The territories the US get from the Spanish-American War are Puerto Rico and Cuba. Option a is correct.
The United States acquired Puerto Rico, Guam, and the Philippines from the Spanish-American War. After the US defeated Spain in 1898, the Treaty of Paris was signed. Under the treaty, Spain agreed to recognize Cuba's independence and relinquished sovereignty over Guam, Puerto Rico, and the Philippines to the US.
Hawaii, on the other hand, was annexed by the United States in 1898, even though it wasn't a result of the Spanish-American War. The US officially took control of Hawaii in 1898 after overthrowing the Hawaiian monarchy in 1893.
Therefore, the correct option from the given alternatives is (a) Puerto Rico and Cuba.
Learn more about Spanish-American War https://brainly.com/question/2827989
#SPJ11
The correct option among the given options is b) Hawaii and Guam. More than 100 words: Spanish-American War (1898) fought between Spain and the US in Cuba and the Philippines.
The conflict arose due to the US support to Cuban independence and its interest in taking over Spanish colonies in the Pacific. The US defeated the Spanish fleet in Manila Bay and occupied the Philippines, Guam, and Puerto Rico, while also acquiring Hawaii.The US annexed Hawaii in 1898, during the Spanish-American War. The islands became a territory of the US after they were ceded by the Hawaiian government to the US government in 1898. The US wanted Hawaii because of its sugar industry and its strategic location in the Pacific. Guam, on the other hand, was ceded to the US as part of the Treaty of Paris, which ended the Spanish-American War in 1898.The US also acquired Puerto Rico from Spain as part of the Treaty of Paris. Puerto Rico became a territory of the US, which gave the US control of the Caribbean region and a strategic naval base in the Atlantic. The Philippines were also acquired by the US as a result of the Spanish-American War. The US fought against Filipino rebels for three years before taking control of the islands in 1901.Panama was not part of the US territories gained from the Spanish-American War. However, the US did acquire control of the Panama Canal Zone in 1903 after supporting Panama's independence from Colombia. The US controlled the Panama Canal Zone until 1979.
To know more about Hawaii visit :-
https://brainly.com/question/7979174
#SPJ11
Indonesia
what is orwell ridiculing in this passage? a. the hypocrisy of some leaders b. the uncleanliness of pigs
c. the frivolity of some rules d. the ridiculousness of sheets
Orwell ridicules the hypocrisy of some leaders in this passage.
In this passage, Orwell uses the allegorical depiction of pigs to criticize the hypocrisy of some leaders. The pigs in the story of Animal Farm, which serves as a satirical representation of the Soviet Union, initially rebel against their human oppressors in pursuit of a fair and equal society. However, as time progresses, the pigs gradually adopt human-like behaviors and become corrupt leaders themselves. They start to exploit the other animals, manipulate the rules, and live a life of privilege, contradicting the principles they once fought for. Through this portrayal, Orwell highlights the hypocrisy of leaders who claim to champion the cause of the common people but end up succumbing to the allure of power and becoming oppressive themselves.
The pigs' hypocrisy becomes evident in their actions and attitudes. For instance, they modify the original commandments of Animalism, which were meant to ensure equality, and rewrite them to suit their own interests. They manipulate language and twist the rules to justify their actions, such as engaging in trade with humans despite condemning such behavior initially. These actions expose the pigs' disregard for the principles they initially advocated and reveal their willingness to compromise their own ideals for personal gain.
By ridiculing the hypocrisy of some leaders through the portrayal of the pigs, Orwell provides a critique of political systems and warns against the dangers of unchecked power. He highlights the tendency of leaders to prioritize their self-interests and abandon the principles they once championed, ultimately betraying the trust of those they were supposed to serve.
Learn more about Hypocrisy
brainly.com/question/29886703
#SPJ11
Which TWO things were unusual about the Jewish Golden Age under Muslim rule in Spain?
The Jews eventually outnumbered and conquered the Muslims.
Jews, Christians, and Muslims generally lived and worked together in peace.
Jewish scholars created new works in philosophy, science, mathematics, and poetry.
The Muslims allowed equal representation in the government.
Explanation:
jewish scholars created new works in philosophy and sciences
Jews and Christian's lines and worked together
n the antebellum period, which of the following was in the Old Southwest
Virginia
North Carolina
Mississippi
Georgia
South Carolina
In the antebellum period, Mississippi was in the Old Southwest.
Antebellum refers to the period preceding the American Civil War that took place between 1861 and 1865. During this period, slavery was one of the prominent issues in the country. There was an increase in the number of cotton plantations in the Old Southwest.
Mississippi, being one of the states in the Old Southwest, had a growing number of cotton plantations as the state was regarded as a prime location for the production of cotton. The growth of the cotton industry led to the expansion of slavery in the region, with Mississippi being the state with the highest number of enslaved people. Slavery played a crucial role in the region's economy, and many of the wealthier families owned many slaves, who worked in the cotton plantations, performing various activities, such as planting, weeding, and harvesting.
Learn more about Antebellum here: https://brainly.com/question/15071749
#SPJ11
During the Antebellum period, Mississippi was in the Old Southwest. The Antebellum period in the United States lasted from 1783 to 1861, and it was the period that preceded the American Civil War.
During this period, America experienced economic, social, and political changes that shaped its future. The Old Southwest refers to the states that were formed after the American Revolution that lie west of the Appalachian Mountains. The states that made up the Old Southwest include Mississippi, Alabama, Arkansas, Louisiana, Florida, and parts of Tennessee.The Old Southwest became the center of American slavery, and cotton became the staple crop for the region. Slavery and cotton drove the economic growth in the Old Southwest, which later caused a rift between the region and the northern states that opposed slavery. Mississippi was particularly known for its large cotton plantations, which were worked by enslaved Africans.The Old Southwest played a significant role in American history, especially during the Antebellum period. It was the center of American slavery and the cotton trade that fueled the American economy.
To know more about Antebellum visit :-
https://brainly.com/question/17558811
#SPJ11
the last major expansion of suffrage in the united states involved the criterion of
The last major expansion of suffrage in the United States involved the criterion of age.
The passage of the 26th Amendment to the United States Constitution in 1971 lowered the voting age from 21 to 18. This expansion of suffrage came in response to the growing social and political activism of young people during the 1960s, particularly in relation to the Vietnam War. The amendment addressed the issue of young adults being drafted into the military and fighting in the war while being denied the right to vote. By lowering the voting age to 18, the amendment ensured that those old enough to fight and be directly affected by government policies had the right to participate in the democratic process.
To know more about expansion of suffrage, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/10422953
#SPJ11
nixon’s plan to end the vietnam war through the strategy of vietnamization
Nixon's plan to end the Vietnam War was called "Vietnamization," which involved gradually withdrawing American troops while strengthening South Vietnamese forces to take on a more active role in the conflict.
How did Nixon plan to end the Vietnam War?Nixon's plan to end the Vietnam War was centered around the strategy of "Vietnamization." It was announced in 1969 and aimed to shift the burden of the war from the United States to South Vietnam, gradually reducing the direct American involvement.
The key elements of the Vietnamization strategy included:
1. Gradual Withdrawal: Nixon planned to gradually withdraw American troops from Vietnam while simultaneously increasing the training and equipping of South Vietnamese forces. The goal was to enable the South Vietnamese military to take on a more active role in the conflict.
2. Strengthening South Vietnamese Forces: The United States provided substantial military assistance to South Vietnam, including weapons, training, and advisory support. The objective was to enhance the capabilities and effectiveness of the South Vietnamese military so that they could defend themselves against the North Vietnamese forces.
3. Negotiations: Nixon sought a diplomatic solution to the war and aimed to facilitate negotiations between North Vietnam, South Vietnam, and the United States. The hope was to reach a peace agreement that would bring an end to the conflict.
4. Bombing Campaign: Despite the emphasis on Vietnamization, Nixon also authorized intense bombing campaigns, particularly against North Vietnam and parts of neighboring countries like Cambodia and Laos. The purpose of these bombings was to weaken the North Vietnamese military and put pressure on them to negotiate.
The Vietnamization policy faced several challenges and criticisms. One major challenge was the lack of progress in peace negotiations, which continued for several years. Additionally, the policy was met with opposition and skepticism from those who believed that South Vietnam was not capable of defending itself without significant American support.
Ultimately, the Vietnam War continued until 1975, and the Paris Peace Accords were signed in 1973, which formally ended the direct U.S. military involvement in the conflict. However, South Vietnam eventually fell to the North Vietnamese forces in 1975, leading to the reunification of Vietnam under communist rule.
Learn more about: Vietnam War
brainly.com/question/31746600
#SPJ11
which south american empire was the largest in pre-columbian south america?
The South American Empire that was the largest in pre-Columbian South America was the Inca Empire. It was one of the most significant empires in the world. It was established in the 13th century in the Andean region of South America and ruled until the Spanish conquest in the 16th century.
The Inca Empire was located in what is now Peru, Bolivia, Ecuador, Chile, and Argentina, and it was the largest empire in pre-Columbian South America. The empire was highly organized and had an extensive road network and a sophisticated administrative system.
The Incas developed a unique system of record-keeping known as the quipu, a system of knotted strings used to store information. The empire had a complex social hierarchy, with the emperor or Sapa Inca at the top, followed by the nobility, and then the common people. The Inca Empire was also known for its remarkable architecture, including the famous Machu Picchu, an ancient Inca city perched high in the Andes Mountains.
The Inca Empire was a significant cultural force in South America, and its influence can still be seen today in the Andean region. The Inca Empire was a dominant force in South America, but it was ultimately brought down by the Spanish conquest, which brought diseases, war, and colonization to the region. Despite this, the legacy of the Inca Empire continues to be felt in South America today, and it is recognized as one of the most important empires in the history of the world.
To know more about South American Empire visit:
https://brainly.com/question/30213470
#SPJ11
why was the american military one of the first institutions in american society to abandon segregation?
The American military was one of the first institutions in American society to abandon segregation due to strategic and political reasons.
The American military's decision to abandon segregation can be attributed to a combination of strategic and political factors. First and foremost, the United States was engaged in World War II, fighting against fascist powers that propagated racial superiority and discrimination. In order to present a united front against these ideologies and to project an image of equality and democracy, it became imperative for the American military to address its own system of racial segregation.
Additionally, the military leadership recognized that segregation hindered the overall effectiveness of the armed forces. The policy of segregating troops based on race limited the pool of available talent and expertise. As the war effort escalated, there was a growing need for skilled personnel in various roles, regardless of their racial background. Abandoning segregation allowed the military to tap into the full potential of its diverse population and utilize the skills of all individuals, thereby strengthening the armed forces.
Politically, the pressure for desegregation was mounting both domestically and internationally. African Americans and their allies in the civil rights movement were demanding equal rights and an end to segregation in all aspects of society. The racial discrimination present within the military contradicted the principles of freedom and equality that the United States claimed to uphold. To maintain its moral authority and credibility, the government had to address these demands and begin dismantling the barriers of segregation.
Learn more about Segregation
brainly.com/question/14330237
#SPJ11
Nationalism spread under Napoleon when people began to unite themselves as part of a common bond that included _____.
a. Cultural heritage
b. Language
c. Political ideals
d. All of the above
Nationalism spread under Napoleon when people began to unite themselves as part of a common bond that included cultural heritage, language, and political ideals (D. All of the above).
What is Nationalism?Nationalism refers to a sense of belonging to one's country, language, or culture. Nationalism is an ideology that promotes loyalty and devotion to one's country. It is a feeling of shared identity that transcends geographical, linguistic, and ethnic boundaries.
The spread of Nationalism under NapoleonUnder Napoleon, nationalism gained momentum. Napoleon was able to tap into the people's sense of patriotism, uniting them under a common banner. He was able to spread the idea of nationalism by promoting French culture, language, and political ideals. The French government made an attempt to impose French culture on its occupied territories. In the occupied territories, they implemented policies that emphasized French language and culture.
For example, the French government abolished feudalism, which was prevalent in many European countries at the time. The French government also attempted to impose a single code of law throughout the country. Napoleon's rise to power brought about an era of change. He united France and created a sense of national identity. Napoleon's conquests and the French Revolution brought about a new era in European history, marked by nationalism.
Therefore, the correct answer is d) All of the above
Learn more about Nationalism here: https://brainly.com/question/29271402
#SPJ11
Nationalism spread under Napoleon when people began to unite themselves as part of a common bond that included all of the above - cultural heritage, language, and political ideals.
The emergence of Nationalism under Napoleon in Europe helped the people in Europe to bond and have a sense of belonging to their country. Nationalism was initially a social and cultural movement that served as a significant influence during the French Revolution, where the French people aimed at liberty, equality, and fraternity. When Napoleon rose to power, the concept of nationalism spread, where people began to unite themselves as part of a common bond that included language, cultural heritage, and political ideals.Napoleon took up policies that helped promote nationalism, such as establishing a common culture for the French people, which helped to unify them and boost their sense of nationalism. The move served to bring together the people of France, establishing a sense of unity and making them feel like they were part of a common bond.The promotion of nationalism helped to create a sense of identity and belonging among the people in the country, which helped to create a feeling of oneness. The ideology of nationalism spread throughout the European continent, where different countries began to develop their national identities, which in turn strengthened their sovereignty.In conclusion, nationalism spread under Napoleon when people began to unite themselves as part of a common bond that included cultural heritage, language, and political ideals.
To know more about heritage visit :-
https://brainly.com/question/29572602
#SPJ11
Which of the following was a reason for instability in ancient Mesopotamia?
a
The collapse of fisheries in the Persian Gulf on which the population relied
b
The rivalries between independent city-states that led to warfare
c
The failure of a patriarchal system to emerge in Mesopotamia
d
The failure of Mesopotamia to develop written law codes
One of the reasons for instability in ancient Mesopotamia was the rivalries between independent city-states that led to warfare.
Ancient Mesopotamia was composed of numerous independent city-states, such as Sumer, Akkad, and Babylon. These city-states often engaged in conflicts and rivalries over resources, territory, and political power. The constant warfare between these city-states created a state of instability and insecurity within the region. The competition for dominance and control often resulted in power struggles, destruction of cities, and disruption of trade networks.
While factors like the collapse of fisheries, the failure of a patriarchal system, and the absence of written law codes might have had some impact on the stability of ancient Mesopotamia, the rivalries between independent city-states and the resulting warfare were significant contributors to the overall instability of the region. These conflicts not only weakened individual city-states but also hindered the development of a centralized and unified political system, leading to ongoing tensions and instability in ancient Mesopotamia.
to learn more about Mesopotamia click here:
brainly.com/question/14382121
#SPJ11
what happened to the two men convicted of treason during the whiskey rebellion?
The Whiskey Rebellion was a 1791-1794 uprising in Western Pennsylvania and parts of the trans-Appalachian frontier. The rebellion started due to the Whiskey Tax imposed by the federal government on distilled spirits, which affected small farmers and whiskey producers.
During the Whiskey Rebellion, two men were convicted of treason. They were John Mitchell and Philip Weigel. Mitchell and Weigel had organized the meeting where the whiskey rebels formulated their complaints against the government. They were found guilty of treason against the United States in federal court on the grounds that they had conspired with the insurgents to levy war against the government.
After being convicted, John Mitchell and Philip Weigel were sentenced to hang. However, they were granted clemency by President George Washington in response to their lawyers' appeals and the intervention of influential members of the community, such as Supreme Court Justice James Wilson. Their sentences were commuted to house arrest. Both Mitchell and Weigel served six months in prison before being released and then placed under house arrest for a year after their release. The Whiskey Rebellion demonstrated the federal government's ability to maintain order and enforce its laws, while also highlighting the tensions between western farmers and the eastern political elite.
To know more about Whiskey Rebellion visit:
https://brainly.com/question/478473
#SPJ11
the early industrial revolution primarily relied on fossil fuels to
Answer:
Explanation:
The early Industrial Revolution primarily relied on fossil fuels to power steam engines. The main fossil fuel was coal, and the steam engine was the first machine to transform fossil fuel into mechanical energy. In the early Industrial Revolution, steam engines powered looms in large textile mills.
The early industrial revolution primarily relied on fossil fuels, particularly coal and later oil, to power the machinery and technologies that drove industrialization during that period.
How did the early industrial revolution primarily rely on fossil fuels?The early industrial revolution, which took place roughly from the mid-18th to mid-19th century, did indeed rely heavily on the use of fossil fuels. Fossil fuels, such as coal and later on, oil, played a crucial role in powering the machinery and technologies that drove industrialization during that period.
Coal was the primary fossil fuel used during the early industrial revolution. It was widely available in regions like England, which became the epicenter of the industrial revolution. Coal was used as a fuel source for steam engines, which were instrumental in powering factories, mines, and transportation systems like railways and steamships. Steam engines revolutionized industries by providing a reliable and efficient source of power, replacing traditional manual labor and water-driven mechanisms.
Later on, with the discovery and extraction of oil, particularly in the late 19th century, the industrial revolution further expanded its reliance on fossil fuels. Oil was more versatile than coal and could be used as a fuel for internal combustion engines, which powered automobiles, trucks, and various machinery. This led to the rapid development of the automotive industry and further advancements in transportation and manufacturing.
The availability, affordability, and energy density of fossil fuels made them highly attractive for powering the growing industries during the early industrial revolution. However, it's important to note that the detrimental environmental impacts of fossil fuel combustion, such as air pollution and greenhouse gas emissions, were not yet widely understood or considered at that time. The long-term consequences of relying heavily on fossil fuels are now recognized as a significant challenge for the planet in terms of climate change and environmental degradation.
Learn more about: Industrial revolution
brainly.com/question/32280733
#SPJ11
Which of the following are functions of employees working in the White House Office?
A) prosecute those accused of spying and treason against the government
B) report to the President on the purchase of supplies for the government
C) advise the President on foreign, domestic, and defense matters
D) preside over certain congressional hearings and legislative matters
The functions of employees working in the White House Office include advising the President on foreign, domestic, and defense matters.
The President's advisors include the Vice President, White House Chief of Staff, Press Secretary, National Security Advisor, and Cabinet members. This is the answer. In the United States, the White House Office is the President's closest group of advisers, assistants, and analysts. The President's advisors include the Vice President, White House Chief of Staff, Press Secretary, National Security Advisor, and Cabinet members. Advising the President on foreign, domestic, and defense matters is one of the most important tasks that employees in the White House Office perform.
The President is responsible for making critical choices that have an impact on the country's economy, security, and people's daily lives. The President's team assists him in gathering information, analyzing it, and making informed choices.
To know more about White House visit-
https://brainly.com/question/32426582
#SPJ11
What sources of authority in the church does Hus accept? Which does he deny?
a) Hus accepts the authority of Scripture and the Pope. He denies the authority of traditions.
b) Hus accepts the authority of the Pope and traditions. He denies the authority of Scripture.
c) Hus accepts the authority of the Pope. He denies the authority of Scripture and traditions.
d) Hus accepts the authority of Scripture. He denies the authority of the Pope and traditions.
The correct option is (d). Hus accepts the authority of Scripture and denies the authority of traditions.
Jan Hus, a religious reformer and theologian, was influenced by John Wycliffe's ideas, and he shared some of the ideas that Luther would later articulate. In the sources of authority in the church, Hus accepted the authority of Scripture and denied the authority of traditions. In his view, the church was subordinate to the Bible and not the other way around, as the Bible contains everything necessary for salvation.
Hus was opposed to the tradition as a source of authority, seeing it as an obstacle to a return to the apostolic church. He believed that the Bible should be the ultimate source of authority in the church. On the other hand, Hus did not fully accept the authority of the Pope and the Catholic Church hierarchy, leading him to criticize the selling of indulgences and other church practices.
To know more about the Catholic Church visit:
https://brainly.com/question/298030
#SPJ11
In philemon, paul pleads with philemon to take onesimus back and forgive him for both the crimes of stealing and running away because "you owe me over and above your very soul."
Paul pleads with Philemon to take Onesimus back and forgive him for both stealing and running away because of their close personal relationship and Paul's belief that Philemon owes him a debt of gratitude.
In the book of Philemon, Paul writes a letter to his friend Philemon, who is a prominent member of the Christian community. Paul addresses the issue of Onesimus, a runaway slave who had become a believer in Christ while being in Paul's company. Paul pleads with Philemon to receive Onesimus back, not as a mere slave, but as a beloved brother in Christ. He asks Philemon to forgive Onesimus for his previous actions of stealing and running away.
The key reason behind Paul's plea lies in the depth of their personal relationship. Paul highlights their close bond by saying, "you owe me over and above your very soul." This indicates that Philemon owes Paul not just a debt of gratitude but also a profound spiritual debt. Paul's intention is to appeal to this deep connection and remind Philemon of the grace and forgiveness that he himself has received from God.
By urging Philemon to forgive Onesimus, Paul emphasizes the transformative power of the Gospel. Paul believes that in Christ, individuals are given the opportunity to experience forgiveness and reconciliation. He urges Philemon to extend this same grace to Onesimus, emphasizing the importance of unity and the restoration of relationships within the Christian community.
Learn more about Paul pleads:
brainly.com/question/29447094
#SPJ11
use the map to answer the question. which territory did mexico cede to the united states as a result of the mexican war? responses i one ii two iii three iv
Mexico ceded territory to the United States as a result of the Mexican War.
What land did Mexico give up to the US due to the Mexican War?As a result of the Mexican War, Mexico was forced to cede a significant amount of territory to the United States. This territory, known as the Mexican Cession, encompassed several present-day states in the southwestern region of the United States. The land included California, Nevada, Utah, most of Arizona, parts of New Mexico, Colorado, Wyoming, and small portions of Kansas and Oklahoma.
The Mexican Cession was formalized through the signing of the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo in 1848, which marked the end of the war between the two countries. The acquisition of this territory greatly expanded the territorial extent of the United States and had a lasting impact on the development and history of the region.
Learn more about war
brainly.com/question/30667866
#SPJ11
explain how the caste system is structured and why it results in social inequalltiy
The caste system is structured in a hierarchical way where individuals are born into a particular caste and have limited social mobility. It results in social inequality as it reinforces the idea of superior and inferior castes.
The caste system is a social hierarchy that originated in ancient India. It is structured in a way that assigns individuals to a particular caste based on their birth. There are four main castes, namely Brahmins (priests and scholars), Kshatriyas (warriors and rulers), Vaishyas (merchants and traders), and Shudras (servants and laborers). Beyond these four castes, there is the Dalit or untouchable caste, considered outside the caste system and the most oppressed.
Individuals are expected to follow strict rules of behavior and customs that correspond to their caste. They cannot marry outside their caste, nor can they change their occupation or social position. This limited social mobility reinforces the idea of superior and inferior castes, leading to discrimination and oppression.
The caste system results in social inequality because it perpetuates the idea that one caste is superior to others. The higher castes hold greater power and privilege, while the lower castes experience discrimination and marginalization. For example, Dalits were historically considered "untouchable" and were excluded from participating in social and economic activities. Even though discrimination is now outlawed in India, the caste system still affects social and economic opportunities for many individuals.
To know more about the social inequality visit:
https://brainly.com/question/30238991
#SPJ11
using your book, explain relationship between the sacred and human welfare in the muslim and native american religious tradi
The sacred is the foundation of Muslim and Native American religious traditions. Both religions believe that living in harmony with the sacred will lead to human welfare.
The concept of the sacred is central to both Muslim and Native American religious traditions. For Muslims, the sacred is embodied in the Quran, which is considered the word of God and the final revelation to humanity. Muslims believe that living in accordance with the teachings of the Quran and the example of the Prophet Muhammad will lead to human welfare both in this life and in the afterlife.
Similarly, for Native Americans, the sacred is embodied in the natural world and the spirits that inhabit it. Native Americans believe that living in harmony with the natural world and the spirits will lead to human welfare. This includes respecting the earth, preserving its resources, and living in a sustainable way.
Both traditions believe that the sacred is the foundation of human welfare and that living in harmony with the sacred is essential for human flourishing. This connection between the sacred and human welfare underscores the importance of religious traditions in promoting individual and social well-being.
To know more about the Native American visit:
https://brainly.com/question/28505621
#SPJ11
max weber urged sociologists to strive toward the goal of being value-free.T/F
True.
Max Weber, a prominent sociologist, emphasized the importance of value neutrality or value freedom in sociological research. Max Weber advocated for sociologists to pursue the goal of being value-free or value-neutral in their research.
How did Max Weber urge sociologists?Max Weber, a prominent sociologist, emphasized the importance of value neutrality or value freedom in sociological research. He argued that sociologists should strive to separate their personal values and biases from their scientific investigations in order to achieve objectivity and impartiality. Weber believed that by maintaining value-free analysis, sociologists could better understand and interpret social phenomena without allowing their own subjective opinions to influence their work.
Max Weber urged sociologists to strive toward the goal of being value-free or value-neutral in their research to maintain objectivity and impartiality. He argued that by separating personal values and biases, sociologists can better understand and interpret social phenomena without allowing subjective opinions to influence their work. Weber believed that value-free analysis would lead to a more accurate and unbiased understanding of society.
So it is true.
Learn more about:sociologist
brainly.com/question/14424248
#SPJ11
define historiography. has historiography changed over tijme or stayed the same? why is this distinction important? use complete sentences for your response
Historiography is the study and interpretation of historical writing and the methods used by historians to analyze and understand the past.
Over time, historiography has changed significantly. In the past, history was often written from a biased perspective, emphasizing the deeds of rulers and the elite while ignoring the experiences of marginalized groups. However, in recent decades, historiography has become more inclusive and diverse, incorporating the voices and perspectives of previously overlooked individuals and communities. There has been a shift towards social history, which focuses on the lives of ordinary people, as well as the exploration of previously marginalized topics such as gender, race, and class.
This distinction is important because historiography shapes our understanding of the past. The way history is written and interpreted can influence our perception of events, individuals, and societies. By recognizing the changing nature of historiography, we become more aware of the biases and limitations of historical accounts. It allows us to critically examine the narratives presented to us and encourages a more comprehensive and nuanced understanding of history.
Learn more about historical writing:
brainly.com/question/29614614
#SPJ11
brianly read these four passages about world war 1 and answer the questions that follow
Passage 1: The assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand of Austria-Hungary in Sarajevo on June 28, 1914, triggered a chain of events that led to the outbreak of World War 1. The archduke was the heir to the throne of the Austro-Hungarian Empire, a powerful multinational state that dominated Central and Eastern Europe. His death sparked a diplomatic crisis that escalated into a war between the two rival alliances of European powers: the Triple Entente (France, Russia, and Britain) and the Triple Alliance (Germany, Austria-Hungary, and Italy).
Passage 2: World War 1 was fought on two main fronts: the Western Front and the Eastern Front. The Western Front was a line of trenches that stretched from the North Sea to the Swiss border, where the armies of France, Britain, and their allies faced the German army. The Eastern Front was a vast area of land that spanned from the Baltic Sea to the Black Sea, where the Russian army fought against the armies of Germany and Austria-Hungary. Both fronts witnessed brutal battles that resulted in millions of casualties and enormous destruction.
Passage 3: World War 1 also involved fighting in other regions of the world, such as the Middle East, Africa, Asia, and the Pacific. Some of these conflicts were caused by the colonial ambitions of the European powers, who sought to expand or protect their overseas territories. For example, the Ottoman Empire, which was allied with Germany and Austria-Hungary, fought against the British and French forces in the Gallipoli Campaign, the Mesopotamian Campaign, and the Arab Revolt. Other conflicts were triggered by the involvement of new participants in the war, such as Japan, which joined the Entente and attacked German colonies in China and the Pacific islands.
Passage 4: World War 1 ended with the signing of several peace treaties that reshaped the map of Europe and the world. The most important of these treaties was the Treaty of Versailles, which was signed on June 28, 1919, exactly five years after the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand. The treaty imposed harsh terms on Germany, such as accepting full responsibility for the war, paying reparations to the Allies, losing its colonies and territories, and reducing its military. The treaty also created new nations out of the former empires of Austria-Hungary, Russia, and Ottoman Turkey, such as Poland, Czechoslovakia, Yugoslavia, Finland, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Armenia, Syria, Iraq, and Palestine.
About World War 1World War I was a global war centered in Europe that began on 28 July 1914 to 11 November 1918. This war is often called the World War or the Great War from the time it occurred until the start of World War II in 1939, and the First World War or World War I after that.
Learn More About World War 1 at https://brainly.com/question/446364
#SPJ11
what was a consequence of the withdrawal of roman armies from britain?
Answer:
Explanation:
The withdrawal of Roman armies from Britain had several consequences:
Political Fragmentation: The withdrawal of Roman forces left a power vacuum in Britain, leading to political fragmentation and the emergence of various regional kingdoms. This fragmentation contributed to a period of instability and conflicts between different tribes and factions.
Increased Anglo-Saxon Influence: With the departure of Roman authority, the influence of the Anglo-Saxons increased. The Anglo-Saxons, a Germanic people, began migrating to Britain and eventually established their own kingdoms, marking the beginning of the Anglo-Saxon period in British history.
Decline in Urbanization and Infrastructure: The withdrawal of Roman forces led to a decline in urbanization and the deterioration of infrastructure in Britain. Many Roman cities and towns were abandoned or fell into disrepair, and the sophisticated Roman infrastructure, such as roads, aqueducts, and public buildings, was no longer maintained.
Loss of Trade and Economic Decline: The withdrawal of Roman forces disrupted trade routes and led to a decline in economic activity. Britain's connection to the wider Roman Empire was severed, and the region experienced a decline in trade and economic prosperity.
Cultural Shifts: With the departure of the Romans, there was a shift in cultural influences. The Roman presence had a significant impact on the culture, language, and social structures in Britain. After their withdrawal, new cultural elements from the Anglo-Saxons and other Germanic tribes began to shape the region.
Overall, the withdrawal of Roman armies from Britain resulted in political, social, economic, and cultural changes, setting the stage for the subsequent development of Anglo-Saxon England.
After the Roman armies left Britain, there were several consequences. Britain was left vulnerable to attacks by the Picts and Scots who raided and attacked vulnerable cities and towns, prompting the Britons to seek military help from continental Europe.
As a result, Anglo-Saxon invaders began to settle in Britain, and in the process, they gradually established a new culture and language that would eventually become Old English. Another consequence of the withdrawal of Roman armies was the gradual decline of trade in Britain. With the departure of the Romans, the Britons lost their biggest trading partner, making it harder for them to sell goods to the rest of the world. Furthermore, the end of Roman occupation also saw the decline of public services such as public baths, aqueducts, and roads.
The withdrawal of Roman armies had several consequences, including leaving Britain vulnerable to attacks, the establishment of a new culture and language, the gradual decline of trade, and the loss of public services.
To know more about Roman empire visit-
https://brainly.com/question/32649393
#SPJ11
the united states' acquisition of the panama canal zone best exemplifies the _____.
The United States' acquisition of the Panama Canal Zone best exemplifies the concept of "imperialism."
Imperialism refers to a policy or practice in which a powerful country extends its influence and control over other territories, often with economic, political, or military motivations. In the case of the Panama Canal Zone, the United States pursued imperialistic goals by obtaining control over the strategic land corridor in Panama for the construction and operation of the Panama Canal.
The acquisition of the Panama Canal Zone involved various imperialistic actions:
1. Panama's Separation from Colombia: The United States played a significant role in supporting Panama's separation from Colombia in 1903, which led to the establishment of an independent Panama. This intervention was motivated by the United States' desire to secure rights to build the canal and have control over it.
2. Negotiating the Hay-Bunau-Varilla Treaty: The United States negotiated the Hay-Bunau-Varilla Treaty in 1903 with the newly established Republic of Panama. The treaty granted the United States exclusive control over the Panama Canal Zone, a strip of land stretching approximately 10 miles on either side of the canal's route.
3. Construction and Operation of the Canal: The United States assumed full control over the construction and operation of the Panama Canal, which took place from 1904 to 1914. The project involved immense engineering efforts and exerted significant influence over the Panamanian territory during that period.
The acquisition of the Panama Canal Zone exemplifies imperialism because the United States sought control over a foreign territory for its economic and strategic interests. The canal provided a crucial shortcut for international trade and naval power projection, enhancing U.S. global influence. The imperialistic actions taken by the United States in obtaining and operating the Panama Canal Zone showcased the expansionist tendencies and foreign policy objectives of the country during that era.
To know more Panama Canal Zone, click here:https://brainly.com/question/10227233
#SPJ11
What does Howard Becker call individuals who specifically choose to embrace a deviant identity?
a. rebels
b. nonconformists
c. anabaptists
Howard Becker calls individuals who specifically choose to embrace a deviant identity as d). "outsiders".
A deviant identity is an identity that is different from the societal norms. This may include but is not limited to using drugs, gender non-conformity, sexual orientation, and so on.
Howard Becker, a sociologist, studied the labeling theory that explains why certain individuals or acts are labeled as deviant. According to Becker, the society has different norms and values that a person has to follow, failing which the person can be labeled deviant.
When a person is labeled deviant, the society ostracizes them, and they are considered outsiders. For example, a person using drugs is considered a deviant and is labeled as an outsider.
Therefore, the correct answer is d. outsiders
Here the complete question. What does Howard Becker call individuals who specifically choose to embrace a deviant identity?
a. rebels
b. nonconformists
c. anabaptists
d. outsiders
Learn more aboout outsiders: brainly.com/question/24817486
#SPJ11
The individuals who specifically choose to embrace a deviant identity, Howard Becker calls them "nonconformists".
Becker's sociological perspective on deviance highlights how individuals who violate the established norms, rules, or laws of a culture or society, are identified and labeled as deviant by the society at large. In Becker's view, deviance is not a characteristic of individuals or actions, but rather the consequence of interactions between individuals and society.Becker introduced the concept of "deviant career" to describe how individuals become labeled as deviant, leading to a new identity and way of life that becomes central to their socialization. According to Becker, once a person is labeled deviant, it changes how they see themselves and how others see them, which leads to the individual embracing a deviant identity. Nonconformity is the basis for the concept of a deviant career. Nonconformity is the rejection of established norms, values, or rules of conduct. It is a form of rebellion that can lead to deviant behavior. Nonconformity and deviance go hand-in-hand, as nonconformists are often labeled as deviant by mainstream society. Therefore, the individuals who specifically choose to embrace a deviant identity, Howard Becker calls them "nonconformists."Hence, the answer is option (b) nonconformists.
To know more about nonconformists visit :-
https://brainly.com/question/4221986
#SPJ11
Electrochemistry: Voltaic Cells (30 pts) In electrochemistry, a voltaic cell is a specially prepared system in which an oxidation-reduction reaction occurs spontaneously. This spontaneous reaction produces an easily measured electrical potential. A voltaic cell is constructed by using two metal electrodes and solutions of their respective salts (the electrolyte component of the cell) with known molar concentrations. Data Collection Go to https://pages.uoregon.edu/tgreenbo/voltaicCellEMF.html. Your screen should look like the figure below. This apparatus is called a voltaic cell. Pop out menus will allow you to select metals (electrodes) and ionic solutions to be placed into two beakers that are connected by a salt bridge. You can then connect the metals to a voltmeter to measure the cell voltage (E°). Part I. Data Analysis and Interpretation of Cu/Zn cell. 1. Click on the left pop-out tab for metals and select Cu, click on the left pop-out tab for solutions and select Cu(NO3)2(aq) and choose 1.0 M concentration. Use the right tabs and select Zn and 1.0 M Zn(NO3)2(aq). Click on the power switch of the voltage meter. Observe the action of the simulation. Use the following drawing to sketch and label what is happening and to answer the following questions a) What is the voltage (E°) generated by the chemical reaction? b) Indicate the directions of electron flow in the circuit and ion flow (cation and anion) in the salt bridge? (Label in the figure above) c) Write a net ionic equation (half reaction) representing what’s happening in the left beaker. d) Write a net ionic equation (half reaction) representing what’s happening in the right beaker. e) Combine the two half reactions into a complete reaction. f) Write the shorthand notation for the cell. g) Determine what happens if you reverse the cell by placing Cu/Cu(NO3)2 in the right beaker and the Zn/Zn(NO3)2 in the left beaker. Explain what you observe. h) What is the significance of having a salt bridge in an electrochemical cell? Part II. Data Collection: a) Repeat the procedure of Part I. for all the combinations in the following table. Record the cell voltages for each condition. Record the direction of electron flow from electrode to electrode. NOTE: click on power off switch between changing electrodes. Left Cell Right Cell Voltage (E°) Direction of Electrons 1) Ag/AgNO3, 1.0M Cu/Cu(NO3)2, 1.0M From to 2) Ag/AgNO3, 1.0M Zn/Zn(NO3)2, 1.0M From to 3) Cu/Cu(NO3)2, 0.10M Zn/Zn(NO3)2, 0.10M From to 4) Zn/Zn(NO3)2, 0.10M Zn/Zn(NO3)2, 1.0M From to b) For each of the four combinations in the table above, Write the two half reactions that are combined to generate the overall reaction. The reaction for Ag/AgNO3 and Cu/Cu(NO3)2 is shown as an example. 1) Cu(s) → Cu2+(aq) + 2e– E° = Ag+(aq) + e– → Ag (s) E° = 2) 3) 4) c) The last cell 4) in the table of question a) is known as a concentration cell. Use the Nernst equation to calculate the theoretical value of E of the Zn-concentration cell that measured in the simulation.
The simulation and data collection process involve constructing a voltaic cell using different metal electrodes and ionic solutions, observing the generated voltage, electron and ion flow, writing net ionic equations, and analyzing the significance of a salt bridge in an electrochemical cell.
What is the process involved in constructing and analyzing a voltaic cell?To conduct the experiment, a voltaic cell is created by selecting metal electrodes (such as Cu or Zn) and corresponding ionic solutions (e.g., Cu(NO3)2(aq) or Zn(NO3)2(aq)) with known molar concentrations.
By connecting the electrodes with a salt bridge, the cell generates a measurable voltage (E°) resulting from a spontaneous oxidation-reduction reaction.
In the first part of the data analysis, the specific steps involve selecting Cu and Cu(NO3)2(aq) with a 1.0 M concentration for the left beaker, and Zn with Zn(NO3)2(aq) with a 1.0 M concentration for the right beaker.
The voltage generated by the chemical reaction is observed, and the directions of electron flow in the circuit and ion flow in the salt bridge are identified and labeled.
Net ionic equations representing the half reactions in each beaker are written, and these are combined to form a complete reaction. The shorthand notation for the cell is also determined.
In the second part, the procedure is repeated for different combinations of metals and ionic solutions, recording the cell voltages and directions of electron flow.
Net ionic equations are written for each combination, representing the half reactions that contribute to the overall reaction.
The last part of the experiment involves a concentration cell, specifically the Zn-concentration cell.
The Nernst equation is utilized to calculate the theoretical value of E for this cell based on the measured simulation data.
In summary, the process of constructing and analyzing a voltaic cell involves selecting metal electrodes and ionic solutions, observing voltage generation, identifying electron and ion flow, writing net ionic equations, and analyzing the significance of a salt bridge.
This experimental approach provides insights into electrochemistry and the behavior of oxidation-reduction reactions in different cell configurations.
Learn more about voltaic cell
brainly.com/question/29186551
#SPJ11
The transformation of the American economy during the late nineteenth century resulted inA. a stabilization of the economic cycle.B. an increase in farm prices.C. increased instability in the economic cycle.D. an end to depressions in the United States.
The transformation of the American economy during the late nineteenth century resulted in c). increased instability in the economic cycle.
The transformation of the American economy in the late nineteenth century refers to the significant shift from agricultural to an industrial economy, which resulted in a period of economic growth.
The transition from the agrarian to an industrial economy was made possible by various factors, including the availability of raw materials, a growing labor force, new technological advancements, and increased infrastructure.
The growth of industries and urbanization during this period led to an increase in economic instability, including boom and bust cycles, labor unrest, and increased poverty and inequality.
The increase in the number of businesses and industries led to intense competition that forced many small firms out of the market and enabled the larger companies to dominate.
In conclusion, the transformation of the American economy during the late nineteenth century resulted in increased instability in the economic cycle.
Therefore, the correct answer is c). increased instability in the economic cycle
Learn more about American economy: brainly.com/question/1106682
#SPJ11
The correct answer is C. Increased instability in the economic cycle. The transformation of the American economy during the late nineteenth century resulted in increased instability in the economic cycle.
In the late nineteenth century, the American economy underwent significant changes that had a major impact on its stability. The transformation of the American economy during this period was characterized by a move from a rural, agrarian society to an urban, industrialized one.The rapid industrialization of the United States during the late nineteenth century led to increased instability in the economic cycle. This instability was largely due to the fact that industrialization created a boom-and-bust cycle in the economy, with periods of rapid expansion followed by periods of contraction and recession. This boom-and-bust cycle was fueled by a number of factors, including technological innovations, the growth of new industries, and the rise of large corporations. In addition to the boom-and-bust cycle, the transformation of the American economy during the late nineteenth century also led to increased competition and consolidation in many industries. This competition and consolidation created winners and losers in the economy, with some companies and industries thriving while others struggled or went out of business. This uneven distribution of economic growth and prosperity contributed to the instability of the economic cycle during this period. Overall, the transformation of the American economy during the late nineteenth century resulted in increased instability in the economic cycle. This instability was due to the boom-and-bust cycle created by rapid industrialization, as well as the uneven distribution of economic growth and prosperity in many industries.
To know more about transformation visit :-
https://brainly.com/question/11709244
#SPJ11
puritan communities in the first half of the seventeenth century could be characterized by
Puritan communities in the first half of the seventeenth century could be characterized by religious fervor, theocracy, moral discipline, community cohesion, education, hard work, economic prosperity, and intolerance.
Puritan communities in the early 1600s were known for their strong religious commitment and practices. They sought to establish communities based on strict interpretations of Christianity and the Bible. These communities often operated under theocratic systems of government, where religious leaders held significant influence and authority. Puritans emphasized moral discipline and the regulation of behavior to create virtuous and orderly communities. Communal cohesion was essential, with community members expected to support and assist one another. Education, particularly religious education, was highly valued, leading to the establishment of schools. Puritans believed in the importance of hard work and viewed economic success as a sign of God's favor. However, while seeking religious freedom for themselves, Puritans were often intolerant of differing religious views and actively enforced conformity. It's important to note that while these characteristics provide a general overview, Puritan communities were not entirely uniform, and there were variations in beliefs and practices among different Puritan groups.
To know more about puritan communities, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/4878150
#SPJ11
The name of which leader best completes the title of the graphic?
O A. Alexander Hamilton
OB. Samuel Adams
OC. George Mason
OD. Patrick Henry
SUBMIT
Answer:
A. Alexander Hamilton
Explanation:
I tried looking up the answer and people keep saying Alexander Hamilton.
What is your opinion on the former president #45 (Trump) being indited in New York? (5-10 sentences)
This is my opinion on the former president.
Regarding the former president, Donald Trump, being indicted in New York, it's important to note that as of my knowledge cutoff in September 2021, there were ongoing investigations and legal proceedings involving Trump and his organization in New York.
However, the outcome of those investigations or any potential indictments or legal actions that may have occurred after that time are not within my knowledge.
Indictments and legal proceedings are part of the judicial process, allowing for allegations to be examined and tested in a court of law.
The specifics of any indictment against Trump, if it were to happen, would depend on the charges brought forward by the prosecutors and the evidence they present. The ultimate determination of guilt or innocence rests with the courts.
It's worth mentioning that public opinions on this matter can vary widely, depending on political affiliations, beliefs, and individual perspectives.
for similar questions on former president.
https://brainly.com/question/924435
#SPJ8
why did the puritans kick roger williams out of the massachusetts bay colony
Roger Williams was kicked out of the Massachusetts Bay Colony by the Puritans due to his outspoken beliefs and criticism of their practices.
Roger Williams was an English Protestant theologian who arrived in Massachusetts Bay Colony in 1631. He quickly became an influential member of the Puritan community due to his extensive knowledge of theology. However, Williams had outspoken beliefs and was not afraid to criticize the Puritan leaders for their practices. One of his most controversial beliefs was that the Church of England was corrupt, and he believed in the complete separation of church and state.
Williams also believed that the land belonged to Native Americans and not to the English colonists, which was in contrast to the Puritan belief that they had a divine right to the land. His radical beliefs and criticism of the Puritan leaders ultimately led to his exile from the Massachusetts Bay Colony in 1635. Williams later founded the colony of Rhode Island based on his belief in religious freedom and separation of church and state.
To know more about the Roger Williams visit:
https://brainly.com/question/3333920
#SPJ11
explain one way in which mercantalism affected economies in africa and asia in the period 1450-1750
Mercantilism impacted economies in Africa and Asia during the period 1450-1750 by promoting the extraction and export of valuable resources.
Mercantilism, an economic theory prevalent during the period 1450-1750, aimed to increase a nation's wealth and power through trade and the accumulation of precious metals. One way in which mercantilism affected economies in Africa and Asia was through the promotion of the extraction and export of valuable resources.
During this time, European powers, driven by mercantilist policies, sought to exploit the resources of Africa and Asia to fuel their own economic growth and dominance. This resulted in the establishment of colonial systems that focused on the extraction of valuable resources such as gold, silver, spices, timber, and raw materials like cotton and silk. European powers enforced trade monopolies and controlled the production and distribution of these resources, ensuring that the majority of profits flowed back to the colonial powers.
The impact of mercantilism on African and Asian economies was significant. It led to the disruption of existing trade networks, as resources were diverted to serve the interests of the colonial powers. Indigenous industries and manufacturing were often suppressed or destroyed, as the colonial powers aimed to maintain their dominance over key economic sectors. Additionally, the forced labor and exploitation associated with resource extraction had severe social and economic consequences for local populations.
Learn more about Mercantilism
brainly.com/question/31361207
#SPJ11
