What is the solutioWhat is the solution set to log(x + 7) > log3x?

n set to log(x + 7) > log3x?

Answer:

1- red, green

2- blue, green

3- green, blue

Step-by-step explanation:

The underlined options should be your answers.

To make a prediction of the horizontal distance of a baseball hit at an angle of 35 degrees, we can use the equation of the curve of best fit given as y = -0.16x² + 15x - 45, where x is the angle in degrees and y is the horizontal distance in feet.

Substituting x = 35 in the above equation, we get:

y = -0.16(35)² + 15(35) - 45y = -196 + 525 - 45y = 284

Therefore, the best prediction of the horizontal distance of a baseball hit at an angle of 35 degrees is 284 feet, which corresponds to option O in the table.

It's important to note that this prediction is based on the data provided and the curve of best fit obtained from that data. The accuracy of the prediction depends on the quality and representativeness of the data used to obtain the curve of best fit.

There could be other factors that affect the horizontal distance of a baseball hit, such as wind speed, air resistance, and the force of the hit.

For such more questions on Horizontal distance:

https://brainly.com/question/24784992

#SPJ11

The maximum value of P is 20.68, which occurs when x = 1.67 and y = 1.07.

The optimal solution, we need to first graph the constraints and determine the feasible region.

The first constraint is 3x + 5y ≤ 12, which represents a line with a y-intercept of 2.4 and a slope of -3/5.

The second constraint is 6x + 2y ≤ 10, which represents a line with a y-intercept of 5 and a slope of -3.

Plotting these lines on a graph, we get:

The feasible region is the shaded region that satisfies both constraints and lies in the first quadrant.

Next, we need to evaluate the objective function at each corner point of the feasible region to find the maximum value of P.

The corner points are:

(0, 2.4)

(1.67, 1.07)

(1.43, 0)

(0, 0)

Evaluating P at each of these points, we get:

(0, 2.4):

P = 9.6

(1.67, 1.07):

P = 20.68

(1.43, 0):

P = 17.72

(0, 0):

P = 0

For similar questions on maximum

https://brainly.com/question/82347

#SPJ11

Rounding to one decimal place, the initial population p0 is approximately 4954 by using integration in given equation
dp/dt = kp

1. First, let's establish the proportionality relationship. If the population growth rate is proportional to the number of people present at time t, we can write the equation as:

dp/dt = kp, where dp/dt is the population growth rate, k is the constant of proportionality, and p is the population at time t.

2. We need to solve this differential equation to find the relationship between the population p and the time t. Separating variables and integrating, we get:

∫(1/p) dp = ∫k dt

=> ln(p) = kt + C, where C is the integration constant.

3. To find C, we'll use the information that the population doubles in 5 years:

ln(2p0) = k(5) + ln(p0)

=> ln(2) = 5k

=> k = ln(2)/5

4. Now we know that the population is 8,000 after 3 years. We can plug this information into the equation:

ln(8000) = (ln(2)/5)(3) + ln(p0)

5. Solving for p0:

ln(p0) = ln(8000) - (ln(2)/5)(3)

=> p0 = e^(ln(8000) - (ln(2)/5)(3))

=> p0 ≈ 4954.3

To know more about integration Visit:

https://brainly.com/question/30900582

#SPJ11

Yes, either one column or one row of A is a multiple of the other.

It is true that if A is a 2 × 2 matrix with a determinant of zero, then one column of A is a multiple of the other column.

To see this is true, we can use the fact that the determinant of a 2 × 2 matrix A with columns [a1, a2] and rows [r1; r2] is given by the formula:

det(A) = a1r2 - a2r1

If det(A) = 0, then we must have a1r2 = a2r1.

There are two cases to consider:

a1 = 0

If a1 = 0, then the first column of A is a multiple of the second column, and we are done.

a1 ≠ 0

If a1 ≠ 0, then we can divide both sides of a1r2 = a2r1 by a1 to get

r2 = (a2/a1) × r1.

This tells us that the second row of A is a multiple of the first row.

The rows and columns of A are related by transposition can also conclude that one row of A is a multiple of the other row.

For similar questions on Column

https://brainly.com/question/25740584

#SPJ11

The value of x based on the triangle is 7 cm.

From the given figure, we know that the two corresponding lines are parallel and so the two given triangles are congruent to each other.

Therefore, the corresponding sides of these triangles will also be proportional so we can write it as:

5 / 45 = 3 / 2x + 10

10x + 65 = 135

Collect the like terms

10x = 135 - 65.

10x = 70

Divide

x = 70 / 10

x = 7

Therefore, the value of x is 7 cm.

Learn more about triangles on

https://brainly.com/question/11874663

#SPJ1

The arithmetic mean of the real and imaginary parts of z is approximately 0.8227 + 0.2643i.

Find the value of w²⁰ and then raise it to the 10th power:

w² = (½ + 3/2i)² = ¼ + 3/2i + 9/4 = 5/2 + 3/2i

So, w²⁰ = (w²)¹⁰ = (5/2 + 3/2i)¹⁰

Now, let z equate w²⁰:

z³ = w²⁰

Substitute the expression for w²⁰:

z³ = (5/2 + 3/2i)¹⁰

Find z by taking the cube root from both sides:

z = (5/2 + 3/2i)¹⁰^(⅓)

Using 10^(⅓) = 2.1544 to calculate z:

z = (5/2 + 3/2i)^2.1544

z ≈ 1.6454 + 0.5287i

The arithmetic mean of the real and imaginary parts of z is:

(mean) = (1.6454 + 0.5287i)/2

(mean) ≈ 0.8227 + 0.2643i

Therefore, the arithmetic mean of the real and imaginary parts of z is approximately 0.8227 + 0.2643i.

learn more about arithmetic mean: https://brainly.com/question/1136789

#SPJ1

If the null hypothesis is rejected, and the proportion of customers willing to pay more is significantly different from 10%, this would support my hypothesis that customers are willing to pay more for eco-friendly packaging.

Let's say you work for a company that has been using a certain type of packaging material for their products. However, there have been concerns raised about the environmental impact of this material, and the company is considering switching to a more eco-friendly option. You believe that customers would be willing to pay more for products that are packaged with the eco-friendly material, but you need to test this hypothesis.

Variable: The variable that would be tested is whether customers are willing to pay more for products that are packaged with the eco-friendly material.

Guess of value: I would guess that customers would be willing to pay more for eco-friendly packaging, but I'm not sure how much more. Let's say my guess is that customers would be willing to pay 10% more for products packaged with the eco-friendly material.

Hypothesis test: To test this hypothesis, I would conduct a survey where I randomly select a sample of customers and ask them if they would be willing to pay more for products packaged with the eco-friendly material. I would then compare the proportion of customers who are willing to pay more to my guess of the value (10%).

Null hypothesis: The null hypothesis would be that the proportion of customers willing to pay more for eco-friendly packaging is not significantly different from 10%.

Alternative hypothesis: The alternative hypothesis would be that the proportion of customers willing to pay more for eco-friendly packaging is significantly different from 10%.

 If the null hypothesis is not rejected, this would suggest that customers are not willing to pay more for eco-friendly packaging, and the company may need to reconsider their decision to switch to the more expensive material.

To learn more about proportion visit:

brainly.com/question/30657439

#SPJ11

The current yield on this bond is 6.49%.

A bond's yearly interest payment, market price, and par value must be known in order to determine the bond's current yield.

In this question, we are given that the bond pays an annual interest of $60, has a par value of $1,000, and is selling at a $75.25 discount from par value.

So, the market price of the bond is the par value minus the discount, which is [tex]$ 1,000[/tex] - [tex]$75.25[/tex] [tex]= $924.75.[/tex]

To calculate the current yield, we use the formula:

Current Yield [tex]=[/tex] (Annual Interest Payment / Current Market Price) x 100%

With our current values substituted, we obtain:

Current Yield [tex]= ($60 / $924.75) × 100%[/tex]

Current Yield [tex]= 0.0649 × 100%[/tex]

Current Yield [tex]= 6.49%[/tex]%

Therefore, (B) 6.49% is the right response.

To know more current yield about

https://brainly.com/question/30573341

#SPJ4

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

To find the mean, we first add up all the values in the data set: 14 + 14 + 10 + 12 + 11 + 13 + 11 + 11 + 14 + 10 + 13 + 8 = 131. Then we divide that sum by the total number of values, which is 12: 131 ÷ 12 = 10.92. Therefore, the mean for Jimmy's data set of days that had a temperature above 400C is 10.92 days per month.

Should be correct

Answer:

1. To find the mean of the data set, we add up all the values and divide by the total number of values:

Mean = (14 + 14 + 10 + 12 + 11 + 13 + 11 + 11 + 14 + 10 + 13 + 8) / 12 = 12

2. To find the median of the data set, we need to order the values from lowest to highest and find the middle value. In this case, the middle value is the average of the two values in the middle:

8, 10, 10, 11, 11, 11, 12, 13, 13, 14, 14, 14

Median = (11 + 12) / 2 = 11.5

3. The mode is the value that appears most frequently in the data set. In this case, the mode is 14 as it appears three times.

4. If there are 5 more days per month with a temperature above 400C, then we can add 5 to each value in the data set:

19, 19, 15, 17, 16, 18, 16, 16, 19, 15, 18, 13

Mean = (19 + 19 + 15 + 17 + 16 + 18 + 16 + 16 + 19 + 15 + 18 + 13) / 12 = 16.33

5. If there are 2 more days per month with a temperature above 400C, then the mode will remain the same as there are no changes in the frequencies of the values in the data set.

6. If the number of days per month that had a temperature above 400C doubles each month, the data set will look like:

14, 28, 56, 112, 224, 448, 896, 1792, 3584, 7168, 14336, 28672

The median is the middle value, which is 224.

7. To find the value of x, we need to first find the mean of 26, 12, and x:

Mean = (26 + 12 + x) / 3

We know that this mean is equal to the mean of 9, 16, and x, which is (9 + 16 + x) / 3.

Therefore, we can equate the two means and solve for x:

(26 + 12 + x) / 3 = (9 + 16 + x) / 3

26 + 12 + x = 9 + 16 + x

29 + x = 25 + x

x = 25

8. We know that the mean of 55 and x is 67:

Mean = (55 + x) / 2 = 67

Multiplying both sides by 2, we get:

55 + x = 134

x = 79

9. Let's call the weight of the two boys who weigh the same "w". We know that the mean of the three boys' weights is 40 pounds:

Mean = (50 + w + w) / 3 = 40

Simplifying the equation, we get:

100 + w = 120

w = 10

Therefore, the weight of each of the boys is 50 pounds, 10 pounds, and 10 pounds.

10. The cat consumes 2 cups of milk per day, so in a week, it drinks:

2 cups/day x 7 days/week = 14 cups/week

11. There is no mode.

Step-by-step explanation:

The second number in terms of n is x = n - 8.

Let the second number be x.

The fact that the first number is eight more than the second number is clear.

n = x + 8.    ...(1)

It is given that the third number is five more than the first number

n + 5 = y     ...(2)

We want to solve for x in terms of n, so we can use the first equation to get x in terms of n:

From equation 1 and 2

n + 5 = y = (x + 8) + 5

n + 5 = x + 13

x = (n + 5) - 13

x = n - 8

Therefore, the second number in terms of n is x = n - 8.

Learn more about Arithmetic problems here

https://brainly.com/question/10171217

#SPJ4

We would expect to get 225 purple, smooth kernels, 75 yellow, smooth kernels, 75 purple, wrinkled kernels, and 25 yellow

If the parent plants are heterozygous for both recessive traits, we would expect a 9:3:3:1 ratio of phenotypes in their offspring. This means that out of 400 kernels, we would expect:

Purple, smooth: 9/16 x 400 = 225
Yellow, smooth: 3/16 x 400 = 75
Purple, wrinkled: 3/16 x 400 = 75
Yellow, wrinkled: 1/16 x 400 = 25

Therefore, we would expect to get 225 purple, smooth kernels, 75 yellow, smooth kernels, 75 purple, wrinkled kernels, and 25 yellow, wrinkled kernels in a sample of 400 kernels if the parent plants are heterozygous for both recessive traits.

Visit here to learn more about heterozygous brainly.com/question/30156782

#SPJ11

To find the fourth corner of the rectangular mural, we can use the fact that opposite sides of a rectangle are parallel and perpendicular. This means that if we draw a line between the first two points, we can find the direction of one side of the rectangle, and if we draw a line between the second and third points, we can find the direction of the adjacent side of the rectangle. The intersection of these two lines will give us the fourth corner of the rectangle.

First, let's find the direction of the side of the rectangle that connects the first two points:

Slope of line connecting (–1, –1) and (–1, 1) = (change in y) / (change in x) = (1 - (-1)) / (-1 - (-1)) = 2 / (-2) = -1

So the side of the rectangle that connects the first two points has a slope of -1. We also know that this line passes through the midpoint of the segment connecting these two points, which is ((-1 + (-1))/2, (-1 + 1)/2) = (-1, 0).

Using point-slope form, we can write the equation of this line as:

y - 0 = -1(x - (-1))

y = -x - 1

Next, let's find the direction of the side of the rectangle that connects the second and third points:

Slope of line connecting (–1, 1) and (4, 1) = (change in y) / (change in x) = (1 - 1) / (4 - (-1)) = 0 / 5 = 0

So the side of the rectangle that connects the second and third points has a slope of 0. We also know that this line passes through the midpoint of the segment connecting these two points, which is ((-1 + 4)/2, (1 + 1)/2) = (1.5, 1).

Using point-slope form, we can write the equation of this line as:

y - 1 = 0(x - 1.5)

y = 1

Now we have two equations for the sides of the rectangle:

y = -x - 1    (from the first two points)

y = 1         (from the second and third points)

To find the fourth corner of the rectangle, we need to find the point where these two lines intersect. We can do this by setting the two equations equal to each other:

-x - 1 = 1

-x = 2

x = -2

Now that we know that x = -2, we can substitute this value into either equation to find the corresponding value of y:

y = -(-2) - 1 = 1

Therefore, the fourth corner of the rectangular mural is located at (-2, 1) in the coordinate plane.

(a) The probability that the current component is Brand X is 1/2, since both brands are equally likely to fail at any given time and the replacement component is always from the opposite brand.

(b) The age of the current component has a uniform distribution on [0,1] if it is a Brand Y component (since it was just replaced) and on [0,2] if it is a Brand X component (since it has been in use for some time).

(c) The total lifetime of the current component has a mixture distribution, where the probability density function is given by:

    f(t) = (1/4) for 1 ≤ t ≤ 2

    f(t) = (1/6) for 2 ≤ t ≤ 3

(d) If the replacement component is chosen randomly with a probability 1/2 for each brand, then the probability that the current component is Brand X is still 1/2.

This is because if the current component is a Brand X component, it has been in use for a time between 0 and 2 (uniformly distributed) and then it will fail at a time between 1 and 2 (uniformly distributed), for a total lifetime between 1 and 2 (with probability 1/2) or between 2 and 3 (with probability 1/2).

If the current component is a Brand Y component, it has been in use for a time between 0 and 1 (uniformly distributed) and then it will fail at a time between 1 and 3 (uniformly distributed), for a total lifetime between 1 and 2 (with probability 1/3), between 2 and 3 (with probability 1/3), or between 3 and 4 (with probability 1/3).

However, the distribution of the age and total lifetime of the current component will be different. The age of the current component will have a mixture distribution, where the probability density function is given by:

f(t) = (1/4) for 1 ≤ t ≤ 2

f(t) = (1/6) for 2 ≤ t ≤ 3

f(t) = (1/12) for 3 ≤ t ≤ 4

This is because if the current component is a Brand X component, it has been in use for a time between 0 and 2 (uniformly distributed) and then it will fail at a time between 1 and 2 (uniformly distributed), for a total lifetime between 1 and 2 (with probability 1/2). If the current component is a Brand Y component, it has been in use for a time between 0 and 3 (uniformly distributed) and then it will fail at a time between 1 and 3 (uniformly distributed), for a total lifetime between 1 and 2 (with probability 1/6), between 2 and 3 (with probability 1/3), or between 3 and 4 (with probability 1/6). The total lifetime of the current component will also have a mixture distribution, where the probability density function is the same as in part (c).

Learn more about Probability

https://brainly.com/question/24756209

#SPJ4

We must have used at least 6 of one type of stamp.we get:

[tex]5n + 8m = 72[/tex]

The amount of postage you make must be even, we can use the fact that 5 cents and 8 cents are both even. Let's say we use n 5-cent stamps and m 8-cent stamps.

Since both types of stamps are even, the sum n5 + m8 will be even only if both n and m are even.

(b) Suppose we made an even amount of postage, say 2k cents. If we used an odd number of both types of stamps, then the total number of stamps we used would be odd. Let's say we used n 5-cent stamps and m 8-cent stamps.

(c) Suppose we made exactly 72 cents of postage, say using n 5-cent stamps and m 8-cent stamps. Then, we have:

[tex]n5 + m8 = 72[/tex]

we get:

[tex]5n5 + 5m8 = 360[/tex]

Rearranging, we get:

[tex]25n + 40m = 360[/tex]

we get:

[tex]5n + 8m = 72[/tex]

Now, we know that n and m are both non-negative integers, so the only possible values for m are[tex]0, 1, 2, 3, 4,[/tex] or[tex]5[/tex]. But if m is less than 6, then 5n + 8m is less than 40, which means we cannot make exactly 72 cents of postage. Therefore, we must have used at least [tex]6[/tex]of one type of stamp.

To know more about this least  visit:

https://brainly.com/question/30060162

#SPJ4

In a case whereby the middle of {1, 2, 3, 4, 5} is 3 and the middle of 1, 2, 3, 4} is 2 and 3 the true statements are;

A statement  can be considerd to be true ,in a case whereby if what it asserts is the case,  in the same dimension it can be considered to be  false if what it asserts is not the case.

Instance of this can be seen above whereby An odd number of data values will always have one middle value and An even number of data values will always have two middle numbers.

Learn more about true statements at:

https://brainly.com/question/31215049

#SPJ1

The probability of selecting a yellow or red Skittle from the bag is 2/5 or 40%.

To find the probability of selecting a yellow or red Skittle from the bag, we need to first find the total number of yellow and red Skittles, and then divide by the total number of Skittles in the bag.

The bag has a total of 4 + 2 + 6 + 3 + 5 = 20 Skittles.

The number of yellow and red Skittles is 2 + 6 = 8.

Therefore, the probability of selecting a yellow or red Skittle is:

8/20

To reduce the fraction, we can divide the numerator and denominator by their greatest common factor, which is 4:

8/20 ÷ 4/4 = 2/5

To learn more about probability click on,

https://brainly.com/question/23765146

#SPJ1

Based on the data provided, we can conduct a hypothesis test to determine if there is a difference in the median delivery times for the two services. We can use the Wilcoxon rank-sum test, also known as the Mann-Whitney U test, since the data is not normally distributed.

The null hypothesis is that there is no difference in the median delivery times between the two services, while the alternative hypothesis is that there is a difference. We can set the level of significance at 0.05.

Using the data provided, we can calculate the median delivery time for each service:

- Service 1: Median delivery time = 24.5 + 26.0 + 28.0 + 21.0 + 18.0 + 36.0 + 25.0 + 21.0 + 24.0 + 26.0 + 31.0 / 11 = 25.5 hours
- Service 2: Median delivery time = 28.0 + 25.5 + 32.0 + 20.0 + 19.5 + 28.0 + 29.0 + 22.0 + 23.5 + 29.5 + 30.0 / 11 = 27.0 hours

To conduct the Wilcoxon rank-sum test, we need to calculate the U statistic. We can use Table 1 in Appendix B to find the critical values for U.

The U statistic is calculated as follows:

- Rank all the observations together from lowest to highest, ignoring which service they belong to.
- Assign ranks to each observation, with the lowest observation receiving a rank of 1 and so on.
- Add up the ranks for each service separately.
- Calculate the U statistic using the following formula: U = n1n2 + n1(n1 + 1) / 2 - R1, where n1 is the sample size for Service 1, n2 is the sample size for Service 2, and R1 is the sum of the ranks for Service 1.

Using the data provided, we can calculate the U statistic as follows:

- Ranks for Service 1: 1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 11, 8, 2, 7, 9, 10
- R1 = 1 + 3 + 4 + 5 + 6 + 11 + 8 + 2 + 7 + 9 + 10 = 66
- U = n1n2 + n1(n1 + 1) / 2 - R1 = 11 x 11 + 11(11 + 1) / 2 - 66 = 35

Using Table 1 in Appendix B with a sample size of 11 for both services and a level of significance of 0.05, we find the critical value of U to be 19. Since our calculated U of 35 is greater than the critical value of 19, we can reject the null hypothesis and conclude that there is a significant difference in the median delivery times for the two services.

In conclusion, the data provided suggests that there is a difference in the median delivery times for the two services. The Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used to determine this, and the critical value of U was found to be 19. Since our calculated U was greater than 19, we can reject the null hypothesis and conclude that there is a significant difference in the median delivery times.

Learn more about sample size here:

brainly.com/question/25894237

#SPJ11

To calculate the cash Los Altos, Inc. paid for rent, we need to subtract the prepaid rent amounts from the rent expense.

So the calculation would be:

Cash paid for rent = Rent expense - Prepaid rent

Cash paid for rent = $80,000 - $110,000 - $318,000

Cash paid for rent = -$348,000

Based on these numbers, it seems that Los Altos, Inc. has overpaid for rent and has a negative cash flow related to rent expenses. However, it's also possible that there are other factors at play here that could explain this unusual result.

Now, let's calculate the cash paid for rent:

$80,000 (rent expense) + $10,000 (prepaid rent, January 1) - $18,000 (prepaid rent, December 31) = $72,000

Los Altos, Inc. paid $72,000 in cash for rent during the year.

Learn more about prepaid rent here: brainly.com/question/26268428

#SPJ11

The assumption for linear regression analysis that is violated when the dependent variable is binary is the linearity of observed and predicted values. Binary variables only take on two values (0 or 1), and thus cannot be plotted on a linear regression line. Therefore, linear regression analysis is not appropriate for binary variables. Logistic regression is a more appropriate analysis method for binary variables.

Hi! If the dependent variable is binary and linear regression analysis is used, then the assumption for linear regression analysis that is violated is the "normality of error." This is because binary variables, which take only two values (e.g., 0 and 1), do not follow a continuous normal distribution, and thus, the errors in prediction are not likely to be normally distributed. Linear regression is designed for continuous dependent variables, so it's not ideal for analyzing binary outcomes.

To know more about  linear regression analysis Visit:

https://brainly.com/question/29665935

#SPJ11

There are 12 nickels and 7 dimes in the cup.

An equation can be described mathematically as a statement that supports the equality of two expressions joined by the equals sign "=".

Let x be the number of nickels and y be the number of dimes in the cup.

We know that:

x + y = 19 (the total number of coins)

0.05x + 0.10y = 1.30 (the total value of coins in dollars)

We can use the first equation to express y in terms of x:

y = 19 - x

Substituting this into the second equation, we get:

0.05x + 0.10(19 - x) = 1.30

0.05x + 1.90 - 0.10x = 1.30

-0.05x = -0.60

x = 12

Therefore, there are 12 nickels and 7 dimes in the cup.

Learn more about equation on:

https://brainly.com/question/27893282

#SPJ4

The expected count of members living less than 25 miles from the waterfall who rated the cultural importance as high is 60.

To determine the expected count of members living less than 25 miles from the waterfall who rated the cultural importance as high, we need to use the information provided in the table.

Here we need to find the total number of respondents in each group For those living less than 25 miles from the waterfall,

The total is 150.

For those living more than 25 miles from the waterfall,

the total is 100.

Again,we need to find the proportion of respondents in each group who rated the cultural importance as high.

For those living less than 25 miles from the waterfall,

the proportion is 60/150 = 0.4.

For those living more than 25 miles from the waterfall,

the proportion is 40/100 = 0.4.

Now, we can find the expected count of members living less than 25 miles from the waterfall who rated the cultural importance as high by multiplying the total number of respondents in that group (150) by the proportion who rated the cultural importance as high (0.4). Expected count = 150 x 0.4 = 60

Therefore, the expected count of members living less than 25 miles from the waterfall who rated the cultural importance as high is 60.

Learn more about expected value here,

https://brainly.com/question/24305645

#SPJ4

The value of n is 2.5.

What is the perimeter?

The perimeter is a mathematical term that refers to the total distance around the outside of a two-dimensional shape. It is the length of the boundary or the sum of the lengths of all the sides of a closed figure.

Here we have

The length of the sides of the triangle are n, (2n+1), and (5n - 6)

Since the perimeter of the triangle is 15 centimeters, we have:

=> n + 2n + 1 + 5n - 6 = 15

=> 8n - 5 = 15

=> 8n = 20

=> n = 20/8

=> n = 2.5

Therefore, the value of n is 2.5.

To learn more about the perimeter visit:

brainly.com/question/397857

#SPJ4

Complete Question attached below

To form a triangle, the set of line segments must satisfy the triangle inequality theorem, which states that the sum of the lengths of any two sides of a triangle must be greater than the length of the third side. Therefore, we need to check if the given line segments 8 cm, 4 cm, and 3 cm meet this requirement.

We can start by checking if the sum of the two smaller sides (3 cm and 4 cm) is greater than the largest side (8 cm). 3 cm + 4 cm = 7 cm, which is less than 8 cm. Therefore, these three line segments cannot form a triangle.

In general, for a set of line segments to form a triangle, the largest side must be smaller than the sum of the other two sides. In this case, the line segment of 8 cm is too long compared to the other two sides, which makes it impossible to form a triangle.

In conclusion, there are no line segments that meet the requirements to form a triangle with lengths of 8 cm, 4 cm, and 3 cm.

learn more about the inequality theorem here: brainly.com/question/1163433

#SPJ11

The answer is (C) 5/2 i.e. the time t guaranteed by the Mean Value Theorem is 5/2.

What is Mean Value Theorem ?

The Mean Value Theorem (MVT) for derivatives states that for a function f(x) that is continuous on the closed interval [a, b] and differentiable on the open interval (a, b), there exists a number c in (a, b) such that:

f'(c) = [tex]\frac{f(b) - f(a)}{(b - a)}[/tex]

In this problem, we want to find the time t guaranteed by the MVT when the instantaneous velocity of the rock equals the average velocity between t=0 and t=5/4 seconds.

The instantaneous velocity of the rock at time t is given by the derivative of s(t):

s'(t) = -32t

The average velocity between t=0 and t=5/4 seconds is given by the slope of the line connecting the points (0, s(0)) and (5/4, s(5/4)):

Savg(t) = [tex]\frac{s(5/4) - s(0)}{5/4 - 0}[/tex] =[tex]\frac{100 - 16*(5/4)^2}{5}[/tex]

We want to find the time t guaranteed by the MVT when s'(t) equals Savg(t), i.e., when:

[tex]-32t = \frac{100 - 16*(5/4)^2}{5}[/tex]

Solving for t gives:

t = 5/2

Therefore, the answer is (C) 5/2.

To learn more about Mean Value Theorem, visit the link:

https://brainly.com/question/30403137

#SPJ4

(L3) If angles are marked congruent and segments of equal measure extend from the point of intersection to the sides of a triangle, you are dealing with a(n)  incenter .

When the angles are marked congruent and segments of equal measure extend from the point of intersection to the sides of a triangle, this indicates that you are dealing with an incenter. The incenter is the point where the angle bisectors of a triangle intersect, and it is equidistant from the three sides of the triangle. The incenter is important in geometry because it is the center of the circle that can be inscribed in the triangle, called the incenter circle. The incenter and the incenter circle have many useful properties and are frequently used in geometric proofs and constructions.

Learn more about congruent

https://brainly.com/question/12413243

#SPJ4

Answer:

  r√2

Step-by-step explanation:

You want to know the distance from the center of a marble of radius r to the corner of an L-shaped track in which it rolls.

The center of the marble can only come within r of the track edges, so the distance to the corner will be the hypotenuse of a right triangle with legs r. That distance is r√2.

The center of the marble is r√2 from the corner of the track.

__

Additional comment

You can see in the second attachment that the distance to the corner of the track will depend on where the marble is rolling in the track. It might only be r away from the corner.

<95141404393>

Answer:

Part A:

From the box plots, we can see that the Red Team has the least variability and spread of times, followed by the Blue Team and then the Green Team. The Red Team's box is the smallest, indicating that their times are more tightly clustered together.

Part B:

Blue Team:

Q1: 75

Q2: 82

Q3: 87

IQR: 12

Upper fence: Q3 + 1.5IQR = 87 + 1.512 = 105

There are no outliers

Green Team:

Q1: 70

Q2: 75

Q3: 80

IQR: 10

Upper fence: Q3 + 1.5IQR = 80 + 1.510 = 95

There is one outlier at 90

Red Team:

Q1: 80

Q2: 83

Q3: 87

IQR: 7

Upper fence: Q3 + 1.5IQR = 87 + 1.57 = 98.5

There are no outliers

Step-by-step explanation:

N/A

1. Pick a random starting point in the table and read four digits.

This is the step in selecting a random sample by this procedure

What is sample?

In statistics, a sample refers to a group of individuals, objects, or events that are selected from a larger population to represent that population. Sampling is the process of selecting a subset of individuals or items from a larger population in order to infer something about the whole population.

The step in selecting a random sample by the procedure described in the scenario is step 1: Pick a random starting point in the table and read four digits. This step ensures that the selection of horses is entirely random, with each horse having an equal chance of being chosen. By starting at a random point in the table and selecting the first four digits, the veterinarians are eliminating any possible bias in the selection process. The subsequent steps involve using the selected four digits to determine if they correspond to a horse ID, discarding any sequences that do not match, and repeating the process until the desired sample size is reached.

To learn more about sample visit:

https://brainly.com/question/27829028

#SPJ4

Taking into account the definition of probability, the value of P(A∪B) is 0.686.

Probability  is the possibility that a phenomenon or an event will happen, given certain circumstances. It is expressed as a percentage.

The union of events, AUB and reas as "A or B", is the event formed by all the elements of A and B. That is, the event AUB is verified when one of the two, A or B, or both occurs.

The probability of the union of two compatible events is calculated as the sum of their probabilities subtracting the probability of their intersection:

P(A∪B)= P(A) + P(B) -P(A∩B)

where the intersection of events, A∩B, is the event formed by all the elements that are, at the same time, from A and B. That is, the event A ∩ B is verified when A and B occur simultaneously.

You know:

In this case, considering the definition of union of eventes, you get:

P(A∪B)= 0.4 + 0.66 -0.374

Solving:

P(A∪B)= 0.686

Finally, P(A∪B) has a value of 0.686

Learn more about probability:

brainly.com/question/25839839

#SPJ1