)(nb) = (nab).

To know more about properties of congruence:

https://brainly.com/question/8438296

#SPJ4

The overall gain or loss from Peter's moves is 12.

The correct option is C.

To find the overall gain or loss from Peter's moves, we need to consider the direction and magnitude of each move. A positive value represents a gain or moving forward, while a negative value represents a loss or moving backward.

In this case, Peter had a gain of 5 spaces, followed by a loss of 2 spaces, a gain of 12 spaces, a gain of 7 spaces, and finally a loss of 10 spaces. When we add up these individual gains and losses, we find that the total sum is 12.

This means that, overall, Peter gained a net total of 12 spaces from all his moves. It indicates that he moved forward more than he moved backward. The positive value suggests a net gain in terms of spaces on the game board.

Therefore, the answer C) 12 represents the overall gain or loss from Peter's moves.

To learn more about subtraction;

https://brainly.com/question/2346316

#SPJ1

[tex]\textit{area of a circle}\\\\ A=\pi r^2 ~~ \begin{cases} r=radius\\[-0.5em] \hrulefill\\ r=35 \end{cases}\implies A=\pi 35^2\implies A=\cfrac{22}{7}\cdot 35^2\implies A=3850[/tex]

Answer:

  D.  1.353

Step-by-step explanation:

You want the area under the curve y = 2^(2x-3) in the interval [0, 2].

The area is found by the integral ...

  [tex]\displaystyle \int_0^2{2^{2x-3}}\,dx=\dfrac{1}{8}\int_0^2{4^x}\,dx=\dfrac{1}{8\ln{(4)}}(4^2-4^0)=\dfrac{15}{8\ln{(4)}}\approx\boxed{1.353}[/tex]

<95141404393>

In this problem, we are asked to find two numbers whose difference is 48 and whose product is a minimum.

To approach this problem, we can use the fact that the product of two numbers is minimized when the numbers are closest to each other. Therefore, we can let x be the smaller of the two numbers, and then the larger number is x + 48.

The product of these two numbers is:

P = x(x + 48) = x^2 + 48x

To find the minimum value of P, we can take the derivative of P with respect to x and set it equal to zero:

dP/dx = 2x + 48 = 0

Solving for x, we get:

x = -24

Substituting this value of x into the expression for P, we get:

P = (-24)^2 + 48(-24) = 576 - 1152 = -576

Therefore, the two numbers whose difference is 48 and whose product is minimized are -24 and 24. Note that the smaller number, -24, is negative, but this makes sense since the problem did not specify that the numbers had to be positive.

To learn more about difference click here: brainly.com/question/1852309

#SPJ11

The quadratic function f(x) = x² + 10x + 37 from standard form to vertex form is f(x) = (x + 5)² + 12

From the question, we have the following parameters that can be used in our computation:

f(x) = x² + 10x + 37

The above quadratic function is its standard form

f(x) = ax² + bx + c

Start by calculating the axis of symmetry using

h = -b/2a

So, we have

h = -10/2

h = -5

Next, we have

f(-5) = (-5)² + 10(-5) + 37

k = 12

The vertex form is then represented as

f(x) = a(x - h)² + k

So, we have

f(x) = (x + 5)² + 12

Hence, the vertex form is f(x) = (x + 5)² + 12

Read more about quadratic function at

https://brainly.com/question/1214333

#SPJ1

The height of the trapezoidal welcome mat that Polly Ester can create with 1114 ft2 of material, with bases of 5 ft and 4 ft, is approximately 247.56 ft.

To find the height of the trapezoidal welcome mat, we can use the formula for the area of a trapezoid, which is:

[tex]$A = \frac{(b_1 + b_2)}{2} \cdot h$[/tex]

where A is the area, [tex]b_1[/tex] and [tex]b_2[/tex] are the lengths of the parallel bases, and h is the height.

We know that the bases of the welcome mat are 5 ft and 4 ft, so we can substitute these values into the formula:

1114 = (5 + 4) / 2 * h

Simplifying this equation, we get:

1114 = 4.5h

Dividing both sides by 4.5, we get:

h = 1114 / 4.5

h ≈ 247.56 ft

To learn more about trapezoidal

https://brainly.com/question/22227061

#SPJ4

The measure of ∠s is 22 degrees according to corresponding and straight line angle.

We will use the rrelation between angles to find the measure of each. We see that ∠158 degree and angle r are corresponding angles and hence they will be equal. Thus, it can be said that angle r = 158 degree.

Now, angle r and angle s is present on same line. It means the sum of these two angles will be 180 degree. Using the relation to find angle s.

158 + angle s = 180

Angle s = 180 - 158

Subtract the values

Angle s = 22 degrees

Hence, ∠s measures 22 degrees.

Learn more about corresponding angle-

https://brainly.com/question/28769265

#SPJ1

The 95% confidence interval for the difference in the proportions of white and minority students who support the principal lies between -0.056 and 0.391.  

First, we shall  use the formula for a confidence interval for the difference in proportions:

Let:

p1 = proportion of white students who support the principal

p2 = proportion of minority students who support the principal.

p1 = 45/56 = 0.8036

p2 = 21/33 = 0.6364

Let:

n1 =  number of white students surveyed  

n2 =  number of minority students surveyed.

n1 = 56

n2 = 33

The point estimate for the difference in proportions is:

p1 - p2 = 0.8036 - 0.6364 = 0.1672

The standard error for the difference in proportions is:

SE = [tex]\sqrt{ [p1(1-p1)/n1] + [p2(1-p2)/n2] }[/tex]

SE =[tex]\sqrt{ [(0.8036)(1-0.8036)/56] + [(0.6364)(1-0.6364)/33] }[/tex]

SE = 0.1121

So, the 95% confidence interval for the difference in proportions is:

(p1 - p2) ± (critical value) * (SE)

where the critical value is based on a t-distribution with (n1 + n2 - 2) degrees of freedom at the 0.025 level (two-tailed test).

Using a t-distribution table, with 87 degrees of freedom, the critical value is 1.987.

The 95% confidence interval for the difference in proportions is:

0.1672 ± 1.987 * 0.1121

0.1672 ± 0.223

(−0.056, 0.391)

Thus, we can be 95% confident that the true difference in the proportions of white and minority students who support the principal lies between -0.056 and 0.391.  

Learn more about confidence interval /brainly.com/question/20309162

#SPJ1

The equation for the tangent plane at point P_0(2,1,2) on the surface 2x^2 + 4y^2 + 3z^2 = 24 is 5x + 4y + 3z = 20. The equation for the normal line at the point P_0(2,1,2) is parametrically represented by x = 2 + 5t, y = 1 + 4t, z = 2 + 3t.

To find the equation for the tangent plane, we first take the partial derivatives of the given surface equation with respect to x, y, and z, and evaluate them at point P_0(2,1,2). Then, we use these values and the point to write the equation for the tangent plane in the form Ax + By + Cz = D.  To find the equation for the normal line, we use the gradient vector of the surface equation at point P_0(2,1,2), which is orthogonal to the tangent plane at that point. This gradient vector provides the direction of the normal line, and we can use the point-slope form to write the equation for the line in terms of the given point and the direction vector.

Learn more about tangent plane here: brainly.com/question/31984140

#SPJ11

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Let x - be the number of sweets in small packs

y - be the number of sweets in big packs

Therefore, we have:

4x + 3y = 175 (1)

5x + 2y = 154 (2)

Now, we find the difference between (1) & (2) is:

y-x = 21. Thus, y = 21+x

Now we substitute the value of y = 21+x to any of the two statements, we have 4x + 3(21+x) = 175 => 4x + 63 + 3x = 175.

Hence, 7x = 175 - 63 = 112 or simply, x=16.

Now, finding the value of y:

5(16) + 2y = 154

80 + 2y = 154

2y = 154-80

2y = 74

y = 37.

Therefore, there are 16 sweets in each small pack and 37 sweets in each big pack.

To perform the indicated operations for the expression y^2-9/4 * 8/y+3, we can follow the order of operations, which is PEMDAS (Parentheses, Exponents, Multiplication and Division, and Addition and Subtraction).

First, we need to simplify the expression inside the parentheses:

y^2 - 9/4 * (8/(y+3))

Next, we need to simplify the expression inside the parentheses since it is enclosed in parentheses:

y^2 - 9/4 * (8/(y+3)) = y^2 - 18/(y+3)

Finally, we can simplify the expression further by multiplying (multiplication takes precedence over addition and subtraction):

y^2 - 18/(y+3) = (y^3(y+3) - 18)/4(y+3)

Thus, y^2-9/4 * 8/y+3 simplifies to (y^3(y+3) - 18)/4(y+3).

Answer:

5 in.

Step-by-step explanation:

For a square:

perimeter = 4 × side

20 in. = 4 × side

side = 20 in. / 4

side = 5 in.

The laptop will be worth $594.48 in two years.

To find the value of the laptop in two years, we need to substitute the given values into the formula:

Value = P x (1 - r)ⁿ

In this case, the original value of the laptop is $700, and it depreciates at a rate of 0.08 per year (which is 8% expressed as a decimal). We want to find the value in two years, so t = 2.

Substituting the values into the formula:

Value = $700 x (1 - 0.08)²

Value = $700 x (0.92)²

Value ≈ $700 x 0.8464

Value ≈ $594.48

Therefore, the laptop will be worth $594.48 in two years.

Learn more about Future Value here:

https://brainly.com/question/30787954

#SPJ1

This statement is false. In a weighted, connected graph with edge weights not necessarily distinct, if one Minimum Spanning Tree (MST) has k edges of a certain weight w, it is not guaranteed that any other MST must also have exactly k edges of weight w.

1. In a weighted graph, each edge has a weight (or cost) associated with it.
2. A connected graph means there is a path between any pair of vertices.
3. An MST is a subgraph that connects all the vertices in the graph, without any cycles, and with the minimum possible total edge weight.

However, there can be multiple MSTs for a given graph, and their edge weights distribution might not be the same. This is because MSTs are primarily focused on minimizing the total weight, not necessarily preserving the number of edges with a specific weight. Different MSTs may use different sets of edges to achieve the minimum total weight, so they might not have the exact same count of edges with weight w.

Learn more about graph here:
https://brainly.com/question/31741535

#SPJ11

The original number of friends planning the party was 25.

Let's assume the total number of friends originally planning the party is 'x'.

Initially, each friend would contribute an equal amount to raise $200. So the initial contribution per friend would be $200/x.

When five friends decided not to attend, the number of friends remaining is (x - 5). Now, each friend has to contribute $2.00 more than before.

So, the new contribution per friend is $200/(x - 5) + $2.

According to the given information, the new contribution is $2.00 more than the initial contribution:

$200/(x - 5) + $2 = $200/x

To solve this equation, we can eliminate the dollar signs and simplify:

200/(x - 5) + 2 = 200/x

Multiplying both sides of the equation by x(x - 5) to eliminate the denominators:

200x + 2x(x - 5) = 200(x - 5)

200x + 2x^2 - 10x = 200x - 1000

Rearranging the equation and simplifying:

2x^2 - 10x - 1000 = 0

Dividing the equation by 2:

x^2 - 5x - 500 = 0

Using the quadratic formula, we can find the values of x:

x = (-b ± √(b^2 - 4ac)) / (2a)

For our equation, a = 1, b = -5, and c = -500.

x = (-(-5) ± √((-5)^2 - 4(1)(-500))) / (2(1))

x = (5 ± √(25 + 2000)) / 2

x = (5 ± √2025) / 2

x = (5 ± 45) / 2

Simplifying further:

x1 = (5 + 45) / 2 = 50 / 2 = 25

x2 = (5 - 45) / 2 = -40 / 2 = -20

Since the number of friends cannot be negative, we discard x2 = -20 as an extraneous solution.

Therefore, the original number of friends planning the party was 25.

for such more question on original number

https://brainly.com/question/23136904

#SPJ11