what is the standard form equation of the ellipse that has vertices (4,−10) and (4,6) and co-vertices (3,−2) and (5,−2)?

The given joint probability mass function defines the probabilities of the discrete random variables x and y taking on values 1, 2, or 3.

The probability p(x = x, y = y) is equal to xy/54 for all (x, y) in the set {(1, 1), (1, 2), (1, 3), (2, 1), (2, 2), (2, 3), (3, 1), (3, 2), (3, 3)}.  To find the marginal probability mass functions for x and y, we sum the joint probabilities over all possible values of the other variable. That is,

p(x = x) = ∑ p(x = x, y = y) = ∑ xy/54, y=1 to 3

         = (x/54)∑y=1 to 3 y

         = (x/54)(1+2+3)

         = (x/54)(6)

         = x/9

Similarly, we have

p(y = y) = ∑ p(x = x, y = y) = ∑ xy/54, x=1 to 3

         = (y/54)∑x=1 to 3 x

         = (y/54)(1+2+3)

         = (y/54)(6)

         = y/9

Hence, the marginal probability mass functions for x and y are given by p(x) = x/9 and p(y) = y/9, respectively.

Learn more about marginal probability here: brainly.com/question/30163439

#SPJ11

Answer:

a) 345

b) 0.0000002

Step-by-step explanation:

a)  We can multiply the 2.3 and 1.5 and 10^4 and 10^-2 together and simplify at the end.

Step 1:  Working out 2.3 * 1.5:

2.3 * 1.5 = 3.45

Step 2:  Working out 10^4 * 10^-2:

The product rule of exponents states that when you're multiplying the same bases with different exponents, you add the exponents.

So, 10^4 * 10^-2 = 10^(4 + (-2)) = 10^(4 - 2) = 10^2

Step 3:  Simplifying:  

Thus, we have 3.45*10^2 = 3.45 * 100 = 345

Step 4:  Checking our answer:  

We can check by doing the operations inside each parentheses instead of taking them out and seeing whether we still get 345 (i.e., the answer we got when we multiplied common terms instead):

(2.3 * 10^4) * (1.5 * 10^-2)

(2.3 * 10000) * (1.5 * 0.01)

23000 * 0.015

345

Thus, our answer is correct and 345 is the standard form of (2.3 * 10^4) * (1.5 * 10^-2)

b)  Similar to our process for part a), we can divide 3.6 by 1.8 and then divide 10^-5 by 10^2 and simplify at the end.

Step 1:  Working out 3.8 / 1.8:  

3.6 / 1.8 = 2

Step 2:  Working out 10^-5 / 10^2:  

The quotient rule of exponents states that when we divide the same bases with different exponents, we subtract the exponents.

Thus, 10^-5 / 10^2 = 10^(-5 - 2) = 10^-7

Step 3:  Simplifying:

2 * 10^-7 = 2 * 0.0000001 = 0.0000002

Step 4:  Checking our answer:

We can check by doing the operations inside each parentheses instead of taking them out and seeing whether we still get 0.0000002 (i.e., the answer we got when we multiplied common terms instead):

(3.6 * 10^-5) / (1.8 * 10^2)

(3.6 * 0.00001) / (1.8 * 100)

0.000036 / 180

0.0000002

Thus, our answer is correct and 0.0000002 is the standard form of (3.6 * 10^-5) / (1.8 * 10^2)

Answer:

18ft

Step-by-step explanation:

6/27= 4.5, 27/4. 4.5x4=18

Answer:

18ft

Step-by-step explanation:

I am taking the test right now and I think this would be the correct answer!

A simple way I found out: 6/4 = 1.5 so I took 1.5 and divided 27 by it.  27/1.5 = 18

Hope this helped!

Marked price: 39 dollars

Selling price: 31 dollars

Discount: ???

Subtract the post-discount price from the pre-discount price.

31-39=-8

Divide this new number by the pre-discount price.

-8/39=-0.20512820512

Multiply the resultant number by 100.

-0.20512820512×100= -20.512820512

Round the number

-20.512820512 → -20.5

The discount was %20.5 off

I hoped I solved your question, if I did not you can tell me and I would be more than glad to fix it ૮ ˶ᵔ ᵕ ᵔ˶ ა

The fraction of tomatoe recipe greater than 1 used is 7/4

The question requires that we Subtract the required value of tomato recipe from 1

The subtraction expression can be written thus ;

Amount of tomatoe recipe - 1

[tex]2 \frac{3}{4} - 1[/tex]

Converting to a proper fraction;

11/4 - 1/1

Take L.C.M of the denominator

L.C.M of 4 and 1 is 4

11/4 - 1/1 = (11 - 4)/4

11/4 - 1/1 = 7/4

Therefore, the fraction of tomatoe greater than 1 used is 7/4

Learn more about fraction ; https://brainly.com/question/32315152

#SPJ1

Statement: "Statistical errors: p values, the gold standard of statistical validity, are not as reliable as many scientists assume."

P values are a commonly used statistical measure that provides a way to determine whether the observed results of an experiment or study are statistically significant or just due to chance. A p value is the probability of obtaining results as extreme as or more extreme than the observed results, assuming that the null hypothesis (i.e., no effect) is true.

However, in recent years, there has been growing concern that p values are not as reliable as previously assumed. Some scientists argue that p values can be misleading and that they are often misinterpreted or overemphasized.

One reason for this is that p values do not provide information about effect size or the clinical relevance of the observed results. A statistically significant result may not necessarily be practically significant or meaningful in a real-world context.

Another issue is that p values are highly dependent on sample size and can be influenced by the choice of statistical test or the pre-specified significance level. This means that p values can vary widely between studies even if the underlying effect is the same.

Therefore, some scientists are calling for a shift away from relying solely on p values and advocating for a more holistic approach to statistical analysis that takes into account effect size, confidence intervals, and other measures of uncertainty.

To learn more about null hypothesis click here

brainly.com/question/28920252

#SPJ11

Approximately 91.92% of test-takers scored higher than 69 on this standardized test.

To find the percentage of scores that are greater than 69, we need to standardize the score by calculating its z-score:

z = (69 - 90) / 15 = -1.4

The z-score represents the number of standard deviations away from the mean a score is. Since the normal distribution is symmetric, we can find the percentage of scores greater than 69 by finding the area under the curve to the right of the z-score.

Using a standard normal distribution table or calculator, we find that the area to the right of a z-score of -1.4 is 0.9192.

Therefore, the percentage of scores greater than 69 is:

0.9192 x 100% = 91.92%

To learn more about normally distributed click on,

https://brainly.com/question/10692760

#SPJ4

There is insufficient evidence to conclude that the mean blood pressure for women is different from the mean blood pressure for men. To determine whether the mean blood pressure for women is equal to the mean blood pressure for men, a t-test is conducted using the sample data of 16 women (group 1) and their respective brothers' blood pressures (group 2).

The null hypothesis states that the means are equal, and the alternative hypothesis suggests they are different. The test statistic is calculated, critical points are identified, and the null hypothesis is either accepted or rejected based on the test results.

To carry out the t-test, we first calculate the test statistic. The formula for the test statistic (t) in this case is:

t = (x1 - x2) / sqrt((s1^2 / n1) + (s2^2 / n2))

where x1 and x2 are the sample means, s1 and s2 are the sample standard deviations, and n1 and n2 are the sample sizes.

Given:

x1 = 119.4 (average blood pressure for women)

x2 = 121.2 (average blood pressure for men)

s2d = 25 (pooled sample variance)

n1 = n2 = 16 (sample sizes)

α = 0.05 (Type I error value)

Now, we can calculate the test statistic:

t = (119.4 - 121.2) / sqrt((25/16) + (25/16))

 = -1.8 / sqrt(3.125 + 3.125)

 = -1.8 / sqrt(6.25)

 = -1.8 / 2.5

 = -0.72

Next, we determine the relevant critical point(s) for the t-test. Since the sample size is small (n1 = n2 = 16), we refer to the t-distribution with degrees of freedom equal to n1 + n2 - 2 = 30 - 2 = 28. Using a significance level (α) of 0.05, the critical value for a two-tailed test is approximately ±2.048.

Since the absolute value of the test statistic (0.72) is less than the critical value (2.048), we fail to reject the null hypothesis.

Learn more about null hypothesis here:

brainly.com/question/19263925

#SPJ11

The light should be placed in the middle of the triangle parkway in order to meet the aim of having it at the same distance from each of the three roadways.

Since we want the light to be equally far from all three streets in this scenario, that means we want it to be equally far from each side of the triangle parkway.

In light of this requirement, the lamppost ought to be put in the middle of the triangle parkway. This is due to the incenter's equidistant location from all three sides, which ensures that the distance between the lamppost and each side of the triangle is equal.

More about the triangle link is given below.

https://brainly.com/question/25813512

#SPJ1

A point on the edge of a 45 rpm record is moving 0.18 ft/sec faster than a point on the edge of a 33 rpm record.

To compare the speeds of the two records, we need to find the linear velocity of a point on the edge of each record. The linear velocity is the distance traveled by a point on the edge of the record in a given time.

For the 45 rpm record, the diameter is 7 inches, which means the radius is 3.5 inches (7/2). The circumference of the record is then 2πr = 2π(3.5) = 22 inches. To convert this to feet, we divide by 12 to get 1.83 feet.

The linear velocity of a point on the edge of the 45 rpm record is then:

V45 = 1.83 ft/circumference x 45 rev/min x 1 min/60 sec = 1.91 ft/sec

For the 33 rpm record, the diameter is 12 inches, which means the radius is 6 inches (12/2). The circumference of the record is then 2πr = 2π(6) = 37.7 inches. To convert this to feet, we divide by 12 to get 3.14 feet.

The linear velocity of a point on the edge of the 33 rpm record is then:

V33 = 3.14 ft/circumference x 33 rev/min x 1 min/60 sec = 1.73 ft/sec

The difference in speeds between the two records is then:

V45 - V33 = 1.91 ft/sec - 1.73 ft/sec = 0.18 ft/sec

Therefore, a point on the edge of a 45 rpm record is moving 0.18 ft/sec faster than a point on the edge of a 33 rpm record.

for such more question on speeds

https://brainly.com/question/23377525

#SPJ11

No, in the above, case, my friend is incorrect. The value of x is 36. This is solved using the knowledge of arcs.

Because the measure of each arc is the angle formed by that arc at the center of the circle, the total of all arc measurements that comprise that circle is 360 degrees.

Thus,

∡MB = 4x

∡NB = x

∡AM = X

∡AN = 4x (alternate angles)

Based ont he above assertion about arcs,

∡MB + ∡NB +∡AM +∡AN = 360

Hence,

4x + x + x + 4x = 360

10x = 360

x = 360/10

x = 36

Learn more about arcs at:

https://brainly.com/question/2005046

#SPJ1

The gradient of the function at the point (3, 8) is given by the vector (-5/7, -3/49), and the maximum rate of change of the function at this point is sqrt(354/2401).

The gradient of a function is a vector that points in the direction of the maximum rate of change of the function and its magnitude gives the rate of change at that point. To find the gradient of the function z = ln(x^2 - y)x - 1 at the point (3, 8), we need to take the partial derivatives of z with respect to x and y, and evaluate them at the point (3, 8).

The partial derivative of z with respect to x is given by (2x - y)/(x^2 - y) and the partial derivative of z with respect to y is -x/(x^2 - y). Therefore, the gradient of z is given by the vector:

∇z = [(2x - y)/(x^2 - y)] i - [x/(x^2 - y)] j

We can now evaluate this gradient vector at the point (3, 8) by substituting x = 3 and y = 8:

∇z(3, 8) = [-5/7] i - [3/49] j

This tells us that the maximum rate of change of the function at the point (3, 8) is in the direction of the vector [-5/7, -3/49], and the rate of change in this direction is given by the magnitude of the gradient vector, which is |∇z(3, 8)| = sqrt((25/49) + (9/2401)) = sqrt(354/2401).

So the gradient of the function at the point (3, 8) is given by the vector (-5/7, -3/49), and the maximum rate of change of the function at this point is sqrt(354/2401).

Learn more about vector at: brainly.com/question/29740341

#SPJ11

According to the model, an additional 10 minutes waiting in line would cause a customer to lower his or her rating by 1.

To determine the additional minutes waiting in line that would cause a customer to lower their rating by 1, we set s = 4 (since 5 - 1 = 4) in the equation and solve for m:

Given: s = -0.10m + 5

where:

s = the numerical rating given by the customer

m = the number of minutes the customer spent waiting in line.

So, 4 = -0.10m + 5

-0.10m = -1

m = 10

Therefore, based on the model, an additional 10 minutes waiting in line would cause a customer to lower their rating by 1.

Read more about equation at brainly.com/question/29174899

#SPJ1

The annual interest rate on the $5600 loan, with $1008 of interest accrued over 4 years, is 4.5%, as calculated using the formula for simple interest. Option B.

To find the annual interest rate, we can use the formula for simple interest: I = P * R * T, where I is the interest, P is the principal amount (loan amount), R is the interest rate, and T is the time in years.

Given that the loan amount is $5600 and the interest after 4 years is $1008, we can rearrange the formula to solve for R. In this case, R = (I / P) / T = (1008 / 5600) / 4 = 0.045 = 4.5%. Therefore, the annual interest rate on the loan is 4.5%. The correct answer is option (b) 4.5%.

Learn more about Simple interest here: brainly.com/question/30964674

#SPJ11

The area of the triangle is given by the formula:

A =  (3/2)x² + 11x - 8

Which is the one in option b.

Remember that for a triangle of base B and height H, the area is given by the formula:

A = B*H/2

Here we know that the height is:

H = 8 + x

The base is:

B = 3x - 2

Then the area of the triangle is:

A = (8 + x)*(3x - 2)/2

A = (24x - 16 + 3x² - 2x)/2

A = (3x² + 22x - 16)/2

A = (3/2)x² + 11x - 8

Then the correct option is B (though the constant term is -8 instead of -9)

Learn more about triangles at:

https://brainly.com/question/1058720

#SPJ1

There are 8 major routes from the center of Happy Town to the center of Peaceful Town that go through the center of Miserable Town, we need to use the concept of permutations and combinations.

There are 5 major routes from Happy Town to Miserable Town, and 3 major routes from Miserable Town to Peaceful Town. Therefore, there are a total of 5 x 3 = 15 possible routes from Happy Town to Peaceful Town via Miserable Town. However, not all of these routes are unique. Some of them may overlap or follow the same path. To eliminate these duplicates, we need to consider the routes that start from Happy Town, pass through Miserable Town, and end at Peaceful Town as a group. Since there are 5 routes from Happy Town to Miserable Town, we can choose any one of them as the starting point. Similarly, since there are 3 routes from Miserable Town to Peaceful Town, we can choose any one of them as the ending point. Therefore, there are 5 x 3 = 15 possible combinations of starting and ending points. However, we have counted each route twice, once for each direction. So, we need to divide the total number of combinations by 2 to get the final answer. Therefore, the number of major routes from the center of Happy Town to the center of Peaceful Town that go through the center of Miserable Town is 15 / 2 = 7.5. However, since we cannot have half a route, we round up to the nearest whole number.

Learn more about combinations here:

https://brainly.com/question/19692242

#SPJ11

The force of friction is equal to the centripetal force, which is given by the formula Fc = mv²/r, where m is the mass of the worker, v is the speed of the worker, and r is the radius of the circle. After plugging in the values, we get a force of friction of 55.97 N.

The problem requires us to calculate the force of friction necessary to keep the merry-go-round worker from falling off the platform. To solve this problem, we need to use the concept of centripetal force. Centripetal force is the force required to keep an object moving in a circular path. In this case, the force of friction is acting as the centripetal force to keep the worker moving in a circular path.

We are given the mass of the worker, which is 65 kg, and her speed, which is 4.1 m/s. We also know that the worker is standing 5.3 meters away from the center of the merry-go-round. To calculate the force of friction, we can use the formula for centripetal force, which is Fc = mv²/r, where Fc is the centripetal force, m is the mass of the worker, v is the speed of the worker, and r is the radius of the circle.

After substituting the given values, we get:

Fc = (65 kg)(4.1 m/s)²/5.3 m

Fc = 55.97 N

Therefore, the force of friction required to keep the worker from falling off the platform is 55.97 N.

Learn more about Radius:

brainly.com/question/811328

#SPJ11

The domain of the function f(x, y) = ln(6 − x^2 − 5y^2) is the set of all (x, y) pairs such that 6 − x^2 − 5y^2 is positive.

The natural logarithmic function ln is defined only for positive arguments. Therefore, for f(x, y) = ln(6 − x^2 − 5y^2) to be defined, the argument 6 − x^2 − 5y^2 must be positive.

To find the domain of the function, we solve the inequality:

6 − x^2 − 5y^2 > 0

Rearranging, we get:

x^2 + 5y^2 < 6

This is the equation of an ellipse centered at the origin with semi-axes lengths a = √6 and b = √(6/5). Therefore, the domain of f(x, y) is the interior of this ellipse. That is, the set of all (x, y) pairs such that x^2 + 5y^2 is less than 6. In interval notation, this can be written as:

{(x, y) | x^2 + 5y^2 < 6}

Learn more about function here:

brainly.com/question/4822606

#SPJ11

At the beginning of 2024, Wagner made significant changes in accounting for investment, corrected errors, and implemented new policies. These changes may have a significant impact on the financial statements of the company.

The changes made by Wagner could affect the financial statements of the company in several ways. For example, changes in accounting methods could affect the way revenue and expenses are recognized, which could affect the company's profitability.

Correcting errors in previous financial statements could also have an impact on the company's financial position, as well as its reputation with investors and other stakeholders.

Finally, the introduction of new accounting policies could result in changes to the way financial information is presented, which could affect the way investors and other stakeholders interpret the company's financial statements. It is therefore important for Wagner to communicate these changes to stakeholders and ensure that the financial statements accurately reflect the company's financial position and performance.

Learn more about investment here:

brainly.com/question/20080933

#SPJ11

Complete Question:

Change in accounting principle: Wagner changed its method of accounting for the investment in Wise, Inc. from the previous method to the equity method. The reporting approach used is the retrospective approach, which involves adjusting the financial statements for prior periods to reflect the new method of accounting.

If u is an orthogonal matrix and v is constructed by interchanging some of the columns of u, then v is also an orthogonal matrix. This is because the columns of an orthogonal matrix are orthonormal.

An orthogonal matrix is a square matrix whose columns are orthonormal. This means that each column has a length of 1 and is orthogonal to all the other columns. Formally, this can be written as:

u^T u = u u^T = I

where u^T is the transpose of u and I is the identity matrix.

Now suppose we construct a new matrix v by interchanging some of the columns of u. Let's say we interchange columns j and k, where j and k are distinct column indices of u. Then the matrix v is given by:

v = [u_1, u_2, ..., u_{j-1}, u_k, u_{j+1}, ..., u_{k-1}, u_j, u_{k+1}, ..., u_n]

where u_i is the ith column of u.

To show that v is orthogonal, we need to show that its columns are orthonormal. Let's consider the jth and kth columns of v. By construction, these columns are u_k and u_j, respectively, and we know from the properties of u that:

u_j^T u_k = 0 and u_j^T u_j = u_k^T u_k = 1

Therefore, the jth and kth columns of v are orthogonal and have a length of 1, which means they are orthonormal. Moreover, all the other columns of v are also orthonormal because they are simply copies of the corresponding columns of u, which are already orthonormal.

Finally, we can show that v is indeed an orthogonal matrix by verifying that v^T v = v v^T = I, using the definition of v and the properties of u. This completes the proof that v is an orthogonal matrix.

Learn more about orthogonal matrix:

brainly.com/question/31629623

#SPJ11

Answer:

(12 - 2 √22) ft

Step-by-step explanation:

by Pythagoras' Theorem:

in right-angled triangle, the square of the hypotenuse will equal the sum of the squares of the other two sides.

call the ladder L, call the distance of bottom of ladder from bottom of wall G, call the vertical height of the wall where the top of ladder meets it H.

we have L² = G² + H²

H² = L² - G²

   = 13² - 5²

   = 169 - 25

   = 144

H = √144 = 12.

the ladder is opposite the right-angle, ie it's the hypotenuse.

the ladder is 5ft from the wall.

if bottom of ladder is pulled out 4ft more, this reduces the height H.

the length of ladder L remains the same (can't compress a ladder)

G, the floor distance, is now 5 + 4 = 9ft

H² = L² - G²

    = 169 - 9²

    = 169 - 81

    = 88

H = √88

   = √(4 X 22)

   = √4 X √22

   = 2√22

The vertical height, H, was 12 ft.  it's now 2 √22

so it has moved down the wall (12 - 2 √22) ft.

To find the values of k for which the matrix a is singular, we need to determine when the determinant of a is equal to 0.

The determinant of a 2x2 matrix is simply the product of the diagonal elements minus the product of the off-diagonal elements. For a 3x3 matrix like a, we need to use a more complex formula:

det(a) = 1*(2*2 - k*1) - 2*(1*2 - k*1) + k*(1*2 - 2*k)

Simplifying this expression, we get:

det(a) = 4 - 2k - 4 + 2k + 2k²
det(a) = 2k²

So, det(a) is equal to 0 when k is equal to 0 or when k is equal to 0. Therefore, the matrix a is singular when k is equal to 0.

Explanation: To determine when a matrix is singular, we need to find when its determinant is equal to 0. We used the formula for the determinant of a 3x3 matrix to calculate the determinant of a and then solved for the values of k that make det(a) equal to 0.

To know more about matrix visit :-

https://brainly.com/question/27929071

#SPJ11

Answer:

4/3

Step-by-step explanation:

Divide 1 by 3/4 to find out how many groups.

1 divided by 3/4 is 4/3

The measure of the various angles are:

∠1= 130°

∠3 = 130°

∠5= 50°

∠6= 130°

Lines m and l are the parallel lines and a line 'n' is a transverse intersecting these lines.

m∠2 = 50°

m∠1 + m∠2 = 180° [Linear pair of angles]

m∠1 = 180° - 50°

m∠1 = 130°

m∠3 = m∠1 = 130° [Vertically opposite angles]

m∠3 + m∠5 = 180° [Consecutive interior angles]

m∠5 = 180° - m∠3

       = 180° - 130°

m∠5   = 50°

m∠6 + m∠5 = 180° [Linear pair of angles]

m∠6 = 180° - 50°

m∠6= 130°

Hence,  the measure of the various angles are:

∠1= 130°

∠3 = 130°

∠5= 50°

∠6= 130°

Learn more about angles at:

https://brainly.com/question/25770607

#SPJ1

Full Question:

Although part of your question is missing, you might be referring to this full question:

See the attached image.

The appropriate statistical tool to measure the strength and direction of the relationship between two cardinal variables is correlation.

Correlation is a statistical method used to measure the relationship between two continuous variables. It measures the degree of association between two variables and provides information on both the direction and strength of the relationship. Correlation coefficients range from -1 to +1, with a value of -1 indicating a perfect negative relationship, 0 indicating no relationship, and +1 indicating a perfect positive relationship.

ANOVA and t test for dependent means are appropriate for comparing means between groups or conditions, whereas chi square test for association is appropriate for examining the relationship between categorical variables. Therefore, none of these statistical tests would be appropriate for measuring the relationship between two cardinal variables. Correlation, on the other hand, is specifically designed for measuring the relationship between continuous variables and is the appropriate statistical tool for this purpose.

Learn more about statistical tool here:

brainly.com/question/31361931

#SPJ11

Suppose that f(x) = −3x4 is an antiderivative of f(x) and g(x) = 2x3 is an antiderivative of g(x). The valsue of  ∫(f(x) g(x))dx is " -108/5 + C", where C is the constant of integration.

To find the integral of the product of two functions, we can use the formula ∫(f(x) g(x))dx = f(x) ∫g(x)dx - ∫[f'(x) (∫g(x)dx)]dx. Using this formula, we can evaluate the given integral as follows:

∫(f(x) g(x))dx = (-3x^4)(2x^3) - ∫[(-12x^3)(2x^3)]dx = -6x^7 + 24x^6/2 + C = -108/5 + C.

Therefore, the answer is " -108/5 + C".

You can learn more about antiderivative at

https://brainly.com/question/21627352

#SPJ11

Answer:

60

Explanation:

triangles are supposed to add up to 180 on the inside

you have a right angle which equals 90

and the other angle is 30

90+30 is 120

180-120 is 60

X=60

The height of the pole would be 29.94 feet.

The scenario results in the formation of a right angle triangle.

The length of the support wire represents the hypotenuse of the right angle triangle.

The ground distance between the wire and the pole represents the adjacent side of the right angle triangle.

The height of the pole represents the opposite side of the right angle triangle.

To determine the height of the pole, h, we would apply Pythagoras theorem

Hypotenuse² = opposite side² + adjacent side²

18² = 10² + h²

324 = 100 + h²

h² = 324 - 100 = 224

h = √224 = 14.97

The wire meets the pole halfway up the pole.

The height of the pole would be

14.97 × 2 = 29.94 feet

Hence, The height of the pole would be 29.94 feet.

To learn more on Pythagorean theorem click:

brainly.com/question/24302120

#SPJ1

complete question:

An 18 foot support wire is attached to a vertical pole. The wire is attached to the ground 10 feet away from the pole. If the wire meets the pole halfway up the pole, how y'all is the pole in feet?

The solution to the system of equations is (-10/3, 22/15) means there is only one unique solution.

The solution to the system of linear equations need to find the point the two lines intersect.

From the given information can see that one line passes through (-10, 4), (-5, 3) and (0, 2) the other line passes through (-8, 0), (-5, 3) and (0, 8).

The equations of the two lines using the slope-intercept form:

Line 1:

slope = (3-4)/(-5+10)

= -1/5

Using the point-slope form with the point (-5, 3), we get:

y - 3 = (-1/5)(x + 5)

Simplifying, we get:

y = (-1/5)x + 4

Line 2:

slope = (3-0)/(-5+8) = 1

Using the point-slope form with the point (-5, 3), we get:

y - 3 = 1(x + 5)

Simplifying, we get:

y = x + 8

Now, we can set the two equations equal to each other and solve for x:

(-1/5)x + 4 = x + 8

Multiplying both sides by 5, we get:

x + 20 = 5x + 40

Simplifying, we get:

6x = -20

x = -10/3

Substituting x = -10/3 into either equation, we can solve for y:

y = (-1/5)(-10/3) + 4 = 22/15

For similar questions on unique solution

https://brainly.com/question/29141035

#SPJ11