What was the importance in The “Contract with America “?

The majority of the English Colonies were set up as royal colonies, proprietary colonies, or charter colonies.

What are these Colonies?

Royal colonies were directly under the control of the English Crown and were administered by a governor appointed by the monarch. Examples of royal colonies include Virginia, Massachusetts, and New York.

Proprietary colonies were granted by the English Crown to individual proprietors, who had a significant amount of control over the colony. Examples of proprietary colonies include Maryland, Pennsylvania, and Delaware.

Charter colonies were self-governing and were established through a royal charter granted to a group of settlers. The colonists had a significant amount of control over the colony's government and were able to elect their own officials. Examples of charter colonies include Rhode Island and Connecticut.

Learn more about royal colonies here: https://brainly.com/question/2073877

#SPJ1

option b is correct was discovered, but Vesey escaped north to freedom. Carpenter and former slave Denmark Vesey allegedly plotted an enslaved

What was Denmark Vesey an adherent of?

Vesey had been a member of the Second Presbyterian church with other slaves and had grumbled about its exclusion of black people from membership. He helped found a church on the African Methodist Episcopal Church's "Bethel circuit" in 1818 after gaining freedom from slavery (AME Church).

Why did Denmark Vesey begin his uprising?

Vesey planned and orchestrated a Black insurrection in the city and on plantations because he was fed up with being treated like a second-class freedman and was resolved to aid the bondsmen he knew who were subjected to far worse conditions.

To know more about Denmark Vesey  visit :-

https://brainly.com/question/30246148

#SPJ1

Answer:The two Harriets were known as abolitionists because they favored the abolition of slavery. Two of the best-known abolitionists were Harriet Beecher Stowe and Harriet Tubman.

Both Frederick Douglass and Harriet Jacobs were successful in escaping slavery. While Douglass did not share Jacobs' fear of writing or publishing her narrative, it was published in many different forms.

Explanation:

Anti-miscegenation laws, which prohibited interracial marriage and sexual relations, were driven by a combination of eugenics, racism, and nativism. Eugenics, the belief in improving the genetic quality of a population through selective breeding, was a popular idea in the early 20th century, and many supporters saw anti-miscegenation laws as a way to prevent the "degeneration" of the white race through "racial mixing."

Racism, the belief in the inherent superiority of one race over others, also played a significant role in the development and enforcement of anti-miscegenation laws. Many white Americans believed that interracial relationships were immoral and threatened the purity of the white race. They viewed people of color, particularly African Americans, as inferior and saw interracial relationships as a threat to white supremacy.

Nativism, the belief in protecting the interests of native-born or established inhabitants against those of immigrants, also contributed to anti-miscegenation laws. Some white Americans feared that interracial relationships would lead to the "mongrelization" of the white race and undermine the traditional values and social order of American society.

Anti-miscegenation laws were therefore part of a broader effort to promote racial purity, protect white supremacy, and maintain a sense of social and cultural superiority among white Americans. While these laws were ultimately struck down as unconstitutional in the United States, the legacy of eugenics, racism, and nativism continues to shape attitudes and beliefs about race and interracial relationships in the country today.

Answer: Women were more likely to recognize the injustice around them, often being victims themselves.

Women were more likely to fall under the spell of the Second Great Awakening preacher.

Explanation: Based on historical records and analysis, the following options are likely reasons why many social reform movements of the early nineteenth century were led by women:

Women were more likely to recognize the injustice around them, often being victims themselves.

Women were more likely to fall under the spell of the Second Great Awakening preacher.

The option "women held most of the nation's disposable income which movements needed for success" is not an accurate explanation for why women led social reform movements, as women did not generally hold most of the nation's disposable income during this time period.

The option "women were expanding their power in society after gaining the right to vote" is also not a valid reason as women did not gain the right to vote until the early 20th century, well after the social reform movements of the early nineteenth century had already occurred.

c. Saigon

After more than a year of devastating battles between the two sides, North Vietnam launched a major invasion in March 1975, and Congress refused South Vietnamese appeals for support. American embassy officials in Saigon evacuated just before communist forces reached the capital. The fall of Salgon in April 1975 marked the end of the Vietnam War, with all of Vietnam now firmly under communist control. The fighting in Indochina would continue over the next five years, as the new Khmer Rouge communist regime in Cambodia embarked on a brutal suppression campaign that killed over a million people, followed by a Vietnamese invasion of Cambodia and a Chinese invasion of Vietnam. Though the American intervention had triggered this series of events, and the United States would admit several hundred thousand refugees fleeing Vietnam by boat in the late 1970s, Ford's government no longer wielded power or influence in the region.

Answer:

Although an arch-conservative, Bismarck introduced progressive reforms—including universal male suffrage and the establishment of the first welfare state—in order to achieve his goals. He manipulated European rivalries to make Germany a world power, but in doing so laid the groundwork for both World Wars.